"ID","Title","Fiscal Year(s)","Fiscal Year Funding Amount","Legal Citation / Subdivision","Appropriation Language","Proposed Measurable Outcome(s)","Measurable Outcome(s)","Proposed Outcomes Achieved","Other Funds Leveraged","Source of Additional Funds","Direct Expenses","Administration Costs","Recipient Board Members","Number of full time equivalents funded","Recipient","Recipient Type","Body","About the Issue","Project Details","Start Date","End Date","Source","Status","Updates","Details/Reports","First Name","Last Name","Organization Name","Street Address","City","State","Zip Code","Phone","Email","Activity Type","Administered by","Media","Counties Affected","LSOHC Section","Watershed","URL","Advisory Group Members and Qualifications","Board Members and Qualifications","Conflict of Interest Contact","Conflict of Interest Disclosed"
34206,"JD 15 BMP Inventory - Implementation (MDM Grant)",2016,139700,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Multipurpose Drainage Management 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project is estimated to reduce sediment by 99 tons per yer and phosphorus by 113 pounds per year. Phosphorus = 113 lbs P/yr ","This grant is a follow up to an assessment of JD15 where 36 erosion sites along the ditch were identified, ranked (Minor, Moderate, Severe), and prioritized for repair. This MDM grant paid for installation of 16 water and sediment control basins, six (6) grade stabilization structures, and one (1) waterway.","achieved proposed outcomes",39925,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",139700,2,,2.31,"Wright SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Wright SWCD applied for, and received, a Soil Erosion and Drainage Law Compliance grant in 2015. This grant was used to inventory Joint Ditch 15 (JD 15) for areas that could benefit from the installation of Side Inlet Control Structures (SICS) and vegetated buffer strips (buffers). JD 15 is known to have areas of significant erosion that effect both benefited landowners as well as a number of impaired waters downstream. The impaired downstream waters include Sucker Creek, Cokato Lake, and the North Fork Crow River. The JD 15 Inventory was completed during the summer of 2015. The goal of this project is to implement best management practices (BMP's) that will address the issues identified in the JD 15 Inventory. Given the JD 15 Inventory prioritized resource concerns along JD 15, the current project will focus on addressing the most significant areas of erosion and coordinating with the Wright County Drainage Authority to address lower priority areas. With the recent buffer legislation a lower priority will be given to buffer establishment along JD 15, however, the results of the JD 15 inventory will still be presented to landowners to promote the voluntary adoption of buffers. The implementation of BMP's along JD 15 and within its watershed will reduce the amount of sediment and nutrients transported downstream as well as reduce the rate at which water enters JD 15. ",,,2016-02-24,2020-10-07,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Andrew,Grean,"Wright SWCD","311 Brighton Ave S Ste C",Buffalo,MN,55313,763-682-1970,andrew.grean@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Wright,,"North Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/jd-15-bmp-inventory-implementation-mdm-grant,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
33614,"2015 - CCMI Directed CWF - Conservation Corps - CCMI (SAGENCY)",2016,500000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","(r) The board shall contract for delivery of services with Conservation Corps Minnesota for restoration, maintenance, and other activities under this section for up to $500,000 the first year and up to $500,000 the second year.",,,,240400,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",500000,,"Members for Conservation Corps MN & IA are: ",,"Conservation Corps MN & IA","Local/Regional Government",,,,2014-02-01,2017-02-01,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,Tim,Johnson-Grass,"Conservation Corps MN & IA","2715 Upper Afton Rd Ste 100","Saint Paul",MN,55119,651-209-9900,tim.johnson-grass@conservationcorps.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2015-ccmi-directed-cwf-conservation-corps-ccmi-sagency,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","Nicole Clapp ",
10008287,"2016 Zumbro River Load Monitoring Network",2016,57975,,,,,,,,,,,.19,"Zumbro Watershed Partnership","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Zumbro River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) project will continue existing efforts to calculate seasonal pollutant loads for the Root River. The Zumbro Watershed Partnership (ZWP) along with Olmsted County Environmental Services will assist the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with water quality monitoring and pollutant load calculations of four sub-watershed sites. Approximately 50 grab samples per site (total of 200) between ice-out and October 31 of 2016 and 2017 will be collected along with field measurements and observations. Sites include: North Fork Zumbro River (near Mazeppa, MN), North Branch Middle Fork Zumbro River (near Oronoco, MN), South Branch Middle Fork River (near Oronoco, MN) and South Fork Zumbro River (near Rochester, MN). Seasonal load calculations for each site will be calculated using the FLUX32 model. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Lawrence,Svien,"Zumbro Watershed Partnership","1485 Industrial Drive NW",Rochester,MN,55041,"(651) 226-6787",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Olmsted, Wabasha",,"Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-zumbro-river-load-monitoring-network,,,,
10024700,"2016 Two Rivers Lake Targeted Water Quality BMP Installation",2016,187983,"Projects and Practices 2016 - The Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(b) ","Projects and Practices 2016 - $10,187,000 the first year and $10,188,000 the second year are for grants to protect and restore surface water and drinking water; to keep water on the land; to protect, enhance, and restore water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams; and to protect groundwater and drinking water, including feedlot water quality and subsurface sewage treatment system projects and stream bank, stream channel, shoreline restoration, and ravine stabilization projects. The projects must use practices demonstrated to be effective, be of long-lasting public benefit, include a match, and be consistent with total maximum daily load (TMDL) implementation plans, watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS), or local water management plans or their equivalents. A portion of these funds may be used to seek administrative efficiencies through shared resources by multiple local governmental units.","The estimated reductions associated with these proposed BMPs is 107 pounds phosphorous/yr. and 49 tons of sediment/yr. Public benefits of Two Rivers Lake include fishing and recreation.","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 54.64 pounds of Phosphorus, 64.11 tons of Sediment, and 64.2 tons of Soil Loss. ","Achieved most proposed outcomes",80248,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",187983,696,"Members for Stormy SWCD are: Arlyn Lawrenz, Chuck Uphoff, Kenneth Schefers, Matt Bruyette, Tom Gregory",0.33,"Stearns SWCD","Local/Regional Government","This project will work to address the nutrient impairment of Two Rivers Lake through the installation of targeted best management practices as prioritized in the Two Rivers Lake Targeted Conservation Practice Plan (funded through a 2014 SEDLCP CWF Grant). The goal of this project is to implement erosion control practices within three agricultural priority subwatersheds with existing erosion concerns and also to install urban water quality practices in two of the identified sub watersheds within the City of Albany. Preliminary cost estimates and pollutant reduction estimates have been calculated for the proposed projects using data from past Stearns SWCD projects and work completed by RESPEC for the Two Rivers Lake Targeted Conservation Practice Plan (2015). The funds requested with this application will go towards implementation of projects to reduce the nutrient and sediment loading from those properties within those prioritized areas. The three agricultural sites will be focused on erosion control and nutrient reduction practices. BMP?s implemented will range from structural practices (water and sediment basins, grassed waterways, etc.) to management practices (cover crops, residue management, land use changes). Targeted areas in the City of Albany include a potential wetland restoration and multiple urban BMP?s (raingardens, iron enhanced sand filters, infiltration swales, etc.). The estimated reductions associated with proposed urban and agricultural BMPs is 107 pounds phosphorous/yr. and 49 tons of sediment/yr. Outreach to others in the priority subwatersheds will be continued for future efforts and additional BMP opportunities as we work toward positive improvements in the Two Rivers Lake watershed. We?ve set a goal of addressing 20 of the agricultural erosion site owners and 8 projects within the city of Albany identified in the Two Rivers Lake Targeted Conservation Practice Plan over the next 10 year (50% of projects identified in the priority areas).",,,2016-08-03,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ben,Ruley,"Stearns SWCD","110 2nd Street South Suite 128","Waite Park",MN,56387,320-251-7800,ben.ruley@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Stearns,,"Mississippi River - Sartell",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-two-rivers-lake-targeted-water-quality-bmp-installation,http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board,http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board,"Annie Felix-Gerth",2
10024701,"2016 - Targeted Watershed (Pelican River WD )",2016,1500000,"Targeted Watershed 2016 - The Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(c) ","Targeted Watershed 2016 - $6,000,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for targeted local resource protection and enhancement grants and statewide program enhancements for technical assistance, citizen and community outreach, and training and certification, as well as projects, practices, and programs that supplement or otherwise exceed current state standards for protection, enhancement, and restoration of water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams or that protect groundwater from degradation, including compliance.","This project is estimated to expand the Rice Lake wetland complex by creating approximately 462 acres of wetland. As a result, the largest phosphorus loading contribution to the watershed will be reduced by approximately 50% (1,500 ? 2,000 pounds Phosphorus/annually) and will stem the deterioration of water quality in Detroit Lake.","Due to various delays, this project was unable to be completed. ","Did not achieve proposed outcomes",304944,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",200362,22000,"Members for Pelican River WD are: Chris Jasken, Dennis Kral, Ginny Imholte, Janice Haggart, Lowell Deede, Orrin Okeson, Rick Michaelson",1.05,"Pelican River WD","Local/Regional Government",,,,2016-06-17,2020-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tera,Guetter,"Pelican River WD","211 Holmes St. W, Ste 201 ","Detroit Lakes",MN,56501,218-846-0436,tera.guetter@arvig.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Becker,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-targeted-watershed-pelican-river-wd,http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board,http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board,"Annie Felix-Gerth",2
10024702,"2016 - Targeted Watershed (Polk , East SWCD)",2016,790240,"Targeted Watershed 2016 - The Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(c) ","Targeted Watershed 2016 - $6,000,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for targeted local resource protection and enhancement grants and statewide program enhancements for technical assistance, citizen and community outreach, and training and certification, as well as projects, practices, and programs that supplement or otherwise exceed current state standards for protection, enhancement, and restoration of water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams or that protect groundwater from degradation, including compliance.","This project will reduce sediment in the Sand Hill River by approximately 1,500 tons per year. This will be accomplished by installing approximately 80 water and sediment control basins, restoring a coulee immediately upstream of its confluence of the Sand Hill River, and stabilizing 1,200 feet of shoreline by on the Sand Hill River.","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 1789.2 pounds of Phosphorus, 1739.3 tons of Sediment, and 411 tons of Soil Loss. ","Achieved some proposed outcomes",108355,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",397910,10925,"Members for Polk, East SWCD are: Al Bauer, David Kiecker, Kenneth Pederson, Lawrence Vettleson, Scott Balstad",0.5,"Polk, East SWCD","Local/Regional Government",,,,2016-06-17,2020-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Rachel,Klein,"Polk, East SWCD","240 Cleveland Ave. ",Mcintosh,MN,56556,218-563-2777,klein.eastpolk@gmail.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Polk,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-targeted-watershed-polk-east-swcd,http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board,http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board,"Annie Felix-Gerth",2
36623,"2016 Soil and Water Conservation District Capacity Funding ",2016,11000000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(o) ",,"Proposed measurable outcomes TBD",,,,"Clean Water Fund",11000000,,,,"Soil and Water Conservation Districts ","Local/Regional Government","Provides grants to Soil and Water Conservation Districts that focuses on increasing capacity to address four resource concern areasSoil Erosion, Riparian Zone Management, Water Storage and Treatment, and Excess Nutrients. ",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,Marcey,Westrick,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources",,,,,"(651) 296-3767",marcey.westrick@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-soil-and-water-conservation-district-capacity-funding,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","Nicole Clapp ",
36675,"2016 Buffer Law Implementation ",2016,2500000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(e) ",,"Proposed measurable outcomes TBD",,,,"Clean Water Fund",2500000,,,3,"Soil and Water Conservation Districts ","Local/Regional Government","Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. For grants to Soil and Water Conservation Districts to ensure compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements for state required buffers and soil erosion law. ",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Marcey,Westrick,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources",,,,,"(651) 296-3767",marcey.westrick@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-buffer-law-implementation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","Nicole Clapp ",
36690,"2016 Habitat Evaluation ",2016,84000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(i) ",,"10 restoration evaluations ",,,,"Clean Water Fund",84000,,,0.5,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources","Local/Regional Government","This program annually evaluates a sample of up to ten Clean Water Fund restoration projects, provides a report on the evaluations in accordance with state law and delivers communications on project outcomes and lessons learned in restoration practice.",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,"Wade ",Johnson,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ",,,,,"(651) 259-5075 ",Wade.A.Johnson@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-habitat-evaluation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Nicole Clapp",No
36711,"2016 Erosion and Tillage Transect Project",2016,500000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(n) ",,"County, watershed, and state wide estimates of soil erosion caused by water and wind ",,,,,500000,,,0.5,"University of Minnesota ","Local/Regional Government","These funds are being used to systematically collect data and produce statistically valid estimates of the rate of soil erosion and tracking the adoption of high residue cropping systems in in the 67 counties with greater than 30% land in agricultural row crop production. Designed to establish a long term program in Minnesota to collect data and produce county, watershed, and state wide estimates of soil erosion caused by water and wind along with tracking adoption of conservation measures to address erosion. ",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,"Matt ",Drewitz,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources",,,,,"(507) 344-2821",matt.drewitz@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Becker, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Carver, Chippewa, Chisago, Clay, Cottonwood, Dakota, Dodge, Douglas, Faribault, Fillmore, Freeborn, Goodhue, Grant, Houston, Isanti, Jackson, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Le Sueur, Lincoln, Lyon, Mahnomen",,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-erosion-and-tillage-transect-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Nicole Clapp",No
34179,"2016 Itasca SWCD Stormwater implementation grant",2016,141000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project adddresses a commercial and industrial area whiich has higher loading of sediment and phosphorus versus residential areas. An estimated reduction of sediment loading by 2 tons/yr and phosphorus by 8 lbs/yr is expected as a results of this project. ","This project resulted in estimated reductions of 9 lb. of phosphorus and 2 tons of sediment annually",,35250,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",141000,,"Members for Itasca SWCD are: Calvin Saari, Charles Isaacs, Darrel Lauber, Donald Simons, Ted Lovdahl, Jr.",0.14,"Itasca SWCD","Local/Regional Government","This project is the first step toward a regional based implementation approach to reduce phosphorus and total suspended solids in the 12 cities on the Mississippi River. By the time this project is approved, a stormwater retrofit analysis will be completed for the cities, and the MHB will be discussing with them a strategic way to implement the study on a regional scale. By funding this project, you are encouraging the future implementation in a strategic and organized process. At a project level, we are trying to achieve a 50% reduction in total phosphorus and an 80% reduction in Total Suspended Solids, and get the community involved with implementation and educational efforts. The project recommended below will help achieve this objective by implementing a detention basin with educational signage and public trail, with kids and master gardeners involved with the planting of native grasses and pollinator forbes. Educational flyers will be mailed out to landowners in the watershed to educate them about this practice, and activities they can do to keep the Mississippi River healthy and protected. ",,,2016-02-16,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Andy,Arens,"Itasca SWCD","1889 E Hwy 2","Grand Rapids",MN,55744,218-326-0017,andy.arens@itascaswcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Itasca,,"Mississippi River - Grand Rapids",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-itasca-swcd-stormwater-implementation-grant,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Nicole Clapp ",
34180,"2016 St. Croix River Escarpment Taylors Falls Gully Stabilization",2016,220500,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The project is estimated to reduce sediment by 196 tons/yr and phosphorus by 43 lbs/yr ","This project resulted in estimated reductions of 319 lb. of phosphorus per year, 234 tons of sediment per year, 320 tons of soil loss per year, and 7 acre-feet of stormwater volume per year",,66500,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",220500,304,"Members for Chisago SWCD are: Craig Mold, David Tollberg, James Birkholz, Justin Wilson, Roland Cleveland",0.05,"Chisago SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Chisago Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) has had such great success implementing gully stabilization projects along the St. Croix River escarpment that all of the current grant funding has been encumbered towards projects. Two large gully projects, one in the City of Taylors Falls and a second nearby in Interstate State Park, are lined up and ready to go as soon as funding is secured. Both of these gullies are large and have been actively eroding for many years, depositing large loads of sediment and phosphorus directly into the St. Croix River. Both projects are complex because of the many landowners and partners involved, all of whom need to be in agreement for the project to move forward. The SWCD has done the footwork to achieve the necessary partnerships and support, access and permits, and matching funds. Without this grant, this hard-earned opportunity may not be available again. ",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Craig,Mell,"Chisago SWCD","38814 Third Ave","North Branch",MN,55056,651-674-2333,craig.mell@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Chisago,,"Lower St. Croix River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-st-croix-river-escarpment-taylors-falls-gully-stabilization,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Nicole Clapp ",
34185,"2016 Lake Emily Watershed BMP Targeted Implementation Project",2016,287500,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Based on averages calculated from recently constructed WASCOBs in the West Central Area II these WASCOBs have the potential to reduce sediment load by 1,121 T/yr, and 960 lbs/yr of total phosphorus. This project will also result in meeting a total reduction of 15% of the 35% TMDL goal needed to delist Lake Emily completely. ","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 1131.02 lbs of phosphorus, 976.53 tons of sediment, and 2938.06 tons per year of soil loss.","achieved proposed outcomes",71875,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",287500,2,,0.18,"Pope SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Lake Emily Watershed BMP Targeted Implementation Project will provide funding for 48 water and sediment control projects and potential shoreline and riparian restoration. This work would address surface water quality sources identified in the water plan (Section 2-pg 11) including direct drainage from the Lake Emily sub-watersheds (070200050304, 070200050303, 070200050203, 070200050201, 070200050202) the Little Chippewa, and from upstream discharge between Lake Emily and Lake Minnewaska. The Pope County Water Plan has identified surface water quality and erosion control as the top two priority resource concerns in the 2013-2023 Comprehensive Water Plan (page 1-17). These two priorities account for 33% of the phosphorus loading to Lake Emily. Lake Emily is identified in the Eight Lake TMDL study and the Pope County Water plan as being impaired for excessive nutrients. In recent years, Pope County has had rainfall events 2-4 times a summer that have caused severe gully erosions. By utilizing water and sediment control basins as identified in the TMDL implementation plan (section 1.1 page 3) and the Pope County Water Plan (2-25) as a method of lowering the annual load of TSS and TP water quality trends improve and not decline. This proposal will target the highest contributing direct drainage areas to implement projects. Based on averages calculated from past WASCOBs in the West Central area these projects have the potential to reduce the sediment load leaving the field by 1,121 Tons/year of TSS and 960 lbs/year of TP which will directly address 15% of Lake Emily's TP reduction goal for direct drainage from storm water runoff. A Water Quality Decision Support App (WQDSA) has also been completed and projects identified in this application in the medium to highest category will receive priority for funding. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-02-10,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Holly,Kovarik,"Pope SWCD","1680 N. Franklin Street",Glenwood,MN,56334,320-634-4278,holly.kovarik@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Pope,,"Chippewa River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-lake-emily-watershed-bmp-targeted-implementation-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
