"ID","Title","Fiscal Year(s)","Fiscal Year Funding Amount","Legal Citation / Subdivision","Appropriation Language","Proposed Measurable Outcome(s)","Measurable Outcome(s)","Proposed Outcomes Achieved","Other Funds Leveraged","Source of Additional Funds","Direct Expenses","Administration Costs","Recipient Board Members","Number of full time equivalents funded","Recipient","Recipient Type","Body","About the Issue","Project Details","Start Date","End Date","Source","Status","Updates","Details/Reports","First Name","Last Name","Organization Name","Street Address","City","State","Zip Code","Phone","Email","Activity Type","Administered by","Media","Counties Affected","LSOHC Section","Watershed","URL","Advisory Group Members and Qualifications","Board Members and Qualifications","Conflict of Interest Contact","Conflict of Interest Disclosed"
36623,"2016 Soil and Water Conservation District Capacity Funding ",2016,11000000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(o) ",,"Proposed measurable outcomes TBD",,,,"Clean Water Fund",11000000,,,,"Soil and Water Conservation Districts ","Local/Regional Government","Provides grants to Soil and Water Conservation Districts that focuses on increasing capacity to address four resource concern areasSoil Erosion, Riparian Zone Management, Water Storage and Treatment, and Excess Nutrients. ",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,Marcey,Westrick,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources",,,,,"(651) 296-3767",marcey.westrick@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-soil-and-water-conservation-district-capacity-funding,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","Nicole Clapp ",
36675,"2016 Buffer Law Implementation ",2016,2500000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(e) ",,"Proposed measurable outcomes TBD",,,,"Clean Water Fund",2500000,,,3,"Soil and Water Conservation Districts ","Local/Regional Government","Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. For grants to Soil and Water Conservation Districts to ensure compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements for state required buffers and soil erosion law. ",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Marcey,Westrick,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources",,,,,"(651) 296-3767",marcey.westrick@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-buffer-law-implementation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","Nicole Clapp ",
36690,"2016 Habitat Evaluation ",2016,84000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(i) ",,"10 restoration evaluations ",,,,"Clean Water Fund",84000,,,0.5,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources","Local/Regional Government","This program annually evaluates a sample of up to ten Clean Water Fund restoration projects, provides a report on the evaluations in accordance with state law and delivers communications on project outcomes and lessons learned in restoration practice.",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,"Wade ",Johnson,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ",,,,,"(651) 259-5075 ",Wade.A.Johnson@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-habitat-evaluation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Nicole Clapp",No
36626,"2017 - CCMI Directed CWF - Conservation Corps - CCMI (SAGENCY)",2016,500000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(r) using funds appropriated in Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 4, Article 2, Section 7(b) ",,"Direct appropriation to the Conservation Corps of MN & IA. Final outcomes will be provided at grant closeout.",,,,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",500000,,"Members for Conservation Corps MN & IA are:",,"Conservation Corps MN & IA","Local/Regional Government","A legislative directive provides Clean Water Funds to be contracted for services with the Conservation Corps of Minnesota. Through these grants, the Corps funds crew labor to eligible local governments through an application process hosted by the Conservation Corps.",,,2015-10-05,2017-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,Tim,Johnson-Grass,"Conservation Corps MN & IA","2715 Upper Afton Rd Ste 100","Saint Paul",MN,55119,651-209-9900,tim.johnson-grass@conservationcorps.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-ccmi-directed-cwf-conservation-corps-ccmi-sagency,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Nicole Clapp",No
10004457,"Acceleration of Minnesota Conservation Assistance - Final Phase",2016,1000000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 08d","$1,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Water and Soil Resources for the final phase of a pilot program to provide grants to soil and water conservation districts and other units of local and state government for employment of staff to provide technical assistance to secure enrollment and retention of private lands in federal and state conservation programs. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_08d.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Tabor,Hoek,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","520 Lafayette Rd","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(507) 537-7260",tabor.hoek@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acceleration-minnesota-conservation-assistance-final-phase-0,,,,
34284,"Access and Outreach",2016,269000,"Laws of 2015, 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 4, Section 2","For programs and development of the Minnesota Zoological Garden and to provide access and education related to programs on the cultural heritage of Minnesota.",,"Outcomes in FY16 include:Implementation of the Free to Explore program which replaced the previous system for distributing free zoo admission to low income Minnesota families.More than 57,000 guests visiting the Zoo for free.Production of Zoo site maps for visitors in 10 languages (in addition to English.)7,500 adults came to the Zoo for Adults Night Out events.Six guest lectures held with 720 people in attendance.   30 classes, camps and programs held for 310 adult participants.A new advertising partner was selected and our “Where Amazing Lives. Every Day.” brand strategy implemented.Zooper Troopers, illustrated characters that delivered conservation messages, piloted with the opening of the summer dinosaur exhibit.Zoo director visits around the state enhanced with the addition of the Zoomobile to key audiences in Alexandria, Austin, Mankato, Rochester and Virginia.54,280 Minnesotans in 42 Minnesota counties visited by the Zoomobile.",,,,,,,2.88,"Minnesota Zoo","State Government","As Minnesota’s state Zoo, we are committed to ensuring that our programs are accessible to all our citizens – regardless of age, geographic location, disability or background. “Zoo Unlimited” is our community outreach and access initiative that unites a wide range of programs and policies designed to ensure every Minnesotan has unlimited opportunities to form stronger connections with the natural world. Legacy funds help us implement this program bridge barriers that keep people from connecting with all the Zoo has to offer. Access Services The Zoo is committed to ensuring that economic circumstances are not obstacles to experiencing the Minnesota Zoo. With Legacy support the Zoo recently created the position of Community Relations Coordinator, a position responsible for the statutorily-mandated free ticket program for economically disadvantaged Minnesotans, all aspects of ADA compliance, and other programs related to accessibility of the Zoo. Lifelong Learning The Minnesota Zoo is not just for children! Legacy funding supports a number of programs aimed at supporting and expanding Zoo programs for adults. This includes a recently introduced adults only program, “Adult Night Out.” These age 18+ evening events offer an after-hours experience for working and older adults who might not otherwise visit the Zoo. This program also incorporates the Our World Speaker Series designed to engage guests in conservation issues. These lectures are offered free of charge to all attendees, ensuring access for all interested guests. The Zoo is also offering a number of adult education programs that focus on special interest areas such as Zoo horticulture and wildlife photography. These programs serve a range of adult audiences including seniors, corporate groups, and young adults. Strategic Communications In an effort to help Zoo guests care more and do more for conservation, this project was designed to test and implement zoo-based conservation messaging that would encourage people to act for wildlife. The Zoo began implementing its new brand strategy “Where Amazing Lives. Every Day.” This campaign creates a consistent story throughout the Zoo. Expanded Zoomobile Geography can be a barrier to accessing high quality environmental education programs. The Zoomobile program exists to serve people who cannot visit the Minnesota Zoo by bringing the Zoo to them, regardless of where they live in Minnesota. Trained interpretive naturalists travel with animals to all corners of the state and deliver programs at schools, libraries, community centers, children’s hospitals, senior centers, and more. Zoomobile participants experience live animals up close and learn about the ecological principles that connect all living things to one another. Legacy funding makes it possible to expand the service and reach of Zoomobile by sending more staff and more animals throughout the state. ",,,,,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Ongoing,,,Mary,Robison,"Minnesota Zoological Garden","13000 Zoo Boulevard","Apple Valley",MN,55124,9524319200,mary.robison@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Zoological Board",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Carlton, Carver, Cass, Chippewa, Chisago, Clay, Clearwater, Cook, Cottonwood, Crow Wing, Dakota, Dodge, Douglas, Faribault, Fillmore, Freeborn, Goodhue, Grant, Hennepin, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Jackson, Kanabec, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Koochiching, Lac qui Parle, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur, Lincoln, Lyon, Mahnomen, Marshall, Martin, McLeod, Meeker, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Mower, Murray, Nicollet, Nobles, Norman, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pennington, Pine, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Ramsey, Red Lake, Redwood, Renville, Rice, Rock, Roseau, Scott, Sherburne, Sibley, St. Louis, Statewide, Stearns, Steele, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Traverse, Wabasha, Wadena, Waseca, Washington, Watonwan, Wilkin, Winona, Wright, Yellow Medicine",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/access-and-outreach,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2024,436144,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2023,410650,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","In FY23, Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office, regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that will advance the Legacy mission to Acquire Land and Create Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes). ",,,,,,,,2.0,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2022,345140,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","In FY22 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that will advance the Legacy mission to Acquire Land and Create Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes). ","In FY22, Parks and Trails provided Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advanced the Legacy mission to Acquire Land and Create Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments). ",,,,,,,1.8,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2021,360098,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","In FY21 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that will advance the Legacy mission to Acquire Land and Create Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).",,,,,,,,1.9,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2020,480127,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","In FY 20 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).","In FY20 Parks and Trails provided Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advanced the Legacy mission to Acquire Land and Create Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).",,,,,,,2.5,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2019,501438,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 19 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).","In FY 19 this program provided support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).",,,,,,,2.5,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2018,613201,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 18 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).","In FY 18 this program provided support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).",,,,,,,2.8,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2017,736809,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 17 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. ","In FY 17 this program provided support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).",,,,,,,3.9,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2016,640271,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 16 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. ","In FY 16 this program provided support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities: 1. New State Trail Construction; 2. Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development; and 3. Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).",,,,181650,458621,,4.74,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2015,711218,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,9.0,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2014,732000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,9.0,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2013,393000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,4987100,393000,,0.25,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18200,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2012,412250,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,4509000,412250,,0.25,,,"Acquiring Land and Creating Opportunities - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to create new and expanded park and trail opportunities to satisfy current customers as well as to reach out to new ones. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of acquiring land and creating opportunities that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquiring-land-and-creating-opportunities-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
34060,"Acquire Microfilm Reader/Printer/Scanner",2016,9385,"Laws of Minnesota for 2011 Chapter 6, Article 4, Subdivision 5, Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants.","Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants. $5,250,000 the first year and $5,250,000 the second year are for history programs and projects operated or conducted by or through local, county, regional, or other historical or cultural organizations; or for activities to preserve significant historic and cultural resources.","Available upon request. Contact",,,,"Available upon request. Contact",9385,,"Stan Ehrke, Karen Hendricksen, Gerard Stifter, Mary Henke, Dave Horrmann, Gary Ziemer, Anne Hahn, Scott Rehman, Tara Russell",0.00,"McLeod County Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To purchase a microfilm reader/printer to broaden public accessibility to microfilmed records.",,,2015-12-01,2016-12-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Lori,Pickell-Stangel,"McLeod County Historical Society","380 School Road NW",Hutchinson,MN,55350,320-587-2109,,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,"Statewide, McLeod",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/acquire-microfilm-readerprinterscanner-11,,"Minnesota Historical Society Governing Board: William R. Stoeri, President Missy S. Thompson, Vice President Ruth Huss, Vice President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary Dean M. Nelson, Treasurer Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Robert Bruininks Judith S. Corson D. Stephen Elliott Phyllis Rawls Goff William D. Green David R. Hakensen Ruth S. Huss Martha Kaemmer Dennis L. Lamkin David M. Larson Charles Mahar Dean M. Nelson Elizabeth M. Nordlie Dennis Nguyen Peter R. Reis Hussein Samatar Simon Stevens Susan Kenny Stevens William R. Stoeri Karen Wilson Thissen Missy Staples Thompson Eleanor Winston Ex-Officio: Mark Dayton, Governor Yvonne Prattner Solon Lieutenant Governor Mark Ritchie, Secretary of State Lori Swanson, Attorney General Rebecca Otto, State Auditor",,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2025,4799000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (c) $4,799,000 the first year and $4,799,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ",,,,,,,,,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2024,4799000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (c) $4,799,000 the first year and $4,799,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","The following are cumulative measures as of 6/30/2024 Individuals have received loans in 72 counties 2,400 loans have been issued with Clean Water Funds 233 loans related to agricultural waste management 981 loans related to structural erosion control 124 loans related to conservation tillage 947 loans addressing septic systems 115 other practices Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans is $34,629,214 ",,6778024,,560890,11188,,0.43,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2023,75000,"M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","The following are cumulative measures as of 6/30/2023:  Individuals have received loans in 69 counties 2,253 loans have been issued with Clean Water Funds 212 loans related to agricultural waste management 981 loans related to structural erosion control 92 loans related to conservation tillage 881 loans addressing septic systems 87 other practices Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans is $34,629,214 ",,4501223,,,61382,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2022,75000,"M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","The following are cumulative measures as of 12/5/2022.  Individuals have received loans in 59 counties 2,212 loans have been issued with Clean Water Funds 203 loans related to agricultural waste management 981 loans related to structural erosion control 79 loans related to conservation tillage 869 loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans is $30,127,991 ",,,,,61382,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2021,75000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans On and On an individual basis, to what degree or what extent have the loans helped farmers implement conservation practices? Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ",,,,,,45187,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2020,75000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans On and On an individual basis, to what degree or what extent have the loans helped farmers implement conservation practices? Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","As of 12/31/2020 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,065 loans totaling an amount of $27,338,954.65. The program has leveraged $40,634,600. Under the revolving framework, the appropriations have been used 2 times. By practice type: 187 loans were for agricultural waste management projects; 980 structural erosion control 55 conservation tillage equipment; 784 for septic systems upgrades or relocation; and 59 other.  ",,,,,45187,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2019,75000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans On and On an individual basis, to what degree or what extent have the loans helped farmers implement conservation practices? Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","As of 12/31/2018 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 1,313 loans totaling an amount of $21,068,940.59. By practice type, 158 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 34 for conservation tillage equipment, and 718 for septic systems upgrades or relocation. At this time the program has leveraged 42% of the total cost of projects. Overall, Clean Water funded AgBMP loans have leveraged $18,575,534. ",,,"The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. The MDA defines “leveraged” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project. As of December 31, 2019, the total amount of leveraged funds was $18,575,534. ",,45103,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2018,75000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ",,,,,45103,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2017,75000,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Section 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ",,,"The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. The MDA defines “leveraged” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project. ",,33288,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2016,75000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ",,,"Every loan is issued from one of five sources of funds. This includes both federal and state sources. Currently, loans supported by the Clean Water Fund must be used to implement recommended practices identified in a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan.  All other appropriations in the AgBMP account and their revolving revenue may be used anywhere in the state. The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. The MDA defines “leveraged” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project. As of January 18, 2017 the total dollars leveraged was $8,370,202.00. ",,33288,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2015,200000,"M.L.2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (c) $200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $170,000 each year is for transfer to an agricultural and environmental revolving account created under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117, subdivision 5a, and is available for pass-through to local government and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Number of loans issued using monies from the Clean Water Fund (667 loans)Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans (47 counties)Number of loans issued per category: septic systems (542), conservation tillage (28), ag waste management (96)Number of loans addressing subsurface sewage treatment-   Phosphorus load reduction (lbs), TSS load reduction (lbs)Number of loans related to conservation tillage-   Number of acres affected, sediment loss reductions (tons)Number of loans related to agricultural waste management-   Number of animal units managed, total phosphorus managed (tons), total nitrogen managed (tons) Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor progress and impact of the Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Performance Reports in 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of this report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures.The MDA's AgBMP Loan Program  provides data for performance measure EDWOM9: Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions, FM4: Total dollars awarded in grants and contracts to non-state agency partners and FM5: Total dollars leveraged by Clean Water Fund implementation activities. ","As of December 31, 2015 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 667 loans totaling an amount of $12,871,313. Ninety six (96) loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 542 for septic systems upgrades or relocation and 28 for conservation tillage equipment. At this time the program has leveraged 39% of the total cost of projects. Overall, Clean Water funded AgBMP loans have leveraged $8,134,370. The amount reported in FY 15 ($1,636,049) represents dollars leveraged in FY14 and FY15.Estimates of pollutant load reductions are available upon request.  ",,,"Every loan is issued from one of five sources of funds. This includes both federal and state sources. Currently, loans supported by the Clean Water Fund must be used to implement recommended practices identified in a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan. All other appropriations in the AgBMP account and their revolving revenue may be used anywhere in the state. ",,1350,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2014,200000,"M.L.2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (c) $200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $170,000 each year is for transfer to an agricultural and environmental revolving account created under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117, subdivision 5a, and is available for pass-through to local government and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Number of loans issued using monies from the Clean Water FundNumber of counties where individuals are receiving loansNumber of loans issued per category (septic systems, conservation tillage, ag waste management)/ percent issued per categoryNumber of loans addressing subsurface sewage treatment-   Phosphorus load reduction (lbs), TSS load reduction (lbs)Number of loans related to conservation tillage-   Number of acres affected, sediment loss reductions (tons)Number of loans related to agricultural waste management-   Number of animal units managed, total phosphorus managed (tons), total nitrogen managed (tons)  Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor progress and impact of the Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Performance Reports in 2012 and 2014. At the heart of this report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures.The MDA's AgBMP Loan Program provided data for performance measure EDWOM9: Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions, FM4: Total dollars awarded in grants and contracts to non-state agency partners and FM5: Total dollars leveraged by Clean Water Fund implementation activities.  ","As of September 22, 2014 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 456 loans totaling an amount of $9,500,000. Eighty four (84) loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 344 for septic systems upgrades or relocation and 28 for conservation tillage equipment. At this time the program has leveraged 45% of the total cost of projects. Overall, Clean Water funded Ag BMP loans have leveraged $7,500,000.Estimates of pollutant load reductions are avialable upon request. ",,,,,1350,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2013,4500000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(c) $4,500,000 the first year and $4,500,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $3,500,000 the first year and at least $3,900,000 the second year are for transfer to the clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,3261890,,,1350,,"0.5 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2012,4500000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(c) $4,500,000 the first year and $4,500,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $3,500,000 the first year and at least $3,900,000 the second year are for transfer to the clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,2522477,"The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. MDA defines “leverage” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project.As of May 1, 2013, the total amount of leveraged funds was $6,354,833.",,1350,,"0.5 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2011,2500000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (e) $2,000,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are for the agricultural best management practices loan program. At least $1,800,000 the first year and at least $2,200,000 the second year are for transfer to a clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year.","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,,,,2700,,"1 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2010,2000000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (e) $2,000,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are for the agricultural best management practices loan program. At least $1,800,000 the first year and at least $2,200,000 the second year are for transfer to a clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year.","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,,,,2025,,"0.75 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
34090,"American Indian Outreach",2016,70000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","We will continue to evaluate the program based on demonstrated outreach in the community and increased online visibility of our collections catalog. Metrics include the number of events we participate in, the number of visits by Indian elders who consult with us on collections items, and the number of catalog records available to researchers online.",,,,,70000,11099,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",1.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The MNHS permanent collection includes more than 6,500 objects related to American Indian culture and history. MNHS takes seriously its responsibility to provide stewardship of these items, in accordance with federal law (Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act) and our own collections management policy (Culturally Sensitive Objects Policy). For example, in August 2015, MNHS completed a six- to-nine month repatriation of 54 objects to the Bois Forte community in northern Minnesota. In FY15, MNHS began a series of outreach visits to Ojibwe bands in Minnesota to deepen meaningful consultation and strengthen appropriate stewardship of MNHS's culturally sensitive material. Past visits have included Mille Lacs, Leech Lake, and Grand Portage. In FY16, this effort will continue with visits to Fond du Lac and Red Lake. MNHS believes that meaningful partnerships with tribal communities are the key to successful stewardship. In FY16, collections staff has continued to partner with American Indian communities in a number of significant ways, including providing access to collections at the History Center, as well as in communities throughout the state. Outreach efforts include engaging colleagues and community members through participation in a regional conference, the Convening Great Lakes Culture Keepers Regional Institute, supporting indigenous nonprofit organizations (like Twin Cities Native Lacrosse) and facilitating tours for artists, researchers, students, educators, and interested community members. Two highlights this fiscal year include the display of historic and contemporary native material culture at the Owamni/Falling Waters Festival",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/american-indian-outreach,,,,
34105,"American Indian Museum Fellowship",2016,81791,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","100% of students self-identified as diverse; 44% of students reported a very high knowledge of MN History after the program whereas 0% reported that before the program; 44% of students reported appreciation of their own history as very high before the program, 77% after the program. Very high knowledge of the preservation/retention of culture increased from 33% to 67%; An above average or very belief in the ability to pursue a graduate degree increased from 45% to 89%; Responses of very high interest in History increased from 22% to 87%;",,,9000,"Minnesota Indian Affairs Council",81791,8396,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.80,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Partner: Minnesota Indian Affairs Council American Indian undergraduate students from across Minnesota participated in this unique summer educational experience. The students selected for this intensive 17-day residential program attended onsite presentations throughout Minnesota and experienced hands-on learning about the museum and archaeology fields and other historical and cultural preservation organizations. The students also learned about various career paths and academic requirements for working in these types of organizations, both on and off reservations, as well as particular challenges faced by American Indian communities related to preserving tribal heritage.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/american-indian-museum-fellowship-1,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2025,2000000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(e)","$2,000,000 the first year and $2,000,000 the second year are for water-supply planning, aquifer protection, and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds near the City of Warren. Provide technical support for community water supply planning upon request. Continue to populate the Aquifer Properties Database. Continue technical support for three well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Drill 16 groundwater level monitoring wells. North Branch Pipestone Creek Complete numerical flow model and develop model scenarios to support evaluation of groundwater-use management alternatives. Little Rock Creek Area Provide technical support for the Little Rock Creek Water-Use Conflict project, assisting the contractor team with model applications and data requests. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Complete evaluation of the effects of groundwater uses on selected lake water levels. Determine other groundwater and surface-water evaluation objectives and priorities. Review and compare water level data from all DNR observation wells in BVGWMA to sustainability thresholds. North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area Continue to provide technical guidance and support to the DNR GWMA team as needed. Continue providing technical support for the White Bear Lake Area Comprehensive Plan Work Group (Metropolitan Council) and the Project 1007 contamination investigation and remediation project (MPCA) through model analyses and data requests. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2024,2000000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(e)","$2,000,000 the first year and $2,000,000 the second year are for water-supply planning, aquifer protection, and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds near the City of Warren. Continue technical support for community water supply planning. Continue technical support for new well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Continue support for Aquifer Properties Database. Continue to support Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies. Drill 15 groundwater level monitoring wells. Develop analytical tools to assess water availability and identify areas that are at greater risk of overuse. Little Rock Creek Area Continue to provide technical support to the DNR team working with stakeholders on resolving the water-use conflict and implementing the Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area action plan. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Complete the regional and local-area (focused on the Bangor Waterfowl Production Area), numerical flow models. Evaluate the effects of groundwater uses on basin water levels and surface area relative to scenarios without groundwater use in the area surrounding the basins. Work with the DNR GWMA team to refine groundwater and surface-water evaluation objectives and priorities. North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area Continue to provide technical guidance and support to the DNR GWMA team as needed. Continue to participate in review of projects closely related to GWMA management objectives, including but not limited to Project 1007 contamination investigation modeling (MPCA) and Landlocked Basin Comprehensive Planning Study (Valley Branch Watershed District). "," Continued monitoring water levels in the City of Crookston well field. Coordination and technical support for Moorhead Public Services regarding groundwater use concerns. Evaluation and resolution of 4 well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Drilled 33 new groundwater level monitoring wells. Updated Groundwater Trends analysis for period 2003-2022. Continued populating the Aquifer Properties database. North Branch Pipestone Creek Developed a conceptual model for construction of a groundwater-flow model to investigate aquifer sustainability and surface water-groundwater interaction. Began design and construction of the numerical groundwater-flow model. Little Rock Creek Area                              Continued to provide technical support to the DNR team working with stakeholders on resolving the water-use conflict and implementing the Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area action plan. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Completed a preliminary version of the regional numerical flow model. Began evaluation of the effects of groundwater uses on selected lake water levels. Continued to work with the DNR GWMA team to refine groundwater and surface-water evaluation objectives and priorities. North & East Metro Groundwater Management Area Continued to provide technical guidance and support to the DNR GWMA team as needed. Continued providing review and/or technical support for projects closely related to GWMA management objectives, including but not limited to Project 1007 contamination investigation modeling (MPCA), Landlocked Basin Comprehensive Planning Study (Valley Branch Watershed District), and White Bear Lake Area Comprehensive Plan Work Group (Metropolitan Council).   ",,,,2279549,283976,,11.9,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2023,1850000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(e)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Little Rock Creek: Finalize the scenarios-analysis report and continue to provide technical support as DNR works with permit holders to reduce base-flow impacts. Continue populating the Aquifer Properties database.  LCCMR has provided funds to accelerate this program.  Existing staff will continue to support this project with technical review and analysis. Provide groundwater technical reviews for City of Goodview, City of Corcoran, and City of Rogers water supply plans. Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds for aquifers serving Ham Lake domestic wells and Blaine municipal wells. Provide groundwater technical support for local efforts to develop conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water by high volume water users in counties along the Minnesota/South/North Dakota borders. Finalize groundwater sustainability report for aquifers near City of Warren and Marshall-Polk Rural Water System.  Report will focus on local groundwater water availability, developing groundwater sustainability limits, groundwater level water level monitoring needs, and water supply resilience. Completion of nine Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) reports. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area: Adjust the Soil-Water-Budget model to improve the groundwater-flow model.  Construct steady-state and transient versions of a regional groundwater-flow model and develop a local sub-model for at least one focus area. Drill 12 groundwater level monitoring wells. "," Ongoing technical support for community water supply planning, notably for growing metro-area communities Technical support to protect City of Warren water supply through delineation of aquifer extent and thickness and evaluation of groundwater levels compared to historic groundwater use Evaluation and resolution of 50 well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Drilled 13 new groundwater level monitoring wells. Completed 3 GRAPS reports. Little Rock Creek Area                                                                                              Completed the report entitled, “Evaluation of Conceptual Groundwater-Use Management Actions, Little Rock Creek Area.” Provided technical support for establishing sustainable diversion limits for Little Rock Creek and to the DNR team working with stakeholders on implementing the Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area action plan. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Made improvements to the Soil Water Balance (SWB) model code and refined the SWB model for the BV area. Extracted SWB computed aerial recharge, runoff to sinks, and runoff to lakes and formatted for input to the MODFLOW groundwater-flow model. Constructed a regional, steady-state l MODFLOW model for the BV area and made model refinements and improvements. Updated observations data sets. Began building a transient model and local-area model focused on the Bangor Waterfowl Production Area North & East Metro Groundwater Management Area Participated in meetings and reviewed and provided feedback on technical documents for external projects closely related to GWMA management objectives: Project 1007 contamination investigation modeling (MPCA) and Landlocked Basin Comprehensive Planning Study (Valley Branch Watershed District). Provided technical guidance and support to the GWMA management team. ",,,,1234372,269724,,12.2,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2022,1850000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(e)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Little Rock Creek: Develop and evaluate scenarios that test concepts to reduce/mitigate streamflow diversions. Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds near the City of Warren. Continue populating the Aquifer Properties database. Continue technical support for community water supply planning. Continue support for the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) program. Bonanza Valley GWMA: Begin construction of groundwater flow model that incorporates surface hydrological inputs and characterizes groundwater recharge and evapotranspiration. Drill nine groundwater level monitoring wells. "," Little Rock Creek Area:  Delineated the estimated extent of influence of groundwater-sourced irrigation on stream base flow Developed and analyzed model scenarios to explore each of four types of management actions outlined in the Little Rock Creek Area management plan: 1) augmentation of low streamflow with well water, 2) wider adoption of water conservation practices, 3) replacing irrigation wells close to the stream network with more distant wells, and 4) reductions in permitted use (via targeted reductions in acres irrigated). Produces a technical a report describing the results of model-scenario analyses and how the results can be used to inform water-appropriations management. Continued enhanced groundwater monitoring, including permittee owned observation wells continues in the LRC area. Technical support to protect City of Warren water supply through preparation of geologic and hydrogeologic tools, development of a groundwater monitoring plan, and crafting water level thresholds for nearby high-capacity irrigation appropriators. 38 aquifer test reports were added to the Aquifer Properties database. Groundwater technical support for development of Marshall-Polk Rural Water System’s Water Supply Plan and Well Head Protection Plan. Continue support for the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) program. Hydrographs and trends were completed for 4 watersheds, with 86 hydrographs produced. Water use data were compiled for all 11 1W1P areas. One GRAPs report was completed. Created new statewide GIS hydrography feature class: Groundwater Dominated Lakes. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area: Updated the Quaternary geological model using newly available well-records data. Developed a draft Soil Water Balance (SWB) model for the area.  Modeled ET and irrigation demand based on two years of reported results for an ongoing field study at the Rosholt Research Farm (located in the GWMA) using both the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and SWB. Developed a conceptual model for construction of the groundwater-flow model. Began design and construction of the numerical groundwater-flow model. Drilled 6 new groundwater level monitoring wells. ",,,,1499159,219410,,11.6,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2021,2075000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$2075000 the first year and $2075000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY21 DNR staff will: Evaluate pumping scenarios using the LRC groundwater model. Investigate water level sustainability issues near Warren MN. Continue populating the Aquifer Properties database. Continue technical support for community water supply planning. Continue support for the GRAPs program. Provide modeling support to Moorhead's well field expansion. Initiate groundwater model construction of the Bonanza Valley GWMA. Drill 12 groundwater level monitoring wells. Support Rochester's modeling and calcareous fen protection strategy. ","FY21 Measurable Outcomes: Finalized the Little Rock Creek hydrologic analyses report. Performed a series of tests and scenarios to explore the relationship between existing pumping locations and computed streamflow diversions. Added 228 aquifer tests to the Aquifer Properties database. Prioritization supports the County Geologic Atlas program and Groundwater Management Areas. Reviewed 16 groundwater-based community water supply plans. Updated well locations glacial geology and hydrography data sets for the Bonanza Valley GWMA. Completed the groundwater availability portion of four GRAPS reports. Created 87 hydrographs comparing groundwater levels to reported pumping volumes and climate data within eight GRAPS watersheds. Installed 14 groundwater level monitoring wells across five counties. Carried out a series of White Bear Lake direct-withdrawal scenarios to support determining a maximum collective annual withdrawal from WBL. Developed 2040 N&E Metro pumping scenarios with alternative water sources for several communities. ",,,,1404654,193468,,12.5,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2020,2075000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$2075000 the first year and $2075000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY20 DNR staff will: Evaluate pumping scenarios using the updated Little Rock Creek groundwater model. Populate the Aquifer Properties database. Incorporate groundwater level data into the draft Polk/Red Lake county border aquifer sustainability monitoring plan. Develop water level thresholds as needed. Continue providing high level technical support for communities developing water supply plans. Update the statewide “changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis incorporating water level data collected through 2019. Initiate data compilation for a groundwater model in Dakota County. Coordinate model development with county and Met Council staff. Continue support of the GRAPs program. Compile existing data develop work plans and initiate construction of a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. Install approximately 20 new monitoring wells in greater Minnesota. ","In FY20 DNR staff: Incorporated 2014-2018 streamflow and pumping data into the Little Rock Creek (LRC) groundwater model. Added 193 aquifer tests to the Aquifer Properties database. Prioritization supports the County Geologic Atlas program and Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA). Red Lake/Polk County groundwater level and pumping data were used to develop water level thresholds for the Crookston municipal well field. Reviewed 23 groundwater based community water supply plans. Updated the statewide “Changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis using water level data collected through 2019. Participated in meetings with Dakota county staff to define modeling objectives. Began data compilation and model boundary development for Bonanza Valley GWMA. Checked and updated 517 well locations for the Bonanza Valley GWMA. Completed the groundwater availability portion of six GRAPS reports. Created 53 hydrographs comparing groundwater levels to reported pumping volumes and climate data within nine GRAPS watersheds. Installed 18 groundwater level monitoring wells. Developed a 2040 pumping-demand scenario and evaluated the impact to White Bear Lake. Analyzed drawdown for hypothetical Mt. Simon aquifer pumping in White Bear Lake and White Bear Twp. Archived over 700 000 groundwater level and temperature readings from Straight River GWMA observation wells. ",,,,1367151,238627,,11.4,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2019,1375000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY19 DNR staff will: • Incorporate monitoring data from 2014 through 2018 into the Little Rock Creek groundwater model. • Populate the Aquifer Properties database. • Develop a groundwater monitoring plan to address well interference and aquifer sustainability issues along the Polk/Red Lake county border. • Continue providing technical support for communities developing water supply plans. • Update the statewide “changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis. • Continue groundwater modeling with the City of Moorhead. • Continue providing technical support and review to the City of Rochester for groundwater modeling and water supply analysis. • Apply the North Metro Lakes Groundwater Model in support of the Ramsey County District Court Order and water supply planning in the area. • Initiate data compilation for a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. • Collaborate with Dakota County to develop groundwater management strategies to address contamination and sustainability concerns related to surface water ecosystems. • Add approximately 10 new monitoring wells. ","In FY19 DNR staff: • Completed the groundwater availability portion of Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategy (GRAPS) reports for three major watersheds—Hawk Creek Redeye River and the Zumbro River. • Updated and analyzed 65 hydrographs that compare groundwater levels to reported pumping volumes and climate data within nine watersheds for GRAPS. • Compiled 1500 files for inclusion in the Aquifer Properties database. • Provided groundwater technical reviews of 33 water supply plans for communities throughout MN. • Developed a draft monitoring plan for the Red Lake/Polk County area. Groundwater levels will be tracked using a combination of permittee monitoring and DNR network wells. • Evaluated pumping scenarios using an updated groundwater model for the City of Moorhead groundwater expansion from the Buffalo Aquifer. • Compilation of existing data and project scoping has begun for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area groundwater model. • Completed technical report describing construction of the groundwater model for Little Rock Creek area. Preparation of input data for 2014-2018 monitoring has started. • Continued providing technical support and review to the City of Rochester for groundwater modeling and water supply analysis. • Conducted multiple model runs using the North & East Metro Groundwater Model in support of the Ramsey County District Court Order and to investigate potential impacts by large water appropriators outside the 5-mile radius defined by the Court. • Groundwater staff assessed the groundwater level network needs in six counties and three rural communities. No new monitoring wells were added in FY19 (with this funding source). • Preliminary meetings with Dakota county to define modeling objectives were held this past year. Construction of the groundwater model has been on hold pending completion of the revised Geologic Atlas and completion of other groundwater models. ",,,,1080994,158103,,11.4,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2018,1375000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY18 the DNR plans to drill 26 additional groundwater monitoring wells. Also in FY18 DNR staff will: • Finish the Little Rock Creek groundwater model and begin using it to test various management scenarios. • Start developing a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. • Finish developing the Aquifer Properties database and work with the MN Department of Health to enter information currently scattered across numerous state and federal agencies. • Participate in six aquifer tests to guide permit staff who are addressing well interferences and aquifer sustainability issues near the city of Mentor. • Continue responding to requests for technical support from communities that are developing water supply plans. ","In FY18 DNR staff: • Completed the groundwater availability portion of Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategy (GRAPS) reports for five major watersheds—Cannon Missouri Lower St. Croix Watonwan and Sauk. • Finished programming the Aquifer Properties database. • Located and updated 1 400 well site locations in Mille Lacs Steele Cook Pennington and Dakota counties for use in county geologic atlas work by the Minnesota Geological Survey. • Provided groundwater technical reviews of 20 water supply plans for communities throughout MN. • Conducted eight aquifer tests in support of water supply issues including well interferences near Mentor. • Started groundwater modeling for the City of Moorhead groundwater expansion from the Buffalo Aquifer. • Provided technical support and review to the City of Rochester for groundwater modeling and water supply analysis. • Continued input of historical water chemistry data (over 6 000 samples) and streamlined input of new chemistry data into the EquIS database. • Initiated scoping for groundwater modeling in the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area; • Completed the initial groundwater model for Little Rock Creek area. • Completed revisions and updates for the North Metro Lakes Groundwater Model. • No new monitoring wells were added in FY18 (with this funding source) due to limited resources and the high demand for modeling and other technical analyses. ",,,,1405812,151962,,14.2,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2017,1375000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","(e) $1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY17 staff will install 55 additional wells in areas of concern or to fill gaps and replace nonfunctioning wells in the long term statewide network. Staff will also continue enhancing the processing and accessibility of groundwater network data. Enhancements will include streamlining the gathering storage and online accessibility of data for required groundwater monitoring permits in the 11-county metro and outstate areas with high groundwater appropriation volumes. We will continue to provide technical support for communities developing water supply plans. We will also continue to provide training for soil and water conservation district staff in FY16.","In FY17 DNR staff oversaw the drilling of 51 observation wells including new wells and replacement of nonfunctioning wells. This brought the number of active groundwater monitoring locations in the network to 1 035 of which 599 are measured continuously by data loggers. Staff compiled and finalized continuous records for approximately 300 groundwater observation locations. Also in FY17 DNR staff: • Developed a groundwater model for Little Rock Creek incorporating information about surface water/groundwater interactions from newly completed staff analysis of data from six aquifer tests. Staff also began testing the model’s sensitivity and incorporating recommendations from an external technical advisory committee. • Transferred all historical water chemistry data collected by the County Geologic Atlas group into the EQuiS database. • Started developing an Aquifer Properties database. • Created a GIS database to catalog historical well interferences. When complete the database will facilitate access to records about interference complaints technical investigations and resolutions. • Conducted “Groundwater 101” training for several Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs). • Provided technical support on request to communities facing water supply sustainability issues including the City of Rochester and Moorhead Public Service. • Updated the statewide “changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis to include an additional 45 wells (for a new total of 341 wells) over the time period of 1997-2016.",,,,1116062,145513,,11.3,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2016,1375000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","(e) $1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY16 the DNR will install an additional 50 wells in priority areas of concern and continue to refine the process to compile and deliver data. We will do this by adding a web-based input system for data from cooperators (Soil and Water Conservation Districts and Cities) and upgrade the website so the public can access groundwater data. We will continue to work with our partners at the MPCA MDH MDA BWSR MGS and Metropolitan Council to make groundwater data sharable and available between agencies. We will also continue migrating chemistry data from the Geologic Atlas Program to the EQuIS database. We will continue to work with our partners at other Agencies and MN.IT to establish shared data governance standards. We will continue developing groundwater sustainability thresholds. These thresholds will be used to identify problems that could by caused by groundwater pumping for certain lakes rivers and wetlands that depend on groundwater. When completed these thresholds will be used to help us make individual permit decisions about groundwater appropriations. We will finish building a computer model for groundwater in the Little Rock Creek area We will continue to provide technical support for communities developing water supply plans. For example we will work with Moorhead on its analysis of the Buffalo Aquifer and the role it plays in Moorhead’s water supply planning. We will also continue to provide training for soil and water conservation district staff in FY16. We will conduct nine aquifer tests to provide information about regional aquifer information needs and our aquifer test database will become operational in FY16. ","In FY16 DNR staff installed 117 wells instrumented 18 wells with available equipment and processed 196 continuous groundwater well records. Staff also completed the planned integrated data input system allowing cooperators and remotely deployed staff to enter data online. We refined the website making it easier for the public to access data and see recently collected raw data within two days of downloading from network wells. Data processing was also streamlined to provide approved and final data sooner than previous years. DNR staff continued efforts to develop a groundwater model for Little Rock Creek and involved an external technical advisory committee in the process. Staff investigated water supply issues near the City of LaSalle related to cumulative impacts from expanded crop irrigation and reviewed cumulative pumping impacts to the Union Creek watershed. The latter effort helped guide permitting decisions and identify groundwater monitoring sites. DNR staff participated on an interagency water data governance team which developed two proposals to improve data governance and sharing among agencies. DNR with support from MDH MDA MPCA hosted groundwater educational workshops in four areas of the state. These workshops for Soil and Water Conservation District staff were well attended and highly regarded by the attendees.",,,,1545948,144234,,12.8,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2015,1375000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY15 The DNR will continue enhancing its groundwater monitoring network and data management system and decision-making abilities. -We will continue development of Standard Evaluation Procedures that will be used for the establishment of groundwater sustainability thresholds and identifying adverse impacts to groundwater-dependent surface water features. -Observation Well Network Enhancement. The DNR will install approximately 65 new observation wells in areas of the state that are experiencing increasing water use or concerns about water levels including municipal water supplies for small communities. -Observation Well Network Management. We will maintain or seal the current wells in the observation well network which are not currently being used due to poor performance. -Hydrology Data Project. In FY15 chemistry data from the Geologic Atlas Program will be incorporated into the Hydrology Data Domain system to provide greater access to the data for users of the data. Data currently in paper files will be entered into databases. -Ground Water Data Website. A map-based website will be developed to provide easy access to groundwater elevation information and other hydrology data. -We will continue to provide technical support for communities developing water supply plans including the cities of Rochester and Moorhead and others. -We will continue to provide technical analysis of existing information and assessments for Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA): North and East Metro GWMA Straight River GWMA and Bonanza Valley GWMA.","In FY15 the DNR enhanced its groundwater monitoring network and data collection network by installing 165 new groundwater level monitoring wells and equipped 203 wells with devices that record water levels every 15 minutes. We compiled 61 annual continuous water level records across the state. We are working with our agency partners to develop statewide systems for entering managing and sharing water and climate data for Minnesota’s state and local governments that generate and use this data. With Clean Water Funds we developed a new quality assurance process for our groundwater level data and transferred it to a cooperative DNR/MPCA database and we launched a new cooperative groundwater monitoring website which provides access to all available groundwater level data from over 950 DNR- operated observation wells. We worked to develop groundwater sustainability thresholds which will be used to identify problems that could be caused by groundwater pumping for certain lakes rivers and wetlands that depend on groundwater. We also worked with 24 communities to develop or review and approve water supply plans. We provided training for soil and water conservation district staff across Minnesota. This training significantly increased local government’s knowledge and understanding of groundwater and highlighted the need for more resources to manage groundwater at the local level. We conducted eight aquifer tests (focused investigations that help estimate the potential impacts from high capacity pumping from water supply wells) to learn more about regional water sustainability issues. We are also creating an interagency aquifer test database in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Health which uses aquifer tests to evaluate and establish drinking water wellhead protection areas. ",,,,1246904,154895,,10.8,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2014,1375000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY14 DNR will continue to enhance its groundwater monitoring network and data management system. The DNR will begin development of Standard Evaluation Procedures which will be used for the establishment of groundwater sustainability thresholds. -Observation Well Network Enhancement. DNR will install approximately 65 new observation wells in the State. These new wells will be placed in both new locations as well as in existing areas to service under represented areas and to replace damaged or poorly performing wells. Some of the wells are designated as “sentinel monitoring wells” because they provide signals of when groundwater pumping is adversely affecting surface water bodies. -Observation Well Network Assessment and Management. DNR completed the statewide assessment of observation wells and will maintain or seal the current wells in the observation well network which are not currently being used due to poor performance. -Hydrology Data Domain Project. Scoping and initial development will be completed for the Hydrology Data Domain Project. This project will integrate and provide easy access to hydrologic data used in well appropriation decisions and permitting decision-making. Monitoring information will include groundwater elevation data groundwater contamination data surface water data (lakes streams wetlands) climatology data as well as other hydrologic data. Data will include monitoring information from DNR MPCA MDA Met Council and MDH. -Ground Water Data Website. Development will initiated for a map-based Ground Water Data Website which will be designed to provide easy and direct access to groundwater elevation information for all DNR Observation Wells.","In FY14 DNR enhanced its groundwater monitoring network and data collection network by installing 40 new groundwater level monitoring wells equipped with devices that record water levels every 15 minutes. This information is used to evaluate the effect of groundwater pumping on water levels. -The statewide observation well assessment project was completed in FY14. -Groundwater Monitoring Network Enhancement - Completed a monitoring plan with locations for 75 new monitoring wells (outside of the 11-county metro area). -DNR led multi-Agency efforts to conduct “synoptic surveys” to collect water levels in hundreds of domestic water supply wells monitoring wells and lakes for the North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area in the vicinity of White Bear Lake. -Hydrology Data Project. Developed conceptual plan to integrate hydrologic data and provide easy access to data for analysis related to appropriation permit decisions. Monitoring information will include groundwater elevation data groundwater chemistry and contamination data surface water data (lakes streams wetlands) and various climatology data from DNR MPCA MDA Met Council and MDH. -Provided technical support for communities developing water supply plans including the cities of Rochester and Moorhead. -Provided technical analysis of existing information and assessments for Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs): North and East Metro GWMA Straight River GWMA and Bonanza Valley GWMA.",,,,1149106,257141,,12.6,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2013,1500000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1500000 the first year and $1500000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY13 DNR will increase data collection in potential Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs): * Complete geophysical surveys in two potential GWMAs to increase understanding of aquifer characteristics. * DNR with support of other organizations will complete synoptic measurements of groundwater levels in three potential GWMAs. * Work on aquifer models will be initiated for two areas of concern. * DNR will finalize reporting for statewide DNR observation well assessment. Public Communications on Resource Management & Sustainability * DNR will lead or participate in meetings with stakeholders and interagency staff for areas of concern where long-term sustainability of groundwater use is being evaluated. * DNR will assess the feasibility of bringing water supply planning assistance to communities (populations of less than 1000) not previously encouraged nor required to prepare water supply plans. * DNR will move toward designation of two or more groundwater management areas.","In FY13 DNR enhanced its groundwater monitoring network and data collection network by installing 65 new groundwater level monitoring wells equipped with devises which record water levels every 15 minutes. This information is used to evaluate the effect of groundwater pumping on water levels. The statewide observation well assessment project was also completed in FY13. DNR also led multi-Agency efforts to conduct “synoptic surveys ” in which water levels in hundreds of domestic water supply wells monitoring wells and lakes are measured in one day. Synoptic surveys were completed for the North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area and for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. Finally DNR completed groundwater models in the Straight River and Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Areas. The models evaluated options for perimeter boundaries for the Straight River and Bonanza Valley areas. Geological cross sections needed for three-dimensional mapping was also done for portions of the Straight River and Bonanza Valley areas. DNR also participated on the technical advisory committee for the development of the Metro Model 3 a groundwater-flow model of the greater Twin Cities Metropolitan Area.",,,,854617,140787,,10.0,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2012,1500000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1500000 the first year and $1500000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY12 DNR will participate in or lead meetings with stakeholders and interagency staff in four groundwater management areas. Staff will also: * prepare paper files for data mining: review sort and scan 10 linear feet of hard copy files from ethanol projects and groundwater areas of interest to electronic format; * achieve significant progress with data-mining and work planning on six of the ranked groundwater management areas; and * assess the feasibility of bringing water supply planning assistance to communities not previously encouraged nor required to prepare water supply plans.","In FY12 DNR led and participated in stakeholder meetings with interagency staff cities counties and local organizations to evaluate and advance the concept of groundwater management areas (GWMA) in seven resource critical areas of the state. Based on DNR’s technical review of the groundwater/surface water resources and current and future use two areas were identified for potential designation by the Commissioner of the DNR as groundwater management areas. DNR worked with agency partners to finalize locations for 10 new observation well nests (2 wells in each nest) in three potential groundwater management areas. Additionally DNR instrumented over 100 observation wells in geographic areas of concern with state-of-the-art data loggers for continuous water level monitoring. To get more and better information about groundwater in three areas of concern the DNR along with many partner organizations completed an intensive effort to measure groundwater levels in over 400 wells and over 80 lake levels within a span of 9 days. Data mining was completed for groundwater areas of concern. DNR reviewed sorted and scanned over 10 linear feet of hard copy files from ethanol projects and groundwater areas of concern to electronic format.",,,,715316,239944,,7.0,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2011,525000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$600000 the first year and $525000 the second year are for drinking water planning and protection activities.","In FY11 DNR will work with other agencies to complete a statewide interagency review and ranking process for areas of critical groundwater use.","In FY11 DNR completed a statewide interagency review and ranking process for areas of critical groundwater use and participated in the Interagency Groundwater and Drinking Water Team’s assessment of a statewide process to evaluate risks to the water table aquifer. Scientists also created an updated statewide map of shallow aquifer vulnerability. Staff conducted meetings with interested parties and interagency staff in three potential groundwater management areas (South Washington County White Bear Lake and Little Rock Creek) and continued less formal discussions with user groups and local governmental units in two other potential groundwater management areas in Clay and Hubbard Counties.",,,,687305,32400,,5.0,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2010,600000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$600000 the first year and $525000 the second year are for drinking water planning and protection activities.","In FY10 DNR will complete a statewide assessment to identify areas with existing and potential water supply issues. Staff will also define the scope of work for studies and monitoring for 20 communities with existing or potential water supply issues and work with stakeholder groups on the development of aquifer management plans in two pilot areas.","In FY10 DNR worked with agency partners to assess and rank areas with potential water supply issues. The team chose 20 areas (8 non-metro and 12 metro) for trial evaluation of level of effort needed to establish a groundwater management area and collect adequate data to develop aquifer management plans and completed scoping process for the 8 non-metro areas. Staff conducted significant monitoring and held stakeholder meetings to lay the groundwork for aquifer management plans in two pilot areas: Moorhead and Bonanza Valley (Brooten-Belgrade area).",,,,228781,13785,,,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
34100,"We Are Hmong Minnesota",2016,102564,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","146,724 people visited the History Center Museum during the run of We Are Hmong in FY15-16. The Net Promoter Score was +71 over a goal of +50 or higher. Visitation by people of Asian heritage was 10%, a tenfold increase over 2014. 91% of visitors rated the History Center ""Excellent"" or ""Very Good"" during the run of We Are Hmong.",,,,,102564,2993,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.30,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","We Are Hmong Minnesota, a 2,500-square-foot exhibit, debuted March 7, 2015, timed for the celebration of the 40th anniversary of the beginning of Hmong migration to Minnesota. MNHS staff worked in partnership with the Hmong community to develop the exhibit. A traveling version of the exhibit for loan to libraries, schools, and community centers was also developed and is currently circulating. A companion exhibit at the James J. Hill House displayed a collection of Hmong textiles recently donated to the Minnesota Historical Society. A new website aggregating collections and educational resources is now available at www.mnhs.org/hmong. The exhibit run was extended through Jan. 3, 2016, due to high demand. Initiating a new collaborative model, MNHS produced a marketing campaign designed in cooperation with members of the local Hmong community, which resulted in strong attendance by first-time visitors to the Minnesota History Center in FY15. More than 3,500 people attended on the exhibit's opening day, March 7, 2015, 75 percent of whom self-identified as Asian/Pacific American. The exhibit garnered impressive media coverage locally and nationally.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/we-are-hmong-minnesota,,,,
33082,"Arts and Cultural Heritage Children's Museums (State Fiscal Years 2016 and 2017)",2016,23500,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$950,000 each year is for arts and cultural heritage grants to children's museums.Of this amount, $500,000 each year is for the Minnesota Children's Museum, including the Minnesota Children's Museum in Rochester; $150,000 each year is for the Duluth Children's Museum; $150,000 each year is for the Grand Rapids Children's Museum; and $150,000 each year is for the Southern Minnesota Children's Museum.",N/A,N/A,,,,,,,,,"Non-Profit Business/Entity","Per Minnesota Law, the Minnesota Humanities Center administers the Arts and Cultural Heritage Children's Museum Grants. The Humanities Center uses a portion of the funds to provide grants administration, including overseeing the proposal process, agreement drafting, financial and program monitoring, and reporting. ",,,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Laura,Benson,"Minnesota Humanities Center","987 Ivy Avenue East","Saint Paul",MN,55106,"(651) 772-4244",laura@mnhum.org,"Fund Administration","Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/arts-and-cultural-heritage-childrens-museums-state-fiscal-years-2016-and-2017,,,,
33082,"Arts and Cultural Heritage Children's Museums (State Fiscal Years 2016 and 2017)",2017,22770,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$950,000 each year is for arts and cultural heritage grants to children's museums. Of this amount, $500,000 each year is for the Minnesota Children's Museum, including the Minnesota Children's Museum in Rochester; $150,000 each year is for the Duluth Children's Museum; $150,000 each year is for the Grand Rapids Children's Museum; and $150,000 each year is for the Southern Minnesota Children's Museum. Note: Minnesota Management and Budget (MMB) informed all granting agencies that the February 2016 Legacy budget forecast identified deficits in the current biennium in the Arts and Cultural Heritage fund. 3% of all grantees' allocations are being held back until additional forecasting has been completed. This includes a reduction in the administrative fees taken by the Minnesota Humanities Center. ","N/A ","N/A ",,,,,,,,,"Non-Profit Business/Entity","Per Minnesota Law, the Minnesota Humanities Center administers the Arts and Cultural Heritage Children's Museum Grants. The Humanities Center uses a portion of the funds to provide grants administration, including overseeing the proposal process, agreement drafting, financial and program monitoring, and reporting. ",,,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Laura,Benson,"Minnesota Humanities Center","987 Ivy Avenue East","Saint Paul",MN,55106,"(651) 772-4244",laura@mnhum.org,"Fund Administration","Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/arts-and-cultural-heritage-childrens-museums-state-fiscal-years-2016-and-2017,,,,
33083,"Arts and Cultural Heritage - Heritage Program (State Fiscal Years 2016 and 2017)",2016,4000,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$300,000 the first year is for a competitive grants program to provide grants to preserve and promote the cultural heritage of Minnesota.Of this amount, $50,000 in the first year is for a grant to the city of St. Paul to plan and design a garden to commemorate unrepresented cultural gardens in Phalen Park in the city of St. Paul and $150,000 in the first year is for a grant to Ramsey County to develop and install activity facilities in Ramsey County parks for culturally relevant games that are reflective of the current demographics in Ramsey County.The Minnesota Humanities Center shall operate a competitive grants program to provide grants for programs, including but not limited to: music, film, television, radio, recreation, or the design and use of public spaces that preserves and honors the cultural heritage of Minnesota. Grants made under this paragraph must not be used for travel costs inside or outside of the state.",N/A,N/A,,,,,,,,,"Non-Profit Business/Entity","Per Minnesota Law, the Minnesota Humanities Center administers programs, named and competitive, related to cultural heritage in Minnesota. The Humanities Center uses a portion of the funds to provide grants administration, including overseeing the proposal process, agreement drafting, financial and program monitoring, and reporting.",,,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Benson,"Minnesota Humanities Center","987 Ivy Avenue East","Saint Paul",Minnesota,55106,"(651) 772-4244",laura@mnhum.org,"Fund Administration","Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/arts-and-cultural-heritage-heritage-program-state-fiscal-years-2016-and-2017,"Sakinah MujahidSakinah Mujahid has been actively involved in social services work for over six years. She currently serves as the Associate Program Manager for BEACON Families Moving Forward Program Southwest, a program working to help end homelessness in Scott and Carver Counties. Prior to beginning her involvement with social services, Sakinah, who is a third-generation Muslim, served 13 years in the U.S. Army. After leaving the military, she began working as a volunteer at Sisters Need a Place (“SNAP”), a non-profit organization dedicated to helping to meet the economic and spiritual needs of Muslim women and their families. Sakinah’s dedication and commitment to that mission has led her to currently serve as SNAP’s Executive Director. Diane TranDiane Tran is a Senior Project Manager at Grassroots Solutions, a national consulting firm specializing in grassroots strategy, organizing, training, and evaluation. She also directs Minnesota field activities for the Pew Charitable Trusts’ program to advance federal clean energy policies. Previously, Diane coordinated a local public health advocacy campaign to advance the Minnesota Freedom to Breathe Act of 2007. She serves on the advisory boards of Civic Leadership Initiative Online (CLIO) and the Defense Alliance and is Chair of the board of directors for the Citizens League. She is the author of the children's book, Linh and the Red Envelope. In addition to her other activities, Diane blogs about active citizenship, emerging leadership, and the ‘Millennial’ generation at www.MinnesotaRising.org. Scott GlewScott joined the Minnesota Army National Guard during his senior year of high school in September 2001.  After eight years of service, including a deployment to Iraq in 2007-08, he began his career as a social studies teacher at Salk Middle School in Elk River.  Scott is dedicated to creating an enjoyable classroom environment where students are challenged to use history, civics, geography, and economics to deepen their understanding of the world and make a difference.  Beyond the classroom, he serves on the boards of directors for the Minnesota Council for History Education and the Minnesota Council for the Social Studies, and conducts graduate research on citizenship and peace at the University of Minnesota. Ashley LaganiereAshley Laganiere is a third generation Army veteran and spouse, and has a strong passion for serving Minnesota veterans.  After subbing in the Rochester Public School district for a year, Ashley assumed a position with the United States Department of Veterans Affairs St. Paul Regional Office.  In addition to Ashley’s claims work, she was heavily involved in mentoring St. Paul employees and training new employees on the national level.  Ashley has since obtained a Master of Public and Nonprofit Administration from Metropolitan State University.  In order for Ashley to satisfy her desire to be a true advocate for Minnesota veterans, Ashley left VA in November 2014 to assume the responsibilities of Gold Star Families and Women Veterans Coordinator position with MDVA.Ezekiel JoubertEzekiel Joubert III is a PhD student at the University of Minnesota in the Curriculum and Instruction department, program Culture and Teaching. His research interests are critical pedagogies, youth and child development, and education at the intersections of rurality and race. As a special education teacher, he used narrative and identity to develop and empower students, and works to find ways for students to engage in cultural memories and histories. ",,,2
33298,"Arts and Cultural Heritage Grants Program-Civics Education (State Fiscal Years 2016-2017)",2016,2400,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$150,000 each year is for grants to the Minnesota Civic Education Coalition: Kids Voting St. Paul, the Learning Law and Democracy Foundation, and YMCA Youth in Government to conduct civics education programs for the civic and cultural development of Minnesota youth. Civics education is the study of constitutional principles and the democratic foundation of our national, state, and local institutions and the study of political processes and structures of government, grounded in the under-standing of constitutional government under the rule of law.",N/A,N/A,,,,,,,,,"Non-Profit Business/Entity","During the 2015 Legislative Session, the Minnesota State Legislature asked the Minnesota Humanities Center to award arts and cultural heritage grants to civics organizations. Legacy funds are appropriated to the Humanities Center to support such work. A small portion of each appropriation was reserved by the Humanities Center for direct expenses related to administering the grant. Should any portion of this reserve be unused, the difference will be awarded to the respective organizations.",,,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Benson,"Minnesota Humanities Center","987 Ivy Avenue East","Saint Paul",Minnesota,55106-2046,"(651) 772-4244",laura@mnhum.org,"Fund Administration","Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/arts-and-cultural-heritage-grants-program-civics-education-state-fiscal-years-2016-2017,,,,
10004456,"Assessing Contaminants in Minnesota Loons and Pelicans - Phase III",2016,141000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03j","$141,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources to continue to assess the potential impact of petroleum, dispersants, and heavy metal contaminants from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico on the wintering habitat of Minnesota's common loons and white pelicans using radiotelemetry, geolocators, and contaminant analysis.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"MN DNR","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03j.pdf,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund",Completed,,,Carrol,Henderson,"MN DNR","500 Lafayette Rd, Box 25","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5104",carrol.henderson@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/assessing-contaminants-minnesota-loons-and-pelicans-phase-iii-0,,,,
34095,"Beyond Bollywood",2016,100106,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Outcome goals: MHC attendance greater than 200,000 in FY16, and greater than 45,000 during the run of Beyond Bollywood. Net Promoter Score goal +50 or higher. Increased interest in and appreciation for Minnesota history. Increased awareness of MNHS and its programs.",,,,,100106,8611,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.80,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","This traveling exhibit from the Smithsonian Institution chronicles the history and experiences of Indian Americans in the United States. A Minnesota-themed extension will augment the exhibit, which opens April 30, 2016, containing artifacts that illustrate stories of Indian Americans in Minnesota and their contributions, culture, and accomplishments. The Minnesota section will be co-created by representatives of the state's Indian American community, who will advise MNHS on a community-based marketing strategy. Specific communication to the local Indian audience will be enhanced with marketing to the general public through media relations and social media, as well advertising in print, digital, broadcast, and outdoor mediums.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/beyond-bollywood,,,,
10004478,"Biofilm Technology for Water Nutrient Removal",2016,281000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 04b","$281,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to develop a simulated lichen biofilm system that can be used to remove pollutants and recycle nutrients from storm water runoff and polluted lakes, ponds, and lagoons. This appropriation is subject to Minnesota Statutes, section 116P.10. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_04b.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Bo,Hu,"U of MN","1390 Eckles Ave","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 625-4215",bhu@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/biofilm-technology-water-nutrient-removal-0,,,,
10004470,"Biological Consequences of Septic Pollution in Minnesota Lakes",2016,364000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 04c","$364,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Trustees of the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system for St. Cloud State University to assess the presence of possible sources of contaminants of emerging concern in Minnesota lakes in order to determine their effects on fish health, understand the potential contribution from septic systems, and inform options for remediation and prevention to protect Minnesota lakes from these contaminants in the future. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"St. Cloud State University","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_04c.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Heiko,Schoenfuss,"St. Cloud State University","720 Fourth Ave S WSB-273","St. Cloud",MN,56301,"(320) 308-3130",hschoenfuss@stcloudstate.edu,,"Minnesota State Colleges and Universities",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/biological-consequences-septic-pollution-minnesota-lakes-0,,,,
10004487,"Biological Control of Canada Thistle",2016,300000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06c","$300,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to develop a biological control for Canada thistle, an invasive plant species in Minnesota. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06c.pdf,2015-07-01,2019-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Roger,Becker,"U of MN","1991 Upper Buford Cir, 411 Borlaug Hall","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 625-5753",becke003@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/biological-control-canada-thistle-0,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2025,25000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(h)","$25,000 the first year and $25,000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. ","In FY25 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. The DNR will review the buffer map web applications for platform modernization and alignment, assess workflow process improvements, in preparation for a future customer service buffer map improvement project. ",,,,,,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2024,25000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(h)","$25,000 the first year and $25,000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. "," In FY24 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. The DNR will review the buffer map web applications for platform modernization and alignment, assess workflow process improvements, in preparation for a customer service buffer map improvement project. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY24 with passage of the public water inventory legislation). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,14111,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2023,25000,,"$25000 the first year and $25000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. ","In FY23 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. The DNR will review the buffer map web applications for platform modernization and alignment, assess workflow process improvements, in preparation for a customer service buffer map improvement project. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY23). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2022,25000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(h)","$25000 the first year and $25000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. ","In FY22 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY22). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,12264,2965,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2021,100000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website.","In FY21 the DNR will publish another updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners' behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map updates were identified in FY21). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners' behalf. ",,,,2731,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2020,100000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website.","In FY20 the DNR will publish another updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review."," Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY20). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,50710,,,0.4,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2019,100000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on buffer map interpretation to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","In FY19 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). Finally the DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review and buffer implementation for farmed-through locations.","The DNR published an updated buffer map in August 2018. Local government change requests and the DNR’s review of special situations resulted in 160 map changes. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations.",,,,59971,11044,,0.5,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2018,100000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on buffer map interpretation to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","The DNR will publish an updated buffer map in August 2017. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will make requested changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). Finally the DNR will work with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decisions on the buffer map comment review and buffer implementation for “farmed through” locations.","The DNR published an updated buffer map in August 2017. Local government change requests and the DNR’s review of special situations resulted in 212 corrections to the map. The DNR worked with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to develop and implement a consistent systematic framework for review of buffer map comments and buffer implementation for farmed-through public waters watercourses. The map was updated for Marshall County in June 2018 to correct public ditch location errors. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf.",,,,74821,11283,,0.5,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2017,325000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","(i) $325000 the first year and $325000 the second year are for analysis and mapping in each county related to compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements and to provide statewide coordination and guidance to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","In FY17 the DNR will publish updated versions of the buffer map in November and February. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will make requested changes that are consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). Finally DNR field staff will conduct detailed reviews of special situations where public watercourses were previously relocated placed in drain tile or farmed through. Several hundred of these situations were identified by landowners and local government staff in FY16 and the DNR anticipates many more being identified as local reviews of the map continue. The DNR’s review of these special situations may result in removing the state buffer requirement from the map in some of these areas.","The DNR published updated versions of the buffer map in November 2016 February 2017 and May 2017. The map was updated in May to reflect a significant change in the underlying public waters data. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically-specific comments on behalf of landowners. The buffer map review application was updated to provide the decision and rationale for every change request received whether accepted for a map change or not. DNR field staff conducted over 600 detailed reviews of special situations where public watercourses were previously relocated placed in drain tile or farmed through. The local government staff change requests and the DNR’s review of special situations resulted in 1 380 corrections to the map. ",,,,287518,34357,,1.2,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2016,325000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","(i) $325000 the first year and $325000 the second year are for analysis and mapping in each county related to compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements and to provide statewide coordination and guidance to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","In FY16 the DNR will make significant progress in developing buffer protection maps that describe where buffers are legally required on water bodies in Minnesota. We will set criteria for which waters will be included on the buffer protection map according to the requirements in the 2015 buffer law (M.L. 2015 SP1 Ch.4 Art. 4) and 2016 amendments (M.L. 2016 Ch. 85). The map will be developed in partnership with counties cities watershed districts soil and water conservation districts and other drainage authorities. We will create a map viewer that shows existing public waters inventory and DNR-assigned shoreland classifications on the map and make an initial map available online. See http://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/gis/buffersviewer/. The DNR will coordinate with drainage authorities to incorporate local information about public drainage ditches into the buffer protection map. We will make the draft buffer protection map available for review and comments through local governments which will work with us to ensure accuracy and designations on the final map. We will complete the map in summer 2016 and provide updates in fall 2016 and winter 2017. ","In FY16 the DNR developed buffer map criteria and created a preliminary map showing buffer requirements for all 87 counties. The map was based on DNR public waters inventory and shoreland classification data and public ditch data provided by over 90 drainage authorities. The DNR developed an interactive web-based map viewer (see http://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/gis/buffersviewer/) that allows local government staff to review the map and enter geographically specific comments. Local government staff reviewed the preliminary map and made 2603 comments resulting in 1450 map corrections. The total number of riparian buffers mapped is 145 113 including over 106 000 miles of public watercourses and public ditches and nearly 39 000 miles of lake and wetland shorelines. The map was published on July 12 2016. ",,,,284299,33759,,1.0,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
10004491,"Building Deconstruction to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Solid Waste",2016,845000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 07c1","$845,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources for an agreement with Better Futures Minnesota in cooperation with the Northwest Indian Opportunities Industrialization Center and $155,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota – Duluth for the Natural Resources Research Institute to develop and test a model for implementing building deconstruction and material reuse as a competitive alternative to demolition for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, reducing landfill waste, and providing job training. The project report must quantify and document greenhouse gas emissions reductions resulting from specific deconstruction techniques and materials reuses.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"The NetWork for Better Futures d/b/a Better Futures Minnesota","Non-Profit Business/Entity",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_07c.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Thomas,"ReUse Minnesota","3009 Como Ave SE",Minneapolis,MN,55414,"(612) 325-7856",steve@thenextfrontier.org,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/building-deconstruction-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-solid-waste-1,,,,
10004498,"Building Deconstruction to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Solid Waste",2016,155000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 07c2","$845,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources for an agreement with Better Futures Minnesota in cooperation with the Northwest Indian Opportunities Industrialization Center and $155,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota – Duluth for the Natural Resources Research Institute to develop and test a model for implementing building deconstruction and material reuse as a competitive alternative to demolition for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, reducing landfill waste, and providing job training. The project report must quantify and document greenhouse gas emissions reductions resulting from specific deconstruction techniques and materials reuses.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"The NetWork for Better Futures d/b/a Better Futures Minnesota","Non-Profit Business/Entity",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_07c-nrri.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Victor,Krause,"U of MN - Duluth NRRI","5013 Miller Trunk Hwy",Duluth,MN,55811,"(218) 788-2769",vkrause@d.umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/building-deconstruction-reduce-greenhouse-gas-emissions-and-solid-waste-2,,,,
34114,"Building Capacity of History Professionals",2016,75000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","Vendor selection; annual conference.",,,,,75000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MN Alliance of Local History Museums (MALHM) collaborates with MNHS to develop the capacity of history professionals across the state to serve local communities. This partnership will distribute best practices to all corners of the state through a conference to be held in April 2016 in Willmar. The partnership also will begin to operate with a paid coordinator to assure efficiency in serving a greater number of Minnesotans and their organizations that save and share history.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/building-capacity-history-professionals-0,,,,
33992,"Centennial History of the Carleton College Chapel and Chaplaincy",2016,10000,,,"Available upon request. Contact grants@mnhs.org","The outcome for this project: the Carleton College Archives, and scholars and the public will have new information and knowledge about the historic Carleton Skinner Chapel, the College Chaplaincy, and the place of religion over the College's 150 years. A completed edited manuscript will be available for scholars, and to the college for a centennial publication. These targets were achieved with the completion of the attached edited manuscript. The successful outcome was the result of rich original source material in the Carleton Archives, and an author familiar with Carleton's institutional history.",,,"Available upon request. Contact grants@mnhs.org",10000,,"Mark Applebaum, Carol Barnett, Dorothy Broom, William Craine, Jack Eugster, Maureen Gupta, John Harris, Michael Hasenstab, Elise Holschuh, James Johnson, Michele Joy, Martha Kaemmer, Leslie Kautz, Pamela Kiecker Royall, Arthur Kowaloff, Richard Kracum, Bonnie Melville, Bradford Nordholm, Gary O?Brien, Catherine Paglia, Steven Parrish, Steven Poskanzer, David Smith, William Sterling, Gary Sundem, Brooks Wallin, Wallace Weitz, Justin Wender, Bonnie Wheaton, Byron White, Michael Wiebolt, Mark Williams, Alison von Klemperer",0.00,"Carleton College","Private College/University","To hire qualified professionals to produce a manuscript on the history of Carleton College's Chapel and Chaplaincy.",,,2015-12-01,2016-12-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Thomas,Lamb,"Carleton College","1 North College Street",Northfield,MN,55057,,tlamb@carleton.edu,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,"Statewide, Rice",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/centennial-history-carleton-college-chapel-and-chaplaincy,,,,0