34186,"2016 Lake Minnewaska Targeted Subwatershed Project Phase III",2016,216900,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The proposed erosion and sediment control projects will assist in alleviating areas of steep grade, and allow for longer periods of infiltration to occur, and temporary storage with underground outlets. These projects have the potential to reduce sediment load by 518 tons/year, and 446 lbs of phosphorus/year. ","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 791.09 lbs of phosphorus, 664.9 tons of sediment, and 776.8 tons per year of soil loss.","achieved proposed outcomes",103889,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",216900,2,,0.05,"Pope SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Pope SWCD has 9 motivated landowners with 21 WASCOBs, 1 lined waterway, and 1 shoreline restoration in two priority sub watersheds (Trappers Run and Minnewaska). Based on averages calculated from recently constructed WASCOBs in the West Central Area II these projects have the potential to reduce TSS by 518 T/year, and 446 lbs./year of TP. This project will provide a secondary benefit to improve downstream water quality to Lake Emily. The project will result in meeting 99% of the Lake Emily TP lbs/yr. TMDL goal from flowage from Lake Minnewaska, 8% TP lbs/yr goal for Strandness, and a total reduction of 6% of the 35% TMDL goal needed to delist Lake Emily. All lakes but Minnewaska are impaired for excessive nutrients and are included in the MPCA 8 Lake TMDL study. Lake Minnewaska (protection status) has impaired lakes upstream and downstream; during 2014/2015 storm events monitoring samples are exceeding state standards. Lake Minnewaska is the 13th largest lake and is a highly valued water resource for public use and at high risk of becoming impaired. Monitoring shows TP averages from 2005-2013 have declined. Since 2005 about 4-6 times a summer heavy rain events are causing severe gully erosions. The water quality trends for Lake Minnewaska are holding based on Pope County Coalition of Lakes Association monitoring but without projects being implemented these trends are at risk to decline. Citizen stream monitoring data in 2014/2015 show storm events that secchi tube readings go from 100 cm + on an average day in tributaries to 7 cm. The spike is coming from ravine and gully erosion within the subwatershed. Utilizing the Water Quality Decision Support App (WQDSA) completed to identify areas where water and sediment control basins and erosion control projects should be implemented has targeted implementation efforts. WASCOBs are in the TMDL implementation plan (section 1.1 page 3) and the Pope County Water Plan (2-25) as a method of lowering the annual TSS and TP. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-07-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Holly,Kovarik,"Pope SWCD","1680 N. Franklin Street",Glenwood,MN,56334,320-634-4278,holly.kovarik@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Pope,,"Chippewa River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-lake-minnewaska-targeted-subwatershed-project-phase-iii,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
34189,"2016 Anti-Icing Production Upgrades",2016,50000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This equipment will help in reducing chloride runoff into Nine Mile Creek by at least 25%, or 300 lbs/year. ","This project resulted in an estimated reduction of 7 lb. of chloride per year.",,125000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",50000,,"Members for Bloomington, City of are: ",0.03,"Bloomington, City of","Local/Regional Government","This project proposes significant improvements to the City of Bloomington's Anti-Icing/Brine making capabilities. The use of anti-icing technology reduces the amount of salt needed to clear snow and ice from city street. The improvements work to address the chloride impairment in Nine Mile Creek and the metro area by reducing the amount of salt applied to the streets and thereby reducing the amount of chlorides entering our surface water systems. These improvements will substantially increase efficiency at which the city can produce an anti-icing blend that will be effective based on the approaching storm characteristics, pavement temperatures, air temperatures, etc... This will allow the city to routinely complete 100% of the anti-icing routes prior to snowfall/freezing rain events with the proper blend for the specific storm event. The improvements to the system also give the City the ability to provide anti-icing blends to other local agencies such as Three Rivers Park District, Hennepin County, Bloomington School District and other nearby Municipalities that are specific for each of their uses. ",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ken,Frosig,"Bloomington, City of",,,,,952-563-8767,kfrosig@bloomingtonmn.gov,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Hennepin,,"Lower Minnesota River ",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-anti-icing-production-upgrades,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Nicole Clapp ",
34200,"2016 AIG - Upper MN WD - PTMApp",2016,123000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7 ","This project will result in the development of the PTMapp in impaired watersheds in Big Stone County. ","Funds were used to successfully develop PTMApp (more at https://ptmapp.bwsr.state.mn.us/). PTMApp is a state-wide desktop and web application to be used by practitioners to provide the technical bridge between the general description of the types of strategies in a local water plan and the identification of implementable on-the-ground Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Conservation Practices (CPs). ","achieved proposed outcomes",30750,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS ",123000,,,0.03,"Upper Minnesota River WD","Local/Regional Government","The Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) is currently being developed for the Minnesota River-Headwaters. Part of the WRAPS and subsequent implementation addresses targeting locations for specific projects (e.g., conservation practices) which are expected to results in measurable water quality benefits for impaired lakes and rivers. Protection strategies are also developed to maintain water quality. This project will complement local implementation efforts and the WRAPS development by conducting a desktop analysis using Prioritize, Target and Measure Application (PTMApp) to target specific projects that will have measurable and cost-effective water quality benefits. The PTMApp uses new methods in high resolution geospatial data to develop detailed information about localized hydrology, pollutant loading, and best management practice (BMP)/conservation practice (CP) placement. This desktop analysis will be used to guide targeted implementation in local water quality planning and day-to-day business. As part of this project, the results of the desktop analysis will also be field verified. A PTMApp has been developed for the lower half of the Minnesota River - Headwaters (MRH) and this project would provide complete coverage of the entire Minnesota portion of the MRH. Clean Water Funds will be used primarily to complete the desktop analysis and develop a cost-effective targeted implementation plan. ",,,2016-01-22,2019-12-23,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Dianne,Radermacher,"Upper Minnesota River WD",,,,,320-839-3411,dianne.radermacher@midconetwork.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Big Stone",,"Minnesota River - Headwaters",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-aig-upper-mn-wd-ptmapp,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
34208,"2016 Red Lake County Multipurpose Drainage Management Grant",2016,102020,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Multipurpose Drainage Management 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The estimated annual reduction in sediment being delivered to the Red Lake River is 740 tons per year for the entire project. ","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 800 tons of Sediment delivered to the Red Lake River through installation of 44 multipurpose drainage management practices along Judicial County Ditch 60, County Ditch 62, and County Ditch 69. ","Achieved proposed outcomes",22794,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",70931,4940,"Members for Red Lake SWCD are: David Bachand, David Miller, Linda Mickelson, Mark Lacrosse, Orville Knott",0.21,"Red Lake SWCD","Local/Regional Government",,,"Red Lake County SWCD will continue to work cooperatively with the Red Lake County Ditch Authority, and the landowners involved to reduce erosion and sedimentation, reduce peak flows and flooding, improve water quality, and protect drainage system efficiency for priority Chapter 103E drainage systems by installing thirty-seven multipurpose drainage management practices. The priority Chapter 103E drainage system is Judicial County Ditch 60. The thirty-seven priority Judicial County Ditch 60 locations were targeted from the information gathered from the 2014 Drainage Ditch Inventory and Inspection grant. The estimated annual reduction in sediment being delivered to the Red Lake River is 740 tons per year for the entire project. Red Lake County SWCD advanced the Drainage Ditch Inventory process by using the Water Quality Decision Support System (WQDSS) tool, created by the International Waters Institute, to help prioritize areas where Multipurpose Drainage Management practices are needed. The Stream Power Index layer of the WQDSS tool indicates which flow paths have the highest erosive power and greatest potential for erosion. This tool helped assist the District with prioritizing and targeting these Multipurpose Drainage Management practice locations. Red Lake County SWCD has already been proactive in selecting locations where multipurpose drainage management practices are needed to reduce soil loss, eliminate sediment deposition in the impaired ditch systems, improve water quality, and reduce maintenance costs with the installation of 72 NRCS Conservation Practice Code 410 practices over the past five years. These locations were identified with assistance from the Red Lake County Ditch Authority (County Ditch 66, County Ditch 2 BR-1, and County Ditch 4). ",2016-02-24,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tanya,Hanson,"Red Lake SWCD","2602 Wheat Dr","Red Lake Falls",MN,56750,"218-253-2593 x111",tanya.hanson@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Red Lake",,"Red Lake River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-red-lake-county-multipurpose-drainage-management-grant-2,,"http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board ","Annie Felix-Gerth ",
34209,"2016 CD8 Erosion and Pollution reduction",2016,32500,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Multipurpose Drainage Management 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project is estimated to have an annual reduction of 41 tons of sediment delivered and 41 pounds of phosphorus delivered to CD8. ","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 24.88 pounds of Phosphorus, 28.77 tons of Sediment, and 38.46 tons of Soil Loss. ","Achieved proposed outcomes",12895,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",32500,1500,"Members for Freeborn SWCD are: Chris Dahl, Colin Wittmer, David Ausen, Donald Kropp, Paul Heers Jr",0.09,"Freeborn SWCD","Local/Regional Government",,,"County Ditch #8 (CD8) has been identified as an area of high erosion by the Freeborn County Drainage Authority and the Turtle Creek Watershed district. Project entails using conservation BMPs such as water and sediment control basins, grassed waterways, and alternative tile intakes to address gully and sheet and rill erosion concerns at the headwaters of CD8. ",2016-02-24,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mark,Schaetzke,"Freeborn SWCD","1400 W Main St","Albert Lea",MN,56007,"507-373-5607 x 3",mark.schaetzke@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Freeborn,,"Cedar River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-cd8-erosion-and-pollution-reduction-3,,"http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board ","Annie Felix-Gerth ",
34250,"2016 Red Lake River Subwatershed (63025) Improvement Projects",2016,194000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The turbidity impairment is based on excess suspended sediment in the river. Excess suspended sediment, when carried to streams can cause excess turbidity that harms aquatic life, increases water-treatment costs, and makes water less useful for recreation. The project will achieve an estimated sediment reduction of 690 tons/year and 590 lbs of phosphorus/year. ","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 361 pounds of Phosphorus, 351 tons of Sediment, 780 tons of Soil Loss, ","Achieved some proposed outcomes",48704,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",194000,2883,"Members for Red Lake SWCD are: David Bachand, David Miller, Linda Mickelson, Mark Lacrosse, Orville Knott",0.34,"Red Lake SWCD","Local/Regional Government",,,"The Red Lake River from County Ditch 96 (Pennington County) to where the Clearwater River enters the Red Lake River (Red Lake Falls) is on the TMDL Impaired Waters List for Turbidity. This reach is a high priority because of the high importance of the Red Lake River, which provides a domestic supply use of the water source and provides abundant recreational uses. Red Lake County SWCD has targeted three sites in the upper portion of the Red Lake River (63025) subwatershed in Red Lake County, with the potential of an additional five to ten more projects, based on data analysis obtained from using the Water Quality Decision Support System (WQDSS) tool, TMDL Impaired Waters List, DNR Stressor ID database, and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) models. The data identified which sub-watersheds were contributing to these impairments, highlighted which fields in those sub-watersheds were contributing the most sediment, and even showed specific locations in the field which were most vulnerable to erosion. Red Lake County SWCD also conducted an Erosion Site Inventory in 2014, which verified the information from the tools/models, and found landowners in these priority areas that were eager to fix the erosion problems on their land. Water Quality Improvement Projects, which include but are not limited to, grade stabilization structures, streambank and shoreland protection, grassed waterways, and water & sediment basins, will be the Best Management Practices implemented to correct the erosion that is occurring at these site locations. Through the implementation of these Best Management Practices, the large amount of sediment that is being contributed from this subwatershed area will be reduced and water quality will be improved. The three proposed installed practices result in the following soil loss reductions numbers: Sediment (TSS) will be 692.90 T/yr., Soil (estimated savings) will be 1,796.67 T/yr. and Phosphorus (est. reduction) will be 588.97 lbs./yr. ",2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tanya,Hanson,"Red Lake SWCD","2602 Wheat Dr","Red Lake Falls",MN,56750,"218-253-2593 x111",tanya.hanson@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Red Lake",,"Red Lake River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2016-red-lake-river-subwatershed-63025-improvement-projects-2,,"http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board ","Annie Felix-Gerth ",
10015571,"2017 - Buffer Law (Becker SWCD)",2016,25000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(e)","[Buffer Law 2017] (e) $2,500,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are for grants to local units of government to enhance compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements.","These funds allow Soil and Water Conservation Districts to ensure compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements for state required buffers and soil erosion law.","Funds used for implementation of Buffer Law within the county.","Achieved proposed outcomes",,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",25000,25000,"Members for Becker SWCD are: Curt Ballard, Eugene Pavelko, Michelle Andresen, Tony Beck, Travis Schauer",0.38,"Becker SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. For grants to Soil and Water Conservation Districts to ensure compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements for state required buffers and soil erosion law. ",,,2016-12-09,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Peter,Mead,"Becker SWCD","809 8th St SE; 809 8th Street SE","Detroit Lakes",MN,56501,218-530-3291,pemead@co.becker.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-buffer-law-becker-swcd,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Marcey Westrick",2
10015572,"2017 - Buffer Law (Mahnomen SWCD)",2016,20000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(e)","[Buffer Law 2017] (e) $2,500,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are for grants to local units of government to enhance compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements.","These funds allow Soil and Water Conservation Districts to ensure compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements for state required buffers and soil erosion law.","Funds used for implementation of Buffer Law within the county. This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 54 lbs of phosphorus, 31 tons of sediment, and 90 tons per year of soil loss.","Achieved proposed outcomes",,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",20000,20000,"Members for Mahnomen SWCD are: Jerry Handyside, Mike Geray, Peter Revier, Terry McCollum, Victor Eiynck",0.08,"Mahnomen SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. For grants to Soil and Water Conservation Districts to ensure compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements for state required buffers and soil erosion law. ",,,2016-12-12,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Aaron,Neubert,"Mahnomen SWCD","200 US HWY 59",Mahnomen,MN,56557,"218-935-2987 x 3",neubert@outlook.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-buffer-law-mahnomen-swcd,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Marcey Westrick",2
10015573,"2017 - Buffer Law (Renville SWCD)",2016,45000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(e)","[Buffer Law 2017] (e) $2,500,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are for grants to local units of government to enhance compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements.","These funds allow Soil and Water Conservation Districts to ensure compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements for state required buffers and soil erosion law.","Funds used for implementation of Buffer Law within the county.","Achieved proposed outcomes",,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",45000,43966,"Members for Renville SWCD are: Dean Schroeder, Jim Hebrink, Kathryn K Kelly, Kevin Kokesch, Mark Koenig",,"Renville SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. For grants to Soil and Water Conservation Districts to ensure compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements for state required buffers and soil erosion law. ",,,2016-12-12,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Holly,Hatlewick,"Renville SWCD","1008 West Lincoln Street",Olivia,MN,56277,320-523-1550,holly.hatlewick@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-buffer-law-renville-swcd,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Marcey Westrick",2
36626,"2017 - CCMI Directed CWF - Conservation Corps - CCMI (SAGENCY)",2016,500000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(r) using funds appropriated in Laws of Minnesota 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 4, Article 2, Section 7(b) ",,"Direct appropriation to the Conservation Corps of MN & IA. Final outcomes will be provided at grant closeout.",,,,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",500000,,"Members for Conservation Corps MN & IA are:",,"Conservation Corps MN & IA","Local/Regional Government","A legislative directive provides Clean Water Funds to be contracted for services with the Conservation Corps of Minnesota. Through these grants, the Corps funds crew labor to eligible local governments through an application process hosted by the Conservation Corps.",,,2015-10-05,2017-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,Tim,Johnson-Grass,"Conservation Corps MN & IA","2715 Upper Afton Rd Ste 100","Saint Paul",MN,55119,651-209-9900,tim.johnson-grass@conservationcorps.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-ccmi-directed-cwf-conservation-corps-ccmi-sagency,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Nicole Clapp",No
36712,"2017 Erosion and Tillage Transect Project",2016,500000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(n) ",,"County, watershed, and state wide estimates of soil erosion caused by water and wind ",,,,,500000,,,0.5,"University of Minnesota ","Local/Regional Government","These funds are being used to systematically collect data and produce statistically valid estimates of the rate of soil erosion and tracking the adoption of high residue cropping systems in counties with greater than 30% land in agricultural row crop production. Designed to establish a long term program in Minnesota to collect data and produce county, watershed, and state wide estimates of soil erosion caused by water and wind along with tracking adoption of conservation measures to address erosion. ",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,"Matt ",Drewitz,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources",,,,,"(507) 344-2821",matt.drewitz@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Becker, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Carver, Chippewa, Chisago, Clay, Cottonwood, Dakota, Dodge, Douglas, Faribault, Fillmore, Freeborn, Goodhue, Grant, Houston, Isanti, Jackson, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Le Sueur, Lincoln, Lyon, Mahnomen",,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-erosion-and-tillage-transect-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Nicole Clapp",No
34214,"CD 8 Subwatershed Sediment Reduction Project",2016,147700,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","By addressing the 23 priority input sites and bank stabilization site, the project partners have estimated a 277.3 ton/yr reduction in sediment. The project will also reduce phosphorus discharged into the Roseau River by 277.3 lbs annually. ","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 278.26 tons of sediment.","achieved proposed outcomes",36925,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",147700,2,,0.1,"Roseau River WD","Local/Regional Government","A collaboration between the Roseau County SWCD and the Roseau River Watershed District (RRWD), the CD 8 Subwatershed Sediment Reduction Project will reduce sediment delivery to the Roseau River by implementing Best Management Practices on sites that have been identified as the greatest contributors of sediment. Sites were prioritized based on modeled data from the Watershed District's Site Prioritization Grant, and the International Watershed Institutes's Water Quality Decision Support Application (WQDSA) and local knowledge of the subwatershed. Under this project 21 side-water inlets, 2 grade stabilization drop structures and 325 linear feet of channel stabilization will retain soil on the landscape and keep 277.3 tons of sediment from reaching the Roseau River which is impaired due to turbidity. The project focuses on the greatest contributors of sediment identified within the subwatershed. The Roseau County SWCD and RRWD have successfully collaborated on previous projects implementing best management practices. Relying on previous project experience, local knowledge and technical abilities of SWCD and Watershed staff will ensure efficient use of public dollars to improve water quality in the Roseau River. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-02-14,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tracy,Halstensgard,"Roseau River WD","PO Box 26",Roseau,MN,567510026,218-463-0313,rrwd@mncable.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Roseau,,"Roseau River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/cd-8-subwatershed-sediment-reduction-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
34285,"Advancing Safe and Sustainable Water Reuse in Minnesota",2020,250000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 8","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are to create a road map for water reuse implementation in Minnesota and to address research gaps by studying Minnesota water reuse systems. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","An interagency workgroup is developing recommendations for best practices and policies for water reuse in Minnesota. Recommendations will include both regulatory and non-regulatory approaches to successful implementation of water reuse. The workgroup will evaluate current regulations, practices, and barriers, and quantify and determine acceptable health risks associated with water reuse applications. The University of Minnesota is collecting and analyzing field data for use in targeting Minnesota-specific risks. Stakeholders will be engaged to share perspectives on opportunities and barriers to reuse and provide guidance and feedback on policy and best practice recommendations.","Water reuse will be an increasingly important part of managing our water resources as demands on our water supplies continue to grow due to population increases, urbanization, climate change, and changes in water use. There are scattered examples of reclaiming municipal wastewater, stormwater, and graywater systems in Minnesota. However, those interested in reuse often run into regulatory roadblocks, technical challenges, or lacking and inconsistent regulations and standard practices.","The workgroup is comprised of representatives from Minnesota Departments of Agriculture, Health, Labor and Industry, and Natural Resources, Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council, Plumbing Board, University of Minnesota Water Resources Center, and Board of Water and Soil Resources. The University of Minnesota is a research partner.",2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Anita,Anderson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,(218)302-6143,anita.c.anderson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Planning, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/advancing-safe-and-sustainable-water-reuse-minnesota,,,,
34285,"Advancing Safe and Sustainable Water Reuse in Minnesota",2017,175000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (g)","$175,000 the first year and $175,000 the second year are to prepare a comprehensive study of and recommendations for regulatory and nonregulatory approaches to water reuse for use in the development of state policy for water reuse in Minnesota. ","A report to include recommendations for practices and policy for water reuse in Minnesota is scheduled for completion in June, 2017. ",,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","An interagency workgroup is developing recommendations for best practices and policies for water reuse in Minnesota. Recommendations will include both regulatory and non-regulatory approaches to successful implementation of water reuse. The workgroup will evaluate current regulations, practices, and barriers, and quantify and determine acceptable health risks associated with water reuse applications. The University of Minnesota is collecting and analyzing field data for use in targeting Minnesota-specific risks. Stakeholders will be engaged to share perspectives on opportunities and barriers to reuse and provide guidance and feedback on policy and best practice recommendations.","Water reuse will be an increasingly important part of managing our water resources as demands on our water supplies continue to grow due to population increases, urbanization, climate change, and changes in water use. There are scattered examples of reclaiming municipal wastewater, stormwater, and graywater systems in Minnesota. However, those interested in reuse often run into regulatory roadblocks, technical challenges, or lacking and inconsistent regulations and standard practices.","The workgroup is comprised of representatives from Minnesota Departments of Agriculture, Health, Labor and Industry, and Natural Resources, Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council, Plumbing Board, University of Minnesota Water Resources Center, and Board of Water and Soil Resources. The University of Minnesota is a research partner.",2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Anita,Anderson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,(218)302-6143,anita.c.anderson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Planning, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/advancing-safe-and-sustainable-water-reuse-minnesota,,,,
34285,"Advancing Safe and Sustainable Water Reuse in Minnesota",2016,175000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (g)","$175,000 the first year and $175,000 the second year are to prepare a comprehensive study of and recommendations for regulatory and nonregulatory approaches to water reuse for use in the development of state policy for water reuse in Minnesota. ","A report to include recommendations for practices and policy for water reuse in Minnesota is scheduled for completion in June, 2017. ",,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","An interagency workgroup is developing recommendations for best practices and policies for water reuse in Minnesota. Recommendations will include both regulatory and non-regulatory approaches to successful implementation of water reuse. The workgroup will evaluate current regulations, practices, and barriers, and quantify and determine acceptable health risks associated with water reuse applications. The University of Minnesota is collecting and analyzing field data for use in targeting Minnesota-specific risks. Stakeholders will be engaged to share perspectives on opportunities and barriers to reuse and provide guidance and feedback on policy and best practice recommendations.","Water reuse will be an increasingly important part of managing our water resources as demands on our water supplies continue to grow due to population increases, urbanization, climate change, and changes in water use. There are scattered examples of reclaiming municipal wastewater, stormwater, and graywater systems in Minnesota. However, those interested in reuse often run into regulatory roadblocks, technical challenges, or lacking and inconsistent regulations and standard practices.","The workgroup is comprised of representatives from Minnesota Departments of Agriculture, Health, Labor and Industry, and Natural Resources, Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Council, Plumbing Board, University of Minnesota Water Resources Center, and Board of Water and Soil Resources. The University of Minnesota is a research partner.",2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Anita,Anderson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,(218)302-6143,anita.c.anderson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Planning, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/advancing-safe-and-sustainable-water-reuse-minnesota,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2025,4799000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (c) $4,799,000 the first year and $4,799,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ",,,,,,,,,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2024,4799000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (c) $4,799,000 the first year and $4,799,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","The following are cumulative measures as of 6/30/2024 Individuals have received loans in 72 counties 2,400 loans have been issued with Clean Water Funds 233 loans related to agricultural waste management 981 loans related to structural erosion control 124 loans related to conservation tillage 947 loans addressing septic systems 115 other practices Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans is $34,629,214 ",,6778024,,560890,11188,,0.43,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2023,75000,"M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","The following are cumulative measures as of 6/30/2023:  Individuals have received loans in 69 counties 2,253 loans have been issued with Clean Water Funds 212 loans related to agricultural waste management 981 loans related to structural erosion control 92 loans related to conservation tillage 881 loans addressing septic systems 87 other practices Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans is $34,629,214 ",,4501223,,,61382,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2022,75000,"M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","The following are cumulative measures as of 12/5/2022.  Individuals have received loans in 59 counties 2,212 loans have been issued with Clean Water Funds 203 loans related to agricultural waste management 981 loans related to structural erosion control 79 loans related to conservation tillage 869 loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans is $30,127,991 ",,,,,61382,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2021,75000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans On and On an individual basis, to what degree or what extent have the loans helped farmers implement conservation practices? Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ",,,,,,45187,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2020,75000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans On and On an individual basis, to what degree or what extent have the loans helped farmers implement conservation practices? Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","As of 12/31/2020 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,065 loans totaling an amount of $27,338,954.65. The program has leveraged $40,634,600. Under the revolving framework, the appropriations have been used 2 times. By practice type: 187 loans were for agricultural waste management projects; 980 structural erosion control 55 conservation tillage equipment; 784 for septic systems upgrades or relocation; and 59 other.  ",,,,,45187,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2019,75000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans On and On an individual basis, to what degree or what extent have the loans helped farmers implement conservation practices? Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","As of 12/31/2018 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 1,313 loans totaling an amount of $21,068,940.59. By practice type, 158 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 34 for conservation tillage equipment, and 718 for septic systems upgrades or relocation. At this time the program has leveraged 42% of the total cost of projects. Overall, Clean Water funded AgBMP loans have leveraged $18,575,534. ",,,"The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. The MDA defines “leveraged” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project. As of December 31, 2019, the total amount of leveraged funds was $18,575,534. ",,45103,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2018,75000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ",,,,,45103,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2017,75000,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Section 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ",,,"The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. The MDA defines “leveraged” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project. ",,33288,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2016,75000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ",,,"Every loan is issued from one of five sources of funds. This includes both federal and state sources. Currently, loans supported by the Clean Water Fund must be used to implement recommended practices identified in a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan.  All other appropriations in the AgBMP account and their revolving revenue may be used anywhere in the state. The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. The MDA defines “leveraged” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project. As of January 18, 2017 the total dollars leveraged was $8,370,202.00. ",,33288,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2015,200000,"M.L.2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (c) $200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $170,000 each year is for transfer to an agricultural and environmental revolving account created under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117, subdivision 5a, and is available for pass-through to local government and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Number of loans issued using monies from the Clean Water Fund (667 loans)Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans (47 counties)Number of loans issued per category: septic systems (542), conservation tillage (28), ag waste management (96)Number of loans addressing subsurface sewage treatment-   Phosphorus load reduction (lbs), TSS load reduction (lbs)Number of loans related to conservation tillage-   Number of acres affected, sediment loss reductions (tons)Number of loans related to agricultural waste management-   Number of animal units managed, total phosphorus managed (tons), total nitrogen managed (tons) Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor progress and impact of the Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Performance Reports in 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of this report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures.The MDA's AgBMP Loan Program  provides data for performance measure EDWOM9: Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions, FM4: Total dollars awarded in grants and contracts to non-state agency partners and FM5: Total dollars leveraged by Clean Water Fund implementation activities. ","As of December 31, 2015 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 667 loans totaling an amount of $12,871,313. Ninety six (96) loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 542 for septic systems upgrades or relocation and 28 for conservation tillage equipment. At this time the program has leveraged 39% of the total cost of projects. Overall, Clean Water funded AgBMP loans have leveraged $8,134,370. The amount reported in FY 15 ($1,636,049) represents dollars leveraged in FY14 and FY15.Estimates of pollutant load reductions are available upon request.  ",,,"Every loan is issued from one of five sources of funds. This includes both federal and state sources. Currently, loans supported by the Clean Water Fund must be used to implement recommended practices identified in a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan. All other appropriations in the AgBMP account and their revolving revenue may be used anywhere in the state. ",,1350,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2014,200000,"M.L.2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (c) $200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $170,000 each year is for transfer to an agricultural and environmental revolving account created under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117, subdivision 5a, and is available for pass-through to local government and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Number of loans issued using monies from the Clean Water FundNumber of counties where individuals are receiving loansNumber of loans issued per category (septic systems, conservation tillage, ag waste management)/ percent issued per categoryNumber of loans addressing subsurface sewage treatment-   Phosphorus load reduction (lbs), TSS load reduction (lbs)Number of loans related to conservation tillage-   Number of acres affected, sediment loss reductions (tons)Number of loans related to agricultural waste management-   Number of animal units managed, total phosphorus managed (tons), total nitrogen managed (tons)  Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor progress and impact of the Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Performance Reports in 2012 and 2014. At the heart of this report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures.The MDA's AgBMP Loan Program provided data for performance measure EDWOM9: Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions, FM4: Total dollars awarded in grants and contracts to non-state agency partners and FM5: Total dollars leveraged by Clean Water Fund implementation activities.  ","As of September 22, 2014 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 456 loans totaling an amount of $9,500,000. Eighty four (84) loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 344 for septic systems upgrades or relocation and 28 for conservation tillage equipment. At this time the program has leveraged 45% of the total cost of projects. Overall, Clean Water funded Ag BMP loans have leveraged $7,500,000.Estimates of pollutant load reductions are avialable upon request. ",,,,,1350,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2013,4500000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(c) $4,500,000 the first year and $4,500,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $3,500,000 the first year and at least $3,900,000 the second year are for transfer to the clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,3261890,,,1350,,"0.5 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2012,4500000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(c) $4,500,000 the first year and $4,500,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $3,500,000 the first year and at least $3,900,000 the second year are for transfer to the clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,2522477,"The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. MDA defines “leverage” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project.As of May 1, 2013, the total amount of leveraged funds was $6,354,833.",,1350,,"0.5 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2011,2500000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (e) $2,000,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are for the agricultural best management practices loan program. At least $1,800,000 the first year and at least $2,200,000 the second year are for transfer to a clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year.","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,,,,2700,,"1 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2010,2000000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (e) $2,000,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are for the agricultural best management practices loan program. At least $1,800,000 the first year and at least $2,200,000 the second year are for transfer to a clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year.","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,,,,2025,,"0.75 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,,
33824,"Aitkin County Soil and Water Conservation District Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG): Mississippi River-Brainerd Watershed Lake & Stream Sampling",2016,25526,,,,,,,,,,,0.16,"Aitkin County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Aitkin County Soil and Water Conservation District will partner with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local volunteers to conduct water quality monitoring in high priority areas of the Upper Mississippi River (Brainerd) Watershed. Four lakes will be sampled, including Sheriff, Rabbit, French, and Section Twelve. Four stream/river sites will be monitored including the Rice River (2 sites), Ripple River, and Sissabagama Creek. Through this effort we will obtain information that will be useful in assessing the health of this watershed. This will be valuable in planning for future restoration and protection efforts that will ensure good water and environmental quality in Aitkin County. ",,"Mississippi River - Brainerd Watershed ",2016-03-02,2018-01-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Janet,Smude,"Aitkin County Soil and Water Conservation District","130 Southgate Drive",Aitkin,MN,56431,"(218) 927-6565",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Aitkin,,"Mississippi River - Brainerd",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aitkin-county-soil-and-water-conservation-district-surface-water-assessment-grant-swag-miss,,,,
33413,"Amador Twp - Almelund SSD",2016,194630,"MS Section 446A.075","Small Community Wastewater Treatment Program","Fix failing septic systems by building community wastewater system","Fix failing septic systems by building community wastewater system",,216600,BWSR,,,,,"Amador Township","Local/Regional Government","Construct sewer collection and treatment system for unsewered area",,,2015-10-02,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jeff,Freeman,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority","332 Minnesota Street, Suite W820","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 259-7465",jeff.freeman@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority ",,Chisago,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/amador-twp-almelund-ssd-0,,,,
31584,"Aquifer Testing for Stream Flow and Groundwater Interactions",2016,,"M.L. 2014 Ch. 312 Art. 14 Sec. 7","The remaining balance of the appropriation in Laws 2011 First Special Session chapter 6 article 2section 6 paragraph (g) to the commissioner of natural resources for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance and maintaining and updating data may be used for stream flow and groundwater monitoring including the installation of additional monitoring gauges and monitoring necessary to determine the relationship between stream flow and groundwater and is available until June 30 2015. ","In FY 16 we will do a minimum of two additional aquifer tests. Both will involve the construction and test pumping of production wells drilled into the Jordan Sandstone. We will complete reports summarizing the outcomes of all the aquifer tests will be completed in FY16. We will also purchase and install monitoring equipment for the observation wells drilled for the aquifer tests.","In FY16 aquifer testing was completed at nine locations to study interactions between surface water and groundwater. The tests provide empirical data for groundwater modeling in Dakota County and the Little Rock Creek area. Test drilling was done at six other sites also to study surface/groundwater interactions. At five of these sites wells were constructed to monitor groundwater levels. The wells were added to the groundwater monitoring network.",,,,260678,,,1.3,,,"This project is studying the response of certain aquifers to groundwater pumping. Research involves an aquifer test, which is an experiment where a well is pumped at a known, constant, pumping rate; changes in groundwater levels and stream flows in the areas around the aquifer test site are observed while the well is being pumped. These tests help us understand how groundwater flows between aquifers, which are underground rock and sand layers that hold water. Understanding the interactions between shallow and deep aquifers and surface water is important for managing groundwater supplies. This information is critical in deciding how much groundwater can be pumped – and from which aquifers – to ensure the long-term sustainability of the water supply and the natural resources that rely on groundwater.","In some streams, groundwater is a significant source of stream flow. This groundwater can be important in sustaining species like trout that need a constant flow of cold, clean water. The groundwater comes from an aquifer, which is an underground deposit of porous rock or sand that holds water. Groundwater pumping from wells drilled into shallow aquifers that feed the stream may decrease the amount of groundwater flowing into the stream. This is a concern because pumping can threaten the ability of some stream to support trout in the future. Drilling wells into deeper aquifers could be a solution to concerns about effects of pumping from the shallow aquifers. However, aquifers can be connected, and pumping in one aquifer can lower water levels in the aquifers above or below it. The strategy of drilling deeper only works when thick layers of clay and shale act as a protective barrier between aquifers. But it is difficult to predict how water moves between a given set of aquifers without special tests designed to detect responses from pumping in nearby aquifers and surface waters.",,2014-07-01,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Dakota,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-testing-stream-flow-and-groundwater-interactions,,,,