34125,"Civil War Soldier Database",2016,90000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (6) Historic Recognition Grants","$275,000 the first year and $275,000 the second year are for a competitive grants program to provide grants for projects carried out by nonprofit organizations or public entities that preserve, recognize, and promote the historic legacy of Minnesota, with a focus on commemoration of Minnesota's role in the American Civil War. The Minnesota Historical Society shall work collaboratively with the Governor's Civil War Commemorative Task Force to determine project priorities. Funds may be used for projects administered or delivered by the Minnesota Historical Society in cooperation with the task force.","Database, available to general public, reflecting individual data on all readily available Civil War veterans from Minnesota",,,,,90000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Historic Recognition Grant program will preserve, recognize, and promote the historic legacy of Minnesota, with a focus on commemoration of Minnesota's role in the American Civil War via a grave registration database to identify all known Minnesota Civil War soldiers buried in Minnesota and those Minnesotans buried outside the state is the first of three projects being administered by MNHS in cooperation with the state's Civil War Commemoration Task Force are in development",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/civil-war-soldier-database,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2022,205436,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3 (amended in M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3)","M.L. 2017 (e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ",,,,,,200398,5038,,,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2021,259586,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3 (amended in M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3)","(e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023. ",,,,,,254278,5308,,,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2020,609694,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3 (amended in M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3)","(e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023. ",,,,,,589212,20482,,,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2019,622885,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017 (e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","The following measures are tracked for the Clean Water Research Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of research projects supported Amount of funding requested in research contracts Number of different organizations that acess Clean Water Fund dollars ",,,,,602230,20655,,1.2,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2018,894991,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M. L. 2017: (e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ",,"Supported 35 research projects (5 active projects, 30 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 10 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. Below are examples of funding secured based on initial results and technology supported by Clean Water research projects: FY Project $ 10-11 EPA 319 45,600   MnDRIVE (Discovery Research and InnoVation Economy) 43,000   Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program 1,600 12-13 USDA NIFA-AFRI (National Institute of Food and Ag– Ag & Food Research Initiative) 475,000   National Science Foundation  4,300,000   USGS- Water Resource Center 28,760 14-15 MN Soybean 65,000   USDA NIFA-CAP (Coordinated Ag Products) 5,700,000   USDA CIG (Conservation Innovation Grant) 400,000 Research results used in WRAPS and One Watershed One Plan documents. Examples: Dr. Sadowsky’s work is often referenced in TMDLs related to E. coli Results from the Root River Sediment Budget have been used to inform implementation plans developed through the WRAPS and 1W1P process in Southeastern Minnesota watersheds. Efficiency values quantified through funded research have been incorporated into state supported assessment tools (PTMApp). ",,,,876138,18853,,1.2,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2017,993255,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (e) $788,000 the first year and $787,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ",,,,,,972674,20581,,1.25,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2016,1135603,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (e) $788,000 the first year and $787,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ",,,,,,1116436,19167,,1.25,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2015,959552,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2013: (e) $1,000,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018.  ","Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and impact of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed Clean Water Performance Reports in 2012 and 2014. At the heart of these reports is a suite of quantifiable performance measures.MDA's Clean Water Research Program is reporting on performance measure OPM12: Percent of research projects meeting research efficiency goals.This performance measure was developed using guidelines from the National Academies of Sciences 2008 report Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Each individual research project has specific deliverables.According to the National Academies' framework projects are evaluated according to two main criteria:1) Investment efficiency: is the agency making investments in the right projects? Investment efficiency is best evaluated by an independent, expert review panel that uses predominantly qualitative metrics to evaluate the program. The charge of the review panel is to determine if the research supported is relevant, of the highest quality, effective and efficient.Relevance is a measure of how well research supports the mission or purpose of the Clean Water Fund, which is to protect, enhance and restore lakes, rivers, streams, groundwater and drinking water in Minnesota.Quality refers to how research contributes to our understanding and knowledge of water resources in Minnesota. The review panel will evaluate the soundness, accuracy, novelty and reproducibility of the research projects.Effectiveness refers to the usability of research results by various stakeholders such as TMDL and other technical field staff, conservation professionals, and policy-makers.Efficiency refers to the ability to achieve quality, relevance, and effectiveness while minimizing resources devoted to the project in terms of time and money The review panel can also identify emerging issues and determine their place in research priorities. 2) Process efficiency: are the research investments being managed well?Process efficiency uses quantitative measures to track dollars and hours devoted to a project. Process efficiency refers to inputs, outputs, and intermediate outcomes of a research project and overall program.Inputs include agency resources such as funding, facilities, and staff that support research.Outputs are products delivered by a research project such as conclusions, reports, published papers, monitoring data and new techniques developed.Intermediate outcomes provide the review panel tangible metrics of evaluation. Examples of intermediate outcomes may include an improved body of knowledge available for decision-making, and newly developed tools and models. Tracking Outreach and EducationNumber of outreach activities (presentations, workshops, field days, and other events)Number of educational events (presentations or outreach to K-12 students or teachers, undergraduate science classes, non-science majors, grad students, etc)Number of peer-reviewed publications ",,,,,949783,9769,,"1 ","Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2014,691070,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2013: (e) $1,000,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to fiscal year 2015 ",,,,,681867,9203,,"1 ","Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2013,1050000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (e) $1,050,000 the first year and $1,050,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016.","Please refer to fiscal year 2015 ",,,,,,3500,,"1 ","Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2012,1050000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (e) $1,050,000 the first year and $1,050,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016.","Please refer to fiscal year 2015 ",,,,,,350,,0.1,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
34079,"College Internship Program",2016,123384,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","1. Improve the existing diversity percentage of the Internship Program student interns by 5% to 45% in FY16. The Diversity rate for FY15 was 40%. This was a decrease from FY14, however, our rate increased because of the We Are Hmong exhibit, placing a large group of interns to assist us with this project. This percent does not include the returning interns. In FY16 we have a 34% diversity rate however, we expect this to grow over the summer semester. We hope to reach a 40% diversity rate. These figures do not include returning students. Of those interns who returned to do multiple internships, the diversity rate of returning students was 57%. This tells us that interns from diverse communities are doing multiple internships that increase their skill level and make them more marketable in the workplace. 2. Have over 90% of interns state that the internship met their expectations, in a post survey conducted at the end of their internship. We have changed our survey tool in the past year. Instead of measuring intern expectations, we are using a Net Promoter Score. This adapts to our new evaluation system. We have an average Net Promoter Score of +54 for FY16; which we are very happy with. For FY16, 97.5% of interns surveyed said their internship increased their knowledge of current issues in the public history field. 95% said their internship increased their interest in working in a cultural institution. 86% said they would apply for a job at MNHS. The number of interns who rated their job skills as above average or higher increased from 35.5% at the beginning of their internship to 86.5% at the end of their internship. 93% of interns said their experience increased their interest in history. We are seeing a number of our intrns being hired. We are working with HR to try to measure this. 3. Interns will contribute approximately 9,000 hours across at least 20 departments. College interns worked in 19 departments/programs in FY15 totaling 18,400 hours. So far in FY16, college interns have worked over 8,000 hours in 15 departments. We're on pace to have 18,500 hours for FY16.",,,10000,"Private Donor",123384,17081,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",1.70,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","College student interns representing Minnesota's diverse communities are placed across MNHS in various departments and sites. During their semester-long internships, students have the opportunity to work alongside museum and public history professionals to enhance their skills and apply their knowledge in a professional environment. The activities focus on engaging with MNHS on a deeper level by discussing current issues and trends with staff, sharing intern experiences, and building professional networks. In FY15, Legacy funds supported 114 college interns, who contributed over 18,400 hours at the History Center and historic sites. Forty percent of participants were from diverse communities. A larger number of diverse students had multiple internships with us, providing them with more experience and exposure to the work environment and enabling them to gain more work experience as they apply for professional jobs.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/college-internship-program-0,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2024,503726,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2023,403780,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","In FY23, Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office, regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that will advance the Legacy mission to Connect People to the Outdoors:  1. Education and Interpretive Services;  2. Outreach public affairs and web; and  3. Information Technology.  (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes). ",,,,,,,,20.5,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2022,345140,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","In FY22 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that will advance the Legacy mission to Connect People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes). ","In FY22, Parks and Trails provided Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advanced the Legacy mission to Connect People to the Outdoors:  1. Education and Interpretive Services;  2. Outreach public affairs and web; and  3. Information Technology.  (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments). ",,,,,,,16.2,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2021,142406,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","In FY21 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that will advance the Legacy mission to Connect People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).",,,,,,,,21.5,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2020,335347,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","In FY 20 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Connecting People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).","In FY20 Parks and Trails provided Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advanced the Legacy mission to Connect People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).",,,,,,,23.9,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2019,452466,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 19 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Connecting People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).","In FY 19 this program provided support to central office regional and field operations of three (3) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Connecting People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).",,,,,,,23.9,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2018,433189,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 18 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Connecting People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).","In FY 18 this program provided support to central office regional and field operations of three (3) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Connecting People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).",,,,,,,24.4,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2017,311005,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 17 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three (3) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Connecting People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. ","In FY 17 this program provided support to central office regional and field operations of three (3) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Connecting People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).",,,,,,,24.0,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2016,493555,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 16 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of three (3) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Connecting People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. ","In FY 16 this program provided support to central office regional and field operations of three (3) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of Connecting People to the Outdoors: 1. Education and Interpretive Services; 2. Outreach public affairs and web; and 3. Information Technology. (see those programs for a summary of accomplishments).",,,,217000,276555,,24.6,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2015,266707,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,20.15,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2014,274500,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,25.0,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2013,182750,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,1967250,182750,,30.0,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18196,"Connecting People to the Outdoors -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2012,182750,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(b)","$2100000 the first year is for acquisition of land adjacent to LaSalle Lake in Hubbard County for a state recreation area.",,,,,,1967250,182750,,30.0,,,"Connecting People to the Outdoors - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to better develop Minnesota's stewards of tomorrow through efforts to increase life-long participation in parks and trails. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the three other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Connecting People to the Outdoors that do not fall directly in one of the three related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-people-outdoors-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
10004484,"Connecting Students with Watersheds through Hands-On Learning",2016,400000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 05b","$400,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources for an agreement with Minnesota Trout Unlimited to provide hands-on learning focused on water quality, groundwater, aquatic life, and watershed health stewardship. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Trout Unlimited","Non-Profit Business/Entity",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_05b.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,John,Lenczewski,"Minnesota Trout Unlimited","PO Box 845",Chanhassen,MN,55317,"(612) 670-1629",jlenczewski@comcast.net,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/connecting-students-watersheds-through-hands-learning-0,,,,
10004447,"Conservation Easement Assessment and Valuation System Development",2016,250000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 09k","$250,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to assess the effectiveness of existing conservation easements acquired through state expenditures at achieving their intended outcomes of public value and ecological benefits and to develop a standardized, objective conservation easement valuation system for guiding future state investments in conservation easements to ensure the proposed environmental benefits are being achieved in a cost-effective manner. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_09k.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Bonnie,Keeler,"U of MN","1954 Buford Ave","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(651) 353-9294",keeler@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/conservation-easement-assessment-and-valuation-system-development-0,,,,
10004482,"Contract Agreement Reimbursement",2016,135000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 11b","$135,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources at the direction of the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources for expenses incurred for contract agreement reimbursement for the agreements specified in this section. The commissioner shall provide documentation to the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources on the expenditure of these funds.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"MN DNR","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_11b.pdf,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund",Completed,,,Katherine,Sherman-Hoehn,"MN DNR","500 Lafayette Rd, Box 10","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5533",Katherine.Sherman-Hoehn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/contract-agreement-reimbursement-4,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2024,622000,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. Sec. 3(a)(4)","$722,000 the first year and $645,000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department, the Metropolitan Council, and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2023,412000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$512000 the first year and $512000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee. ","In FY23, staff will support the Coordinate with Partners pillar and manage its related programs:  1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program;  2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website;  3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes). ",,,,,,,,2.3,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2022,412000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$512000 the first year and $512000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee. ","In FY22 staff will support the Coordinate with Partners pillar and manage its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes). ","In FY22, staff successfully supported the Coordinate with Partners pillar and managed its related programs:  1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program;  2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website;  3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations.  (see individual programs for accomplishments). ",,,,,,,2.1,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2021,412000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$500000 the first year and $512000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.","In FY21 staff will support the Coordinate with Partners pillar and manage its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).",,,,,,,,1.7,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2020,400000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$500000 the first year and $512000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.","Leadership and staff support for the 'Coordinating with Partners' pillar and its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes). ","In FY20 staff successfully supported the Coordinate with Partners pillar and managed its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations. (see individual programs for accomplishments).",,,,,,,2.3,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2019,398000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$521000 the first year and $548000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced Web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.","Leadership and staff support for the 'Coordinating with Partners' pillar and its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes). In addition measurable goals in this area include presenting Parks and Trails Legacy accomplishments and engaging the public around future strategic directions at the 2018 Minnesota State Fair and planning to continue to that effort at the 2019 State Fair.","In FY19 staff successfully supported the 'Coordinating with Partners' pillar and managed its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations. (see individual programs for accomplishments). In addition accomplishments in this area included preparations for highlighting Parks and Trails Legacy accomplishments and directions at the Minnesota State Fair in 2019 (at the DNR building). ",,,,,,,2.5,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2018,371000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$521000 the first year and $548000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced Web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.","Leadership and staff support for the 'Coordinating with Partners' pillar and its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).","In FY18 staff successfully supported the 'Coordinating with Partners' pillar and managed its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations. (see individual programs for accomplishments). In addition accomplishments in this area included preparations for highlighting Parks and Trails Legacy accomplishments and directions at the Minnesota State Fair in 2018 (at the DNR building). ",,,,,,,2.5,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2017,355000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$536000 the first year and $555000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced Web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee. Of this amount $260000 the first year shall be used for a grant to the University of Minnesota Center for Changing Landscapes to complete a legacy tracking project and to implement a survey on use patterns user needs and perceptions related to parks and trails in Minnesota. The tracking project and survey work must be done in collaboration with the Department of Natural Resources Metropolitan Council and Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission.","Staff support for the 'Coordinating with Partners' pillar and the successful management of its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations.","In FY17 staff successfully supported the 'Coordinating with Partners' pillar and managed its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations. (see individual programs for accomplishments).",,,,,,,2.2,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2016,310000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$536000 the first year and $555000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced Web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee. Of this amount $260000 the first year shall be used for a grant to the University of Minnesota Center for Changing Landscapes to complete a legacy tracking project and to implement a survey on use patterns user needs and perceptions related to parks and trails in Minnesota. The tracking project and survey work must be done in collaboration with the Department of Natural Resources Metropolitan Council and Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission.","Staff support for the 'Coordinating with Partners' pillar and the successful management of its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations.","Staff successfully supported the 'Coordinating with Partners' pillar and the successful management of its related programs: 1. Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program; 2. Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website; 3. Landscape reconstruction evaluations.",,,,50000,,,2.6,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2013,17000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(4)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,185000,17000,,1.0,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18201,"Coordinating with Partners - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective ",2012,17000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(4)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,185000,17000,,1.0,,,"Coordinating with Partner's - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan identifies its purpose to enhance coordination across the large and complex network of public, private, and non-profit partners that support Minnesota's parks and trails to ensure seamless, enjoyable park and trail experiences for Minnesotans. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the one other program that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of taking care of what we have that do not fall directly in the other related program. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Lars,Erdahl,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5643",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/coordinating-partners-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
34116,"Cornerstone Academy Partnership",2016,117800,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","Classes and attendees are counted (see legacy report numbers for most recent information) and all courses are evaluated as part of the program (evaluation tool will be reworked this agreement period).",,,,,117800,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Cornerstone Academy, the preservation education partnership of the Preservation Alliance and MNHS, launched in 2014. The statewide preservation education program has developed a training series for homeowners, community members, and professionals in fields that frequently interact with historic buildings and districts. Last year, hundreds of property owners across the state participated in more than 40 workshops. Courses included Understanding Historic Tax Credits, Handyman Special, Repairing Old Windows, and Why Old is Green: Sustainability in Older Homes. MNHS sites are sometimes used as workshop classrooms through this partnership, further demonstrating the value of historic spaces. In the coming year, Cornerstone Academy will continue to inform, motivate, and connect even more people to places with classes throughout Minnesota.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/cornerstone-academy-partnership,,,,
10004464,"County Geologic Atlases - Part A",2016,2040000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03a","$2,040,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Minnesota Geological Survey to continue acceleration of the production of county geologic atlases for the purpose of sustainable management of surface water and groundwater resources. This appropriation is to complete Part A of county geologic atlases, which focuses on the properties and distribution of earth materials in order to define aquifer boundaries and the connection of aquifers to the land surface and surface water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN - MN Geological Survey","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03a.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Dale,Setterholm,"U of MN - MN Geological Survey","2609 Territorial Rd","St. Paul",MN,55114,"(612) 626-5119",sette001@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-1,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2014,2574731,,,,,,,,,,,25,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2015,2909980,,,,,,,,,,,29,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2016,2753907,,,,,,,,,,,27,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2017,2429331,,,,,,,,,,,24,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2018,2696395,,,,,,,,,,,26,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2019,2599600,,,,,,,,,,,25,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2020,2973000,,,,,,,,,,,29,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2021,3045774,,,,,,,,,,,30,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2022,3009907,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(f)",,,,,,,,,,30,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2023,2650000,,,,,,,,,,,26.5,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2024,2027047,,,,,,,,,,,20,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2025,100000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(i)","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for accelerating completion of or updates to county geologic atlases and supplementing water chemistry or chemical movement studies. ","The DNR will continue to support specialized drilling at the Minnesota Geological Survey and water resource investigations as needed to enhance geologic atlases. The DNR is continuing dye tracing and nitrate monitoring, as well as adding enhancements to the Minnesota Groundwater Tracing Database (MGTD) through the contract with the University of Minnesota. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2024,100000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(i)","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for accelerating completion of or updates to county geologic atlases and supplementing water chemistry or chemical movement studies. ","The DNR will support specialized drilling, water chemistry and dye trace studies as needed to enhance geologic atlases and other water quality investigations. ","These funds were used to improve atlas products and our understanding of water quality in southeast Minnesota. Funding also supported the Minnesota Geological Survey upgrade of their geophysics software which will greatly improve the maps that they generate. ",,,,52113,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2023,,,,,,,,,31201,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2022,,,,,"After the adjusted budget forecast a portion of the Clean Water funds from FY21 rolled forward from in FY22, the DNR Atlas staff continued the unique groundwater dye-tracing studies in the cities of Pequot Lakes and Riverton in support of the MN Department of Health's Pathogen Project to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at several southeastern Minnesota locations in collaboration with local partners and MPCA to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and continued monitoring for flow, temperature, and nitrate concentrations at additional springs. The information is also used in developing the County Groundwater Atlas. DNR completed ten new traces including: Two traces with MDH at a Pathogen Project site in northeastern Minnesota Two traces west of Harmony in Fillmore County that greatly expanded our understanding of the Odessa springshed One trace west of Harmony in Fillmore County that importantly expanded the Engle springshed to the borders of the Big Spring Quarry One trace near Mystery Cave that assisted in delineating the springsheds of Saxifrage and Crayfish springs One trace northeast of Mystery Cave that greatly assisted in delineating the Meyer’s Spring springshed and our understanding or groundwater-surface water interactions there. Three traces at Bear Spring in conjunction with Olmsted County and U of M partners that have assisted in characterizing aquifer properties of the Galena Group ",,,,87030,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2021,150000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$150000 the first year and $150000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","The May 2020 budget forecast required agencies to reduce Clean Water Fund spending by $17.6 million dollars. Funding for the atlas program in FY21 was cut but the ENRTF portion of the funding continued. ","In FY21 the DNR published the Groundwater Atlas of Winona County and continued or completed data collection and analysis for: Becker Cass Dodge Hennepin Houston Hubbard Isanti Kandiyohi Nobles Olmsted Rock and Wadena counties. DNR supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information for atlases in Cook and Polk counties. As a result of reduced funding from DNR and the Clean Water Fund the amount of drilling scheduled for FY21 was reduced slowing overall progress for those counties. The drilling schedule was also negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and reduced field activities. Leveraging Clean Water funding that rolled forward from FY20 the DNR Atlas staff continued groundwater dye-tracing studies in the cities of Pequot Lakes and Riverton and expanded dye-tracing activities at YMCA Camp du Nord in support of the MN Department of Health's Pathogen Project to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at several southeastern Minnesota locations in collaboration with local partners and MPCA to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and continued monitoring at several stations for flow temperature and nitrate at additional springs. ",,,,49638,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2020,150000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$150000 the first year and $150000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","In FY20 the DNR Atlas Program will use Clean Water Fund to supplement geological and water chemistry information in Dodge Olmsted Kandiyohi Rock and Nobles counties. The DNR will publish atlases for Houston Winona Morrison Redwood Brown and Kanabec counties that were partially supported with Clean Water Funds. The DNR will conduct groundwater dye tracing studies at two locations and begin work at two additional locations in support of Minnesota Department of Health studies to identify the sources of pathogens and other contaminants in water supply wells. The DNR will also conduct dye tracing at up to four locations in southeastern Minnesota to better understand the groundwater flow related to trout streams and other surface waters and continue to five monitor sentinel springs. ","In FY20 the DNR published Groundwater Atlases for Morrison Redwood Brown and Kanabec counties and continued or completed data collection and analysis for: Winona Houston Hubbard Hennepin Dodge Olmsted Becker Cass Isanti Wadena Rock and Nobles counties. Covid-19 slowed progress on several counties and shifted work activities. DNR supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information for atlases in Lincoln Pipestone Chippewa and Yellow Medicine. Leveraging Clean Water funding the DNR Atlas staff completed groundwater dye tracing studies at McCarthy Beach State Park and YMCA Camp du Nord in support of a Minnesota Department of Health effort to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. DNR Atlas staff also began work on dye trace studies in support of the pathogen project in cities of Pequot Lakes and Riverton. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at several southeastern Minnesota locations to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and continued monitoring at several stations for flow temperature and nitrate at additional springs. ",,,,113913,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2019,125000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$125000 the first year and $125000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","In FY19 DNR will use Clean Water Fund to supplement geological and water chemistry information in Aitkin Olmsted and Steele counties. The DNR will publish atlases for Houston Meeker Morrison and Washington counties that were partially supported with Clean Water Funds. DNR will conduct groundwater dye tracing studies at two locations in support of Minnesota Department of Health studies to identify the sources of contaminants in water supply wells. DNR will also conduct dye tracing at two locations in southeastern Minnesota to better understand the groundwater flow related to trout streams and other surface waters. ","In FY19 the DNR published Groundwater Atlases for Washington and Meeker counties and continued or completed data collection and analysis for eight others: Hubbard Hennepin Dodge Olmsted Becker Cass Morrison and Wadena. We supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information in Aitkin Steele St. Louis Lake Dakota Pennington Otter Tail and Lac Qui Parle. Leveraging Clean Water funding the DNR Atlas staff continued a groundwater dye tracing study at McCarthy Beach State Park and began a study at YMCA Camp du Nord near Ely in support of a Minnesota Department of Health effort to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at four southeastern Minnesota locations to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and established continuous monitoring stations for flow temperature and nitrate at three additional springs.",,,,114205,10109,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2018,125000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$125000 the first year and $125000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","In FY18 the DNR will publish atlases for Houston Meeker Morrison Sherburne and Wright counties and complete data analysis and draft text and figures for six others: Brown Kanabec Redwood Wadena Washington and Winona. We will support completion of special high-quality drilling and coring by the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) in Kandiyohi Rock and Nobles counties to obtain detailed geologic mapping data for Part A of new atlases. ","In FY18 the DNR published Part B atlases for Clay Sherburne and Wright counties and completed data collection and analysis for eight others: Becker Cass Houston Isanti Meeker Morrison Wadena and Washington. We supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information in Dodge Kandiyohi Nobles and Rock counties. DNR staff completed a groundwater dye tracing study at McCarthy Beach State Park in support of a Minnesota Department of Health effort to identify the source of contaminants in nearby water supply wells. DNR also completed dye tracing at three southeastern Minnesota locations to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters.",,,,120045,12700,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2017,250000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","(h) $250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","In FY17 the DNR will publish atlases for Anoka Nicollet Sibley Renville and Clay counties and complete data analysis and draft text and figures for six others: Houston Meeker Morrison Sherburne Winona and Wright. We will continue building on Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) work in Part A of each atlas by acquiring detailed subsurface geologic data to better interpret existing well logs. We will also continue supporting MGS efforts to provide access to legacy atlas data and related MGS databases which helps us develop Part B of each atlas.","In FY17 DNR published Part B atlases for Anoka Nicollet Sibley and Renville counties and completed data analysis and draft text and figures for six others: Clay Houston Meeker Morrison Sherburne and Wright. We supported the completion of special high-quality drilling and coring by the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) in Cass Hubbard and Isanti counties to obtain detailed geologic mapping data for Part A of new atlases. We also continued to support the acquisition of legacy atlas data and related MGS databases.",,,,426559,33338,,3.3,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2016,250000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","(h) $250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","The DNR will complete atlases for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties. Here is a summary of our goals for each county active in the atlas program in FY2016: Clay: finish collecting expanded samples. Renville: finish collecting expanded samples and continue analyzing data and writing the report. Houston: finish collecting expanded field data; start analyzing data. Winona and Morrison: start collecting expanded field data; start analyzing data. Anoka Sherburne and Wright: continue analyzing data and writing reports. We will continue to use Clean Water Funds to build on the work by MGS in Part A of each atlas with scientific boreholes as described in the FY15 outcomes. We will also use Clean Water Funds to support MGS’s work to provide access to legacy atlas data and related MGS databases which help us develop Part B of each atlas. ","In FY16 the DNR completed the Blue Earth County atlas began the final internal and external review of the Nicollet and Sibley County atlases and made substantial progress on atlases for eight other counties. Specifically we completed data collection and continued analyzing data and writing reports for Anoka Sherburne Renville and Wright; we finished collecting expanded samples for Clay and Houston and started analyzing data for the latter; and we started collecting and analyzing expanded field data for Winona and Morrison. Also in FY16 we continued building on Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) work in Part A of each atlas and supported MGS efforts to provide access to legacy atlas data and related MGS databases. This helps us develop Part B of each atlas.",,,,515953,26915,,4.1,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2015,615000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$615000 the first year and $615000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","In FY15 the DNR will complete atlases for Chisago Blue Earth and Anoka counties. We will also finish expanded field data collection for Sherburne Wright and Renville counties. Data analysis and report preparation will continue for Nicollet and Sibley counties. Data analysis will be initiated for Sherburne Wright and Renville counties. We may start data collection in Clay county. Funds will also be used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases. Funds will be used to complete data acquisition at the research borehole installed at Afton State Park and properly seal the borehole.","In FY15 DNR County Geologic Atlas staff completed the Chisago County Geologic Atlas Part B. We continued to work on the atlases Blue Earth Nicollet Sibley Renville Clay Anoka Wright and Sherburne counties. The following is a status report for FY2015 for each active county atlas: Blue Earth Nicollet Sibley Anoka: in data analysis and report preparation stage. Renville: collecting and analyzing data. Clay: started collecting data. Wright: data collection complete; in data analysis and report preparation stage. Sherburne: entered data analysis stage We used Clean Water Funds to expand the number of groundwater samples collected for each atlas project. We expanded work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes which allowed us to get detailed subsurface geologic data. This data helps us better interpret existing well logs from Part A atlases. We also used funds to finish collecting data at the research borehole installed at Afton State Park and then to properly seal the borehole. Compared to planned outcomes for FY15 we finished most of the work we planned to do except the completion of atlases for Blue Earth and Anoka counties. The Blue Earth atlas Part B is in final draft; we continue to work on the Anoka report. We also made significant progress on the Nicollet and Sibley atlases. We did not finish collecting data for Renville County because of the laboratory data was not delivered on time but it is scheduled for the first quarter of FY16. ",,,,602706,73033,,3.4,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2014,615000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$615000 the first year and $615000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","In FY14 DNR will complete atlases for Carver and Chisago counties. DNR will also finish expanded field data collection for Anoka County. Data analysis and report preparation will continue for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties and continue or initiate data analysis for the Anoka County atlas. DNR will start data collection in Renville Wright and Sherburne counties. Vacancies will be filled and progress made on the hiring of positions for the expanded staffing level. Funds will also be used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases.","In FY14 DNR completed the County Geologic Atlas (Part B) for Carver County with the Chisago County Geologic Atlas (Part B) in final editing (publication expected September). Report preparation is underway for the Anoka County Geologic Atlas (Part B) with a draft completed. A Science Report Lead and an Editor were hired in the second half of FY14. The editor position had been vacant for about a year which delayed report preparation. The science report lead is a new position as team lead for the geographic information system (GIS)/cartography-maps/editing staff working together on atlas reports. Data analysis continued for Nicollet and Sibley counties but at a low level due to a staff vacancy. Final report preparation continued for the Blue Earth atlas. Field data collection was completed and data analysis started for Anoka county. New field data collection was initiated for Sherburne and Wright counties. Funds were used to expand the number of groundwater samples collected for each atlas project. Funds were used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases. Funds were also used to conduct scientific data acquisition at a research borehole installed at Afton State Park. ",,,,404825,50987,,3.9,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2013,,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","In FY13 DNR will complete atlases for Carver McLeod and Chisago counties. DNR will also finish expanded field data collection for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties and continue or initiate data analysis for those three atlases. Funds will also be used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases.","In FY13 DNR completed County Geologic Atlases (Part B) for McLeod county. Data analysis and report preparation was initiated or continued for Carver Chisago Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties. Field data collection was completed for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley. No new field data collection was initiated for additional counties. Work was delayed because of understaffing due to vacancies; three atlas staff took promotions to other units or agencies. The MGS drilled several scientific boreholes for detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases.",,,,106184,,,0.5,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2012,,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","In FY 12 DNR will complete four atlases (Benton Carver McLeod Chisago) and begin data collection and analysis on three additional counties (Blue Earth Nicollet Sibley). "," In FY12 DNR completed the Benton County Geologic Atlas (Part B); data analysis and report preparation continued for Carver McLeod and Chisago Counties. Field data collection was initiated for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley Counties.",,,,23350,,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2011,,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","In FY10 and 11 DNR will complete two atlases for each fiscal year.","In FY11 DNR completed the Carlton County Geologic Atlas (Part B). DNR also collected field data for Atlases in Benton Carver McLeod and Chisago Counties and continued data analysis and began report production for the Atlases in Benton and Chisago Counties.",,,,243388,32400,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2010,1000000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","DNR will complete two atlases for each fiscal year.","In FY 10 DNR completed the Todd County Geologic Atlas Part B. Clean Water funding is used to improve the quality of County Geologic Atlases by collecting additional subsurface geologic samples expanding the number of sites sampled for water chemistry starting the process of installing a research well to collect stratified groundwater data from multiple aquifers and purchasing and repairing equipment.",,,,26705,30000,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
10004495,"Creating a Statewide Wetland Bird Survey",2016,146000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03f","$146,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources for an agreement with Audubon Minnesota to develop a statewide wetland bird monitoring program to enable long-term monitoring of the status of wetland birds and the health of their wetland habitats. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"Audubon Minnesota","Non-Profit Business/Entity",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03f.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Kristin,Hall,"Audubon Minnesota","1 Water St W, Ste 200","St. Paul",MN,55107,"(651) 739-9332",khall@audubon.org,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/creating-statewide-wetland-bird-survey-0,,,,
34081,"U.S. Dakota War of 1862 - Minnesota River Valley Scenic Byways Mobile Tour",2016,9637,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","We will measure the number of unique calls into the tour; number of unique visits to the website; and number of brochures distributed. Previous focus group with tour users indicated high satisfaction with tour; increased knowledge of MN history; and change in attitude abut MN River valley history.",,,,,9637,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","This mobile tour offers intriguing stories and reflections about historic sites along the Minnesota River Valley, the people who lived there and the lasting impact of the U.S. Dakota War of 1862. In FY16 the Upper Minnesota Valley Regional Development Commission will provide technical assistance and enhancements for the tour, including incorporating the tour and its oral histories into a new Byways Visitor Guide; updating its website to include access to the tour; conducting outreach with the Lower Sioux Community and Dakota Wicohan to develop Dakota language and perspective enhancements to the website and tour; and providing additional promotional support.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/us-dakota-war-1862-minnesota-river-valley-scenic-byways-mobile-tour-0,,,,
36602,"Developing Indices of Streamflow Alteration",2016,75000,,,,,,,,,,,.72,"US Geological Survey","Federal Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has identified streamflow alteration as a key stressor on aquatic life, but the characteristics of streamflow alteration acting as stressors have not been identified in the MPCA Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) process. Without indices that characterize streamflow alteration, the MPCA cannot quantitatively associate metrics of aquatic life condition to streamflow alteration. The lack of quantifiable indices limits the ability of the MPCA to assess environmental streamflow needs for streams and rivers throughout Minnesota. The project will develop relationships between streamflow and biological data metrics for use in evaluating streamflow alteration as a stressor on aquatic life in rivers and streams in Minnesota. ",,,2016-04-20,2018-01-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Mary Jo",Sager,"US Geological Survey","2280 Woodale Dr ","Mounds View",MN,55112,"(651) 783-3120",,Research,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/developing-indices-streamflow-alteration,,,,
36602,"Developing Indices of Streamflow Alteration",2017,75000,,,,,,,,,,,.72,"US Geological Survey","Federal Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has identified streamflow alteration as a key stressor on aquatic life, but the characteristics of streamflow alteration acting as stressors have not been identified in the MPCA Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) process. Without indices that characterize streamflow alteration, the MPCA cannot quantitatively associate metrics of aquatic life condition to streamflow alteration. The lack of quantifiable indices limits the ability of the MPCA to assess environmental streamflow needs for streams and rivers throughout Minnesota. The project will develop relationships between streamflow and biological data metrics for use in evaluating streamflow alteration as a stressor on aquatic life in rivers and streams in Minnesota. ",,,2016-04-20,2018-01-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Mary Jo",Sager,"US Geological Survey","2280 Woodale Dr ","Mounds View",MN,55112,"(651) 783-3120",,Research,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/developing-indices-streamflow-alteration,,,,
34070,"Development of Minnesota Curriculum",2016,141404,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","OKF - Number of participants, evaluations from teachers, revenue generated. Web - Number of web users and ""hits"" Curriculum - Sales of products, teacher focus groups in development, surveys of users",,,,,141404,18282,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",1.70,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS is developing new curricula, programs, and resources to engage students in learning about Minnesota history. In FY16 a full review of online resources for the K-12 audience will be completed and an action plan put in place to update content and the design of online curriculum offered to K-12 teachers and students. In addition, staff are working with the Oliver Kelley Farm to create new curricula and programs on agriculture, history, and STEM for K-12 teachers and students. Two new programs will be developed and piloted at the Oliver Kelley Farm in FY16. Staff are also researching a digital curriculum focused on the experiences of refugees who came to Minnesota in the 20th century. A prototype of the digital experience using Hmong refugee stories has been developed and will be tested with students in the winter of 2015-16. A funding proposal will be developed, based on the results of user testing, to complete development and production of the digital curriculum.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/development-minnesota-curriculum-0,,,,
33984,"Digitization of Oral History Project: WWII Years, 1941-1946",2016,4342,,,"Available upon request. Contact grants@mnhs.org","Our short terms metrics are on target with expectations. One of the goals of this project was to provide access to materials that were quickly becoming inaccessible due to format and media degradation. By digitizing the project we have met those expectations. Additionally we have provided digital access to the materials allowing patrons to access the collection without physically visiting Concordia Special Collections; any access of this collection meets our target. With the launch of the collection we tracked 16 views of the collection in August, 3 views in September, and 4 views in October. Intermediate to long-term: We have yet to do much promotion of the collection, but we plan to write a news piece for our blog which will be posted to various social media outlets. Metadata for the collection was recently harvested for DPLA with the hope that this will also increase traffic to the collection. Our library has been contacted by a group working on a 10-part documentary series, ""The Home Front,"" about the potential possibility of using some of these interviews--which is great publicity for the collection. This contact came after a query to a posting on H-Net looking for oral history projects on American civilians during WWII years; we can continue to monitor for other projects that could utilize our resources and reach out to them as they come up.",,,"Available upon request. Contact grants@mnhs.org",4342,,"Ken Behm, Jocelyn Benson, Colleen Braun, Carol M. Fehrmann, Sandra Frauenshuh, James Giertz, LaoLu Hang, Gregg Hein, Loren Leslie, Fungchatou Lo, Joan Miller, Mark Moksnes, Dean Nadasdy, Paul Steinhaus, Lori Utech",0.00,"Concordia University, St. Paul","Private College/University","To digitize a collection of oral history interviews in order to broaden public accessibility.",,,2015-12-01,2016-12-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Megan,Johnson-Saylor,"Concordia University, St. Paul","275 Syndicate","St. Paul",MN,55104,651-641-8244,johnsonsaylor@csp.edu,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/digitization-oral-history-project-wwii-years-1941-1946,,,,0
34088,"Digitization of Minnesota's Newspapers",2016,329196,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Number of pages digitized. Cost analysis completed for various digital preservation scenarios to arrive at best practices. Number of hits and searches conducted on the Minnesota Newspaper Hub.",,,,,329196,16123,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",1.50,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS continues its focus on preserving and making accessible the newspapers published in the state. Last year, the staff concentrated on acquiring digital content from publishers and building the access hub, Minnesota Newspapers Online (MNO). Work on both of these activities will continue. MNHS expects to launch an improved version of MNO in 2016 and increase the total number of pages available to search. Over the next year, staff will turn their attention to the backlog of papers that have not yet been digitized as well as establishing infrastructure to keep up with the digitization of all papers currently being acquired. To better meet user demand and preservation requirements, staff will examine the potential of generating microfilm backups to the digital files that can be purchased by local historical societies.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Preservation, Planning","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/digitization-minnesotas-newspapers-2,,,,
34091,"Digitization of Historical Collections",2016,203603,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Progress will be measured by the number of catalog records updated, items photographed and published online. Access will be measured by the number of visits to our content on the web.",,,,,203603,27749,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",2.50,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Increasing the public's online access to the MNHS permanent collections remains a top priority for the Collections Department. Since the beginning of FY16 (July 1, 2015), over 1,000 artifacts have been digitally photographed and cataloged. (About a third of the artifacts have been published to our online catalog.) This included American Indian material culture (338 items) as well as recent acquisitions and artifacts associated with the Minnesota State Fair (200 items) and popular music in Minnesota (345 items). The digitization of Ojibwe artifacts, World War I military artifacts, and the Hmong textile collection has now been completed. For the remainder of FY16, digitization will continue to focus on recently acquired artifacts, remaining American Indian artifacts, artifacts associated with upcoming History Center exhibitions, and artifacts relating to the topic of exploration and explorers.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Digitization/Online Information Access","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/digitization-historical-collections-1,,,,
34127,"Digital Civil War Tools for Teachers",2016,40000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (6) Historic Recognition Grants","$275,000 the first year and $275,000 the second year are for a competitive grants program to provide grants for projects carried out by nonprofit organizations or public entities that preserve, recognize, and promote the historic legacy of Minnesota, with a focus on commemoration of Minnesota's role in the American Civil War. The Minnesota Historical Society shall work collaboratively with the Governor's Civil War Commemorative Task Force to determine project priorities. Funds may be used for projects administered or delivered by the Minnesota Historical Society in cooperation with the task force.","Number of teachers utilizing these new tools into their classroom for the benefit of students",,,,,40000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Historic Recognition Grant program will preserve, recognize, and promote the historic legacy of Minnesota, with a focus on commemoration of Minnesota's role in the American Civil War via creation of a digital Civil War resource to aid student instruction for sixth and seventh grade teachers is the third of three projects being administered by MNHS in cooperation with the state's Civil War Commemoration Task Force are in development",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/digital-civil-war-tools-teachers,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2024,500000,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2023,500000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","This program seeks to provide funding for regions for high priority projects that are small in nature  but have high impact. An example may be rehabilitating a hiking trail that has eroded and is causing sedimentation to a nearby stream  or the replacement of a hiking bridge to resolve safety issues for hikers. Because the projects are highly variable in size and scope  success is measured by the number of projects completed combined with brief descriptions of the impact. ",,,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2022,500000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2021,500000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2020,500000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","This program seeks to provide funding for regions for high priority projects that are small in nature but have high impact. An example may be rehabilitating a hiking trail that has eroded and is causing sedimentation to a nearby stream or the replacement of a hiking bridge to resolve safety issues for hikers. Because the projects are highly variable in size and scope success is measured by the number of projects completed combined with brief descriptions of the impact.",,,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2019,500000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to provide funding for regions for high priority projects that are small in nature but have high impact. An example may be rehabilitating a hiking trail that has eroded and is causing sedimentation to a nearby stream or the replacement of a hiking bridge to resolve safety issues for hikers. Because the projects are highly variable in size and scope success is measured by the number of projects completed combined with brief descriptions of the impact.","Legacy dollars at the regional and local level were a critical flexible tool to help field staff solve significant smaller scale problems. Examples of field projects completed in FY19 include: Northwest Region: *Installed electric in two camper cabins at Glacial Lakes State Park. *Added two benches and three picnic tables to the nature play space at Buffalo River State Park. *Added 70 cubic yards of sand to the Hayes Lake beach restoring it to its historic extent. *Rebuild of the decaying Grefthen Bay deck at Hayes Lake State Park including ADA improvements. *Added a new volleyball net and sand to the volleyball court at Lake Carlos State Park. *Replaced the information kiosk at the Jacob V. Brower Visitor Center parking lot in Itasca State Park with a four-sided kiosk to provide additional space for visitor information. Northeast Region: *Purchased materials to repair and improve boardwalk and docks below the Chase Point Campground at Scenic State Park. *Improved accessibility by adding ADA beach mats and a wheel chair for beach area at McCarthy Beach State Park. *Installed a charging station for electric cars at Gooseberry Falls State Park. *Made repairs to a snowmobile trail in the Moose Lake Area after a storm event in October 2018. Central Region: *Installed new natural playground equipment in Mille Lacs Kathio State Park. *Rehabilitated and expanded the parking lot at the fishing pier at Father Hennepin State Park. *Created a new lifejacket station at Afton State Park. *Added wood railing to hiking trails at Interstate State Park. Southern Region: *Completed culvert work to provide efficient water flow at Nerstrand Big Woods State Park. *Replaced the fireplace in the beach house at Flandrau State Park. *Completed a rip rap stream stabilization project at Fort Ridgely State Park. *Installed an eye wash station and a water heater in Blue Mounds State Park. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2018,500000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to provide funding for regions for high priority projects that are small in nature but have high impact. An example may be rehabilitating a hiking trail that has eroded and is causing sedimentation to a nearby stream or the replacement of a hiking bridge to resolve safety issues for hikers. Because the projects are highly variable in size and scope success is measured by the number of projects completed combined with brief descriptions of the impact.","Legacy dollars at the regional and local level were a critical flexible tool to help field staff solve significant smaller scale problems. Examples of field projects completed in FY18 include: *Adding gravel shoulders to the Lake Bronson Bike Trail between the town of Lake Bronson and Lake Bronson State Park. *Improvements to swing set in the Old Mill State Park campground including new swings chains and ADA-compliant wood chips. *Rehabilitation and realignment of Hallaway Hill Trail in Maplewood State Park *Portable cart for dock winch to allow staff to move winch along the beach to install adjust and remove docks on Garden Island. *Rules signs for horse and group camps at Wild River State Park. *Rehabilitation of the campground trail at Afton State Park. *Slump repairs on the Gateway State Trail. *Repair of trail stairs at Frontenac State Park *Hired trail crew to work on hiking trail projects along the North Shore including at Cascade and Tettegouche State Parks. *Remodel of the interpretive center at St. Croix State Park including upgrades to windows doors and counter space. *Campsite rehabilitation at Side Lake and Beatrice Lake campgrounds in McCarthy Beach State Park. *Redevelopment of the Greenleaf Lake State Recreation Area including a seasonal day-use area accessibility improvements and stormwater management and buffer areas to improve water quality. *New ADA concrete vault toilet at Yellow Medicine Campground in Upper Sioux Agency State Park. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2017,500000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to provide funding for regions for high priority projects that are small in nature but have high impact. An example may be rehabilitating a hiking trail that has eroded and is causing sedimentation to a nearby stream or the replacement of a hiking bridge to resolve safety issues for hikers. Because the projects are highly variable in size and scope success is measured by the number of projects completed combined with brief descriptions of the impact.","Legacy dollars at the regional and local level were a critical flexible tool to help field staff solve significant smaller scale problems. Examples of field projects completed in FY17 include: *ADA sidewalk to vault toilets in picnic area at Buffalo River SP and at sanitation buildings at Glendalough and Hayes Lake SPs. ADA path to fishing pier at Savanna Portage SP. *installation of emergency lighting in Lake Bemidji SP sanitation buildings; *road trail and/or culvert repairs and upgrades at Maplewood Tettegouche and other SPs; *hosted a trail building class and pay for materials to complete a stone staircase at Jay Cooke State Park; *landscaping and parking lot project completion at the recently completed partnership project with the “Friends of Maplewood” State Park Sugar Shack facility; *phone and/or electrical service improvements at Bear Head Lake SP; *replace self-pay station (""iron ranger"") at Gulch Lakes Forest Campground; *dam water level control improvements at Hayes Lake SP; *adding new signs and/or gates at Hayes Lake SP Lake Carlos McCarthy Beach Grand Portage and other state parks and Cuyuna Country SRA; *and moving a camper cabin from Itasca SP to Big Bog SRA.",,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2016,500000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to provide funding for regions for high priority projects that are small in nature but have high impact. An example may be rehabilitating a hiking trail that has eroded and is causing sedimentation to a nearby stream or the replacement of a hiking bridge to resolve safety issues for hikers. Because the projects are highly variable in size and scope success is measured by the number of projects completed combined with brief descriptions of the impact.","Legacy dollars at the regional and local level were a critical flexible tool to help field staff solve significant smaller scale problems. Examples of field projects completed in FY16 include: installation of ADA/accessible fire rings at McCarthy Beach Scenic Glendalough and other state parks; installation of ADA toilet at CJ Ramstad North Shore Trail (Two Harbors Area); installation of solar-powered water pump at Tamarack Horse Camp (St. Croix State Forest); bicycle and helmet acquisition ($300) for a pilot project to reduce fleet costs during staff patrols at Buffalo River State Park; road trail and/or culvert repairs and upgrades at William O'Brien Wild River Forestville/Mystery Cave Gooseberry (Gitchi Gummi Hiking trail connector) and Itasca state parks and Paul Bunyan State Trail; bridge repairs on the Beaver River tributary (Two Harbors Area) and at Camden State Park; phone and/or electrical service improvements at Lake Maria Wild River state parks; replacing a woodstove chimney at Mille Lacs Kathio State Park; and adding new signs and/or gates at Mille Lacs Kathio Lake Maria Wild River Kilen Woods Blue Mounds Nerstrand and other state parks; and swimming pool repair at Flandrau State Park. ",,,,500000,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2015,500000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to provide funding for regions for high priority projects that are small in nature but have high impact. An example may be rehabilitating a hiking trail that has eroded and is causing sedimentation to a nearby stream or the replacement of a hiking bridge to resolve safety issues for hikers. Because the projects are highly variable in size and scope success is measured by the number of projects completed.","Legacy dollars at the regional and local level were a critical flexible tool to help field staff solve significant smaller scale problems. Examples of regional projects completed in FY15 include installation of handicapped accessible fire rings at Buffalo River Glendalough Maplewood and other state parks; bison-related fencing and access road at Blue Mounds and Minneopa state parks; ski trail widening at Gooseberry State Park for improved grooming; and electrical service improvements at the office and picnic shelters at Fort Snelling State Park rail bed trail repair at Zumbro Bottoms Forest Recreation Area; solving the problem of helping visitors navigate between the Munger State Trail and nearby Moose Lake State Park by installing four kiosks with maps and information; and adding new signs at Central Lakes and Heartland state trails. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2014,500000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to provide funding for regions for high priority projects that are small in nature but have high impact. An example may be rehabilitating a hiking trail that has eroded and is causing sedimentation to a nearby stream or the replacement of a hiking bridge to resolve safety issues for hikers. Because the projects are highly variable in size and scope success is measured by the number of projects completed.","This year's projects included repairs to swimming pond infrastructure and lift stations repairs to waterlines and park roads and erosion control on hiking trails.",,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
21695,"DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects",2013,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"This program provides critical assistance to MN DNR Parks and Trails Division Regional and District offices to assist with renewal and rehabilitation efforts prioritized locally by field staff. Projects include the following types: State Park Building and Facilities Emergency Repair and Maintenance, Paved Trail Maintenance and Asset Preservation, and State Park and State Forest Trail Renewal. This project is a newly reorganized budget area that consolidates these three smaller project areas reported on in previous years. ","A small portion of MN DNR Parks and Trails Legacy Funds are distributed to regional offices that achieve key programmatic objectives as part of regional planning efforts. These dollars are key to fulfilling important local initiatives and are accounted for at the end of the fiscal year. ",,2013-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dnr-parks-and-trails-regional-renewal-and-rehabilitation-priority-projects,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2022,1200000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,200,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found or anticipated to be found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist and for the department's laboratory to analyze for these contaminants. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2021,1200000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,200,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found or anticipated to be found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist and for the department's laboratory to analyze for these contaminants ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2020,1700000,"2019 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 8","$1,700,000 the first year and $1,700,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, for improving the department's capacity to monitor the water quality of drinking water sources and to develop interventions to improve water quality, and for the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. Of this amount, $400,000 the first year and $400,000 the second year are for the commissioner to work in cooperation with the commissioners of agriculture, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and natural resources to sample surface water and groundwater, including drinking water sources, and for an assessment to evaluate potential risks from microplastics and nanoplastics and identify appropriate follow-up actions. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Initiative reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Public information sheets are created for both chemicals that have completed screening and chemicals that have published guidance and are made available on the Minnesota Department of Health website. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2019,1100000,"2017 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 17, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100, the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Initiative reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Public information sheets are created for both chemicals that have completed screening and chemicals that have published guidance and are made available on the Minnesota Department of Health website. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2018,1100000,"2017 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 17, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100, the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Initiative reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Public information sheets are created for both chemicals that have completed screening and chemicals that have published guidance and are made available on the Minnesota Department of Health website. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2017,1100000,"Minnesota Session Law, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Screening Profiles are created for screening chemicals and Information Sheets are created for chemicals with published guidance. These resources for stakeholders are available at: http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/risk/guidance/dwec/chemunderrev.html. ",,,,,,,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2016,1100000,"Minnesota Session Law, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. The commissioner shall contract with the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to provide an independent review of the department's drinking water contaminants of emerging concern program. The review must include an assessment of the process used by the department to rank contaminants that are threats to drinking water supplies and include a comparison of efforts at the department with efforts by other states and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The review must be submitted to the Clean Water Council and the chairs and ranking minority members of the House of Representatives and Senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources by June 1, 2016.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Screening Profiles are created for screening chemicals and Information Sheets are created for chemicals with published guidance. These resources for stakeholders are available at: http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/risk/guidance/dwec/chemunderrev.html. ","At the close of 2016, the Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program has screened approximately 12 contaminants. Published health-based has been completed for four contaminants: - 17alpha Ethinylestradiol - Mestranol - Dichlorofluoromethane (Freon 21) - Microcystin Guidance for an additional three contaminants is currently pending. The MDH Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program is on track to meet the goals for screening and guidance development for the 2016-2017 biennium. ",,,,,,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2015,1150000,"Minnesota Session Law, Article 2, Section 8 (a) ","$1,150,000 the first year and $1,150,000 the second are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits, including triclosan, and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,9.5,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2014,1150000,"Minnesota Session Law, Article 2, Section 8 (a) ","$1,150,000 the first year and $1,150,000 the second are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits, including triclosan, and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,9.5,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2013,1020000,"Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 6, Article 2, Section 8 (a)","$1,020,000 the first year and $1,020,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2012,1020000,"Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 6, Article 2, Section 8 (a)","$1,020,000 the first year and $1,020,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2011,744717,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (b)","$445,000 the first year and $890,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists. The commissioner shall characterize and issue health-based guidance for three or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2010, and seven or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2011.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2010,250291,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (b)","$445,000 the first year and $890,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists. The commissioner shall characterize and issue health-based guidance for three or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2010, and seven or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2011.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2024,3603658,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2023,2682124,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","The division's target for 2023 is to host a total of 2,000,000 visits to state park visitor centers. The division's target for 2023 is to offer more than 8,000 interpretive programs statewide. The division's target for 2023 is to provide programs for a total of 250,000 participants at state park and trail interpretive programs. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2022,2533670,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","The division's target for 2022 is to host a total of 2,000,000 visits to state park visitor centers. The division's target for 2022 is to offer more than 8,000 interpretive programs statewide. The division's target for 2022 is to provide programs for a total of 250,000 participants at state park and trail interpretive programs. ","In 2022, the division hosted 1,347,960 visits at state park visitor centers. Minnesota state parks and trails offered 6524 interpretive programs and events at state parks and trails in 2022. Through the efforts of Legacy-funded interpretive naturalists and Naturalist Corps interns, overall program attendance reached 162,957 in 2022. Although 2022 fell short of proposed measurable outcomes, programs and program attendance increased from COVID-impacted 2020 and 2021. Normal programming efforts resumed after COVID closures lifted, but numerous interpretive vacancies impacted visitor center hours and number of programs offered in 2022. ",,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2021,1750227,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2020,2080961,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","The division's target for 2020 is to reach a total of 2 000 000 people at state park visitor centers.",,,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2019,1405892,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division's target for 2019 is to reach a total of 2 000 000 people at state park visitor centers.","The division reached 1 891 864 members of the public at state park visitor centers in 2019. (Note: Fort Snelling State Park Visitor Center was closed most of summer 2019.) Legacy-funded interpretive services staff completed a number of exhibit projects in 2019. Most notably the Whitewater State Park Visitor Center indoor exhibit was completed.",,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2018,1229912,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division's target for 2018 is to reach a total of 2 000 000 people at state park visitor centers.","The division reached 1 873 478 members of the public at state park visitor centers in 2018.",,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2017,1375158,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division's target for 2017 is to reach a total of 2 000 000 people at state park visitor centers., The division's target for 2017 is to offer more than 8 000 interpretive programs statewide. , The division's target for 2017 is to reach a total of at least 250 000 people at state park and trail interpretive programs.","The division reached 2 134 844 members of the public at state park visitor centers in 2017., Parks and Trails offered 8793 interpretive programs and events at state parks and trails in 2017., Through the efforts of Legacy-funded Naturalist Corps seasonal and permanent interpretive naturalists overall program attendance reached 257 733 in 2017.",,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2016,1326894,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division's target for 2016 is to reach a total of at least 200 000 people at state park and trail interpretive programs., The division's target for 2016 is to reach a total of 2 000 000 people at state park visitor centers., The division's target for 2016 is to offer more than 9 000 interpretive programs statewide. ","Through the efforts of Legacy-funded Naturalist Corps seasonal and permanent interpretive naturalists overall program attendance reached 278 880 in 2016. This exceeds the goal of reaching 200 000 people., 2 168 511 people attended an event or visited an exhibit at a DNR Park visitor center. This is well in excess of the goal., Parks and Trails offered 8 912 interpretive programs at state parks and trails in 2016. Despite having fewer Naturalist Corps positions in 2016 we still nearly met our ambitious goal.",,,,1326894,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2015,1363693,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","Increase participation in interpretive programs by 50 000 people with the added support of Naturalist Corps year-round naturalists and seasonal naturalists., In calendar year 2008 attendance at visitor center exhibits was 1 123 534 people. The division's target for 2015 is to increase that number by 100 000 people. , The division's target for 2015 is to offer more than 9 000 interpretive programs statewide. ","Through the efforts of Legacy-funded Naturalist Corps and seasonal and permanent interpretive naturalists overall program attendance has increased by more than 37% from 219 675 in 2009 to 302 154 in 2015. This exceeds the goal of reaching an additional 50 000 people with increased interpretive staffing., 2 152 917 people attended an event or visited an exhibit at a DNR Park visitor center. This is well in excess of the goal., Parks and Trails offered 9 550 interpretive programs at state parks and trails in 2015 in excess of the goal.",,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2014,1417275,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In calendar year 2008 attendance at visitor center exhibits was 1 123 534 people. The division's target for 2014 is to increase that number by 100 000 people. , The division's target for 2014 is to offer more than 5 000 interpretive programs statewide. , Increase participation in interpretive programs by 50 000 people with the added support of Naturalist Corps year-round naturalists and seasonal naturalists.","With a 297 978 increase since 2008 2014 visitor center attendance exceeded the goal., In 2014 a total of 9083 scheduled and requested state parks and trail interpretive programs were presented statewide. This far exceeded the 5 000 program goal., With the addition of Legacy-funded Naturalist Corps and seasonal and permanent interpretive naturalists in the spring of 2010 overall program attendance rates have increased by 31% from 219 675 in 2009 to 288 221 in 2014. This exceeds the goal of reaching an additional 50 000 people with increased interpretive staffing.",,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2013,942250,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","The division's target for 2013 is to offer more than 5 000 interpretive programs statewide. , Increase participation in interpretive programs by 50 000 people with the added support of Naturalist Corps year-round naturalists and seasonal naturalists so the goal is 269 675., In calendar year 2008 attendance at visitor center exhibits was 1 123 534 people. The division's target for 2013 is to increase that number by 100 000 people. ","As reported in previous years this measure includes the number of scheduled and requested programs plus the number of special events., With the addition of Legacy-funded Naturalist Corps and seasonal and permanent interpretive naturalists in the spring of 2010 overall program attendance rates have increased by 30% from 219 675 in 2009 to 285 723 in 2013. This exceeds the goal of reaching an additional 50 000 people with increased interpretive staffing., In 2013 reported visitor center attendance was 1 222 992. This number nearly reaches the division's goal fo 100 000 over the 2008 attendance number.",,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2012,942250,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","In calendar year 2008 attendance at visitor center exhibits was 1 123 534 people. The division's target for 2012 is to increase that number by 100 000 people., The division's target for 2012 is to offer more than 5 000 interpretive programs statewide. , Increase participation in interpretive programs by 50 000 people with the added support of Naturalist Corps year-round naturalists and seasonal naturalists.","In 2012 visitor centers at parks throughout the state saw 1 206 742 visitors. This number came close to the 1 223 534 visitor goal. , In 2012 a total of 9 156 statewide interpretive programs were offered to the public. This far exceeded the 5 000 program goal. , With the addition of Legacy-funded Naturalist Corps and seasonal and permanent interpretive naturalists in the spring of 2010 overall program attendance rates have increased by 23% from 219 675 in 2009 to 285 620 in 2012. This exceeds the goal of reaching an additional 50 000 people with increased interpretive staffing.",,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2011,1180000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2 (1)",,"In calendar year 2008 attendance at visitor center exhibits was 1 123 534 people. The division's target for this year is to increase that number by 100 000 people., The division's target for this year is to offer more than 5 000 interpretive programs statewide. , Increase participation in interpretive programs by 50 000 people with the added support from our Naturalist Corps the 80% year-round naturalists and seasonal naturalists.","In 2011 due to a 3 week state government shutdown that closed parks from July 1-21 attendance at visitor centers dropped to 985 811 visitors and did not surpass the 1 223 534 visitor goal. , The division has significantly exceeded the original goal for the number of interpretive programs programs. In calendar years 2009 and 2010 5 374 and 8 571 programs were held respectively. In 2011 a total of 6 172 interpretive programs were delivered. This lower number reflects a three-week state shutdown., Interpretive programs reached 219 675 in 2009 before the addition of new Legacy-funded interpretive staff. In 2011 interpretive programs reached 216 840. These lower numbers were due to a state government shutdown that closed parks from July 1-21 typically the busiest weeks for interpretation. Legacy-funded Naturalist Corps seasonal and permanent interpretive naturalist positions reached 98 272 of the total program participants in 2011.",,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
3230,"Education and interpretive services",2010,573000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2 (1)",,"In calendar year 2008 attendance at visitor center exhibits was 1 123 534 people. The division's target for the biennium is to increase that number by 200 000 people., The division's target for the biennium is to double interpretive program numbers to offer 5 000 interpretive programs statewide. , Increase participation in interpretive programs by 50 000 people with the added support from our Naturalist Corps the 80% year-round naturalists and seasonal naturalists.","The Division of Parks and Trails has significantly exceeded the original attendance goal by steadily increasing attendance at visitor center exhibits since 2008 by 276 000 people. This was accomplished by increasing staffing at visitor centers updating exhibits and extending hours of operation., The division has significantly exceeded the original goal for the number of programs. In calendar years 2009 and 2010 5 374 and 8 571 programs were held respectively. , Since the addition of the Naturalist Corps 80% year-round naturalists and seasonal naturalists in spring 2010 overall program attendance rates have increased by 21% from 219 675 in 2009 to 266 403 in 2010. ",,,,,,,,,,"The Parks and Trails Division is creating innovative programs to attract new audiences to Minnesota state parks and trails. Skill-building programs, such as ""I Can Camp!,"" provide a trial opportunity by eliminating the barriers of needing to have pre-existing knowledge or gear for the activity. Special events, such as candlelight events and First Day Hikes, generate enthusiasm and a sense of urgency to visit.  Interactive touch-screen displays, videos and podcasts keep Minnesota state parks and trails current with the ways the public wants to receive information, while engaging interpretive exhibits catch the attention of visitors. Additional naturalist positions allows the division to interact with more people, and Minnesota Naturalist Corps internships provide mentored experiences for college students. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Conrad,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint PAul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",jennifer.conrad@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-and-interpretive-services-0,,,,
34117,"Education Outreach for National History Day",2016,206577,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","Increase in the amount of classroom support available to middle and high school teachers who apply the National History Day program in Minnesota classrooms. Project will measure total hours of service to teachers and students by professional staff from MNHS, undergraduate mentors from the U of M, MNSCU and private colleges, and supplementary classroom support staff. Effects of increased student support will be measured in terms of research skills, academic engagement, vocabulary, library use, writing and academic aspiration. Support for teachers will be measured in terms of effectiveness of instruction, access to external resources, support for academic rigor. Impact on undergraduates will be measured in terms of service learning goals, improved academic skills, career aspirations. Campus immersion programs will measure college readiness for skills (research and analysis) and aspiration and feeling of preparedness for higher education.",,,177000,"University of Minnesota, St. Cloud State University, Minnesota State University, Moorhead, St. Paul Public Schools, Minneapolis Public Schools",206577,23031,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",2.10,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Through this program, partners are extending the reach of National History Day in Minnesota. MNHS professional staff members coordinate school services with an emphasis on support for students from diverse backgrounds. Higher education partnerships help build college readiness skills for middle and high school students and strengthen the mentoring skills of Minnesota college students. Undergraduate students from the U of M and MNSCU colleges are trained to become History Day mentors and work with History Day students at inner city and rural schools. These partnerships have established a national model for creating ""campus to classroom"" connections where undergraduate students support classroom teachers by advising History Day students with topic selection, research, and project development. These academic skills make students more college-ready and the relationships with mentors increase aspiration for higher education.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/education-outreach-national-history-day-0,,,,
10004455,"Effects of Grazing Versus Fire for Prairie Management",2016,414000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03o","$414,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to compare the effects of conservation grazing and prescribed fire on tallgrass prairie plants and pollinators in Minnesota in order to inform and improve land management practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03o.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Susan,Galatowitsch,"U of MN - AIS Center","2003 Upper Buford Cir, 135 Skok Hall","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3242",galat001@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/effects-grazing-versus-fire-prairie-management-0,,,,
10004454,"Emerald Ash Borer Ecological and Hydrological Impacts – Phase II",2016,400000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06b","$400,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to assess the potential impacts of emerald ash borer on Minnesota black ash forests and quantify potential impacts on native forest vegetation, invasive species spread, and hydrology. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06b.pdf,2015-07-01,2020-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Anthony,D'Amato,"U of MN","1530 Cleveland Ave N","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 625-3733",damato@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/emerald-ash-borer-ecological-and-hydrological-impacts-phase-ii-0,,,,
33221,"Emerging Issues Account",2016,1000000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 10","$1,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to an emerging issues account authorized in Minnesota Statutes, section 116P.08, subdivision 4, paragraph (d).","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_10.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Becca,Nash,"Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources","100 Rev Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, 65 State Office Bldg","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 296-6264",becca.nash@lccmr.leg.mn,,"Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/emerging-issues-account-0,,,,
34064,"MN Encyclopedia Entries: Fur Trade Era Site Excavations in Wadena County",2016,1760,"Laws of Minnesota for 2011 Chapter 6, Article 4, Subdivision 5, Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants.","Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants. $5,250,000 the first year and $5,250,000 the second year are for history programs and projects operated or conducted by or through local, county, regional, or other historical or cultural organizations; or for activities to preserve significant historic and cultural resources.","Available upon request. Contact",,,,"Available upon request. Contact",1760,,"Clark Anderson, Helen Apel, John Crandall, Larry Denny, Jim Hofer, Carmen Pederson, Bette Peterson, Elaine Schmitz, Sylvia Tappe, Betty White",0.00,"Wadena County Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To create Wadena County entries on the Fur Trade era for the MNopedia project for online research.",,,2015-12-01,2016-12-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Lina,Belar,"Wadena County Historical Society","603 N Jefferson",Wadena,MN,56482,218-346-7676,,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,"Statewide, Wadena",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mn-encyclopedia-entries-fur-trade-era-site-excavations-wadena-county,,"Minnesota Historical Society Governing Board: William R. Stoeri, President Missy S. Thompson, Vice President Ruth Huss, Vice President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary Dean M. Nelson, Treasurer Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Robert Bruininks Judith S. Corson D. Stephen Elliott Phyllis Rawls Goff William D. Green David R. Hakensen Ruth S. Huss Martha Kaemmer Dennis L. Lamkin David M. Larson Charles Mahar Dean M. Nelson Elizabeth M. Nordlie Dennis Nguyen Peter R. Reis Hussein Samatar Simon Stevens Susan Kenny Stevens William R. Stoeri Karen Wilson Thissen Missy Staples Thompson Eleanor Winston Ex-Officio: Mark Dayton, Governor Yvonne Prattner Solon Lieutenant Governor Mark Ritchie, Secretary of State Lori Swanson, Attorney General Rebecca Otto, State Auditor",,
10004480,"Endangered Bats, White-Nose Syndrome, and Forest Habitat",2016,1250000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03i","$1,250,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources in cooperation with the University of Minnesota and the United States Forest Service to survey and radio-track endangered bats to define and understand summer forest habitat use in order to minimize forestry impacts and mitigate white-nose syndrome disease impacts. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"MN DNR","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03i.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Baker,"MN DNR","500 Lafayette Rd, Box 25","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5073",richard.baker@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/endangered-bats-white-nose-syndrome-and-forest-habitat-0,,,,
34077,"Engaging High School Students in Minnesota History through Internships",2016,6297,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","1. Continue to place diverse students, reach 85% diversity rate. We have a 73% diversity rate in all teen programs at this time for FY16. The Legacy program alone reached 50%. Two out of the four students were from diverse communities. However, we will extend this program into the summer for FY16 and anticipate an increase. 2. 30% of students go to another MNHS teen program or come from another MNHS teen program i.e. TAC, SHIP, History Day, Mentor, ACTC, College Intern, Fellows or continue to volunteer with us. For all teen programs we had a 57% crossover rate for the beginning of FY16. For the Legacy Program alone, we have four students who are new to MNHS but we anticipate some of them continuing their involvement after their experience in Spring 2016. 3. 90% feel that this program has increased their job skills or knowledge of public history. 100% of high school students in Summer 2015 said their experience increased their job skills and critical thinking and problem solving skills. We have not surveyed the spring 2016 Legacy program students yet because they have just started.",,,2000,"St. Paul Chamber",6297,1082,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.10,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Minnesota Historical Society strives to attract high school interns from underrepresented communities to encourage engagement and to diversify the institution. Legacy funds supported five gallery assistants in spring 2015. High school students placed in this program get professional on-the-job experience interacting with visitors in the History Center galleries and at public events. These students contributed more than 400 hours to MNHS. Eighty percent of these students were from communities of color.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/engaging-high-school-students-minnesota-history-through-internships-0,,,,
34056,"Evaluation of Building and Exhibit Lighting",2016,7293,,,"Available upon request. Contact grants@mnhs.org","Targets were achieved",,,"Available upon request. Contact grants@mnhs.org",7293,,"1. Nicholas Ostapenko, President, Duluth Law, Attorney, Retired BG MNARNG 2. Robert Boone, VP Personnel, Cambridge Schools, Retired, CSM MNARNG 3. Thomas Chial, Secretary, Retired, MNARNG 4. Tim Meininger, VP Finance, Retired Banker 5. Stephen Osman, VP Programs, MN Historical Society, Retired 6. Lyle Doerr, Board Member, Retired. MG MNARNG 7. Doug Hanson, Board Member, Radio Station Manager, Willmar, Retired CSM MNARNG 8. Betty Masoner, Board Member, Educator, Retired 9. Paul Monteen, Board Member, Retired Law Enforcement, St Paul 10. Jack Johnson, University of Minnesota, Retired 11. Frank Messina, Board Member, Owner Messina Realty, Duluth 12. Mark Vargas, Board Member, St. Cloud State University Library Dean 13. Dean Ascheman, Board Member, Retired IBM 14. Mark Ritchie, Board Member, Retired MN Secretary of State 13. Richard Nash, Board Member, MN National Guard, Adjutant General 14. Jon VanderHagen, Board Member, Urgent Care Doctor, Brainerd 15. Jeff Thielen Executive, Director, MN Military Museum, ex officio Member 16. Doug Bekke, Curator, MN Military Museum, ex officio Member",0.00,"Minnesota Military Museum","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To hire a qualified museum lighting professional to develop a museum lighting plan.",,,2015-12-01,2016-12-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Douglas,Bekke,"Minnesota Military Museum","Camp Ripley, 15000 Highway 115","Little Falls",MN,56345,612-618-6997,dpbekke@yahoo.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/evaluation-building-and-exhibit-lighting,,,,0
34059,"Evaluate Current and Redesigned Lighting",2016,8545,,,"Available upon request. Contact grants@mnhs.org","Achieved...The project goal was ""To assess current lighting in two buildings housing artifacts most sensitive to light sources and to identify and recommend improved lighting systems to stabilize the quality of artifacts."" Rummel's Final Report developed a long-term preservation plan for these artifacts.",,,"Available upon request. Contact grants@mnhs.org",8545,,"Bernie Aronson,Kate Aydin, Rolland Digre,Roger Hexem,Dean Janiszeski,Lyndon Johnson,Gail Kvernmo,Orlan Sandro,Marc Widmark",0.00,"Lincoln County Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To hire a qualified museum lighting professional to develop a museum lighting plan.",,,2015-12-01,2016-12-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Roger,Hexem,"Lincoln County Historical Society","P.O Box 211, 610 Elm St.",Hendricks,MN,56136,507-275-5247,hexemw@Yahoo.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/evaluate-current-and-redesigned-lighting,,,,0
34083,"Exhibitions Programming",2016,51788,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Projected Attendance for FY 16 is 20,000 participating in programs. Based on past evaluations, we anticipate our outcomes will be: 1) 90% of participants will agree/strongly agree the programs increased their knowledge and understanding of topic; 2) 80% of participants will have increased their knowledge of Minnesota's history, places, and culture; and cultural traditions; 3) 80 percent will feel that the programs were welcoming and inclusive of their identities. The Net Promoter Score will be 64+.",,,,,51788,956,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.10,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS exhibitions are supported by diverse programming that complements the content of the exhibitions. These additional programs augment and promote the rich stories of Minnesota's history. In FY16, programs included lectures, musical performances, hands-on family activities, and other events. In particular, three exhibitions",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/exhibitions-programming-0,,,,
34112,"Expanding Support and Training Opportunities for Museum Professionals",2016,24687,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","Part-time managing director hired (twice, due to turnover), revised MAM bylaws, membership survey conducted, museum tool kit created, professional development programs implemented (Summit at Summit and MAM Mixers).",,,,,24687,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Minnesota Association of Museums collaborates with the Minnesota Historical Society in providing professional development and support to history museum professionals across the state. In FY15, this partnership will assist with the funding of a part-time managing coordinator to begin implementing findings on history museum continuing education needs.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/expanding-support-and-training-opportunities-museum-professionals-0,,,,
34101,"First Avenue Project",2016,67941,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Outcome goals: MHC attendance greater than 250,000 in FY18. Net Promoter Score goal +50 or higher. Increased interest in, knowledge of and appreciation for Minnesota history. Increased appreciation of MHS and its programs.",,,,,67941,1580,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.20,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Since 1981, the downtown Minneapolis nightclub First Avenue has been the regional standard-bearer for contemporary music, recognized the world over as the premier venue for the ""Minneapolis Sound""",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/first-avenue-project,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2014,55000,,,,,,,,,,,,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2015,20000,,,,,,,,,,,.2,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2016,27493,,,,,,,,,,,.2,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2018,24307,,,,,,,,,,,.2,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2022,45572,,,,,,,,,,,.4,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2023,9900,,,,,,,,,,,.09,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2024,900,,,,,,,,,,,,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2025,545000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(c); M.L. 2024, Ch. 106, Article 2, Section 5","M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(c): $455,000 the first year and $455,000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants, including PFAS compounds, and monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. M.L. 2024, Ch. 106, Article 2, Section 5: $90,000 the second year is for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants, including PFAS compounds, and monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. This appropriation is added to the appropriation in Laws 2023, chapter 40, article 2, section 5, paragraph (c). ","In FY25, the DNR will collect fish from 130 waterbodies. Resulting sampling data will be used to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. 30 of the FY25 waterbodies were selected to overlap with a MNDNR study of zebra mussel infested walleye fisheries. Overlap of contaminants sampling with this study will help investigate the potential for increased mercury bioaccumulation in infested waters which is an emerging concern. The remaining 100 waterbody samples will consist of multiple fish species of size classes relevant to human consumption. 50 of the FY24 waterbodies will also be analyzed for PFAS. 9 river sites will also be analyzed for PCBs.   ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2024,455000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(c)","$455,000 the first year and $455,000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants, including PFAS compounds, and monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. "," In FY24 the DNR will collect fish from 130 waterbodies. Resulting sampling data will be used to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. 23 of the FY24 waterbodies were selected to overlap with a MNDNR study of zebra mussel infested walleye fisheries. Overlap of contaminants sampling with this study will help investigate the potential for increased mercury bioaccumulation in infested waters which is an emerging concern. The remaining 107 waterbody samples will consist of multiple fish species of size classes relevant to human consumption. 38 of the FY24 waterbodies will also be analyzed for PFAS. 4 of these sites will be used to compare transcriptome differences between fish in high and low PFAS concentration waters. 3 river sites will also be analyzed for PCBs. ","In FY24, the DNR collected and tested fish samples from a total of 130 waterbodies for contaminants testing. Each waterbody sample consisted of multiple fish species. Fish species and size classes’ samples were relevant to human consumption. An average of 20 fish were sampled for each waterbody with a total of 2,205 fish tested for mercury, 40 fish tested for PCBs, and 493 fish were tested for PFAS. Contaminant data were collected, processed, and delivered to MPCA partners to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends.   ",,,,175941,32498,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2023,175000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$175000 the first year and $175000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. "," In FY23 the DNR will collect fish from an additional 89 waterbodies in addition to the surplus waterbodies collected but not tested in FY22, for a total of 150 waterbodies. Resulting sampling data will be used to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. 28 of the FY23 waterbodies were selected to overlap with a MNDNR study of zebra mussel infested walleye fisheries. Overlap of contaminants sampling with this study will help investigate the potential for increased mercury bioaccumulation in infested waters which is an emerging concern. The remaining 122 waterbody samples will consist of multiple fish species of size classes relevant to human consumption. "," In FY23 the DNR collected and tested fish samples from a total of 120 waterbodies for contaminants testing. Each waterbody sample consisted of multiple fish species. Fish species and size classes’ samples were relevant to human consumption. An average of 20 fish were sampled for each waterbody with a total of 2,471 fish tested for mercury, 35 fish tested for PCBs, and 63 fish tested for PFAS. Contaminant data were collected, processed, and delivered to MPCA partners to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,159600,11497,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2022,175000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$175000 the first year and $175000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. ","In FY22, the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds. ","In FY22, the DNR collected and tested fish samples from a total of 116 waterbodies for contaminants testing. Each waterbody sample consisted of multiple fish species. Fish species and size classes’ samples were relevant to human consumption. An average of 25 fish were sampled for each waterbody with a total of 2,538 fish tested for mercury, 44 fish tested for PCBs, and 333 fish tested for PFAS. Fish samples from an additional 61 surplus waterbodies were sampled and samples archived for testing in FY23. Contaminant data were collected, processed, and delivered to MPCA partners to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,159600,11497,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2021,135000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. ","The May 2020 budget forecast required agencies to reduce Clean Water Fund spending by $17.6 million dollars. Funding for supplemental fish contaminant testing was eliminated for FY21 due in part to the inability to collect fish in as many lakes as normal. ","The May 2020 budget forecast required agencies to reduce Clean Water Fund spending by $17.6 million dollars. Funding for supplemental fish contaminant testing was eliminated for FY21 due in part to the inability to collect fish in as many lakes as normal. ",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2020,135000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. ","In FY20 the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds. ","In FY20 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds. ",,,,126427,8572,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2019,135000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time.","In FY19 the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds.","FY19 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination using the Clean Water Fund to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,128427,7574,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2018,135000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time.","In FY18 the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination that will be used by other agencies to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds.","FY18 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,120258,7371,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2017,135000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","(c) $135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. (d)","In FY17 the DNR will test 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants. ","In FY17 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination that is used by other agencies for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds.",,,,126427,7574,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2016,135000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","(c) $135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. (d)","Every year the DNR will test 80 lake and river sites for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY16 the DNR tested 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants.",,,,138587,14274,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2015,135000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time. ","Every year the DNR will test 80 lake and river sites for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY15 the DNR tested 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants.",,,,144237,,,0.2,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2014,135000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time. ","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","FY14 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants. ",,,,120482,4180,,0.2,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2013,130000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$130000 the first year and $130000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","FY13 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,113269,,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2012,130000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$130000 the first year and $130000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","FY12 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,112245,17725,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2011,132000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY11 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,107961,24038,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2010,130000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY10 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,,,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
35169,"Folk and Traditional Arts",2016,48439,"Laws of Minnesota 2015 Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 3"," ACHF Cultural Heritage","To inspire and educate future generations of Somalis, and inform non-Somalis, of the rich spoken word traditions of Somalia. Number of participants at public discussions; TV broadcast viewers; visitor surveys at the Museum and at public screenings; number of classrooms and students that use the program. 2: Young Somalis gain pride and respect for their culture's spoken word traditions, and seek to express their own poetic voices. Evaluation data from leaders at community events and educators in schools will collect reactions and responses, and indicate numbers of students who have been inspired try writing their own poetry.","SOMALIA: A Nation Of Poets documentary was produced in collaboration with the Somali Museum of Minnesota and Twin Cities PBS (TPT). The screening of SOMALIA: A Nation Of Poets was attended by 200 Somali youth, elders, artists in the Somali community, public officials, educators and non-Somalis. We held a panel discussion at the screening event for the documentary to that allowed the public to engage with Somali artists about the significance of Somali poetry. 2: SOMALIA: A Nation Of Poets that educates future generations of Somalis, and inform non-Somalis, of the rich spoken word traditions of Somalia. Number of participants at public discussions; TV broadcast viewers; visitor surveys at the Museum and at public screenings; number of classrooms and students that use the program.",,25111,"Other, local or private",73550,1600,"Ali Eli, Barkat Abdi, Hussein Mohamed, Aisha Mukhtar, Guled Abdullahi",,"Ka Joog","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Folk and Traditional Arts",,"Ka Joog and the Somali Museum of Minnesota will create a video documentary on the origins and importance of Somali poetry and storytelling traditions for public television broadcast, public workshops, and classrooms in Minnesota.",2016-01-01,2016-12-31,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Mohamed,Farah,"Ka Joog","1420 Washington Ave S",Minneapolis,MN,55454,"(612) 795-1589 ",mfarah@kajoog.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota State Arts Board",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/folk-and-traditional-arts-72,"Jewell Arcoren: Community resources coordinator of Healing Place Collaborative; Rhonda Dass: Associate professor of anthropology and director of museum studies, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Mary Erickson: Fiber artist, museum exhibit researcher; Stanley Maroushek: Owner, Slim's Woodshed and Museum; Linda McShannock: Curator of textiles and clothing collection, Minnesota Historical Society; Scott Pollock: Director of exhibitions, collections and programs, American Swedish Institute","Ardell Brede: Mayor of Rochester, elected 2002.; Peggy Burnet: Businesswoman, art collector, and community volunteer. Chair of the Nominating Committee, Smithsonian National Board. Trustee, Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Vice Chair, Minnesota State Arts Board.; Michael Charron: Dean of the School of the Arts, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota. Chair, Minnesota State Arts Board.; Rebecca Davis-Lee: Touring pianist, piano and music theory teacher; Sean Dowse, Executive director, Sheldon Theatre. Board member for Minnesota Music Coalition, Minnesota Citizens for the Arts, and Anderson Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Treasurer, Minnesota State Arts Board.; David Glenn: Executive director of the Minnesota Project, ceramic artist; Thomas Moss: Consultant to nonprofits and government agencies; Janice Sivertson: Gallery owner and visual artist; Dobson West: Senior advisor, Spell Capital Partners Fund","Executive director Sue Gens (651) 215-1600",1
34051,"General Preservation Assessment Survey and Long Range Conservation Plan",2016,6170,"Laws of Minnesota for 2011 Chapter 6, Article 4, Subdivision 5, Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants.","Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants. $5,250,000 the first year and $5,250,000 the second year are for history programs and projects operated or conducted by or through local, county, regional, or other historical or cultural organizations; or for activities to preserve significant historic and cultural resources.","Available upon request. Contact",,,,"Available upon request. Contact",6170,,"President Jina Penn-Tracy ",0.00,"Caponi Art Park","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To hire a qualified museum consultant to conduct a general preservation needs assessment survey and long range collections preservation plan.",,,2015-09-01,2016-09-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Cheryl,Caponi,"Caponi Art Park","1205 Diffley Road",Eagan,MN,55123,651-454-9412,,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/general-preservation-assessment-survey-and-long-range-conservation-plan-0,,"Minnesota Historical Society Governing Board: William R. Stoeri, President Missy S. Thompson, Vice President Ruth Huss, Vice President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary Dean M. Nelson, Treasurer Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Robert Bruininks Judith S. Corson D. Stephen Elliott Phyllis Rawls Goff William D. Green David R. Hakensen Ruth S. Huss Martha Kaemmer Dennis L. Lamkin David M. Larson Charles Mahar Dean M. Nelson Elizabeth M. Nordlie Dennis Nguyen Peter R. Reis Hussein Samatar Simon Stevens Susan Kenny Stevens William R. Stoeri Karen Wilson Thissen Missy Staples Thompson Eleanor Winston Ex-Officio: Mark Dayton, Governor Yvonne Prattner Solon Lieutenant Governor Mark Ritchie, Secretary of State Lori Swanson, Attorney General Rebecca Otto, State Auditor",,
34128,"Grants Program Admin",2016,552500,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4, (b) (1) Grants","Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants $5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for history programs and projects operated or conducted by or through local, county, regional, or other historical or cultural organizations or for activities to preserve significant historic and cultural resources. Funds are to be distributed through a competitive grant process. The Minnesota Historical Society shall administer these funds using established grant mechanisms, with assistance from the advisory committee created under Laws 2009, chapter 172, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4, paragraph (b), item (ii).","Measurable outcomes include the number of counties, applicants, and grantees served through the grants program and the types of grants awarded. In addition, grants staff measure the amount of technical assistance provided, including through workshops, site visits, phone calls, emails, and face-to-face consultation. Grants staff also monitor the improvement grant applicants make with each grant application and the degree to which project results meet professional standards, ensuring Minnesota's historic resources are properly preserved.",,,,,552500,59296,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",5.40,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The administration of the Minnesota Historical and Cultural Heritage Grant Program ensures rigor, fairness, honesty, integrity, and consistency in the distribution of ACHF funding. Grants staff consult on, review, evaluate, respond to, mentor, coach, shape, and monitor grant projects from initial applicant contact to project closeout, reporting, and monitoring. Throughout this process, grants staff provide effective training and technical assistance for grant applicants and recipients, ensuring projects meet professional standards and building the capacity of grant applicants and recipients to preserve Minnesota's history. Technical assistance includes site visits and monitoring visits on projects throughout the state, as dictated by Office of Grants Management Policies or as needed in order to ensure successful completion of the grant. Grant Program Administration also supports the Historic Resources Advisory Committee, a volunteer committee established by legislature to provide policy and grantmaking guidance on expenditures of funds.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Howard,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3000,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/grants-program-admin-2,,,,
34073,"Historic Fort Snelling Planning",2016,25000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","The planning project contributes to Historic Fort Snelling revitalization by supporting vital cross-departmental collaboration in addition to coordination of stakeholders, professional and technical service providers, and consultants. Measurable outcomes are in the completion of identified milestones and deliverables.",,,,,25000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Historic Fort Snelling is an MNHS historic site targeted for revitalization. This revitalization is one of MNHS's current strategic priorities. The Historic Fort Snelling revitalization project completed a master plan in June 2015. The predesign phase kicked off in September 2015 and continues through FY16. The project manager position, which coordinates various MNHS educational programs and building activities, was partially supported with Legacy funds.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Capital Development/Rehabilitation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/historic-fort-snelling-planning,,,,
34113,"Historic Preservation Corps Pilot Phase",2016,212500,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","Hands on training provided to crew leaders and members; One crew of five people worked throughout the 2015 field season.",,,18500,"Project host contribution in 2016 field season: $17,000; $1,500 foundation grant.",212500,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Northern Bedrock Historic Preservation Corps and MNHS are refining the lessons learned from the fall 2014 demonstration project to increase the viability of a historic preservation activity built on a conservation corps model. The pilot phase focused on building the capacity of the corps through diversification of revenue and expansion of service projects, skills training, and networks.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/historic-preservation-corps-pilot-phase,,,,
34124,"Historic Recognition Grants",2016,125000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (6) Historic Recognition Grants","$275,000 the first year and $275,000 the second year are for a competitive grants program to provide grants for projects carried out by nonprofit organizations or public entities that preserve, recognize, and promote the historic legacy of Minnesota, with a focus on commemoration of Minnesota's role in the American Civil War. The Minnesota Historical Society shall work collaboratively with the Governor's Civil War Commemorative Task Force to determine project priorities. Funds may be used for projects administered or delivered by the Minnesota Historical Society in cooperation with the task force.","Grant applicants are required to describe the project's anticipated impact by developing short-term, intermediate, and long-term evaluation metrics in order to evaluate project success. For example, they might include the number of people reached through a program, the types of skills the organization gained through the project, the monuments conserved, or the properties surveyed or designated.",,,,,125000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Through a competitive process, the Historic Recognition Grant Program awards grants to historical organizations statewide to support programs that preserve, recognize, and promote the historic legacy of Minnesota, with a focus on commemoration of Minnesota's role in the American Civil War.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Howard,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3000,,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/historic-recognition-grants,,,,
34076,"History Commemoration Initiatives, World War I Initiative",2016,141068,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Participation levels of schools/students; veteran groups/veterans and active military; related organizations and their members",,,,,141068,11519,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",1.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To coincide with the centennial of the entrance of the United States into World War I, MNHS is developing a series of public programs, school programs, publications, and online resources to increase awareness and understanding of the World War I era and its enduring legacy for Minnesota and its people. Special outreach to the veterans' community and members of the active military is underway.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/history-commemoration-initiatives-world-war-i-initiative,,,,
34084,"History Live! Interactive Video Conferencing",2016,160874,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Measureable outcomes are outlined in the Business and Marketing plan indicating % of increase in sales and expansion into additional markets.",,,12000,"Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas (JCRC) with funding from Otto Bremer Foundation",160874,21294,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",2.20,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The award-winning History Live! program served more than 5,500 students in FY15, bringing the total number of students served since the program launched in FY11 to nearly 29,000. For the first quarter of FY16, the History Live! program updated its business plan with a goal to increase overall revenue and serve more students. It provided 14 programs serving 421 students through Oct. 31, 2015. In addition, the program partnered with the Jewish Community Relations Council to launch a new History Live! lesson that integrates students' use of handheld technology with the live program. Within MNHS, the History Live! program worked with the K-12 programs and services team to develop six new webinars for teachers across the state. In FY16, 20 live and recorded webinars are scheduled to be offered to teachers to support professional development.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/history-live-interactive-video-conferencing-0,,,,
34065,"HVAC Evaluation",2016,8400,,,"Available upon request. Contact grants@mnhs.org","The study and recommendations are pleasantly more detailed then I had anticipated.",,,"Available upon request. Contact grants@mnhs.org",8400,,"Robert Engberg, Pete Peterson, Seth Wellnitz, Mike Faurie, Matt Anderson, Colleen Hendershot Dejong, Barb Wazelle.",0.00,"Kanabec County Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To hire a qualified and experienced HVAC engineer to evaluate the current system in preparation for better control of the Kanabec County Historical Society museum environment.",,,2015-12-01,2016-12-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Wendy,Quinn,"Kanabec County Historical Society","805 Forest Ave W",Mora,MN,55051,763-742-6562,executive.director@kanabechistory.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hvac-evaluation-6,,,,0
3225,"Information Technology",2024,400000,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2023,150000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2022,400000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2021,305000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2020,305000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","FY20 Proposed Activities -Update the Project Proposal & Prioritization database & application based on new requirements in FY19. This is used by staff to propose projects & route them through regional & central office reviews. -Complete the development & deployment of the Public Water Access Operations Application a suite of desktop/mobile applications that support condition assessments generate work orders & accomplishment reporting for Water Access Site operations. This will enable field staff to incorporate daily work information so management has the tools to analyze information & measure outcomes. -Migrate trails & roads information & capture business requirements for the creation of the user interface. Migrate geospatial components into the new structure & gather business requirements & work flows to develop an interface for spatial data collection mapping & attribution. -Gather business requirements for the Parks & Trails utilities & infrastructure database. Gather the needed business requirements to provide a means for State Parks SRAs State Waysides & State Forest Campground facilities to collect data on utility line placement & overall infrastructure maintained at each site. -Enhance existing interface for State Parks SRAs State Waysides & State Forest Campground facility data. Enhance the existing data interface to enable improved user/administrative interaction. -Continue to leverage authoritative data from EIS for web content & reports. Collect business requirements & enhance the EIS to provide immediate access for frequently needed info & produce established annual reports. -Improve security & safety for staff & visitors to state parks by installing video security cameras at locations throughout MN. -Improve the security of Point of Sale transactions using credit cards by meeting Purchasing Card Industry standards for compliance. This includes network configuration changes & the addition of single purpose POS stations. ",,,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2019,420000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","FY19 Proposed Activities - Design and development of the Public Water Access Operations Application – Develop desktop and mobile applications and tools to support condition assessments generate work orders and accomplishment reporting for Water Access Site operations. This will enable field staff to incorporate daily work information so that management has the tools to analyze information and measure outcomes to assess future workloads and budgets. - Migrate trails and roads information and capture business requirements for the creation of the user interface – Migrate geospatial components of roads and trails data into the new structure and gather business requirements and work flows to develop an interface for spatial data collection mapping and attribution. This will allow field staff to actively manage road and trail data with a consistent integrated approach. - Gather business requirements for the Parks and Trails utilities and infrastructure database – Gather the needed business requirements to provide a means for State Parks State Recreation Areas State Waysides and State Forest Campground facilities to collect data on utility line placement and overall infrastructure maintained at each site. The data will enhance knowledge of utilities on site. - Enhance existing interface for State Parks State Recreation Areas State Waysides and State Forest Campground facility data - Enhance the existing data interface to enable improved user and administrative interaction. The enhancements will include functional and efficient tools to enable customized presentation and expedite editing within the application. - Continue to leverage authoritative data from EIS for web content and reports. Collect business requirements and enhance the EIS to provide immediate access for frequently needed information and produce established annual reports.","FY19 Outcomes -Continued to support the Minnesota Great Outdoors application by providing updated DNR Parks and Trails managed park and trail locational and amenity data. -Initiated the design and development of the Public Water Access Operations tool and completed the desktop component of the application and used it to record management activities at Water Access Sites. -Built a mobile tool to facilitate the update of more than 500 photographs of State Park Campsites that are available for review through the State Park Reservation system for citizens when making reservations. -Updated the Point of Interest tool that is used by State park staff to augment cartographic products that are provided to visitors for orientation and wayfinding. -Expanded and built out the Enterprise Information System to include additional feature attributes associated with Water Access Sites that were identified as necessary by the Water Access Site Operations team. -Gather business requirements for an update to the existing Project Proposal and Prioritization system that is used by State Park and Trails staff to document and propose projects that are then routed through Regional and Central Office review and approval. -Installed 49 video security cameras at 12 state park locations statewide improving the safety and security for staff and visitors. Sites include Afton State Park Big Bog Recreation Area Beaver Creek State Park Great River Bluff State Park Interstate State Park Lake Bemidji State Park Lake Bronson State Park Lake Maria State Park Old Mill State Park Red River State Recreation Area William 0’Brien State Park and Zippel Bay State Park. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2018,225803,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","FY18 Proposed Activities - Convert geospatial component of roads and trails data into new structure and develop an interface for spatial data collection mapping and attribution. This will allow field staff to actively manage road and trail data with a consistent integrated approach. - Enhance existing interface for State Parks State Recreation Areas State Waysides and State Forest Campground facility data to enable improved user and administrative access. The enhancements will enable customized presentation and editing within the application. - Elicit and analyze requirements and develop desktop and mobile application tools to support condition assessments generate work orders and accomplishment reporting for Water Access Site operations. This will enable field staff to incorporate updated information management tools into daily work. - Continue to leverage authoritative data from EIS for web content and reports. Collect business requirements and enhance the EIS to provide immediate access for frequently needed information and produce established annual reports. ","FY18 Outcomes - Develop the data migration process and the improvement of trail and road information - The improvement of trails and roads data along with the continued migration of the data into a new structure will assist in the development of an interface for data collection validation and archiving spatial and attribute information. This will allow field staff to actively manage road and trail data with a consistent integrated approach. - Captured business requirements and work flows analysis for the Public Water Access Operations Application – Information gathering for desktop and mobile applications and tools to support condition assessments generate work orders and accomplishment reporting for Water Access Site operations. This will enable field staff to incorporate daily work information so that management has the tools to analyze information and measure outcomes to assess future workloads and budgets. - Supported development of the Minnesota Great Outdoors Application – Provide information to support the web application to assist the public to search for parks trails and outdoor recreation opportunities near-by. Multiple agencies collaborated on the site's design and development. - Development and collection of historical features throughout Parks and Trails – Development of the data structure and tools to collect historical features found on Parks and Trails lands. This will help staff to know where these sites of historical significance exist in the event of natural disaster site development or further historical research. - Development and creation of a web application for the validation of water buffers – The development and creation of a water buffer application used in validating the criteria of water buffer law as it pertains to state owned lands. This will assist in pinpointing problem areas of erosion and remedial plans needed to correct the issue.",,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2017,180000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","FY17 Proposed Activities -Complete design of geospatial component of trails data and develop an interface for spatial data collection mapping and attribution. This will allow field staff to actively manage trail data. -Enhance existing interface for State Parks State Recreation Areas State Waysides and State Forest Campground facility data including locations and pictures of campsites. -Develop interfaces for data maintenance and reporting of State and Local Water Access Sites. -Continue to leverage authoritative data from EIS for web content and reports. ","FY17 Outcomes - Enterprise Information System - Develop data interfaces for maintenance and reporting of State Water Access Sites – A data maintenance interface was completed for State Public Water Access Sites; DNR Parks and Trails staff have access to maintain authoritative data about the facilities present at these management units. Additional functionality was added to support the addition of new facilities and the removal/retirement of facilities that no longer exist. - Develop authoritative content for data-driven web content and pages (ParkFinder Calendar of Events Parks’ individual pages) – DNR’s web content managers continue to integrated several components of the EIS information to feed web pages. Derived products in GIS format continue to be maintained as changes to the Parks and Trails asset inventory changes These data have also been published to the State Geospatial data portal. - Establish a framework to operationalize authoritative data – A framework to publish data content from EIS has been created and is being expanded as more data enters the system. - Captured over 17 000 pictures of campsites at State Parks across the state including 80% of campsites and integrated into Parks online Reservation System. FY17 outcomes - other IT related: - Placement of new security camera systems or the upgrade of current security systems at twenty three State Parks for increased safety and security. - Upgraded internet connections new WIFI and office upgrades at thirty five State Parks. - Completed the courtesy phone project in May of 2017 for the public to access reservation system and be available for safety. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2016,320000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program plans to achieve the following outcomes during FY16: - Complete design and definitions for Trail data; - Develop interfaces to data for maintenance and reporting of State Park State Recreation Areas State Waysides and State Forest Campgrounds facility information; - Develop output for data-driven web content and pages (ParkFinder Calendar of Events Parks’ individual pages); - Establish a framework to operationalize authoritative data. ","-Complete design and definitions for trail data – data tables attributes and content has been defined for DNR administered trails and were developed with subject matter experts and technical staff. -Develop interfaces to data for maintenance and r",,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2015,223000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program area will increase the reliability of Parks and Trails data and information utilized for planning operations on the web and on maps and for other public information. Currently in phase 3 of the project plan Build and populate repository database and beginning stages of Phase 4 Designing and Building User Interfaces.","This program achieved the following outcomes during FY15: -Clearly defined divisional authoritative data for State Water Access Sites State Parks State Recreation Areas State Waysides and Facilities managed by the Division of Parks and Trails; - Designed data structure built structure and populated database for State Parks State Recreation Areas State Waysides and State Forest Campground Facilities; - Documented procedures for migrating data; - Documented procedures and processes for maintenance of data; - Built data maintenance interface (State Water Access Sites). ",,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2014,230000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program area will provide for increased reliability of Parks and Trails data utilized in maps on the web and for other public information. Four phases of development: 1. Inventory and Analysis; 2. Design and Data Preparation; 3. Build and populate a repository database; and 4. Enhance the repository database with user interfaces. ","A systematic approach has been taken to identify and correct redundant and inconsistent data maintained and reported by the Division of Parks and Trails in preparation for managing the information in a division-wide repository of authoritative data.",,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2013,210000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2012,210000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2011,300000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2 (1)",,"This program area will provide for increased business processes and reporting through the use of single source authoritative data. This will create more reliable public information. Four phases of development: 1. Inventory and Analysis; 2. Design and Data Preparation; 3. Build and populate a repository database; and 4. Enhance the repository database with user interfaces. This is a multi-year program target through December of 2013.","The a process has been established with Content Authorities to confirm divisional authoritative data. The identification of the data will be ongoing. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
3225,"Information Technology",2010,280000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2 (1)",,"Establish a plan to manage data centrally will eliminate redundant and outdated information.",,,,,,,,,,,"This program will develop a centralized, integrated approach to managing existing data systems and incorporating new information needs into the integrated enterprise information system of data. ","MNDNR divisions of Parks and Recreation and Trails and Waterways were merged to form the Division of Parks and Trails in December, 2008. At the time, data management practices in the two former divisions were unique, but there was significant overlap in content and needs. Unique and independent data management practices resulted in duplicate datasets being developed and managed by different individuals or groups leading to a high likelihood of inconsistent and outdated information being distributed and reported by the new division of Parks and Trails. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,,,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/information-technology,,,,
34096,"Inspiring Beauty: 50 Years of Ebony Fashion Fair",2016,26144,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","37,303 people visited Inspiring Beauty, 9% of whom were African American -- a nearly fivefold increase. The Net Promoter Score was +71 over a goal of +50 or higher. 91% of visitors rated the History Center ""Excellent"" or ""Very Good"" during the run of Inspiring Beauty.",,,,,26144,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","This exhibit, on view May 23-Aug. 16, 2015, featured the Ebony Fashion Fair traveling fashion show that began in 1958. Over the next 50 years the fashion fair blossomed into an African American institution that raised millions for charity and helped the Johnson Publishing Company",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/inspiring-beauty-50-years-ebony-fashion-fair,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2024,2010424,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division anticipates managing invasive plant species on approximately 11,800 acres.  Previous 5 years average 11,852 acres/yr. ",,,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2023,1146731," M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","The division anticipates managing invasive species on approximately 11,860 acres. ","The division conducted efforts to manage invasive plant species on approximately 11,958 acres. ",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2022,1233959,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","The division anticipates managing invasive species on approximately 13 600 acres. ","The division conducted efforts to manage invasive plant species on approximately 11,860 acres. ",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2021,1006732,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","The division anticipates managing invasive species on approximately 11 400 acres.","11 411 acres managed for invasive species.",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2020,967993,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","In 2020 the division will manage approximately 11 000 acres for invasive species. Acreage is decreasing in part due to successful control efforts.","The division managed approximately 11 873 acres of invasive species. This figure includes work resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy General Fund etc.). Acreage is decreasing in part due to successful control efforts.",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2019,886996,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In 2019 the division will manage approximately 11 000 acres for invasive species. Acreage is decreasing in part due to successful control efforts.","The division has managed approximately 12 160 acres of invasive species as of January 2019. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy ENRTF/LCCMR etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years.",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2018,1047050,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In 2018 the division will manage approximately 14 000 acres for invasive species. Acreage is decreasing in part due to successful control efforts.","The division has managed approximately 12 886 acres of invasive species as of January 2018. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy ENRTF/LCCMR etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years.",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2017,274364,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division will manage approximately 16 000 acres for invasive species. ","The division has managed approximately 20 140 acres of invasive species as of January 2017. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy ENRTF/LCCMR etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years.",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2016,675000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division will manage approximately 11 600 acres for invasive species. ","The division has managed approximately 14 364 acres of invasive species as of January 2016. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy Bonding etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years. ",,,,675000,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2015,539510,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division will manage approximately 15 000 acres for invasive species.","The division has managed approximately 15 153 acres of invasive species as of January 2015. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy Bonding etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years. ",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2014,476600,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division will manage approximately 15 000 acres for invasive species.","The division has managed approximately 15 636 acres of invasive species as of January 2014. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy Bonding etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years.",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2013,472773,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2012,472773,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","MNDNR Parks and Trails has generally controlled invasives on about 8 000 acres per biennium. the biennial target is 21 000 acres.","MNDNR Parks and Trails controlled invasives on 23 702 acres during this biennium. This represents 113% of the target. Final FY12-FY13 totals will be available at the end of the 2013 calendar year when field staff provide statewide accomplishment reports however the target has already been exceeded.",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2011,500000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2 (2)",,,,,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
3219,"Invasive Species Detection, Prevention, and Control on Lands Administered by the Division of Parks and Trails",2010,700000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2 (2)",,"MNDNR Parks and Trails has generally controlled invasives on about 12 168 acres per biennium so the division's target for FY2010-2011 including the additional 4 000 acres is 16 168 acres.","The division exceeded its target (16 168 acres) by approximately 25% (20 133 total acres). While this is great progress many acres of state park land remain infested with non-native plants.",,,,,,,,,,"This on-going program is for detecting, mapping and controlling invasive plant species and re-establishing native vegetation in their place on lands administered by the Division of Parks and Trails. Control of invasive plant species furthers progress to preserve and restore the quality of native plant communities on Parks and Trails lands as well as helps prevent the spread of invasives to new locations. ","Invasive species are considered the second most significant threat to protection of biodiversity in the United States, affecting about half of all rare species. MNDNR has also identified invasive species as one of the greatest land and water challenges facing the state. PAT invasive species control efforts are largely focused on aggressive exotic plant species which are most likely to negatively impact state park lands such as buckthorn, Canada thistle and garlic mustard. Controlling invasive species helps the division to meet its statutory mandate to preserve, perpetuate and interpret natural features that existed in the area of the park prior to European settlement (MS 86A.05). ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/invasive-species-detection-prevention-and-control-lands-administered-division-parks-and,,,,
33301,"Kids Voting St. Paul (now Minnesota Civic Youth)",2016,49000,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$150,000 each year is for grants to the Minnesota Civic Education Coalition: Kids Voting St. Paul, the Learning Law and Democracy Foundation, and YMCA Youth in Government to conduct civics education programs for the civic and cultural development of Minnesota youth. Civics education is the study of constitutional principles and the democratic foundation of our national, state, and local institutions and the study of political processes and structures of government, grounded in the under-standing of constitutional government under the rule of law. ","1. For Kids Voting Minnesota, we will increase by at least 10% the number of students casting a ballot on Election Day. In 2014, 45,000 students from 50 communities cast a ballot. 2. For Governing Youth, we will have 12 students complete the year-long program. 3. For Teens Speak Out, we will work with three different groups to complete a full project cycle. ","1. More than doubled the number of K-12 students who participated in a Kids Voting election this fall. More than 115,000 Minnesota students participated in more than 75 school districts. 2. Minnesota Civic Youth developed a comprehensive website for educators. We worked with educators to solicit their ideas and desires for a website resource, then worked with them to create several new features, including a teaching framework for this specific election. You can find the website at www.mncivicyouth.org/educators 3. For Youth on Boards, cohort of 11 high school students from four different Ramsey County high schools has met more than a dozen times as a group lead by our cohort facilitator. ",,,,49000,,"Julie Rogers Bascom, Rebecca Biel, Carrie Dobie, Judy Farmer, Mason Fong, Eldon Kaul, Kevin Robinson, Shakita Thomas.",1,"Minnesota Civic Youth (Formerly Kids Voting St. Paul)","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Minnesota Civic Youth is dedicated to helping kids and young adults develop the knowledge, skills, confidence and desire to be informed, active citizens. We do this by engaging them in authentic civic experiences and activities that respect their viewpoint and celebrate their voice. We have three primary program areas: Kids Voting Minnesota Network, Governing Youth and Teens Speak Out.     ",,,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Amy,Anderson,"Minnesota Civic Youth ","2395 University Avenue W., #220","St Paul",MN,55114,"(651) 955-1679",amy@mncivicyouth.org,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/kids-voting-st-paul-now-minnesota-civic-youth,,,,
33301,"Kids Voting St. Paul (now Minnesota Civic Youth)",2017,53998,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$150,000 each year is for grants to the Minnesota Civic Education Coalition: Kids Voting St. Paul, the Learning Law and Democracy Foundation, and YMCA Youth in Government to conduct civics education programs for the civic and cultural development of Minnesota youth. Civics education is the study of constitutional principles and the democratic foundation of our national, state, and local institutions and the study of political processes and structures of government, grounded in the under-standing of constitutional government under the rule of law. ","• We will create a conversation model that allows students to effectively discuss difficult topics and come away with greater listening skills and more empathy for the conversation participants • We will pilot the model in 10 sites and evaluate its effectiveness • We will engage at least 100 attorneys to give civic-based presentations in classrooms • We will engage at least 400 student election judges • We will increase the number of Kids Voting sites for the 2018 Gubernatorial Election by at least 25% (from 70 to 85) • We will create the tools necessary to collaborate with local civic partners to promote the value and impact of a strong civic education ","In partnership with the Minnesota Council of Churches and the University of Minnesota, we created a conversation model -- called Respectful Conversations in Schools -- that allows students to effectively discuss difficult topics and comes away with greater listening skills, more empathy and a deeper understanding of the viewpoints of others. We trained 24 teachers in a three-hour workshop in November 2017 to understand and apply the model, then piloted the model in eight MN school districts: Chaska, Deer River, Duluth, Edina, Elk River, Hopkins, Mahtomedi and St. Paul. One of the sites, Edina, created a video to show the impact the model was having with their students. The video can be found at this link: https://vimeo.com/258882827/ad1b629e07. We have been recruiting both school districts and civic speakers for the 2018 election. We are on track to increase the number of Kids Voting sites by 25% as well as to support at least 100 civic leaders (attorneys, veterans, elected and appointed officials) to lead lessons in Minnesota classrooms this fall. We have created a cohort of cities interested in significantly expanding their student election judge program. In addition to Minneapolis and St. Paul, we are working with the city election offices in Minnetonka and St. Louis Park. Our new goal is to have at least 1,000 student election judges in place for the 2018 election! ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Civic Youth (Formerly Kids Voting St. Paul)","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Minnesota Civic Youth is dedicated to helping kids and young adults develop the knowledge, skills, confidence and desire to be informed, active citizens. We do this by engaging them in authentic civic experiences and activities that respect their viewpoint and celebrate their voice. We have three primary program areas: Kids Voting Minnesota Network, Governing Youth and Teens Speak Out.     ",,,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Amy,Anderson,"Minnesota Civic Youth ","2395 University Avenue W., #220","St Paul",MN,55114,"(651) 955-1679",amy@mncivicyouth.org,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/kids-voting-st-paul-now-minnesota-civic-youth,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2025,1450000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(b)","$1,450,000 the first year and $1,450,000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","In FY25 DNR staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. FIBI surveys representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes in nearshore and deep-water zones. DNR will also complete approximately 20 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities and approximately 100 coldwater, oxygenated habitat surveys to evaluate habitat availability for coldwater fishes. The survey data will be used to determine whether the lakes meet biological standards, to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. Survey data will be used in watershed assessments for about 101 lakes in three major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. Approximately six watershed stressor identification reports will be completed and submitted to MPCA for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. DNR will continue working with MPCA and other partners towards the implementation of new standards to protect coldwater fish habitat and exceptionally diverse and healthy fish communities. DNR will also continue work to expand the geographic scope of FIBI monitoring and assessment to include lakes in far northeastern Minnesota by increasing sampling in northeastern MN lakes and developing new models for the unique fish communities. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports will be updated annually on the DNR, MPCA, and Minnesota Water Research Digital Library websites, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI and habitat data will be used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2024,1450000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(b)","$1,450,000 the first year and $1,450,000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. "," In FY24 DNR staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. FIBI surveys representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. DNR will also complete approximately 40 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities and approximately 50 coldwater, oxygenated habitat surveys to evaluate habitat availability for coldwater fishes. The survey data will be used to determine whether the lakes meet biological standards, to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. Survey data will be used in watershed assessments for about 84 lakes in six major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. Approximately six watershed stressor identification reports will be completed and submitted to MPCA for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. DNR will continue working with MPCA and other partners towards the implementation of new standards to protect coldwater fish habitat and exceptionally diverse and healthy fish communities. This will include responding to public comments on proposed standards and completing a biomonitoring program review in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency. DNR will also continue work to expand the geographic scope of FIBI monitoring and assessment to include lakes in far northeastern Minnesota (including lakes within the Lake Superior and Rainy Lake Basins). FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports will be updated annually on the DNR and MPCA websites, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data will be used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ","In FY24 Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff completed 136 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 217 habitat surveys (18 shoreline habitat and 199 oxythermal habitat). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame, in nearshore and deep-water zones. Shoreline habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. Oxythermal surveys measure available cold, oxygenated water for coldwater fishes. FIBI survey information was used by MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for 77 lake assessments in six major watersheds throughout Minnesota. Assessments determine biological condition for identifying lakes considered as impaired, lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and lakes of exceptional biological quality. DNR published watershed stressor identification reports for lakes in three watersheds. In collaboration with MPCA, DNR drafted new biological and water quality standards and supporting documents outlining the science behind the new standards. The new standards will protect coldwater fishes and their habitat, and lakes with exceptionally healthy and diverse fish communities. DNR expanded FIBI program work to the far northeastern part of the state, completing over 163 surveys in the Lake Superior North and Rainy River Headwater Watersheds; these lakes will be assessed with new standards to protect coldwater lakes in the next two years. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports are available on the DNR website, MPCA website, Minnesota Water Research Digital Library website, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI and coldwater fish habitat data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and in Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,1322766,121378,,13.1,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2023,1000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","In FY23 DNR staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. FIBI surveys representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. DNR will also complete approximately 40 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities and approximately 15 coldwater, oxygenated habitat surveys to evaluate habitat availability for coldwater fishes. The survey data will be used to determine whether the lakes meet biological standards, to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. Survey data will be used in watershed assessments for about 36 lakes in three major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule (MPCA reduced the number of watersheds due to 2020-2021 Covid related delays). Approximately six watershed stressor identification reports will be submitted to MPCA for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. DNR will continue working with MPCA and other partners towards the implementation of new standards to protect coldwater fish habitat and exceptionally diverse and healthy fish communities. This will include collecting public comments on proposed standards and undertaking a biomonitoring program review in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency. DNR will also begin work to expand the geographic scope of FIBI monitoring and assessment to include lakes in far northeastern Minnesota (including lakes within the Lake Superior and Rainy Lake Basins). FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports will be updated annually on the DNR and MPCA websites, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data will be used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ","In FY23 Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff completed 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 102 habitat surveys (31 shoreline habitat and 71 oxythermal habitat). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities or cold, oxygenated water available for coldwater fishes. FIBI survey information was used by MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for 42 lake assessments in three major watersheds throughout Minnesota. Assessments determine biological condition for identifying lakes considered as impaired, lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and lakes of exceptional biological quality. DNR published watershed stressor identification reports for lakes in four watersheds. DNR drafted new biological and water quality standards and two technical support documents outlining the science behind the new standards in collaboration with MPCA. The new standards will protect coldwater fishes and their habitat and lakes with exceptionally healthy and diverse fish communities. DNR expanded FIBI program work to the far northeastern part of the state, completing over 30 surveys in the Lake Superior North Watershed. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports are available on the DNR website, MPCA website, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and in Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,1023084,76759,,11.8,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2022,1000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","Fish: In FY22 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 120 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 30 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. FIBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 109 lakes in two major watersheds following MPCA's watershed schedule including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We will publish stressor identification reports for lakes in approximately six watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. FIBI data will be used for prioritization of protection and restoration projects in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Watershed Plans. We will work towards implementation of new standards to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. In FY22 DNR Ecological and Water Resources (EWR) staff will shift their work focus to directly support the Fish IBI surveys. Most aquatic plant IBI surveys will be discontinued. This change is being made to address budget reductions and shifting priorities. EWR staff will help conduct fish surveys as well as floating and emergent plant surveys and shoreline habitat surveys. ","Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff completed 137 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 61 habitat surveys. FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities or cold, oxygenated water available for coldwater fishes. FIBI survey information was used by MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for 113 lake assessments in two major watersheds including 39 lakes within the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area. Assessments determine biological condition for identifying lakes considered as impaired, lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and lakes of exceptional biological quality. DNR delivered watershed stressor identification reports for lakes in five watersheds to MPCA for publication. DNR drafted new biological and water quality standards and two technical support documents outlining the science behind the new standards in collaboration with MPCA. The new standards will protect coldwater fishes and their habitat and lakes with exceptionally healthy and diverse fish communities. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports are available on the DNR website, MPCA website, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and in Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,994282,75775,,11,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2021,1250000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. The number of IBI sampling assessments in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide sampling assessments must be proportional to the number of IBI-suitable lakes in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide IBI-suitable lakes. ","Fish: In FY21 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 100 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 50 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. FIBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 106 lakes in six major watersheds following MPCA's watershed schedule including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We will publish stressor identification reports for approximately four watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. FIBI data will be used for prioritization of protection and restoration projects in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will finalize standards and supporting science to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. In FY21 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA for lakes the MPCA will assess in 2021 or 2022. We will survey various lake plant communities across the state including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods. We will continue providing training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect and contribute aquatic plant data. We will also be working on data review and model development for a nearshore aquatic plant IBI. ","Fish: DNR staff completed 117 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 75 shoreline habitat surveys (survey work was reduced due to COVID-19 related staffing and fieldwork limitations). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample game and nongame fish communities in nearshore and deep-water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. FIBI survey information was used by MPCA for 106 lake assessments in six major watersheds including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. Assessments determined biological condition identified impaired lakes lakes vulnerable to future impairment and lakes of exceptional biological quality. We published stressor identification reports for lakes in six watersheds. We drafted standards and technical support documents to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Watershed Plans.   Aquatic Plants: DNR biologists analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to assist with the stressor identification process for lakes that are impaired for biology. Due to COVID-19 restrictions DNR biologists focused efforts on shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands. We completed 13 near-shore plant surveys seven floating and emergent plant surveys and one point-intercept plant survey. These data are used for evaluating shoreland development as a lake stressor. Also because accurate plant identification is essential for these assessments we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that contribute aquatic plant data used to inform the aquatic plant IBI. As COVID-19 related policies prevented in person training sessions we developed web-based modules to facilitate training. ",,,,991375,104796,,8.7,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2020,1250000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. The number of IBI sampling assessments in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide sampling assessments must be proportional to the number of IBI-suitable lakes in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide IBI-suitable lakes. ","In FY20 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 140 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 75 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. FIBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 55 lakes in four major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will publish stressor identification reports for approximately four watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. We will draft standards and supporting science to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. In FY19 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA for lakes scheduled for assessment in 2020 or 2021. Statewide we will survey a variety of lake plant communities including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods and we will continue to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant data. ","Fish: DNR staff completed 72 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 64 shoreline habitat surveys (survey work was reduced due to COVID-19 related fieldwork limitations and a budget cut). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample game and nongame fish communities in nearshore and deep water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. FIBI survey information was used by MPCA for 46 lake assessments in four major watersheds including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. Assessments determined biological condition identified impaired lakes lakes vulnerable to future impairment and lakes of exceptional biological quality. We published stressor identification reports for three watersheds. We worked with MPCA to draft standards and supporting science to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies.   Aquatic Plants: DNR biologists analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine whether lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists conducted surveys at 30 priority lakes to collect the data needed for plant IBI analysis and development. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop plant IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Since accurate plant identification is essential for plant IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that contribute aquatic plant data used to inform the aquatic plant IBI. Because COVID-19 related policies prevented our ability to hold in person training sessions we developed web based training modules to facilitate training opportunities. ",,,,1246102,98444,,15.5,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2019,1250000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments.","Fish: In FY19 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys in lakes. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 75 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. Fish IBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 78 lakes in six major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection. We will produce stressor identification reports for approximately three watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. We will continue to refine fish IBI tools and develop metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY19 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA for lakes the MPCA will assess in 2019 or 2020. Statewide we will survey various lake plant communities including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods. We will continue providing training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect and contribute aquatic plant data.","In FY19 DNR Fisheries staff completed 144 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys on lakes. FIBI surveys sample game and nongame fish communities in nearshore and deep water zones. We conducted 110 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. The MPCA used the FIBI information in watershed assessments for 80 lakes in six major watersheds bringing the total to over 450 lakes assessed. The information was used to determine if the lakes meet standards to identify lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We published stressor identification reports for two additional watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. Finally we continued refining FIBI tools with a focus on developing standards to protect lakes that support cold-water habitat and exceptional fish communities. In FY19 DNR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine—together with information from the fish IBI surveys described above—whether the lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists conducted detailed field surveys at 57 priority lakes that lacked the data needed for plant IBI analysis and development. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop plant IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Since accurate plant identification is essential for plant IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs which has led to the combined sampling of 156 total lakes that will be used for IBI analysis and development.",,,,1335951,100677,,17.5,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2018,1250000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments.","Fish: In FY18 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys including near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish in shallow and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 75 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. Fish IBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 160 lakes in four major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet water quality standards identify and analyze lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS). We will produce stressor ID reports for three watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on Fish IBI scores. We will continue to refine Fish IBI tools and develop metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY18 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA. We will conduct field surveys on about 50 lakes in the North Fork Crow River Snake River and Sauk River watersheds which are scheduled to be assessed by the MPCA in 2019 or 2020. Statewide we will survey a variety of lake plant communities including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods. Finally because accurate plant identification is essential for IBI surveys we will continue to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant data.","Fish: In FY18 DNR biologists completed 160 fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys in lakes. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We also conducted 109 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. The MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) used the resulting information to assess 189 lakes in four major watersheds–specifically to determine whether the lakes meet water quality standards to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection. We produced stressor identification reports for three watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on last year’s fish IBI results. Finally we continued refining fish IBI tools and developing metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY18 DNR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine—together with fish IBI information—whether the lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists conducted detailed surveys at 75 priority lakes to collect the data needed for plant IBI analysis and development. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop plant IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Since accurate plant identification is essential for plant IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that contribute aquatic plant data.",,,,1251130,93268,,16.6,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2017,1300000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","(b) $1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments.","Fish: In FY17 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. About 75 shoreline habitat surveys will be conducted for stressor ID purposes. Fish IBI survey information will be used as part of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)’s watershed assessments for approximately 56 lakes in three major watersheds. Based on the Fish IBI lakes will be designated as impaired or meeting standards. In addition the list of lakes of exceptional biological quality will be updated to help identify which lakes are priorities for protection in the development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will produce stressor ID reports for six watersheds; for about 25 lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on their Fish IBI score. Aquatic Plants: In FY17 EWR biologists will organize analyze and deliver aquatic plant data which the MPCA will use to determine whether lakes are meeting water quality standards. We will continue to provide training and technical support to staff in other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant data and survey shoreline habitat. We will focus plant surveys on lakes Mississippi River-Brainerd Mississippi River – Grand Rapids Ottertail River and Kettle River watersheds. We will conduct intensive detailed field surveys at 20 priority lakes where there are not enough data to do a quality IBI assessment and we will survey shoreline habitat and delineate emergent plant stands on about 50 lakes. This will help us develop additional IBI metrics for non-nutrient stressors.","Fish: In FY17 DNR staff completed 157 Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys of fish. The surveys include near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish in shallow and deep water zones. Staff also conducted 112 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreland activities on fish community metrics. The MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) used the resulting information in watershed assessments for 54 lakes in three major watersheds. The information was used to determine whether the lakes meet water quality standards identify and analyze lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS). DNR staff produced stressor identification reports for six watersheds in which 28 lakes were designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on Fish IBI score. Finally DNR staff continued refining Fish IBI tools and developing metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY17 DNR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine – together with information from the Fish IBI surveys described above—whether the lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists focused on lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd Mississippi River-Sartell Otter Tail River and Kettle River watersheds conducting detailed field surveys at 50 priority lakes that lacked the data needed for IBI analysis. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Finally because accurate plant identification is essential for IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR ",,,,1174294,97900,,15.5,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2016,1300000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","Fish IBI: In FY16 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish index of biological integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. IBI survey information will be used as part of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)’s watershed assessments for approximately 65 lakes in six major watersheds. Lakes will be identified as impaired or as meeting standards based on the fish IBI. In addition the list of lakes of exceptional biological quality will be updated to help identify which lakes are priorities for protection in the development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will continue to produce stressor ID reports; for lakes with poor fish IBI scores; approximately 30 – 40 lakes are likely to be designated as impaired. Aquatic Plant IBI: In FY16 EWR biologists will organize analyze and deliver aquatic plant data which the MPCA will use to determine whether lakes are meeting water quality standards. We will continue to provide training and technical support to staff in other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant and data and do shoreline habitat surveys. We will target intensive detailed field surveys at 13 priority lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd watershed where there is not enough data to do a quality IBI assessment and we will survey shoreline habitat and delineate emergent plant stands on 47 lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd watershed. This will help us develop additional IBI metrics for non-nutrient stressors. ","Fish: In FY16 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. About 75 shoreline habitat surveys will be conducted for stressor ID purposes. Fish IBI survey information will be used as part of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)’s watershed assessments for approximately 56 lakes in three major watersheds. Based on the Fish IBI lakes will be designated as impaired or meeting standards. In addition the list of lakes of exceptional biological quality will be updated to help identify which lakes are priorities for protection in the development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will produce stressor ID reports for six watersheds; for about 25 lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on their Fish IBI score. Aquatic Plants: In FY16 EWR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data which the MPCA used to determine whether lakes are meeting water quality standards. We provided training and technical support to staff in other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant and data and do shoreline habitat surveys. Specifically we trained 51 DNR Fisheries staff in shoreline habitat survey methods and 50 EWR and Fisheries staff in aquatic plant identification. We targeted intensive detailed field surveys at 13 priority lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd North Fork Crow River Crow Wing River and Sauk River watersheds where there were not enough data to do a quality IBI assessment. We surveyed shoreline habitat on 47 lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd Mississippi River-Grand Rapids and Ottertail River watersheds and delineated emergent plant stands on 47 lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd watershed. These data will help us develop additional IBI metrics for non-nutrient stressors.",,,,1165962,155377,,16.7,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2015,1300000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","Fish IBI: In FY15 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish IBI surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. IBI survey information will be used as part of MPCA’s watershed assessments. Using the data collected to date DNR Biologists will work with MPCA to finalize a fish IBI tool for most lake types and develop a Biological Condition Gradient (BCG) Model for Minnesota lakes. We expect to finalize the fish-based IBI and BCG models for most lake types by early 2015. Aquatic Plant IBI: In FY15 DNR biologists will analyze quantitative data collected by DNR Fisheries DNR Wildlife Shallow Lakes Program and DNR EWR's Lakes & Rivers Program as a next step in finalizing an aquatic plant IBI. We will organize analyze and deliver aquatic plant data collected in targeted watersheds for use in MPCA’s watershed assessment process for identifying impaired waters. A manual of standardized aquatic plant survey methods will be completed.","Fish IBI: In FY15 DNR biologists completed 136 fish index of biological integrity (IBI) surveys which included near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. We also finalized four fish IBI tools and established biological impairment thresholds for the fish IBIs. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) used fish IBI survey information in their watershed assessments for 81 lakes in four major watersheds. Based on the fish IBI lakes were determined to be impaired or meeting standards. We also made a list of lakes of exceptional biological quality which is being used to identify protection priorities in MPCA’s Watershed Restorations and Protection Strategies. We took on a new task of determining which factors are contributing to fish IBI impairments on lakes; we drafted 9 stressor ID reports for the MPCA. Aquatic Plant IBI: In FY15 EWR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data on 152 lakes in priority watersheds. A variety of DNR programs collect lake plant data; we used these data for the plant IBI assessments. To help maintain this important data source we finalized survey protocols for aquatic plant IBI assessments wrote a manual of these standardized survey methods and held training workshops for 150 DNR Fish and Wildlife staff involved in lake plant surveys. In addition we did more detailed in-lake surveys on eight priority lakes in the Rum River Watershed where there was not enough existing plant data to calculate an IBI. Biologists surveyed shoreline habitat and/or delineated emergent plant stands on 25 lakes in the Rum River and Mississippi River-Brainerd watersheds We also made progress enhancing software to gather and manage data which will make it easier for more biologists from other DNR programs to survey shoreline habitat and/or delineate emergent plant stands.",,,,956280,96351,,14.1,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2014,1300000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","In FY14 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in the shallow and deep water zones. IBI survey information will be used as part of MPCA’s watershed assessments. Using the data collected to date DNR Biologists will work with MPCA to finalize a fish IBI tool for most lake types and develop a Biological Condition Gradient (BCG) model for Minnesota lakes. We expect to finalize the IBI and BCG models by early 2015. Biologists will also begin work on developing IBI tools for aquatic plants in FY14.","In FY14 DNR biologists completed 124 fish IBI surveys on 121 lakes which include near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish surveys in the shallow and deep water zones. Biologists also developed tools for incorporating fish IBI information into the watershed assessment process in coordination with MPCA. FY14 (primarily summer of 2013) was the first year of transitioning from sampling for tool development to sampling primarily as part of a watershed assessment within the MNPCA schedule. Due to the logistics of working in selected watersheds vs. statewide fewer lakes were sampled. We also increased survey effort on many lakes targeted larger lakes which take more time to sample and added new gear targeting sensitive pelagic fish species on several lakes. In FY14 DNR biologists developed and conducted special IBI vegetation surveys on approximately 20 lakes throughout the state. These surveys were targeted for data collection in the shoreline and near-shore zones where data are currently lacking. Surveys included rapid shoreline habitat assessments delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant beds and quantitative assessments of in-lake plant communities. A centralized database for these data has been created. ",,,,7574287,142024,,11.08,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2013,1150000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1150000 the first year and $1150000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments including assessment of 400 additional lakes and technical analysis to develop an aquatic plant IBI analysis. The commissioner shall work with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency on the development of an assessment tool.","In FY13 DNR biologists will complete approximately 180 fish IBI surveys on 160 lakes including repeat surveys for quality control. Surveys target the entire fish community including nongame and game fish living in the nearshore area and offshore. IBI survey information will be used as part of PCA’s watershed assessments. Biologists will begin work on developing plant IBI tools.","In FY13 DNR biologists completed 146 fish IBI surveys which include near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish surveys in the shallow and deep water zones. Biologists also developed tools for incorporating fish IBI information into the watershed assessment process in coordination with MPCA. The number of surveys was smaller than originally proposed due to changes in study design to add different methods of fish collection (e.g. vertical gill nets small mesh trap nets electrofishing) and improve efficiency and data quality. An unseasonably cool spring caused water temperatures to be too cool to effectively sample near-shore fish communities.",,,,786648,111048,,13.0,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2012,1150000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1150000 the first year and $1150000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments including assessment of 400 additional lakes and technical analysis to develop an aquatic plant IBI analysis. The commissioner shall work with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency on the development of an assessment tool.","In FY12 DNR biologists will complete 200 fish IBI surveys. Surveys target the entire fish community including nongame and game fish living in the nearshore area and offshore. Twenty lakes will receive multiple nearshore surveys per field season for quality control purposes.","In FY12 DNR biologists completed 180 fish IBI surveys on 162 lakes. Surveys target the entire fish community including nongame and game fish living in the nearshore area and offshore Eighteen lakes received additional surveys for quality control purposes. Biologists also developed tools for incorporating fish IBI information into the watershed assessment process in coordination with MPCA.",,,,972395,126390,,14.0,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2011,1178000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY11 DNR biologists will assess 200 lakes for nearshore fish communities along with accompanying littoral zone and pelagic game and nongame fish surveys. Twenty lakes will receive multiple nearshore surveys per field seaon for quality control purposes.","In FY11 DNR biologists completed 228 nearshore assessments on 204 lakes for nearshore fish communities. Littoral and pelagic game and nongame fish surveys were also completed.",,,,1029929,64573,,18.0,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2010,200000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY10 DNR biologists will assess 60 lakes for nearshore nongame fish populations.","In FY10 DNR biologists assessed 22 lakes for nearshore nongame fish populations. DNR Fisheries management staff were trained to do nearshore nongame fish population assessments in preparation for transition of assessment program from the Division of Ecological and Water Resources to the Division of Fish and Wildlife.",,,,,,,,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
33300,"Learning Law and Democracy Foundation",2016,68600,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$150,000 each year is for grants to the Minnesota Civic Education Coalition: Kids Voting St. Paul, the Learning Law and Democracy Foundation, and YMCA Youth in Government to conduct civics education programs for the civic and cultural development of Minnesota youth. Civics education is the study of constitutional principles and the democratic foundation of our national, state, and local institutions and the study of political processes and structures of government, grounded in the under-standing of constitutional government under the rule of law. ","1. Increased website value through total redesign 2. Increased teacher capacity through professional development Institutes (3-5 days) for 65 teachers, include instruction on redesigned website, new materials 3. Increased teaching options by adding 100 additional lessons, vetted, aligned on the website 4. Increase educators using the website by 50% per year to 6,000 sessions (Minnesota) accessing 18,000 lessons 5. Engage 1,500 students in We the People, Project Citizen Statewide program events and other civic education programs ","1. More than doubled the number of K-12 students who participated in a Kids Voting election this fall. More than 115,000 Minnesota students participated in more than 75 school districts. 2. Minnesota Civic Youth developed a comprehensive website for educators. We worked with educators to solicit their ideas and desires for a website resource, then worked with them to create several new features, including a teaching framework for this specific election. You can find the website at www.mncivicyouth.org/educators 3. For Youth on Boards, cohort of 11 high school students from four different Ramsey County high schools has met more than a dozen times as a group lead by our cohort facilitator. ",,,,68600,,"Debra Berghoff, Treasurer; Dana Carmichael; Eldon G. Kaul; Jeff McGuire; Mary Jo McGuire; Deb Noll, Chair; Rick Theisen, Secretary. ",,"Learning Law and Democracy Foundation","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Learning Law and Democracy will enhance civic education across Minnesota by increasing the value of teachingcivics.org through redesigned architecture and an updated look and feel along with the addition of new lessons and user instructions. Student programs supported with this grant will also experience a redesign to capitalize on the renovated State Capitol and new Senate Building and will benefit from new partners and teachers with increased capacity to teach through professional development. Learning Law and Democracy Foundation: Civic Education for a Strong Democracy – Learning Law and Democracy Foundation's ""Civic Education for a Strong Democracy"" project will increase the quality and reach of LLAD's student civic education programs and enhance the value of the website teachingcivics.org through a redesign that provides engaging tools for students and teachers to facilitate authentic conversation, collects important impact data, and connects educators with new and improved resources. Professional development and community engagement will support this effort. ",,,2015-07-01,2017-03-31,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Jennifer,Bloom,"Learning Law and Democracy Foundation","2395 University Avenue West, Suite 220","St Paul",MN,55114,,jbloom@teachingcivics.org,,"Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/learning-law-and-democracy-foundation,,,,