31584,"Aquifer Testing for Stream Flow and Groundwater Interactions",2015,381896,"M.L. 2014 Ch. 312 Art. 14 Sec. 7","The remaining balance of the appropriation in Laws 2011 First Special Session chapter 6 article 2section 6 paragraph (g) to the commissioner of natural resources for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance and maintaining and updating data may be used for stream flow and groundwater monitoring including the installation of additional monitoring gauges and monitoring necessary to determine the relationship between stream flow and groundwater and is available until June 30 2015. ","In FY15 the DNR will install observation wells monitor stream flow and conduct at least one aquifer test using continuous pumping to measure the response of nearby aquifer levels and stream flow.","In FY15 the DNR installed four observation wells monitored stream flow (at 4 sites) and conducted an aquifer test using the City of Lakeville’s Well #3 which draws from the Jordan Sandstone aquifer. The well was pumped for 7 days; we checked water levels and stream flows at the surrounding observation wells and monitoring sites over 34 days to see if we could observe changes in groundwater levels and stream flows in the surrounding area during and after the time the well was being pumped. We also drilled a test production well (a temporary high-capacity well used to stress the system to detect changes during pumping) on the Vermillion River Wildlife Management Area at a site adjacent to existing observation wells (wells strictly used to check levels of groundwater) that are part of our statewide groundwater monitoring system. A test well was drilled into the Prairie du Chien aquifer and was pumped to quantify the impacts to the local aquifers and the Vermillion River and to refine aquifer characteristics of the Prairie du Chien aquifer. Data from the tests gives us the information we need to develop computer models which will predict effects from groundwater pumping on trout streams in the southern Metro region.",,,,281486,,,1.2,,,"This project is studying the response of certain aquifers to groundwater pumping. Research involves an aquifer test, which is an experiment where a well is pumped at a known, constant, pumping rate; changes in groundwater levels and stream flows in the areas around the aquifer test site are observed while the well is being pumped. These tests help us understand how groundwater flows between aquifers, which are underground rock and sand layers that hold water. Understanding the interactions between shallow and deep aquifers and surface water is important for managing groundwater supplies. This information is critical in deciding how much groundwater can be pumped – and from which aquifers – to ensure the long-term sustainability of the water supply and the natural resources that rely on groundwater.","In some streams, groundwater is a significant source of stream flow. This groundwater can be important in sustaining species like trout that need a constant flow of cold, clean water. The groundwater comes from an aquifer, which is an underground deposit of porous rock or sand that holds water. Groundwater pumping from wells drilled into shallow aquifers that feed the stream may decrease the amount of groundwater flowing into the stream. This is a concern because pumping can threaten the ability of some stream to support trout in the future. Drilling wells into deeper aquifers could be a solution to concerns about effects of pumping from the shallow aquifers. However, aquifers can be connected, and pumping in one aquifer can lower water levels in the aquifers above or below it. The strategy of drilling deeper only works when thick layers of clay and shale act as a protective barrier between aquifers. But it is difficult to predict how water moves between a given set of aquifers without special tests designed to detect responses from pumping in nearby aquifers and surface waters.",,2014-07-01,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Dakota,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-testing-stream-flow-and-groundwater-interactions,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2025,2000000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(e)","$2,000,000 the first year and $2,000,000 the second year are for water-supply planning, aquifer protection, and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds near the City of Warren. Provide technical support for community water supply planning upon request. Continue to populate the Aquifer Properties Database. Continue technical support for three well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Drill 16 groundwater level monitoring wells. North Branch Pipestone Creek Complete numerical flow model and develop model scenarios to support evaluation of groundwater-use management alternatives. Little Rock Creek Area Provide technical support for the Little Rock Creek Water-Use Conflict project, assisting the contractor team with model applications and data requests. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Complete evaluation of the effects of groundwater uses on selected lake water levels. Determine other groundwater and surface-water evaluation objectives and priorities. Review and compare water level data from all DNR observation wells in BVGWMA to sustainability thresholds. North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area Continue to provide technical guidance and support to the DNR GWMA team as needed. Continue providing technical support for the White Bear Lake Area Comprehensive Plan Work Group (Metropolitan Council) and the Project 1007 contamination investigation and remediation project (MPCA) through model analyses and data requests. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2024,2000000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(e)","$2,000,000 the first year and $2,000,000 the second year are for water-supply planning, aquifer protection, and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds near the City of Warren. Continue technical support for community water supply planning. Continue technical support for new well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Continue support for Aquifer Properties Database. Continue to support Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies. Drill 15 groundwater level monitoring wells. Develop analytical tools to assess water availability and identify areas that are at greater risk of overuse. Little Rock Creek Area Continue to provide technical support to the DNR team working with stakeholders on resolving the water-use conflict and implementing the Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area action plan. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Complete the regional and local-area (focused on the Bangor Waterfowl Production Area), numerical flow models. Evaluate the effects of groundwater uses on basin water levels and surface area relative to scenarios without groundwater use in the area surrounding the basins. Work with the DNR GWMA team to refine groundwater and surface-water evaluation objectives and priorities. North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area Continue to provide technical guidance and support to the DNR GWMA team as needed. Continue to participate in review of projects closely related to GWMA management objectives, including but not limited to Project 1007 contamination investigation modeling (MPCA) and Landlocked Basin Comprehensive Planning Study (Valley Branch Watershed District). "," Continued monitoring water levels in the City of Crookston well field. Coordination and technical support for Moorhead Public Services regarding groundwater use concerns. Evaluation and resolution of 4 well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Drilled 33 new groundwater level monitoring wells. Updated Groundwater Trends analysis for period 2003-2022. Continued populating the Aquifer Properties database. North Branch Pipestone Creek Developed a conceptual model for construction of a groundwater-flow model to investigate aquifer sustainability and surface water-groundwater interaction. Began design and construction of the numerical groundwater-flow model. Little Rock Creek Area                              Continued to provide technical support to the DNR team working with stakeholders on resolving the water-use conflict and implementing the Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area action plan. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Completed a preliminary version of the regional numerical flow model. Began evaluation of the effects of groundwater uses on selected lake water levels. Continued to work with the DNR GWMA team to refine groundwater and surface-water evaluation objectives and priorities. North & East Metro Groundwater Management Area Continued to provide technical guidance and support to the DNR GWMA team as needed. Continued providing review and/or technical support for projects closely related to GWMA management objectives, including but not limited to Project 1007 contamination investigation modeling (MPCA), Landlocked Basin Comprehensive Planning Study (Valley Branch Watershed District), and White Bear Lake Area Comprehensive Plan Work Group (Metropolitan Council).   ",,,,2279549,283976,,11.9,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2023,1850000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(e)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Little Rock Creek: Finalize the scenarios-analysis report and continue to provide technical support as DNR works with permit holders to reduce base-flow impacts. Continue populating the Aquifer Properties database.  LCCMR has provided funds to accelerate this program.  Existing staff will continue to support this project with technical review and analysis. Provide groundwater technical reviews for City of Goodview, City of Corcoran, and City of Rogers water supply plans. Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds for aquifers serving Ham Lake domestic wells and Blaine municipal wells. Provide groundwater technical support for local efforts to develop conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water by high volume water users in counties along the Minnesota/South/North Dakota borders. Finalize groundwater sustainability report for aquifers near City of Warren and Marshall-Polk Rural Water System.  Report will focus on local groundwater water availability, developing groundwater sustainability limits, groundwater level water level monitoring needs, and water supply resilience. Completion of nine Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) reports. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area: Adjust the Soil-Water-Budget model to improve the groundwater-flow model.  Construct steady-state and transient versions of a regional groundwater-flow model and develop a local sub-model for at least one focus area. Drill 12 groundwater level monitoring wells. "," Ongoing technical support for community water supply planning, notably for growing metro-area communities Technical support to protect City of Warren water supply through delineation of aquifer extent and thickness and evaluation of groundwater levels compared to historic groundwater use Evaluation and resolution of 50 well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Drilled 13 new groundwater level monitoring wells. Completed 3 GRAPS reports. Little Rock Creek Area                                                                                              Completed the report entitled, “Evaluation of Conceptual Groundwater-Use Management Actions, Little Rock Creek Area.” Provided technical support for establishing sustainable diversion limits for Little Rock Creek and to the DNR team working with stakeholders on implementing the Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area action plan. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Made improvements to the Soil Water Balance (SWB) model code and refined the SWB model for the BV area. Extracted SWB computed aerial recharge, runoff to sinks, and runoff to lakes and formatted for input to the MODFLOW groundwater-flow model. Constructed a regional, steady-state l MODFLOW model for the BV area and made model refinements and improvements. Updated observations data sets. Began building a transient model and local-area model focused on the Bangor Waterfowl Production Area North & East Metro Groundwater Management Area Participated in meetings and reviewed and provided feedback on technical documents for external projects closely related to GWMA management objectives: Project 1007 contamination investigation modeling (MPCA) and Landlocked Basin Comprehensive Planning Study (Valley Branch Watershed District). Provided technical guidance and support to the GWMA management team. ",,,,1234372,269724,,12.2,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2022,1850000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(e)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Little Rock Creek: Develop and evaluate scenarios that test concepts to reduce/mitigate streamflow diversions. Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds near the City of Warren. Continue populating the Aquifer Properties database. Continue technical support for community water supply planning. Continue support for the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) program. Bonanza Valley GWMA: Begin construction of groundwater flow model that incorporates surface hydrological inputs and characterizes groundwater recharge and evapotranspiration. Drill nine groundwater level monitoring wells. "," Little Rock Creek Area:  Delineated the estimated extent of influence of groundwater-sourced irrigation on stream base flow Developed and analyzed model scenarios to explore each of four types of management actions outlined in the Little Rock Creek Area management plan: 1) augmentation of low streamflow with well water, 2) wider adoption of water conservation practices, 3) replacing irrigation wells close to the stream network with more distant wells, and 4) reductions in permitted use (via targeted reductions in acres irrigated). Produces a technical a report describing the results of model-scenario analyses and how the results can be used to inform water-appropriations management. Continued enhanced groundwater monitoring, including permittee owned observation wells continues in the LRC area. Technical support to protect City of Warren water supply through preparation of geologic and hydrogeologic tools, development of a groundwater monitoring plan, and crafting water level thresholds for nearby high-capacity irrigation appropriators. 38 aquifer test reports were added to the Aquifer Properties database. Groundwater technical support for development of Marshall-Polk Rural Water System’s Water Supply Plan and Well Head Protection Plan. Continue support for the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) program. Hydrographs and trends were completed for 4 watersheds, with 86 hydrographs produced. Water use data were compiled for all 11 1W1P areas. One GRAPs report was completed. Created new statewide GIS hydrography feature class: Groundwater Dominated Lakes. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area: Updated the Quaternary geological model using newly available well-records data. Developed a draft Soil Water Balance (SWB) model for the area.  Modeled ET and irrigation demand based on two years of reported results for an ongoing field study at the Rosholt Research Farm (located in the GWMA) using both the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and SWB. Developed a conceptual model for construction of the groundwater-flow model. Began design and construction of the numerical groundwater-flow model. Drilled 6 new groundwater level monitoring wells. ",,,,1499159,219410,,11.6,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2021,2075000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$2075000 the first year and $2075000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY21 DNR staff will: Evaluate pumping scenarios using the LRC groundwater model. Investigate water level sustainability issues near Warren MN. Continue populating the Aquifer Properties database. Continue technical support for community water supply planning. Continue support for the GRAPs program. Provide modeling support to Moorhead's well field expansion. Initiate groundwater model construction of the Bonanza Valley GWMA. Drill 12 groundwater level monitoring wells. Support Rochester's modeling and calcareous fen protection strategy. ","FY21 Measurable Outcomes: Finalized the Little Rock Creek hydrologic analyses report. Performed a series of tests and scenarios to explore the relationship between existing pumping locations and computed streamflow diversions. Added 228 aquifer tests to the Aquifer Properties database. Prioritization supports the County Geologic Atlas program and Groundwater Management Areas. Reviewed 16 groundwater-based community water supply plans. Updated well locations glacial geology and hydrography data sets for the Bonanza Valley GWMA. Completed the groundwater availability portion of four GRAPS reports. Created 87 hydrographs comparing groundwater levels to reported pumping volumes and climate data within eight GRAPS watersheds. Installed 14 groundwater level monitoring wells across five counties. Carried out a series of White Bear Lake direct-withdrawal scenarios to support determining a maximum collective annual withdrawal from WBL. Developed 2040 N&E Metro pumping scenarios with alternative water sources for several communities. ",,,,1404654,193468,,12.5,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2020,2075000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$2075000 the first year and $2075000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY20 DNR staff will: Evaluate pumping scenarios using the updated Little Rock Creek groundwater model. Populate the Aquifer Properties database. Incorporate groundwater level data into the draft Polk/Red Lake county border aquifer sustainability monitoring plan. Develop water level thresholds as needed. Continue providing high level technical support for communities developing water supply plans. Update the statewide “changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis incorporating water level data collected through 2019. Initiate data compilation for a groundwater model in Dakota County. Coordinate model development with county and Met Council staff. Continue support of the GRAPs program. Compile existing data develop work plans and initiate construction of a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. Install approximately 20 new monitoring wells in greater Minnesota. ","In FY20 DNR staff: Incorporated 2014-2018 streamflow and pumping data into the Little Rock Creek (LRC) groundwater model. Added 193 aquifer tests to the Aquifer Properties database. Prioritization supports the County Geologic Atlas program and Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA). Red Lake/Polk County groundwater level and pumping data were used to develop water level thresholds for the Crookston municipal well field. Reviewed 23 groundwater based community water supply plans. Updated the statewide “Changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis using water level data collected through 2019. Participated in meetings with Dakota county staff to define modeling objectives. Began data compilation and model boundary development for Bonanza Valley GWMA. Checked and updated 517 well locations for the Bonanza Valley GWMA. Completed the groundwater availability portion of six GRAPS reports. Created 53 hydrographs comparing groundwater levels to reported pumping volumes and climate data within nine GRAPS watersheds. Installed 18 groundwater level monitoring wells. Developed a 2040 pumping-demand scenario and evaluated the impact to White Bear Lake. Analyzed drawdown for hypothetical Mt. Simon aquifer pumping in White Bear Lake and White Bear Twp. Archived over 700 000 groundwater level and temperature readings from Straight River GWMA observation wells. ",,,,1367151,238627,,11.4,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2019,1375000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY19 DNR staff will: • Incorporate monitoring data from 2014 through 2018 into the Little Rock Creek groundwater model. • Populate the Aquifer Properties database. • Develop a groundwater monitoring plan to address well interference and aquifer sustainability issues along the Polk/Red Lake county border. • Continue providing technical support for communities developing water supply plans. • Update the statewide “changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis. • Continue groundwater modeling with the City of Moorhead. • Continue providing technical support and review to the City of Rochester for groundwater modeling and water supply analysis. • Apply the North Metro Lakes Groundwater Model in support of the Ramsey County District Court Order and water supply planning in the area. • Initiate data compilation for a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. • Collaborate with Dakota County to develop groundwater management strategies to address contamination and sustainability concerns related to surface water ecosystems. • Add approximately 10 new monitoring wells. ","In FY19 DNR staff: • Completed the groundwater availability portion of Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategy (GRAPS) reports for three major watersheds—Hawk Creek Redeye River and the Zumbro River. • Updated and analyzed 65 hydrographs that compare groundwater levels to reported pumping volumes and climate data within nine watersheds for GRAPS. • Compiled 1500 files for inclusion in the Aquifer Properties database. • Provided groundwater technical reviews of 33 water supply plans for communities throughout MN. • Developed a draft monitoring plan for the Red Lake/Polk County area. Groundwater levels will be tracked using a combination of permittee monitoring and DNR network wells. • Evaluated pumping scenarios using an updated groundwater model for the City of Moorhead groundwater expansion from the Buffalo Aquifer. • Compilation of existing data and project scoping has begun for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area groundwater model. • Completed technical report describing construction of the groundwater model for Little Rock Creek area. Preparation of input data for 2014-2018 monitoring has started. • Continued providing technical support and review to the City of Rochester for groundwater modeling and water supply analysis. • Conducted multiple model runs using the North & East Metro Groundwater Model in support of the Ramsey County District Court Order and to investigate potential impacts by large water appropriators outside the 5-mile radius defined by the Court. • Groundwater staff assessed the groundwater level network needs in six counties and three rural communities. No new monitoring wells were added in FY19 (with this funding source). • Preliminary meetings with Dakota county to define modeling objectives were held this past year. Construction of the groundwater model has been on hold pending completion of the revised Geologic Atlas and completion of other groundwater models. ",,,,1080994,158103,,11.4,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2018,1375000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY18 the DNR plans to drill 26 additional groundwater monitoring wells. Also in FY18 DNR staff will: • Finish the Little Rock Creek groundwater model and begin using it to test various management scenarios. • Start developing a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. • Finish developing the Aquifer Properties database and work with the MN Department of Health to enter information currently scattered across numerous state and federal agencies. • Participate in six aquifer tests to guide permit staff who are addressing well interferences and aquifer sustainability issues near the city of Mentor. • Continue responding to requests for technical support from communities that are developing water supply plans. ","In FY18 DNR staff: • Completed the groundwater availability portion of Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategy (GRAPS) reports for five major watersheds—Cannon Missouri Lower St. Croix Watonwan and Sauk. • Finished programming the Aquifer Properties database. • Located and updated 1 400 well site locations in Mille Lacs Steele Cook Pennington and Dakota counties for use in county geologic atlas work by the Minnesota Geological Survey. • Provided groundwater technical reviews of 20 water supply plans for communities throughout MN. • Conducted eight aquifer tests in support of water supply issues including well interferences near Mentor. • Started groundwater modeling for the City of Moorhead groundwater expansion from the Buffalo Aquifer. • Provided technical support and review to the City of Rochester for groundwater modeling and water supply analysis. • Continued input of historical water chemistry data (over 6 000 samples) and streamlined input of new chemistry data into the EquIS database. • Initiated scoping for groundwater modeling in the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area; • Completed the initial groundwater model for Little Rock Creek area. • Completed revisions and updates for the North Metro Lakes Groundwater Model. • No new monitoring wells were added in FY18 (with this funding source) due to limited resources and the high demand for modeling and other technical analyses. ",,,,1405812,151962,,14.2,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2017,1375000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","(e) $1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY17 staff will install 55 additional wells in areas of concern or to fill gaps and replace nonfunctioning wells in the long term statewide network. Staff will also continue enhancing the processing and accessibility of groundwater network data. Enhancements will include streamlining the gathering storage and online accessibility of data for required groundwater monitoring permits in the 11-county metro and outstate areas with high groundwater appropriation volumes. We will continue to provide technical support for communities developing water supply plans. We will also continue to provide training for soil and water conservation district staff in FY16.","In FY17 DNR staff oversaw the drilling of 51 observation wells including new wells and replacement of nonfunctioning wells. This brought the number of active groundwater monitoring locations in the network to 1 035 of which 599 are measured continuously by data loggers. Staff compiled and finalized continuous records for approximately 300 groundwater observation locations. Also in FY17 DNR staff: • Developed a groundwater model for Little Rock Creek incorporating information about surface water/groundwater interactions from newly completed staff analysis of data from six aquifer tests. Staff also began testing the model’s sensitivity and incorporating recommendations from an external technical advisory committee. • Transferred all historical water chemistry data collected by the County Geologic Atlas group into the EQuiS database. • Started developing an Aquifer Properties database. • Created a GIS database to catalog historical well interferences. When complete the database will facilitate access to records about interference complaints technical investigations and resolutions. • Conducted “Groundwater 101” training for several Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs). • Provided technical support on request to communities facing water supply sustainability issues including the City of Rochester and Moorhead Public Service. • Updated the statewide “changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis to include an additional 45 wells (for a new total of 341 wells) over the time period of 1997-2016.",,,,1116062,145513,,11.3,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2016,1375000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","(e) $1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY16 the DNR will install an additional 50 wells in priority areas of concern and continue to refine the process to compile and deliver data. We will do this by adding a web-based input system for data from cooperators (Soil and Water Conservation Districts and Cities) and upgrade the website so the public can access groundwater data. We will continue to work with our partners at the MPCA MDH MDA BWSR MGS and Metropolitan Council to make groundwater data sharable and available between agencies. We will also continue migrating chemistry data from the Geologic Atlas Program to the EQuIS database. We will continue to work with our partners at other Agencies and MN.IT to establish shared data governance standards. We will continue developing groundwater sustainability thresholds. These thresholds will be used to identify problems that could by caused by groundwater pumping for certain lakes rivers and wetlands that depend on groundwater. When completed these thresholds will be used to help us make individual permit decisions about groundwater appropriations. We will finish building a computer model for groundwater in the Little Rock Creek area We will continue to provide technical support for communities developing water supply plans. For example we will work with Moorhead on its analysis of the Buffalo Aquifer and the role it plays in Moorhead’s water supply planning. We will also continue to provide training for soil and water conservation district staff in FY16. We will conduct nine aquifer tests to provide information about regional aquifer information needs and our aquifer test database will become operational in FY16. ","In FY16 DNR staff installed 117 wells instrumented 18 wells with available equipment and processed 196 continuous groundwater well records. Staff also completed the planned integrated data input system allowing cooperators and remotely deployed staff to enter data online. We refined the website making it easier for the public to access data and see recently collected raw data within two days of downloading from network wells. Data processing was also streamlined to provide approved and final data sooner than previous years. DNR staff continued efforts to develop a groundwater model for Little Rock Creek and involved an external technical advisory committee in the process. Staff investigated water supply issues near the City of LaSalle related to cumulative impacts from expanded crop irrigation and reviewed cumulative pumping impacts to the Union Creek watershed. The latter effort helped guide permitting decisions and identify groundwater monitoring sites. DNR staff participated on an interagency water data governance team which developed two proposals to improve data governance and sharing among agencies. DNR with support from MDH MDA MPCA hosted groundwater educational workshops in four areas of the state. These workshops for Soil and Water Conservation District staff were well attended and highly regarded by the attendees.",,,,1545948,144234,,12.8,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2015,1375000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY15 The DNR will continue enhancing its groundwater monitoring network and data management system and decision-making abilities. -We will continue development of Standard Evaluation Procedures that will be used for the establishment of groundwater sustainability thresholds and identifying adverse impacts to groundwater-dependent surface water features. -Observation Well Network Enhancement. The DNR will install approximately 65 new observation wells in areas of the state that are experiencing increasing water use or concerns about water levels including municipal water supplies for small communities. -Observation Well Network Management. We will maintain or seal the current wells in the observation well network which are not currently being used due to poor performance. -Hydrology Data Project. In FY15 chemistry data from the Geologic Atlas Program will be incorporated into the Hydrology Data Domain system to provide greater access to the data for users of the data. Data currently in paper files will be entered into databases. -Ground Water Data Website. A map-based website will be developed to provide easy access to groundwater elevation information and other hydrology data. -We will continue to provide technical support for communities developing water supply plans including the cities of Rochester and Moorhead and others. -We will continue to provide technical analysis of existing information and assessments for Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA): North and East Metro GWMA Straight River GWMA and Bonanza Valley GWMA.","In FY15 the DNR enhanced its groundwater monitoring network and data collection network by installing 165 new groundwater level monitoring wells and equipped 203 wells with devices that record water levels every 15 minutes. We compiled 61 annual continuous water level records across the state. We are working with our agency partners to develop statewide systems for entering managing and sharing water and climate data for Minnesota’s state and local governments that generate and use this data. With Clean Water Funds we developed a new quality assurance process for our groundwater level data and transferred it to a cooperative DNR/MPCA database and we launched a new cooperative groundwater monitoring website which provides access to all available groundwater level data from over 950 DNR- operated observation wells. We worked to develop groundwater sustainability thresholds which will be used to identify problems that could be caused by groundwater pumping for certain lakes rivers and wetlands that depend on groundwater. We also worked with 24 communities to develop or review and approve water supply plans. We provided training for soil and water conservation district staff across Minnesota. This training significantly increased local government’s knowledge and understanding of groundwater and highlighted the need for more resources to manage groundwater at the local level. We conducted eight aquifer tests (focused investigations that help estimate the potential impacts from high capacity pumping from water supply wells) to learn more about regional water sustainability issues. We are also creating an interagency aquifer test database in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Health which uses aquifer tests to evaluate and establish drinking water wellhead protection areas. ",,,,1246904,154895,,10.8,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2014,1375000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY14 DNR will continue to enhance its groundwater monitoring network and data management system. The DNR will begin development of Standard Evaluation Procedures which will be used for the establishment of groundwater sustainability thresholds. -Observation Well Network Enhancement. DNR will install approximately 65 new observation wells in the State. These new wells will be placed in both new locations as well as in existing areas to service under represented areas and to replace damaged or poorly performing wells. Some of the wells are designated as “sentinel monitoring wells” because they provide signals of when groundwater pumping is adversely affecting surface water bodies. -Observation Well Network Assessment and Management. DNR completed the statewide assessment of observation wells and will maintain or seal the current wells in the observation well network which are not currently being used due to poor performance. -Hydrology Data Domain Project. Scoping and initial development will be completed for the Hydrology Data Domain Project. This project will integrate and provide easy access to hydrologic data used in well appropriation decisions and permitting decision-making. Monitoring information will include groundwater elevation data groundwater contamination data surface water data (lakes streams wetlands) climatology data as well as other hydrologic data. Data will include monitoring information from DNR MPCA MDA Met Council and MDH. -Ground Water Data Website. Development will initiated for a map-based Ground Water Data Website which will be designed to provide easy and direct access to groundwater elevation information for all DNR Observation Wells.","In FY14 DNR enhanced its groundwater monitoring network and data collection network by installing 40 new groundwater level monitoring wells equipped with devices that record water levels every 15 minutes. This information is used to evaluate the effect of groundwater pumping on water levels. -The statewide observation well assessment project was completed in FY14. -Groundwater Monitoring Network Enhancement - Completed a monitoring plan with locations for 75 new monitoring wells (outside of the 11-county metro area). -DNR led multi-Agency efforts to conduct “synoptic surveys” to collect water levels in hundreds of domestic water supply wells monitoring wells and lakes for the North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area in the vicinity of White Bear Lake. -Hydrology Data Project. Developed conceptual plan to integrate hydrologic data and provide easy access to data for analysis related to appropriation permit decisions. Monitoring information will include groundwater elevation data groundwater chemistry and contamination data surface water data (lakes streams wetlands) and various climatology data from DNR MPCA MDA Met Council and MDH. -Provided technical support for communities developing water supply plans including the cities of Rochester and Moorhead. -Provided technical analysis of existing information and assessments for Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs): North and East Metro GWMA Straight River GWMA and Bonanza Valley GWMA.",,,,1149106,257141,,12.6,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2013,1500000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1500000 the first year and $1500000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY13 DNR will increase data collection in potential Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs): * Complete geophysical surveys in two potential GWMAs to increase understanding of aquifer characteristics. * DNR with support of other organizations will complete synoptic measurements of groundwater levels in three potential GWMAs. * Work on aquifer models will be initiated for two areas of concern. * DNR will finalize reporting for statewide DNR observation well assessment. Public Communications on Resource Management & Sustainability * DNR will lead or participate in meetings with stakeholders and interagency staff for areas of concern where long-term sustainability of groundwater use is being evaluated. * DNR will assess the feasibility of bringing water supply planning assistance to communities (populations of less than 1000) not previously encouraged nor required to prepare water supply plans. * DNR will move toward designation of two or more groundwater management areas.","In FY13 DNR enhanced its groundwater monitoring network and data collection network by installing 65 new groundwater level monitoring wells equipped with devises which record water levels every 15 minutes. This information is used to evaluate the effect of groundwater pumping on water levels. The statewide observation well assessment project was also completed in FY13. DNR also led multi-Agency efforts to conduct “synoptic surveys ” in which water levels in hundreds of domestic water supply wells monitoring wells and lakes are measured in one day. Synoptic surveys were completed for the North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area and for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. Finally DNR completed groundwater models in the Straight River and Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Areas. The models evaluated options for perimeter boundaries for the Straight River and Bonanza Valley areas. Geological cross sections needed for three-dimensional mapping was also done for portions of the Straight River and Bonanza Valley areas. DNR also participated on the technical advisory committee for the development of the Metro Model 3 a groundwater-flow model of the greater Twin Cities Metropolitan Area.",,,,854617,140787,,10.0,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2012,1500000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1500000 the first year and $1500000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY12 DNR will participate in or lead meetings with stakeholders and interagency staff in four groundwater management areas. Staff will also: * prepare paper files for data mining: review sort and scan 10 linear feet of hard copy files from ethanol projects and groundwater areas of interest to electronic format; * achieve significant progress with data-mining and work planning on six of the ranked groundwater management areas; and * assess the feasibility of bringing water supply planning assistance to communities not previously encouraged nor required to prepare water supply plans.","In FY12 DNR led and participated in stakeholder meetings with interagency staff cities counties and local organizations to evaluate and advance the concept of groundwater management areas (GWMA) in seven resource critical areas of the state. Based on DNR’s technical review of the groundwater/surface water resources and current and future use two areas were identified for potential designation by the Commissioner of the DNR as groundwater management areas. DNR worked with agency partners to finalize locations for 10 new observation well nests (2 wells in each nest) in three potential groundwater management areas. Additionally DNR instrumented over 100 observation wells in geographic areas of concern with state-of-the-art data loggers for continuous water level monitoring. To get more and better information about groundwater in three areas of concern the DNR along with many partner organizations completed an intensive effort to measure groundwater levels in over 400 wells and over 80 lake levels within a span of 9 days. Data mining was completed for groundwater areas of concern. DNR reviewed sorted and scanned over 10 linear feet of hard copy files from ethanol projects and groundwater areas of concern to electronic format.",,,,715316,239944,,7.0,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2011,525000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$600000 the first year and $525000 the second year are for drinking water planning and protection activities.","In FY11 DNR will work with other agencies to complete a statewide interagency review and ranking process for areas of critical groundwater use.","In FY11 DNR completed a statewide interagency review and ranking process for areas of critical groundwater use and participated in the Interagency Groundwater and Drinking Water Team’s assessment of a statewide process to evaluate risks to the water table aquifer. Scientists also created an updated statewide map of shallow aquifer vulnerability. Staff conducted meetings with interested parties and interagency staff in three potential groundwater management areas (South Washington County White Bear Lake and Little Rock Creek) and continued less formal discussions with user groups and local governmental units in two other potential groundwater management areas in Clay and Hubbard Counties.",,,,687305,32400,,5.0,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2010,600000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$600000 the first year and $525000 the second year are for drinking water planning and protection activities.","In FY10 DNR will complete a statewide assessment to identify areas with existing and potential water supply issues. Staff will also define the scope of work for studies and monitoring for 20 communities with existing or potential water supply issues and work with stakeholder groups on the development of aquifer management plans in two pilot areas.","In FY10 DNR worked with agency partners to assess and rank areas with potential water supply issues. The team chose 20 areas (8 non-metro and 12 metro) for trial evaluation of level of effort needed to establish a groundwater management area and collect adequate data to develop aquifer management plans and completed scoping process for the 8 non-metro areas. Staff conducted significant monitoring and held stakeholder meetings to lay the groundwork for aquifer management plans in two pilot areas: Moorhead and Bonanza Valley (Brooten-Belgrade area).",,,,228781,13785,,,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,,
34205,"Becker Park Infiltration Project",2016,725000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project addresses phosphorus in urban runoff by reducing the volume of runoff discharging downstream to the impaired lakes. HydroCAD and P8 were used to estimate an annual load reduction of 118 lbs/year of phosphorus and 38,400 lbs/TSS, as well as an annual volume reduction of 108 acre-feet per year. The reduction of the TMDL-required Upper Twin Lake total phosphorus reduction is 16% of the TMDL-required Upper Twin Lake TP reduction of 741 lbs/year. ","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 118 lbs of phosphorus and 19.2 tons of sediment.","achieved proposed outcomes",1433500,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",725000,,,,"Shingle Creek WMC","Local/Regional Government","Installation of a 43,000 sf infiltration gallery in Becker Park in the City of Crystal to infiltrate 0.5 inches of runoff from a 147 acre currently untreated mixed use subwatershed with 51% impervious surface. The project will reduce total phosphorus to Impaired Water Upper Twin Lake by 118 pounds annually, and reduce street flooding on Bass Lake Road (Hennepin County Road 10). ",,,2016-01-22,2019-12-23,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Diane,Spector,"Shingle Creek WMC","3235 Fernbrook Lane","Maple Plain; Plymouth",MN,55447,763-479-4280,dspector@wenck.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Hennepin,,"Mississippi River - Twin Cities",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/becker-park-infiltration-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
34225,"Becker County Targeted Phosphorus Reduction and Lake Protection Project ",2016,254897,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Area health coordinator","By completing the project as proposed, this grant has resulted in an estimated reduction of 160 tons of soil loss annually, cut yearly TSS levels by 73 tons, and prevent 176 tons of phosphorus from reaching the targeted water bodies.","Achieved proposed outcomes",62500,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",250000,301,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.99,"Becker SWCD","Local/Regional Government","With over 500 public water lakes in Becker County, we are blessed with abundant and diverse lake resources that, like those of much of lake country, are at risk of degradation due to increasing development pressures, redevelopment of non-conforming lots, rising stormwater runoff and land use changes within their watersheds. The Becker County Targeted Phosphorus Reduction and Lake Protection Project seeks to address the critical sources of nutrients and sediment reaching 29 lakes that have been determined to have a high sensitivity to phosphorus through the targeted application of applicable, lake-friendly Best Management Practices. By targeting high quality, unimpaired lakes at greatest risk of becoming impaired and working to restore waters closest to meeting state water quality standards, this project aligns with the State of Minnesota's non-point priority funding plan as well as numerous objectives and goals within the Becker County Local Water Plan and related implementation schedule.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Peter,Mead,"Becker SWCD",,,,,218-846-7360,pemead@co.becker.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Becker,,"Buffalo River, Crow Wing River, Otter Tail River, Wild Rice River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/becker-county-targeted-phosphorus-reduction-and-lake-protection-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34224,"Beltrami SWCD Stormwater Community Partners Grant Program",2016,150000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Community Partners 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in the removal of approximately 20 pounds of phosphorous and 30 tons of sediment per year. ","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 70.056 lbs of phosphorus, 803 tons of sediment, and 2.1606 acre-feet per year of water volume.","achieved proposed outcomes",37500,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",150000,4,,0.9,"Beltrami SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Beltrami SWCD proposes to partner with citizen and non-profit groups to complete projects that will reduce stormwater runoff and retain water on the land. The majority of the projects will be in the Lake Bemidji lakeshed which has recently been identified in the WRAPs project as being on the verge of impaired for nutrients. With the City of Bemidji being a regional hub for Northwestern Minnesota and the First City on the Mississippi, there are ample opportunities for citizen involvement and ample opportunities for stormwater improvements. This project is also anticipated to raise awareness and educate the citizens of Beltrami County and the Greater Bemidji Area in regards to stormwater treatment and the impacts that citizens can have on our most valued resources by showcasing these projects once completed. The SWCD will implement a grant program and provide competitive grants to an anticipated 6 citizen groups. These groups will undoubtedly leverage the creativity of their group to apply for the grant funds to implement the most cost-effective projects that will have the biggest impact on stormwater reduction, treatment, and inflitration. The SWCD will work with all of our partners in the County in any of the 7 major watersheds but we anticipate that the majority of the projects will be completed within the Mississippi River Headwaters Watershed (where the majority of the population resides). Examples of anticipated projects include rain gardens, stormwater reuse projects, stormwater treatment and infiltration projects, reducing impervious surfaces, shoreline buffers, and any other projects that can demonstrate a water quality benefit by reducing impacts from stormwater. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-04-09,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Brent,Rud,"Beltrami SWCD","701 Minnesota Ave NW Ste 113",Bemidji,MN,56601,218-333-4159,brent.rud@co.beltrami.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Beltrami,,"Clearwater River, Leech Lake River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Upper/Lower Red Lake",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/beltrami-swcd-stormwater-community-partners-grant-program,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