33300,"Learning Law and Democracy Foundation",2017,58604,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$150,000 each year is for grants to the Minnesota Civic Education Coalition: Kids Voting St. Paul, the Learning Law and Democracy Foundation, and YMCA Youth in Government to conduct civics education programs for the civic and cultural development of Minnesota youth. Civics education is the study of constitutional principles and the democratic foundation of our national, state, and local institutions and the study of political processes and structures of government, grounded in the under-standing of constitutional government under the rule of law. ","1.  Complete the redesign of the teachingcivics.org website, adding student and teacher engagement tools such as polling, forums, conversations, and data collection which will help build stronger civic education efforts throughout the state. 2.  Add 100 lessons to teachingcivics.org and continue to update content and links. 3. Enhance student programs by (a) increasing the number of students and schools participating in grant supported civic education student programs with particular focus on high needs schools; (b) updating programs by integrating technology when appropriate; (c) providing professional development for teachers; (a)promote student programs such as We the People and Project Citizen in communities that currently are not participating on either a local or state level. (b) In some cases, the use of technology to connect students in different communities with statewide events will help expand program participation and will be pursued by using technology already available in communities. (c)Teachers will be supported in their efforts to implement high quality civic education using proven practices through professional development experiences. This programming will be co funded by grants from the Minnesota Department of Education and others (currently the federally funded James Madison Legacy Project). For example, the Legacy grant will provide critical resources to support LLAD's Update Institute which focuses on Minnesota and federal civic knowledge content and current issues. 4. Help partners conduct high quality civic education programs through activities such as professional development support, program design consultation, and stronger civic education partnerships. ","Website: (Proposed outcomes 1 and 2) Website redesign partially completed, . Much of the information architecture is completed, some minor redesign of the search tool needed. Graphic design was not accepted. Engagement tool of polling was added; others were not completed. LLAD is seeking new developer. 786 lessons were reviewed, updated. Users: 3836 Minnesota users accessed lessons 14,556 times. Average number of pages accessed per session went from 2.14 to 2.71 2.29% are new users this past year. We use Google Analytics to measure our outcomes. Student Activities: WTP 78 students (up 39%), 30 teams for the annual We the People State Showcase Dec 12, 2017. In addition, 11 more teachers/schools held simulated hearings in their schools. May 15, 2018 Project Citizen at State Capitol 36 projects, 149 students (31% increase); Three new teachers in St Louis Park are going to have their 9th grade students participate in Project Citizen this coming year, joining Chaska Middle School having all students participate. Professional Development: 208 teachers were supported in their efforts to implement civic education with their students through high quality professional development in civics and government. When possible, these efforts are co funded/co sponsored and vary from one hour to 4 days. ",,,,,,,,"Learning Law and Democracy Foundation","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Learning Law and Democracy will enhance civic education across Minnesota by increasing the value of teachingcivics.org through redesigned architecture and an updated look and feel along with the addition of new lessons and user instructions. Student programs supported with this grant will also experience a redesign to capitalize on the renovated State Capitol and new Senate Building and will benefit from new partners and teachers with increased capacity to teach through professional development. Learning Law and Democracy Foundation: Civic Education for a Strong Democracy – Learning Law and Democracy Foundation's ""Civic Education for a Strong Democracy"" project will increase the quality and reach of LLAD's student civic education programs and enhance the value of the website teachingcivics.org through a redesign that provides engaging tools for students and teachers to facilitate authentic conversation, collects important impact data, and connects educators with new and improved resources. Professional development and community engagement will support this effort. ",,,2015-07-01,2017-03-31,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Jennifer,Bloom,"Learning Law and Democracy Foundation","2395 University Avenue West, Suite 220","St Paul",MN,55114,,jbloom@teachingcivics.org,,"Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/learning-law-and-democracy-foundation,,,,
34074,"Legacy Field Trip Support Fund",2016,110353,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","We measure number of participants (schools & # of students) as our primary measure of success.",,,,,110353,1659,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.20,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Legacy Field Trip Support Fund helped 24,444 Minnesota students in 298 schools experience field trips at Minnesota historic sites and museums statewide in FY15. The high cost of transportation prohibits many Minnesota teachers from taking their students on field trips. The Legacy Field Trip Support Fund offsets transportation costs to all of MNHS's 26 museums and historic sites statewide. Eligible schools (those with 25 percent of more of their students enrolled in the Federal Free and Reduced Lunch Program) are reimbursed $4 per student which, based on teacher feedback, allows more students access to field trips. The program is expected to serve a similar number in FY16.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/legacy-field-trip-support-fund-2,,,,
34080,"Legacy Strategic Agenda (LSA)",2016,50000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","More communities across Minnesota will be engaged in history. Definitions of value, expectations and structure will be determined. Increased number of partnerships with schools and libraries create best practices to be shared across Minnesota. Increase new audiences as partners.",,,,,50000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","LSA is a statewide project that builds on the achievements realized during the first five years of Legacy funding. The LSA is a strategic document and a resource for the work of statewide history communities over the next four years. Through a collaborative statewide process, the LSA has identified four goals and four strategic priorities that ultimately will be measured and sustained. Legacy Vision We are all deeply connected to each other when we are engaged in, enriched by, and excited about Minnesota's history and cultural heritage. Legacy Goals ",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Preservation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/legacy-strategic-agenda-lsa,,,,
34103,"Legacy Exhibit & Program Marketing",2016,56000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Overall 3% annual increase in MNHS attendance. Messaging for Legacy programs shared with public in print, broadcast, outdoor and digital mediums, as will as with the news media statewide",,,,,56000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS launched several new marketing tools that spread the word of exhibitions and related programs supported by Legacy funding. A new MNHS programs and events magazine is reaching more Minnesotans than ever before, and a new partnership with the Star Tribune advertises MNHS programs twice per month next to the paper's new Minnesota history column by Curt Brown. Additional marketing through print, broadcast, outdoor, and online communications have also contributed to impressive gains in attendance and awareness of the Legacy-funded programs and exhibits presented by MNHS. Overall for FY15, attendance at MNHS locations was up 17 percent, with the Minnesota History Center up 11 percent.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/legacy-exhibit-program-marketing,,,,
10004465,"Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR)",2016,1072000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 11a","$1,072,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources for administration in fiscal years 2016 and 2017 as provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 116P.09, subdivision 5.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR)","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_11a.pdf,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund",Completed,,,Susan,Thornton,"Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources","100 Rev Dr Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, 65 State Office Bldg","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 296-6264",susan.thornton@lccmr.leg.mn,,"Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/legislative-citizen-commission-minnesota-resources-lccmr-4,,,,
34108,"Library Outreach Program",2016,49307,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","We will serve 1,000 people by the end of FY16. Based on past evaluations, we anticipate that there will be 90 percent or higher scores by participants to strongly agree/agree on the following outcomes: 1) programs increased their knowledge and understanding of topic; 2) programs increased their personal connection to history; 3) programs increased their interest in learning more about Minnesota's diverse history; 4) programs increased the likelihood that they would have conversations about historical topics; and 5) MNHS was a valuable resource for improving their physical and intellectual wellbeing.",,,,,49307,5264,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.60,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS and regional public libraries across Minnesota are combining resources to educate, entertain, and build community among library patrons in the state. Libraries and MNHS are bringing a range of programs and events to local libraries that document and preserve community stories for future generations, educate people of all ages about the history of Minnesota and its people, and make high quality history programming accessible to all Minnesotans. More than 60 programs were presented in dozens of communities around the state, including: ",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/library-outreach-program,,,,
34082,"Lifelong Learning",2016,98022,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Outcomes: Net Promoter Score goal for FY16 = 69. YTD participants reported that they strongly agreed/agreed with these outcomes: 1) 92 percent increased their knowledge of MN's history and/or cultural traditions 2) 84 percent reported that they were likely to have conversations about historical topics; and 3) 92 percent reported that MNHS was a valuable resource for physical and/or intellectual wellbeing.",,,91408,"IMLS Museums for America",98022,12001,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",1.10,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Minnesota Historical Society is deeply engaged in cultivating meaningful relationships with adult audiences as lifelong learners, members, donors, volunteers, and supporters. In FY16, MNHS continued to build the organization's capacity for using skilled volunteers through staff trainings, creating new programs, and a thorough evaluation of programs targeted at adult audiences. New initiatives: Fifty-eight new skilled volunteer positions were added, contributing 4,700 volunteer hours. Staff piloted a new program in fall 2015 for people with memory loss at Mill City Museum, which includes time spent in the baking lab. In addition, tours for people with memory loss continued at the James J. Hill House. These hour-long programs aim to spark memory and conversation with residents and their caregivers by using the historic resources and storytelling skills of MNHS staff. About 200 people attended the first Writing Your Family Legacy Conference, held in partnership with The Loft Literary Center. Participants learned how to research, write, and preserve their family legacy at this all-day event. Staff work has begun on the Together in Time project, which uses an app to show objects from MNHS's collections to spark conversations for people with memory loss and their caregivers. During FY16, staff will be working with the African American and Latino communities to build relationships and better understand how to serve their unique memory loss and cultural needs. A work group was formed to study what was needed to create and sustain an interactive video conference program that could be screened for adults in assisted living facilities. Pilot programs will be held in spring 2016.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lifelong-learning-0,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2022,563000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$563,000 the first year and $563,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies on a watershed scale for use in local comprehensive water planning efforts, to provide resources to local governments for activities that protect sources of drinking water, and to enhance approaches that improve the capacity of local governmental units to protect and restore groundwater resources. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2021,563000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$563,000 the first year and $563,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies on a watershed scale for use in local comprehensive water planning efforts, to provide resources to local governments for activities that protect sources of drinking water, and to enhance approaches that improve the capacity of local governmental units to protect and restore groundwater resources ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2020,550000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 8","$550,000 the first year and $550,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies on a watershed scale for use in local comprehensive water planning efforts, to provide resources to local governments for activities that protect sources of drinking water, and to enhance approaches that improve the capacity of local governmental units to protect and restore groundwater resources. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2019,200000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities.  ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2018,200000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities.  ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,191000,9000,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2017,125000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$125,000 the first year and $125,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,114400,10600,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2016,125000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$125,000 the first year and $125,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities.","The proposed outcomes of 2015 efforts is to complete two GRAPS pilot projects. The pilot projects will a) engage local governments and other stakeholders to gather input on how GRAPS can most effectively support local implementation of activities that protect and improve groundwater and drinking water (including the type, format, and delivery of information), b) determine resources and time needed to complete a GRAPS process in a watershed, and c) evaluate the effectiveness of GRAPS as a local groundwater and drinking water planning tool on a watershed scale.",,,,,106725,18275,,1.2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2015,300000,"M.L. 2014, Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 6","$300,000 in 2015 from the Clean Water Fund is to collaborate with the Board of Water and Soil Resources and local units of government in the North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area, Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area, and Straight River Groundwater Management Area and to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas, in cooperation with the Board of Water and Soil Resources, to meet the sustainability standards of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 103G, including Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.287, subdivision 5, and to be available for the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 103H. The update should identify the most critical areas that need protecting. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased colloboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,256920,43080,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2024,1523464,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2023,1211340,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","In FY23, Parks and Trails will provide support to central office regional and field operations of seven (7) critical programs (and their component projects) that will advance the Legacy mission to Maintain Existing Holdings/Take Care of What We Have:  1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects;  2. Invasive Species Detection  Prevention and Control;  3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes). ",,,,,,,,16.2,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2022,1035420,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","In FY22 Parks and Trails will provide support to central office regional and field operations of seven (7) critical programs (and their component projects) that will advance the Legacy mission to Maintain Existing Holdings/Take Care of What We Have: 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes). ","In FY22, Parks and Trails provided support to central office regional and field operations of seven (7) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission to Maintain Existing Holdings/Take Care of What We Have:  1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects;  2. Invasive Species Detection  Prevention  and Control;  3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see individual programs for accomplishments). ",,,,,,,16.6,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2021,1255197,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","In FY21 Parks and Trails will provide support to central office regional and field operations of seven (7) critical programs (and their component projects) that will advance the Legacy mission to Maintain Existing Holdings/Take Care of What We Have: 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).",,,,,,,,14,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2020,1146426,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","In FY 20 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of seven critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of 'Maintain Existing Holdings (Take Care of What We Have'): 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).","In FY20 Parks and Trails provided support to central office regional and field operations of seven (7) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission to Maintain Existing Holdings/Take Care of What We Have: 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see individual programs for accomplishments).",,,,,,,15.8,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2019,1417177,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 19 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of seven critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of 'Maintain Existing Holdings (Take Care of What We Have'): 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).","In FY 19 Parks and Trails provided support to central office regional and field operations of seven (7) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of 'Maintain Existing Holdings (Take Care of What We Have'): 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see individual programs for accomplishments).",,,,,,,15.8,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2018,1406456,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 18 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of seven critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of 'Maintain Existing Holdings (Take Care of What We Have'): 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see those programs for a summary of proposed outcomes).","In FY 18 Parks and Trails provided support to central office regional and field operations of seven (7) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of 'Maintain Existing Holdings (Take Care of What We Have'): 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see individual programs for accomplishments).",,,,,,,13.4,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2017,1456863,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 17 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of seven critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of 'Maintain Existing Holdings (Take Care of What We Have'): 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. ","In FY 17 Parks and Trails provided support to central office regional and field operations of seven (7) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of 'Maintain Existing Holdings (Take Care of What We Have'): 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see individual programs for accomplishments).",,,,,,,10.6,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2016,1438933,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 16 Parks and Trails will provide Legacy-funded support to central office regional and field operations of seven critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of 'Maintain Existing Holdings (Take Care of What We Have'): 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. ","In FY 16 Parks and Trails provided support to central office regional and field operations of seven (7) critical programs (and their component projects) that advance the Legacy mission of 'Maintain Existing Holdings (Take Care of What We Have'): 1. DNR Parks and Trails Regional Renewal and Rehabilitation Priority Projects; 2. Invasive Species Detection Prevention and Control; 3. Landscape Reconstruction; 4. Prescribed Burning; 5. Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas; 6.Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges; and 7. Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks. (see individual programs for accomplishments). ",,,,450409,988524,,15.65,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2015,803121,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,20.4,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2014,823500,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,20.4,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2013,570000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,6300900,570000,,7.73,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
18197,"Maintaining Existing Holdings -A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective",2012,595000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,6393750,595000,,7.73,,,"Maintaining Existing Holdings - A Parks and Trails Strategic Objective is a program area representing DNR's commitment to one of the four pillars identified in the 25 year Legacy plan. The Legacy plan calls this Take Care of What We Have, and identifies its purpose to provide safe, high-quality park and trail experiences by regular re-investment in park and trail infrastructure, and natural resource management. The purpose of this program is to call attention to the pillar, but also to centralize and streamline reporting on other related programs within the Maintain Existing Holdings pillar. Thus, this program captures all the information about what are known as direct and necessary administrative costs of managing the seven other programs that make up this pillar, as well as all information on the number of full time equivalent (or FTE) positions supported by the Legacy funds allocated to DNR Parks and Trails under this pillar. Direct and necessary administrative costs include a wide range of activities, such as accounting and managerial expertise; a list of administrative activities has been compiled in Minnesota Management and Budget's Guidance to Agencies on Legacy Fund Expenditure. Other costs included in this program include direct, non-administrative costs of doing the work of Maintaining Existing Holdings that do not fall directly in one of the seven related programs. This includes a range of professional staff or contractor services and materials needed to do the work. FTEs reported here are consistent with the guidelines provided by the Legislative Coordinating Commission. ","Resulting from the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, the Minnesota Legislature instructed the DNR Division of Parks and Trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors (2)Acquire land and create opportunities (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan In addition, the MN Legislature directed all recipients of Legacy funds to report all direct expenses, administration costs, and number of full time equivalents (FTE's) funded by Legacy dollars. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund",,,,Phil,Leversedge,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"() -",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Fund Administration, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/maintaining-existing-holdings-parks-and-trails-strategic-objective,,,,
33964,"MCF Oral History Collection",2016,10000,"Laws of Minnesota for 2011 Chapter 6, Article 4, Subdivision 5, Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants.","Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants. $5,250,000 the first year and $5,250,000 the second year are for history programs and projects operated or conducted by or through local, county, regional, or other historical or cultural organizations; or for activities to preserve significant historic and cultural resources.","Available upon request. Contact",,,,"Available upon request. Contact",10000,,"Brad Kruse, Chair; June Noronha, Vice Chair; JoAnn Birkholz, Secretary; Steve joul, Treasurer; Kathleen Annette, Susan Bass Roberts, Kim Borton, Sarah Duniway, Kim Embretson, Frank Forsberg, Chris Fulton, Jim Garness, Daniel Lemm, Judson McNeil, Mary Jane Melendez, Gary Nan Tie, Timothy M. Ober, Tim Thorpe, Kevin Walker",0.00,"Minnesota Council on Foundations","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To document in 8 oral history interviews the history of philanthropy in Minnesota.",,,2015-09-01,2016-09-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Trista,Harris,"Minnesota Council on Foundations","100 Portland Avenue South, Suite 225",Minneapolis,MN,55401,612-338-1989,,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mcf-oral-history-collection,,"Minnesota Historical Society Governing Board: William R. Stoeri, President Missy S. Thompson, Vice President Ruth Huss, Vice President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary Dean M. Nelson, Treasurer Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Robert Bruininks Judith S. Corson D. Stephen Elliott Phyllis Rawls Goff William D. Green David R. Hakensen Ruth S. Huss Martha Kaemmer Dennis L. Lamkin David M. Larson Charles Mahar Dean M. Nelson Elizabeth M. Nordlie Dennis Nguyen Peter R. Reis Hussein Samatar Simon Stevens Susan Kenny Stevens William R. Stoeri Karen Wilson Thissen Missy Staples Thompson Eleanor Winston Ex-Officio: Mark Dayton, Governor Yvonne Prattner Solon Lieutenant Governor Mark Ritchie, Secretary of State Lori Swanson, Attorney General Rebecca Otto, State Auditor",,
10004499,"Metro Conservation Corridors Phase VIII - Coordination and Mapping and Conservation Easements",2016,515000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 09e","$515,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources for an agreement with the Minnesota Land Trust for Phase VIII of the Metro Conservation Corridors partnership to provide coordination and mapping for the partnership and to acquire permanent conservation easements on at least 120 acres of strategic ecological landscapes to protect priority natural areas in the metropolitan area, as defined under Minnesota Statutes, section 473.121, subdivision 2, and portions of the surrounding counties. A list of proposed easement acquisitions must be provided as part of the required work plan. Land acquired with this appropriation must be sufficiently improved to meet at least minimum management standards, as determined by the commissioner of natural resources. Expenditures are limited to the identified project corridor areas as defined in the work plan. Up to $40,000 may be used for coordination and mapping for the Metro Conservation Corridors. All conservation easements must be perpetual and have a natural resource management plan. A list of proposed easement acquisitions must be provided as part of the required work plan. This appropriation is available June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Land Trust","Non-Profit Business/Entity",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_09e.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Wayne,Ostlie,"Minnesota Land Trust","2345 University Ave W, Ste 400","St. Paul",MN,55114,"(651) 647-9590",wostlie@mnland.org,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-conservation-corridors-phase-viii-coordination-and-mapping-and-conservation,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2024,723080,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2023,545181,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ",,,,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2022,738011,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2021,543436,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2020,533891,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To acquire land with regional and statewide significance representative of the diverse landscapes in Minnesota as a means to protect and conserve those resources and to provide outdoor recreation for current and future generations. Leverage Legacy funds to provide enhancement and flexibility to acquire highest priority parcels located within State Park statutory designated boundary and State Trail legislatively authorized corridors. DNR will seek to acquire approximately 175 new acres of priority state park and trail inholdings and connections during FY 2020 guided by the principles in the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2019,533063,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To acquire land with regional and statewide significance representative of the diverse landscapes in Minnesota as a means to protect and conserve those resources and to provide outdoor recreation for current and future generations. Leverage Legacy funds to provide enhancement and flexibility to acquire highest priority parcels located within State Park statutory designated boundary and State Trail legislatively authorized corridors. DNR will seek to acquire approximately 77 new acres of priority state park and trail inholdings and connections during FY 2019 guided by the principles in the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ","Acquisitions in FY 19 using Legacy dollars included four parcels totaling 30.19 acres. Units with acquisitions included Gateway State Trail (4.04 acres) Itasca State Park (20 acres) Goodhue-Pioneer State Trail (0.1 acres) and Tettegouche State Park (6.05 acres). ",,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2018,500000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To acquire land with regional and statewide significance representative of the diverse landscapes in Minnesota as a means to protect and conserve those resources and to provide outdoor recreation for current and future generations. Leverage Legacy funds to provide enhancement and flexibility to acquire highest priority parcels located within State Park statutory designated boundary and State Trail legislatively authorized corridors. DNR will seek to acquire approximately 26 new acres of priority state park inholdings during FY 2018 guided by the principles in the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ","Acquisitions in FY18 using Legacy dollars included three parcels totaling 16.35 acres. Units with acquisitions included the Mill Towns State Trail Maplewood State Park (a 14.75 acre island) and Heartland State Trail. ",,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2017,1111000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To acquire land with regional and statewide significance representative of the diverse landscapes in Minnesota as a means to protect and conserve those resources and to provide outdoor recreation for current and future generations. Leverage Legacy funds to provide enhancement and flexibility to acquire highest priority parcels located within State Park statutory designated boundary and State Trail legislatively authorized corridors.","Acquisitions in FY17 using Legacy dollars included one parcel on the Heartland State Trail totaling 0.78 acres.",,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2016,838045,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To acquire land with regional and statewide significance representative of the diverse landscapes in Minnesota as a means to protect and conserve those resources and to provide outdoor recreation for current and future generations.","Acquisitions in FY16 included 8 parcels (66 acres) that secured an alignment for a state park trail within Itasca State Park protected shoreline and river frontage in Crow Wing State Park three in-holdings within statutory boundary of Forestville-Mystery Cave Whitewater and Jay Cooke State Parks and Lake Bemidji shoreline along the Paul Bunyan State Trail for current and future generations to enjoy and appreciate natural and cultural resources.",,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2015,700000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To acquire land with regional and statewide significance representative of the diverse landscapes in Minnesota as a means to protect and conserve those resources and to provide outdoor recreation for current and future generations.","Acquisitions included 5 parcels (318 acres) along various snowmobile trails in northeastern Minnesota a 16 acre parcel in Jay Cooke State Park a 40 acre parcel in Temperance State Park two parcels (~5 acres) along the Mill Towns State Trail and an important parcel (~4 acres) along the Central Lakes State Trail.",,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2014,737500,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To acquire land with regional and statewide significance representative of the diverse landscapes in Minnesota as a means to protect and conserve those resources and to provide outdoor recreation for current and future generations.","Acquisition included a 6.6 acre parcel along the Mill Towns State Trail.",,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2013,1500000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To acquire land with regional and statewide significance representative of the diverse landscapes in Minnesota as a means to protect and conserve those resources and to provide outdoor recreation for current and future generations.","The Parks and Trails Division was able to purchase a 7.4 acre parcel of land within Crow Wing State Park. ",,,,,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
13199,"Minnesota State Parks and Trails Land Acquisition",2012,3600000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To acquire land with regional and statewide significance representative of the diverse landscapes in Minnesota as a means to protect and conserve those resources and to provide outdoor recreation for current and future generations.","This project achieved the acquisition of 98 acres in Hubbard County as part of the La Salle Lake State Recreation Area. Lessard Sams Outdoor Heritage and LCCMR funds were used to purchase the remaining 1 102 acres that make up the LaSalle Lake Recreation Area. This recreation area currently features a 40 site campground a boat launch and rental cabins. Future Legacy funds will add a picnic/day use area a fishing pier walking paths and a canoe-in access. ",,,,3600000,,,,,,"Acquire land from willing sellers within the statutory boundaries of State Parks and within statutory designated State Trail corridors. ","The State Parks and Trails acquisitions will provide significant and safe recreational trail connections between communities and other public recreational facilities; create contiguous wildlife corridors between diverse habitats; assist in the preservation and restoration of diverse, locally significant natural plant communities and cultural resources; help reduce impacts of potential future development; provide riparian buffers along wetlands, creeks and lakes; and expand the diversity of outdoor recreation opportunities to inspire the current and next generation to explore the outdoors. ",,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5633",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-parks-and-trails-land-acquisition,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2024,2461549,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2023,2042697,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ",,,,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2022,1740793,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2021,2347609,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2020,3630006,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","Land needed to meet the nature-based outdoor recreation needs of Minnesotans will be acquired and/or developed. High-priority development projects that encourage outdoor recreation participation and enhance or protect natural and cultural resources are completed. Specifically in FY20 we will begin construction on a new shower building at the campground at Splitrock Lighthouse State Park. At Itasca State Park we will also continue design work on the Itasca Bike Trail extension to Bert’s Cabins and Wilderness Drive as-well-as improvements to the bike rental parking. At Cuyuna we will begin design of additional mountain bike trails and a monument sign. ",,,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2019,3695102,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","Land needed to meet the nature-based outdoor recreation needs of Minnesotans will be acquired and/or developed. High-priority development projects that encourage outdoor recreation participation and enhance or protect natural and cultural resources are completed. Specifically in FY19 we are continuing design of a new state-of-the-art campground at Split Rock Lighthouse State Park which will connect to a new planned regional mountain bike trail system (a Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission-funded Legacy project).This project will take several years to complete. Additionally we will complete a new amphitheater at Itasca State Park the trail link between Father Hennepin State Park and the Soo Line South Trail Sibley SP beach wall and a new bison handling facility (corral) at Minneopa State Park.","Specifically in FY19 (second year of the biennium) we began construction on a new campground at Splitrock Lighthouse SP which will connect to a new planned regional mountain bike trail system. Construction of the shower building is set to take place in FY2020. Additionally we completed a new amphitheater at Itasca State Park; finished the trail link between Father Hennepin State Park and the Soo Line South Trail; constructed a beach wall at Sibley State Park; and finished a bison handling facility (corral) at Minneopa State Park. ",,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2018,3151874,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","Land needed to meet the nature-based outdoor recreation needs of Minnesotans will be acquired and/or developed. High-priority development projects that encourage outdoor recreation participation and enhance or protect natural and cultural resources are completed. Specifically in FY18 we are beginning design of a new state-of-the-art campground at Split Rock Lighthouse State Park which will connect to a new planned regional mountain bike trail system (also a Legacy project).This project will take several years to complete. Additionally we will plan and design improvements at Miners Mountain Road at Cuyuna State Rec Are and construct a new amphitheater at Itasca State Park.","Specifically in FY18 (first year of the biennium) we began design of a new state-of-the-art campground at Split Rock Lighthouse State Park which will connect to a new planned regional mountain bike trail system (a Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission-funded Legacy project). This project will take several years to complete. Additionally we constructed a new amphitheater at Itasca State Park (50% complete in FY18) and made major progress on the trail link from Father Hennepin State Park to the Soo Line South Trail. Began construction at Sibley State Park on a new beach wall and ADA access to the beach area.",,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2017,1762912,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To create unforgettable recreation experiences that inspire the public to pass along the love for the outdoors to the next generation. Additionally to enhance the energy efficiency of our recreation facilities.","In FY17 (the second year of the biennium) we completed and opened a major new state-of-the-art campground at Whitewater State Park. Legacy fully funded the planning and construction of the Minneiska Campground which opened in September 2017. The campground features 40 sites with electrical hookups four non-electric tent sites four camper cabins and three group camps. Innovations include a 40 kW solar array that will offset anticipated increases in energy use at the new campground and group camps with dedicated picnic shelters and mixed RV and tent sites Additionally Cuyuna State Recreation Area added 3.4 miles of trail (Huntington and Pennington projects) and developed the mountain bike skills area. Construction on a paved trail connection from Father Hennepin State Park to the Soo Line South Trail began in 2017 and will be completed in 2018. Legacy funds augmented the funds raised the Friends of Maplewood for a new sugarshack at Maplewood State Park. ",,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2016,2313796,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To create unforgettable recreation experiences that inspire the public to pass along the love for the outdoors to the next generation. Additionally to enhance the energy efficiency of our recreation facilities.","In FY16 (the first year of the biennium) we began a major new state-of-the-art campground at Whitewater State Park and made progress on state park projects such as expansion of mountain biking opportunities at Cuyuna State Rec Area and a paved trail connection from Father Hennepin State Park to the Soo Line South Trail. Many projects begun in FY16 will be completed in FY17 (second year of the biennium).",,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2015,2798525,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To create unforgettable recreation experiences that inspire the public to pass along the love for the outdoors to the next generation. Additionally to enhance the energy efficiency of our recreation facilities.","Projects include a new group camp at Lake Bemidji State Park a new day use/picnic area at LaSalle State Recreation Area a new amphitheater at Itasca State Park new trail development at Cuyuna State Recreation Area bison fencing and water supply at Minneopa State Park and campsite electrification projects at Scenic Cascade Sibley Camden and Blue Mounds State Parks.",,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2014,2369007,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To create unforgettable recreation experiences that inspire the public to pass along the love for the outdoors to the next generation. Additionally to enhance the energy efficiency of our recreation facilities.","Projects included a new bike trail in Glendalough State Park new camper cabins in Forestville/Mystery Cave State Park installation of features to allow for canoe-in camping on Beers Island in Maplewood State Park and new yurts in Cuyuna State Recreation Area and Afton and Glendalough State Parks.",,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2013,2273100,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To create unforgettable recreation experiences that inspire the public to pass along the love for the outdoors to the next generation. Additionally to enhance the energy efficiency of our recreation facilities.","Projects including a new trail center at Bear Head Lake State Park a water treatment facility at Soudan Underground Mine and electricity to campsites at various state parks.",,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2012,1190000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To create unforgettable recreation experiences that inspire the public to pass along the love for the outdoors to the next generation. Additionally to enhance the energy efficiency of our recreation facilities.","Projects included camper cabins at Lake Bemidji State Park and solar arrays installed in Itasca Lake Maria and Bear Head Lake State Parks.",,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2011,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
18223,"Minnesota State Park and Recreation Area Development",2010,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,"There are 67 Minnesota State Parks and 7 Minnesota State Recreation areas that each have facilities to serve outdoor recreation users. Funds in this category are used for developing new facilities and include visitor centers, trail centers, roads, parking lots, bridges, campgrounds, and so on. ",,,2010-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-state-park-and-recreation-area-development,,,,
10004466,"Minnesota Native Bee Atlas",2016,790000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03g","$790,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to supplement and enhance existing bee survey efforts by engaging citizens in helping to document the distribution and phenology of wild Minnesota bees and integrating data from all related bee survey efforts into a single publicly accessible, online tool and repository. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2019, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03g.pdf,2015-07-01,2019-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Robert,Blair,"U of MN","1980 Folwell Ave, #200","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(651) 644-1591",blairrB@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-native-bee-atlas-0,,,,
10004481,"Minnesota Biodiversity Atlas for Enhanced Natural Resource Management",2016,340000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03d","$340,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Bell Museum of Natural History to create a publicly accessible, online tool and repository that will electronically integrate over 600,000 existing biodiversity records, 300,000 existing images, and future data and associated imagery pertaining to Minnesota wildlife, plant, and fungi species in order to enhance research, guide field surveys, and inform conservation planning. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN - Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03d.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Keith,Barker,"U of MN - Bell Museum of Natural History","1987 Upper Buford Cir","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-2737",barke042@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-biodiversity-atlas-enhanced-natural-resource-management-0,,,,
10004496,"Minnesota Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center",2016,5000000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a.pdf,2015-07-01,2023-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Robert,Venette,"U of MN - MITTPC","1992 Folwell Ave","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 301-1405",venet001@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-invasive-terrestrial-plants-and-pests-center-2,,,,
10004500,"Minnesota Biological Survey",2016,2450000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03c","$2,450,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources for continuation of the Minnesota biological survey to provide a foundation for conserving biological diversity by systematically collecting, interpreting, monitoring, and delivering data on plant and animal distribution and ecology, native plant communities, and functional landscapes.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"MN DNR","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03c.pdf,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund",Completed,,,Bruce,Carlson,"MN DNR","500 Lafayette Rd","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5083",bruce.carlson@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-biological-survey-1,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2020,250000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 8","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for evaluating and addressing the risks from viruses, bacteria, and protozoa in groundwater supplies and for evaluating land uses that may contribute to contamination of public water systems with these pathogens. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2019,100000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for evaluating and addressing the risks from viruses in water supplies. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2018,100000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for evaluating and addressing the risks from viruses in water supplies. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2017,75000,,"275,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2016,275000,,"275,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2015,800000,"MN Law 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 8(g)","$800,000 the first year and $800,000 second year are for the development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2017. ","-An estimated virus occurrence rate in Minnesota's public water supply wells -Knowledge of virus occurrence and associations with critical factors and indicators -Enhanced groundwater microbial risk management guidance -Guidance to public water systems on how to implement risk management measures if pathogens are present ",,,,,685120,114880,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2014,800000,"MN Law 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 8(g)","$800,000 the first year and $800,000 second year are for the development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2017. ",,,,66000,"United States Geological Survey (USGS) ",800000,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
33299,"Minnesota YMCA Youth in Government",2016,30000,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$150,000 each year is for grants to the Minnesota Civic Education Coalition: Kids Voting St. Paul, the Learning Law and Democracy Foundation, and YMCA Youth in Government to conduct civics education programs for the civic and cultural development of Minnesota youth. Civics education is the study of constitutional principles and the democratic foundation of our national, state, and local institutions and the study of political processes and structures of government, grounded in the under-standing of constitutional government under the rule of law.",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota YMCA Youth in Government","Non-Profit Business/Entity",,,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Orville,Lindquist,"Minnesota YMCA Youth in Government","1801 University Avenue SE",Minneapolis,MN,55414,"612 821 6503",orville.lindquist@ymcatwincities.org,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-ymca-youth-government,,,,
33299,"Minnesota YMCA Youth in Government",2017,29998,,," We will have identified at least 25 new communities - that will result in 10 new groups that participate in Model Assembly or Model United Nations Updated and improved  website and updated social media presence - to help students and adults statewide know how to participate in YIG programs New printed program collateral for use in new communities - to hand out in classroom visits, etc., to build student interest Model Assembly and Model United Nations videos produced and posted to YouTube for use by statewide audiences Program app built and used for conferences - to help students and advisors participate in conference experiences Build and implement 24-hour  ""YIG Sampler"" during conferences - to help prospective students and adults understand YIG more deeply and build excitement for building new groups ","During the grant period, we met or exceeded our program goals: • YIG staff identified, reached out, and connected with teachers and program coordinators from 69 different organizations within Minnesota, including but not limited to eleven 4-H groups in southwestern Minnesota; independent YMCAs in Marshall and St. Cloud; and schools within the Minneapolis Public School District. This outreach resulted in 15 new groups enrolling in the 2017/18 and 2018/19 program year, including Carlton, Cologne, Dilworth, Faribault, Grand Marais, Grand Rapids, Maple Grove, Minneapolis, Owatonna, Pine City, St. Anthony Village, and Virginia, Minnesota. • Website and social media improvements are a continuous process; staff continue to increase access to resources for students and adults to access, especially so those who are new and/or unfamiliar with YIG programming can more easily identify opportunities. • We completed Model Assembly and Model UN printed materials. • We completed two short promotional videos for Model UN and Model Assembly; these videos have posted on YouTube to show audiences across the state what Youth in Government programs are and how they work. • We completed YAPP, a digital program app, for each conference. Participants now have access to a digital conference book and resources that increase engagement with the program. • Both 2017-2018 YIG conferences had a 24 hour “YIG Sampler.” Model Assembly served two groups (two adults, six students) and Model UN served three groups (four adults, five students). ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota YMCA Youth in Government","Non-Profit Business/Entity",,,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Orville,Lindquist,"Minnesota YMCA Youth in Government","1801 University Avenue SE",Minneapolis,MN,55414,"612 821 6503",orville.lindquist@ymcatwincities.org,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-ymca-youth-government,,,,
34075,"Minnesota in the Civil War: Programs and Statewide Outreach and Support",2016,68100,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Viewership of television program and attendance at lectures and related public programs",,,,,68100,110,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Civil War stories of the Oliver Kelley Farm and Historic Fort Snelling were featured in a 30-minute television program and broadcast statewide by Twin Cities Public Television (TPT). A similar TV segment was also aired on the Civil War origins of Juneteenth and how this anniversary continues to to be commemorated in the African American community. These historical topics and many more, including the 1862 U.S, Dakota War, comprised a special 2-hour television program also broadcast by TPT. Both television programs, produced entirely by MNHS, will continue to be aired by TPT for years to come. Minnesota Social Studies teachers will receive their own DVD copies for classroom use. Lifelong learners benefited from a lecture by noted Lincoln scholar Harold Holzer; an entire weekend of Civil War era programming at Historic Fort Snelling; and other statewide programming, including a Duluth dedication on Veterans Day to Civil War vet Albert Woolson. A final report of all Civil War Sesquicentennial activities is being developed and online resources are being archived.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-civil-war-programs-and-statewide-outreach-and-support,,,,
34115,"Minnesota Main Street Partnership",2016,196503,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","Conduct regular training sessions; conduct annual visits and evaluations with designated Main Street programs; update materials with Main Street Four-Point ""Refresh"" approach; provide design and technical assistance.",,,,,196503,2732,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.20,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Minnesota Main Street program is a proven, comprehensive strategy that helps communities create new jobs and businesses while revitalizing buildings and preserving their historic downtowns. MNHS's Heritage Preservation department works with the partners listed above to implement Minnesota Main Street, which provides the tools, training, information, and networking that communities need to revitalize their business districts. There are currently seven Minnesota Main Street designated communities: Faribault, New Ulm, Owatonna, Red Wing, Shakopee, Willmar, and Winona. In the first three quarters of 2015, these cities gained 22 full-time jobs, 55 part-time jobs, and 17 new businesses. During the same period, eight businesses expanded while staying within their downtowns. Volunteers contributed more than 3,500 hours. These cities also saw 59 building rehabilitation projects, five public improvements, and three new construction projects completed, valued at a total of over $9.2 million. In addition, there are 19 associate member communities that receive access to networking opportunities and discounted admissions to trainings.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Capital Development/Rehabilitation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-main-street-partnership,,,,
34123,"Minnesota Digital Library",2016,300000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (5) Digital Library","$300,000 the first year and $300,000 the second year are for a digital library project to preserve, digitize, and share Minnesota images, documents, and historical materials. The Minnesota Historical Society shall cooperate with the Minitex interlibrary loan system and shall jointly share this appropriation for these purposes.","Successful outcomes include increasing the participation of small organizations across the State of Minnesota, increasing the number of digital records searchable through the Digital Public Library of America, and increasing outreach events and launching new programs that target libraries as well as historical societies.",,,,,300000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Minnesota Digital Library (MDL) is a statewide, multi-institutional collaboration that supports discovery, education, and personal enrichment through digitization of and access to the rich historical resources of the state's public and academic libraries, archives, museums and historical societies, while also preserving these resources for future generations. MDL partnered with: ",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-digital-library-2,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2015,1006016,,,,,,,,,,,10.06,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2016,949674,,,,,,,,,,,9.5,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2017,857306,,,,,,,,,,,8.57,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2018,671276,,,,,,,,,,,6.71,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2019,627518,,,,,,,,,,,6.26,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2020,557216,,,,,,,,,,,5.57,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2021,406073,,,,,,,,,,,4.06,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2022,526159,,,,,,,,,,,5.26,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2023,524139,,,,,,,,,,,5.2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2024,802930,,,,,,,,,,,8,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2025,3500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (f) $3,500,000 the first year and $3,500,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2024,3500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (f) $3,500,000 the first year and $3,500,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","The following measures are cumulative over the life of the program. As of June 30, 2024: 1,511 certified farms 1,036,362 current certified acres 2,929 NEW best management practices $92,985,493 has been leveraged ",,3985089,,3179150,237749,,6.43,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2023,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","As of June 30, 2023: 1,374 certified farms 938,851 certified acres 2,239 NEW best management practices 41 partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP $22,100,041 have been leveraged  ",,3652458,,2784558,245618,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2022,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","As of June 20, 2022: 1,240 certified farms 892,578 certified acres 2,478 NEW best management practices 38 partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP $18,466,583 have been leveraged  ",,2804342,,2589035,218389,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2021,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2024. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","See the most recent fiscal year for current measures. ",,2322917,,2527276,270880,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2020,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2024. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","As of December 7, 2020: 977 certified farms 685,767 certified acres 1,998 NEW Best Management Practices 30 partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP $13,319,324 have been leveraged ",,2173217,,2388875,223105,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2019,3000000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (g) $2,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2021. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,2235826,,2200855,188333,,5.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2018,2000000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (g) $2,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2021 ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","At the end of December 2018: Over 690 certified farms More than 449,000 certified acres 1328 NEW Best Management Practices, saving 127 million pounds of soil per year and reducing nitrogen and phosphorus losses. 55-65% of program funds are passed through to local government units and participating farmers: The program is leveraging over $9 million in federal funding to enhance programs in Minnesota ",,2075640,,2217983,221531,,5.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2017,2500000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3S F2527 REVISOR CKM S2527-2 2nd Engrossment (05/22/2016) Starting on line 66.29 ","M.L. 2015: (g) $2,500,000 the first year is and $2,500,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. The commissioner of agriculture shall consult with the United States Department of Agriculture to determine whether other state spending would qualify as a match for the agricultural water quality certification program funds available from the federal government. By January 1, 2016, the commissioner shall submit a report on funding recommendations to the Clean Water Council and the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over agriculture, the  environment and natural resources, and the clean water fund. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2019. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,1982130,,2060920,195404,,5.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2016,2500000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (g) $2,500,000 the first year is to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. The commissioner of agriculture shall consult with the United States Department of Agriculture to determine whether other state spending would qualify as a match for the agricultural water quality certification program funds available from the federal government. By January 1, 2016, the commissioner shall submit a report on funding recommendations to the Clean Water Council and the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over agriculture, the environment and natural resources, and the clean water fund. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2016, and the commissioner may request additional funding for this program for fiscal year 2017. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","• 327 certified farms • 188,153 certified acres • 555 NEW Best Management Practices 65% of program funds are passed through to local government units: -The program is leveraging over $9 million in federal funding to enhance programs in Minnesota. -The program is supporting 8 non-MDA positions. ",,1800000,,1803394,222364,,5.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2015,1500000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (g) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are to implement a Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Measurable outcomes are reported in fiscal year 2014 ","Measurable outcomes are reported in fiscal year 2014 ",,1501256,"$9M NRCS Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP)$100,000 McKnight Foundation$3M dedicated EQIP funding pool ",710340,180563,,3.75,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2014,1500000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (g) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are to implement a Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Measureable outcomes were proposed in fiscal year 2012 and have remained consistent. ","• Number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and other stakeholders at field days, presentations and other education events (Over 120 meetings, events, fields days, and presentations at conferences and tradeshows)• Number of farmers participating in the MAWQCP in each pilot area within the term of the pilot program (31 certified farms, 12,861 acres)• Number of conservation practices implemented (84)• Number of partners involved in local pilots’ activities (15)Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, Wilkin County SWCD, West Otter Tail County SWCD, Whitewater River Watershed Project, Wabasha County SWCD, Winona County SWCD, Olmsted County SWCD, Rural Advantage, Martin County SWCD, Jackson County SWCD, Cottonwood County SWCD, Watonwan County SWCD, Faribault County SWCD, Greater Blue Earth River Basin Alliance, Stearn County SWCD• Amount of money leveraged by the MAWQCP ($12.1 million) ",,1501256,,276712,49598,,"3.75 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2013,132830,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2011: (d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Measureable outcomes were proposed in fiscal year 2012 and have remained consistent. ","These measures are reported as a cumulative over the years of the program. For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,50000,,,132830,,0.85,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2012,173380,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","The MDA is tracking the following information: Number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and other stakeholders at field days, presentations and other education events Number of farmers participating in the MAWQCP in each pilot area within the term of the pilot program Number of conservation practices implemented Number of partners involved in local pilots’ activities Amount of money leveraged by the MAWQCP Upon two-years of pilot operation: a. Have developed an agricultural operation assessment process that functionally addresses water quality impacts and incorporates a process for revisions as practices, management and technology changes become established and approved.  ","Measurable outcomes are reported in fiscal year 2014. These measures are reported as a cumulative over the years of the program. For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,,"Additional federal and state resources for this program will be identified by the advisory committee as well as the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. ",,,,0.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2025,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development or support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2024,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development or support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ","The following numbers are cumulative from FY18 through FY24. As of June 30, 2024 the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library has: 3,840 publications (diverse research articles and scientific reports) 32,700 website visitors 5,046 PDF downloads ",,,,48674,6136,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2023,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development for support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,,56405,7846,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2022,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development for support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. ",," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,36129,4448,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2021,50000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","(e) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,,34849,4722,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2020,50000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (e) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","The following measures are reported cumulatively, as of 11/12/2020: 3,251 publications are available online 13,918 visitors have visited the site  13,031 searches were conducted 3,871 publications were downloaded ",,,,33132,4970,,0.6,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2019,50000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022 "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,38523,3302,,0.6,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2018,50000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","As of January 3, 2019: 2915 publications available Estimated number of website visitors: Since inception: Total = 10,001 2018:  Total = 1500   Estimated number of search sessions: Since inception: 11,458 2018:  2957 Estimated Number of pdf downloads: Since inception: 3576 2018:  614 ",,,,61488,7420,,0.6,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2017,50000,"M.L. 2015: 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for the most up to date information. ",,,,48895,7316,,0.3,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2016,50000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3 ","M.L. 2015: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","For Fiscal Year 2016: Number of publications: 1,393 Number of website visitors New visitors: 2,561 Total visitors: 2,885 Number of search sessions conducted: 2,885 Number of PDF downloads: 535 ",,,,9119,6497,,0.3,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2015,150000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (f) $100,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Any information technology development or support or costs necessary for this research inventory database will be incorporated into the agency's service level agreement with and paid to the Office of Enterprise Technology. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","For Fiscal Year 2015: Number of publications: 1,376 Number of website visitors New visitors: 2,590 Total visitors: 3,419 Number of search sessions conducted: 3,423 Number of PDF downloads: 639 ",,,,66584,35474,"Groups represented by the Steering Team (September 2014- Current): • Buffalo-Red Watershed District Board • Freshwater Society • Metropolitan Council • Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources • Minnesota Corn Growers • Minnesota Department of Agriculture • Minnesota Department of Health • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Minnesota State University Water Resource Center • Mississippi Watershed Management Organization • Pelican River Watershed District • U.S. Geological Survey - Minnesota Water Science Center • University of Minnesota Libraries • University of Minnesota Water Resources Center • Washington County Conservation District * this is a voluntary steering committee, not a board",1,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2014,100000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (f) $100,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Any information technology development or support or costs necessary for this research inventory database will be incorporated into the agency's service level agreement with and paid to the Office of Enterprise Technology. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","In FY14, MDA staff completed development and performance testing of the MnWRL website and populated the website with diverse water research publciations. The website went live with over 1,000 articles searchable by the public. MDA staff also established a diverse Steering Team to help guide MnWRL’s long-term growth and maintenance. Number of publications (1,361) Estimated number of website visitors (2,257) Estimated number of search sessions conducted (1,219) Estimated number of new webiste visitors (679) Number of article downloads (396) ",,,,114514,16309,"Groups represented by the Advisory Committee (May 2011- December 2013): • EOR Inc. • Houston Engineering • Keiser & Associates LLC • Metropolitan Council • Minnesota Agricultural Water Resources Center • Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources • Minnesota Corn Growers • Minnesota Department of Agriculture • Minnesota Department of Health • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Minnesota State University Water Resource Center • Mississippi Watershed Management Organization • Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District • U.S. Geological Survey - Minnesota Water Science Center • University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics • University of Minnesota Department of Soil Water & Climate • University of Minnesota Libraries • University of Minnesota Water Resources Center • USDA Agricultural Research Service • Washington County Conservation District * this is a voluntary advisory committee, not a board",1,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2013,175000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (f) $175,000 the first year and $175,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for the most up to date information. ",,,,,2700,"See Fiscal Year 2014","1 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2012,175000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (f) $175,000 the first year and $175,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,,810,"See Fiscal Year 2014",0.3,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2010,85000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (d) $695,000 the first year and $1,570,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance related to ways agricultural practices contribute to restoring impaired waters and assist with the development of TMDL plans. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,,,"See Fiscal Year 2014",,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
33487,"Mississippi River Vegetation Sampling",2016,13000,,,,,,,,,,,0.10,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","State Government","This project will assist in assessing the quality of the Mississippi River bordering with Wisconsin in partnership with the Minnesota DNR (MNDNR), the Wisconsin DNR (WIDNR) and the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services (MCES). Sampling will be conducted in 2016 using water chemistry and biological indicators, using a 5 state strategy recently developed recently with the leadership of the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association. The Minnesota entities will focus their work on the River from St Anthony Falls to the Chippewa River confluence in Lake Pepin. The Wisconsin DNR will focus their work in the reach below ending at the Root River confluence near La Crosse. This contract provides for the submerged aquatic vegetation indictor for the Minnesota portion.",,,2016-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Megan,Moore,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2422",,Assessment/Evaluation,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-vegetation-sampling,,,,
10004507,"MITPCC #8: Accurate Detection and Integrated Treatment of Oak Wilt (Ceratocystis fagacearum) in Minnesota",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-08.pdf,2015-07-01,2020-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Jeannine,Cavender-Bares,"U of MN","1475 Gortner Ave","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-6337",cavender@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitpcc-8-accurate-detection-and-integrated-treatment-oak-wilt-ceratocystis-fagacearum,,,,
10004462,"MITPPC 12: Developing Robust Identification Assays for Amaranthus Palmeri in Seed Mixtures",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-12.pdf,2015-07-01,2020-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Peter,Reich,"U of MN - MITTPC","Upper Buford Circle, 220f Green Hall","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-4270",preich@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-12-developing-robust-identification-assays-amaranthus-palmeri-seed-mixtures,,,,
10004463,"MITPPC #11: Will Future Weather Favor Minnesota’s Woody Invaders?",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-11.pdf,2015-07-01,2021-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Peter,Reich,"U of MN - MITTPC","Upper Buford Circle, 220f Green Hall","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-4270",preich@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-11-will-future-weather-favor-minnesotas-woody-invaders,,,,
10004475,"MITPPC #2: Mountain Pine Beetle, Phase II: Protecting Minnesota",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-02.pdf,2015-07-01,2021-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Brian,Aukema,"U of MN","1980 Folwell Ave","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 625-5299",BrianAukema@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-2-mountain-pine-beetle-phase-ii-protecting-minnesota,,,,
10004476,"MITPPC #5: Optimizing Tree Injections Against Emerald Ash Borer",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-05.pdf,2015-07-01,2021-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Brian,Aukema,"U of MN","1980 Folwell Ave","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 625-5299",BrianAukema@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-5-optimizing-tree-injections-against-emerald-ash-borer,,,,
10004477,"MITPPC #9: Dispersal Characteristics of Gypsy Moth Larvae to Improve the Effectiveness of Quarantines",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-09.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Brian,Aukema,"U of MN","1980 Folwell Ave","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 625-5299",BrianAukema@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-9-dispersal-characteristics-gypsy-moth-larvae-improve-effectiveness-quarantines,,,,
10004479,"MITPPC #4: Decreasing Environmental Impacts of Soybean Aphid Management",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-04.pdf,2015-07-01,2021-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Robert,Koch,"U of MN","1980 Folwell Ave","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-6771",koch0125@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-4-decreasing-environmental-impacts-soybean-aphid-management,,,,
10004488,"MITPPC #1: Alliaria petiolata Biocontrol: Ecological Host Range of Biocontrol Agents",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-01.pdf,2015-07-01,2020-12-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Roger,Becker,"U of MN","1991 Upper Buford Cir, 411 Borlaug Hall","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 625-5753",becke003@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-1-alliaria-petiolata-biocontrol-ecological-host-range-biocontrol-agents,,,,
10004504,"MITPPC #3: Biological Control of the Soybean Aphid by Aphelinus certus",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-03.pdf,2015-07-01,2021-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,George,Heimpel,"U of MN","1980 Folwell Ave","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3480",heimp001@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-3-biological-control-soybean-aphid-aphelinus-certus,,,,
10004505,"MITPPC #6: Distribution and Traits of the Fungal Pathogen Fusarium virguliforme that Influence Current and Future Risk to Soybean and Other Legumes in Minnesota",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-06.pdf,2015-07-01,2020-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Dean,Malvick,"U of MN","1991 Upper Buford Cir","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 625-5282",dmalvick@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-6-distribution-and-traits-fungal-pathogen-fusarium-virguliforme-influence-current,,,,
10004506,"MITPPC #7: Tools to Distinguish Native from Exotic Reed Canary Grass",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-07.pdf,2015-07-01,2020-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Neil,Anderson,"U of MN","1970 Folwell Ave, 286 Alderman Hall","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-6701",ander044@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-7-tools-distinguish-native-exotic-reed-canary-grass,,,,
10004508,"MITPPC #10: Management Strategies for the Invasive Spotted Wing Drosophila",2016,,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06a","$5,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Invasive Terrestrial Plants and Pests Center established in Laws 2014, chapter 312, article 13, section 44, to conduct research to prevent, minimize, and mitigate the threats and impacts posed by invasive plants, pathogens, and pests to the state's prairies, forests, wetlands, and agricultural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06a-10.pdf,2015-07-01,2020-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Mary,Rogers,"U of MN - MITTPC",,,,,,,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mitppc-10-management-strategies-invasive-spotted-wing-drosophila,,,,
34093,"MNHS Indian Advisory Committee",2016,27050,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Increased contact with IAC members, especially between the formally scheduled meetings. An increased perception by IAC members of authentic engagement by MNHS",,,,,27050,4036,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.40,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The MNHS Indian Advisory Committee (IAC) is made up of tribally appointed representatives of the 11 Minnesota tribes, as well as representatives of key groups, such as educators. IAC advises on planning, developing, and evaluating MNHS activities and initiatives including exhibitions, publications, public programs, and curatorial policy as they relate to the research, collection, preservation, and interpretation of Minnesota and American Indian history in Minnesota. Relationships among IAC members, MNHS, and tribal communities are supported by thrice-annual meetings held at various tribal communities around the state. IAC members learn about current work happening within MNHS in their own communities. For example, the October 2015 IAC meeting was hosted by the Red Lake Nation. IAC members and MNHS staff toured the newly built Red Lake tribal college and government buildings and heard a presentation given by Brenda Child, MNHS Executive Council representative on the IAC and enrolled Red Lake member. Also, in a newly expanded role, the IAC coordinator now assists in developing and carrying out institutional community outreach strategies through the work of MNHS's Department of Inclusion and Community Engagement.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mnhs-indian-advisory-committee,,,,
34068,"MNopedia: The Minnesota Encyclopedia",2016,181590,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","We track website traffic and demographics through Google Analytics, and are planning an statewide evaluation in spring 2016 to determine educator usage of the website. We periodically assess content to determine gaps and work to fill them.",,,,,181590,25771,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",2.30,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNopedia is an award-winning online encyclopedia of Minnesota created by MNHS, designed for use by a general audience, teachers, and students. In 2015, the MNopedia library grew to include essays on Hmong, African American, and Jewish history, and articles on topics as diverse as Minnesota in World War I, immigration to the Iron Range, Dayton's department store, and the Grange in Minnesota. A new feature, This Day in Minnesota History, a Minnesota book of days, was added. The online newspaper MinnPost published MNopedia articles weekly. MNopedia partnered with the MNHS's Press, Education, and Public Programs departments to actively reach out to 7,800 visitors at 28 events, including visits to historic sites, History Center public programs, teacher workshops, and the Minnesota Library Association and Minnesota Educator Academy conferences. MNopedia's return visitation has increased by 4.9 percent for the period Jan. 1-Nov. 15, 2015, over the same period the previous year, while still reaching a high percentage of new users. MNopedia is commissioning new content on American Indian topics and overviews of Indian Americans and Latinos in Minnesota. Plans are being made to add the Minnesota Place Names database to MNopedia in 2016.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mnopedia-minnesota-encyclopedia-1,,,,
33826,"Model Relationship Between Sulfate and Sulfide in Wild Rice Habitats",2016,5000,,,,,,,,,,,0.01,"Aqua Lux Lucis, Inc.","For-Profit Business/Entity","Using data supplied by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), this project will model the relationship between sulfate and sulfide in wild rice habitats.",,,2016-03-01,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Edward,Swain,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 7572772",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/model-relationship-between-sulfate-and-sulfide-wild-rice-habitats,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2014,1000000,,,,,,,,,,,5,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2015,1000000,,,,,,,,,,,5,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2016,784501,,,,,,,,,,,1.01,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2017,1215690,,,,,,,,,,,2.16,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2018,333620,,,,,,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2019,242494,,,,,,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2020,55500,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2021,83227,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2023,27560,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
36597,"MPCA Stormwater BMP Performance Evaluation and Technology Transfer Program",2016,275000,,,,,,,,,,,,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project will evaluate best management performance and effectiveness to support meeting total maximum daily loads; develop standards and incorporate state of the art guidance using minimal impact design standards as the model; and implement a knowledge and technology transfer system across local government, industry, and regulatory sectors. ",,,2016-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,David,Fairbairn,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,(651)757-2659,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-bmp-performance-evaluation-and-technology-transfer-program,,,,
36597,"MPCA Stormwater BMP Performance Evaluation and Technology Transfer Program",2017,275000,,,,,,,,,,,,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project will evaluate best management performance and effectiveness to support meeting total maximum daily loads; develop standards and incorporate state of the art guidance using minimal impact design standards as the model; and implement a knowledge and technology transfer system across local government, industry, and regulatory sectors. ",,,2016-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,David,Fairbairn,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,(651)757-2659,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-bmp-performance-evaluation-and-technology-transfer-program,,,,
28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2014,162243,,,,,,,,,,,1.48,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,,
28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2015,171456,,,,,,,,,,,1.57,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,,
28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2016,154632,,,,,,,,,,,.97,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,,
28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2017,394892,,,,,,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2014,4105849,,,,,,,,,,,38,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2015,4173501,,,,,,,,,,,33,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2016,5309905,,,,,,,,,,,33.81,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2017,6028498,,,,,,,,,,,35.16,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2018,5481766,,,,,,,,,,,35.11,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2019,5866668,,,,,,,,,,,34.44,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2020,5513679,,,,,,,,,,,35.34,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2021,5289006,,,,,,,,,,,32.94,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2022,5231367,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(b)",,,,,,,,,,33.55,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2023,5583937,,,,,,,,,,,34.62,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2024,5503333,,,,,,,,,,,32.69,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2016,5351892,,,,,,,,,,,44.85,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2017,5528098,,,,,,,,,,,40.82,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2018,5477821,,,,,,,,,,,41.76,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2019,5529246,,,,,,,,,,,40.78,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2020,5483925,,,,,,,,,,,40.27,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2021,5284366,,,,,,,,,,,35,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2022,4956185,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(a)",,,,,,,,,,35.02,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2023,5413432,,,,,,,,,,,36.52,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2024,5971189,,,,,,,,,,,35.27,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2016,53114,,,,,,,,,,,0.5,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2017,80816,,,,,,,,,,,.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2018,182975,,,,,,,,,,,1.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2019,386663,,,,,,,,,,,3.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2020,262427,,,,,,,,,,,2.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2021,215721,,,,,,,,,,,2.1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2022,288794,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(d)",,,,,,,,,,.87,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2023,279451,,,,,,,,,,,.84,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2024,372553,,,,,,,,,,,1.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2014,691911,,,,,,,,,,,6.21,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2015,831629,,,,,,,,,,,7.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2016,755618,,,,,,,,,,,5.75,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2017,764768,,,,,,,,,,,5.61,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2018,743626,,,,,,,,,,,5.14,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2019,821313,,,,,,,,,,,5.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2020,772185,,,,,,,,,,,5.22,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2021,874046,,,,,,,,,,,5.61,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2022,887226,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(e)",,,,,,,,,,5.67,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2023,883851,,,,,,,,,,,5.45,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2024,1092756,,,,,,,,,,,6.4,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2016,567922,,,,,,,,,,,3.29,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2017,620426,,,,,,,,,,,3.83,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2018,693557,,,,,,,,,,,4.21,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2019,632044,,,,,,,,,,,3.54,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2020,671209,,,,,,,,,,,4.4,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2021,677851,,,,,,,,,,,3.24,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2022,600617,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(c)",,,,,,,,,,3.51,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2023,591495,,,,,,,,,,,3.42,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2024,628687,,,,,,,,,,,3.53,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2016,853501,,,,,,,,,,,3.21,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2017,1205491,,,,,,,,,,,3.24,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2018,798114,,,,,,,,,,,1.87,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2019,719141,,,,,,,,,,,1.32,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2020,235001,,,,,,,,,,,1.73,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2021,164683,,,,,,,,,,,1.39,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2022,200292,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(f)",,,,,,,,,,1.25,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2023,215932,,,,,,,,,,,1.45,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2024,180681,,,,,,,,,,,.91,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2014,33940,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2015,39346,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2016,47631,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2017,46084,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2018,50000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2019,41424,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2020,53427,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2021,68378,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2022,285633,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(j)",,,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2023,298802,,,,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2024,342506,,,,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
34102,"Multi-Media Unit",2016,185973,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Measurable outcomes defined by programs served by Multimedia.",,,,,185973,23421,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",2.10,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","A multimedia group has been created to support the development of educational and informational video productions including online curriculum for 6th grade history, the commemoration of the Civil War, WWI, and more.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/multi-media-unit,,,,
10004497,"Native Prairie Stewardship and Prairie Bank Easement Acquisition",2016,3325000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 09d","$3,325,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources to acquire native prairie bank easements on at least 675 acres, prepare baseline property assessments, restore and enhance at least 1,000 acres of native prairie sites, and provide technical assistance to landowners. Of this amount, up to $135,000 must be deposited in a conservation easement stewardship account. Deposits into the conservation easement stewardship account must be made upon closing on conservation easements or at a time otherwise approved in the work plan. A list of proposed easement acquisitions must be provided as part of the required work plan. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"MN DNR","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_09d.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Judy,Schulte,"MN DNR","1241 Bridge St E","Redwood Falls",MN,56283,"(507) 822-0344",judy.schulte@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/native-prairie-stewardship-and-prairie-bank-easement-acquisition-2,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2024,1309326,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2023,1392073,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","FY23 Legacy funding will support the following new trail and bridge development: • Gateway State Trail/Lorient St Realignment – 0.5 miles • Gitchi Gami State Trail – Silver Creek Bridge (in cooperation with MnDOT) ",,,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2022,1429356,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ",,"FY22 Legacy funding supported the following new trail development: • Gitchi Gami State Trail/Grand Marais to Cutface Creek Wayside – 3.5 miles • Heartland State Trail/Steamboat Loop Segment – 1.5 miles • Minnesota Valley State Trail – Design Only for Bloomington Segments ",,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2021,1480034,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","The construction of the Segment 1B of the Minnesota Valley State Trail will provide a pedestrian and bicycle connection along the Minnesota River between Cedar Ave and the new 35W pedestrian pathway. Trail 1B construction to start Fall 2021. Eventually the trail will connect segments along the Minnesota River from Hwy 169 to Fort Snelling. Initial construction of a trail tunnel on the Heartland Trail is to be completed in 2021/2022 with a 2020 Capital Bond appropriation of $2M. The first phase of trail development on this segment is to be the construction of a trail tunnel under Hwy 71 4 miles south of the Itasca SP South entrance. This tunnel will also allow an immediate safety improvement by eliminating an existing at-grade road crossing for the existing grant-in-aid snowmobile trail. Legacy funds provided for the completion of the final engineering specifications and plans for Minnesota River State Trail from Appleton to the USACE Marsh Lake Dam Recreation Area. Trail is to be constructed cooperatively by Swift County on behalf of the DNR. Supplemental funds for construction engineering and inspection for the 2.5 mile segment of the Cuyuna Lakes State Trail located between Crosby and Deerwood. The development of this State Trail segment has been a cooperative effort between Deerwood Crosby Crow Wing County and the MN DOT.",,,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2020,206193,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","Specifically FY20 Legacy funding will support: • Required construction engineering construction oversight and limited supplemental cost associated with the development of the 1.7 mile Bloomington Segment 1A of the Minnesota Valley State Trail (For this $3.2 M project Legacy is adding $30k for construction oversight only). When the construction of Segments 1A and 1B are complete a pedestrian trail corridor will parallel the banks of the Minnesota River and provide a connection between the pedestrian trails which traverse the river at I-35 and TH 77. The current development priorities for the MN Valley State Trail are to provide a contiguous trail corridor through Bloomington and Fort Snelling State Park. • Provide for the preliminary feasibility design engineering and construction estimates for a new 17+ mile long segment of the Heartland State Trail located between the town of Emmaville and Itasca State Park. ","In cooperation with the City of Bloomington completed engineering construction oversight and construction of the Bloomington 1.65 mile Segment 1A of the Minnesota Valley State Trail. Segment 1A opened to the public September 2020. Through partnership with City of Bloomington and USFWS completed plans & specifications for 1.7 mile Segment 1B to extend the State Trail to the old and new Cedar Ave bridge. Completed preliminary feasibility design for 17-mile Heartland Trail between Emmaville and Itasca State Park Hubbard County. Engineering was completed for the Renewal and rehabilitation of a Segment of the Sakatah-Singing Hills State Trail impacted by FEMA-designated disaster following rain event and related erosion and need for significant bank stabilization and reconstruction.",,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2019,124966,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","FY19 measurable goals: Specifically in FY19 Legacy funds will: • support development of a new segment of the Mill Towns ST. (For this $1.3M project Legacy is adding $15k leveraging approximately $800k in federal Transportation Alternatives Program dollars.) Outcomes will be a new pedestrian bridge over the Cannon River and about ¾ mile of trail in the City of Faribault; • pay for vault toilet design work at C.J. Ramstad/North Shore State Trail (one new and two replacements). Again Legacy provides a critical match to leverage federal Recreational Trail Program dollars. ","Specifically in FY19 Legacy contributed to: • the final planning design and partial construction funding for the installation of new vault toilets along the Northshore/CJ Ramstad State Trail. Construction was initiated but not completed in FY19. • the construction of the new Milltowns State Trail bridge and trail segment was completed and opened to the public in FY19 ($65 000). • provided limited supplementary funding for the completion of the construction of the West Road Segment of the Gichi Gami ST ($10 000). Update on the proposed Silver Creek cooperative agreement with MnDOT: The Department of Transportation is working on the project design including the trail component – project letting is currently scheduled for later in calendar 2020. ",,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2018,22390,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","Land needed to meet the nature-based outdoor recreation needs of Minnesotans will be acquired and/or developed. High-priority development projects that encourage outdoor recreation participation and enhance or protect natural and cultural resources are completed. Specifically in FY18 we plan to construct one key trail connection and trail bridge (Silver Creek coop with MNDOT).","FY18 accomplishments: Specifically in FY18 Legacy contributed to the planning and design of Gateway ST tunnel under Hadley Ave a project with significant safety improvements for trail users. Update on the proposed Silver Creek cooperative agreement with MnDOT. The Department of Transportation is working on the project design including the trail component – project letting is currently scheduled for later in calendar 2019. ",,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2017,942102,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","Land needed to meet the nature-based outdoor recreation needs of Minnesotans will be acquired and/or developed. High-priority development projects that encourage outdoor recreation participation and enhance or protect natural and cultural resources are completed. Specifically in FY17 we plan to develop a critical half mile connection of the Gitchi Gami State Trail between Silver Bay and Beaver Bay and develop a trailhead on the Central Lakes State Trail in Fergus Falls.","In FY 17 we developed a critical half mile connection of the Gitchi Gami State Trail between Silver Bay and Beaver Bay and a trailhead on the Central Lakes State Trail in Fergus Falls.",,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2016,794100,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To create unforgettable recreation experiences that inspire the public to pass along the love for the outdoors to the next generation. ","In FY16 we completed design and planning for the development of the Gitchi-Gami State Trail West Road connection (Beaver Bay to Silver Bay) to be constructed in 2017. (New trail miles were developed in 2016 just not with Legacy Funds).",,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2015,2406214,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To create unforgettable recreation experiences that inspire the public to pass along the love for the outdoors to the next generation. ","This year we completed the 6 mile Browns Creek State Trail. In addition several other projects will be completed including paving more than 20 miles of the Luce State Trail to constructing a memorial parking lot on the Glacial Lakes State Trail and constructing three important trail bridges that will allow for new trail development along the Mill Towns and Blazing Star State Trails.",,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2014,2502218,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To create unforgettable recreation experiences that inspire the public to pass along the love for the outdoors to the next generation. ","A 3-mile segment of trail was completed on the Minnesota State Trail from Shakopee Memorial Park to the USFWS parking lot in Shakopee MN. In addition significant construction progress was also made on the Brown's Creek connection to the Gateway and on a connection from the Paul Bunyan State Trail into Crown Wing State Park. Both of these projects will be completed by late summer/fall 2014.",,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2013,200000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To create unforgettable recreation experiences that inspire the public to pass along the love for the outdoors to the next generation. ","In FY12 the Parks and Trails Division initiated the engineering and design for the development of key sections of new improved State Trail along the Browns Creek Luce Line and Paul Bunyan State Trails. Construction of the 6 mile Paul Bunyan State Trail segment has been completed. ",,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
18222,"New State Trail Construction",2012,1500000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(2)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"New State Trail development to complete key missing trail segments or to fulfill funding gaps in trail development projects. Potetial development to include multi-use trail, trail parking areas, trail waysides, or trail bridges. New trail development includes all associated engineering, design and construction, and is to incorporate current Best Management Practices. ","The MnDNR Parks and Trails Divisions new State trail development efforts are focused on previously undeveloped sections that provide key trail connections, enhance user safety and accessiblity and further the efforts to complete the State Trails as defined. ",,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/new-state-trail-construction,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2025,1600000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(f)","$1,600,000 the first year and $1,600,000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities and targeted forest stewardship for water quality. ","Watershed planning and site-scale technical assistance: Continue using our hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity data, analyses and expertise to contribute to CWMPs and to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of actual, planned, or proposed on-the-ground water quality/water management projects, including projects identified as priorities in approved Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CWMPs). Work with local partners to write 40 forest stewardship plans covering 2,600 woodland acres, with cost share and technical assistance for around 90 projects on 400 to 750 acres to improve water quality in priority areas identified in Landscape Stewardship Plans and CWMPs for four southeastern MN watersheds. Plant trees in four central MN watersheds where tree planting is an identified priority. Information resources: Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related datasets. Continue helping local 1W1P partnerships and groups like the Northern Waters Land Trust, Minnesota Land Trust, and Natural Shorelines Partnership use this information to prioritize lakes for protection. Continue helping local partners develop and apply higher water quality standards in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Develop and coordinate a lake resiliency and climate change conference for LGUs. Collaborate with the UM Climate Adaptation Partnership to develop training to help agency staff communicate with LGUs about climate change impacts on water quality and the need to act. Continue technical guidance for the interagency fish contamination assessment program and help migrate historical data to MPCA for public access. Watershed science outreach: Continue outreach on the science of watershed health to help implementers and practitioners understand root causes of water quality problems and apply multiple-benefit solutions.   ",,,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2024,1600000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(f)","$1,600,000 the first year and $1,600,000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities and targeted forest stewardship for water quality. "," Watershed planning: Participate in all 15 to 20 One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects in progress to develop or update Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CWMPs) by contributing relevant data and information and reviewing plans. Implementation technical assistance: Continue building on our participation in 1W1P and using our hydrology, stream geomorphology, and connectivity information and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of actual, planned, or proposed on-the-ground water quality or water management projects, including many identified as priorities in approved CWMPs. Our past assistance to local partners in evaluating, designing and implementing culvert/bridge replacements using the geomorphic approach has spawned a new grant program which will fund this work in the FY24-25 biennium. Protecting lakes, shoreland and floodplains: Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related datasets and continue to help watershed partners use the information to prioritize lakes for protection. Continue helping local partners develop and apply higher standards for water quality in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase, adding pages related to climate change and vanishing shorelines. Collaborate with local partners to provide forest stewardship plans, cost share and technical assistance to private forest landowners to help protect or restore water quality in priority lakes identified by local partners in CWMPs in northern Minnesota. Fish contamination: Continue providing technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Watershed science outreach: Continue outreach on the topics above to help stakeholders and practitioners understand root causes of water quality problems and use scientific data and information to apply multiple-benefit solutions. ","Watershed planning: Field staff contributed information and reviewed drafts for at least 20 1W1P plan development or amendment efforts. Site-scale technical assistance: Field staff used their hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity data, analyses and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, or monitor over 120 actual, planned or proposed projects in 45 major watersheds, 49% of which we assisted for the first time this year (the work may span years as projects go from conceptual to built). Nearly 95% involve restoring stream channels or stabilizing banks and almost 60% involve stream crossings. About 65% are beyond the idea stage. Worked with local partners to write forest stewardship plans for two landowners, providing cost-share and technical assistance on 103 acres to protect water quality in priority areas in the Root and Cannon River watersheds.  Information resources: Specialists updated the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index, lake hydrology datasets with lake health scores, and cost-benefit data (now in WHAF for Lakes). Helped 1W1P partners and others use the data to prioritize lakes for protection. Further developed and helped local partners use higher water quality standards in shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Helped launch a Natural Shorelines Partnership. Created a Climate Trends Affecting Shorelands webpage and guidance to help LGUs and citizens protect natural shorelines. Provided fish contamination assessment technical guidance on sampling protocols, mercury in fish tissue trend analysis, and PFAS monitoring and analysis. Crafted alternative methods to assess impairment for mercury in fish tissue. Watershed science outreach: Field staff delivered 14 presentations and conducted two field tours and two trainings, reaching over 615 LGU staff, other environmental professionals, teachers, students and other stakeholders throughout Minnesota.   ",,,,1077276,182058,,8.2,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2023,1250000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","Watershed planning:Serve on advisory committees for around 25 One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects to develop or update Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CWMPs). Continue to contribute relevant data and information and to review draft and final plans. Implementation technical assistance: Continue building on our participation in 1W1P and using our hydrology, stream geomorphology, and connectivity information and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of actual, planned, or proposed on-the-ground water quality or water management projects, including many identified as priorities in approved CWMPs. Continue to evaluate and help partners implement culvert and bridge replacements using the geomorphic approach to connect stream channels to floodplains, improve safety and resilience, and reduce maintenance needs, while also improving stream stability and ecological functions. (Specially designed floodplain culverts distribute channel-overtopping flow in floodplains instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge.) Protecting lakes, shoreland and floodplains: Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related datasets and continue to help watershed partners use this information to prioritize lakes for protection. Continue helping local partners develop and apply higher standards for water quality in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Fish contamination: Continue providing technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Watershed science outreach: Continue outreach on the topics above to help stakeholders and practitioners understand root causes of water quality problems and use scientific data and information to apply multiple-benefit solutions. "," Watershed planning: Served on advisory committees for 25 1W1P plan development efforts, contributing data and information and reviewing draft and final plans. Implementation technical assistance: Used our hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity data, analyses and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement and/or monitor the effectiveness of more than 95 actual, planned or proposed water cleanup/management projects in 37 major watersheds, 35 of which we assisted for the first time this year. (Our assistance often spans a few years as projects progress from conceptual to on-the-ground.) Nearly 55% of the projects we assisted this year involve restoring stream channels and/or stabilizing streambanks and nearly 40% involve stream crossings, including at least 6 using the geomorphic approach for planned culvert/bridge replacements. Protecting lakes, shoreland and floodplains: Updated the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index, lake hydrology dataset and cost-benefit data with new water quality data and helped local partners use these data to prioritize lakes for protection. Helped develop and launch a new interactive lake information tool in DNR’s Watershed Health Assessment Framework. Helped local partners use higher water quality standards in shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase, to which we added pages on riprap and retaining walls. Fish contamination: Provided technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Helped develop fish sampling protocols, mercury in fish tissue trend analysis, and PFAS monitoring and analysis. Watershed science outreach: Reached nearly 1000 local, state and federal government staff at local, regional and statewide events; 125 professionals at a national conference; and many TV viewers and local radio listeners.   ",,,,1013806,180271,,7.9,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2022,1250000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. "," Continue using DNR hydrology, stream geomorphology and connectivity information and expertise (see Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies) and building on our participation in One Watershed One Plan projects (see below) to help local government units (LGUs) and other partners identify, develop, propose, target, design implement and/or monitor the effectiveness of on-the-ground water quality or water management projects – including many identified as priorities in Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CNMPs). Participate in advisory committees for 28 1W1P projects and contribute information to aid CNMP development. Participate in one or more CNMP plan review and update efforts. Continue evaluating sites for specially designed floodplain culverts at road/river crossings and quantifying their environmental benefits. (Floodplain culverts allow runoff to flow naturally during a flood distributing high flows and energy across a stream’s floodplain instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge.) Continue promoting the approach; planning for potential accelerated future implementation to make transportation infrastructure more resilient to climate change; and quantifying the effects on floodplain and channel connectivity at the watershed scale, where projects are being implemented. Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index with new water quality data from MPCA. Continue education and outreach on prioritizing lakes for protection to targeted audiences. Provide technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Continue outreach to help water managers and other stakeholders understand specific aspects of watershed science, including the root causes of water quality problems and multiple-benefit ways to address them. ","Watershed planning: Served on advisory committees for 26 1W1P plan development efforts, contributing relevant data and information and reviewing draft and final plans. Implementation project assistance: Used our hydrology, geomorphology, and connectivity data, analyses, and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of more than 80 actual, planned, or proposed water cleanup or management projects in 33 major watersheds. Our technical assistance often spans several years as projects progress from conceptual to on-the-ground; this year we assisted at least 30 projects for the first time. More than 55 of the projects we assisted this year involve restoring stream channels and/or stabilizing streambanks and more than 20 involve stream crossings, including 9 using the DNR’s geomorphic approach to evaluate culvert/bridge replacements. More than 35 of the projects we assisted this year were identified as priorities in local water plans. Lake, shoreland and floodplain protection: Updated the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and cost-benefit data with new MPCA water quality data. Added Lake Health Scores to an existing lake hydrology dataset. Continued helping local partners use these data to prioritize lakes for protection. Further developed and helped local partners use higher standards for water quality in their shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Fish contamination: Provided technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Watershed science outreach: In presentations on the above topics, reached 75 high school students, at least 160 local watershed management planning partnership or stakeholder groups in several Minnesota watersheds, and more than 475 practitioners from Minnesota and other states. ",,,,901868,148250,,7.5,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2021,1000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. "," Continue using DNR hydrology stream geomorphology and connectivity information and expertise (see Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies) to help local government units (LGUs) and other partners identify develop propose target design and/or implement on-the-ground water quality projects. Participate in all active One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) advisory committees (for an estimated 25 plan development projects) by providing information to aid plan development and reviewing draft plans. Participate in plan mid-term review and update efforts for up to five existing plans. Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index with new water quality data from MPCA; Update the Lakes of Biological Significance dataset. Continue outreach on prioritizing lakes for protection to targeted audiences. Continue outreach on higher water quality standards in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Continue evaluating potential sites for specially designed 'floodplain culverts' at road/river crossings and quantifying their environmental benefits. Floodplain culverts allow runoff to flow naturally during a flood distributing high flows and energy across a stream's floodplain instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge. Continue educational and outreach efforts to help water managers' and other stakeholders' understand specific aspects of watershed science including root causes of water quality problems and the potential to address them in ways that provide multiple benefits. "," Used our hydrology and geomorphology and connectivity data to help local partners identify develop propose target design implement and/or monitor the effectiveness of more than 95 on-the-ground water quality or water management projects in 39 major watersheds. Most relate to stabilizing stream banks and/or restoring stream channels; others involve removing or modifying dams improving lake shorelines or outlets designing ecologically resilient 'floodplain culverts' at problematic road-river crossings and more. Project development planning and implementation can take years. Many of the projects assisted this year were identified by LGUs as priorities in watershed management plans. Participated in advisory committees for 26 1W1P planning projects involving contributing information for plan development and draft plan review and comments. Participated in one plan mid-term review/update. Provided technical guidance and statistical analyses to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Improved data used to help prioritize lakes for protection: Updated lake water quality data in the DNR Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related cost-benefit data. Developed new lake hydrology metrics available at https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-lake-hydrology. Reached over 200 state and local government staff in presentations related to prioritizing lakes for protection. Reached hundreds of Minnesota professionals and stakeholders in presentations on stream restorations projects featured in a multi-state symposium a DNR Roundtable video and a Clean Water Council field tour. Provided culvert design and inventory training to over 100 state and local government staff. Reached at least 125 participants in five 1W1P projects with presentations about DNR Evaluation of Hydrologic Change (EHC) findings. Completed two watershed posters that reached at least 80 1W1P participants and completed or worked on similar fact sheets or posters for four other watersh ",,,,952288,132765,,8.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2020,1000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","Technical assistance with implementation projects: Continue applying our hydrology stream geomorphology and connectivity information and expertise (see Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies) to help local government units (LGUs) identify develop propose target design and/or implement on-the-ground water quality projects.   Conservation planning: Participate in 24 One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) planning projects by contributing information serving on 1W1P advisory committees and reviewing draft plans. Continue training 1W1P consultants in using the Zonation conservation planning tool to help local 1W1P partnerships identify watershed management priorities. Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index with new water quality data from MPCA. Continue outreach on prioritizing lakes for protection to targeted audiences. Update the Lakes of Biological Significance dataset. Continue outreach on higher water quality standards in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances via training and new content on the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase webpage. Continue evaluating potential sites for specially designed “floodplain culverts” at road/river crossings and quantifying their environmental benefits. Floodplain culverts allow runoff to flow naturally during a flood distributing high flows and energy across a stream’s floodplain instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge. This alternative to traditional culverts has great potential to improve watershed health and resiliency. Increase our outreach efforts including a paper accepted at the Transportation Resilience International 2019 Conference in Washington D.C.   Other outreach and education: Continue educational and outreach efforts to help water managers’ and other stakeholders’ understand specific aspects of watershed science including root causes of water quality problems and the potential to address them in ways that provide multiple benefits. ","Used our hydrology geomorphology and connectivity data to help local partners identify develop propose target design and/or implement at least 75 on-the-ground water quality projects in 33 major watersheds. Most involve stream channel restoration or stream bank stabilization. Identified and helped implement design or advance floodplain culverts as a solution at road/river crossings in at least 7 watersheds and presented the approach at a national conference on climate change and transportation infrastructure resilience. Worked with consulting foresters Soil & Water Conservation Districts the Board of Water & Soil Resources and others to complete landscape stewardship plans with forestry recommendations for five major watersheds that supply drinking water to St Cloud and the Twin Cities and have completed or approved local watershed management plans. DNR collaborated with partners in these watersheds to write 223 stewardship plans covering 32 088 acres of private forestland and worked with landowners to protect 21 262 acres of working forestland via the Sustainable Forestry Incentives Act—mostly in subwatersheds considered high-priority for water quality. Participated in 21 One Watershed One Plan advisory committees providing information to aid plan development and reviewing draft plans. Updated the Lakes of Biological Significance dataset lake water quality data in the DNR Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and cost-benefit data that MPCA and LGUs use to prioritize lakes for protection. Reached over 200 state and local government professionals in related presentations. Presented on enhanced water quality protection in local ordinances to about 175 professionals throughout the state. Reached over 250 local decision-makers natural resource managers and others in at least ten other watershed science presentations in nine watersheds. Reached 20 higher education students and others in geomorphic and culvert inventory training events. ",,,,1019070,146921,,8.7,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2019,950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$950000 the first year and $950000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","Technical assistance: In FY19 DNR regional staff will continue helping local governments identify prioritize develop target design and implement clean water restoration and protection projects designed to provide enduring water quality and other environmental and economic benefits. Conservation planning: In FY19 DNR field staff will contribute to 22 local watershed planning (One Watershed One Plan) projects by communicating DNR priorities participating in advisory committee meetings and reviewing plan or chapter drafts. We will help local partners prioritize lakes for investment and set measurable protection and restoration goals using water quality phosphorus sensitivity and benefit-cost data. The DNR Land Use Unit will create a webpage showcasing local examples of high shoreland management standards and continue “floodplain culvert” outreach and technical assistance as well as sediment analysis and advanced modeling of this alternative practice to determine effectiveness at the watershed scale. Forest stewardship: In FY19 the DNR will continue to provide forest stewardship plans to landowners in targeted watersheds. We will also complete three to five landscape-level stewardship plans in association with local watershed management planning (One Watershed One Plan) in headwaters of the Redeye River and Rum River watersheds. The landscape-level plans will help local governments incorporate forestry recommendations into comprehensive watershed management plans. Outreach & education: In FY19 DNR staff will continue educational and outreach efforts to help water managers’ and other stakeholders’ understand specific aspects of watershed science including root causes of water quality problems and the potential to address them in ways that provide multiple benefits. ","Technical assistance with implementation projects: Used our hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity information to help local governments (LGUs) identify, develop, propose, target, design and/or implement over 80 water quality projects in 39 major watersheds. Most involve stream restoration or dam removals. Conservation planning assistance:                                  • Participated in 22 One Watershed One Plan projects. Provided information, served on advisory committees and reviewed draft plans. • Refined the lake phosphorus sensitivity index that MPCA and LGUs use to prioritize lakes for protection. Reached over 300 lake association and LGU professionals at workshops, trainings and presentations on this topic, including cost-benefit analysis. • Created an Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase webpage to highlight examples of enhanced water quality protection in local ordinances and presented it to 120 LGU staff. Worked with LGUs in 8 watersheds to incorporate higher water quality standards in local ordinances or land use plans. • Continued to evaluate potential sites for “floodplain culverts” at road/river crossings and quantify their environmental benefits. These specially designed culverts can improve watershed health and resiliency. Forest stewardship: Worked with landowners, Soil & Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 44 stewardship plans covering 6,842 acres of privately owned forestland in targeted subwatersheds of the Pine and Leech Lake major watersheds. Continued working with partners to develop landscape-level forest stewardship plans for selected watersheds. Other outreach and education: Reached over 1,000 local decision-makers, natural resource managers, youth and others in 32 presentations and trainings about watershed science in 24 watersheds. Organized a River Restoration conference that drew over 200 natural resource professionals. ",,,,848977,106081,,7.9,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2018,950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$950000 the first year and $950000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities.","Technical assistance to local implementation efforts: In FY18 DNR regional staff will continue helping local governments identify prioritize develop target design and implement clean water projects leading to more enduring water quality and other environmental benefits. Conservation planning assistance: DNR regional staff will participate in each of the 14 One watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects that will be active in FY18. This work will include actively participating in 1W1P advisory committee meetings providing DNR priorities to local governments and reviewing drafts of key sections of each plan under way. Where invited DNR staff will also continue using the Zonation conservation planning model to help communities identify water quality and water management priorities as part of 1W1P projects or community engagement in the development of watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS). Forest Stewardship Plans: In FY18 the DNR will continue to provide forest stewardship plans to landowners in targeted watersheds. Work will shift into the Pine River Watershed to leverage a grant from the U.S. Forest Service. Outreach & education: In FY18 DNR staff will continue educational and outreach efforts to enhance water managers’ and stakeholders’ understanding of watershed health the root causes of water quality problems and solutions that provide multiple benefits.","Technical assistance: In FY18 DNR helped local governments in 34 watersheds identify develop target design and/or implement water quality projects designed to provide enduring water quality and other environmental and economic benefits. Conservation planning: In FY18 DNR contributed to all 14 local comprehensive watershed management planning (One Watershed One Plan) projects that were active in FY18 by communicating DNR priorities serving on advisory committees and reviewing draft plans. In five projects we helped communities identify conservation priorities using the Zonation model – in the process helping partners see how to replicate the approach for potential use in other projects. We provided early input on 20 other local water planning efforts and 23 local land use planning efforts involving at least 16 watersheds. Six cities/counties used our updated shoreland model ordinance to adopt or amend shoreland ordinances with higher standards to better protect water quality. We took key steps to help permit applicants learn about environmentally beneficial “floodplain culverts” and continued advanced modeling to evaluate this optional practice. Forest stewardship: In FY18 DNR worked with landowners Soil & Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 14 forest stewardship plans covering 3 604 acres of private forestland in targeted watersheds as well as two landscape-level stewardship plans for Pine and Leech Lake River subwatersheds leveraging federal funds and other state funds to work with private landowners on forest stewardship. Outreach & education: In FY18 DNR delivered over 65 presentations on watershed science topics to more than 1 575 water managers land use planners engineers and others at local venues in at least 20 watersheds as well as larger regional and statewide venues.",,,,829695,104624,,7.4,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2017,1000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","(f) $1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities.","Technical assistance to local implementation efforts: DNR staff will continue helping local government units (LGUs) identify prioritize develop target design and implement clean water projects leading to more enduring water quality and other environmental benefits. Conservation planning assistance: We will join advisory committees for 7 new One watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects and comment on draft and final plans developed by LGUs in 5 1W1P pilot projects. We will continue using the Zonation conservation planning model to help communities identify water quality and water management priorities where invited by the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) or LGUs engaged in 1W1P or watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) efforts. Connecting water quality and land use: In two Upper Mississippi River Basin watersheds we will pilot tools to help LGUs and the MPCA incorporate local land use ordinance information and strategies in WRAPS reports and begin refining these tools for use in other watersheds. We will develop a webpage with ideas for updating local ordinances to include beyond-minimum standards for protecting water quality. We will complete and disseminate a fact sheet for permit applicants about designing culverts that protect floodplains. Forest Stewardship Plans: We will continue working with landowners Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs) and consultant foresters to write up to 30 stewardship plans covering an estimated 30 000 acres of forested land in targeted watersheds. This work may expand into the Pine and Kettle River watersheds. Outreach & education: We will continue educational and outreach efforts to enhance water managers’ and stakeholders’ understanding of aspects of watershed health. This will include presentations at small venues throughout the state as well as large statewide conferences.","Technical assistance to local implementation projects: In FY17 staff assisted local governments with more than 85 water quality projects in 28 watersheds. We helped target 35 projects in 18 major watersheds. This work leads to more lasting water quality results and other environmental outcomes. Conservation planning assistance: We provided early input on 39 local water planning efforts and 11 local land use planning efforts involving 37 watersheds. We participated in all 12 of the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects active that year; we reviewed plans for 4 of the 5 pilot projects provided input on the remaining pilot and communicated priorities to 7 new projects. In 5 watersheds where invited we led communities in identifying priorities using the Zonation conservation planning model. We updated the DNR Shoreland Model Ordinance with options that provide better water quality protection and disseminated this information to planners. Several counties are now exploring ordinance updates using the model. In 2 watersheds staff began testing a shoreland protection analysis tool to help identify opportunities to strengthen existing ordinances. We finalized and disseminated a package of information on “floodplain culverts ” an approach to infrastructure design at road-river crossings that takes stream stability and floodplain connectivity into account. Outreach & education: We gave about 30 presentations to over 800 water managers land use planners engineers and others. Venues ranged from local and regional meetings to large statewide conferences. Forest Stewardship Plans: Wed worked with landowners Soil and Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 43 forest stewardship plans covering 4 287 acres in targeted watersheds with lakes that are home to tullibee an important prey fish that requires cold clean water. We also targeted plans and project work to forested watersheds in parts of southeastern Minnesota.",,,,742515,100753,,6.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2016,1000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","(f) $1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities.","In FY16 DNR staff will continue to work with local governments to identify priority areas for targeting actions to protect and improve water quality including continuation/completion of the five One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) pilot projects. We will continue to use and adapt the Zonation model and associated surveys to create conservation priority maps for the following watersheds: Mississippi River-Headwaters and Cannon Rivers. DNR foresters will work with Soil and Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write stewardship plans for forested land in targeted watersheds including an expansion of tullibee lakes from new counties and more work on the Healthy Forests for Healthy Water project in southeast Minnesota.","Technical assistance to local implementation efforts: DNR staff assisted local governments (LGUs) with water quality projects in 49 watersheds. We helped design over 80 projects; identify prioritize or find funding or partners for potential projects in over 25 watersheds; target effective sites for over 35 projects; and improve water quality protection measures in local ordinances in 8 watersheds. This work leads to more enduring water quality and other environmental outcomes. Conservation planning assistance: We advised 5 One Watershed One Plan pilot projects supplying often substantial technical data on request. We led communities in using the Zonation conservation planning model to identify priorities in 3 watersheds where invited by LGUs or the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Connecting water quality and land use: We started developing several new products: Tools to help LGUs and the MPCA add local land use ordinance information and strategies to watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) reports; an inventory of local ordinances with beyond-minimum standards that protect water quality; a model ordinance that includes some of these higher standards; and a fact sheet for permit applicants about designing culverts that protect floodplains. Forest Stewardship Plans: We worked with landowners Soil and Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 42 forest stewardship plans covering 3 743 acres in targeted watersheds with lakes that are home to tullibee—an important prey fish that needs cold clean water to survive. We also targeted plans to forested watersheds in parts of southeastern MN to improve water quality in streams and rivers. Outreach & education: We reached well over 800 water managers and stakeholders in educational presentations posters and newsletter articles on watershed health topics. Audiences at 35 or so presentations ranged from small groups in over 12 watersheds to large statewide conferences.",,,,674676,99317,,6.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2015,1000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities including water quality protection in forested watersheds. ","In FY15 staff will continue to help local governments identify target and design implementation projects to protect and restore water quality. Staff will also participate in One Watershed One Plan interagency core teams for pilot watershed projects. The 4-step zonation framework will be applied and adapted in additional watersheds including the Mississippi River –Winona Leech Lake River Middle Minnesota River and St. Louis River. We will also apply the framework in the Lake Superior- North watershed at the invitation of the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources as part of the One Watershed One Plan pilot projects in those watersheds. Staff will also continue to enhance local capacity by building understanding of watershed systems through presentations and workshops. DNR foresters will work with Soil and Water Conservation Districts and additional landowners to write stewardship plans for forested land in targeted watersheds.","In FY15 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. We participated in five One Watershed One Plan pilot programs (Red Lake River Root River Lake Superior North North Fork Crow River Yellow Medicine River and Root River. In each watershed one lead staff person (supported by the Clean Water Fund) served as the DNR’s main contact on the locally-led technical advisory team so that our agency’s participation was streamlined efficient and effective. We worked with local governments to help develop 58 project ideas that will provide water quality and other ecosystem benefits. We provided technical assistance with funding design or implementation on 79 specific water quality projects in 30 watersheds. The result is water quality projects that are selected located and designed for long-term sustainability. We also developed new model ordinances with higher standards for water quality and worked on approaches to identify priorities for protection of lakes and rivers. As part of this work with communities we gave 36 different presentations for local communities or groups to build their understanding of watersheds. In total 1175 people attended these presentations and workshops. DNR staff worked with local governments to identify priority areas for targeting actions to protect and improve water quality. We used Zonation a value-based model with surveys and a mapping exercise to produce priority maps for 5 watersheds. DNR foresters worked with landowners soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs) and consultant foresters to write 23 forest stewardship plans covering 3 058 acres in targeted watersheds of lakes that are home to tullibee an important prey fish that requires cold clean water to survive. We are also doing targeted forest stewardship in southeast Minnesota to improve water quality in streams and rivers. ",,,,915714,94779,,6.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2014,1000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities including water quality protection in forested watersheds. ","In FY14 DNR staff will continue to work with state agency partners and assist local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY13. ","In FY14 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection efforts enhancing locally led projects through expertise in hydrology geomorphology and biology. Field staff helped strategically target conservation for 68 project ideas that will yield water quality and other ecosystem benefits and provided technical assistance on funding design or implementation for 84 projects. The result is water quality projects selected sited and designed for long-term sustainability. For example DNR consulted with several local governments about a natural-channel approach to stream channel stabilization which lasts longer and enhances habitat more than traditional armoring of stream banks. Field staff also worked with 44 communities or groups to build understanding of watersheds and enhance capacity to address water quality challenges through presentations and workshops attended by over 1 120 people. Foresters worked with landowners and SWCDs to write 92 forest stewardship plans covering 10 141 acres in targeted watersheds – a dramatic increase in the number of plans in these watersheds which drain to sensitive lakes home to tullibee an important prey fish that requires cold clean water to survive. Forest stewardship plans increase landowners’ eligibility for land protection programs and improve forest health which is integral to protecting high quality lakes. Staff helped local governments identify priority areas for targeting actions to protect and improve water quality using a framework that includes Zonation a value-based model; surveys of hundreds of people to determine how much they value specific conservation features; and a peer-review mapping exercise to synthesize personal knowledge about water quality risks and vulnerabilities in specific locations. Priority area maps were produced for the Chippewa River Mississippi River-St. Cloud and Yellow Medicine River watersheds. ",,,,734146,69391,,6.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2013,1220000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY13 DNR staff will continue to work with state agency partners and assist local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. Field staff will promote strategies that benefit clean water as well as habitat and other ecosystem values through education technical help and partnership. This work will use natural resource information and conservation targeting tools to maximize conservation investments by matching the right strategies in the right places. DNR will be a partner in building local capacity so that local governments are supported in: better understanding watershed systems; incorporating watershed information and analysis into local water and watershed plans; and targeting designing funding and implementing clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR foresters and Soil and Water Conservation Districts will work with landowners in watersheds of sensitive lakes in 7 counties to: write 50 forest stewardship plans totaling 7 000 acres; and distribute $45 000 in cost share funding for private forest management activities. The result will be an increase in land eligible for enrollment in land protection programs and an increase in forest health which is integral to protecting high quality lakes.","In FY13 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. DNR brings expertise in hydrology geomorphology and biology that enhances local projects so that conservation investments give maximum water quality and ecosystem benefits. Field staff worked with local governments to strategically target conservation for 58 project ideas that will provide water quality and other ecosystem benefits and they provided technical assistance with funding design or implementation on 127 specific water quality projects. The result is water quality projects that are selected located and designed for long-term sustainability. For example DNR consulted with a number of local governments to use a natural channel design approach to stream channel stabilization projects; this type of project lasts longer and provides better habitat benefits than traditional armoring of stream banks. Field staff also worked with 32 communities or groups to build their understanding of watersheds and enhance their capacity through presentations and workshops that were attended by a total of over 1 150 people. DNR foresters worked with landowners and County Soil and Water Conservation Districts to write 59 forest stewardship plans covering 6 458 acres of forested land in targeted watersheds. This represents an 80% increase in the number of stewardship plans in the targeted watersheds which drain to sensitive lakes that are home to populations of tulibee an important fish that requires cold clean water to survive. The forest stewardship plans will increase eligibility for enrollment in land protection programs and result in an increase in forest health which is integral to protecting high quality lakes.",,,,570678,69821,,5.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2012,1220000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY 12 DNR will provide assistance to local governments shoreland and woodland owners on clean water restoration and protection issues. DNR will expand the number of people working to promote strategies that benefit clean water as well as habitat and other ecosystem values through education technical help and partnership. This work will use natural resource information and conservation targeting tools to maximize conservation investments by matching the right strategies in the right places. DNR will help local governments design get funding and implement clean water strategies. DNR Foresters will work with property owners in priority areas within the central lakes region to write stewardship plans and promote enrollment in land protection programs.","In FY12 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. DNR brings expertise in hydrology geomorphology and biology that enhances local projects so that conservation investments give maximum water quality and ecosystem benefits. Field staff worked with 18 local governments on strategically targeting conservation work for water quality and other ecosystem benefits and provided technical assistance with funding design or implementation on 48 individual water quality projects. The result is water quality projects that are selected located and designed for long-term sustainability. For example DNR consulted with a number of local governments to use a natural channel design approach to stream channel stabilization projects this type of project lasts longer and provides better habitat benefits than traditional armoring of stream banks. Field staff also worked with 24 communities or groups to build their understanding of watersheds and enhance their capacity through presentations and workshops that were attended by a total of over 850 people.",,,,276675,176489,,9.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2011,250000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","In FY11 DNR hydrologists will continue the workshops and implementation projects started in the south and east parts of the state in FY10. Fisheries staff in southwestern Minnesota will partner with the Blue Earth Soil and Water Conservation District and to promote aquatic habitat conservation practices with local landowners. DNR will also adapt the CD-Rom ""Restore Your Shore"" into a new interactive website to make this useful information accessible to a broader audience.","In FY11 hydrologists and fisheries staff worked with local governments and property owners on clean water restoration and protection issues in the south and east parts of the state: *Presented clean water strategies information at 9 workshops tours and other events including 6 ""Our Water Our Choices"" workshops led by DNR and attended by 93 people including local officials. *Participated in St. Croix MIDS (Minimal Impact Design Standards) pilot steering committee. This project will help cities establish policies and programs that will give them a path to compliance with and a method for calculating credits for certain state stormwater requirements. *Assisted with funding coordination design or installation of 10 restoration projects including 4 river restoration projects 2 raingardens one wetland restoration two native prairies and a high velocity fish barrier. *Adapted the CD-Rom ""Restore Your Shore"" to an internet-based application that allows users to interactively explore ways that shoreline property owners can create enhance or protect healthy shorelines for habitat and clean water. The website includes step by step instructions for shoreland restoration and an online interactive plant selection tool. * Worked with local governments to provide information guidance and technical assistance to landowners regarding conservation assistance easements and conservation projects. This work resulted in permanently protecting 348.8 acres of riparian land and floodplains through conservation easements. ",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2010,250000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","In FY10 DNR will provide assistance to local governments and shoreland owners on clean water restoration and protection issues. This work will be done primarily in two areas of the state. In the south DNR a hydrologist will lead the development and presentation of a workshop series ""Our Water Our Choices"" for citizens and local officials and work with local groups on clean water projects. In the St. Croix Basin a hydrologist will work partners and local communities to promote and implemement best management practices for clean water.","In FY10 DNR hydrologists provided assistance to local governments and shoreland owners on clean water restoration and protection issues: * Presented clean water strategies information at 22 workshops tours and other events including 10 ""Our Water Our Choices"" workshops led by DNR and attended by 257 people including local officials. * Worked with partners to design and install 3 raingardens to capture runoff and prevent downstream pollution. *Provided technical assistance and input to local partners on clean water strategies including agricultural best management practices and municipal stormwater infrastructure. * Worked with Crow Organization of Waters on two river restorations near Forest City and Hutchinson. * Coordinated and executed the High Island Lake drawdown in Sibley County with a collaborative of lake association local and federal partners. * Restored two lakeshore lots on Lake Jennie as part of a hands-on shoreline restoration workshop. * Developed and distributed informational materials about shorelines raingardens and agricultural best management practices.",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
33974,"Not a Stranger Here: Minnesota Communities Confront Homelessness",2016,10000,"Laws of Minnesota for 2011 Chapter 6, Article 4, Subdivision 5, Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants.","Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants. $5,250,000 the first year and $5,250,000 the second year are for history programs and projects operated or conducted by or through local, county, regional, or other historical or cultural organizations; or for activities to preserve significant historic and cultural resources.","Available upon request. Contact",,,,"Available upon request. Contact",10000,,"Heidi Johnson McAllister, Janine Wenholz, Lorrie Janatopolous, Kathy Sauve, Emily McGann, Julia Blaha, Henry Jimenez, Jennifer Weissman, Ho Nguyen, Justin Vorbach",0.00,"Minnesota Coalition for the Homeless","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To document in 16 oral history interviews the history of homelessness in Minnesota.",,,2015-09-01,2016-09-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Liz,Kuoppala,"Minnesota Coalition for the Homeless","2233 University Ave. W., #434","St. Paul",MN,55114,218-248-5963,,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/not-stranger-here-minnesota-communities-confront-homelessness,,"Minnesota Historical Society Governing Board: William R. Stoeri, President Missy S. Thompson, Vice President Ruth Huss, Vice President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary Dean M. Nelson, Treasurer Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Robert Bruininks Judith S. Corson D. Stephen Elliott Phyllis Rawls Goff William D. Green David R. Hakensen Ruth S. Huss Martha Kaemmer Dennis L. Lamkin David M. Larson Charles Mahar Dean M. Nelson Elizabeth M. Nordlie Dennis Nguyen Peter R. Reis Hussein Samatar Simon Stevens Susan Kenny Stevens William R. Stoeri Karen Wilson Thissen Missy Staples Thompson Eleanor Winston Ex-Officio: Mark Dayton, Governor Yvonne Prattner Solon Lieutenant Governor Mark Ritchie, Secretary of State Lori Swanson, Attorney General Rebecca Otto, State Auditor",,
32445,"Operating Support",2016,481282,"Laws of Minnesota 2015 Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 3","ACHF Arts Access","Serve as a catalyst for the creative expression of artists. Annual measures of success are included in the Walker’s online annual report. Acquisitions, commissions, residencies, and presentations across the disciplines along with public/press attention and tour venues are tracked. 2: Advance participation in the arts and active audience engagement. Annual measures of success are included in the Walker’s online annual report. Evaluation methods include attendance and participation tracking as well as audience surveys, studies, advisory groups, and community partnerships.","Serve as a catalyst for the creative expression of artists. Annual measures of success are included in the Walker's online annual report. Acquisitions, commissions, residencies, and presentations across the disciplines along with public/press attention and tour venues are tracked. 2: Advance participation in the arts and active audience engagement. Annual measures of success are included in the Walker's online annual report. Evaluation methods include attendance and participation tracking as well as audience surveys, studies, advisory groups, and community partnerships.",,24717149,"Other, local or private",25198431,,"Christopher Askew, Jan Breyer, John Christakos, James Dayton, Patrick J. Denzer, Andrew S. Duff, Sima Griffith, Julie Guggemos, Nina Hale, Karen Heithoff, Ben Hirst, Andrew Humphrey, Matthew Knopf, Bill Jonason, Anne Labovitz, Muffy MacMillan, Alfredo Martel, Jennifer Martin, Aedie McEvoy, Jim Murphy, Dave Moore, Jr., Monica Nassif, Dick Payne, Michael Peterman, Patrick Peyton, Dean Phillips, Brian Pietsch, Donna Pohlad, Rebecca Pohlad, Teresa Rasmussen, Elizabeth G. Redleaf, Peter Remes, Joel Ronning, Lynn Carlson Schell, Jesse Singh, Greg Stenmoe, Wim Stocks, Carol Surface, Laura Taft, Greta Warren, Susan White, Tom Wicka, Audrey Wilf, D. Ellen Wilson, John P. Whaley, Wayne Zink",,"Walker Art Center","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Operating Support",,"General operating support",2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Marla,Stack,"Walker Art Center","1750 Hennepin Ave",Minneapolis,MN,55403-2115,"(612) 375-7640 ",marla.stack@walkerart.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota State Arts Board",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/operating-support-785,"Ardell Brede: Mayor of Rochester, elected 2002.; Peggy Burnet: Businesswoman, art collector, and community volunteer. Chair of the Nominating Committee, Smithsonian National Board. Trustee, Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Vice Chair, Minnesota State Arts Board.; Michael Charron: Dean of the School of the Arts, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota. Chair, Minnesota State Arts Board.; Rebecca Davis-Lee: Touring pianist, piano and music theory teacher; Wendy Dayton: Arts and community leader and philanthropist.; Sean Dowse, Executive director, Sheldon Theatre. Board member for Minnesota Music Coalition, Minnesota Citizens for the Arts, and Anderson Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Treasurer, Minnesota State Arts Board.; David Glenn: Executive director of the Minnesota Project, ceramic artist; Thomas Moss: Consultant to nonprofits and government agencies; Janice Sivertson: Gallery owner and visual artist","Ardell Brede: Mayor of Rochester, elected 2002.; Peggy Burnet: Businesswoman, art collector, and community volunteer. Chair of the Nominating Committee, Smithsonian National Board. Trustee, Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden. Vice Chair, Minnesota State Arts Board.; Michael Charron: Dean of the School of the Arts, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota. Chair, Minnesota State Arts Board.; Rebecca Davis-Lee: Touring pianist, piano and music theory teacher; Wendy Dayton: Arts and community leader and philanthropist.; Sean Dowse, Executive director, Sheldon Theatre. Board member for Minnesota Music Coalition, Minnesota Citizens for the Arts, and Anderson Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Treasurer, Minnesota State Arts Board.; David Glenn: Executive director of the Minnesota Project, ceramic artist; Thomas Moss: Consultant to nonprofits and government agencies; Janice Sivertson: Gallery owner and visual artist","Executive director Sue Gens (651) 215-1600",1
34092,"Oral History Projects",2016,54385,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","At the completion of the project, we will add eight oral histories to the collection.",,,,,54385,4143,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.40,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Oral History office worked with MNHS's Inclusion and Community Engagement staff on an oral history project related to the History Center's 2015 exhibit Inspiring Beauty: 50 Years of Ebony Fashion Fair. Interviewer Mica Anders-Turner completed 10 interviews to complement the Inspiring Beauty exhibit.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/oral-history-projects,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2024,1667876,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2023,1304696,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","Outreach program to maximize media relations, marketing and promotion, web and social media, and multicultural outreach to help visitors know what to expect; better set visitor expectations for different facilities and experiences. • Signage specialist to develop a comprehensive, user-focused signage strategy and lead the implementation across the system. • Organize digital assets, especially DEI photos, to ensure efficient use. Update legacy digital assets to ensure electronic accessibility for the public.   • Advance Customer Journey mapping and engagement with under-represented communities.   • Build key partnerships with urban and BIPOC audiences--introducing the statewide system to urbanites.   • Provide self-service interpretation at rustic, core and destination parks and trail units. Provide guest speakers at destination and select core parks.   • Wayfinding signage improvement to create a welcoming environment for ALL visitors.   • Promote experiences, programs and activities across diverse markets.   • Digital images of our system no longer reflect current conditions; panoramic, reservation system images, and virtual tours need refresh to stay relevant.   • Provide support for new partnership development program; statewide library program and enhanced volunteer program.   • Utilize non-peak times & locations to promote new programming for diverse audiences.   • Funding to cover about 50 class trips to parks for about 1,500 students who might not otherwise have the opportunity to visit state parks.   • Influencer pilot program to reach new audiences & share their PAT experiences with their own followers. • Focus on BIPOC influencers to reach diverse communities.  DEI Staff Training and Development.  DEI District Partnerships to build relationships with organizations and community leaders to better reach our target markets. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2022,1374490,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2021,1337154,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2020,1046346,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2019,746301,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2018,646133,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In FY 2018 four touch-screen kiosks provide multi-lingual information about Minnesota state parks state trails and water recreation opportunities. Two kiosks are permanently installed at the Minnesota Zoo and Midtown Global Market. The other two rotate to high-traffic areas frequented by families. Currently they are located at the Rondo Community Center and at the Duluth Library. New monitors were installed and all of the content was updated in 2017. Based on historical use patterns we expect at least 16 000 unique visits at the four kiosk locations in FY18. Two of the original six touch-screen kiosks purchased in 2010 have been retired/recycled due to their age and the cost to update/maintain them.","Pending program information.",,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2017,1023887,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","New in FY 2017 a kiosk has been set up at Highland Park Community Center and kiosks are expected to be set up soon at the Edgewater Hotel and Waterpark in Duluth as well as at a hospital in the Twin Cities area. Based on historical use patterns we expect at least 24 000 unique visits at these six locations in FY17. ","DNR kiosks recorded a total of 24 704 unique visits in FY 2017 exceeding the goal of 24 000. There have been more than 210 500 unique visits to the kiosks since 2010 with total pages views totaling more than 2.6 million. Kiosk locations in FY 2017 included •Highland Park Community Center •Edgewater Hotel (Duluth) •Fort Snelling State Park •Maplewood Community Center •Battle Creek Community Center •the Duluth Zoo •the Minnesota History Center •REI store (Roseville) •Midtown Global Market •and the Minnesota Zoo. Languages offered besides English included Hmong Russian Somali Spanish and Vietnamese with Spanish being the most requested. ",,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2016,625101,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","New in FY 2016 a kiosk has been set up at Arlington Hills Community Center (in St. Paul) Battle Creek Community Center the Minnesota History Center the Duluth Zoo and the Rochester Children’s Museum. Kiosks remain at Midtown Global Market (Minneapolis) and the Minnesota Zoo. Based on historical use patterns we expect at least 24 000 unique visits at these six location in FY16.","DNR kiosks recorded a total of 29 685 unique visits in FY 2016 up from 28 162 in FY2015 and in excess of the 24 000 goal. Total visits to the kiosks since the first one was installed now top 190 000 with total pages views totaling nearly 2.5 million. Kiosk locations in FY 2016 included Arlington Hills Community Center (in St. Paul) Battle Creek Community Center Cabela’s (Woodbury) the Rochester Children’s Museum the Duluth Zoo Midtown Global Market the Minnesota History Center the New Brighton Community Center Oxford Community Center (in St. Paul) REI store (Roseville) and the Minnesota Zoo. Languages offered besides English included Hmong Russian Somali Spanish and Vietnamese with Spanish being the most requested. ",,,,625101,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2015,742255,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","New locations in FY 2015 have included Maplewood Community Center Oxford Community Center (in St. Paul) and Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota. We did not move the kiosks to any special event this year because the benefit did not seem to outweigh the moving cost (about $300 roundtrip)., The Minnesota State Parks Research Report 2012 shows that Minnesotans want and need vital information so they can better use and enjoy Minnesota state parks (and trails). Connection plans proactively reach people to provide this information. This is especially important in reaching people who are not yet familiar with Minnesota State Parks and Trails. ","DNR kiosks recorded a total of 28 162 unique visits at six locations in excess of the 24 000 goal. Total visits to the kiosks since the first one was installed now top 150 000. New kiosk locations in FY 2015 included Maplewood Community Center Oxford Community Center (in St. Paul) Coffman Memorial Union at the University of Minnesota and New Brighton Community Center. Languages offered besides English included Hmong Russian Somali Spanish and Vietnamese with Spanish being the most requested. , Two connection plans were executed during this time period resulting in Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages being seen/heard 8 807 055 times (each representing a gross impression). The 2014 Minnesota State Parks and Trails Feel the Wow of Fall campaign was highly successful resulting in an increase in visitors as measured by sales of the Minnesota State Parks one-day and year-round permits and occupancy rates during September/October (combined). The Minnesota State Parks Gift Card - Holidays Campaigns 2014 promoted outdoor recreation through increased sales of the Minnesota State Parks gift card for the holiday season. The number of impressions does not include the Minnesota State Parks and Trails For Real Campaign 2015 (advertising interpretive/naturalist programs) as much of it occurred in Fiscal Year 2016. Many impressions cannot be measured for example commercials that stream on radio stations’ websites or other websites. There aren’t reporting services that measure these. ",,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2014,760000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","Two new kiosk locations were added in FY 2014: the new Cabela's store in Woodbury and the REI store in Bloomington. Kiosks were also located at Midtown Global Market Rosedale and the Minnesota Zoo. The kiosk also traveled to two special events: the Minnesota State Fair in August and to the Outdoor Adventure Expo at Midwest Mountaineering in November., Minnesota State Parks and Trails is currently in the early implementation stage for connections plans for 2014. ","Now that the novelty of the kiosks is wearing off and we are into our fourth year of seeking host locations we are not getting as much traffic at each kiosk as we did initially. We have been adding brochure racks to the kiosks as we move them around though so they have helped us get brochures into people's hands right at the kiosk rather than requiring them to request the publications via mail or email. Rosedale has been a particularly good location for distributing publications., 10.5 million total advertising impressions have been made in the first half of FY14",,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2013,545000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","New kiosk locations in FY 2013 included 3M and Hennepin County Service Center while kiosks remained in place at the Minnesota Zoo Midtown Global Market Brookdale Library and Rosedale. Based on traffic patterns the previous year we stuck with our goal of logging 3 000 unique visits per month or a total of 36 000 unique visits for the year.","Kiosk use at 3M and Hennepin County Service Center was less than anticipated (double digits rather than triple digits each month) and the kiosks logged 29 061 unique visits during the year short of the 36 000 goal. We will continue to move the kiosks around in an effort to reach new people in new locations.",,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2012,545000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(1)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","Based on the popularity of the kiosks the first year we set a goal of reaching 3 000 new people (or logging at least 3 000 “unique visits”) per month in year two. Locations for the kiosks between July 2011 and June 2012 included the Minnesota Zoo the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (baggage claim area) the Mall of America (near the north entrance to the amusement park) Rosedale Center (food court area) Midtown Global Market—and new in FY 2012—Maple Grove Community Center Shoreview Community Center Brookdale Library and the Hartford. , The Minnesota State Parks Research Report 2007 shows that Minnesotans want and need vital information so they can better use and enjoy Minnesota state parks (and trails). Connection plans proactively reach people to provide this information. This is especially important in reaching people who are not yet familiar with Minnesota State Parks and Trails. ","In FY 2012 alone there were 42 820 unique visits to the kiosks surpassing the goal by 12 820. From August 2010 through June 2012 the kiosks cumulatively logged 69 122 “unique visits” and more than a million page views., Six connection plans were executed during this time period producing 13 385 053 gross impressions (number of times the message was seen/heard). ",,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2011,775000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2 (1)",,"The first kiosk was installed in August 2010 at the IDS Crystal Court. Subsequently kiosks were also installed at the Minnesota Zoo the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (baggage claim area) the Mall of America (near the north entrance to the amusement park) Rosedale Center (food court area) Midtown Global Market. A ""traveling"" kiosk made its debut at the 2010 Minnesota State Fair and then traveled to the Great Hall at the State Capitol. Our target the first year (FY 11) was to reach at least 10 000 new people that we were not currently reaching through existing communication channels. ","Through June 15 2011 the kiosks logged 30 064 “unique visits” (our proxy for “new people”) including more than 10 000 views of the pages in other languages (Spanish Hmong Somali Vietnamese and Russian).",,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
3213,"Outreach, public affairs and web",2010,600000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2 (1)",,"Our goal is to create six accessible multi-lingual touch-screen kiosks that can reach visitors with information about Minnesota state parks and trails., Historically the Division of Parks and Trails had not been able to allocate resources to advertising. The Minnesota State Parks Research Report 2007 shows that Minnesotans want and need vital information so they can better use and enjoy Minnesota state parks (and trails). The goal of the connection plan was to deliver nineteen million impressions; in other words the message would be seen/heard nineteen million times. This goal of nineteen million impressions is a start toward proactively providing this information to motivate the target audience to participate in outdoor recreation. , Another initiative was to establish a new connection point with young children and their parents using a method of receiving information that was highly relevant to them: the Internet. The current DNR website has very little engaging age-appropriate content for young children and the new Minnesota State Parks and Trails kids’ website will break new ground for the agency., One hundred fourteen panoramic virtual tours. Each year an RFP will go to vendors to shoot and package a virtual tour for a specific state park state water trail or state trail. Because a virtual tour may convey multiple seasons and must include peak summer scenes each virtual tour contract typically spans two fiscal years with the contract finalized in one and the final product submitted in the next. ","We contracted with a Minnesota company to design and build the six touch-screen kiosks according to our specifications. None were installed yet by June 30 2010 (thus the quantity of 0 people reached)., Three campaigns were executed in Fiscal year 2010 producing 11 765 784 gross impressions. Results are being seen as witnessed by increased revenue Minnesota State Parks vehicle permit sales and program attendance. It's important to continue building upon this foundation to accomplish the goal of increasing participation in outdoor recreation. Eight campaigns executed in fiscal year 2011 produced 13 422 917 gross impressions. Results are being seen as witnessed by increased revenue Minnesota State Parks vehicle permit sales and program attendance. It's important to continue building upon this foundation to accomplish the goal of increasing participation in outdoor recreation. , A vendor was selected after an RFP process in FY10 and initial development and programming of the standalone Flash-based kids’ site has concluded. The site was in beta testing during the period of 01/01/11-06/30/11 and is expected to launch on the public DNR website during winter 2011. After the new site has been publicly announced we will begin measuring page views and other metrics to track its ongoing success., Twenty seven state parks have standardized virtual tours either posted or ready to post to the division’s website. Eight state parks have virtual tours currently under contract. ",,,,,,,,,,"The Division of Parks and Trails is engaged in critical work to connect people to the outdoors. As part of the work in this project area, the new touch-screen kiosk project will increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities at Minnesota state parks and trails among underrepresented groups by creating and installing accessible, touch-screen kiosks with information in multiple languages, in high-traffic, family-oriented locations. Connection plans deliver Minnesota State Parks and Trails' messages to new audiences. The Division of Parks and Trails establishes partnerships to maximize resources in building participation in outdoor recreation. The kids' interactive website creates interactive, age-appropriate content for children 5-11 years old, motivating children to get outdoors. The virtual tours project provides web visitors with an immersive experience, allowing them to view and hear park, trail, and water trail scenes from 360 degrees or video snippets...the next best thing to actually being there. ","The Division of Parks and Trails is working to increase awareness about outdoor recreation opportunities among groups currently underrepresented at state parks and trails (families with young children, people with disabilities, people whose primary language is not English). Instead of waiting for them to come to us for information (by visiting, calling or going to our website), we are going to them by placing eye-catching kiosks in high-traffic locations that they frequent. By enhancing our children's programming on the website, we are encouraging youth to develop a lifelong interest in and stewardship for state parks and state trails. (It's hard to say no to a child who asks to go to a park or to go camping.) People who are new to state parks or state trails often have a difficult time selecting which to visit and may not be aware of the features that make each park unique. Online virtual tours of each location act as trip planning visual aids, helping people select which park or trail they want to visit and establishing what to expect once they arrive. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Rachel,Hopper,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5578",rachel.hopper@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/outreach-public-affairs-and-web-0,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2024,100000,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(f)","$722,000 the first year and $645,000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department, the Metropolitan Council, and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2023,100000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$512000 the first year and $512000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee. ","The Minnesota DNR Parks and Trails will provide staff to support the ongoing efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee to champion the Legacy 25 Year Plan during FY23. Minnesota's Great Outdoors website (mn.gov/greatoutdoors) shares information reagarding all Legacy-eligible parks and trails of state and regional significance. FY23 will continue to see website maintenance,  evaluation and promotion of the site, as well consideration for upgrades and improvments to enhance its impact. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2022,100000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$512000 the first year and $512000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee. ","The Minnesota DNR Parks and Trails will provide staff to support the ongoing efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee to champion the Legacy 25 Year Plan during FY22. , Minnesota's Great Outdoors (mn.gov/greatoutdoors) the website of all Legacy-eligible parks and trails of state and regional significance launched in June 2018. FY22 will continue to see maintenance evaluation refinement and promotion of the site. ","In FY22, the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee worked with the convening agencies (MN DNR Parks and Trails, Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission and Metropolitan Council) to champion the vision of the 25 Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan, meeting six times throughout the year.  The Minnesota Great Outdoors website (mn.gov/greatoutdoors) was maintained and promoted as needed throughout FY22. ",,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2021,100000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$500000 the first year and $512000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.","Minnesota's Great Outdoors (mn.gov/greatoutdoors) the website of all Legacy-eligible parks and trails of state and regional significance launched in June 2018. FY21 will continue to see maintenance evaluation refinement and promotion of the site., The Minnesota DNR Parks and Trails will provide staff to support the ongoing efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee to champion the Legacy 25 Year Plan during FY21. ",", ",,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2020,100000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$500000 the first year and $512000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.","Minnesota's Great Outdoors (mn.gov/greatoutdoors) the website of all Legacy-eligible parks and trails of state and regional significance launched in June 2018. FY20 will continue to see maintenance evaluation refinement and promotion of the site., The Minnesota DNR Parks and Trails will provide staff to support the ongoing efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee to champion the Legacy 25 Year Plan during FY20. Specifically in FY20 the Advisory Committee in partnership with DNR Metropolitan Council and Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission will launch a popup kit to be used around the state to share information about the Parks and Trails Legacy Fund with the public. Moreover the DNR Metropolitan Council and Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission will renegotiate the distribution formula of Parks and Trails Legacy Fund dollars through a Funding Work Group. The Funding Work Group will make a funding distribution recommendation to the Legislature by June 2020. Additional assistance to the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee is provided by a Conservation Corps individual placement specialist. ",", ",,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2019,150000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$521000 the first year and $548000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced Web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.","Minnesota's Great Outdoors (mn.gov/greatoutdoors) the website of all Legacy-eligible parks and trails of state and regional significance launched in June 2018. FY19 will see maintenance evaluation and refinement of the site., Minnesota DNR Parks and Trails Metropolitan Council and Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission will continue to cooperate with other partners on developing a website providing the public with access to integrated information on parks and trails of statewide and regional significance. The Minnesota DNR Parks and Trails will provide staff to support the efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee during FY19. Specifically in FY18 the Advisory Committee in partnership with DNR Metropolitan Council and Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission will release the final report summarizing the 10th Anniversary of Legacy regional events held during 2018. ","The Minnesota Great Outdoors website (mn.gov/greatoutdoors) was maintained and promoted as needed throughout FY19. , In FY19 the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee worked with the convening agencies (MN DNR Parks and Trails Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission and Metropolitan Council) to champion the vision of the 25 Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan meeting six times throughout the year. Additionally the committee supported an exhibit at the Minnesota State Fair where fairgoers could learn about the Parks and Trails Legacy Fund and the projects the fund has supported. ",,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2018,150000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$521000 the first year and $548000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced Web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.","The Minnesota DNR Parks and Trails will provide staff to support the ongoing efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee to champion the Legacy 25 Year Plan during FY18. Specifically in FY18 the Advisory Committee in partnership with DNR Metropolitan Council and Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission are holding a series of eight (8) regional events around the state between January and June 2018 on the theme ""What's Your Legacy?"". The purpose of the events is to (1) celebrate the 10th Anniversary of the passage of the Legacy Amendment; (2) provide information and education about what the Legacy Amendment is and what has been accomplished; and (3) gather input from those attending on their views of how to best move forward with Legacy investments in the future. Additional assistance is provided by a Conservation Corps individual placement specialist whose specialty is youth outreach., The website of all Legacy-eligible parks and trails of state and regional significance launched a beta site in FY18 and conducted additional usability testing with members of the public. Public launch of the site is expected toward the end of FY18.","In FY18 the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee worked with the convening agencies (MN DNR Parks and Trails Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission and Metropolitan Council) to champion the vision of the 25 Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Specifically the Advisory Committee planned and held a series of regional public events for FY18 to celebrate and educate about Legacy and to gather input from the public. The events provided information on funded Legacy projects that supplement and provide context for the regular Legacy reporting at the Legislative Coordinating Commission website (where you are reading this text). A report summarizing the activities and findings of the events will be published in FY19. The website of all Legacy-eligible parks and trails of state and regional significance was launched in FY18 (June 2018). Please visit the site use it and provide feedback there (mn.gov/greatoutdoors)!, The website of all Legacy-eligible parks and trails of state and regional significance was launched in FY18 (June 2018). Please visit the site use it and provide feedback there (mn.gov/greatoutdoors)!",,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2017,200000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$536000 the first year and $555000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced Web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee. Of this amount $260000 the first year shall be used for a grant to the University of Minnesota Center for Changing Landscapes to complete a legacy tracking project and to implement a survey on use patterns user needs and perceptions related to parks and trails in Minnesota. The tracking project and survey work must be done in collaboration with the Department of Natural Resources Metropolitan Council and Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission.","MN DNR Met Council and Greater MN will continue to cooperate with other partners on developing a website providing the public with access to integrated information on parks and trails of statewide and regional significance., The MN DNR will provide staff to support the efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee during FY17. Additional assistance is provided by a Conservation Corps individual placement specialist whose specialty is youth outreach.","The website of all Legacy-eligible parks and trails of state and regional significance made major strides forward in FY17 with the development of a working prototype usability testing with members of the public and ongoing gathering of data from many disparate sources to form a seamless whole. The site will launch in FY18., In FY17 the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee worked with the convening agencies (MN DNR Parks and Trails Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission and Metropolitan Council) to champion the vision of the 25 Year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan. Specifically the Advisory Committee led the effort to review the progress of the agencies in advancing the vision of the 25 Year Plan. The committee then began planning a series of regional public events for FY18 to celebrate and educate about Legacy and to gather input from the public. Additionally the committee worked with the agencies to plan a new annual Shared Outcomes Report to supplement and provide context for the regular Legacy reporting at the Legislative Coordinating Commission website (where you are reading this text).",,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2016,226000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(e)","$536000 the first year and $555000 the second year are for coordination and projects between the department the Metropolitan Council and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission; enhanced Web-based information for park and trail users; and support of activities of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee. Of this amount $260000 the first year shall be used for a grant to the University of Minnesota Center for Changing Landscapes to complete a legacy tracking project and to implement a survey on use patterns user needs and perceptions related to parks and trails in Minnesota. The tracking project and survey work must be done in collaboration with the Department of Natural Resources Metropolitan Council and Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission.","MN DNR Met Council and Greater MN will cooperate on developing a website providing the public with access to integrated information on parks and trails of statewide and regional significance., The MN DNR will provide staff to support the efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee during FY16. Additional assistance is provided by a Conservation Corps individual placement specialist whose specialty is youth outreach.","MN DNR Met Council and Greater MN cooperated with Explore Minnesota Tourism on developing a website providing the public with access to integrated information on parks and trails of statewide and regional significance. In F16 a contract with the Minnesota Geospatial Information Office (MNGeo) was executed and work progressed. The site is expected to launch at the end of FY17., The MN DNR successfully provided staff to support the efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee during FY16. Additional assistance was provided by a Conservation Corps individual placement specialist whose specialty is youth outreach.",,,,226000,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2015,104000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(d)","$200000 the first year and $207000 the second year are for enhanced integrated and accessible Web-based information for park and trail users; joint marketing and promotional efforts for all parks and trails of regional or statewide significance; and support of activities of a parks and trails legacy advisory committee. Of this amount $100000 the first year and $103000 the second year are for Greater Minnesota Parks and Trails Commission capacity building","The MN DNR is directed to support the efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.","Supported by DNR staff The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee (LAC) met every other month during FY15 and continue to make progress to coordinate among partners including DNR Metropolitan Council and implementing agencies and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. Current Legacy Advisory Committee efforts include continuing focus on measuring progress toward the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan involving youth and young adults (12-24 years of age) and developing an integrated website to enhance outdoor recreation access to Minnesota citizens.",,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2014,100000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(d)","$200000 the first year and $207000 the second year are for enhanced integrated and accessible Web-based information for park and trail users; joint marketing and promotional efforts for all parks and trails of regional or statewide significance; and support of activities of a parks and trails legacy advisory committee. Of this amount $100000 the first year and $103000 the second year are for Greater Minnesota Parks and Trails Commission capacity building","The MN DNR is directed to support the efforts of the Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee.","Supported by DNR staff The Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee (LAC) met every other month during FY14 and continue to make great progress to coordinate among partners including DNR Metropolitan Council and Greater Minnesota. Current Legacy Advisory Committee efforts include a focus on measuring progress toward the 25-year Parks and Trails Legacy Plan involving youth and young adults (12-24 years of age) and developing a website to enhance communications with Minnesota citizens. The LAC also supports ongoing work among DNR Metropolitan Council and implementing agencies and the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to develop user-friendly web-based information for park and trail users. ",,,,90000,10000,,0.08,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2013,185000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(4)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
18218,"Parks and Trails Legacy Advisory Committee and Integrated Website",2012,185000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(4)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","The 17 member advisory committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater a MN Regional Parks and Trails Commission. ","The 17-member Advisory Committee meets every other month. The group has begun work on promoting and coordinating implementation of the Parks and Trails Legacy Plan and assessing progress towards achievement of the five year priorities in the Legacy Plan. ",,,,,,,,,,"The 17 member Park and Trail Legacy Advisory Committee is appointed by the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council and the Chair of the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission. The mission of the committee is to champion the 25 year ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" by providing recommendations to enhance promotion, coordination, and accountability throughout implementation of the plan. The integrated website will provide the public with a seamless gateway to information about the offerings of the many providers of outdoor recreation in the state of Minnesota at regional and state scales. ","The ""Parks and Trails Legacy Plan"" recommended formation of an advisory committee to encourage the coordinated development of a network of regional and state parks and trails. The plan also recommended that the committee promote and monitor the implementation of the Legacy Plan. ",,2011-07-25,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Laura,Preus,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5639",laura.preus@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-advisory-committee-and-integrated-website,,,,
32164,"Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program - GMRPTC managed",2024,14286000,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(c)","$14,286,000 the first year and $12,762,000 the second year are for grants for parks and trails of regional significance outside the seven-county metropolitan area under Minnesota Statutes, section 85.535. The grants awarded under this paragraph must be based on the lists of recommended projects submitted to the legislative committees under Minnesota Statutes, section 85.536, subdivision 10, from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission established under Minnesota Statutes, section 85.536. Grants funded under this paragraph must support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance that meet the applicable definitions and criteria for regional parks and trails contained in the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Strategic Plan adopted by the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission on April 22, 2015. Grant recipients identified under this paragraph must submit a grant application to the commissioner of natural resources. Up to 2.5 percent of the appropriation may be used by the commissioner for the actual cost of issuing and monitoring the grants for the commission. Of the amount appropriated, $475,000 the first year and $475,000 the second year are for the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to carry out its duties under Minnesota Statutes, section 85.536, including the continued development of a statewide system plan for regional parks and trails outside the seven-county metropolitan area. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"To provide grants to local units of government to support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Funding for this grant program is from the Parks and Trails Fund created by the Minnesota Legislature from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment passed by the voters in 2008. Beginning July 1, 2015 (fiscal year 2016), the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (GMRPTC) assumed management of reviewing and awarding these grants. That is, they became 'pass-through' grants with DNR staff providing administrative support to GMRPTC only. ",,,2015-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Audrey,Mularie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5549",audrey.mularie@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-grant-program-gmrptc-managed,,,,
32164,"Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program - GMRPTC managed",2023,11074000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(b)","$10857000 the first year and $11074000 the second year are for grants for parks and trails of regional significance outside the seven-county metropolitan area under Minnesota Statutes section 85.535. The grants awarded under this paragraph must be based on the lists of recommended projects submitted to the legislative committees under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 subdivision 10 from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission established under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536. Grants funded under this paragraph must support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance that meet the applicable definitions and criteria for regional parks and trails contained in the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Strategic Plan adopted by the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission on April 22 2015. Grant recipients identified under this paragraph must submit a grant application to the commissioner of natural resources. Up to 2.5 percent of the appropriation may be used by the commissioner for the actual cost of issuing and monitoring the grants for the commission. Of the amount appropriated $456000 the first year and $456000 the second year are for the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to carry out its duties under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 including the continued development of a statewide system plan for regional parks and trails outside the seven-county metropolitan area. ","In FY23, GMRPTC grants to implementing park and trail agencies will result in 440 acres or regional park acquisition, 25.8 miles of new trail development, 4.8 miles of trails improved, 25 trail bridges/culverts developed or restored and 1 new trailhead facility developed. ",,,,,,,,,,,"To provide grants to local units of government to support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Funding for this grant program is from the Parks and Trails Fund created by the Minnesota Legislature from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment passed by the voters in 2008. Beginning July 1, 2015 (fiscal year 2016), the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (GMRPTC) assumed management of reviewing and awarding these grants. That is, they became 'pass-through' grants with DNR staff providing administrative support to GMRPTC only. ",,,2015-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Audrey,Mularie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5549",audrey.mularie@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-grant-program-gmrptc-managed,,,,
32164,"Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program - GMRPTC managed",2022,10857000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(b)","$10857000 the first year and $11074000 the second year are for grants for parks and trails of regional significance outside the seven-county metropolitan area under Minnesota Statutes section 85.535. The grants awarded under this paragraph must be based on the lists of recommended projects submitted to the legislative committees under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 subdivision 10 from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission established under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536. Grants funded under this paragraph must support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance that meet the applicable definitions and criteria for regional parks and trails contained in the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Strategic Plan adopted by the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission on April 22 2015. Grant recipients identified under this paragraph must submit a grant application to the commissioner of natural resources. Up to 2.5 percent of the appropriation may be used by the commissioner for the actual cost of issuing and monitoring the grants for the commission. Of the amount appropriated $456000 the first year and $456000 the second year are for the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to carry out its duties under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 including the continued development of a statewide system plan for regional parks and trails outside the seven-county metropolitan area. ",,"GMRPTC received 17 eligible funding applications and recommend $11,398,765 in awards to 14 applicants. The year was very productive including (3) three additional mountain bike trail system usage surveys, (7) seven campground visitor satisfaction and occupancy surveys, the completion of the Mountain Bike Trail Development Guidelines, (7) seven new designated facilities, and a special grant cycle for track wheel chairs. ",,,,,,,,,,"To provide grants to local units of government to support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Funding for this grant program is from the Parks and Trails Fund created by the Minnesota Legislature from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment passed by the voters in 2008. Beginning July 1, 2015 (fiscal year 2016), the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (GMRPTC) assumed management of reviewing and awarding these grants. That is, they became 'pass-through' grants with DNR staff providing administrative support to GMRPTC only. ",,,2015-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Audrey,Mularie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5549",audrey.mularie@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-grant-program-gmrptc-managed,,,,