34302,"Big Fork Watershed - Civic Engagement and Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Support",2016,15365,,,,,,,,,,,.15,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","""This project will meet the following goals: develop, implement, and evaluate the impacts civic engagement outcomes for the Big Fork River Watershed; create a citizen understanding of the Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) process and the role citizens and stakeholders can play in attaining water quality restoration and protection; provide opportunities for citizens and stakeholders to assist local partners and state agencies in developing priorities for restoration as well projects to accomplish protection of high quality waters; and ensure that all technical and planning documents will be reviewed and commented on by Soil and Water Conservation District staff.""",,"Big Fork River Watershed ",2016-05-15,2017-08-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,,,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","1889 East Highway 2","Grand Rapids",MN,55744,"(218) 326-0017",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Itasca, Koochiching",,"Big Fork River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/big-fork-watershed-civic-engagement-and-watershed-restoration-protection-strategy-wraps-sup,,,,
33409,"Big Lake",2016,551264,"MS Section 446A.073","Point Source Implementation Grant Program","Reduce wastewater phosphorus discharge to 1 mg/L or less","Reduce wastewater phosphorus discharge to 1 mg/L or less",,596350,City,,,,,"Big Lake, City of","Local/Regional Government","Construct wastewater treatment improvements to meet more stingent discharge requirements",,,2015-07-23,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jeff,Freeman,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority","332 Minnesota Street, Suite W820","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 259-7465",jeff.freeman@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority ",,Sherburne,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/big-lake,,,,
34215,"Big Trout High Quality Lake: County Road 66 Stormwater Project",2016,310000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","A 1% reduction in sediment is anticipated.","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 60 tons of sediment.","Achieved proposed outcomes",15250,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",61000,696,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.29,"Crow Wing SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Crow Wing Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) proposes to complete stormwater best management practices (BMPs) that will reduce 40 pounds of phosphorus and 40 tons of sediment per year from entering Big Trout Lake. The Crow Wing County (CWC) Water Plan identifies Big Trout Lake as a priority lake to enhance due to its significant decline in water clarity and high ratio of impervious surface surrounding the lake. The 2015 CWC Assessors Property Tax Assessment reports that Big Trout has the second highest taxable land value in CWC at $4,200 per foot of shoreline. This demonstrates how significant the lake is to the local community and CWC. In order to ensure Big Trout Lakeshore property retains its value, this project will implement a targeted and high priority stormwater project based off the University of Minnesota Central Regional Sustainable Development Partnership (CRSDP) study. This study consisted of stormwater product design research, landuse cover data, public meetings, engineering, and survey design work. The SWCD will utilize the draft engineered plan to solve a 30 year County Road 66 (CTY RD) stormwater problem which currently contributes 50 pounds of phosphorus per year to Big Trout Lake. To mitigate the runoff, the SWCD will partner with the CWC Highway (HWY) Department, City of Manhattan Beach, Whitefish Area Property Owners Association (WAPOA) to install three Downstream Defenders and a series of underground pipes. This targeted approach reflects the lessons learned from SWCD's Deerwood Stormwater Project; which included extensive community outreach, use of media resources, site preparation and design components, communication and oversight of contractors, site inspections, proper maintenance, and project evaluation. The SWCD believes that if stormwater runoff problems are not addressed within Big Trout that water clarity will continue to decline, negatively altering the quality of life and economic vitality of Manhattan Beach and CWC.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Melissa,Barrick,"Crow Wing SWCD","322 Laurel Street, Suite 13",Brainerd,MN,56401,218-828-6197,melissa.barrick@crowwingswcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Crow Wing",,"Pine River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/big-trout-high-quality-lake-county-road-66-stormwater-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34238,"Birch Lake Stormwater Retrofits",2016,70005,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Phosphorus is the primary pollutant of concern, and the current phosphorus loading capacity of 267 lbs/yr is equal to the current phosphorus budget. Therefore, no increase from current phosphorus loading levels is allowable, and the current TMDL prescribes a 26 lb/year reduction as a margin of safety. This project proposes to reduce the load from a highly impervious area that slopes directly into the lake from 11 lbs/yr to 3 lbs/yr. ","This project resulted in an estimated reduction of 8 lb. of phosphorus per year",,17501,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",70005,54,"Members for Sherburne SWCD are: Douglas Hipsag, Jason Selvog, Jason Selvog, Jason Selvog, Larry Goenner, Roger Nelson, Shane Berg",0.03,"Sherburne SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The funds requested will provide Big Lake Township with the technical and financial assistance necessary to retrofit up to six locations for stormwater treatment practices within the direct drainage area of Birch Lake, an impaired water body which is very close to meeting state standards. The projects have been identified as high priority in several water quality plans including a TMDL, a subwatershed assessment, the County Water Plan and the Mississippi River (St. Cloud) WRAPS. Five retrofit locations are planned along 224th avenue, this road currently collects runoff from surrounding properties and directly drains into the lake. Projects to be implemented on 224th avenue include modification of township right of ways to increase their capacity to hold and infiltrate water as well as the reshaping of the road to divert water into infiltration trenches. One retrofit project will be located at the township boat landing located on 159th street. The boat landing will be modified to capture and treat stormwater. Should additional funds remain after the township projects are implemented, the SWCD will contact residential land owners to inquire about implementation of additional stormwater reduction projects which are also identified in existing plans.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Francine,Larson,"Sherburne SWCD","14855 Hwy 10","Elk River",MN,55330,"763-241-1170 x 131",flarson@sherburneswcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Sherburne,,"Mississippi River - St. Cloud",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/birch-lake-stormwater-retrofits,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34204,"Ag BMP Soluble P Reduction",2016,160000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7 ","This project will reduce phosphorus discharges to the St. Croix by enhancing the soluble phosphorus removal capacity of targeted agricultural stormwater best management practices prioritized in the 2013 Top 50P! Rural Subwatershed Analysis. Using urban stormwater technologies such as infiltration, iron sand filters and aluminum-based water treatment residuals, at least four agricultural stormwater practices will reduce phosphorus discharges by at least 50 lb/year. ","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 93.3 lbs of phosphorus and 58.8 tons of sediment.","achieved proposed outcomes",41667,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS ",160000,4,,0.34,"Washington Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","In recent years, nutrient enrichment has occurred in Lake St. Croix due to increasing amounts of phosphorus entering the lake from the watershed. According to the TMDL, approximately half of the phosphorus-loading to Lake St. Croix is in the soluble form, and agriculture has been identified as one of the largest contributors of that phosphorus. In addition to the TMDL, subwatershed analyses were completed to identify, assess, and prioritize phosphorus-reducing practices in rural areas draining to Lake St. Croix in Washington County. This project will reduce phosphorus discharges to the St. Croix by enhancing the soluble phosphorus removal capacity of targeted agricultural stormwater best management practices prioritized in the 2013 Top 50P! Rural Subwatershed Analysis and the 2014 St. Croix LCCMR Prioritization Rural Subwatershed Analysis. Using urban stormwater technologies such as infiltration, iron sand filters, and aluminum-based water treatment residuals, at least four targeted agricultural stormwater practices will reduce phosphorus discharges by least 50 lb/year. This project will enhance the function of traditional agricultural stormwater BMPs to further reduce phosphorus within the same footprint of an existing or newly constructed agricultural BMP. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-03-23,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tara,Kelly,"Washington Conservation District",,,,,"651-330-8220 x43",tkelly@mnwcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Washington,,"Lower St. Croix River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/ag-bmp-soluble-p-reduction,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
33821,"Buffalo Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Comment Response",2016,4953,,,,,,,,,,,0.02,"Houston Engineering","For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to address public comments on the public noticed draft Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) study and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) report for the watershed, and to produce a final draft WRAPS study and TMDL report ready for final approval by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). ",,"Buffalo River Watershed",2016-03-10,2016-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Timothy,James,"MPCA Detroit Lakes Office","714 Lake Street, Suite 220","Detroit Lakes",MN,56501,"(218) 846-8103",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Becker, Clay, Otter Tail, Wilkin",,"Buffalo River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffalo-watershed-restoration-protection-strategy-wraps-comment-response,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2025,25000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(h)","$25,000 the first year and $25,000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. ","In FY25 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. The DNR will review the buffer map web applications for platform modernization and alignment, assess workflow process improvements, in preparation for a future customer service buffer map improvement project. ",,,,,,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2024,25000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(h)","$25,000 the first year and $25,000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. "," In FY24 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. The DNR will review the buffer map web applications for platform modernization and alignment, assess workflow process improvements, in preparation for a customer service buffer map improvement project. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY24 with passage of the public water inventory legislation). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,14111,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2023,25000,,"$25000 the first year and $25000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. ","In FY23 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. The DNR will review the buffer map web applications for platform modernization and alignment, assess workflow process improvements, in preparation for a customer service buffer map improvement project. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY23). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2022,25000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(h)","$25000 the first year and $25000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. ","In FY22 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY22). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,12264,2965,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2021,100000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website.","In FY21 the DNR will publish another updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners' behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map updates were identified in FY21). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners' behalf. ",,,,2731,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2020,100000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website.","In FY20 the DNR will publish another updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review."," Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY20). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,50710,,,0.4,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2019,100000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on buffer map interpretation to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","In FY19 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). Finally the DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review and buffer implementation for farmed-through locations.","The DNR published an updated buffer map in August 2018. Local government change requests and the DNR’s review of special situations resulted in 160 map changes. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations.",,,,59971,11044,,0.5,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2018,100000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on buffer map interpretation to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","The DNR will publish an updated buffer map in August 2017. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will make requested changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). Finally the DNR will work with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decisions on the buffer map comment review and buffer implementation for “farmed through” locations.","The DNR published an updated buffer map in August 2017. Local government change requests and the DNR’s review of special situations resulted in 212 corrections to the map. The DNR worked with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to develop and implement a consistent systematic framework for review of buffer map comments and buffer implementation for farmed-through public waters watercourses. The map was updated for Marshall County in June 2018 to correct public ditch location errors. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf.",,,,74821,11283,,0.5,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2017,325000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","(i) $325000 the first year and $325000 the second year are for analysis and mapping in each county related to compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements and to provide statewide coordination and guidance to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","In FY17 the DNR will publish updated versions of the buffer map in November and February. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will make requested changes that are consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). Finally DNR field staff will conduct detailed reviews of special situations where public watercourses were previously relocated placed in drain tile or farmed through. Several hundred of these situations were identified by landowners and local government staff in FY16 and the DNR anticipates many more being identified as local reviews of the map continue. The DNR’s review of these special situations may result in removing the state buffer requirement from the map in some of these areas.","The DNR published updated versions of the buffer map in November 2016 February 2017 and May 2017. The map was updated in May to reflect a significant change in the underlying public waters data. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically-specific comments on behalf of landowners. The buffer map review application was updated to provide the decision and rationale for every change request received whether accepted for a map change or not. DNR field staff conducted over 600 detailed reviews of special situations where public watercourses were previously relocated placed in drain tile or farmed through. The local government staff change requests and the DNR’s review of special situations resulted in 1 380 corrections to the map. ",,,,287518,34357,,1.2,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
31585,"Buffer Mapping",2016,325000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","(i) $325000 the first year and $325000 the second year are for analysis and mapping in each county related to compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements and to provide statewide coordination and guidance to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","In FY16 the DNR will make significant progress in developing buffer protection maps that describe where buffers are legally required on water bodies in Minnesota. We will set criteria for which waters will be included on the buffer protection map according to the requirements in the 2015 buffer law (M.L. 2015 SP1 Ch.4 Art. 4) and 2016 amendments (M.L. 2016 Ch. 85). The map will be developed in partnership with counties cities watershed districts soil and water conservation districts and other drainage authorities. We will create a map viewer that shows existing public waters inventory and DNR-assigned shoreland classifications on the map and make an initial map available online. See http://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/gis/buffersviewer/. The DNR will coordinate with drainage authorities to incorporate local information about public drainage ditches into the buffer protection map. We will make the draft buffer protection map available for review and comments through local governments which will work with us to ensure accuracy and designations on the final map. We will complete the map in summer 2016 and provide updates in fall 2016 and winter 2017. ","In FY16 the DNR developed buffer map criteria and created a preliminary map showing buffer requirements for all 87 counties. The map was based on DNR public waters inventory and shoreland classification data and public ditch data provided by over 90 drainage authorities. The DNR developed an interactive web-based map viewer (see http://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/gis/buffersviewer/) that allows local government staff to review the map and enter geographically specific comments. Local government staff reviewed the preliminary map and made 2603 comments resulting in 1450 map corrections. The total number of riparian buffers mapped is 145 113 including over 106 000 miles of public watercourses and public ditches and nearly 39 000 miles of lake and wetland shorelines. The map was published on July 12 2016. ",,,,284299,33759,,1.0,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,,
34227,"Campus Groundwater Conservation Planning Initiative",2016,200000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in the development of a systematic approach to identify and rank groundwater conservation BMPs in terms of cost-effectiveness. ","Work was completed as per the approved work plan, and included Metro Conservation Districts (MCD) established a task force to research existing protocols, water conservation and reuse best management practices, and calculators that could estimate water use savings, and subsequent water quality benefits, from the implementation of Best Management Practice (BMP). The task force developed water use protocols and an audit process for large public campuses to identify and prioritize water conservation, water efficiency, and runoff infiltration and reuse BMP opportunities, estimate the cost-benefit and water quality benefits to implement identified BMPs. MCD trained member staff on the protocol and audit process and conducted water use audits and developed groundwater conservation plans for 21 public campuses across the 11-county twin cities metro area. MCD also provided training to facilities managers for each campus on implementation of recommended BMPs. ","achieved proposed outcomes",46293,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",185173,8053,"Members for Area 4 - Metropolitan SWCDs Technical Service Area are: Doug Schoenecker, Gary Hartmann, James Fitzsimmons, Linda Brown, Robert Casey",3.19,"Area 4 - Metropolitan SWCDs Technical Service Area","Local/Regional Government","Once thought to have an essentially inexhaustible groundwater supply, Minnesotans are now realizing our rates of use are regionally unsustainable. Recent advanced modeling by the MN DNR and Metropolitan Council of aquifer supplies, in conjunction with predicted demand, indicate the major metropolitan area aquifers are currently subject to extraction rates that exceed recharge. Simply stated, we are mining our groundwater. In addition to supply concerns, several surface waters within the metro area, most notably White Bear Lake, are experiencing impacts due to reduced aquifer levels associated with excessive groundwater extraction. Sustainable groundwater strategies will need to influence both the supply and use side of the water budget. Supply can be increased through efforts that infiltrate precipitation into the soil; use can be decreased by implementing efficiencies, and the use of alternative water sources. The Metro Conservation Districts (MCD) propose to provide groundwater conservation planning protocols to member districts for implementation on large-acreage, public campuses (e.g. public schools, hospitals, and government facilities). These areas are targeted due to their educational benefits, likelihood of stakeholder buy in and implementation, magnitude of potential impact, and opportunity for school district-wide implementation. This project will provide and apply a systematic approach to identify and rank groundwater conservation BMPs in terms of cost-effectiveness. Similar to the statewide benefits provided through the stormwater retrofit analysis process, MCD is confident this protocol will expand to all areas of the state, thereby ultimately providing long-lasting, far-reaching groundwater conservation efforts. Because this ranking stems from a thorough understanding of both the benefits of a project and the associated costs, the findings will inform and facilitate adoption of new groundwater conservation standards by regulatory entities. ",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Troy,Kuphal,"Area 4 - Metropolitan SWCDs Technical Service Area","7151 190th St W Ste 125",Jordan,MN,55352,952-492-5425,tkuphal@co.scott.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Scott,,"Cannon River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, North Fork Crow River, Rum River, South Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/campus-groundwater-conservation-planning-initiative,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Annie Felix-Gerth",
29756,"Cannon River Watershed HSPF Model Phase II and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study",2015,154020,,,,,,,,,,,0.73,LimnoTech,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to apply the Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) model to evaluate scenarios to support potential management actions and implementation in the watershed, construct Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies, and to develop a conceptual site model of the lakes for understanding phosphorus release.",,"Cannon River Watershed",2015-04-16,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Justin,Watkins,"MPCA Rochester Office","18 Wood Lake Drive SE",Rochester,MN,55904,"(507) 206-2621",,"Modeling, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Dakota, Goodhue, Le Sueur, Rice, Steele",,"Cannon River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/cannon-river-watershed-hspf-model-phase-ii-and-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-study,,,,