32164,"Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program - GMRPTC managed",2021,10139000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(b)","$9910000 the first year and $10139000 the second year are for grants for parks and trails of regional significance outside the seven-county metropolitan area under Minnesota Statutes section 85.535. The grants awarded under this paragraph must be based on the lists of recommended projects submitted to the legislative committees under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 subdivision 10 from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission established under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536. Grants funded under this paragraph must support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance that meet the applicable definitions and criteria for regional parks and trails contained in the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Strategic Plan adopted by the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission on April 22 2015. Grant recipients identified under this paragraph must submit a grant application to the commissioner of natural resources. Up to 2.5 percent of the appropriation may be used by the commissioner for the actual cost of issuing and monitoring the grants for the commission. Of the amount appropriated $446000 the first year and $456000 the second year are for the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to carry out its duties under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 including the continued development of a statewide system plan for regional parks and trails outside the seven-county metropolitan area.",,,,,,,,,,,,"To provide grants to local units of government to support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Funding for this grant program is from the Parks and Trails Fund created by the Minnesota Legislature from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment passed by the voters in 2008. Beginning July 1, 2015 (fiscal year 2016), the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (GMRPTC) assumed management of reviewing and awarding these grants. That is, they became 'pass-through' grants with DNR staff providing administrative support to GMRPTC only. ",,,2015-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Audrey,Mularie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5549",audrey.mularie@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-grant-program-gmrptc-managed,,,,
32164,"Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program - GMRPTC managed",2020,9910000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(b)","$9910000 the first year and $10139000 the second year are for grants for parks and trails of regional significance outside the seven-county metropolitan area under Minnesota Statutes section 85.535. The grants awarded under this paragraph must be based on the lists of recommended projects submitted to the legislative committees under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 subdivision 10 from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission established under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536. Grants funded under this paragraph must support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance that meet the applicable definitions and criteria for regional parks and trails contained in the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Strategic Plan adopted by the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission on April 22 2015. Grant recipients identified under this paragraph must submit a grant application to the commissioner of natural resources. Up to 2.5 percent of the appropriation may be used by the commissioner for the actual cost of issuing and monitoring the grants for the commission. Of the amount appropriated $446000 the first year and $456000 the second year are for the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to carry out its duties under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 including the continued development of a statewide system plan for regional parks and trails outside the seven-county metropolitan area.","25.5 miles of existing trail are planned to be restored or improved. , The target is to develop 9.2 new miles of trail. , Two plans are targeted for development in this period.",", , ",,,,,,,,,,"To provide grants to local units of government to support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Funding for this grant program is from the Parks and Trails Fund created by the Minnesota Legislature from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment passed by the voters in 2008. Beginning July 1, 2015 (fiscal year 2016), the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (GMRPTC) assumed management of reviewing and awarding these grants. That is, they became 'pass-through' grants with DNR staff providing administrative support to GMRPTC only. ",,,2015-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Audrey,Mularie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5549",audrey.mularie@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-grant-program-gmrptc-managed,,,,
32164,"Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program - GMRPTC managed",2019,9445000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(b)","$8293000 the first year and $9445000 the second year are for grants for parks and trails of regional significance outside the seven-county metropolitan area under Minnesota Statutes section 85.535. The grants awarded under this paragraph shall be based on the lists of recommended projects submitted to the legislative committees under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 subdivision 10 from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission established under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536. Grants funded under this paragraph must support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance that meet the applicable definitions and criteria for regional parks and trails contained in the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Strategic Plan adopted by the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission on April 22 2015. Grant recipients identified under this paragraph must submit a grant application to the commissioner of natural resources. Up to 2.5 percent of the appropriation may be used by the commissioner for the actual cost of issuing and monitoring the grants for the commission. Of the amount appropriated $424000 the first year and $399000 the second year are for the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to carry out its duties under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 including the continued development of a statewide system plan for regional parks and trails outside the seven-county metropolitan area.","Eight (8) parks are targeted for development or restoration., The target is to develop 22.63 new miles of trail. ","Parks developed or rehabilitated: Grant recipients have up to three (3) years to complete their work. If a project receives federal funding the time period of the grant is extended to equal the availability of the federal funding. Measurable outcomes will be reported once all grants originating from fiscal year 2019 are closed., ",,,,,,,,,,"To provide grants to local units of government to support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Funding for this grant program is from the Parks and Trails Fund created by the Minnesota Legislature from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment passed by the voters in 2008. Beginning July 1, 2015 (fiscal year 2016), the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (GMRPTC) assumed management of reviewing and awarding these grants. That is, they became 'pass-through' grants with DNR staff providing administrative support to GMRPTC only. ",,,2015-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Audrey,Mularie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5549",audrey.mularie@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-grant-program-gmrptc-managed,,,,
32164,"Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program - GMRPTC managed",2018,8293000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(b)","$8293000 the first year and $9445000 the second year are for grants for parks and trails of regional significance outside the seven-county metropolitan area under Minnesota Statutes section 85.535. The grants awarded under this paragraph shall be based on the lists of recommended projects submitted to the legislative committees under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 subdivision 10 from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission established under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536. Grants funded under this paragraph must support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance that meet the applicable definitions and criteria for regional parks and trails contained in the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Strategic Plan adopted by the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission on April 22 2015. Grant recipients identified under this paragraph must submit a grant application to the commissioner of natural resources. Up to 2.5 percent of the appropriation may be used by the commissioner for the actual cost of issuing and monitoring the grants for the commission. Of the amount appropriated $424000 the first year and $399000 the second year are for the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to carry out its duties under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 including the continued development of a statewide system plan for regional parks and trails outside the seven-county metropolitan area.","The target is to develop 28.2 new miles of trail. Five projects., Six (6) parks are targeted for development or restoration.","New trail developed or created: Grant recipients have up to 3 years to complete their work. If a project receives federal funding the time period of the grant is extended to equal the availability of the federal funding. Measurable outcomes will be reported once all grants originating from fiscal year 2018 are closed., Parks developed or rehabilitated: Grant recipients have up to three (3) years to complete their work. If a project receives federal funding the time period of the grant is extended to equal the availability of the federal funding. Measurable outcomes will be reported once all grants originating from fiscal year 2018 are closed.",,,,,207325,,,,,"To provide grants to local units of government to support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Funding for this grant program is from the Parks and Trails Fund created by the Minnesota Legislature from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment passed by the voters in 2008. Beginning July 1, 2015 (fiscal year 2016), the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (GMRPTC) assumed management of reviewing and awarding these grants. That is, they became 'pass-through' grants with DNR staff providing administrative support to GMRPTC only. ",,,2015-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Audrey,Mularie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5549",audrey.mularie@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-grant-program-gmrptc-managed,,,,
32164,"Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program - GMRPTC managed",2017,9033000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(b)","$8618000 the first year and $9033000 the second year are for grants for parks and trails of regional significance outside the seven-county metropolitan area under Minnesota Statutes section 85.535. The grants must be based on the recommendations to the commissioner from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission established under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536. The second year appropriation in this paragraph includes money for: a grant to the St. Louis and Lake Counties Regional Railroad Authority to design engineer acquire right-of-way and construct a segment of the Mesabi Trail from Embarrass to near the intersection of County Road 26 Whalston Road and Trunk Highway 135 toward Tower; and up to $400000 for a grant to the city of La Crescent to design engineer acquire right-of-way and construct a segment of the Wagon Wheel Trail. Grants funded under this paragraph must support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance that meet the applicable definitions and criteria for regional parks and trails contained in the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Strategic Plan adopted by the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission on April 22 2015. Grant recipients identified under this paragraph must submit a grant application to the commissioner of natural resources. Up to 2.5 percent of the appropriation may be used by the commissioner for the actual cost of issuing and monitoring the grants for the commission. Of the amount appropriated $356000 in fiscal year 2016 and $362000 in fiscal year 2017 are for the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to carry out its duties under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 including the continued development of a statewide system plan for regional parks and trails outside the seven-county metropolitan area.","The target is to develop or create 14.45 miles of new trail., The target is to develop or rehabilitate 6 parks., The target is to acquire 10.25 miles of trail.","New trail developed or created: Grant recipients have up to 3 years to complete their work. If a project receives federal funding the time period of the grant is extended to equal the availability of the federal funding. Measurable outcomes will be reported once all grants originating from fiscal year 2017 are closed., Parks developed or rehabilitated: Grant recipients have up to three (3) years to complete their work. If a project receives federal funding the time period of the grant is extended to equal the availability of the federal funding. Measurable outcomes will be reported once all grants originating from fiscal year 2017 are closed., Miles of trail acquired: Grant recipients have up to 3 years to complete their work. If a project receives federal funding the time period of the grant is extended to equal the availability of the federal funding. Measurable outcomes will be reported once all grants originating from fiscal year 2017 are closed.",,,,,225825,,,,,"To provide grants to local units of government to support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Funding for this grant program is from the Parks and Trails Fund created by the Minnesota Legislature from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment passed by the voters in 2008. Beginning July 1, 2015 (fiscal year 2016), the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (GMRPTC) assumed management of reviewing and awarding these grants. That is, they became 'pass-through' grants with DNR staff providing administrative support to GMRPTC only. ",,,2015-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Audrey,Mularie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5549",audrey.mularie@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-grant-program-gmrptc-managed,,,,
32164,"Parks and Trails Legacy Grant Program - GMRPTC managed",2016,8618000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(b)","$8618000 the first year and $9033000 the second year are for grants for parks and trails of regional significance outside the seven-county metropolitan area under Minnesota Statutes section 85.535. The grants must be based on the recommendations to the commissioner from the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission established under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536. The second year appropriation in this paragraph includes money for: a grant to the St. Louis and Lake Counties Regional Railroad Authority to design engineer acquire right-of-way and construct a segment of the Mesabi Trail from Embarrass to near the intersection of County Road 26 Whalston Road and Trunk Highway 135 toward Tower; and up to $400000 for a grant to the city of La Crescent to design engineer acquire right-of-way and construct a segment of the Wagon Wheel Trail. Grants funded under this paragraph must support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance that meet the applicable definitions and criteria for regional parks and trails contained in the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Strategic Plan adopted by the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission on April 22 2015. Grant recipients identified under this paragraph must submit a grant application to the commissioner of natural resources. Up to 2.5 percent of the appropriation may be used by the commissioner for the actual cost of issuing and monitoring the grants for the commission. Of the amount appropriated $356000 in fiscal year 2016 and $362000 in fiscal year 2017 are for the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission to carry out its duties under Minnesota Statutes section 85.536 including the continued development of a statewide system plan for regional parks and trails outside the seven-county metropolitan area.","The target is to acquire 472.23 acres of park land., The target is to develop or create 5.9 miles of new trail., The target is to complete 2 unit plans or plan amendments., The target is to restore or improve 15.5 miles of trail., The target is to develop or rehabilitate 3 parks.","378.07 acres of regional park were acquired. , 3.1 miles of new trail were developed. , Unit plan or amendment completed: Grant recipients have up to 3 years to complete their work. If a project receives federal funding the time period of the grant is extended to equal the availability of the federal funding. Measurable outcomes will be reported once all grants originating from fiscal year 2016 are closed., 15.5 miles of trail was restored or improved. , Three regional parks were developed or rehabilitated. ",,,,,215450,,1.55,,,"To provide grants to local units of government to support parks and trails of regional or statewide significance outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Funding for this grant program is from the Parks and Trails Fund created by the Minnesota Legislature from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment passed by the voters in 2008. Beginning July 1, 2015 (fiscal year 2016), the Greater Minnesota Regional Parks and Trails Commission (GMRPTC) assumed management of reviewing and awarding these grants. That is, they became 'pass-through' grants with DNR staff providing administrative support to GMRPTC only. ",,,2015-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Audrey,Mularie,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5549",audrey.mularie@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/parks-and-trails-legacy-grant-program-gmrptc-managed,,,,
34098,"Penumbra Theatre exhibit",2016,34601,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Outcome goals: MHC attendance greater than 240,000 in FY17. Net Promoter Score goal +50 or higher. Increased visitation by African Americans. Increased interest in, knowledge of and appreciation for Minnesota history. Increased appreciation of MHS and its programs.",,,,,34601,5000,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.50,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","In 2017, St. Paul's world renown Penumbra Theatre will celebrate its 40 anniversary. This exhibit, a three way partnership between MNHS, Penumbra Theatre and the University of Minnesota, will highlight the central role this local theater company played in the burgeoning Black Arts Movement through documents, artifacts, costumes, videoed performances and interviews, and stage sets. Exhibit opens February 18 and runs through July 31, 2017. Outcome goals: MHC attendance greater than 240,000 in FY17. Net Promoter Score goal +50 or higher. Increased interest in, knowledge of and appreciation for Minnesota history. Increased appreciation of MHS and its programs.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/penumbra-theatre-exhibit,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2025,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2024,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments ","The results for FY24 are currently under review and analysis. The final report will be available in June 2025. ",,,,318465,46459,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2023,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2025. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 820 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,580 Total number of pesticide analytes - 186 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 49 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 70 Total pesticide analyses completed - 122,239 Total number of pesticide detections - 5,897 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (84) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (94) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1), and Chlorpyrifos (10) ",,,,296745,45473,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2022,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2025. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 851 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,623 Total number of pesticide analytes - 185 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 49 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 77 Total pesticide analyses completed - 122,293 Total number of pesticide detections - 6,828 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor (84) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (93) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chlorpyrifos (13) ",,,,298907,44221,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2021,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events  - 714 Number of pesticide samples collected  -  1,379 Total number of pesticide analytes  -  181 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater  -  42 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water  -  73 Total pesticide analyses completed  -  100,465 Total number of pesticide detections  -  4,365 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater  - Metolachlor ESA Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water  -  Hydoxyatrazine Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments  - Acetochlor (1), Chlorpyrifos (13)   ",,,,301456,48553,,2.29,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2020,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 838 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,586 Total number of pesticide analytes - 178 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 45 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 73 Total pesticide analyses completed - 121,384 Total number of pesticide detections - 7,274 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (87) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (95) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chlorpyrifos (13) ",,,,306828,46024,,2.41,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2019,350000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M. L. 2017: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 972 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,909 Total number of pesticide analytes - 166 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 47 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 69 Total pesticide analyses completed - 119,963 Total number of pesticide detections - 7,605 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (82) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (97) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chrlopyrifos (13) ",,,,315168,39428,,2.54,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2018,350000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 957 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,819 Total number of pesticide analytes - 155 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 40 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 66 Total pesticide analyses completed - 103,375 Total number of pesticide detections - 6,188 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (81) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (93) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chlorpyrifos (9) ",,,,336196,47437,,2.25,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2017,350000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Number of target analytes considered per year Number of target analytes detected per year Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and effectiveness of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Fund Performance Report in February 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of the report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures. MDA's water quality monitoring program is reporting on performance measure EDWOM2: Changes over time in key water quality parameters for lakes, streams and wetlands and EDWOM3: Changes over time in pesticides, nitrate and other key water quality parameters in groundwater. ",,,,,290772,43936,,2.25,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2016,350000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and effectiveness of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Fund Performance Report in February 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of the report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures. MDA's water quality monitoring program is reporting on performance measure EDWOM2: Changes over time in key water quality parameters for lakes, streams and wetlands and EDWOM3: Changes over time in pesticides, nitrate and other key water quality parameters in groundwater. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year (143) • Number of target analytes detected per year (108) Groundwater detections: 39 Surfacewater detections: 69  ",,,"The MDA's Pesticide Monitoring Program is supported by the MDA's Pesticide Regulatory Account, Fertilizer Regulatory Account, General Funds and a federal grant. ",330496,52185,,2.25,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2015,350000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ",,"Number of target analytes considered per year (138) • Number of target analytes detected per year (98) Groundwater detections: 36 Surfacewater detections: 62  ",,,"The MDA's Pesticide Monitoring Program is supported by the MDA's Pesticide Regulatory Account, Fertilizer Regulatory Account, General Funds and a federal grant. ",306047,45417,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2014,350000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ",,"• Number of target analytes considered per year (135) • Number of target analytes detected per year (96) Groundwater detections: 37 Surfacewater detections: 59  ",,,,277096,40927,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2013,350000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and effectiveness of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Fund Performance Report in February 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of the report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures. MDA's water quality monitoring program is reporting on performance measure EDWOM2: Changes over time in key water quality parameters for lakes, streams and wetlands and EDWOM3:Changes over time in pesticides, nitrate and other key water quality parameters in groundwater. ","• Number of target analytes considered (129) • Number of target analytes detected (57) ",,,,311480,6075,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2012,350000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Number of target analytes considered per year Number of target analytes detected per year   ","• Number of target analytes considered (126) • Number of target analytes detected (61) ",,,,342294,6075,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2011,350000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (b) $325,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year ","• Number of target analytes considered (114) • Number of target analytes detected (57) ",,,,,6075,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2010,325000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (b) $325,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year ","• Number of target analytes considered (110) • Number of target analytes detected (56) ",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
33271,"Phalen Regional Park Changsha Style Chinese Garden",2016,49000,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$300,000 the first year is for a competitive grants program to provide grants to preserve and promote the cultural heritage of Minnesota.Of this amount, $50,000 in the first year is for a grant to the city of St. Paul to plan and design a garden to commemorate unrepresented cultural gardens in Phalen Park in the city of St. Paul and $150,000 in the first year is for a grant to Ramsey County to develop and install activity facilities in Ramsey County parks for culturally relevant games that are reflective of the current demographics in Ramsey County.The Minnesota Humanities Center shall operate a competitive grants program to provide grants for programs, including but not limited to: music, film, television, radio, recreation, or the design and use of public spaces that preserves and honors the cultural heritage of Minnesota. Grants made under this paragraph must not be used for travel costs inside or outside of the state.","- Strengthen multicultural relationships by providing a public park space for an unrepresented culture- Understand overall design concept of the Chinese Garden.- Understand associated costs to build and maintain the Chinese Garden facility.- Understand opportunities for programming and special events of the Chinese Garden facility","The project is complete. A concept plan has been developed for the garden which includes four distinct areas including: Lakeside plaza and pavilion, Aiwan Pavilion, Stone Garden, and Hmong Cultural Plaza.Presentation graphics illustrate the character of the garden from various angles as well as during multiple seasons of use. A video was prepared to supplement the 2d graphics and gives viewers a virtual tour of the garden. Together, these presentation materials will be used for future fundraising efforts. A cost estimate was prepared for the entire development of the garden and will provide benchmarks for fundraising goals. An illustrative plan, perspective renderings, a construction cost estimate, and 'fly thru' video was prepared for the project.",,,,49000,,N/A,1,"City of Saint Paul - Parks and Recreation","Local/Regional Government","This Minnesota Humanities Center Heritage Grant will allow project partners to plan and design a Chinese garden in Phalen Regional Park to commemorate the City of Saint Paul's Sister City Relationship with Changsha, China. ",,,2015-07-01,2016-07-31,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Bryan,Murphy,"City of Saint Paul - Parks and Recreation","400 City Hall Annex, 25 West Fourth Street","St Paul",MN,55102,651-266-6411,bryan.murphy@ci.stpaul.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/phalen-regional-park-changsha-style-chinese-garden,,,,
34085,"Play the Past: The Field Trip for the 21st Century Learner",2016,171977,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","The measurable outcomes for Play the Past include: 1. Net promoter score 2. Increased student use of 21st Century Skills 3. Increased student knowledge of MN history 4. Increased student interest in MN History 5. Increased teacher appreciate of MNHS as a valuable resource for teaching 6. Number of teachers and students served",,,199936,"National Endowment for Humanities",171977,19740,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",2.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","This groundbreaking project is creating a new model for school field trips, using mobile and web technologies to capitalize on the natural behaviors and learning styles of today's students. Serving approximately 7,000 students annually, Play the Past demonstrates how museums can use technology to create self-directed, personalized, responsive field trip experiences that deepen students' connection to history while honing their critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Upon entering the museum's Then Now Wow exhibit gallery, students receive handheld devices pre-installed with the mobile application. The application enhances students' experiences and promotes interaction with the physical exhibit by encouraging them to answer questions, solve problems, and collect digital artifacts related to the exhibit and items in MNHS's vast collections. This ""digital backpack"" of collected artifacts is then accessed back in the classroom by teachers and students, further expanding on the field trip experience and enhancing student learning. MNHS recently added a new tool for Play the Past teachers while at the museum. MNHS now provides teachers with iPads to access their students' digital backpacks while in the gallery, allowing teachers to see students' progress in real time and students to explore the resources of the digital backpacks before reaching home. Over 90 percent of teachers reported that this new tool helped them to understand what their students were doing during Play the Past. Over 95 percent of teachers reported that their students were either extremely or very engaged with Play the Past. MNHS is also working with Dakota artists and activists to add more American Indian content to Play the Past, layering on quests that explore Dakota art, language, and food in the tipi area of the Then Now Wow exhibit. Based on the overall success of the program, Play the Past was recently awarded a grant in March 2015 for $199,936 from the National Endowment for the Humanities to expand the program from the Then Now Wow exhibit to also include the Minnesota's Greatest Generation exhibit.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/play-past-field-trip-21st-century-learner,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2024,442975,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division expects to conduct burns on about 4,000 acres.  Previous 5 years average 4,168 acres/yr.  Vagaries of required weather conditions influence this metric more than others. ",,,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2023,279691,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","The division expects to conduct burns on about 5,000 acres, a return to levels more similar to pre-pandemic program activities. ","The division completed prescribed burns on 4,934 acres of Parks & Trails lands. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2022,274213,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ",,"The division completed prescribed burns on 4,041 acres of Parks & Trails lands. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2021,245544,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2020,241998,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2019,421323,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In 2019 the division is planning to conduct prescribed burns on approximately 6 000 acres.","The division conducted prescribed burns on 6 525 acres of State Park and Trail Division administered lands as of January 2019. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy ENRTF/LCCMR etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years.",,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2018,293300,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","In 2018 the division is planning to conduct prescribed burns on approximately 7 000 acres.","The division conducted prescribed burns on 6811 acres of State Park and Trail Division administered lands as of January 2018. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy ENRTF/LCCMR etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years.",,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2017,217563,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division will conduct prescribed burns on approximately 7 000 acres.","The division conducted prescribed burns on 7091 acres of State Park and Trail Division administered lands as of January 2017. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy ENRTF/LCCMR etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years.",,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2016,375000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division will conduct prescribed burns on approximately 6 800 acres.","The division conducted prescribed burns on approximately 6 492 acres of State Park and Trail Division administered lands as of January 2016. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy Bonding etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years.",,,,375000,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2015,199200,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division will conduct prescribed burns on approximately 5 000 acres.","The division has conducted prescribed burns on approximately 6 381 acres of State Park and Trail Division administered lands as of January 2015. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy Bonding etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years.",,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2014,225600,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division will conduct prescribed burns on approximately 5 000 acres.","The division has conducted prescribed burns on approximately 4 152 acres of State Park and Trail Division administered lands as of January 2014. This figure includes targets resulting from all sources of natural resource management funding (Legacy Bonding etc.). Legacy funding allows significant acceleration of accomplishments from pre-Legacy years.",,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2013,221298,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2012,221298,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","On average PAT has conducted prescribed burns on 11 600 acres per biennium. The division's target for the FY2012-2013 biennium is just over 12 000 acres.","The division has completed prescribed burns on 10 464 acres of state park lands. This is 87% of the target. Vagaries in weather impacted opportunities to burn additional acres. Final FY12-FY13 totals will be available at the end of the 2013 calendar year when field staff provide statewide accomplishment reports.",,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2011,150000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2 (2)",,,,,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
3218,"Prescribed Burning on State Park Lands",2010,150000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2 (2)",,"On average PAT has conducted prescribed burns on 10 000-13 000 acres per biennium. The division's target for the FY2010-2011 biennium is just over 19 000 acres.","The division has completed prescribed burns on 16 871 of state park lands. The division is well on its way to achieving the goal of 6 000 acres of additional prescribed burns conducted over the biennium (target +AD0- 19 164 acres). ",,,,,,,,,,"This program is to increase prescribed burning on Division of Parks and Trails (PAT) lands in order to meet shortfalls in achieving PAT restoration and management objectives. ","Prescribed burning is necessary to preserve fire-dependent native plant communities such as prairies and oak woodlands. Prescribed burning is also important at periodic intervals to maintain fire dependent native plant communities, stimulate seed production needed for new restoration sites and aid in controlling invasive species. The division's annual prescribed burn acreage will likely increase as the need to maintain additional restored fire dependent communities grows. ",,,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,Restoration/Enhancement,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/prescribed-burning-state-park-lands-0,,,,
33251,"Presentations for MN Association of Townships - Spring Short Courses",2016,5000,,,,,,,,,,,0.01,"University of Minnesota: Sponsored Projects Administration","Public College/University","This project will develop and present to the MN association of townships on stormwater best management practices and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permits. ",,,2016-01-01,2016-05-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,,,"University of Minnesota: Sponsored Projects Administration","450 McNamara Center 200 Oak Street Southeast",Minneapolis,MN,55455,"(612) 626-7441",,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/presentations-mn-association-townships-spring-short-courses,,,,
10004492,"Preserving and Protecting Minnesota Native Orchid Species",2016,167000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 08c","$167,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Minnesota Landscape Arboretum for propagation and cultivation research to enable long-term conservation of at least 15 selected species of the 48 native orchid species in Minnesota. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN - Landscape Arboretum","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_08c.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,David,Remucal,"U of MN - Landscape Arboretum","3675 Arboretum Dr",Chaska,MN,55318,"(952) 443-1418",remu0005@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/preserving-and-protecting-minnesota-native-orchid-species-0,,,,
10004448,"Preventing Phosphorous from Entering Water Resources through Drain Tiles",2016,505000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 04d","$505,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to develop a new nanocomposite material made from biomass that is designed to adsorb phosphorus, nitrogen, and pesticides from storm water and drain tile runoff discharge for recycling back to agricultural lands. This appropriation is subject to Minnesota Statutes, section 116P.10.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_04d.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Kenneth,Valentas,"U of MN","1479 Gortner Ave, 140 Gortner Labs","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(763) 595-0365",valentas@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/preventing-phosphorous-entering-water-resources-through-drain-tiles-0,,,,
10004473,"Preventing a New Disease of Pines in Minnesota",2016,371000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 06d","$371,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to establish early detection for heterobasidion, an invasive root rot fungus, and develop efforts to prevent its spread and reduce its impact. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_06d.pdf,2015-07-01,2019-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Robert,Blanchette,"U of MN","1991 Upper Buford Cir, 495 Borlaug Hall","St. Paul",MN,55126,"(612) 625-0202",robertb@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/preventing-new-disease-pines-minnesota-0,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2020,750000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$750,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance, outreach, and interventions to reduce risks to private-well owners. "," Assess whether radium is commonly found in private well water at unsafe levels. Assess whether there are additional contaminants that should be evaluated due to their potential presence and hazard in private well water. Determine what, if anything, should happen next based on findings from the arsenic sampling survey and arsenic concentration predictive mapping. Pilot approaches for promoting well testing and financial assistance for mitigation. Equip local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. Promote private well testing. ",,,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2019,400000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (e)","$400,000 the first year and $400,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance and outreach to reduce risks to private-well owners. "," Start assessing whether radium is commonly found in private well water at unsafe levels. Assess whether there are additional contaminants that should be evaluated due to their potential presence and hazard in private well water. Equip local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. Promote private well testing. Pilot approaches for promoting well testing. "," Developed the radium sampling plan and started sampling for gross alpha. Developed and distributed a communications toolkit for water testing laboratories to promote private well testing. Working in partnership with Choose Safe Places Minnesota to train childcare providers on private well testing. Collaborating with Becker County Soil and Water Conservation District to promote private well testing in Becker and Otter Tail counties. Created YouTube videos about private well testing, inspecting, and sealing and how to protect a private well before a flood. ",,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2018,400000,"MN Law 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 8(e)","$400,000 the first year and $400,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance and outreach to reduce risks to private-well owners. "," Finish statistical analysis for data. Present study results at state and national conferences. Publish two journal articles, one is accepted for publication in Groundwater journal in March 2018. "," Results of the statistical analysis are as follows: Filtering can make a significant difference in samples that were elevated then reduced in arsenic concentration a year later. Arsenic concentrations stabilize 3 to 6 months after well construction. Collecting samples at least 6 months after the well is drilled will give a more representative result of the long-term concentration. Collection of samples from plumbing rather than from the drill rig will give a more representative result.  Arsenic concentrations will not necessarily decrease with time, half the time it may increase a year later. Recommendation is for the homeowner to collect one more arsenic sample in the life of the well to verify the arsenic result, once the well has stabilized, at least 6 months afterward. Presented the study's results at the Geological Society of America in Seattle, WA in October 2017 The National Groundwater Association accepted the arsenic variability article and can be viewed online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.12643/full. Will present the study’s results at the Geological Society of America – North-Central Section, 52nd Annual Meeting in Ames, Iowa in April 2018 ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2017,325000,"MN Law 2015 Chapter 2 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","• Finish collecting the final 12-month water samples. • Perform statistical analysis on data. • Continue to track arsenic concentrations in new wells for a year after they are constructed to see if water chemistry stabilizes. • Determine how water sampling methods and the timing of sample collection contribute to arsenic test results in a new well. • Identify the conditions that control arsenic occurrence in groundwater. ","• Collected 109 water samples 12 months after the initial water samples were collected. • Started statistical analysis. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2016,,"MN Law 2015 Chapter 2 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","• Finish all water sample collection. • Perform statistical analysis on data. • Track arsenic concentrations in new wells for a year after construction to see if water chemistry stabilizes. • Study how water sampling methods and the timing of collecting water samples contribute to arsenic test results in a new well. • Study the conditions that control arsenic occurrence in groundwater. • Develop guidance for well contractors and private well owners to reduce risks from arsenic in well water. ","• Collected an additional 129 initial water samples for new wells, for a total of 254 wells. • Collected 252 water samples 3-6 months after the initial water samples were collected. • Collected 136 water samples 12 months after the initial water samples were collected. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2015,325000,"MN Law 2013 Chapter 137 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","• Track arsenic concentrations in new wells for a year after construction to see if water chemistry stabilizes. • Sample 125 newly constructed private water-supply wells by June 2015. • Determine how water sampling methods and the timing of collecting water samples contribute to arsenic test results in a new well. • Identify the conditions that control arsenic occurrence in groundwater. ","Sampled 162 newly constructed private water-supply wells. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2014,325000,"MN Law 2013 Chapter 137 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurence and magnitude of contaminiants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","Sample 200 - 205 newly constructed private water-supply wells by July 2015. ","Sampled 19 newly constructed private water-supply wells. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
34086,"Program Evaluation (Institutional Evaluation)",2016,185878,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Outcomes: Increased evaluation capacity Improved evaluation skills Increased program evaluation Improved program evaluation Outputs: # logic models # evaluation plans # evaluations # attendees at evaluation workshops # Team Based Inquiry events # TBI participants # Dashboards",,,,,185878,21013,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",2.20,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS continues to build a culture of evaluation. An evaluation manager leads institutional evaluation capacity building, as well as provides technical assistance and support to staff who evaluate ACHF projects and programs. An evaluation associate in the Education and Lifelong Learning Division facilitates evaluation efforts specifically in K-12 education and public programs. Three interns and numerous volunteers continue to support evaluation work. Twelve trainings were held to prepare volunteers to do visitor intercept interviews. Seventy-nine unique projects or teams engaged in some evaluation project overall. 2015 highlights include: ",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/program-evaluation-institutional-evaluation,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2014,1500000,,,,,,,,,,,15,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2015,1500000,,,,,,,,,,,15,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2016,940000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2017,1060000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2018,50000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2019,1950000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2020,300000,,,,,,,,,,,.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2021,1180000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2022,270000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(h)",,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2023,1200000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2024,1000000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
34069,"Public Awareness and Communication",2016,489663,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","1. Raise Minnesotans' awareness and participation in Legacy programs as measured by paid and unpaid media impressions and attendance. 2. Continue state funding of MNHS Legacy programs and projects, due in part, to excellent reporting and communication of how funds are used.",,,,,489663,54725,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",4.90,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS staff created communication strategies and promotional materials for Arts and Cultural Heritage Fund (ACHF) history projects, programs, and grants, including media kits for grant recipients. Increasing public awareness of ACHF investments will ensure that students, teachers, and the general public will use and benefit from them.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Preservation, Planning, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/public-awareness-and-communication-2,,,,
33968,"Publish the History of Special Education Administration",2016,9950,"Laws of Minnesota for 2011 Chapter 6, Article 4, Subdivision 5, Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants.","Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants. $5,250,000 the first year and $5,250,000 the second year are for history programs and projects operated or conducted by or through local, county, regional, or other historical or cultural organizations; or for activities to preserve significant historic and cultural resources.","Available upon request. Contact",,,,"Available upon request. Contact",9950,,"Deb Wall, President; Karen Kennedy, Vice-President; Cheryl Johnson, Treasurer; Nan Records, Secretary; Karon Joyer, 2 new members-at-large to be appointed this summer",0.00,"Minnesota Special Education Leaders Foundation (MNSELF)","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To hire qualified professionals to publish a book on the history of special education administration.",,,2015-09-01,2016-09-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Deb,Wall,"Minnesota Special Education Leaders Foundation (MNSELF)","1504 Windemere Drive North",Fridley,MN,55421-1358,651-357-4881,,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/publish-history-special-education-administration,,"Minnesota Historical Society Governing Board: William R. Stoeri, President Missy S. Thompson, Vice President Ruth Huss, Vice President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary Dean M. Nelson, Treasurer Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Robert Bruininks Judith S. Corson D. Stephen Elliott Phyllis Rawls Goff William D. Green David R. Hakensen Ruth S. Huss Martha Kaemmer Dennis L. Lamkin David M. Larson Charles Mahar Dean M. Nelson Elizabeth M. Nordlie Dennis Nguyen Peter R. Reis Hussein Samatar Simon Stevens Susan Kenny Stevens William R. Stoeri Karen Wilson Thissen Missy Staples Thompson Eleanor Winston Ex-Officio: Mark Dayton, Governor Yvonne Prattner Solon Lieutenant Governor Mark Ritchie, Secretary of State Lori Swanson, Attorney General Rebecca Otto, State Auditor",,
33825,"RAMAS Modeling of Wild Rice Populations",2016,3400,,,,,,,,,,,0.02,"Laura Phillips-Mao","For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is the development of a model of wild rice population dynamics, using RAMAS software, which mimics natural variability of population levels and calculates the probability of population extinction. ",,,2016-03-01,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Edward,Swain,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2772",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/ramas-modeling-wild-rice-populations,,,,
33981,"Rehousing Paper and Photograph Collections",2016,4846,"Laws of Minnesota for 2011 Chapter 6, Article 4, Subdivision 5, Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants.","Statewide Historic and Cultural Grants. $5,250,000 the first year and $5,250,000 the second year are for history programs and projects operated or conducted by or through local, county, regional, or other historical or cultural organizations; or for activities to preserve significant historic and cultural resources.","Available upon request. Contact",,,,"Available upon request. Contact",4846,,"President Peter Poss, Vice president Don Simes, Secretary Lisa Berg, Treasurer Carl Jessen, Mike McMenomy, Don Hartnett, Jon Wright, Tom Fletcher, Theresa Hershey, Tom Boyd.",0.00,"Minnesota Veterinary Historical Museum","Non-Profit Business/Entity","To provide better organization of the archival materials, allowing for greater public access to the community",,,2015-09-01,2016-09-01,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Maravelas,"Minnesota Veterinary Historical Museum","1365 Gortner Ave","Saint Paul",MN,55108,612-581-8207,,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rehousing-paper-and-photograph-collections,,"Minnesota Historical Society Governing Board: William R. Stoeri, President Missy S. Thompson, Vice President Ruth Huss, Vice President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary Dean M. Nelson, Treasurer Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Robert Bruininks Judith S. Corson D. Stephen Elliott Phyllis Rawls Goff William D. Green David R. Hakensen Ruth S. Huss Martha Kaemmer Dennis L. Lamkin David M. Larson Charles Mahar Dean M. Nelson Elizabeth M. Nordlie Dennis Nguyen Peter R. Reis Hussein Samatar Simon Stevens Susan Kenny Stevens William R. Stoeri Karen Wilson Thissen Missy Staples Thompson Eleanor Winston Ex-Officio: Mark Dayton, Governor Yvonne Prattner Solon Lieutenant Governor Mark Ritchie, Secretary of State Lori Swanson, Attorney General Rebecca Otto, State Auditor",,
10004440,"Reintroduction and Interpretation of Bison in Minnesota State Parks",2016,600000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03h","$600,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources to preserve American bison by reintroducing bison to Minneopa State Park and provide interpretive learning opportunities at Blue Mounds and Minneopa State Parks. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"MN DNR","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03h.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"MN DNR","500 Lafayette Rd, Box 39","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5594",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/reintroduction-and-interpretation-bison-minnesota-state-parks-0,,,,
10004489,"Renewable and Sustainable Fertilizers Produced Locally",2016,1000000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 07a","$1,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for the Morris West Central Research and Outreach Center and Twin Cities Campus to develop and demonstrate new technologies aimed at enabling renewable and sustainable production of ammonia for fertilizer in a localized manner. This appropriation is subject to Minnesota Statutes, section 116P.10. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_07a.pdf,2015-07-01,2019-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Alon,McCormick,"U of MN","151 Amundson Hall",Minneapolis,MN,55455,"(612) 625-1822",mccormic@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewable-and-sustainable-fertilizers-produced-locally-0,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2024,8632257,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2023,5898561,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2022,6110684,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2021,6947973,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan",,,,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2020,6461909,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors. Specifically in the first half of the FY20/21 biennium we plan to: • Complete vault toilet projects at Fort Ridgely SP Judge Magney SP Hayes Lake SP Monson Lake SP and Charles Lindberg SP; • Begin construction on shower buildings at Fort Ridgely SP St. Croix SP and Myre-Big Island SP; • Complete construction of Miners Mountain Road at Cuyuna Country State Recreation Area; • Complete construction of the Cedar Hill Campground at Whitewater SP; • Begin design of the shower building at Chase Point in Scenic SP; • Begin design of the Sibley SP Lakeview Campground. • Continue design work of Glendalough SP bike trail extension. • Begin design work of Beltrami State Forest – Clear River OHV campground. • Continue design work on the following projects: Old Mill SP portfolio update the interpretive displays at St. Croix SP Itasca SP Nicollet Court Tettegouche Camp rehabilitation and the Sibley SP amphitheater. ",,,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2019,4451564,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors. Specifically in the second half of the FY18/19 biennium we plan to • complete several projects underway in FY18 (see the FY18 accomplishments section) and • do predesign work for replacement of sanitation buildings at Frontenac SP and St Croix SP (Painted Rock Springs campground); • upgrade interpretive displays at St. Croix SP; • predesign a sanitation building replacement at Myre-Big Island SP; • design replacements for two vault toilets and related infrastructure at Ft Ridgely SP (construction in FY20); • design replacements for two vault toilets at Judge Magney SP and three at Hayes Lake SP (construction in FY20); • design campground shower building at Ft. Ridgely SP (construction in FY20).","Specifically in FY19 (the second year of the biennium) we: • Did design work on shower buildings at Frontenac SP Fort Ridgely SP Maplewood SP and Myre-Big Island SP; • Completed design work on vault toilets at Fort Ridgely SP; • Began design work on vault toilets at Hayes Lake SP and Monson Lake SP; • Began the design work on the Old Mill SP portfolio update; • Completed the shower buildings at Buffalo River SP; • Began design work on the upgraded interpretive displays at St. Croix SP; • Began construction of the Temperance River SP Upper Campground shower building; • Completed construction of a shed and bison pond at Minneopa SP; • Began design work at Itasca SP Nicollet Court; • Began design work on Tettegouche Camp rehabilitation project; • Began construction of the Cedar Hill Campground at Whitewater SP; • Began design work of the amphitheater at Sibley State Park; • Completed rehabilitation of the St. Croix SP bike trail and Hay Creek bridge; ",,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2018,3582358,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors. Specifically in the FY18/19 biennium we plan to -upgrade visitor center display at Whitewater State Park; -rehabilitate the beach area at Sibley SP; -do pre-design work on the Nicollet Court Rehab (equires additional Asset Preservation funding to complete) Fort Ridgely sanitation building and Temperance River Lower Campground makeover; -replace shower building at Buffalo River and Temperance River SPs; -launch a sustainable hiking trails pilot project in selected state parks; -rehab bike trails at St. Croix State Park; -complete the conversion of the Camden State Park manager's residence to lodging; -and more.","Specifically in FY18 (the first year of the biennium) we: • upgraded the visitor center display at Whitewater State Park (in progress); • rehabilitated the beach area at Sibley SP (in progress to be completed in Spring 2019); • did pre-design work on the Itasca SP Nicollet Court building rehabilitation (the rehab component of this project will require additional Asset Preservation funding to complete); • did design work on the Temperance River SP Lower Campground makeover (this project will take several years to complete); • moved forward with replacing shower buildings at Buffalo River SP (underway to be done in FY19) and Temperance River SP (design complete in FY18); • launched a sustainable hiking trails pilot project in selected state parks (Halloway Hill at Maplewood SP and phase one of rehabbing an historic wayside trail Cascade River SP); • began rehabbing bike trails at St. Croix State Park (the trail bridge over Hay Creek is being replaced in FY19 trail repaving will begin in FY19 with completion planned for FY20); • converted the Camden State Park manager's residence to lodging (significant progress in FY18 to be completed early in FY19). • replaced a vault toilet at Schoolcraft SP; and • began planning and design of improvements at Miners Mountain Road at Cuyuna State Recreation Area (will be finished in FY19/20). ",,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2017,4735579,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","In FY17 (the second year of the biennium) we completed: -rehab of the historic Savanna Portage trail in Savanna Portage State Park as well as design of trails at Hallaway Hill (Maplewood SP) Chase Point (Scenic SP) and to the pack-in campsites at Afton State Park; -replaced the sanitation building at Cascade River SP; -conducted staff training in sustainable trail development.",,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2016,4289555,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","In FY16 (the first year of the biennium) we completed rehab of a bridge providing key snowmobile connection in Itasca State Park and made progress on state park projects such as major interpretive display upgrades at Itasca and Gooseberry state parks and conversion of former residence at Camden State Park into a lodging facility. Many projects begun in FY16 will be completed in FY17 (second year of the biennium).",,,,4289555,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2015,2680018,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","Projects to be completed include repaving the Chapel parking lot at Fort Snelling State Park enhancing ADA accessibility within Gooseberry and Split Rock Lighthouse State Parks converting an historic stone shelter at Flandrau State Park into a lodging facility repairing the failing retaining wall and incorporating ADA parking and walkways at the beach at Sibley State Park designing campground rehabilitation at Whitewater (project to be completed under next year's Legacy funding) replacing the historic railing and incorporating ADA compliant walkways at Minneopa State Park Falls area and changing all lighting at William O'Brien State Park to low energy alternatives.",,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2014,2702528,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","Rehabilitation projects include but are not limited to reconstructing a 6 mile stretch of bike trail in Itasca State Park rehabbing several hiking trails in Gooseberry Tettegouche and Split Rock Lighthouse State Parks upgrading electric and water in campgrounds in McCarthy Beach Scenic State Parks and at Thistledew forect recreation area and converting the Bear Paw Store at Itasca State Park into a lodging facility. New picnic tables and accessible fire rings were also purchased for a number of parks. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2013,800000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors., Facility renewal projects to be designed and/or constructed in FY2013","Projects include upgrades to campgrounds and rehabilitating park roads vault toilets water lines and walking trails. Additional projects are in progress., ",,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2012,725000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors., Parks and Trails Division will construct 9 projects approved in 2010 for design. Thirty-three designed projects are approved for construction in upcoming years totaling over $4 million dollars., Facility renewal projects that were designed/constructed in FY 2012","Projects include upgrades to campgrounds and rehabilitating park roads vault toilets water lines and walking trails. , , Completed 18 facility renewal projects in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas.",,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2011,2119864,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2(3)",,"To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","Projects include upgrades to the River Inn at Jay Cooke State Park complete replacement of the campground at Lake Shetek State Park new pumps for the Flandrau State Park swimming pool and rehabilitating park roads. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3211,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Park and Recreation Areas",2010,1904932,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2(3)",,"To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors., All 67 state parks and 7 state recreation areas will receive benefit from renewal and rehabilitation projects.","Projects include replacement of an elevator at the Croft Mine at Cuyuna Country State Recreation Area repairing a septic line at Buffalo River State Park and campsite electrification projects at Father Hennepin and Glacial Lakes State Parks., All state parks and recreation areas received improvements as major purchases of new picnic tables and new safer fire rings were distributed in 2010. For 2011 project funding was allocated to 58 projects and the work is primarily in the design phase with construction expected for 9 projects in summer 2012.",,,,,,,,,,"This program funds rehabilitation and renewal of buildings and other recreational facilities in Minnesota State Parks and Recreation Areas. ","For years there were more renewal and maintenance projects identified in state parks and recreation areas than could be completed with available funding sources. The Legacy amendment has provided a much welcomed source of dedicated funds to use for facility renewal. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Stacy,Smith,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5649",stacy.smith@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-park-and-recreation-areas,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2024,3403420,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2023,2810993,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","FY23 Legacy funding will support the following trail and bridge renewal and rehabilitation: • Minnesota Valley State Trail/Design only for Shakopee segment rehabilitation • Minnesota Valley State Trail /Design only for Shakopee Slope Failure • Blazing Star State Trail/0.25 mile rehabilitation • Casey Jones State Trail/Woodstock Upgrading – Design Only • Gateway State Trail/Westminster St Bridge Replacement ",,,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2022,2417166,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ",,"FY22 Legacy funding supported the following trail and bridge renewal and rehabilitation: • Alex LaVeau State Trail/Wrenshall Culvert Replacement • Sakatah-Singing Hills State Trail/ADA Intersection Improvements – 9 miles • Sakatah-Singing Hills State Trail/Lime Valley Slope Failure repair – 0.25 miles • Blue Ox Trail/Turtle River Bridge rehabilitation • CJ Ramstad-Northshore State Trail/Design Only for Big 39 Creek bridge replacement • CJ Ramstad-Northshore State Trail/Design Only for Beaver River bridge replacement ",,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2021,772424,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","TRAILS: Sakatah Singing Hills State Trail requires improvements to provide ADA-compliant public road intersections between Waterville and Faribault final engineering in-progress with construction in anticipated in late FY21 or FY22., BRIDGES: Root River State trail has two historic bridges that require structural rehabilitation; an overhead steel truss bridge and a girder truss bridge. Project engineering and plans completed to replace bridge decks and railings. Funds being sought for construction.",", ",,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2020,972812,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors. Minnesota state trails meet current needs and provide high-quality recreation opportunities for a variety of visitors with different interests needs and abilities. Priorities are informed by the Parks and Trails System Plan. Specifically in FY20 we plan to use Legacy funds (in whole or part) to: • do engineering work on two to four bridges on one or more of the following: the Harmony-Preston Valley State Trail the Taconite State Trail the NorthShore/CJ Ramstad State Trail and the Great River Ridge State Trail; • replace two bridges on the Taconite and Northsore/CJ Ramtsad State Trails with culverts; • rehabilitate the abutments on one bridge of the Harmony-Preston Valley State Trail; • complete the structural rehabilitation of two bridges on the Great River Ridge ST; • Complete the final engineering for the stabilization of a large slope failure along the Sakatah Singing Hills State Trail;, To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors. Minnesota state trails meet current needs and provide high-quality recreation opportunities for a variety of visitors with different interests needs and abilities. Priorities are informed by the Parks and Trails System Plan. In FY20 there is no funding allocated specifically for state trail rehabilitation or renewal. ","BRIDGES: Completed rehabilitation/repair of existing trail bridge damaged by vandalism over Pine River and located on the Mathew Lourey State Trail. Completed preliminary engineering for the replacement of the Arrowhead State Trail bridge over Flint Creek that had to be closed pending replacement. Current bridge has insufficient load capacity for motorized use and to safely conduct routine maintenance. , TRAILS: In FY 21 completed river bank stabilization for a segment of Root River State Trail will complete engineering for culvert replacement on Brown’s Creek State Trail supplemental construction costs provided for the completed rehabilitation of 5.7 mile segment of Sakatah Singing Hills State Trail between Elysian and Waterville.",,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2019,2125540,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ",,,,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2018,2140164,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors. Minnesota state trails meet current needs and provide high-quality recreation opportunities for a variety of visitors with different interests needs and abilities. Priorities are informed by the Parks and Trails System Plan. Specifically in FY18 we plan to repave about 2 miles of the Willard Munger State Trail from Beck's Rd to Mile marker 138 (Legacy with federal flood repair $).","FY18 accomplishments: Specifically in FY18 Legacy funds: •repaved about two miles of the Willard Munger State Trail from Beck's Rd to Mile marker 138 (Legacy with federal flood repair $); •repaired a quarter mile of the Gitchi-Gami State Trail in Temperance SP (ground water problems/ADA improvements). ",,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2017,2057941,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Ch. 2, Art. 3, Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17,237,000 the first year and $18,067,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe  unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors. In FY17 large culvert on the Paul Bunyan State Trail will be replaced., To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe  unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors. Minnesota state trails meet current needs and provide high-quality recreation opportunities for a variety of visitors with different interests  needs and abilities.Specifically  in FY17 we plan to repave about four miles of the Root River State Trail from Peterson to Rushford  and about six miles of the Glacial Lakes State Trail from Willmar to Spicer. ","Repaving work: In FY 17 we repaved four (4) miles of the Root River State Trail from Peterson to Rushford (all Legacy) and about six (6) miles of the Glacial Lakes State Trail from Willmar to Spicer (80% Legacy leveraging 20% FRTP $); repaved about three (3) miles of the Willard Munger ST in Duluth between Grand Ave and Becks Rd (10% Legacy); repaved two (2) miles of the Douglas ST (100%) Legacy; repaved over six (6) miles of the Sakatah ST from Mankato to Madison Lake (100%) Legacy. Additionally about 1000 feet of the Gitchi Gami ST in Temperance River SP was rehabbed to meet ADA standards for grade. Bridge and culvert work: in FY17 we replaced four (4) culverts on the Willard Munger ST and one (1) culvert on the Paul Bunyan ST (Culvert inspection and inventory had been funded by Legacy in earlier years making this work possible). Additionally 14 bridges (one on the Root River and 13 on the Great River Ridge) were inspected and inventoried and four (4) bridges on the Root River ST were replaced with culverts greatly reducing future operations maintenance and rehab costs at those locations. ",,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2016,2162750,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","FY16 bridge and culvert work included completion of the Blue Ox Big Falls bridge rehab replacement of bridge #4 on the Root River Trail with a culvert erosion control on Root River bridge 47 and completion of assessment of culvert needs on the Willard Munger State Trail.",,,,2162750,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2015,2032534,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","Projects included repairs on the the Gitchi Gami Paul Bunyan Willard Munger and Taconite State Trails.",,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2014,1958472,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","In FY13 21.6 miles of state trail was repaved including segments along the Willard Munger and Sakatah-Singing Hills State Trails.",,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2013,935000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","Rehabilitation included repaving 3.6 miles of trail on the Sakatah Singing Hills State Trail. ",,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2012,1600000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","Sec. 3. Department of Natural Resources (a)$14262000 the first year and $14603000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1)Connect people to the outdoors; (2)Acquire land and create opportunities; (3)Maintain existing holdings; and (4)Improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","In FY11 the Parks and Trails Division rehabilitated 8.2 miles of state trail including segments along the Willard Munger and Paul Bunyan State Trails.",,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2011,2016900,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2(3)",,"To rehabilitate facilities to preserve our cultural resources and create safe unforgettable recreation experiences for visitors.","Through 1 October 2011 The Parks and Trails Division initiated the reconstruction of approximately 5 miles of trail on the Heartland ~5 miles on the Paul Bunyan and 1 mile on the Willard Munger State Trails.",,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
3224,"Renewal and Rehabilitation of State Trails and Bridges",2010,1944490,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 3 Sec. 2(3)",,,,,,,,,,,,,"Renewal of existing State Trail surfaces, parking areas, and trail wayside areas, improving accessibility, enhancing user safety and implementing current best management practices. MNDNR Parks and Trails Division has a identified approximately 85 miles of existing state trail in need of rehabilitation and upgrading. This program also focuses on the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state trail bridges, including structural engineering inspections of all trail bridges . Of the more than 300 existing bridges on State Trails, the majority are wood or masonry former railroad structures of which more than 1/3 exceed 100 years old. Previous PAT Legacy reporting separated bridges from trails, which is no longer the division's reporting strategy as they are part of the same system of recreational use. ","The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail renewal efforts are focused on the rehabilitation of existing state trails and state trail facilities, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing infrastructure. The Parks and Trails Division's State Trail Bridge efforts are focused on the comprehensive inspection of existing state trail bridges and the rehabilitation or replacement of existing state bridges, to enhance user safety, improve accessibility and repair or replace damaged or deteriorated existing structures. Priorities are informed by the DNR Parks and Trails System Plan. ",,2009-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Kent,Skaar,"MNDNR Division of Parks and Trails","500 Lafayette Rd","St Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5636",kent.skaar@state.mn.us,"Capital Development/Rehabilitation","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/renewal-and-rehabilitation-state-trails-and-bridges-0,,,,
34089,"Research Fellowships Programs",2016,40362,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Number of applicants, number of articles submitted to MNopedia, number of presentations to staff for purposes of staff development.",,,,,40362,1210,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.10,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS continued the Legacy Research Fellowships program in FY15 with a productive second year of adding to the body of knowledge and interpretation of Minnesota's pre- and post-statehood history. Four scholars were selected as research fellows. Three scholars received $5,000 awards and one received a $1,000 award. The Legacy Research Fellows used the Gale Family Library at the Minnesota History Center to research their topics, which included: ",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/research-fellowships-programs,,,,
33256,"Roadside Swale Infiltration Study",2016,4589,,,,,,,,,,,0.02,"SRF Consulting","For-Profit Business/Entity","This work will determine the feasibility of alternatives to monitor roadside swales. ",,,2016-01-05,2016-04-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,David,Fairbairn,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2659",,"Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/roadside-swale-infiltration-study,,,,
34087,"Scan-on-Demand Digitization of Archival Collections",2016,50730,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Number of collections requested by users, number of collection units scanned, number of web hits on online materials.",,,,,50730,4000,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.40,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS has in its care over 100,000 cubic feet of hard-copy government records and manuscript collections dating from the territorial period to the present. To access the vast majority of these holdings, researchers must currently visit the History Center or make other special arrangements. In FY16, MNHS is piloting a unique ""scan on demand"" service for researchers that will allow them to request, either online or in person, the digitization of specific materials with the resulting images being put online for wide public access.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Digitization/Online Information Access, Planning","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/scan-demand-digitization-archival-collections,,,,
34078,"Shakopee and Medicine Bottle Event",2016,5000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","This project provided a community meal following ceremonies held at Fort Snelling. The intangible outcomes build on existing relationship with the Dakota community. This was a one-time program with long-term benefit for both MNHS and the Dakota community.",,,,,5000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","American Indian ceremonies were held at Historic Fort Snelling in November 2015, marking the 150th anniversary of the execution of Sakpedan (Shakopee) and Wakanozhanzhan (Medicine Bottle) at Fort Snelling. They were convicted by a military commission for their participation in the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862. MNHS provided a community meal for the Dakota community immediately following the ceremonies.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Demonstration/Pilot Project","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/shakopee-and-medicine-bottle-event,,,,
10004510,"SNA Acquisition, Restoration, Enhancement and Public Engagement",2016,4000000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 09c","$4,000,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources to acquire at least 350 acres of lands with high-quality native plant communities and rare features to be established as scientific and natural areas as provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 86A.05, subdivision 5, restore and improve at least 550 acres of scientific and natural areas, and provide technical assistance and outreach. A list of proposed acquisitions must be provided as part of the required work plan. Land acquired with this appropriation must be sufficiently improved to meet at least minimum management standards, as determined by the commissioner of natural resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"MN DNR","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_09c.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Ann,Pierce,"MN DNR","500 Lafayette Rd N, Box 25","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5119",ann.pierce@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sna-acquisition-restoration-enhancement-and-public-engagement-0,,,,
34120,"Somali Oral History Project",2016,52294,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","Number of interviews completed. Web statistics for the material once it goes online. Increased use of MNHS programs, materials, internships, etc. by Somali community.",,,,,52294,3425,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.30,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS continued its previous collaboration with Macalester College and the Somali community to add an additional 10 interviews to those that have already been completed. The new interviews focused on women's experiences.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/somali-oral-history-project-0,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2022,3942000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$3,942,000 the first year and $3,942,000 the second year are for protecting sources of drinking water, including planning, implementation, and surveillance activities and grants to local governments and public water systems. ",,"Protect the approximately 400,000 acres of vulnerable land surrounding drinking water wellhead areas statewide by 2034. Conduct ongoing source water protection planning and implementation for the state’s 500 vulnerable community public water systems. Complete first generation source water protection plans for the remaining 420 community public water systems by 2025. Complete revised source water assessments for all 23 surface water systems by 2025. Complete source water intake protection planning by 2027. Complete pilot source water protection planning for 10 non-community public water systems with at-risk populations by 2027. ",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2021,3942000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$3,942,000 the first year and $3,942,000 the second year are for protecting sources of drinking water, including planning, implementation, and surveillance activities and grants to local governments and public water systems ","Protect the approximately 400,000 acres of vulnerable land surrounding drinking water wellhead areas statewide by 2034. Conduct ongoing source water protection planning and implementation for the state’s 500 vulnerable community public water systems. Complete first generation source water protection plans for the remaining 420 community public water systems by 2025. Complete revised source water assessments for all 23 surface water systems by 2025. Complete source water intake protection planning by 2027. Complete pilot source water protection planning for 10 non-community public water systems with at-risk populations by 2027. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2020,2747000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 8","$2,747,000 the first year and $2,747,000 the second year are for protecting drinking water sources. ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2019,2907000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$2,587,000 the first year and $2,907,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources.  ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2018,2587000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$2,587,000 the first year and $2,907,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources.  ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,2346000,241000,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2017,1900000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources. ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,1645400,254600,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2016,1900000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 thesecond year are for protection of drinking water sources.","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020.",,,,,1622220,277780,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2015,1015000,"M.L. 2013, Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec 8 (b)","$1,615,000 the first year and $1,615,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources. Note:This appropriation is split between source water protection plan development and grants to encourage implementation.","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020.","As of the end of FY2014, approximately 253 of approximately 430 vulnerable public water supplies have completed wellhead protection plans. Most public water supplies have completed inner wellhead management zone potential contaminant source inventories, which are being updated.",,,,,145754,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2014,900000,"M.L. 2013, Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec 8 (b)","$1,615,000 the first year and $1,615,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources.",,"As of the end of FY2014, approximately 253 of approximately 430 vulnerable public water supplies have completed wellhead protection plans. Most public water supplies have completed inner wellhead management zone potential contaminant source inventories, which are being updated.",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2013,861297,"M.L. 2011, Chp. 6, Art. 2, Sec.8(b)","$1,415,000 the first year and $1,415,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water resources.",,,,,,678702,182595,,10,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2012,890000,"M.L. 2011, Chp. 6, Art. 2, Sec.8(b)","$1,415,000 the first year and $1,415,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water resources.",,,,,,676237,216134,,9,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2011,895436,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (a)","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,215,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources, including assisting 30 or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 60 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with the development and implementation of community source water protection plans before new community wells are installed, and awarding ten or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 20 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with source water protection implementation grants.",,,,,,,,,6.75,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2010,122579,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (a)","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,215,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources, including assisting 30 or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 60 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with the development and implementation of community source water protection plans before new community wells are installed, and awarding ten or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 20 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with source water protection implementation grants.",,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2024,647425,"M.L. 2023 Regular Session Ch. 40 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$28,572,000 the first year and $25,524,000 the second year are for state parks, recreation areas, and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","The division anticipates initiating about 30 projects to specifically benefit rare species such as Timber rattlesnakes (MN-Threatened), Dakota Skipper (Federally Endangered) and MN listed plant species.  Funding will also likely be used to support bison management, species inventories and to complete and information techology projects to integrate Parks & Trails data with other DNR divisions to create a more complete and useable set for resource assessments and management work.  ",,,,,,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2023,978917,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","The division anticipates initiating about 40 projects to specifically benefit rare species.  Funding will also likely be used to support bison management, species inventories and information technology projects to integrate Parks & Trails data with other DNR divisions to create a more complete and usable set for resource assessments and management work. ","41 projects were undertaken to benefit rare species.  Examples of rare species that benefitted include:MN-Threatened Pugnose Shiner (cont. reintroduction, Fed. Endangered Dakota Skipper (habitat improvement),MN- Threatened Kittentails (habitat improvement), MN-Special Concern Whorled Loosestrife (monitoring), MN-Threatened Timber Rattlesnakes (monitoring, habitat improvement) & MN-Threatened Blanding's Turtle (survey and habitat improvement).  Funding also was use to support bison management and species inventories. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2022,877482,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)","$21712000 the first year and $22149000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan ","This program seeks to create and enhance high quality natural resource habitat that are focused in special project areas. Special natural resource projects include things like inventory & monitoring rare species management addressing visitor impacts to resources cultural resource management & support costs. It is anticipated that a similar annual number of projects as in prior year to benefit rare species (30 projects) will be conducted in FY22. ","In 2022, 38 projects were undertaken to benefit rare species such as pugnose shiners (MN-Threatened), eastern hemlock (MN-Endangered) and Lined Snake (MN-Special Concern).  Funding also was use to support bison management and species inventories. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2021,859405,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","This program seeks to create and enhance high quality natural resource habitat that are focused in special project areas. Special natural resource projects include things like inventory & monitoring rare species management addressing visitor impacts to resources cultural resource management & support costs.",,,,,,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2020,919593,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","(a) $19819000 the first year and $20777000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan","This program seeks to create and enhance high quality natural resource habitat that are focused in special project areas. Special natural resource projects include things like inventory & monitoring rare species management addressing visitor impacts to resources cultural resource management & support costs. Examples include work to restore native pollinator habitat in state park sites within MN Prairie Plan Core Areas and resampling of vegetative study sites from decades ago to help inform management.","Special projects included upgrading critical prescribed burn equipment assisting with funding for the bison handling facility and wetland enhancement projects at Minneopa critical natural and cultural resource surveys to aid in development and resource management decisions projects to reintroduce or manage rare species such as pugnose shiner an timber rattlesnakes and seedling protection from deer at several state park sites.",,,,,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2019,510022,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to create and enhance high quality natural resource habitat that are focused in special project areas. Special natural resource projects include things like inventory & monitoring rare species management addressing visitor impacts to resources cultural resource management & support costs. A prime example is the creation of suitable habitat for the reintroduction of bison at Minneopa State Park. ","Examples of 2019 special projects included additional monies to supplement LCCMR funding to complete the bison handling facility and wetland at Minneopa State Park. Funding also helped to provide critical habitat management for rare species such as Henslow’s sparrow timber rattlesnakes and Blanding’s turtles. Legacy funding also provided the means to prepare critical state park and trail resource management plans.",,,,,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2018,459042,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16584000 the first year and $18891000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to create and enhance high quality natural resource habitat that are focused in special project areas. Special natural resource projects include things like inventory & monitoring rare species management addressing visitor impacts to resources cultural resource management & support costs. A prime example is the creation of suitable habitat for the reintroduction of bison at Minneopa State Park. ","In 2018 special projects included upgrading of essential burn equipment and training statewide assisting with funding for the bison handling facility and wetland enhancement projects at Minneopa critical natural and cultural resource surveys to aid in development and resource management decisions and seedling protection from deer at several sites such as: Itasca Lake Maria Lake Bemidji St. Croix and Zippel Bay. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2017,587699,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to create and enhance high quality natural resource habitat that are focused in special project areas. Special natural resource projects include things like inventory & monitoring rare species management addressing visitor impacts to resources cultural resource management & support costs. A prime example is the creation of suitable habitat for the reintroduction of bison at Minneopa State Park.","In 2017 special projects included upgrading of critical burn equipment and training statewide restoration of visitor impacts (Cascade McCarthy Beach) seedling protection from deer at several sites: St. Croix Itasca Lake Bemidji etc. Work to protect the Federally endangered dwarf trout lily in Southern region oak wilt management and cultural resource management efforts. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2016,230000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$17237000 the first year and $18067000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to create and enhance high quality natural resource habitat that are focused in special project areas. Special natural resource projects include things like inventory & monitoring rare species management addressing visitor impacts to resources cultural resource management & support costs. A prime example is the creation of suitable habitat for the reintroduction of bison at Minneopa State Park.","In 2016 special projects included inventory and monitoring projects as well as projects to protect historic resources rare species and restore visitor impacts. Examples include projects to map native plant communities and inventory rare species at several parks in the southern and central part of the state. Habitat was restored for timber rattlesnakes and a critical bat hibernaculum was re-gated. A decade of archaeological data was entered into the division’s cultural resource database so sites can be protected and impacts from visitor use along shorelines and trails were repaired and restored.",,,,230000,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2015,336090,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to create and enhance high quality natural resource habitat that are focused in special project areas. Special natural resource projects include things like inventory & monitoring rare species management addressing visitor impacts to resources cultural resource management & support costs. A prime example is the creation of suitable habitat for the reintroduction of bison at Minneopa State Park.","The primary project for calendar year 2015 has been preparing the pasture area for the bison herd to be installed in Minneopa State Park in fall 2015. This work has entailed some natural resource restoration and enhancement. Also in CY 15 a number of resource inventory efforts were completed. Projects included resource inventory projects for rare species and land cover mapping at several state parks. ",,,,,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
18219,"Special Natural Resource Projects in State Parks",2014,382800,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 3 Sec. 3(a)(3)","$16821000 the first year and $16953000 the second year are for state parks recreation areas and trails to: (1) connect people to the outdoors; (2) acquire land and create opportunities; (3) maintain existing holdings; and (4) improve cooperation by coordinating with partners to implement the 25-year long-range parks and trails legacy plan. ","This program seeks to create and enhance high quality natural resource habitat that are focused in special project areas. Special natural resource projects include things like inventory & monitoring rare species management addressing visitor impacts to resources cultural resource management & support costs. A prime example is the creation of suitable habitat for the reintroduction of bison at Minneopa State Park.","Work on the bison pasture that started in FY14 will continue into FY15.",,,,,,,,,,"This program aims to meet emerging and unique project needs in the Minnesota State Parks and Trails system. The program has initiated activities around Buffalo herd management and has plans for other activities to be determined. ",,,2011-07-01,,"Parks & Trails Fund","In Progress",,,Edward,Quinn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul, MN",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5597",edward.quinn@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/special-natural-resource-projects-state-parks,,,,
10004471,"State Parks and State Trails Land Acquisitions",2016,1500000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 09a","$1,500,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources to acquire at least 335 acres for authorized state trails and critical parcels within the statutory boundaries of state parks. State park land acquired with this appropriation must be sufficiently improved to meet at least minimum management standards, as determined by the commissioner of natural resources. A list of proposed acquisitions must be provided as part of the required work plan. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"MN DNR","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_09a.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,Christie,"MN DNR","500 Lafayette Rd","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5579",jennifer.christie@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/state-parks-and-state-trails-land-acquisitions-0,,,,
34109,"State Fair Programming",2016,45078,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","In FY16, we distributed 40,000 walking tour brochures and we drew 2,400 to daily History-on-a-Schtick shows (filling all seats at the Schilling Amphitheater). For our Minnesota State Fair History Walking Tour, 87 percent rated their experiences as excellent/very good. Other outcomes reported as strongly agree/agree: 1) 94 percent felt it increased their knowledge of Minnesota's history and/or cultural traditions; 2) 85 percent felt it increased their interest in learning more about Minnesota's diverse history and cultural traditions; 4) 80 percent felt it was welcoming and inclusive of their identity(ies). During FY16, 60.7 percent were participating in the tour for the first time and 39.3 were repeat participants.",,,,,45078,838,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.10,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS and the Minnesota State Fair Foundation are increasing awareness and knowledge of Minnesota history by providing quality programming for visitors to the Great Minnesota Get-Together. In 2015, the partners added new visual and written content for the Minnesota State Fair History Walking Tour brochure. Audio and visual content was available with the smartphone tour component, and staff presented audio/visual content via social media throughout the fair. Some 40,000 brochures were distributed throughout the fairgrounds during the run of the fair. History-on-a-Shtick, an original, vaudevillian romp through Minnesota's past with sing-alongs, trivia, and prizes, debuted in 2015 with daily performances on the Schell's Stage at the Schilling Amphitheater. MNHS worked with Minnesota playwright Beth Gilleland and a group of actors to create the production, which filled the 200-seat venue each day. One visitor called it the ""highlight of the fair"" and asked for it to be presented throughout the day in future years.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/state-fair-programming,,,,
34126,"State Capitol Civil War Curriculum",2016,20000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (6) Historic Recognition Grants","$275,000 the first year and $275,000 the second year are for a competitive grants program to provide grants for projects carried out by nonprofit organizations or public entities that preserve, recognize, and promote the historic legacy of Minnesota, with a focus on commemoration of Minnesota's role in the American Civil War. The Minnesota Historical Society shall work collaboratively with the Governor's Civil War Commemorative Task Force to determine project priorities. Funds may be used for projects administered or delivered by the Minnesota Historical Society in cooperation with the task force.","Number of students and teachers who tour the capitol and report on benefits of these enhanced materials",,,,,20000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Historic Recognition Grant program will preserve, recognize, and promote the historic legacy of Minnesota, with a focus on commemoration of Minnesota's role in the American Civil War via media, materials, and public programs to underscore the Civil War-era origins of the state capitol to complement the visitor experience once the building reopens for public tours in 2017 is the second of three projects being administered by MNHS in cooperation with the state's Civil War Commemoration Task Force are in development",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/state-capitol-civil-war-curriculum,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2012,200000,,,,,,81824,Federal,,,,1.01,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2013,200000,,,,,,,,,,,1.01,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2014,100000,,,,,,,,,,,.5,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2015,100000,,,,,,,,,,,.81,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2016,108547,,,,,,,,,,,.67,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2017,200000,,,,,,,,,,,1.56,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2018,99999,,,,,,,,,,,.26,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2019,99999,,,,,,,,,,,.8,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
33499,"Statewide Legacy Grant Projects SFY 2016",2016,,"Laws of Minnesota for 2015 Chapter 2--S.F. No. 1, Article 4, Section 2, Subdivision 5",,,"Total number of activities, programs, and/or events: Total participation/attendance: Total number of partnerships: ",,,,,,,,,Libraries,"Each fiscal year of ACHF funding, a majority of the participating regional library systems agree to allocate 10% of their ACHF funding to support statewide partnership projects. SELCO serves as the fiscal agent for statewide projects.",,,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Ann,Hutton,"Southeastern Libraries Cooperating (SELCO)","2600 19th St. NW ",Rochester,MN,55901-0767,"(507) 288-5513",ahutton@selco.info,,"Minnesota Department of Education",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-legacy-grant-projects-sfy-2016,,,,
34131,"Statewide Survey of Historical and Archaeological Sites",2016,300000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (4) Statewide Survey","$300,000 the first year and $300,000 the second year are for a contract or contracts to be awarded on a competitive basis to conduct statewide surveys of Minnesota's sites of historical, archaeological, and cultural significance. Results of the surveys must be published in a searchable form and available to the public on a cost-free basis. The Minnesota Historical Society, the Office of the State Archaeologist, and the Indian Affairs Council shall each appoint a representative to an oversight board to select contractors and direct the conduct of the surveys. The oversight board shall consult with the Departments of Transportation and Natural Resources.","Measurable outcomes will include: number of acres surveyed, number of sites identified & documented, number of public presentations or other communications completed.",,,,,300000,800,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.10,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Statewide Survey of Historical and Archaeological Sites focuses on tangible aspects of Minnesota's cultural heritage including historic places, archaeological sites, places with spiritual and traditional importance, and cultural landscapes. The survey focuses on the identification and evaluation of these places in order to improve their management and enhance their interpretation. Projects funded by the Survey include development of historic contexts to better understand the significance of specific types of historic sites; on-the-ground survey to identify previously undocumented archaeological sites and historic structures; in-depth studies to enhance regional understanding of the distribution of significant sites, and evaluation of current and future threats to sensitive sites in order to devise effective management strategies. Information generated by Survey projects is made available to the public on the website of the Minnesota Office of the State Archaeologist.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Pat,Emerson,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,612-725-2410,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-survey-historical-and-archaeological-sites-2,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2025,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (b) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices, cover crops, and other vegetative cover; assessing adoption of best management practices and other recommended practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2024,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (b) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices, cover crops, and other vegetative cover; assessing adoption of best management practices and other recommended practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ",,,,,1954307,268461,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2023,2585000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing adoption of best management practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ",,,,,2138119,275555,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2022,2585000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing adoption of best management practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ","The Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan was revised and updated in 2015 and the Groundwater Protection Rule went into effect in June 2019. The NFMP and GPR are being implemented to address nitrate from fertilizer in groundwater. Partnerships are established in vulnerable areas in support of groundwater protection: 36 local government units on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities 21 projects (SE Volunteer Network, Central Sands Volunteer Network, 18 Level 2 DWSMAs, RCPP) On average 39% of funds are passed through to local government units and research partners 13 on-farm nitrogen fertilizer BMP evaluation/demonstration sites On average about 98 NMI on-farm plots each year (92 standard plots, 6 advanced N-rate trials) engaging on average 98 famers and 27 crop advisers Regional and Township Testing: Approximately 32,880 private well owners have participated in either a one-time (snapshot) or long-term nitrate testing.                 ~ 650-900 of those private wells are tested annually through the Central Sands Private Well Network and Southeast Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network. 32,217 private wells in vulnerable townships have been tested through MDA’s Township Testing Program (2013-2019) Work completed in 344 vulnerable townships within 50 counties Overall, 9.1% (2,925) of the 32,217 wells tested in vulnerable areas exceeded the drinking water standard for nitrate 143 townships with ≥ 10% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (41%) 68 townships with 5-9 % of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (20%) 133 townships with <5% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (39%)   Groundwater Protection Rule: The MDA has completed a review of the monitoring data received from the Minnesota Department of Health in 2021 and 2022 and determined the following: 8 DWSMAs are designated as Level 1 with nitrate levels at or above 5.4 mg/L but less than 8 mg/L  21 DWSMAs are designated as Level 2 with nitrate levels at or above 8 mg/L  10 DWSMAs need more information before a level determination can be made In 2020, 61 on-farm demonstrations were located within 1 mile of the boundary of or within the Fall Nitrogen Fertilizer Restriction area or Level 2 DWSMAs.  (This includes all NMI trials, RRFSP, Discovery Farms MN, Red River Valley Drainage Water Management, Rosholt, and SE MN BMP programs.)   Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs are revised based on research: U of M nitrogen fertilizer rate studies at two regional locations led to the development of new nitrogen rate guidelines for irrigated corn (""Fertilizing Corn Grown on Irrigated Sandy Soils”) 12 applied research projects evaluate(d) BMPs (6 on-going) Rosholt Farm: 2 ongoing, 1 completed Clean Water Research:  2 ongoing, 5 completed Other research (funded by N in Groundwater): 2 ongoing   Education and outreach programs help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs to farmers and crop advisers: Nutrient management Funding two UM-Extension Educators – Agricultural Water Quality Protection positions Four state-wide conferences reaching over 1,200 attendees (virtual in 2021, both in-person and virtual in 2022) and impacting over 11,675,000 acres (Nitrogen & Nutrient Management) Continuing education credits offered to Certified Crop Advisers Minnesota Irrigators Program: Intensive three-day training program for irrigators and SWCD technical staff on applying nutrient and water BMPs for irrigated crop production.   Weather data and Irrigation management 14 weather stations - Central Minnesota Ag Weather Network (weather info available online in real-time). Stations are now included in the North Dakota Ag Weather Network with greater outreach to irrigators. 17 websites and 2 mobile apps utilize the data from the weather stations 10 counties use weather data as part of an online irrigation scheduling tool in Central Minnesota 17 weather information requests were received from 10 different researchers and technical staff from state agencies and U of M ",,,,2177280,273502,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2021,2585000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. ",,"The Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan was revised and updated in 2015 and the Groundwater Protection Rule went into effect in June 2019. The NFMP and GPR are being implemented to address nitrate from fertilizer in groundwater. Partnerships are established in vulnerable areas in support of groundwater protection 36 local government units on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities 21 projects (SE Volunteer Network, Central Sands Volunteer Network, 18 Level 2 DWSMAs, Precision Irrigation Cost-Share) On average 39% of funds are passed through to local government units and research partners 15 on-farm nitrogen fertilizer BMP evaluation sites Regional and Township Testing: Approximately 32,880 private well owners have participated in either a one-time (snapshot) or long-term nitrate testing.                ~ 650-900 of those private wells are tested annually through the Central Sands Private Well Network and Southeast Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network. 32,217 wells private wells in vulnerable townships have been tested through MDA’s Township Testing Program (2013-2019) Work completed in 344 vulnerable townships within 50 counties Overall, 9.1% (2,925) of the 32,217 wells tested in vulnerable areas exceeded the drinking water standard for nitrate 143 townships with ≥ 10% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (41%) 68 townships with 5-9 % of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (20%) 133 townships with <5% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (39%) Groundwater Protection Rule: The MDA has completed a review of the monitoring data received from the Minnesota Department of Health in 2021 and 2022 and determined the following: 8 DWSMAs are designated as Level 1 with nitrate levels at or above 5.4 mg/L but less than 8 mg/L  21 DWSMAs are designated as Level 2 with nitrate levels at or above 8 mg/L  10 DWSMAs need more information before a level determination can be made   Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs are revised based on research: U of M nitrogen fertilizer rate studies at two regional locations led to the development of new nitrogen rate guidelines for irrigated corn (""Fertilizing Corn Grown on Irrigated Sandy Soils”) Twelve applied research and on-farm projects evaluation Best Management Practices (BMPs) (6 on-going) Rosholt Farm Evaluating Crop Yield and Water Quality Impacts of Nitrogen Management, Cover Crops and Living Mulches in Irrigated Corn and Soybean (PI Fernandez) (on-going) Optimizing Nitrogen and Water Management under Irrigation and Quantifying Water Quality and Crop Yield Impacts (PI Sharma) (on-going) Evaluation and performance of different irrigation scheduling methods and their impact on corn production and nitrate leaching in central sands region of Minnesota (PI Sharma) (completed)   Clean Water Research Cover crop effectiveness in a series of farm BMPs, 2012-2019 (PI Lenhart) (completed) The Cover Crops, Water, and Nitrogen Nexus: How do they impact corn and soybean production and the environment? (PI Garcia y Garcia) (completed) The Minnesota Cover Crop Guide (PI Cates) (completed) Adjusting corn nitrogen rates using a preplant nitrate test to reduce potential for N loss in South-Central and Southeastern Minnesota (PI Kaiser) (waiting for final report) Improved Design, Performance, and Implementation of Saturated Buffers (PI Sands) (completed, in review) Development of the nitrogen BMP effectiveness tool for groundwater protection in Minnesota under varying soil types and climatic conditions (PI Mulla & Lazarus) (on-going) Recommendations for residual soil nitrogen testing and N rate adjustment (PI Fernandez) (on-going) USGS Age Dating USGS Predictive N Model On-Farm Demonstrations (15) Nutrient Management Initiative – Advanced Plots (MDA/Kaiser) Southeast Minnesota Nitrogen BMP Program (MDA/Jeff Vetsch)               Education and outreach programs help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs to farmers and crop advisers: Nutrient management Funding two UM-Extension Educators – Agricultural Water Quality Protection positions Four state-wide conferences reaching over 1,200 attendees (virtual in 2021, both in-person and virtual in 2022) and impacting over 11,675,000 acres (Nitrogen & Nutrient Management) Continuing education credits offered to Certified Crop Advisers Minnesota Irrigators Program: Intensive three-day training program for irrigators and SWCD technical staff on applying nutrient and water BMPs for irrigated crop production. Weather data and Irrigation management 14 weather stations - Central Minnesota Ag Weather Network (weather info available online in real-time). Stations are now included in the North Dakota Ag Weather Network with greater outreach to irrigators. 17 websites and 2 mobile apps utilize the data from the weather stations 10 counties use weather data as part of an online irrigation scheduling tool in Central Minnesota 17 weather information requests were received from 10 different researchers and technical staff from state agencies and U of M ",,,,1994814,274918,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2020,2585000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ","Partnerships 26 local government units partner with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities 50% of Clean Water Funds are passed through to local government units and research partners Groundwater Protection Rule Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMAs) that participate in mitigation activities  6 DWSMAs are designated as Level 1 with nitrate levels at or above 5.4 mg/L but less than 8 mg/L 17 DWSMAs are designated as Level 2 with nitrate levels at or above 8 mg/L Best Management Practices (BMPs) Four state-wide conferences promoted Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs to over 575 farmers and crop advisers, impacting 6,200,000 acres 9 applied research and on-farm projects are evaluating BMPs ",,,,1831883,211874,,11,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2019,2086000,"2017 Legislative Session - CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON H. F. No. 707 -Legacy Funding - ","M.L. 2017: (b) $2,085,000 the first year and $2,086,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1980124,193507,,10.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2018,2085000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2017, Regular Session, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (b) $2,085,000 the first year and $2,086,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,2484201,224865,,10.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2017,2585000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (b) $2,586,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; monitoring for pesticides when nitrate is detected; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,3349185,216545,,10.75,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2016,2586000,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (b) $2,586,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; monitoring for pesticides when nitrate is detected; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,2797007,230400,,"13.45 (includes 2.6 FTEs working on pesticide sampling in private wells)","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2015,2500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013:(b) $2,500,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrates in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation, including a substantial increase of monitoring of private wells in cooperation with the commissioner of health, monitoring for pesticides when nitrates are detected, and promoting and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices to protect groundwater from degradation. Of this amount, $75,000 may be used for accelerating the update for the commercial manure applicator manual. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1773017,153876,,8.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2014,2500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013:(b) $2,500,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrates in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation, including a substantial increase of monitoring of private wells in cooperation with the commissioner of health, monitoring for pesticides when nitrates are detected, and promoting and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices to protect groundwater from degradation. Of this amount, $75,000 may be used for accelerating the update for the commercial manure applicator manual.   ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,734113,66278,,8.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2013,850000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L.2011: (b) $850, 000 the first year and $850,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in high-risk areas and regionally and to promote and evaluate regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,586942,12000,,4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2012,850000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L.2011: (b) $850,000 the first year and $850,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in high-risk areas and regionally and to promote and evaluate regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to individual project pages. See ""related projects"". ","Please refer to individual project pages. See ""related projects"". ",,,,567100,12000,,4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2010,375000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (c) $375,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are to increase groundwater and drinking water protection from agricultural chemicals, primarily nutrients. M.L.2011: (b) $850, 000 the first year and $850,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in high-risk areas and regionally and to promote and evaluate regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,488043,10540,,"0.2 FTE (2010), 3.2 FTEs (2011)","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2025,1500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance; research, demonstration, and promotion projects on properly implementing best management practices and vegetative cover; and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2024,1500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance; research, demonstration, and promotion projects on properly implementing best management practices and vegetative cover; and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ",,,,,1355261,198301,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2023,1500000,"M.L. 2021, 1st Special Session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 3","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on properly implementing best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ",,,,,1341682,188182,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2022,1500000,"M.L. 2021, 1st Special Session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2021: (d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on properly implementing best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ","Technical assistance activities are a primary vehicle to work with the agricultural community to promote best management practices. As of October 2022, the MDA has cumulatively engaged >18,000 ag producers, crop advisors and Local Government Units at >450 education and outreach events. Implemented 677 Nutrient Management Initiative field trials in 2015-2021 Worked with an average of 98 farmers and 27 crop advisers each year on nutrient management trials The MDA maintains 20 active edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations around the state. Edge of Field data has been used for a variety of computer simulation and model calibrations including PTMApp, Adapt-N, SWAT, and the Runoff Risk Advisory Tool. Data are used to support the State’s Watershed Approach and referenced in numerous WRAPs reports. Data from Discovery Farms Minnesota, the Root River Field to Stream Partnership, the Clay County Drainage Site and Red River Valley Drainage Water Management have all been shared with local, state and national partners. Data has been used in peer-reviewed journal articles, large meta-analysis and to engage local farmers and discuss the effectiveness of conservation practices. The Root River Field to Stream Partnership (RRFSP) has helped identify critical areas and worked with farmers to implement conservation practices. This project has helped install and support: Over 105,000 feet of grassed waterways 15 new water and sediment control basins and catchment ponds Rehabilitation of an outdated flood control structure Planting of 370 acres of cover crops Feedlot improvements include an increase in manure storage to reduce manure applications on frozen soil, moving milk house wastewater systems, and abandonment of a feedlot in a high-risk location The highest runoff risk field in one of the study areas (80 acres) was enrolled into the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). An additional 50 acres was enrolled in other areas. Over 50% of the highest priority conservation practices were addressed by the end of 2017, about 70% addressed as of end of 2022. $1.8 million in state and federal conservation funds were distributed across three watersheds over a five-year period (60% on vegetative & structural practices, 40% on feedlot & manure waste improvements) In the glacial till headwaters watershed, 64% of the High Risk Area has been treated (after 2021), prior to 2018 only 8% of the High Risk Area had been treated. The RRFSP has leveraged Clean Water Fund dollars with over $5 million in private, state, and federal dollars to support conservation efforts. If CWF dollars from other agencies is excluded, over $3.5 million has been leveraged.                                                                                                                                                                               The Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project (RRV DWM) is evaluating drainage water management on operating farms as a practice to mitigate flooding and add water quality and quantity benefits. The project has shown that:  Controlled drainage is a viable option in the lake bottom landscape of the Red River Basin During 2017-2020, controlled drainage reduced nitrate-N losses by 22% and reduced drainage volume by over 13% compared to conventional subsurface drainage During 2018-2020, a saturated buffer had capacity to treat 92% of the drainage water from an 11-acre research field and removed over 76% of the nitrate in the drainage water (including water through the bypass) Since 2015, nearly 3,500 people have been engaged in RRV DWM outreach presentations, and field days/events. (Overall: 49 presentations, 19 field days/events, 4 poster displays, 2 trade journal articles, 3 publications/reports, 2 data requests) The RRV DWM has leveraged Clean Water Fund dollars with over $1 million in private, Local Government Unit and federal dollars to support drainage research and outreach. Project is a partner site for the USDA-funded $5M Transforming Drainage project. ",,,,1106429,158252,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2021,1500000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2--S.F. No. 3, Art. 2","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,947074,155671,,5.34,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2020,1500000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2--S.F. No. 3, Art. 2","d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota Total dollars leveraged ","Edge-of-field monitoring 26 active edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational in 2020 Overall there have been 71 edge-of-field stations throughout the life of the program, some projects have ended. Data has been used for a variety of computer simulation and model calibrations including PTMApp, Adapt-N, SWAT, and the Runoff Risk Advisory Tool. It has been used in peer-reviewed journal articles and large meta-analysis. Data continues to be shared with local, state, and national partners, and local farmers to discuss the effectiveness of conservation practices, and continues to be used to support the State’s Watershed Approach. The data is referenced in numerous WRAPs reports. Outreach From 2015-2020, about 15,000 ag producers, crop advisers and Local Government Units participated in 327 education and outreach events. Funds leveraged From 2015-2020 about $6.5 million has been leveraged from edge-of-field sites to support conservation efforts For additional measures please refer to individual project pages. See ""related projects"". ","achieved proposed outcomes",,,1127427,159158,,6.9,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2019,1125000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1115022,135259,,7.0,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2018,1125000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1116970,188976,,7.0,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2017,1125000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1261327,151885,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2016,1125000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1320290,149902,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2015,1500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 2","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota   ","The MDA conducts on-farm demonstrations and evaluations to provide accurate data on water quality effects of specific practices and help farmers understand and adopt best management practices (BMPs). On-farm work is conducted at 17 sites using 37 automated monitoring stations. The MDA works closely with 20 local government partners across the state. To date, over 50 field days, tours and educational events have been held to share results with interested farmers, conservation professionals and other stakeholders. The number of data requests for information from edge-of-field monitoring sites continues to increase. For example, the National Weather Service has requested edge-of-field data to validate / calibrate their Runoff Risk Advisory Service. Specifically, they are interested to know if runoff is actually occurring at times when their predictive model suggests the likelihood is high. Other data requests have come from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program, Water Resources Center (U of M) and others.   ",,,,1049412,132877,,6.85,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2014,1500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 2","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,706285,94509,,8.5,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2013,775000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,272755,12945,,5.85,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2012,775000," M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,268985,10515,,5.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2010,695000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (d) $695,000 the first year and $1,570,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance related to ways agricultural practices contribute to restoring impaired waters and assist with the development of TMDL plans. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,706285,94509,,"1 FTE (2010), 3.95 FTE (2011)","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2025,2550000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(a)","$2,550,000 the first year and $2,550,000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring. ","In FY25 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 35 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,100 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will contract with the USGS to collect stream flow measurements at 30 sites.  Plans also include continued website upgrades to update all hydrologic websites to have the same look and ability to download multiple types of data for more than 5 stations at a time. ",,,,,,,,,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2024,2550000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(a)","$2,550,000 the first year and $2,550,000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring. ","In FY24 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 20 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,160 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will contract with the USGS to collect stream flow measurements at 30 sites.  Plans also include website upgrades to provide additional flow and water quality information and functionality of data downloads at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY24 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at 18 locations. We collected almost 1,100 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected stream flow measurements at 30 sites. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state and continuous water quality data collected by MPCA are now available on our Cooperative Stream Gaging website. ",,,,2094641,359526,,14.6,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2023,2000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring ","In FY23 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading three gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,150 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will contract with the USGS to collect stream flow measurements at 30 sites.  Plans also include website upgrades to provide additional flow and water quality information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY23 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at five locations. We collected almost 1,190 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected stream flow measurements at 30 sites. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state. ",,,,1762341,301473,,14.8,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2022,2000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring ","In FY22 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading four gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,300 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. Plans also include website upgrades to provide additional flow and water quality information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY22 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at four locations. We collected almost 1,180 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected stream flow measurements at 30 sites. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state. ",,,,1704137,237200,,13.95,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2021,2000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring. ","In FY21 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 4 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1100 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will continue contracting with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to develop regional bedload and suspended-sediment datasets from the sediment samples taken at 50 sites between 2007-2020. Plans also include website upgrades to provide higher-resolution flow information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY21 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at three locations. We collected 1140 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS finished their bedload sediment transport project and wrote the final report. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state including adding additional map layers such as the US Drought Monitor and additional parameters such as water quality collected by our partners at MPCA. ",,,,1777467,224390,,15.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2020,2000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring. ","In FY20 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 12 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1300 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will continue contracting with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to collect up to 30 sediment samples at the 50 sites sampled between 2007-2019 to fill gaps needed to assess bedload sediment transport. Plans also include website upgrades to provide higher-resolution flow information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY20 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at 8 locations. We collected 1257 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected sediment at 30 sites to assess bedload sediment transport. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state. ",,,,1734450,242562,,15.4,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2019,1950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1950000 the first year and $1950000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY19 the DNR will expand the stream monitoring network with one additional gage and upgrade 10 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1 300 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will continue contracting with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to collect sediment in seven streams to assess bedload sediment transport. Plans also include website upgrades to provide higher-resolution flow information at the existing stream gages across the state.","In FY19 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by adding 1 additional gage and upgrading equipment at 16 locations. We collected 1 349 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected sediment in 7 streams to assess bedload sediment transport. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state.",,,,1665825,221621,,15.5,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2018,1950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1950000 the first year and $1950000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY18 the DNR will upgrade the stream monitoring network by adding new equipment to three gages. We will collect approximately 1 300 stream flow measurements and compile over 200 records at continuous stream gage sites for use in watershed assessments throughout the state. We will continue to contract with the US Geological Survey (USGS) to collect sediment in 11 streams to assess bedload sediment transport. Finally as part of an overall upgrade to our cooperative data system we will continue to transition to a new more efficient database to house all of our stream flow and groundwater data.","In FY18 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading nine existing locations. We collected 1 511 stream flow measurements and compiled records for 60 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. The transition to a new more efficient database in FY18 resulted in fewer records compiled than the previous year. The transition is complete and the new cooperative data system holds all of our stream flow and groundwater data. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected sediment in 11 streams to assess bedload sediment transport.",,,,1875551,221437,,15.7,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2017,2000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","(a) $2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY17 the DNR will expand the stream monitoring network by adding five new gages. We will collect approximately 1 335 stream flow measurements and compile over 200 records at continuous stream gage sites for use in watershed assessments throughout the state. We will continue to contract with the US Geological Survey (USGS) to collect sediment in streams to assess bedload sediment transport. As part of an overall upgrade to our cooperative data system we will transition to a new more efficient database to house all of our stream flow and groundwater data.","In FY17 the DNR expanded the stream monitoring network with one additional stream gages and upgraded nine existing locations. We collected 1 345 stream flow measurements and compiled approximately 200 records at continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the US Geological Survey (USGS) collected sediment in streams at 11 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.",,,,1842779,183087,,16.1,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2016,2000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","(a) $2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY16 the DNR will continue to expand the stream monitoring network by adding 11 new gages. We will collect 1300 stream flow measurements and compile 180 records for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. We will also contract with the USGS to collect sediment in streams at 10 sites to assess bedload sediment transport. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website will be upgraded to provide more features and easier access including a mobile platform and additional data.","In FY16 the DNR expanded the stream monitoring network with five additional stream gages and upgraded six existing locations. We collected 1 255 stream flow measurements and compiled 220 records at continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the US Geological Survey (USGS) collected sediment in streams at 11 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.",,,,1706951,184191,,16.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2015,2000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring including the installation of additional monitoring gauges and monitoring necessary to determine the relationship between stream flow and groundwater. ","In FY15 the DNR will continue to expand the stream monitoring network by adding 30 new gages. Scientists will collect 950 stream flow measurements and compile 180 records for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. The DNR will also contract with the USGS to collect sediment in streams at 13 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.","In FY15 DNR scientists installed or upgraded 22 new gages as part of ongoing work to establish and maintain a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. Many of these sites now have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. We installed fewer gages than proposed because of difficulty accessing some sites because fewer new gages are needed in some watersheds. We collected 1 173 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages that are used in in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. We compiled 116 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR-operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. We compiled fewer records than proposed because we had fewer trained staff to do the work. New staff are now trained are working on reviewing and compiling the backlogged records. This work is done in cooperation with MPCA; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for identifying impaired waters. We also contracted with the USGS to collect 258 samples of sediment in streams from 13 sites to assess bedload and suspended sediment transport and we provided hydrologic analyses of historical data and modeling for seven watersheds. This information helps evaluate surface water and ground water quantities over time.",,,,2072048,192587,,13.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2014,2000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring including the installation of additional monitoring gauges and monitoring necessary to determine the relationship between stream flow and groundwater. ","In FY14 DNR will continue to expand the stream monitoring network by adding 30 new gages. Scientists will collect 1 000 stream flow measurements and compile 130 records for continuous real-time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. DNR will also contract with the USGS to collect sediment in streams at 20 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.","In FY14 DNR scientists installed or upgraded 36 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. Many of these sites now have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. Scientists collected 853 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. Staff compiled 163 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR-operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. DNR also contracted with the USGS to collect 126 samples of sediment in streams to assess bedload sediment transport. Staff also provided hydrologic analyses of historical data for three major watersheds. This information aids in evaluating surface water and ground water quantities through time and the potential causes for these changes. This work is done in cooperation with MPCA; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for identifying impaired waters.",,,,1738591,148338,,13.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2013,1825000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1825000 the first year and $1825000 the second year are for the continuation and expansion of stream flow monitoring.","In FY13 DNR will continue to grow the stream monitoring network by adding 20 new gages. Scientists will collect 1080 stream flow measurements and compile 150 records for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds.","In FY13 DNR scientists installed or upgraded 19 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. All of these sites now have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. Field staff collected 710 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. Hydrologists compiled 116 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. DNR also contracted with the USGS to collect 127 samples of sediment in streams to assess bedload sediment transport. The number of records and samples is significantly smaller than proposed because of a drought that caused low or zero flow conditions. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters.",,,,1407259,172634,,8.0,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2012,1825000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1825000 the first year and $1825000 the second year are for the continuation and expansion of stream flow monitoring.","In FY12 DNR will continue to grow the stream monitoring network by adding 22 new gages. An additional 330 stream flow measurements will be collected 30 records will be compiled for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters. DNR will also coordinate with MPCA’s lake monitoring to install lake level gages on priority lakes and continue to ensure stream gage and flow measurement data are available for critical flood forecasting if needed.","In FY12 DNR scientists installed 8 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. Some of these sites have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. Field staff collected 919 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds and compiled 131 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds.",,,,973186,263700,,6.0,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2011,865000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","* Maintain existing network of 65 stream gages used for TMDL studies * Install calibrate stream 11 new streamflow gages with satellite telemetry for real time data access * Hydrology/hydraulic analysis of lake outlets at 10 lakes to support TMDL work * Develop interagency Monitoring Plan for surface and groundwater","In FY11 DNR scientists installed 2 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network to allow automated continuous measurements to be taken at sites across the state. Some of these sites have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. This is in addition to the 4 new gages and 4 upgraded gages installed in FY10. Field staff collected 334 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds and compiled 30 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. In FY10 field staff collected 323 stream flow measurements and compiled 28 annual daily flow quantity records. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters.",,,,,,,,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2010,645000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.",,"In FY 10 DNR scientists installed 4 new gages and upgraded 4 gages in a stream gage network to allow automated continuous measurements to be taken across the state. Field staff collected 323 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds and compiled 28 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters.",,,,,,,,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
10004485,"Students Engaging Local Watersheds Using Mobile Technologies",2016,147000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 05d","$147,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources for an agreement with Twin Cities Public Television to deliver an experiential, project-based educational program using mobile technologies to empower at least 200 middle school students in 4-H programs to engage in understanding and protecting local water resources.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"Twin Cities Public Television","Non-Profit Business/Entity",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_05d.pdf,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund",Completed,,,Joan,Freese,"Twin Cities Public Television","172 Fourth St E","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 229-1339",jfreese@tpt.org,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/students-engaging-local-watersheds-using-mobile-technologies-0,,,,
34094,Suburbia,2016,677580,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Goal: museum attendance greater than 102,000 in FY15-16 during run of Suburbia. The surveyed Net Promoter Score of +45 for adults fell short of the goal of +50 or higher, while families with children exceeded goal at +51. 92% of visitors rated the exhibit experience ""Excellent"" or ""Very Good"". 95% of adult visitors and family visitors agreed that Suburbia ""Increased [my/our] knowledge of Minnesota history, places and culture"" and ""Increased [my/our] appreciation for MNHS as a meaningful recreation experience"".",,,,,677580,32740,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",3.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","This 5,000-square-foot exhibit opened Oct. 14, 2015, and tells the story of the population exodus from the central cities to the developing Twin Cities suburbs",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/suburbia,,,,
34072,"Sustainability of Programs & Facilities",2016,125779,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","MNHS's accomplishment of 15 percent greenhouse gas emission reductions has saved an estimated $1.8 million in energy and water costs in the last five years. The foundation of this work is built in data gathering, measurement and evaluation. In the future, the sustainability program will look to merge major facilities renovations with more energy, water, and indoor air quality goals and seek out more opportunities to communicate our successes to Minnesotans and to the wider museum field.",,,250000,"National Endowment for the Humanities.",125779,13885,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",1.30,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS continues to strive for environmental, economic, and social sustainability in the fifth year of its sustainability program. Staff and visitors are engaged with sustainability through the project's ""More for the Mission"" campaign. Recent energy-efficiency projects within our facilities have allowed us to achieve the five-year goal of 15 percent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Progress continues on a cold and cool storage energy efficiency investigation begun in previous years to assist MNHS improve its long-term film storage preservation metric and well as create annual energy savings by rethinking and upgrading the mechanical system configuration. During FY15, MNHS received a second National Endowment for the Humanities Sustaining Cultural Heritage Grant focused on implementation of the study funded by the first grant. Implementation planning is underway, with construction slated for FY18. The sustainability program continues to receive recognition for its impact in the museum and history organization community. In spring 2015, MNHS's sustainability program was featured in Environmental Sustainability at History Museums and Historic Sites, by Sarah Sutton. MNHS's sustainability program metrics and cold storage project case study have been recognized nationally. MNHS's accomplishment of 15 percent greenhouse gas emission reductions has saved an estimated $1.8 million in energy and water costs in the last five years. In the future, the sustainability program will look to merge major facilities renovations with more energy, water, and indoor air quality goals and seek out more opportunities to communicate our successes to Minnesotans and to the wider museum field.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Capital Development/Rehabilitation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Planning, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sustainability-programs-facilities,,,,
34121,"Teaching Heritage Collaboative",2016,65523,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","Increased use of MNHS resources for instruction by U of M faculty. Assignment of graduate student interns to build on research of the archaeological collections related to Historic Fort Snelling. Increased collaboration between U of M faculty and MNHS staff in the development of collaborative instruction.",,,,,65523,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The U of M and MNHS are collaborating to enhance heritage education across Minnesota. This project engages students in field experiences with the archaeological collections and interpretive programs at Historic Fort Snelling and is providing research support for new programs at the Oliver Kelley Farm. These projects will help build models for collaborative instruction that fosters cultural heritage awareness and protection. Through the projects, the students will be exposed to the breadth of Minnesota's diverse artifacts, sites, stories, and traditions, thus nurturing future generations of professionals who understand the interdisciplinary and collaborative nature of heritage and preservation work. Secondary benefits of this initiative include building better community-institutional relationships and fostering broader public support for cultural heritage awareness and protection.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/teaching-heritage-collaboative,,,,
36609,"The Visible Invisibility of the Dakhóta Language in Minnesota - Competitive Award",2016,20000,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$300,000 the first year is for a competitive grants program to provide grants to preserve and promote the cultural heritage of Minnesota.Of this amount, $50,000 in the first year is for a grant to the city of St. Paul to plan and design a garden to commemorate unrepresented cultural gardens in Phalen Park in the city of St. Paul and $150,000 in the first year is for a grant to Ramsey County to develop and install activity facilities in Ramsey County parks for culturally relevant games that are reflective of the current demographics in Ramsey County.The Minnesota Humanities Center shall operate a competitive grants program to provide grants for programs, including but not limited to: music, film, television, radio, recreation, or the design and use of public spaces that preserves and honors the cultural heritage of Minnesota. Grants made under this paragraph must not be used for travel costs inside or outside of the state.","A greater understanding of Dakhóta language loss in Minnesota amongst Dakhóta language studentsImprovement in speaking aptitude and increase in language use amongst Dakhóta studentsCreation of Dakhóta language archive materials, andHigh quality and pedagogically consistent curriculum available for school and student use. ","Over the course of the project, we recorded over 50 historical Dakota songs and the accompanying stories.Served 170,000 Dakota people as well as the general populace of Minnesota.",,,,20000,,"Wayne Bendickson; Neil McKay; John Reynolds; Wil Meya; Clifford Canku; Katie Blue",,"Dakhota Iapi Okhodakichiye","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Dakhóta Iápi Okhódakichiye will conduct a series of interviews with first language speakers of the Dakhóta language to understand the systematic absence of Minnesota's first language through a Dakhóta lens. The project has three objectives: 1) Understand the systematic absence of the Dakhóta language from Minnesota, 2) Understand language loss and revitalization from a Dakhóta perspective, and 3) Create Dakhóta language curriculum and archive (bilingual) from the transcripts. ",,,2015-11-02,2017-01-31,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Ethan,Neerdaels,"Dakhota Iapi Okhodakichiye",,,,,"920-412-6002 ",ethan@dakhota.org,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/visible-invisibility-dakh-ta-language-minnesota-competitive-award,,,,
34097,"The Over Here Project",2016,278507,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Outcome goals: MHC attendance greater than 240,000 in FY17. Net Promoter Score goal +50 or higher. Increased interest in, knowledge of and appreciation for history among adults visiting without children. Increased appreciation of MNHS and its programs among adults visiting without children.",,,,,278507,37822,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",3.50,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Over Here project will be a new traveling exhibit created by Minnesota History Center staff and focused on America during the World War I-era, 1914-1919. The 5,000-square-foot exhibit will depict the era as a dramatic time in American history when the nation grappled with massive upheavals brought on by social movements, mobility, and modernity at home, while exerting its growing military, industrial, and cultural influence abroad. Visitors will gain a better understanding of this tumultuous period",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/over-here-project,,,,
34122,"The Heritage Partnership Program",2016,400000,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","Grant applicants are required to describe the program's anticipated impact by developing short-term, intermediate, and long-term evaluation metrics in order to evaluate success. For example, by determining how best to share resources, staffing, or services among organizations, the partnering applicants could estimate cost savings and demonstrate efficiency gained.",,,,,400000,,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.00,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Through a competitive process, the Heritage Partnership Program awards grants to historical organizations statewide to support programs that will build the capacity of partnering organizations to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural resources. The program supports the creation and development of sustainable, history-based partnerships throughout the state.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Howard,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3000,,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/heritage-partnership-program,,,,
34110,"Together in Time: Programs for People with Memory Loss",2016,55437,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (3) Parternships","$2,060,000 the first year and $2,140,000 the second year are for partnerships involving multiple organizations, which may include the Minnesota Historical Society, to preserve and enhance access to Minnesota's history and cultural heritage in all regions of the state.","Create programs for individuals with memory loss and their caregivers at different stages (healthy and active older adults, early stage/caregiving and mid to late stage/caregiving). Have 80 percent or higher scores by participants to strongly agree/agree on the following outcomes: 1) programs increased their personal connection with history; 2) programs were welcoming and inclusive of their identit(ies); and 3) programs increased their awareness and appreciation of the value of family and community history",,,91408,"IMLS Museums for America",55437,6264,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",0.60,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Together in Time project meets the needs of a diverse, aging population by empowering them as lifelong learners, encouraging them to tell stories, and by supporting their caregivers in carrying out their essential roles. Core elements of the program include leading programs in multiple locations for those with memory loss and their caregivers and working on tools such as a mobile app to show objects from MNHS's collections in order to spark conversations. As part of this project, staff work with the African American and Latino communities to build relationships and better understand how to serve their unique memory loss and cultural needs.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/together-time-programs-people-memory-loss,,,,
10004469,"Trap Shooting Sports Facility Grants",2016,132000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 05a","$132,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources for trap shooting sports facility grants under Minnesota Statutes, section 87A.10.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"MN DNR","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_05a.pdf,2015-07-01,2017-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Niska,"MN DNR","500 Lafayette Rd","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(612) 756-4165",chuck.niska@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/trap-shooting-sports-facility-grants-0,,,,
10004442,"Turtle Population Dynamics in an Urban Lake",2016,250000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03m","$250,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources for an agreement with the University of St. Thomas in cooperation with the Three Rivers Park District to analyze the aquatic and terrestrial habitat for certain reptile species in urban lakes and to make specific recommendations to protect and enhance the habitat. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2019, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"University of St. Thomas","Private College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03m.pdf,2015-07-01,2019-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Jennifer,McGuire,"St. Thomas University","2115 Summit Ave","St. Paul",MN,55105,"(651) 962-5221",jtmcguire@stthomas.edu,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/turtle-population-dynamics-urban-lake-0,,,,
10004446,"Understanding Water Scarcity, Threats, and Values to Improve Management",2016,234000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 04a","$234,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to model and map statewide water scarcity and abundance; assess water-related risks to industry, municipalities, and ecosystems; and quantify the economic values of changes in water quality and quantity in order to inform long-term water sustainability strategies. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"U of MN","Public College/University",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_04a.pdf,2015-07-01,2019-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Bonnie,Keeler,"U of MN","1954 Buford Ave","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(651) 353-9294",keeler@umn.edu,,"University of Minnesota ",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/understanding-water-scarcity-threats-and-values-improve-management-0,,,,
34296,"University of Minnesota Stormwater Research",2016,550000,,,,,,,,,,,6.4,"University of Minnesota: Sponsored Projects Administration","Public College/University","Cognizant to the needs of the stormwater community, a group that has engaged in stormwater research at the University of Minnesota (UMN) has developed a research program for the biennium that addresses pressing needs: a stormwater research roadmap and framework for priority needs, research required to improve stormwater pond maintenance, and information transfer related to these needs. These research components and their results have significant implications and practicality to the stormwater research community, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, local units of government, and other stakeholders.",,,2016-04-27,2018-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jeffrey,Peterson,"University of Minnesota: Sponsored Projects Administration","450 McNamara Center 200 Oak Street Southeast",Minneapolis,MN,55455-2070,"(612) 626-7441",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring, Planning, Research","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/university-minnesota-stormwater-research,,,,
10004458,"Updating the National Wetland Inventory for Minnesota - Phase V",2016,1500000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 76, Sec. 2, Subd. 03e","$1,500,000 the first year is from the trust fund to the commissioner of natural resources to continue to update and enhance wetland inventory maps for Minnesota. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018, by which time the project must be completed and final products delivered.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.","Click on Work Plan under Project Details.",,,,,,,,"MN DNR","State Government",,,http://www.lccmr.leg.mn/projects/2015/work_plans_may/_2015_03e.pdf,2015-07-01,2018-06-30,"Environment & Natural Resources Trust Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"MN DNR","500 Lafayette Rd, Box 25","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5164",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/updating-national-wetland-inventory-minnesota-phase-v-0,,,,
36610,"Veterans' Voices: Native Warriors - Competitive Award",2016,20000,"2015 Minn. Laws, Chap. 2 Art. 4 Sec. 2 Subd. 8","$300,000 the first year is for a competitive grants program to provide grants to preserve and promote the cultural heritage of Minnesota.The Minnesota Humanities Center shall operate a competitive grants program to provide grants for programs, including but not limited to: music, film, television, radio, recreation, or the design and use of public spaces that preserves and honors the cultural heritage of Minnesota. Grants made under this paragraph must not be used for travel costs inside or outside of the state.","Twenty stories of Native American Veterans, that would otherwise remain absent, will be shared, amplified, and archived for future generations.By hearing the stories, at least 220,000 Minnesotans of all ages will gain a better understanding of the important role Native Americans have served in protecting our country, the unusually high percentage of Native Americans who have and are in the armed forces, and the cultural reasons behind this.More teachers will utilize this material and other tangible examples from people within their communities who are demonstrating how and why the Native Warriors protect the land, are good stewards of natural resources, and are generous in service to others.When surveyed, teachers will report Native American students will have a stronger sense of self-pride, will be more engaged in history classes, and will develop a stronger commitment to protect the land.Teachers will report that students are more engaged in learning about this topic.","The 90-second segments aired on Ampers stations statewide reaching an estimated 330,000 people.The three-minute segments aired in and around: St. Cloud; Thief River Falls; Minneapolis/St. Paul; Fond du Lac/Cloquet; Leech Lake/Cass Lake; White Earth/Callaway; and Bois Forte/Nett Lake.",,,,20000,,"Maggie Montgomery, President; Michele Jansen, At-Large; Debbie Benedict, Vice President; Vickie Jacoba, At Large; Doug Westerman, Treasurer; Sara Miller, At-Large; Pam Hill-Kroyer, Secretary",,"Association of Minnesota Public Educational Radio Stations (Ampers)","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Veterans' Voices: Native Warriors will give Native American students in Minnesota the opportunity to hear memories and stories directly from Native American veterans from within their communities. Funds will also be used to create radio segments featuring the Native American veterans sharing their personal experiences in their own words. These segments will air statewide and be archived online giving all Minnesotans access now and in the future. ",,,2015-11-02,2017-01-31,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund",Completed,,,Joel,Glaser,"Association of Minnesota Public Educational Radio Stations (Ampers)",,,,,651-686-5367,jglaser@ampers.org,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Humanities Center",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/veterans-voices-native-warriors-competitive-award,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2024,,,,"In FY24, the DNR has sunset its CWF watershed modeling activities. Instead, program staff will primarily be focusing on the culvert replacement incentive program funded by the CWF. The Cascade Creek hydrology study will be completed under the nonpoint technical assistance program. Outcomes from this effort will be reported in that section of the report. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2023,,,,"In FY23 DNR will complete the water storage sensitivity analysis for cover crops using at least two existing watershed models. The goal is to provide local watershed planning groups with a simple approach to estimate water storage benefits from different levels of cover crop adoption. The DNR is also initiating a second effort to provide guidance on water storage benefits that looks at the benefits of channel restoration and reconnecting them to their floodplains. ","The DNR initiated a study on the Cascade Creek restoration project with the aim to quantify the hydrologic benefit of providing water storage through channel restoration and reconnecting floodplains. DNR completed modeling analysis of water storage benefits of cover crops and presented this work at the Minnesota Water Resources Conference as well as at several other internal and external venues. Data from the watershed modeling effort was provided to the USACE Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), to incorporate into their research efforts. ",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2022,,,,"Program priorities in FY22 include technical support for geomorphic design of stream crossings and expanded analysis and dissemination of the results from the evaluation of hydrologic change. Specific projects for this geomorphic design of stream crossings will include Dry Creek and Gorman Creek. DNR will continue to develop methods and tools to improve efficiency of the analysis and design process. We will also seek additional opportunities to enhance and expand this effort by collaborating with other agencies and organizations. DNR will also assist with the ongoing statewide analysis of hydrologic change including the synthesis of results into statewide maps depicting patterns in climate and stream flow. Help develop watershed hydrology report cards to improve the communication of these results to local partners and other state agencies involved in watershed planning efforts. ","The DNR was expanded upon previous watershed modeling efforts. Modeling for the Dobbins Creek Watershed was completed in the previous year to help Mower County SWCD quantify the benefits of their best management practices. This year, the results from this were incorporated into a document and presented as a case study for a two-day hydrology workshop. In addition, program staff initiated a new effort to use existing models to conduct a sensitivity analysis on the water storage benefits of cover crops. When complete, this work will be useful a useful guide for local watershed when developing the water storage strategy required as part of One Watershed One Plan. ",,,,72509,6760,,0.5,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2021,165000,,,"In FY21 program staff will continue efforts to expand modeling capabilities. One area of interest is exploring options for incorporating downscaled climate model results into GSSHA to simulate climate change impacts. Staff are participating in the project funded by the Water Research Foundation to look at innovative approaches for flood mitigation planning and under extreme wet weather events. We will also continue to engage with watershed modelers at the University of Minnesota to improve our processes. This will include exploring the applications of machine learning to predict watershed hydrological changes under the impacts of climate and land use changes. Clean Water modeling applications for FY 21 include completing the analysis of Dobbins Creek watershed and a report evaluating best management practices and a second report evaluating impact of agricultural drainage tile. We also anticipate using the model develop the Dry Creek (Olmsted County) to study land-use scenarios climate change and effects of various stressors on floodplain and channel connectivity. Finally staff will continue to provide technical support for the evaluation of hydrologic change analysis for the remaining gaged watersheds and assist with report.","DNR watershed modeling staff completed a report for Dobbins Creek watershed on the effectiveness of BMPs to address water quality and flooding issues. A separate report was completed that analyzed the effect of drain tiles and cover crops. Results from these reports were shared with state and local partners through presentations and factsheets. DNR provided technical support for stream channel stability and geomorphic design for potential culvert replacement projects. This program promotes a natural design approach for stream crossings to reduce flooding and erosion as well as improve fish passage. As part of this effort DNR developed a model for Dry Creek to assess hydrology and sediment transport. DNR is involved in several other potential stream crossing design projects throughout southern and central Minnesota. DNR also continued to play a key role in implementing a standardized approach for evaluating altered stream hydrology. The evaluation of hydrologic change was completed for 63 stream gages across Minnesota. DNR is using this information to develop plain language communications aimed at participants in local watershed planning efforts.",,,,131364,6473,,0.8,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2020,170000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY20 DNR watershed modelers will: -Continuing to work with the Minnesota Supercomputer Institute to adapt GSSHA for the supercomputer in order to increase modeling program capacity. -Explore potential collaboration with the University of Minnesota using machine learning to improve watershed modeling and management. -Run additional scenarios for Shakopee Creek tributary model. -Run drain tile scenario and additional land use scenario for Shakopee Creek parent model. -Finish calibration and validation of Huse Creek model. -Develop and run model scenarios for Dobbins Creek to assess effectiveness of proposed management activities on reducing peak flow. -Help finalize the methods guidance document for altered hydrology tools and assist with staff training on procedures. ","Clean Water modeling program staff continued to explore avenues for expanding modeling capacity. Staff participated in a symposium hosted by the University of Minnesota focused on using machine learning to improve watershed modeling and management. Program staff extended existing modeling applications for Dobbins Creek GSSHA (Mower County) model to analyze water quality and flooding issues. Staff developed and ran model scenarios to assess effectiveness of proposed management activities on reducing peak flow. Additional scenarios were run to evaluate the impact of agricultural drainage tiles and perennial cover on hydrology. Program staff also played a key role in developing a comprehensive standardized approach to evaluate altered hydrology for streams. Staff provided technical support for method development developed programming scripts to automate the analysis assisted with training and helped write the documentation. In addition staff assisted with a pilot project to implement these analysis methods.",,,,84437,16527,,0.8,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2019,165000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY19 DNR watershed modelers will: • Work with the Cedar River Watershed District to model the effect of adopted and proposed land use practices on flood flows and water quality. • Finalize and provide report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) on a Shakopee Creek tributary report assessing the effect of six land use scenarios on hydrology and sediment transport. • Help refine the DNR’s approach to evaluating watershed hydrologic change. Help review altered hydrology assessment techniques and train staff to do the assessments. • Collaborate with the University of Minnesota Supercomputing Institute and the ACE on developing steps to use the supercomputer to simulate how land use changes may alter hydrology sediment and nutrient processes to better address clean water initiatives. This will result in faster more efficient simulations `and more representative presentations.",,,,,84437,16527,,0.8,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2018,176762,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY18 DNR watershed modelers will: • Finalize a report on the Discovery Farms modeling project in Goodhue County and present key findings at the 2017 MN Water Resources Conference. • Continue to collaborate with modeling experts at the University of MN and the Army Corp of Engineers to evaluate and improve limitations in the current suite of models including developing and evaluating values for sediment transport parameters. • Collaborate with the MN Pollution Control Agency in using the larger Shakopee Creek Watershed model developed in FY17 to help evaluate water quality benefits for the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR)’s Working Lands Watershed Restoration Program. • Continue to collaborate with Mower County Soil & Water Conservation District on how to use watershed models to help document measureable improvements as on-the-ground projects are implemented. • Finalize a report on previous years’ Shakopee Creek modeling efforts for the MN River Integrated Watershed Study. • Incorporate results from watershed modeling studies into a DNR report on altered hydrology at the request of the interagency Drainage Management Team led by BWSR. • Work with the Discovery Farm Program’s technical team to identify additional modeling priorities and next steps. • Gain access to a University of MN supercomputer to reduce model run times.","In FY18 DNR watershed modelers: • Provided final report to the Discovery Farm in Goodhue County describing the modeled results relating the effect of existing land use practices and proposed best management practices on the hydrologic sediment and nutrient processes. • Provided the final report on the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) Working Lands Shakopee Creek project to BWSR and presented results at the 2018 MN Water Resources Conference. Simulated the effect of BWSR and DNR recommended land use changes on hydrologic sediment and nutrient processes. • Provided technical assistance on hydrology sediment and nutrient -process modeling in the GSSHA model to a University of Minnesota researcher.",,,,114407,47765,,1.1,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2017,202000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY17 the DNR will: • Complete Shakopee Creek modeling and summarize the results in a detailed report on land management scenarios for local watershed initiatives and decision-support products being developed by the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study partnership. • Work with the Cedar River Watershed District to evaluate one or more BMP strategies review BMP effectiveness and complete a report on project outcomes. • Sponsor a University of Minnesota research project to compare the ability of existing GSSHA vs. SWAT models for Dobbins Creek to predict rates of nutrient loss. • Expand modeling at existing Discovery Farm sites to add nutrient loss rates and sediment erosion to BMP evaluations. • Develop a fine-scale GSSHA model to test its capacity to help inform decisions on proposed drainage improvement projects and selection of associated BMPs. • Present modeling results at an International Drainage Symposium hosted by the University of Minnesota. • Continue to provide technical expertise to drainage-related technical and policy workgroups and issues in various forums. ","In FY17 DNR watershed modelers: • Collaborated with modeling experts at the University of MN and the Army Corp of Engineers to evaluate the capacity to model nutrient loss rates identify modeling limitations and discuss potential solutions. • Completed a modeling project with Discovery Farms Program (Goodhue County site); expanded the model to include sediment transport and nutrient loss estimates; examined water quality benefits associated with practices that increase soil organic content; completed a draft report and presented the results. • Gave four presentations at a University of MN International Drainage Symposium highlighting key areas of learning from the DNR’s watershed modeling work. • Finished Shakopee Creek modeling runs of six alternative land management scenarios to help inform local watershed initiatives and decision-support products being developed by the MN River Integrated Watershed Study partnership. Presented the results at several forums. • Collaborated with Mower County Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) to complete a model predicting the reduction in sediment erosion and hydrologic flow when all projects in the Cedar River Watershed District’s Targeted Watershed grant project are implemented. Presented the results to SWCD staff and discussed how to track future implementation success. • Continued to provide technical expertise to drainage-related technical and policy workgroups. • Developed a GSSHA model for the larger Shakopee Creek Watershed to enhance comparisons with MPCA’s modeling products. ",,,,10622,44566,,1.4,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2016,202000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY16 the DNR will collaborate with the Army Corps of Engineers and other partners of the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study to complete fine-scale modeling and translate products into guidance for selecting best management practices at the basin scale. We will complete model scenarios for Shakopee Creek case studies and start developing “scaling” rules to help translate field-research findings on BMP effectiveness into decision-support guidance for restoration and protection efforts throughout the Minnesota River Basin. We will continue the Discovery Farms research by further developing the field-scale GSSHA models of selected research plots using data collected during edge of field monitoring. The model format for Discovery Farms data is designed to help the Minnesota Agricultural Water Resource Center evaluate how well BMPs work over a wider range of climatic conditions compared to the actual period the practices were monitored. We will also support a Cedar River Watershed District (CRWD) watershed restoration initiative by refining an existing GSSHA model for Dobbins Creek to evaluate one or more BMP implementation strategies identified by the CRWD. We will continue to work with MPCA’s HSPF model on the St. Louis River Watershed. We will adapt the Swedish RIM “RIM” model or “Riparian Profile Flow-Concentration Model ” for use with HSPF to model a number of parameters in the St. Louis River (dissolved organic carbon total mercury methylmercury iron and sulfate concentrations). We will incorporate an extensive set of chemical and flow data collected in 2013 by the DNR into the model. This involves extending MPCA’s initial hydrologic calibration from 2012 to 2014","In FY16 the DNR used fine-scale GSSHA modeling results to support several projects and partnerships to improve the selection placement and design of agricultural best management practices (BMPs) in southern Minnesota. Specifically we: -Continued collaborating with the Army Corps of Engineers and other Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study partners to complete fine-scale modeling in the Shakopee and Seven-Mile Creek subwatersheds and develop products to guide the selection of BMPs at the basin scale. -Developed and delivered modeling results to the Chippewa River Board and stakeholders to guide planning efforts to reestablish shallow lakes that were previously drained. -Assembled a video for the Smithsonian WaterWays Exhibit showing how hydrologic models can help guide management decisions to protect important recreational lakes in the Shakopee Creek system. -Completed models for two Discovery Farm sites that will be used by the Minnesota Agricultural Water Resource Center and partnering farmers. The models indicate that changes in soil organic matter content and modifications to tile drainage practices will reduce runoff and soil erosion and increase soil water availability. -Completed three models at different scales for the Dobbins Creek Watershed to help the Cedar River Watershed District decide which BMPs to implement as part of the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR)’s Targeted Watershed Grant Program. -Continued providing technical expertise to drainage-related technical and policy workgroups and issues in various forums. Staff in the DNR Division of Lands & Minerals collaborated with MPCA staff to write a peer-reviewed paper published in the Journal of Environmental Management about the St. Louis River research described in the proposed outcomes above for FY16.",,,,277403,44144,,2.4,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2015,185000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY15 the DNR will collaborate with the Army Corps of Engineers and other Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study partners to complete fine-scale modeling and translate products into best management practice (BMP) guidance at the basin scale. Staff will complete model scenarios for Shakopee Creek case studies and start developing “scaling” rules to help translate field-research findings on BMP effectiveness into decision-support guidance for restoration and protection efforts throughout the Minnesota River Basin. In coordination with the MN Agricultural Water Resource Center and MN Department of Agriculture modelers will aid Discovery Farms research by developing field-scale GSSHA models of selected research plots to help evaluate BMP effectiveness and reduce uncertainty in interpreting the monitored data. A model format for Discovery Farms data will help evaluate BMP effectiveness over a wider range of climatic conditions than occurred during the monitoring period and improve site-to-site comparisons. Staff will also support a Cedar River Watershed District (CRWD) watershed restoration initiative by refining an existing GSSHA model for Dobbins Creek to incorporate drainage tile so the effects of tile drainage practices can be accurately evaluated together with other BMPs. The results will help refine BMPs recommendations. The DNR will continue collaborating with soil scientists to understand and model soil health management to support drainage and water quality goals. Staff will compile soil health research from multiple sources to ensure the best science is used to explain how soil characteristics change in response to changing tillage practices and other BMPs and accurately incorporate soil physics into reliable model parameters. Staff will continue to coordinate with the Drainage Work Group and provide technical support for the Drainage Management Team as they review Minnesota’s drainage policies and code.","In FY15 the DNR continued to work with the Army Corps of Engineers and other Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study (MRIWS) partners. The goal is to improve the predictions these models make about the effectiveness of potential watershed restoration activities. We developed a tool that will help combine land use land cover and crop management practices with soil type in the model which will estimate differences in water flow as these relationships change. Maps showing locations for targeted BMPs that will significantly reduce sediment loading are being used by local SWCDs to work with individual landowners. The use of detailed maps at a fine scale in this targeting exercise demonstrates the value of the GSSHA modeling in identifying the effectiveness of BMP implementation at both field and watershed scales. We worked with the Discovery Farms research team to develop a field-scale GSSHA model based on actual monitoring data. The model gives a detailed summary of water balance with and without a pattern tile drainage system for both corn and soybean rotations helping evaluate BMP effectiveness and interpret monitoring data in a pattern tiled field. The DNR’s mining hydrologists worked with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to enhance their HSPF (Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran) model for the St. Louis River watershed by: 1) improving the mining discharge information in the model and; 2) developing user input files that incorporate “chemical tracers” to mine waters so that impacts from mining and other activities can be evaluated more quickly and accurately. This work will help better identify sources of pollution problems make mine permitting decisions and target restoration plans.",,,,170831,41287,,1.9,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2014,185000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY14 the DNR watershed modeling team will continue its work with the Cannon River stakeholders and use the modeling experience developed for the Maple Creek Subwatershed to evaluate how to target and select BMPs for the adjacent Turtle Creek Subwatershed. The DNR watershed modeling team will complete the Shakopee Creek case studies (JD 27 and JD29) as well as third subwatershed (Huse Creek) which will serve as a reference watershed. The DNR will combine the results of the Shakopee Creek case studies with those of the Army COE modelers (who are modeling 7-Mile Creek) to address historical impacts of wetland loss and drainage in the Minnesota River Basin and to help develop a watershed strategy to address TMDL goals. The DNR’s Drainage Engineer will continue to coordinate with the Drainage Work Group on drainage policy and reshaping state drainage code. The modeling team will work cooperatively with University of Minnesota researchers and others to increase our understanding on how BMPs change soil properties that are used in models to interpret hydrologic response. The modeling team will also cooperate with University of Minnesota researchers on a pilot project that will help evaluate how drainage alters the value of land. This project may lead to improvements in determining the benefits and impacts from drainage and who should pay for maintenance of drainage systems and drainage system improvements that may benefit others than the landowners where the improvements are made.","In FY14 the DNR continued to work with the Army Corps Of Engineers and other partners involved in the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study (MRIWS). DNR’s three modeling case studies in the Shakopee Creek watershed were not completed. Instead effort was focused on stakeholder meetings and MRIWS team meetings to identify the specific series of landscape conditions (model scenarios) that need to be evaluated. Because improved soil health management will be a critical component of water restoration and protection strategies existing research on soil physics was carefully reviewed to insure that our models accurately represent those processes. Significant effort was also invested in FY14 to improve how climate and rainfall data are incorporated into our models. Climatic parameters are key drivers of how water (and pollutants) moves across and through landscapes. Accurately incorporating this information is critical if our modeling efforts are going to simulate physical processes in the landscape and provide reliable decision-support guidance. A guidance document on radar precipitation estimation was prepared. The DNR’s Drainage Engineer continued to provide expert technical input into the effort being led by the Board of Water and Soil Resources to review Minnesota’s drainage policy and code. Input was provided to both the Drainage Work Group (DWG) and the Drainage Management Team (DMT). The DNR continued to participate on the Interagency Clean Water Research Sub-Team led that prioritizes and guides research studies paid for by the clean water fund. These studies are designed to improve understanding of BMP effectiveness and develop guidance for targeting and installation of these beneficial practices. The Cannon River/Straight River GSSHA pilot study with the MPCA and Cannon River stakeholders is on hold after the lead modeler left state service. ",,,,122059,32439,,1.3,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2013,230000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY13 the DNR watershed modeling team will work with the Cannon River stakeholders to complete the Straight River prioritization of Management Zones (PMZs) in support of TMDL implementation strategies. A report summarizing this effort will be completed. The Shakopee Creek case studies will be completed to address impacts of wetland loss and drainage impacts with assessments reflecting historic land use changes. Coordination with the MRIWS team will help identify additional watershed assessment needs to begin the development of a strategy for targeting BMPs that will support the framework for a Decision Support System (DSS). A draft report of modeling outcomes will be prepared. CW Modeling Team will work with the States’ CW team to coordinate other critical modeling needs that can be initiated in FY13. The CW Drainage Engineer will continue to coordinate with the DWG and others doing drainage research to identify critical gaps in this research. ","In FY13 the DNR watershed modeling team worked with stakeholders in the Cannon River watershed to target and prioritize the placement of best management practices (BMPs) in the Maple Creek Subwatershed (part of the Straight River watershed). The analysis predicted that a combination of the most effective BMPs would reduce suspended sediment by up to 40% and reduce peak storm flows by up to 6% if implemented at realistic landowner adoption rates. The results provided information based on the specific characteristics of the Maple Creek subwatershed on how to target the types and locations of BMPs to maximize improvements in runoff quality and quantity. A draft report summarizing this effort was completed and is available to the partners for their inclusion in the development prioritized and targeted implementation activities. The Shakopee Creek case studies were not completed as scheduled in FY13 because the overall project is behind schedule due to reduced levels of federal funding. DNR’s watershed modeling team began establishing a process for incorporating radar derived precipitation estimates into the model so the model better represents that local rainfall conditions resulting in a more accurately calibrated model. DNR’s Drainage Engineer continues to coordinate with the Drainage Work Group and others doing drainage research to identify critical gaps in our knowledge and decision-support capacity. Coordination with the team developing the Agricultural Certification Pilot in Minnesota identified opportunities for using the GSSHA model to help document the effectiveness of that program to deliver desired outcomes and progress toward meeting TMDL goals. ",,,,266359,37517,,1.3,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2012,230000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY12 DNR hydrologists will apply the ""Gridded Subsurface Surface Hydrologic Analysis"" (GSSHA) model to evaluate BMP alternatives for clean water restoration and protection studies and will participate in Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team meetings to help identify research needs and shortcomings in outdated State Drainage Code language Modeling: * Calibrate Shakopee Creek wetland and lake restoration GSSHA models to support restoration and BMP prioritization efforts in Chippewa River Basin. * Finalize Straight River (Cannon River Watershed) GSSHA Model Calibrations for TSS and work with CRWP on Prioritizing Management Zones in Straight River Watershed in support of TMDL implementation.","In FY12 DNR watershed modelers updated data inputs for GSSHA models in Shakopee Creek and the Straight River to reflect more precise watershed characteristics now available with the release of detailed LiDAR digital terrain data. This improvement will result in improved modeling of BMP alternatives. Support for the Straight River TMDL implementation is under way. The Turtle Creek model has been calibrated and preliminary BMP targeting in the Maple Creek Watershed is being coordinated with our partners in the Cannon River Watershed. Work continues on the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study (MRIWS). Watershed modelers met to prioritize where case studies will be performed and to determine what issues are critical outcomes of these case studies. Work continues with the stakeholders in Shakopee Creek to determine critical outcomes from this case study and how this information will support the MRIWS. Desired outcomes will include wetland restoration benefits and impacts of lost storage due to drainage of shallow lakes. The Clean Water Drainage Engineer attended all Drainage Work Group (DWG) meetings in addition to supporting the CW research committee in reviewing grant applications for BWSR and MDA CW research. ",,,,107171,38473,,1.2,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2011,95000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY11 DNR hydrologists will apply ""Gridded Subsurface Surface Hydrologic Analysis"" (GSSHA) model to evaluate BMP alternatives for clean water restoration and protection studies: * Shakopee Creek wetland and lake restoration GSSHA analysis * Straight River (Cannon River Watershed) GSSHA Model Calibrations","In FY11 DNR hydrologists participated in all Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team meetings. Modeling: * Shakopee Creek: continued work with national science team to review model options that will provide the best framework for a decision support system that will give data access and guidance to stakeholders. * Prepared preliminary report on GSSHA model calibrations in the Straight River. Models will be used to better identify sources of sediment in the watershed for support of a clean water restoration (Total Maximum Daily Load) study.",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2010,85000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY10 DNR will apply the ""Gridded Subsurface Surface Hydrologic Analysis"" (GSSHA) model to evaluate BMP alternatives for clean water restoration and protection studies: * Cedar River culvert sizing * Shakopee Creek wetland and lake restoration * Straight River (Cannon River Watershed)","In FY10 DNR hydrologists participated in all Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Tram meetings. Modeling: * Finalized Cedar River culvert sizing analysis. Presented model results to local governments and watershed science peers. * Shakopee Creek: worked with national science team to review model options that will provide the best framework for a decision support system that will give data access and guidance to stakeholders. * Worked on GSSHA model calibration and refinement to better identify sources of sediment in the watershed for support of a clean water restoration (Total Maximum Daily Load) study.",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2025,1650000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. ","In collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners, continue contributing geomorphic survey and related data, analyses and reports, as well as hydrologic change information from DNR Evaluation of Hydrologic Change (EHC) technical summaries, to aid stressor identification, watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (CWMP) development and implementation under the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program, and other implementation efforts. Fully populate the stream geomorphology survey database that we finished developing in FY24 and complete a public web app to expand access to this information. Continue developing regional curves to help stream practitioners accelerate and validate analyses and design restoration projects.   These information resources will continue to enhance watershed partners’ understanding of biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and help teams identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience (see Nonpoint Restoration and Protection). ",,,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2024,1650000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. "," Stream data and related information: In FY24, DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey and related data, analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners to aid stressor identification, watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, and Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (CWMP) development and implementation under the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program. We anticipate completing and populating the statewide DNR geomorphology survey database built in FY23 to house and organize stream survey data and reports, and starting if not also completing an associated public webmap to expand access to this information. We will continue developing regional curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): We will complete and publish the 25 EHC technical summaries nearly completed in FY23, making the full series (one technical summary for each of 47 major watersheds evaluated) discoverable and searchable in the MN Water Research Library. We plan to publish the statewide EHC meta-analysis completed in FY22 and anticipate completing and posters for at least 20 northwestern Minnesota watersheds begun in FY23 that integrate EHC findings with other information to communicate watershed health conditions, trends, potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers in plain language and graphics. All of the above types of information will continue to enhance watershed partners’ understanding of biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience (see Nonpoint Restoration and Protection). ","Generated information products in the following two categories to help watershed partners understand water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. Stream geomorphology and connectivity data and information: Worked on at least 31 stream geomorphology surveys (some involving multiple sites) in 19 major watersheds, to aid MPCA water quality stressor analysis, WRAPS report updates, regional curve development, and implementation projects. Finished developing a database to house, organize and improve practitioner and public access to stream survey data, summaries and reports. Continued developing sediment rating, bank erosion and other types of regional curves to help practitioners better predict stream channel sediment loads, validate stream analyses, and design restoration projects. Began culvert inventories in four major watersheds, in subwatersheds selected by local partners; the data will be added to the DNR Culvert Inventory Database. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): Finished publishing the 47 EHC watershed technical summaries completed the previous year (see report series in Minnesota Water Research Digital Library). Completed precipitation analyses for 12 major watersheds in northwestern Minnesota to help interpret and communicate EHC findings. Completed posters for at least 20 major watersheds in northwestern Minnesota, integrating EHC findings with other information to communicate watershed health conditions, trends, impacts and management implications to local watershed managers, in plain language and graphics.   ",,,,1530779,264356,,11.4,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2023,1435000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","Stream data and related information: In FY23, DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey and related data, analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners to aid stressor identification, watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (CWMP) development and implementation under the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program, and the development of regional curves. We will continue developing the statewide DNR geomorphology web map piloted in FY20 to house, organize and improve access to the above data and information. We will continue developing regional curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): We will complete and publish DNR EHC technical summaries for all 47 of the watersheds evaluated in FY21. Staff will begin using the summaries to disseminate key findings to MPCA staff working on WRAPS updates, local 1W1P partnerships engaged in developing or implementing CWMPs, and other watershed partners. Watershed posters: Staff will continue developing watershed posters and/or similar tools to help integrate EHC and stream geomorphology study findings with other information, identify key takeaways and communicate watersheds conditions and trends as well as potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers, in plain language and graphics. All of the above types of information will continue to help the MPCA and other watershed partners better understand biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience (see Nonpoint Restoration and Protection). "," Stream data and information: Worked on 32 stream surveys (of which we completed 13) in 20 major watersheds. Worked on 12 geomorphology studies, summaries or reports (of which 6 we completed 6) in 6 major watersheds; 5 are intensive subwatershed stream sediment studies. Completed culvert inventories in several subwatersheds. Continued developing sediment rating and other regional curves to help practitioners better predict stream channel sediment loads, validate stream analyses, and help design restoration projects. Built a database to house, organize and improve practitioner and public access to stream survey data and reports, as part of the effort begun in FY21 to centralize and publicize this information. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): Completed 22 technical summaries and nearly completed the other 25 for 47 major watersheds evaluated in FY21. Published most of the completed summaries in the MN Water Research Library (publishing was temporarily stalled as the library moved to a new platform). Began using the summaries to disseminate key findings to watershed partners including MPCA staff working on WRAPS updates and local 1W1P partnerships developing or implementing watershed management plans. Started developing posters for at least 20 major watersheds in northwestern Minnesota, integrating EHC findings with other information to communicate watershed health conditions, trends, potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers in plain language and graphics. All of the above information products helped enhance watershed partners’ understanding of biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. ",,,,1216245,225000,,9.7,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2022,1440000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. "," In FY22 DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey data analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners to aid stressor identification watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development and Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan development and implementation. We will further develop and populate the statewide DNR geomorphology survey data web map piloted in FY20. In FY22 we will develop a template for DNR evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC) technical summaries. We will start and aim to finish producing summaries for all 47 watersheds for which we previously completed an EHC analysis. We will also complete and summarize a statewide meta-analysis and use the results to give statewide and regional context to the watershed-specific evaluations. In FY22 we will complete a project to pilot the interpretation of DNR EHC data by field staff culminating in a graphically designed poster for at least four watersheds. Staff will use the posters to help communicate EHC results together with data from DNR stream geomorphology studies and other information. The posters will help staff use pictures and plain language to describe key facets of watershed health to local watershed planning groups. In FY22 we will continue developing regional sediment rating curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. All of the above types of information help MPCA and other watershed partners better understand biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. ","Stream data and information: Worked on 29 stream surveys (of which we completed 14) in 22 major watersheds. Worked on 14 geomorphology studies, summaries or reports, summaries or reports (of which we completed 7) in 10 major watersheds. The latter 14 included 4 intensive subwatershed stream sediment studies and a catchment-scale sediment reduction plan based on one of these studies. Made significant progress on developing the statewide geomorphology web map piloted in FY20 to house, organize and improve access to the above types of data and information. Continued developing sediment rating and other regional curves to help practitioners better predict stream channel sediment loads for Minnesota streams, validate stream analyses, and help design stream restoration projects. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): Completed a template for EHC technical summaries and started compiling summaries for each of the 47 watersheds evaluated in FY21. Completed a statewide meta-analysis, the results of which are being incorporated into the watershed technical summaries to provide regional and statewide context. Watershed posters: Completed a pilot project to help staff practice interpreting EHC results for watershed partners, resulting in posters for 4 watersheds and leading staff to start developing posters for 5 other watersheds, of which they completed 2. The posters help staff integrate EHC and stream geomorphology study findings with other information, identify key takeaways, and communicate watersheds conditions, trends, potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers, in plain language and graphics. All of the above data and information products continued to help the MPCA and other watershed partners better understand biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. ",,,,1430388,200647,,11.9,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2021,1475000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY21 DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey data analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners primarily to aid stressor identification and watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development. We will continue to populate the channel assessment web map developed in FY20. In FY21 we will complete a consistent repeatable evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC) for every major watershed that has the necessary streamflow gauge data (besides those piloted in FY20)?about 50 evaluations in all?and analyze the results statewide. In four (4) major watersheds we will pilot approaches to help staff interpret and effectively communicate EHC results to local partners especially those who are developing Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans. In FY21 we will continue developing regional sediment rating curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. ","Contributed stream geomorphology information for MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) WRAPS updates and local watershed planning and implementation: Worked on 38 stream surveys (completing 21 of these) in 16 major watersheds mostly for MPCA stream stressor identification. Worked on 16 stream geomorphology studies (completing three of these) in 11 major watersheds including eight intensive subwatershed stream sediment studies. Completed standardized evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC) analyses for 59 USGS streamflow gages in 41 major watersheds building on those completed in FY20 for a final total of 65 gages evaluated (every gage that had the necessary data) in 47 watersheds. Completed or worked on six EHC watershed summaries. Began a pilot project in four watersheds to help DNR hydrologists and clean water specialists practice interpreting and communicating EHC watershed analysis results to watersheds partners especially those engaged in local watershed planning. Continued developing regional rating curves to predict stream channel sediment loads for Minnesota streams validate stream analyses and help design stream restoration projects. ",,,,1324021,179580,,12.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2020,1478815,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY20 DNR will continue working with state and local partners in watersheds where the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local governments are developing or updating Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS). We will finish developing and start deploying new methods of analysis to streamline and enhance the hydrology and stream geomorphology information we contribute. Specifically we will evaluate hydrologic change for at least two major watersheds continue subwatershed-scale stream stability and sediment supply studies (important for addressing sediment impairments) in at least five major watersheds and communicate the findings to watershed partners. Faster progress is anticipated in future years as staff gain experience with the new methods. We will also continue to develop regional curves to speed up and validate stream analyses and to help design stream restoration projects. ","Contributed stream geomorphology and connectivity information primarily for watersheds where the MPCA and local partners were developing or updating WRAPS: Conducted at least 41 stream surveys in 15 watersheds and started making the data available in a statewide web map and in story maps such as this one. Collected culvert inventory data in three (3) watersheds to be added to a statewide GIS layer. Completed at least 21 and worked on at least 16 more stream geomorphology analyses or reports in 20 watersheds. Seven (7) of these analyses are intensive subwatershed studies that distinguish stream sources from other sources of sediment in impaired streams to help partners identify catchments where upland restoration efforts stream restoration efforts or a combination will be most effective. Collaborated with MPCA and local partners on the above. MPCA and partners use the information to better understand biological and water quality impairments improve pollutant load calculations and help identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. Completed a major project to standardize streamline and enhance DNR hydrology and stream geomorphology contributions: Finished developing a consistent repeatable method of evaluation to quantify the degree of hydrologic change in a watershed and related impacts to flooding channel-forming flows and biological community health. Staff piloted the evaluation in six (6) major watersheds. In five (5) other major watersheds staff applied a new consistent and repeatable process developed in FY19 to identify subwatersheds where an intensive study of stream stability and sediment supply would be most fruitful for discussion with local partners. Continued developing regional rating curves to predict stream channel sediment loads for Minnesota streams validate stream analyses and help design stream restoration projects. ",,,,1291321,202433,,12.8,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2019,1549694,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY19 DNR field staff will continue working with state and local partners in watersheds where Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) are under way. DNR regional staff will continue to provide information and analysis that helps improve watershed assessments and identify effective and lasting restoration and protection strategies. Measurable outcomes will be similar to those for FY18.","• Contributed hydrology stream geomorphology and connectivity information for 47 watersheds where the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners were developing or updating WRAPS. Gathered and analyzed data for 39 of these—including but not limited to stream studies in 25 watersheds; streamflow precipitation climate and/or lake hydrology data for 28 watersheds; and culvert inventory data or analysis in at least 14 watersheds. Five of the stream studies are multi-year subwatershed-scale stream stability and sediment supply studies essential for addressing sediment impairments. MPCA and partners use this information in several parts of the WRAPS process especially stressor identification to better understand biological and water quality impairments improve pollutant load calculations and identify solutions. • Used the above information to recommend enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience in 40 of the 47 watersheds noted above. (See Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection.) Participated in WRAPS meetings in most of the watersheds and reviewed several draft WRAPS reports. • Continued an effort begun in FY18 to streamline and enhance the hydrology and geomorphology information we contribute by developing consistent processes for evaluating hydrologic change at the major watershed scale and identifying subwatersheds where intensive stream stability and sediment supply studies would be worthwhile. • Continued developing regional curves for Minnesota to enable certain stream characteristics to be inferred based on drainage area and ratings for similar streams. Regional curves are used to validate stream analyses and help design stream restoration projects. In FY19 this involved stream surveys ongoing coordination with the US Geological Survey on sediment sampling in streams and new collaborative work to develop data collection standards for regional streambank erosion curves. ",,,,1291321,202433,,12.5,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2018,1567393,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY18 the DNR will continue working with state and local partners in watersheds where the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) process is active. DNR regional staff will continue to provide information and analysis that helps improve watershed assessments and identify effective and lasting restoration and protection strategies. Measurable outcomes of this work will be similar to those stated for FY17.","In FY18 DNR field staff continued to provide information and analysis to state and local agencies to help identify pollution problems and develop lasting solutions. Staff gathered and analyzed data and information for 35 of the state’s 80 major watersheds including but not limited to 133 stream studies and 7 Total Maximum Daily Load studies. DNR staff synthesize and deliver this information to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local government and community partners to help inform key stages of the WRAPS process – from sample site selection to stressor identification to identifying and targeting implementation strategies. For example the MPCA uses some of this information to help identify pollution sources and refine watershed models used to calculate pollutant loads. In the strategy development stage of the WRAPS process DNR staff use information they gathered and analyzed earlier to help partners identify multiple-benefit strategies that address the root causes of pollution problems. In FY18 they helped WRAPS partners identify these types of strategies in 47 watersheds.",,,,1393491,220382,,15.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2017,1638038,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY17 the DNR will continue working with state and local partners to provide information and analysis that helps improve watershed assessments and identify effective and lasting restoration and protection strategies. Numeric measures of this work will be similar to the outcomes stated for FY16. ","In FY17 DNR regional staff continued to provide information and analysis to state and local agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Staff gathered and analyzed data and information for 52 major watersheds. This included but was not limited to 175 stream studies in 33 watersheds and 5 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies. DNR staff synthesize and deliver this information to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local government and community partners to help inform key stages of the WRAPS process – from sample site selection early in the process to stressor identification to identifying and targeting implementation strategies. For example the MPCA uses some of this information to help identify and locate sources of pollution and refine watershed models used to calculate pollutant loads. When a watershed reaches the strategy development stage of the WRAPS process DNR regional staff use information they gathered and analyzed earlier in the process to help partners identify and develop multiple-benefit strategies that address the root causes of pollution problems. In FY17 they helped WRAPS partners identify these types of strategies in 40 watersheds. ",,,,1450406,209455,,16.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2016,1624000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY16 the DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY15. We will continue to participate in multi-agency partnerships to improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally we will participate in multi-agency review of state grants for Clean Water Funded work.","In FY16 DNR field staff continued to provide information and analysis to state and local agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Staff gathered and analyzed data for 55 major watersheds. This included more than 200 studies involving field surveys and analysis of hydrology stream stability and/or culvert inventory data. It also included assistance with 23 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies. The resulting information helps the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) identify and locate sources of pollution and develop and improve watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. The information contributed by the DNR also helps provide a foundation for identifying and targeting restoration and protection strategies and actions. In FY16 DNR field staff helped state and local partners identify and develop restoration and protection strategies in 39 watersheds. Our participation helps teams identify strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide multiple environmental benefits. As in previous years DNR staff participated in the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources’ multi-agency review of Clean Water Fund competitive grant proposals for water quality implementation projects by local governments and community partners. ",,,,1708915,205194,,18.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2015,1591245,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY 15 the DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and clean water restoration and protection strategies. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY14. DNR staff will continue to participate in multi-agency partnerships to improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of state grants for Clean Water Funded work.","In FY15 DNR hydrologists and clean water specialists provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. The DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. This provides a foundation for targeting water quality restoration and protection work. We gathered and analyzed existing data for 57 to provide information that enhances our understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. The data and analysis also provides a foundation for targeting restoration and protection efforts. This work included 161 stream geomorphology and hydrology field surveys. We also assisted with 18 TMDL studies. The DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 45 watersheds. Our participation helps teams identify strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of 100 state Clean Water Fund grant proposals for water quality projects that are administered by the Board of Water and Soil Resources.",,,,1414231,227305,,16.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2014,1750000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY 14 DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY13. DNR staff will continue to participate in multi-agency partnerships to improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of applications for Clean Water Fund implementation grants.","In FY14 DNR staff provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. This provides a foundation for targeting water quality restoration and protection work. Field staff gathered and analyzed information in 34 watersheds and conducted 211 studies of stream geomorphology and hydrology plus a detailed study of proper culvert design for stream stability. This information results in improved models and enhanced understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 37 major watersheds and 30 TMDL studies not associated with a major watershed project. DNR’s participation results in strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of over 180 state Clean Water Fund grant proposals for water quality projects.",,,,1287551,255250,,15.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2013,1630000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY 13 DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. This work includes the following tasks: 1)Gathering analyzing and sharing existing information. DNR has a wealth of information on stream flows water levels climatology fisheries habitats rare species watershed boundaries and more which is used in planning watershed assessments identifying pollution types and sources and developing watershed protection and restoration strategies that provide clean water and other ecological benefits. 2)Conducting technical watershed studies. This is generally field reconnaissance and collecting data about stream features (width depth bank erosion) that helps scientists develop computer models to predict pollution sources and amounts as well as inform findings about the causes of water impairments and the best approaches for watershed restoration. The stream measurements - known as stream geomorphology - are also being used in more detailed studies of sediment movement in watersheds and floodplain mapping and analysis. 3)Developing Major Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. With agency and local partners DNR staff will participate in a process that uses model results data synthesis local input and professional knowledge to recommend protection and restoration options that will be implemented locally for a given major watershed. DNR staff will also participate in multi-agency partnerships to continually improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of state and federal grants for Clean Water work.","In FY13 DNR staff provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. The result is a foundation for targeting of water quality restoration and protection work. Field staff gathered and analyzed information in 30 watersheds and conducted 113 geomorphology studies plus a detailed study of proper culvert design for stream stability. This information results in improved models and enhanced understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 23 major watersheds and 17 TMDL studies not associated with a major watershed project. DNR’s participation results in strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of over 162 state Clean Water Fund grant proposals for water quality projects.",,,,995643,176930,,11.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2012,1630000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY 12 DNR will continue to partner with federal and state agencies as well as local communities to provide technical assistance to development of clean water restoration and protection strategies. This work includes the following tasks: 1) Gathering analyzing and sharing existing information. DNR has a wealth of information on stream flows water levels climatology fisheries habitats rare species watershed boundaries and more which is used in planning watershed assessments identifying pollution types and sources and developing watershed protection and restoration strategies that provide clean water and other ecological benefits. 2) Conducting technical watershed studies. This is generally field reconnaissance and collecting data about stream features (width depth bank erosion) that helps scientists develop computer models to predict pollution sources and amounts as well as inform findings about the causes of water impairments and the best approaches for watershed restoration. The stream measurements - known as stream geomorphology - are also being used in more detailed studies of sediment movement in watersheds. 3) Developing Major Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. With agency and local partners DNR staff will participate in a process that uses model results data synthesis local input and professional knowledge to recommend protection and restoration options that will be implemented locally for a given major watershed. DNR staff will also participate in multi-agency partnerships to continually improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of state and federal grants for Clean Water work. ","In FY12 DNR staff provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. The result is a foundation for targeting of water quality restoration and protection work. Field staff gathered and analyzed information in 18 watersheds and conducted 30 geomorphology studies. This information results in improved models and enhanced understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 30 major watersheds and 36 TMDL studies not associated with a major watershed project. DNR’s participation results in strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of over 200 state Clean Water Fund grants for water quality projects.",,,,846187,337915,,9.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2011,1182500,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY11 DNR will work with state and local partners to provide technical assistance for development of clean water restoration and protection strategies. The number of watershed strategies being developed are decreasing as MPCA has moved to larger scale watershed projects. However the quality and depth of the technical assistance will increase and will result in more detailed and prioritized plans. ","In FY11 DNR provided technical assistance to 52 clean water strategy efforts. This assistance included participation in pollution studies focused on impaired lakes and river reaches as well as larger watershed-scale Major Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. This technical assistance consisted of collaboration with state and local agencies in study and planning sessions designing and conducting field reconnaissance work on fish passage geomorphology stressor identification and Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) to review enhance or guide the design of watershed studies and restoration options. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review and evaluation of 184 grant proposals for 3 grant funding sources (Clean Water Partnership Nonpoint Source Grant and Clean Water Fund) and did technical reviews on 41 other clean water studies or plans.",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2010,689000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY10 DNR will work with state and local partners to provide technical assistance for development or implementation of clean water restoration and protection strategies.","In FY10 DNR provided technical assistance to 63 TMDL (Total Maxiumum Daily Load) or watershed planning efforts. This assistance included: - work on over 20 technical studies by assisting in design and conducting field reconnaissance work on fish passage geomorphology stressor identification and Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) to review enhance or guide the design of TMDL studies and restoration options. - review and evaluation of 50 Clean Water Partnership 122 Nonpoint Source Grant and 318 Clean Water Fund Grant proposals.",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2025,500000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. ","The WHAF website will be reorganized for consistent language, conceptual alignment and improved navigation to the WHAF Suite of Applications. Steps to migrate the WHAF: Explorer application to an updated IT infrastructure will continue with assistance from MNIT staff. Health scores and data layers in WHAF: Explorer will be updated to deliver the latest land cover and impairment data. WHAF research staff will coordinate with MPCA to deliver annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer and Impaired Waters data. WHAF: Lakes will be updated annually to align with data collection and analysis updates by the DNR Lake Ecology Unit. The updated Climate Normals and Departure data calculated by WHAF staff will be delivered in the WHAF: Explorer and the data will be publicly available for download from the Minnesota Geospatial Commons. Additional data layers showing restoration management actions will be added to the WHAF: Explorer. Other data layers will be evaluated for addition when requested by partner agencies and organizations. Additional priority Watershed Health Scores will be updated with best available data and best science approach. The calculation process will be scripted for repeatability. Online documentation for health scores will be updated to align with new scoring analyses. WHAF Major Watershed Reports will be prioritized for revision and new interactive delivery options considered. The WHAF team will publish a chapter in the science book series, ‘Smart Technology for Water Resources’ to document the WHAF approach and share technical details with partners and other audiences. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will continue to build support for the use of the WHAF Suite of Applications. Quarterly newsletter will continue to provide updates on advancements in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework to nearly 7000 subscribers.        ",,,,,,,,,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2024,500000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. ","In FY24, MNIT will hire a new programmer and the WHAF Team will begin updating the WHAF Map application to align with new data storage and delivery protocols. New analysis features and functions will be incorporated into the map application. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to annually deliver an update to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer.  Health scores and data layers derived from the latest National Land Cover Data release will be updated. GIS staff will support DNR efforts to deliver analyzed Climate Projection data and update Groundwater Areas of Concern for water availability. Priority Watershed Health Scores will be updated to new watershed boundaries. Data layers showing implemented management actions will be added and other data layers will be evaluated for addition when requested by partner agencies and organizations. Online documentation for health scores will be updated to align with new scoring analyses. WHAF analyses and reports will be prioritized for revision based on the updated Watershed Boundary data set. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will continue to build support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. Quarterly newsletter will continue to provide updates on advancements in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework. ","In FY24, MNIT hired a new WHAF application developer, and the project staff began updating the WHAF data infrastructure to align with new data storage and delivery protocols. Some health score calculations were updated to incorporate new input data and to automate score generation for moving health scores to new watershed boundary data. Health scores, data layers and the WHAF: Land Cover application was updated to align with the latest National Land Cover Data and Cropland Data releases. WHAF research staff summarized historic climate data to provide an updated 30-year climate ‘normal’ and departures from historic patterns for temperature, annual and seasonal precipitation. WHAF research staff coordinated with MPCA to deliver the annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer and to deliver MPCA 2024 impairment/assessments data. Staff participated in analyses for ground water availability and helped expand reporting of stream restoration projects. The WHAF: Explorer map delivered 180 data layers including 3 new data layers showing implemented management actions, as well as a suite of 41 health scores online and an additional 36 scores available for download. In FY24, WHAF staff enhanced the WHAF: Lakes application improving the way that it shares lake health data, health scores and grades for 3,000 lakes. The new application continued to drive additional online users with annual use of WHAF applications reaching more than 34,000 sessions. WHAF training and support was provided upon request by agency partners, including presentations to Clean Water staff at DNR and MPCA, as well as direct inquiries from individual users. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to more than 6400 subscribers. Online documentation for health scores was updated to align with new scoring analyses and web navigation was improved.   ",,,,253145,43125,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2023,465000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY23 DNR will continue to enhance the WHAF 2.0 Map and will also publish the WHAF for Lakes map application. New data layers will be added to the map when it advances watershed understanding and builds our partnership with other organizations and agencies. Data regarding the implementation of management actions will be evaluated for inclusion in the WHAF. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to annually deliver an update to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. WHAF staff will coordinate with MPCA to explore prioritization methods and delivery options for nutrient reduction strategies. The suite of WHAF Health Scores will be reviewed and prioritized for updating. Priority Health Score updates will be implemented and supporting online documentation will be updated. WHAF analysis and reporting products will be prioritized for revision based on the updated Watershed Boundary data set (anticipated, FY 23). Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. "," In FY23 DNR completed and delivered the WHAF for Lakes application that shares lake health data, health scores, health grades, and a scalable map for 3,000 lakes. The new application brought 2,500 online users in one month and increased annual use of WHAF applications to nearly 20,000 sessions. GIS staff coordinated with MPCA to deliver the annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. Map data layers were added or updated as requested, with a total of 201 layers now available. WHAF staff reviewed final changes to the pending watershed boundary data update. WHAF training and support was provided upon request by agency partners, including presentations to Clean Water staff at DNR, MPCA and BWSR, as well as direct inquiries from individual users. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to 5500 subscribers.   ",,,,292038,46891,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2022,460000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY22 DNR will enhance WHAF 2.0 with additional analytic tools. New data layers will be added to the map when it advances watershed understanding and builds our partnership with other organizations and agencies. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to annually deliver new streams added to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. The project with the Lake Ecology Unit will develop summary charts that deliver key lake conditions within a watershed context. Additional user guidance with applied examples will be delivered. WHAF will begin steps to adjust health scores watershed reports and analysis to reflect the new watershed boundaries scheduled to be published in 2022. Analysis of climate projection data will be coordinated with Minnesota State Climatology office. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. ","In FY22 DNR enhanced the WHAF Map with new data including the Stream Gage network. GIS staff coordinated with MPCA to deliver the annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. User support added 14 new Use Examples and improved Map Help. The WHAF for Lakes project was coordinated with the Lake Ecology Unit to prepare a suite of lakes data and data summaries, including a Lake Health Score. Lake clarity data was acquired from the U of MN and a draft application to deliver the Lakes data was completed. WHAF staff prepared data products for the anticipated watershed boundary data update (boundary data publication delayed until FY23). The WHAF online application had 4500 users access the platform 6500 times. WHAF training and support was provided remotely upon request by DNR and agency partners, including the seventh year of U of MN classroom support and a joint training with MN Dept. of Health on drinking water risks. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to 4900 subscribers. Two WHAF Team positions were filled after long vacancies, impacting accomplishments in FY22. ",,,,311468,24693,,1.36,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2021,425000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY21 DNR will enhance WHAF version 2.0 with additional analytic tools. New data layers will be added to the map when it advances watershed understanding and builds our partnership with other organizations and agencies. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to double the number of streams included in the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. The historic land use analysis will be delivered as interactive land use charts at different watershed scales. Data analysis to summarize and deliver charts of wetland and lake conditions will be developed. Additional user guidance with applied examples will be delivered. WHAF products will sync to the new watershed boundary dataset when that data is published. Analysis of climate projection data will be coordinated with Minnesota State Climatology office. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. ","In FY21 the DNR enhanced WHAF 2.0 with additional analytic tools and data including links to stream and groundwater monitoring networks and 'change over time' for three health scores. GIS staff coordinated with MPCA to double the number of streams in the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. The Land Use application was added to deliver current and historic land use cropping and water use as interactive charts at different watershed scales. The WHAF online application had 5000 users access the platform 7300 times. Additional user guidance and applied use examples were added to the WHAF map and the WHAF website. A project with the Lake Ecology Unit was initiated to deliver summary charts of lake conditions within a watershed context. WHAF training and support was provided remotely upon request by DNR staff and agency partners including University of Minnesota classroom support for the sixth consecutive year. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to 4100 subscribers. ",,,,393883,55386,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2020,421185,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY20 DNR will enhance WHAF version 2.0 with additional tools; advanced location searches map sharing and use guides with applied examples. A tool will be developed to deliver interactive land use charts at different watershed scales. The programming code will be designed as a template for future tools. WHAF products will be prepared to sync with the new watershed boundary dataset when that data is published. Additional data for forest harvest and lake conditions will be added to the WHAF map. Analysis of climate projection data will be coordinated with Minnesota State Climatology office. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. ","In FY20 the DNR enhanced the WHAF Map version 2.0 with improved location searches map sharing and watershed size at all spatial scales. The map delivers more than 180 GIS data layers. WHAF staff added 10 new data layers to the map including forest harvest lake conditions climate departures and drinking water concerns. A Map Tool Reference Guide and Map Process Guide were added to support users. A special IT project to analyze historic land use data was completed. WHAF products are prepared to sync with the new watershed boundary dataset when that data is published. Analysis of climate projection data was postponed pending additional data analysis by the Minnesota State Climatology office. WHAF training and support was provided remotely when request by DNR staff and agency partners. Quarterly newsletters were sent to 3200 subscribers that use the WHAF map and tools. ",,,,380165,44986,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2019,336306,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY19 DNR will complete the transition to version 2.0 of the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) interactive web map. The watershed health scores website and map will be synced to match updated watershed boundaries. The 80 watershed health report cards will be updated and delivered online. Staff will complete four special projects: A project with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to prioritize streams for protection with the results delivered in the WHAF; A decision support tool in the WHAF to help DNR staff and local partners prioritize and target more intensive stream erosion studies; Integrating more groundwater and drinking water data in WHAF in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Health; and collaborating with the State Climatology Office to determine appropriate climate change data to deliver in the WHAF. Staff will continue to support WHAF users via direct email trainings and presentations; and a quarterly newsletter.","In FY19 the DNR transitioned to version 2.0 of the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) interactive web map. Preliminary work to incorporate new watershed boundaries was completed additional work to sync products will occur when the watershed boundary dataset is published by MNIT. Other updates to WHAF website content were completed and included accessibility compliance. WHAF staff worked with interagency partners on several projects. DNR-MPCA Stream Protection Priorities were published and updated in the WHAF Map; a ‘Target’ tool was added to prioritize stream erosion studies; the State Climatology Office and WHAF staff coordinated to publish 81 Climate Summary reports for each major watershed and one statewide report. Each report summarizes the historic climate record for precipitation and temperature (1895-2018). New data was added to the WHAF online map including MPCA 2018 water quality impairments; MDH data related to drinking water; Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area project data; and climate trend data. WHAF staff provided direct user support trainings presentations and a quarterly newsletter reaching 2800 subscribers.",,,,322267,43667,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2018,318607,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY18 Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) staff will update and re-organize the WHAF website for a more intuitive user experience and to meet accessibility requirements. We will update WHAF Watershed Context Reports for all major watersheds and deliver them online. We will recalculate all average WHAF health index scores and update biology health scores. We will continue to coordinate on water quality analyses with the MN Pollution Control Agency and finalize our work on protection strategies for streams. We will develop and test the new WHAF 2.0 map application. We will update user support materials to reflect changes to the WHAF map. We will add modules for the Decision Support System to the WHAF 2.0 map. We will add WHAF use cases and user guidance documents. We will continue to assist Clean Water Fund-supported staff through training and outreach events. The interagency WHAF cohort group formed in FY17 will meet up to three times in FY18. We will continue publishing a quarterly WHAF Newsletter to support our growing subscriber list of public and private partners. ","In FY18 DNR reorganized the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) website to improve the user experience and accessibility. WHAF 2.0 has new tools including one-click watershed delineation updated land cover charts and the ability to quickly see watershed health scores for any location. The 80 major watershed context reports were updated for accessibility and posted online. Six combined health scores were updated and a new score was added for ‘Steep Slopes near Streams.’ Coordination with MPCA allowed delivery of 2018 water quality impairment and assessment data and development of an interagency process to prioritize streams for protection. WHAF staff supported users with five training and outreach events collected feedback and responded to many requests for technical assistance. Staff continued publishing a quarterly newsletter with more than 2 400 public and private sector subscribers.",,,,297495,21112,,2.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2017,301962,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY17 we will continue to update health index scores to incorporate new data. Updates are planned for the Terrestrial Habitat Quality Groundwater Contamination Susceptibility and Species Richness health scores. We will coordinate with DNR Climate Change staff to add new data for climate vulnerability work. We will coordinate with MPCA to share water quality data and model results in the WHAF map. We will enhance the WHAF map to include saving and printing of individual health explorations. We will support agency staff working on WRAPS and 1W1P as requested. The WHAF will provide inputs for standard deliverables as part of a larger DNR effort to support WRAPS development. We will continue to bring additional modules of the Decision Support System online including guides for users as they evaluate watershed health and analyze trade-offs for decision making. We will continue to develop products that build a shared understanding of watershed health concepts including: updating and expanding three to five WHAF web pages with new content; training other DNR staff and key audiences; and publishing a quarterly WHAF newsletter to communicate with a growing user base.","In FY17 WHAF staff updated several health index scores and revised the Groundwater Susceptibility index using new groundwater data. Staff continued on biology health scores and climate change and made the MN Wildlife Action Plan available in online maps. They coordinated with the MN Pollution Control Agency to provide GIS analysis of watershed characteristics for a nutrient study and prioritization of streams for the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies process. They developed and distributed to DNR staff a GIS toolbox for custom land cover charts. Staff created a web platform that allows advanced WHAF users to view the statistical relationship between WHAF health scores and the quality of aquatic communities in Minnesota streams. A new web programmer on the WHAF staff improved map functions compliance with accessibility requirements and guidelines and the overall stability of the application. Upgraded LiDAR-based topography was added to the online map. Staff developed and tested additional modules of the WHAF Decision Support System including beta testing of an online interface. Staff provided support to WHAF users by presenting at 10 training and outreach events and with one-on-one assistance. One training session was attended by 15 Clean Water Fund-supported staff from multiple state agencies. We formed a cohort of Clean Water Fund-supported staff from three agencies to guide WHAF development. We developed a story map explaining watershed concepts. We reorganized and updated content and navigation for our web pages to be implemented in FY18. We continued to publish a quarterly WHAF newsletter to communicate with 1 900 subscribers.",,,,271849,30086,,2.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2016,316000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY16 we will continue to refine and expand the suite of health index scores: update the non-point source and water quality assessments indices; add a metric of phosphorus risk; update the stream species index with current MPCA data; and calculate index trends over time. We will publish watershed health report cards for the 81 major watersheds. We will enhance the online WHAF site and map application with new functions to include: access to major watershed health report cards; health score trends over time; user selected health score comparisons; user map views that can be stored and shared; and watershed ecological context reports. We will work directly with DNR and MPCA staff working on WRAPS and watershed plans as requested and the WHAF will be used to provide inputs for standard deliverables as part of a larger DNR effort to systematically support WRAPS development. We will make the online Decision Support System live including guides that will walk users through an analysis of watershed health and provide a framework for decision making. We continue developing products that build a shared understanding of watershed health including: updating and expanding three to five WHAF web pages with new content; training other DNR staff and key audiences; and publishing a quarterly WHAF newsletter to communicate with a growing user base. ","In FY16 we refined and expanded the suite of health index scores. The work included updates to: Non-Point Source Index and Metric of Phosphorus Risk; Localized Pollution Source Index and six Pollution Metric Scores; Water Quality Assessment Index; Stream Species Quality Index and Metrics for Fish Macroinvertebrates and Mussels; Loss of Hydrologic Storage Index and Loss of Wetland Storage Metric. We provided access to GIS data layers related to each health score. We published watershed health report cards and ecological context reports for Minnesota’s 81 major watersheds. We enhanced the WHAF map so users can store and share map views and create a slideshow of maps. We worked with DNR and MPCA staff on WRAPS protection strategies and 1W1P pilot projects as requested. We participated in development of standard deliverables as part of a DNR effort to support WRAPS development. We enhanced watershed specific information such as land use summaries google earth flyovers and health summaries including expanded guidance to assist users. We completed a beta version of an online Decision Support System available for preliminary use by DNR staff. Three modules of the DSS will move to the WHAF website in FY17 based on hiring a new web programmer. Additional DSS modules will continue in development in FY17 to facilitate input and review by Subject Matter Experts. We continued developing products that build a shared understanding of watershed health including expanded WHAF web content; training other DNR staff and key audiences; and published a quarterly WHAF newsletter for our subscriber list of more than 1400 users.",,,,201865,24165,,2.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2015,258755,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY15 the WHAF team will review all 18 of the WHAF Health index scores add at least two new indices and update four to six indices using new data. Trends in health over time will be generated at the watershed and catchment scale and a web-based delivery mechanism will be designed. A decision support system for applying the Watershed Health Assessment Framework by diverse resource managers will be delivered online. Ongoing direct outreach using the WHAF to support clean water work by the DNR and agency partners will continue. WHAF program staff will coordinate with Information Technology staff to deliver updated watershed health information when new input data becomes available.","In FY15 the WHAF team added five new index scores in the water quality component ad updated five watershed health index scores with new data and improved analysis. We made index updates available to the public through the WHAF online map. The updated index scores are also available as GIS data directly for use by DNR staff and for the public via download from MN Geospatial Commons. We calculated trends over time for land use and crop trends over time (2001 2006 and 2011) and designed a way to show those trends for any watershed the user selects. The trend data is also available for download from the MN Geospatial Commons. We re-designed the WHAF online map to improve the user interface and to add new features including buttons for navigating between watershed scales. We created narrated instructional videos and other guides to help WHAF users tap into the WHAF’s new features. We also started a WHAF newsletter which now has over 1000 subscribers. We designed a preliminary Decision Support System (DSS) which is not yet ready to go online. Some products that support the DSS (including the land use summary charts and enhanced access to additional data and web services) have been developed and are available now. Members of our team took training on Structured Decision Making which provides a framework for designing the DSS. This training slowed our delivery timeline but will make the final product more rigorous and consistent. We directly supported WRAPS work by the DNR and our agency partners and the WHAF was used without direct support in a number of WRAPS – one example is DNR and MPCA staff involved in Stressor ID using the WHAF together to diagnose problems where the fish community indicates poor stream health. We also helped DNR staff use WHAF for One Watershed One Plan pilot planning efforts in the North Fork Crow River Yellow Medicine and Root River watersheds.",,,,226481,1220,,1.8,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2014,100000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY14 new outreach tools will help users apply health index scores and principles to planning and decision making. Explanatory video text and graphics will explain healthy watershed principles at multiple scales. Outreach materials will be available to help users apply health assessments at various scales from statewide to major river basin major watershed and local projects. Health trend data will be developed for several health indices to show changes in the health of Minnesota’s watersheds over time. Staff will participate directly with DNR and PCA staff in applying healthy watershed principles for 3 to 5 projects.","In FY14 the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) online web application was introduced to diverse citizen and agency audiences. This resulted in the WHAF being used for: training of civic leaders involved in watershed issues; internal DNR projects and processes; coordination with MPCA and other agency partners; and reporting watershed health status by a variety of agency and citizen watershed organizations. Resources were added to the WHAF website to ensure ease of use. Instructional videos were posted at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/whaf/explore/index.html to help users apply health assessments at various scales from statewide to major river basin major watershed and local projects. Staff started updating health scores based on the new (2011) National Land Cover Data. Changes in health scores over time are currently in review and developers are working on delivering health trends through the web application. Three additional health indices were downscaled and/or improved in FY 14 including Hydrologic Storage Terrestrial Habitat Quality and Stream Species Quality. Staff worked with MPCA to apply healthy watershed principles to stressor identification reports Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies DNR planning processes (Groundwater Management Areas Parks and Trails Whitewater Watershed Learning Center Park Plan Update Process) and water quality work for the Snake River Pomme de Terre Lower Minnesota River and Pine River watersheds.",,,,81502,1219,,1.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2013,100000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY 13 DNR will deliver Watershed Health Assessment scores and to a smaller watershed (catchment) scale to support the exploration of watershed systems at more local level. Guidance Documents will lead users through a consistent approach for applying Watershed Health Assessment Framework products. A new web interface is in development that will enhance the exploration of complex systems information for resource managers and interested citizens.","In FY 13 half of the watershed health index scores (9 of 18) were calculated statewide to the subwatershed (catchment) scale providing health scores for more than 10 000 individual catchments. A newly designed web interface released at the end of the FY13 allows users to explore health assessment scores and 30 additional GIS data layers at multiple scales. An additional online tool uses MN DNR watershed delineations to instantly identify the upstream area for a selected catchment providing summary information about land use in the upstream area. The WHAF team also completed new health assessment work using data collected by MN DNR Statewide Mussel Survey MPCA Stream Survey IBI Data State Water Use Data and USGS Stream Flow Data.",,,,144058,924,,1.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2012,100000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY12 DNR will deliver a Decision Support Tool to assist managers in applying the watershed health scores to strategic planning and decision making. The GIS Data used for health scores will be readily available to users. Innovative outreach products will bring a systems perspective to a broad audience. Data access will improve the coordination of efforts to improve watershed health. ","In FY12 DNR completed web delivery of Watershed Health Assessment scores and explanatory text. The Watershed Health Assessment Framework was delivered in a series of workshops to assist DNR managers in applying the watershed health scores to strategic planning and decision making. The GIS Data used for health scores is readily available to users. Innovative outreach products are in development that will bring a systems perspective to a broad audience. Data access will improve the coordination of efforts to improve watershed health.",,,,74542,21159,,1.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2011,118000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY 11 DNR will deliver Watershed Health Scores for all 81 major watersheds available through the DNR website including a map interface for scores supporting explanatory text and downloadable products. Products will inform managers and citizens using a systems framework to compare watershed health across Minnesota.","In FY 11 DNR delivered Watershed Health Scores for all 81 major watersheds on the DNR website. A map interface supporting explanatory text and downloadable products are available to managers and citizens. The WAT is being used by resource managers and others to apply an ecological systems approach to understand and address health challenges in our watersheds.",,,,,,,,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2010,110500,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY10 DNR will develop health scores for all 81 major watersheds in Minnesota web-based delivery and interpretation of scores 5 year cycle of score generation for monitoring trends implementation plans based on scoring.","In FY 10 DNR completed health scores for all major watersheds. The scores were prepared for release and a basic web map interface was completed. Project staff also drafted text for the Watershed Assessment Tool website and compiled an extensive literature review and supporting documentation in a database.",,,,,,,,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2025,350000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(g)","$650,000 the first year and $650,000 the second year are for applied research and tools, including maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries, streams, and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data and for assessing the effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY25 MNIT staff at DNR EWR will continue their stewardship role for Minnesota’s authoritative lidar data and watershed data, which will include: Continuing research and development on Minnesota’s new second generation, high-density lidar data. Working with the Minnesota Geospatial Information Office (MnGeo) to develop a hierarchical and seamless statewide data architecture that will provide organized data management of the new lidar and efficient dissemination of products to the public. Creation of new workflows for development of official lidar- derived 3D digital elevation products.  Key products from this work will include digital elevation models (DEM), topographic contours, and high-density Hydrographic Position Index (HPI).  These data products will serve watershed modeling needs such as hydro-terrain and landscape applications, hydraulic and hydrologic design projects, and flood prediction and reduction models. Watershed delineation updates using lidar-derived data. Ongoing collaboration and development of digital dam breachline datasets.  This work consists of management of existing data and creating new breachlines where the data doesn’t exist.   Collaboration with agencies and committees at the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR), DNR, MPCA, U.S. Geological Survey, and the Geospatial Advisory Council.   Continued leadership of 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo), 3DGeo Workgroups, and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. MNIT staff at DNR EWR will also continue to provide subject matter expertise in research and development of foundational digital hydrography data products and applications of the data for government agencies, watershed partners, and public end users.  The focus of this work will be lidar-derived hydrography.  These data are used in water quality and quantity projects to promote watershed health, landscape resiliency, environmental planning and decision making, and hydrologic modeling across Minnesota.   ",,,,,,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2024,350000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(g)","$650,000 the first year and $650,000 the second year are for applied research and tools, including maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries, streams, and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data and for assessing the effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY24 MNIT staff at DNR EWR will continue their data stewardship role for Minnesota’s authoritative lidar and watershed data. The updated watershed delineation dataset completed in FY23 will be published for public use as the DNR Watershed Suite. Staff will also publish a report on the results from the FY23 pilot project that explored the value and efficacy of Clean Water funded digital elevation model (DEM) breachlines in new high-resolution lidar DEMs. Research and development will continue to explore new workflows to create authoritative lidar-derived DEMs, topographic contours, and high-density Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) from new lidar data. DNR MNIT Staff will continue their lidar and watershed collaboration and leadership roles with teams at the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR), DNR EWR, the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) Workgroups, and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. The data stewardship and leadership roles of MNIT staff at DNR EWR provides subject matter expertise in development of foundational data products and application of the data for government agencies, citizens, and other watershed partners. These data are used in water quality and quantity projects to promote watershed health, resilience, and modeling across Minnesota. ","In FY24 MNIT staff at DNR continued their watershed and lidar data stewardship roles. This work included data research and development and stakeholder collaboration.  The staff served as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects with BWSR and DNR EWR. They also served in leadership roles on many teams of the MN Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). This collaborative work ensures watershed and lidar related data meets the needs of federal, state, and local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. MNIT staff at DNR published the updated watershed delineation dataset for public use.  This product known as the DNR Watershed Suite serves as Minnesota’s official watershed map, which serves thousands of watershed projects across the state.  Staff also published a report on the results from the FY23 pilot project that explored the value and efficacy of Clean Water funded Digital Dam Breachline applications in Minnesota’s new high-resolution second generation lidar DEMs.  These results were presented at the annual Esri User Conference in California and the Minnesota GIS/LIS Conference. The 3DGeo Culvert Data Standard Subgroup continued to work and hold quarterly meetings for the establishment of a culvert data standard.  When complete the standard will guide culvert inventories with standardized attributes for systematic data sharing.  DNR MNIT staff continued to provide subject matter expertise in lidar data acquisition and the creation of lidar deliverables such as DEMs, contours, and Hydrographic Position Index (HPI). These authoritative lidar products will serve watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, and One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) programs, hydrologic modeling initiatives, and Clean Water projects.   ",,,,282992,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2023,280000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$535000 the first year and $530000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY23 MNIT staff at DNR will continue the role of stewardship for state lidar data, digital elevation models (DEM), the MnTOPO website, and watershed data. Staff will continue collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR), the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo), and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). The Watershed Delineation dataset will be published for public use following DNR EWR approval of changes that impact authoritative and regulatory applications. The Culvert Data Standard Workgroup will hold a kickoff meeting to launch the team, followed by regular monthly meetings. The Standard will help facilitate Clean Water and hydrologic modeling initiatives. The DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup will continue to develop methodologies and processes related to hydro-modification of high resolution lidar-derived DEMs. The Subgroup will research new techniques and tools for identifying culvert locations and developing new hydrography from DEMs derived from MN’s new high-density lidar. This work will inform MN’s future hydrography development projects as well as the USGS 3D Hydrography program. Staff will collaborate with 3DGeo on implementation of the new statewide Tile Indexing Scheme in support of storage and maintenance of MN’s lidar holdings and dissemination through MNTOPO. The Tile Indexing Scheme will be published to the MN Geospatial Commons. With new lidar data becoming available in FY23 and beyond, MNIT staff will participate in reviewing 3DGeo lidar data deliverables for completeness and identification of concerns. They will serve as subject matter experts in the creation of lidar deliverables such as DEMs, contours, and HPI. The review of these data support research and development of new workflows for integration into software platforms and Clean Water programs. Solutions are being identified, documented, and shared with partners to better assist them with working with these high-density datasets. "," In FY23 MNIT staff at DNR continued their data stewardship roles. This work includes data development and collaboration. The staff served as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects with BWSR and DNR EWR. They also served in leadership roles on many teams of the MN Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). This collaborative work ensures watershed and lidar related data meets the needs of federal, state, and local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. MNIT staff at DNR held several meetings with DNR EWR and other state and federal agency staff to review watershed outlet locations and naming conventions resulting in agency approved authoritative watershed boundaries. The 3DGeo Culvert Data Standard Subgroup held a kickoff meeting to launch this new team and followed that by hosting quarterly meetings. The work on the Culvert Standard is ongoing, when complete it will help facilitate Clean Water and hydrologic modeling initiatives. With guidance and expertise provided by the DNR MNIT staff, the DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup completed the pilot project that reviewed the role of existing data developed with Clean Water Funds for use with new high resolution lidar-derived DEMs. Results were compiled and a report is in development. This work will inform Minnesota’s future hydrography development projects and the USGS 3D Hydrography Program.  DNR MNIT staff continued to provide subject matter expertise in lidar data acquisition and the creation of lidar deliverables such as DEMs, contours, and Hydrographic Position Index (HPI). The 3DGeo Tile Indexing Scheme was implemented into the lidar data and published to the MN Geospatial Commons for public use. These authoritative lidar products will serve watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, and One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) programs. ",,,,294302,7388,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2022,285000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$535000 the first year and $530000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY22 MNIT staff at DNR will continue their role of stewardship for state lidar data the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff will continue collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. The Watershed Delineation dataset will be published for public use. The initial Culvert Data Standard Workgroup will hold their first meetings. Comprised of interested parties who have current culvert datasets this knowledge base will inform development of the Culvert Data Standard. Metadata and supporting documentation for the DNR Travel Time tool will be completed and the tool will be made available to the public. The DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup will continue to develop methodology and processes related to hydro-modification of high resolution lidar-derived digital elevation models. This research and its practical applications will be documented to inform watershed delineation processes into the future. ","In FY22 MNIT staff at DNR continued collaborating with BWSR as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects, served on the MN Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo), and served lead roles on the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). This collaborative work ensures consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Progress was made on the Watershed Boundary Dataset but was not published as planned. MNIT Staff worked with DNR EWR to incorporate and approve updates that impact authoritative and regulatory applications of the dataset. Research and development explored applying new workflows to create high-density Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) from new lidar data. Work continues on establishing the State Culvert Standard and exploring the ability of new lidar to identify culverts. This initiative was strengthened by MNIT staff establishing a Workgroup comprised of members from counties, SWCDs, and state agencies. MNIT staff led the 3DGeo DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup in collection of existing breachline datasets for use in MN’s new high-resolution lidar-derived digital elevation models (DEM).  This assessment determined the effort required to digitize new breachlines or modify existing breachline geometry for proper hydrologic connectivity. Staff also worked with DNR MNIT and BWSR to complete the DNR Travel Time Tool update and published on the MN Geospatial Commons data portal. Staff collaborated with 3DGeo partners to create a new statewide tile indexing scheme for storing, managing, and disseminating lidar data and other geospatial products. Research and development work started on working with new lidar point clouds and high resolution DEM’s. Efficiencies and best practices are being documented and shared with partners to better assist them with working with these high-resolution datasets. ",,,,278558,27041,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2021,285000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY21 MNIT staff at DNR will continue their role of stewardship for state lidar data the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff will continue their cross-agency collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. Additionally staff will be working with DNR on the public release of the updated statewide watershed dataset the first major update release since 2011. A new update to the statewide Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) will also be completed for application in water resource tools and visualization assessments of the landscape. Work will begin on writing Minnesota's geospatial culvert data standard to establish a single commonly accepted set of attribute specifications for transferring and aggregating culvert data in Minnesota for a wide variety of water resource applications. Staff will work with BWSR DNR and 3DGeo on the quality control and assessment of digital dam breachline deliverables provided to the state as part of the Tillage and Erosion Survey Program and the updating of DNR's Digital Elevation Model Travel Time Tool. ","In FY21 MNIT staff at DNR continued collaborating with BWSR as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects served on the Minnesota Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and served lead roles on the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. This collaborative work ensures consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Staff harmonized the federal Watershed Boundary Dataset with DNR Catchment Dataset using the U.S. Geological Survey toolset. Updating existing Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) expanded into research using new lidar data for an updated HPI. Establishing the foundation for a state culvert standard continues current work focused on the ability of new lidar to identify culverts. The quality control of digital dam breachlines started with staff reviewing deliverables for completeness and integration into a digital elevation model that will serve the BWSR Tillage and Erosion Survey Program. Staff also worked with DNR MNIT and BWSR technicians to complete the DNR Travel Time Tool update.",,,,265810,19419,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2020,280000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY20 MNIT staff at DNR will continue stewardship of state lidar data on the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff will continue their cross-agency collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources two committees of the Geospatial Advisory Council (Standards and 3D Geomatics Committees) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team working towards publication of state watershed culvert and lidar data standards. These standards ensure consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Staff will complete three special projects: release an update to Minnesota’s authoritative watershed datasets; write technical papers to convey new findings and protocols bringing greater consistency to LiDAR digital elevation models and hydrography data products; participate in the 3D Geomatics Committee led effort to write a Lidar Acquisition Plan that strives to bring new high-density lidar to Minnesota. New lidar will enhance Minnesota's existing digital elevation and watershed data for hydro-terrain analysis tools."," In FY20 MNIT staff at DNR continued stewardship of state lidar data on the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff continued their cross-agency collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects served on the Minnesota Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and served lead roles on the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. This collaborative work ensures consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Staff completed the most recent update to Minnesota’s authoritative watershed dataset. 3DGeo Committee contributions include writing a LCCMR proposal for lidar acquisition and DEM hydro-modification completion of writing the Minnesota Lidar Plan and establishment of Minnesota’s first high definition lidar data collection under the state’s Lidar Plan scheduled for spring 2021. This new lidar data will update Minnesota’s existing digital elevation and watershed data. ",,,,261613,21052,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2019,260000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY19 Minnesota Information Technology (MNIT) staff at the DNR will continue stewardship of state LiDAR (light detection and ranging) on the MnTOPO website and related watershed delineation data. Staff will continue to collaborate with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) and two committees of the Governor’s Geospatial Advisory Council (Standards Committee and 3D Geomatics Committee) toward publication of a state standard to ensure consistent processing of LiDAR digital elevation data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting the implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. The Standards Committee will formally review and publish the standard. Staff will draft technical papers to convey new findings and protocols bringing greater consistency to LiDAR digital elevation models watercourse and watershed hydrography data products. The 3D Geomatics Committee will help disseminate this information to other Minnesota LiDAR and spatial data users. Also in FY19 staff will complete a major watershed delineation update and revision and provide related education and outreach to users.","In FY19 MNIT staff at DNR continued: stewardship of state lidar data on the MnTOPO website and related watershed delineation data; collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources Minnesota’s Geospatial Advisory Council (Standards Committee and 3D Geomatics Committee) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team; documented protocol for the Watershed Update Project; and assembled digital dam breachline data from state funded projects. This work ensures consistent development and processing of digital elevation models and hydrography data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting the implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. The Watershed Delineation Update project was not completed in FY19 as planned because the project scope expanded; it will be finalized in FY20.",,,,266557,30920,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2018,248238,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY18 Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) staff at the DNR will continue stewardship of Minnesota’s LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and watershed data holdings including making LiDAR data available on the MnTOPO website. Staff plan to publish technical papers finalized in FY17 about standards for hydro-modified digital elevation models (DEMs). Hydro-modified DEMs are needed to run models that help local governments prioritize and target watershed management projects. These efforts will help the DNR and the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) accelerate LiDAR-based data development for local governments engaged in conservation planning and project implementation through the One Watershed One Plan program.","In FY18 Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) staff at the DNR continued stewardship of state LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data accessible on the MnTOPO website and related watershed delineation data. Staff continued collaborating with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) on a state standard for processing LiDAR digital elevation data needed by local governments engaged in watershed planning (One Watershed One Plan) for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects. Staff added key technological advancements and stakeholder feedback to the draft standard but did not publish it in FY18 as planned. ",,,,239009,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2017,223000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY17 Minnesota Information Technology (MNIT) staff at the DNR will continue stewardship of Minnesota’s LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and watershed data holdings. Research and development will continue as staff work toward publishing the digital elevation model (DEM) hydro-modification guidance developed in FY16. This information will continue to support data development for local governments engaged in the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program. Work will continue to focus on conservation planning and targeting tools that require LiDAR-derived DEMs. Technical papers will convey new findings and protocols to bring greater consistency to Minnesota’s authoritative DEM watercourse and watershed hydrography data products. In FY17 the DNR river ecologist will: (1) Continue statistical validation and improvements in the coding and usability of the geographic information system (GIS) tools created for stream type and valley type classification; and (2) Begin developing a GIS layer showing completed of stream and valley type classification. The layer will be limited to places where GIS and field classifications have been compared. The goal will be to expand this layer statewide in the future.","In FY17 Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) staff at the DNR continued stewardship of Minnesota’s watershed boundary and LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data holdings. Staff continued to manage LiDAR data and make it accessible on the MnTOPO website. Staff also collaborated with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) toward systematic statewide hydro-modification of LiDAR digital elevation models (DEMs). Hydro-modified DEMs are needed to run models that help local governments prioritize and target watershed management projects. Staff finalized technical papers about standards for hydro-modified DEMs. All of these efforts support planning and project implementation by local governments engaged in the One Watershed One Plan program.",,,,388596,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2016,223000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY16 the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue to coordinate the storage accessibility maintenance and use of LiDAR data and watershed data. Work will result in efficiencies in data use tools and training. A major work product will be example hydro-modified digital elevation models and guidance for developing such models so that work with watershed models at the local level will be done consistently and improvements to the state’s LiDAR-based digital elevation model can be shared and used statewide. The DNR River Ecologist will continue comparing GIS to field classifications of stream types and valley types. When the work is done it will be written up in a technical paper. Once the methods have been accepted as statistically valid staff will work on using the new method to create a GIS layer of stream classifications. The initial GIS layer for stream and valley classifications will likely be limited by location of stream comparison reaches (field and GIS) with plans to expand this layer statewide in the future. ","In FY16 Minnesota Information Technology (MNIT) staff at the DNR continued stewardship of Minnesota’s watershed boundary and LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data holdings. Ongoing LiDAR data management and coordination continued in support of data accessibility for Minnesota. Staff collaborated with the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) toward systematic statewide hydro-modification of LiDAR digital elevation models (DEMs). Hydro-modified DEMs are needed to run models that help local governments prioritize and target watershed management projects. Four technical papers were written and five projects were developed in support of this work including a study to compare the results of different degrees degree of hydro-modification. All of this information will help BWSR support data development for local governments engaged in the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program. Other key work included continued collaboration with the US Geological Survey along Minnesota’s northern boundary to harmonize US and Canadian watershed datasets. This partnership has led to better information for watershed modeling and targeting of locations for best management practices. In FY16 the DNR river ecologist rebuilt a previously developed geographic information system (GIS) tool to help staff classify stream valley types. The new version enables staff to incorporate regionally specific data which will make the tool work better across Minnesota’s many varying landscapes. Improvements were also made in the processing speed and ease of use of the tool. Staff also began work to ensure the tool is statistically valid and began writing a technical paper about the tool.",,,,231928,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2015,190000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY15 the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue to manage the effort of coordinating LiDAR data and watershed data as the LiDAR data steward and watershed data steward respectively. Through this work efficiencies in data utilization tool development and training will facilitate water resource management and Clean Water initiatives across Minnesota. Advancements in MnTOPO including map service updates alternative hill shades for topographic viewing and advanced LiDAR-derived products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape will be coordinated and implemented by the GIS Hydrologist. The DNR River Ecologist will determine final stream type and valley type classifications derived from desktop tools as well as compare field surveyed data to these final classifications. Statistical analysis will be used to determine if there is a significant difference between classifications using both methods.","In FY15 the MNiT@DNR Geographic Information System (GIS) Hydrologist continued to serve as Minnesota’s watershed and LiDAR data steward; we collaborated with USGS to harmonize watershed delineations with Canadian data and the federally managed watershed boundary dataset (WBD). Because of this partnership Minnesota has better information for watershed modeling and targeting locations for best management practices. We continued to coordinate storage and availability of LiDAR data for Minnesota. We finished a new product called hydrographic position index; it is now publicly available for use in GIS. We also crafted a plan to support the Board of Water and Soil Resources with terrain analysis data and the use of the new PTMApp planning tool both of which are being used in One Watershed One Plan pilot programs. The DNR River Ecologist researched GIS techniques to classify stream and valley types. Using Minnesota’s LiDAR data set and other data custom programming tools were developed to automate GIS procedures. Classifications made with the automated system were compared to field-based stream classifications at select locations. The next step in the process is a statistical analysis to see if the GIS method gives similar results to the field-based method.",,,,170155,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2014,190000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY14 the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue to manage the effort of coordinated LiDAR data and tool development training and its applications for water resource management and Clean Water initiatives. As the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue developing naming and use standards for LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) data products. For example DNR will establish standards for “hydrologic conditioning” (removal of digital dams) for new high resolution digital elevation models. DNR will also conduct training workshops and webinars related to hydrology and the use of LiDAR information. The DNR GIS Hydrologist will produce and make available advanced spatial analysis tools and products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape. These tools will greatly enhance the ability of local watershed managers to “see” landscape features like steep slopes or drainage pathways allowing much better targeting of conservation practices.","In FY14 the DNR GIS Hydrologist continued to serve as Minnesota’s Watershed Data Steward; the DNR collaborated with USGS to harmonize watershed delineations with Canadian data and the federally managed watershed boundary dataset (WBD). Because of this partnership Minnesota has better spatial information for watershed management activities such as locating water quality practices and watershed modeling. As the MN LiDAR data steward and the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair the DNR GIS Hydrologist continued the work of LiDAR coordination for Minnesota. As part of this responsibility the DNR GIS Hydrologist functioned as the lead coordinator in the published release of the internet portal for viewing and downloading LiDAR data known as MnTOPO. Additionally several outreach and education training sessions were conducted to promote MnTOPO and proper LiDAR data usage. The GIS Hydrologist facilitated the development of the LiDAR naming standards for Minnesota which resulted in the recently completed overhaul of the entire LiDAR dataset. This work also advanced the writing of LiDAR standards by developing new LiDAR terminology for use in Minnesota. The DNR GIS Hydrologist defined a suite of terminology that will guide the development and management of digital elevation models intended for hydrologic and water resource applications. Advanced LiDAR derived products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape were not created because additional staff were not available to complete this work. The DNR River Ecologist began developing a procedure for classifying stream types and valley types in Minnesota using LiDAR data. An outline of the proposed process for GIS classification was developed which details the necessary metrics and protocols. Survey data from the Clean Water Legacy Specialists from each DNR region were gathered for future validation analysis.",,,,149268,,,1.7,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2013,235000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY13 DNR will continue the ongoing work of conducting watershed delineations by request and begin to coordinate the use of LiDAR data for development of the next generation of watershed delineations for Minnesota. The DNR GIS Hydrologist will manage the effort of coordinated LiDAR data development training and its applications for water resource management and Clean Water initiatives as the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair. This LiDAR work will include three LiDAR Hydrology training workshops for outstate-Minnesota over the next year. The DNR will produce advanced LiDAR derived products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape that will facilitate CW initiatives dependent on understanding the hydrology of the landscape. Finally DNR will continue its work with the USGS and Natural Resources Conservation Service and International Joint Commission to harmonize watershed delineations along the Canadian border as watersheds get refined to smaller scales for precision conservation and water resource management.","In FY13 the DNR GIS Hydrologist continued to serve as Minnesota’s Watershed Data Steward; the DNR partnered with USGS NRCS and the International Joint Commission to harmonize watershed delineations with Canadian data more accurately reflecting drainage areas coming from Canada. The result is better spatial information for watershed management activities such as locating water quality practices and watershed modeling. As the Minnesota LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair the DNR GIS Hydrologist coordinated LiDAR data development training and its applications for water resource management across Minnesota. This collaborative work was administered through 12 monthly internet meetings by a team of GIS and LiDAR experts from across the state. Additionally these responsibilities resulted in three LiDAR Hydrology training workshops for outstate-Minnesota and one at the Minnesota GIS/LIS Conference.",,,,99492,24437,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2012,235000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY12 DNR will continue to conduct watershed delineations by request. DNR will broaden the number of people using watershed data and tools for clean water related initiatives. DNR's watershed delineator will continue to update the DNR Catchment data with the last 2 years of tracked changes and coordinate the use of LiDAR data and LiDAR training as the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair. Finally DNR will work with the USGS and Natural Resources Conservation Service and International Joint Commission to harmonize watershed delineation along the Canadian border.","In FY12 DNR GIS Hydrologist Watershed Data Steward completed the delineations of 30 special request watersheds for CW work and hosted the 2012 International Joint Commission’s Transboundary Hydrographic Data Harmonization meeting during February to harmonize watershed delineations along the Canadian border. The DNR GIS Hydrologist promoted the use of LiDAR data and application of the technology for Minnesota as the Chair of the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee. This work included the continuation of LiDAR training for water resource managers in seven workshops across the state.",,,,72703,43561,,0.8,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2011,190000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY11 DNR will work with United States Geological Survey (USGS) to update the watershed boundary datasets with DNR Catchment geometry. Staff will integrate LiDAR data and conduct LiDAR training to facilitate LiDAR data utilization in water-related applications. DNR will also assist the USGS in the completion of the WBD watershed dataset and continue to advance the use of DNR Catchments as core data for the State's clean water initiatives.","In FY11 DNR watershed hydrologists completed work with USGS for Watershed updates and used LiDAR-derived digital elevation models for a detailed delineation of 158 shallow lake watersheds. As the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair DNR's watershed delineator developed and taught LiDAR training courses and coordinated the implementation of LiDAR for use in the DNR and the State.",,,,,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2010,180000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY10 DNR will initiate watershed delineations for shallow lakes and 2 500 basins between 50-100 acres and update 10 watershed delineations with LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and/or completed Drainage Modernization data. ","In FY10 DNR's watershed delineator mapped drainage areas of 257 shallow lakes in four Major Watersheds and used LiDAR data to complete watershed delineations for two major watersheds. This work was temporarily suspended until technology evolved to more efficiently analyze LiDAR derived products.",,,,,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
34071,"Web Design and Development Support",2016,296250,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","These comes primarily from the project collaborations stemming from other project/partnership proposals. whose outcomes would inform this question, with Web support being a contributing factor to those outcomes.",,,,,296250,41061,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",3.70,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","MNHS continues to focus on broadening access to many of its Legacy-funded programs through the Internet. This funding supports the web development professionals who plan, build, and implement digital components that are part of many Legacy-funded history projects and helps pay for Web hosting to make these projects accessible to people in Minnesota and beyond. MNHS also uses the web to report on its use of Legacy funds at legacy.mnhs.org and for the public to apply for Legacy grant funds at legacy.mnhs.org/grants.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Capital Development/Rehabilitation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Fund Administration, Grants/Contracts, Preservation, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/web-design-and-development-support,,,,
34099,"What's Up Doc? The Animation Art of chuck Jones traveling exhibit",2016,210351,"Session Law Reference: Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, chapter 2, article 4, section 2, subdivision 4 (b) (2) Programs","$5,525,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for programs and purposes related to the historical and cultural heritage of the state of Minnesota conducted by the Minnesota Historical Society.","Outcome goals: MHC attendance greater than 200,000 in FY16, and greater than 85,000 during the run of What's Up Doc? in FY16-17. Net Promoter Score goal +50 or higher. Increased interest in and appreciation for history. Increased awareness and appreciation of MNHS and its programs.",,,,,210351,13300,"Officers Phyllis Rawls Goff, President D. Stephen Elliott, Secretary William R. Stoeri, Immediate Past President William D. Green, Vice President Kirby M. Law, Treasurer Executive Council Eric Ahlness Kurt BlueDog Grant Davis Phyllis Rawls Goff Martha Kaemmer Kirby M. Law Dean M. Nelson William R. Stoeri Ben Vander Kooi Kathleen Blatz Barbara Burwell D. Stephen Elliott William D. Green Dennis L. Lamkin Monica Little Peter Reis Bo Thao-Urabe Eleanor Winston Suzanne Blue Brenda J. Child Michael Farnell David R. Hakensen Jean M. Larson Charles Mahar Peter Reyes, Jr. Karen Wilson Thissen Warren Zaccaro Ex-Officio Mark Dayton, Governor Steve Simon, Secretary of State Rebecca Otto, State Auditor Tina Smith, Lieutenant Governor Lori Swanson, Attorney General",1.20,"Minnesota Historical Society","Non-Profit Business/Entity","What's Up, Doc? The Animation Art of Chuck Jones is a new traveling exhibit from the Smithsonian Institution that reveals the creative genius behind some of the most enduringly popular cartoons and animated films of all time. Chuck Jones brought to animation an unparalleled talent for comic invention and a flair for creating animated characters with distinctive and often wildly eccentric personalities. Jones perfected the quintessentially suave and wisecracking Bugs Bunny, the perpetually exasperated Daffy Duck, the hapless but optimistic Elmer Fudd, and created the incurably romantic Pep_ Le Pew and the eternal antagonists Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner. What's Up, Doc?, opening April 30, 2016, examines Jones' development as a filmmaker and visual artist and showcases many of his most significant films, which come to life through original sketches, animation cels, scripts, and on-screens. The exhibit is a partnership between the Smithsonian Institution, The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, the Chuck Jones Center for Creativity, and the Museum of the Moving Image. Communication to the public about this exhibit will make use of the popular animated characters in print, broadcast, social media, and media relations strategies.",,,2015-07-01,2016-06-30,"Arts & Cultural Heritage Fund","In Progress",,,MNHS,Legacy,"Minnesota Historical Society","345 Kellogg Blvd. W","Saint Paul",MN,55102,651-259-3105,,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Historical Society",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/whats-doc-animation-art-chuck-jones-traveling-exhibit,,,,