29756,"Cannon River Watershed HSPF Model Phase II and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study",2016,6915,,,,,,,,,,,.06,LimnoTech,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to apply the Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) model to evaluate scenarios to support potential management actions and implementation in the watershed, construct Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies, and to develop a conceptual site model of the lakes for understanding phosphorus release.",,"Cannon River Watershed",2015-04-16,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Justin,Watkins,"MPCA Rochester Office","18 Wood Lake Drive SE",Rochester,MN,55904,"(507) 206-2621",,"Modeling, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Dakota, Goodhue, Le Sueur, Rice, Steele",,"Cannon River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/cannon-river-watershed-hspf-model-phase-ii-and-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-study,,,,
33822,"Carlton Soil and Water Conservation District Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG): Kettle River Watershed Lake & Stream Sampling",2016,24340,,,,,,,,,,,0.16,"Carlton County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","Carlton County Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) and local volunteers will lead an effort to collect total phosphorus, chlorophyll-A, hardness, chloride and secchi disc transparency data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Surface Water Assessment Grant project on the following 10 lakes: Twentynine, Bob, Bear, Little Hanging Horn, Hanging Horn, Moose, Echo, Coffee, Kettle and Merwin. ",,"Kettle River Watershed ",2016-03-02,2018-01-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Melanie,Bomier,"Carlton County Soil and Water Conservation District","PO Box 29 115 Fifth Street South",Carlton,MN,55718,"(218) 384-3891",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Carlton,,"Kettle River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/carlton-soil-and-water-conservation-district-surface-water-assessment-grant-swag-kettle-riv,,,,
34201,"CD-96-21-16 Gully Control and Buffer Implementation",2016,196500,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The estimated annual reduction in sediment is 2428 tons/year and phosphorus is 2646 lbs/year. ","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 1,363 pounds of Phosphorus and 910 tons of Sediment from entering the Red Lake River through the installation of 43 grade stabilization structures and 1.25 miles of buffer. ","Achieved some proposed outcomes",69440,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",179378,11415,"Members for Pennington SWCD are: Brenda Szymanski, Grant Nelson, Greg Hilgeman, Linda Hanson, Ricky Peterson",0.58,"Pennington SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Pennington SWCD has collaborated with Pennington County for several years to identify priority County Ditch reaches that are in need of buffers and grade stabilization structures. This cooperative effort has resulted in the reduction of nutrient and sediment delivery to the Red Lake River Watershed. Pennington SWCD has recently inventoried buffer and grade stabilization needs on three different County Ditch systems: 96, 21 and 16. A total of 23 miles of ditch has been inventoried, 15 miles of buffer are needed along with 81 grade stabilization structures. The installation of these conservation practices will result in the reduction of 2428 tons of sediment per year entering the Red Lake River near St. Hilaire. Near this location, the Red Lake River becomes impaired for Turbidity. The Pennington SWCD also has a long history of working with NRCS, the Red Lake Watershed District and landowners to implement grade stabilization structures throughout the county. With the inventory of needs already complete, these practices can be readily installed with the interest of landowners that receive incentives to assist in the reduction of sediment entering the Red Lake River. ",,"The Pennington SWCD has collaborated with Pennington County for several years to identify priority County Ditch reaches that are in need of buffers and grade stabilization structures. This cooperative effort has resulted in the reduction of nutrient and sediment delivery to the Red Lake River Watershed. Pennington SWCD has recently inventoried buffer and grade stabilization needs on three different County Ditch systems: 96, 21 and 16. A total of 23 miles of ditch has been inventoried, 15 miles of buffer are needed along with 81 grade stabilization structures. The installation of these conservation practices will result in the reduction of 2428 tons of sediment per year entering the Red Lake River near St. Hilaire. Near this location, the Red Lake River becomes impaired for Turbidity. The Pennington SWCD also has a long history of working with NRCS, the Red Lake Watershed District and landowners to implement grade stabilization structures throughout the county. With the inventory of needs already complete, these practices can be readily installed with the interest of landowners that receive incentives to assist in the reduction of sediment entering the Red Lake River. ",2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Bryan,Malone,"Pennington SWCD","201 Sherwood Ave S","Thief River Falls",MN,56701,218-683-7075,bryan.malone@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Pennington,,"Red Lake River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/cd-96-21-16-gully-control-and-buffer-implementation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board ","Annie Felix-Gerth",
34249,"Cedar River Capitol Improvement Plan Implementation",2016,598000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The Cedar River is impaired for turbidity. This project will trap sediment, reduce flashy runoff, and deliver treated water to the impaired waters, and result in an estimated reduction of 338 tons of sediment per year and 168 lbs of phosphorus per year.","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 276 lbs of phosphorus, 182 tons of sediment, and 132 tons per year of soil loss.","achieved proposed outcomes",186875,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",598000,183,,,"Cedar River WD","Local/Regional Government","The Cedar River Watershed District was established in 2007 to identify and fix the water quality impairments in the Cedar River. After several years of monitoring and modeling, the district has developed the requisite background data to drill down on the 25 most crucial areas for targeted treatment. In 2015, a Capitol Improvement Plan was developed to prioritize and rank the most critical projects within the priority list. The District is requesting Clean Water Funding to implement the highest ranking projects, which are shovel ready for timely construction. These ravines provide more treatment potential than any other along the entire Cedar River. The prioritized location of the River is in a stretch of the Cedar River which is very close to reaching the State water quality standard. The landowners upstream have already been implementing practices to reduce runoff. These two capital projects represent the finish line in water treatment in their respective sub watersheds. The targeted approach significantly reduces pollutant loading. State water quality standards on this stretch of the Cedar River are attainable. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-06-12,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Justin,Hanson,"Cedar River WD","1408 21st Ave NW Ste 2",Austin,MN,55912,507-434-2603,justin.hanson@mowerswcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Mower,,"Cedar River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/cedar-river-capitol-improvement-plan-implementation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
34247,"Chain of Lakes Targeted Reduction ",2016,95500,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The 2014 HSPF modeling reduction scenarios determined that by placing a 50 foot high quality grass buffer immediately adjacent to surface waters in priority areas would produce a 68% phosphorus removal rate, or an estimated reduction of 6 tons of sediment per year and 20 lbs of phosphorus per year. ","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 911 pounds of Phosphorus and 1,016 tons of Sediment. ","achieved some of the proposed outcomes",109015,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",95500,2135,"Members for Sauk River WD are: Duane Willenbring, Gary Barber, Gene Rasmusen, Jason Scherping, Larry Kuseske, Lee Bautch, Tim Hagemeier, Tyler Carlson",0.15,"Sauk River WD","Local/Regional Government","The Chain of Lakes Targeted Reduction project will utilize Clean Water Funds to address bank erosion and install vegetated buffers along tributaries to the Eden Valley Chain of Lakes using the SRWD's incentivized Hayed Buffer Program. The Eden Valley Chain of Lakes (Vails Lake, Eden Lake and North Browns Lake) drain into the main segment of the Sauk River Chain of Lakes (SRCL) from the south. Impaired for excessive nutrients, this southern series of lakes is influenced by inflows from private ditches and perennial and intermittent streams. The 2014 TMDL study for the entire SRCL identifies 85-90% of the total phosphorus loading from agricultural runoff. The SRWD will be working with the Stearns County SWCD, Meeker County SWCD, Stearns County NRCS and Pheasants Forever to address the nutrient runoff concerns identified for these three lakes in the 2014 SRCL TMDL. The SRWD's Hayed Buffer Program and stream stabilization will complement conservation BMPs administered by the Stearns County SWCD as part of the Mississippi River Basin Initiative (MRBI) program focused in the lower Sauk River Chain of Lakes region. CWF will be utilized to conduct landowner outreach efforts, technical assistance for project design, and cost share for riparian BMP implementation. Funds will also be utilized as a sign up incentive in the amount of $100/ac to enroll in the SRWD Hayed Buffer Program established by the SRWD's Farmer-led Council. CWF funds will be used to make progress in achieving goals outlined in the District's 2014-2023 plan which includes three miles of priority site specific bank stabilization on Luxemburg Creek for overall annual sediment reduction of six tons. Estimated phosphorus reduction of 20 pounds per year is anticipated from native buffers and stream bank restoration.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Lynn,Nelson,"Sauk River WD","524 4th St","Sauk Centre",MN,56378,320-352-2231,lynn@srwdmn.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Stearns,,"Sauk River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/chain-lakes-targeted-reduction,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Annie Felix-Gerth",No
34297,"Chippewa River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network",2016,100429,,,,,,,,,,,0.32,"Chippewa River Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","The Chippewa River Watershed Project (CRWP) will work with the Minnesot Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to conduct watershed pollutant load monitoring at four sites in the Chippewa River watershed and one site in the neighboring Pomme de Terre River watershed to aid the MPCA in measuring and comparing regional differences and long-term trends in water quality. Our goal is to collect quality data and complete load calculations for five sites using the MPCA's Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) established protocols.",,"Chippewa River Watershed ",2016-01-15,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Klyene,Olson,"Chippewa River Watershed Project","629 North 11th Street ",Montevideo,MN,56265,"(320) 321-1717",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Chippewa, Stevens, Swift",,"Chippewa River, Pomme de Terre River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/chippewa-river-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network,,,,
34297,"Chippewa River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network",2018,40197,,,,,,,,,,,.32,"Chippewa River Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","The Chippewa River Watershed Project (CRWP) will work with the Minnesot Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to conduct watershed pollutant load monitoring at four sites in the Chippewa River watershed and one site in the neighboring Pomme de Terre River watershed to aid the MPCA in measuring and comparing regional differences and long-term trends in water quality. Our goal is to collect quality data and complete load calculations for five sites using the MPCA's Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) established protocols.",,"Chippewa River Watershed ",2016-01-15,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Klyene,Olson,"Chippewa River Watershed Project","629 North 11th Street ",Montevideo,MN,56265,"(320) 321-1717",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Chippewa, Stevens, Swift",,"Chippewa River, Pomme de Terre River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/chippewa-river-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network,,,,
34297,"Chippewa River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network",2019,28066,,,,,,,,,,,.32,"Chippewa River Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","The Chippewa River Watershed Project (CRWP) will work with the Minnesot Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to conduct watershed pollutant load monitoring at four sites in the Chippewa River watershed and one site in the neighboring Pomme de Terre River watershed to aid the MPCA in measuring and comparing regional differences and long-term trends in water quality. Our goal is to collect quality data and complete load calculations for five sites using the MPCA's Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) established protocols.",,"Chippewa River Watershed ",2016-01-15,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Klyene,Olson,"Chippewa River Watershed Project","629 North 11th Street ",Montevideo,MN,56265,"(320) 321-1717",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Chippewa, Stevens, Swift",,"Chippewa River, Pomme de Terre River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/chippewa-river-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network,,,,
34257,"City of Thief River Falls Stormwater Assessment",2016,212000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Proposed measurable outcomes TBD","Technical Trainings to date include: - Soil Erosion Prediction Tools - Comprehensive Nutrient Management and Planning - Basic Surveying - Soil Mechanics - Basic Hydrology - Basic Conservation Planning - Forest Inventory Basics Total Students = 584 Total Contact Hours (students x training duration) = 5,594 The Technical Training and Certification Program increased the number and availability of technical trainers and has dedicated staff to developing training curriculum, delivering training, and serving as mentors to accelerate credential acquisition. ","Achieved proposed outcomes",,,,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",,"Pennington SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Sediment and water quality issues are local priorities within the Thief River and Red Lake River watersheds, which have their confluence in the city of Thief River Falls. The 1W1P effort underway in the Red Lake River Watershed will identify opportunities for projects and practices that are targeted and result in measurable water quality benefits throughout the watershed using PTMApp. However, municipalities, like Thief River Falls, lack the resources to develop data on information to target practices which are cost-effective and efficient for improving water quality in a manner similar to PTMApp, leaving most of the emphasis placed on rural landscapes. This project will develop a P8 water quality model for the city of Thief River Falls to target locations for projects and practices that are both cost-effective and efficient at delivering measurable water quality benefits. The resulting data and information will be used for education and outreach with residents of Thief River Falls, and as a tool for accelerating the implementation of conservation projects and practices within Thief River Falls.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Peter,Nelson,"Pennington SWCD","201 Sherwood Ave S","Thief River Falls",MN,56701,218-683-7075,peter.nelson@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Pennington,,"Red Lake River, Thief River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/city-thief-river-falls-stormwater-assessment,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2022,205436,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3 (amended in M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3)","M.L. 2017 (e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ",,,,,,200398,5038,,,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2021,259586,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3 (amended in M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3)","(e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023. ",,,,,,254278,5308,,,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2020,609694,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3 (amended in M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3)","(e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023. ",,,,,,589212,20482,,,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2019,622885,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017 (e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","The following measures are tracked for the Clean Water Research Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of research projects supported Amount of funding requested in research contracts Number of different organizations that acess Clean Water Fund dollars ",,,,,602230,20655,,1.2,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2018,894991,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M. L. 2017: (e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ",,"Supported 35 research projects (5 active projects, 30 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 10 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. Below are examples of funding secured based on initial results and technology supported by Clean Water research projects: FY Project $ 10-11 EPA 319 45,600   MnDRIVE (Discovery Research and InnoVation Economy) 43,000   Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program 1,600 12-13 USDA NIFA-AFRI (National Institute of Food and Ag– Ag & Food Research Initiative) 475,000   National Science Foundation  4,300,000   USGS- Water Resource Center 28,760 14-15 MN Soybean 65,000   USDA NIFA-CAP (Coordinated Ag Products) 5,700,000   USDA CIG (Conservation Innovation Grant) 400,000 Research results used in WRAPS and One Watershed One Plan documents. Examples: Dr. Sadowsky’s work is often referenced in TMDLs related to E. coli Results from the Root River Sediment Budget have been used to inform implementation plans developed through the WRAPS and 1W1P process in Southeastern Minnesota watersheds. Efficiency values quantified through funded research have been incorporated into state supported assessment tools (PTMApp). ",,,,876138,18853,,1.2,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2017,993255,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (e) $788,000 the first year and $787,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ",,,,,,972674,20581,,1.25,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2016,1135603,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (e) $788,000 the first year and $787,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ",,,,,,1116436,19167,,1.25,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2015,959552,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2013: (e) $1,000,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018.  ","Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and impact of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed Clean Water Performance Reports in 2012 and 2014. At the heart of these reports is a suite of quantifiable performance measures.MDA's Clean Water Research Program is reporting on performance measure OPM12: Percent of research projects meeting research efficiency goals.This performance measure was developed using guidelines from the National Academies of Sciences 2008 report Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Each individual research project has specific deliverables.According to the National Academies' framework projects are evaluated according to two main criteria:1) Investment efficiency: is the agency making investments in the right projects? Investment efficiency is best evaluated by an independent, expert review panel that uses predominantly qualitative metrics to evaluate the program. The charge of the review panel is to determine if the research supported is relevant, of the highest quality, effective and efficient.Relevance is a measure of how well research supports the mission or purpose of the Clean Water Fund, which is to protect, enhance and restore lakes, rivers, streams, groundwater and drinking water in Minnesota.Quality refers to how research contributes to our understanding and knowledge of water resources in Minnesota. The review panel will evaluate the soundness, accuracy, novelty and reproducibility of the research projects.Effectiveness refers to the usability of research results by various stakeholders such as TMDL and other technical field staff, conservation professionals, and policy-makers.Efficiency refers to the ability to achieve quality, relevance, and effectiveness while minimizing resources devoted to the project in terms of time and money The review panel can also identify emerging issues and determine their place in research priorities. 2) Process efficiency: are the research investments being managed well?Process efficiency uses quantitative measures to track dollars and hours devoted to a project. Process efficiency refers to inputs, outputs, and intermediate outcomes of a research project and overall program.Inputs include agency resources such as funding, facilities, and staff that support research.Outputs are products delivered by a research project such as conclusions, reports, published papers, monitoring data and new techniques developed.Intermediate outcomes provide the review panel tangible metrics of evaluation. Examples of intermediate outcomes may include an improved body of knowledge available for decision-making, and newly developed tools and models. Tracking Outreach and EducationNumber of outreach activities (presentations, workshops, field days, and other events)Number of educational events (presentations or outreach to K-12 students or teachers, undergraduate science classes, non-science majors, grad students, etc)Number of peer-reviewed publications ",,,,,949783,9769,,"1 ","Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2014,691070,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2013: (e) $1,000,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to fiscal year 2015 ",,,,,681867,9203,,"1 ","Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2013,1050000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (e) $1,050,000 the first year and $1,050,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016.","Please refer to fiscal year 2015 ",,,,,,3500,,"1 ","Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2012,1050000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (e) $1,050,000 the first year and $1,050,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016.","Please refer to fiscal year 2015 ",,,,,,350,,0.1,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,,
23886,"Clearwater River Watershed Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Project",2014,185473,,,,,,,,,,,1.21,"Red Lake Watershed District","Local/Regional Government","The overall goal is to develop a Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Report and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study that will address water quality impairments and maintain or improve water quality throughout the Clearwater River watershed. The study will identify sources of pollutants to the streams and lakes, allocate pollution reduction goals, and prioritize and identify implementation strategies to maintain or improve water quality in key lakes and streams in the watershed. ",,"Clearwater River Watershed ",2014-03-24,2018-03-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Corey,Hanson,"Red Lake Watershed District","1000 Pennington Avenue S. ","Thief River Falls",MN,56701,"(218) 681-5800",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Beltrami, Clearwater, Mahnomen, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake",,"Clearwater River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clearwater-river-watershed-watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategy-wraps-project,,,,
23886,"Clearwater River Watershed Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Project",2016,100000,,,,,,,,,,,.61,"Red Lake Watershed District","Local/Regional Government","The overall goal is to develop a Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Report and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study that will address water quality impairments and maintain or improve water quality throughout the Clearwater River watershed. The study will identify sources of pollutants to the streams and lakes, allocate pollution reduction goals, and prioritize and identify implementation strategies to maintain or improve water quality in key lakes and streams in the watershed. ",,"Clearwater River Watershed ",2014-03-24,2018-03-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Corey,Hanson,"Red Lake Watershed District","1000 Pennington Avenue S. ","Thief River Falls",MN,56701,"(218) 681-5800",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Beltrami, Clearwater, Mahnomen, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake",,"Clearwater River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clearwater-river-watershed-watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategy-wraps-project,,,,
34241,"Cost-Share Program to Seal Wells in Sensitive Groundwater Aquifers",2016,31000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Drainage ditch inventory","This project resulted in the installation of 145 preventative practices.","Achieved proposed outcomes",15000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",60000,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.94,"Crow Wing County","Local/Regional Government","Crow Wing County, in cooperation with the municipalities within the County, plans to continue its successful well sealing program that pays 50% of the cost to seal unused/abandoned wells up to a maximum of $1000 per well. The amount of funding requested is $31,000 which is estimated to allow for the sealing of 80-100 wells. From 2012 to 2015, Crow Wing County sealed 65 wells as part of an earlier MDH well sealing grant from the Clean Water Fund. Priority will be given to wells located in or near existing wellhead protection areas. Additional ranking criteria would include the well size, whether it is public or private, whether it is a safety hazard, subject to flooding, within the isolation distances of MN Rules 4725, and its location in relation to other wells or areas with known contamination. Eligible entities would be required to contract with a licensed well contractor to conduct the work. Upon completion of the project (including the submittal of the necessary well sealing log to MDH), the licensed contractor would then submit the bill to the County for reimbursement.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chris,Pence,"Crow Wing County","326 Laurel St",Brainerd,MN,564013590,218-824-1123,chris.pence@crowwing.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Crow Wing",,"Crow Wing River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Sartell, Pine River, Rum River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/cost-share-program-seal-wells-sensitive-groundwater-aquifers,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2014,2574731,,,,,,,,,,,25,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2015,2909980,,,,,,,,,,,29,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2016,2753907,,,,,,,,,,,27,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2017,2429331,,,,,,,,,,,24,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2018,2696395,,,,,,,,,,,26,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2019,2599600,,,,,,,,,,,25,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2020,2973000,,,,,,,,,,,29,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2021,3045774,,,,,,,,,,,30,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2022,3009907,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(f)",,,,,,,,,,30,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2023,2650000,,,,,,,,,,,26.5,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2024,2027047,,,,,,,,,,,20,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2025,100000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(i)","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for accelerating completion of or updates to county geologic atlases and supplementing water chemistry or chemical movement studies. ","The DNR will continue to support specialized drilling at the Minnesota Geological Survey and water resource investigations as needed to enhance geologic atlases. The DNR is continuing dye tracing and nitrate monitoring, as well as adding enhancements to the Minnesota Groundwater Tracing Database (MGTD) through the contract with the University of Minnesota. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2024,100000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(i)","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for accelerating completion of or updates to county geologic atlases and supplementing water chemistry or chemical movement studies. ","The DNR will support specialized drilling, water chemistry and dye trace studies as needed to enhance geologic atlases and other water quality investigations. ","These funds were used to improve atlas products and our understanding of water quality in southeast Minnesota. Funding also supported the Minnesota Geological Survey upgrade of their geophysics software which will greatly improve the maps that they generate. ",,,,52113,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2023,,,,,,,,,31201,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2022,,,,,"After the adjusted budget forecast a portion of the Clean Water funds from FY21 rolled forward from in FY22, the DNR Atlas staff continued the unique groundwater dye-tracing studies in the cities of Pequot Lakes and Riverton in support of the MN Department of Health's Pathogen Project to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at several southeastern Minnesota locations in collaboration with local partners and MPCA to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and continued monitoring for flow, temperature, and nitrate concentrations at additional springs. The information is also used in developing the County Groundwater Atlas. DNR completed ten new traces including: Two traces with MDH at a Pathogen Project site in northeastern Minnesota Two traces west of Harmony in Fillmore County that greatly expanded our understanding of the Odessa springshed One trace west of Harmony in Fillmore County that importantly expanded the Engle springshed to the borders of the Big Spring Quarry One trace near Mystery Cave that assisted in delineating the springsheds of Saxifrage and Crayfish springs One trace northeast of Mystery Cave that greatly assisted in delineating the Meyer’s Spring springshed and our understanding or groundwater-surface water interactions there. Three traces at Bear Spring in conjunction with Olmsted County and U of M partners that have assisted in characterizing aquifer properties of the Galena Group ",,,,87030,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2021,150000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$150000 the first year and $150000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","The May 2020 budget forecast required agencies to reduce Clean Water Fund spending by $17.6 million dollars. Funding for the atlas program in FY21 was cut but the ENRTF portion of the funding continued. ","In FY21 the DNR published the Groundwater Atlas of Winona County and continued or completed data collection and analysis for: Becker Cass Dodge Hennepin Houston Hubbard Isanti Kandiyohi Nobles Olmsted Rock and Wadena counties. DNR supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information for atlases in Cook and Polk counties. As a result of reduced funding from DNR and the Clean Water Fund the amount of drilling scheduled for FY21 was reduced slowing overall progress for those counties. The drilling schedule was also negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and reduced field activities. Leveraging Clean Water funding that rolled forward from FY20 the DNR Atlas staff continued groundwater dye-tracing studies in the cities of Pequot Lakes and Riverton and expanded dye-tracing activities at YMCA Camp du Nord in support of the MN Department of Health's Pathogen Project to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at several southeastern Minnesota locations in collaboration with local partners and MPCA to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and continued monitoring at several stations for flow temperature and nitrate at additional springs. ",,,,49638,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2020,150000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$150000 the first year and $150000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","In FY20 the DNR Atlas Program will use Clean Water Fund to supplement geological and water chemistry information in Dodge Olmsted Kandiyohi Rock and Nobles counties. The DNR will publish atlases for Houston Winona Morrison Redwood Brown and Kanabec counties that were partially supported with Clean Water Funds. The DNR will conduct groundwater dye tracing studies at two locations and begin work at two additional locations in support of Minnesota Department of Health studies to identify the sources of pathogens and other contaminants in water supply wells. The DNR will also conduct dye tracing at up to four locations in southeastern Minnesota to better understand the groundwater flow related to trout streams and other surface waters and continue to five monitor sentinel springs. ","In FY20 the DNR published Groundwater Atlases for Morrison Redwood Brown and Kanabec counties and continued or completed data collection and analysis for: Winona Houston Hubbard Hennepin Dodge Olmsted Becker Cass Isanti Wadena Rock and Nobles counties. Covid-19 slowed progress on several counties and shifted work activities. DNR supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information for atlases in Lincoln Pipestone Chippewa and Yellow Medicine. Leveraging Clean Water funding the DNR Atlas staff completed groundwater dye tracing studies at McCarthy Beach State Park and YMCA Camp du Nord in support of a Minnesota Department of Health effort to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. DNR Atlas staff also began work on dye trace studies in support of the pathogen project in cities of Pequot Lakes and Riverton. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at several southeastern Minnesota locations to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and continued monitoring at several stations for flow temperature and nitrate at additional springs. ",,,,113913,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2019,125000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$125000 the first year and $125000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","In FY19 DNR will use Clean Water Fund to supplement geological and water chemistry information in Aitkin Olmsted and Steele counties. The DNR will publish atlases for Houston Meeker Morrison and Washington counties that were partially supported with Clean Water Funds. DNR will conduct groundwater dye tracing studies at two locations in support of Minnesota Department of Health studies to identify the sources of contaminants in water supply wells. DNR will also conduct dye tracing at two locations in southeastern Minnesota to better understand the groundwater flow related to trout streams and other surface waters. ","In FY19 the DNR published Groundwater Atlases for Washington and Meeker counties and continued or completed data collection and analysis for eight others: Hubbard Hennepin Dodge Olmsted Becker Cass Morrison and Wadena. We supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information in Aitkin Steele St. Louis Lake Dakota Pennington Otter Tail and Lac Qui Parle. Leveraging Clean Water funding the DNR Atlas staff continued a groundwater dye tracing study at McCarthy Beach State Park and began a study at YMCA Camp du Nord near Ely in support of a Minnesota Department of Health effort to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at four southeastern Minnesota locations to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and established continuous monitoring stations for flow temperature and nitrate at three additional springs.",,,,114205,10109,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2018,125000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$125000 the first year and $125000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","In FY18 the DNR will publish atlases for Houston Meeker Morrison Sherburne and Wright counties and complete data analysis and draft text and figures for six others: Brown Kanabec Redwood Wadena Washington and Winona. We will support completion of special high-quality drilling and coring by the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) in Kandiyohi Rock and Nobles counties to obtain detailed geologic mapping data for Part A of new atlases. ","In FY18 the DNR published Part B atlases for Clay Sherburne and Wright counties and completed data collection and analysis for eight others: Becker Cass Houston Isanti Meeker Morrison Wadena and Washington. We supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information in Dodge Kandiyohi Nobles and Rock counties. DNR staff completed a groundwater dye tracing study at McCarthy Beach State Park in support of a Minnesota Department of Health effort to identify the source of contaminants in nearby water supply wells. DNR also completed dye tracing at three southeastern Minnesota locations to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters.",,,,120045,12700,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2017,250000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","(h) $250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","In FY17 the DNR will publish atlases for Anoka Nicollet Sibley Renville and Clay counties and complete data analysis and draft text and figures for six others: Houston Meeker Morrison Sherburne Winona and Wright. We will continue building on Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) work in Part A of each atlas by acquiring detailed subsurface geologic data to better interpret existing well logs. We will also continue supporting MGS efforts to provide access to legacy atlas data and related MGS databases which helps us develop Part B of each atlas.","In FY17 DNR published Part B atlases for Anoka Nicollet Sibley and Renville counties and completed data analysis and draft text and figures for six others: Clay Houston Meeker Morrison Sherburne and Wright. We supported the completion of special high-quality drilling and coring by the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) in Cass Hubbard and Isanti counties to obtain detailed geologic mapping data for Part A of new atlases. We also continued to support the acquisition of legacy atlas data and related MGS databases.",,,,426559,33338,,3.3,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2016,250000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","(h) $250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","The DNR will complete atlases for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties. Here is a summary of our goals for each county active in the atlas program in FY2016: Clay: finish collecting expanded samples. Renville: finish collecting expanded samples and continue analyzing data and writing the report. Houston: finish collecting expanded field data; start analyzing data. Winona and Morrison: start collecting expanded field data; start analyzing data. Anoka Sherburne and Wright: continue analyzing data and writing reports. We will continue to use Clean Water Funds to build on the work by MGS in Part A of each atlas with scientific boreholes as described in the FY15 outcomes. We will also use Clean Water Funds to support MGS’s work to provide access to legacy atlas data and related MGS databases which help us develop Part B of each atlas. ","In FY16 the DNR completed the Blue Earth County atlas began the final internal and external review of the Nicollet and Sibley County atlases and made substantial progress on atlases for eight other counties. Specifically we completed data collection and continued analyzing data and writing reports for Anoka Sherburne Renville and Wright; we finished collecting expanded samples for Clay and Houston and started analyzing data for the latter; and we started collecting and analyzing expanded field data for Winona and Morrison. Also in FY16 we continued building on Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) work in Part A of each atlas and supported MGS efforts to provide access to legacy atlas data and related MGS databases. This helps us develop Part B of each atlas.",,,,515953,26915,,4.1,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2015,615000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$615000 the first year and $615000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","In FY15 the DNR will complete atlases for Chisago Blue Earth and Anoka counties. We will also finish expanded field data collection for Sherburne Wright and Renville counties. Data analysis and report preparation will continue for Nicollet and Sibley counties. Data analysis will be initiated for Sherburne Wright and Renville counties. We may start data collection in Clay county. Funds will also be used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases. Funds will be used to complete data acquisition at the research borehole installed at Afton State Park and properly seal the borehole.","In FY15 DNR County Geologic Atlas staff completed the Chisago County Geologic Atlas Part B. We continued to work on the atlases Blue Earth Nicollet Sibley Renville Clay Anoka Wright and Sherburne counties. The following is a status report for FY2015 for each active county atlas: Blue Earth Nicollet Sibley Anoka: in data analysis and report preparation stage. Renville: collecting and analyzing data. Clay: started collecting data. Wright: data collection complete; in data analysis and report preparation stage. Sherburne: entered data analysis stage We used Clean Water Funds to expand the number of groundwater samples collected for each atlas project. We expanded work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes which allowed us to get detailed subsurface geologic data. This data helps us better interpret existing well logs from Part A atlases. We also used funds to finish collecting data at the research borehole installed at Afton State Park and then to properly seal the borehole. Compared to planned outcomes for FY15 we finished most of the work we planned to do except the completion of atlases for Blue Earth and Anoka counties. The Blue Earth atlas Part B is in final draft; we continue to work on the Anoka report. We also made significant progress on the Nicollet and Sibley atlases. We did not finish collecting data for Renville County because of the laboratory data was not delivered on time but it is scheduled for the first quarter of FY16. ",,,,602706,73033,,3.4,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2014,615000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$615000 the first year and $615000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","In FY14 DNR will complete atlases for Carver and Chisago counties. DNR will also finish expanded field data collection for Anoka County. Data analysis and report preparation will continue for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties and continue or initiate data analysis for the Anoka County atlas. DNR will start data collection in Renville Wright and Sherburne counties. Vacancies will be filled and progress made on the hiring of positions for the expanded staffing level. Funds will also be used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases.","In FY14 DNR completed the County Geologic Atlas (Part B) for Carver County with the Chisago County Geologic Atlas (Part B) in final editing (publication expected September). Report preparation is underway for the Anoka County Geologic Atlas (Part B) with a draft completed. A Science Report Lead and an Editor were hired in the second half of FY14. The editor position had been vacant for about a year which delayed report preparation. The science report lead is a new position as team lead for the geographic information system (GIS)/cartography-maps/editing staff working together on atlas reports. Data analysis continued for Nicollet and Sibley counties but at a low level due to a staff vacancy. Final report preparation continued for the Blue Earth atlas. Field data collection was completed and data analysis started for Anoka county. New field data collection was initiated for Sherburne and Wright counties. Funds were used to expand the number of groundwater samples collected for each atlas project. Funds were used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases. Funds were also used to conduct scientific data acquisition at a research borehole installed at Afton State Park. ",,,,404825,50987,,3.9,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2013,,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","In FY13 DNR will complete atlases for Carver McLeod and Chisago counties. DNR will also finish expanded field data collection for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties and continue or initiate data analysis for those three atlases. Funds will also be used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases.","In FY13 DNR completed County Geologic Atlases (Part B) for McLeod county. Data analysis and report preparation was initiated or continued for Carver Chisago Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties. Field data collection was completed for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley. No new field data collection was initiated for additional counties. Work was delayed because of understaffing due to vacancies; three atlas staff took promotions to other units or agencies. The MGS drilled several scientific boreholes for detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases.",,,,106184,,,0.5,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2012,,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","In FY 12 DNR will complete four atlases (Benton Carver McLeod Chisago) and begin data collection and analysis on three additional counties (Blue Earth Nicollet Sibley). "," In FY12 DNR completed the Benton County Geologic Atlas (Part B); data analysis and report preparation continued for Carver McLeod and Chisago Counties. Field data collection was initiated for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley Counties.",,,,23350,,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2011,,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","In FY10 and 11 DNR will complete two atlases for each fiscal year.","In FY11 DNR completed the Carlton County Geologic Atlas (Part B). DNR also collected field data for Atlases in Benton Carver McLeod and Chisago Counties and continued data analysis and began report production for the Atlases in Benton and Chisago Counties.",,,,243388,32400,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2010,1000000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","DNR will complete two atlases for each fiscal year.","In FY 10 DNR completed the Todd County Geologic Atlas Part B. Clean Water funding is used to improve the quality of County Geologic Atlases by collecting additional subsurface geologic samples expanding the number of sites sampled for water chemistry starting the process of installing a research well to collect stratified groundwater data from multiple aquifers and purchasing and repairing equipment.",,,,26705,30000,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,,
10008292,"Crow River Watershed Partnership Monitoring Project",2016,157043,,,,,,,,,,,1.14,"Crow River Organization of Water","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at five subwatershed sites and two basin sites annually from 2016-2019, based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Diane,Sander,"Crow River Organization of Water","311 Brighton Ave Ste C",Buffalo,MN,55313,,,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"McLeod, Meeker, Stearns, Wright",,"North Fork Crow River, South Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/crow-river-watershed-partnership-monitoring-project,,,,
10008292,"Crow River Watershed Partnership Monitoring Project",2019,88765,,,,,,,,,,,.38,"Crow River Organization of Water","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at five subwatershed sites and two basin sites annually from 2016-2019, based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Diane,Sander,"Crow River Organization of Water","311 Brighton Ave Ste C",Buffalo,MN,55313,,,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"McLeod, Meeker, Stearns, Wright",,"North Fork Crow River, South Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/crow-river-watershed-partnership-monitoring-project,,,,
33829,"Crow Wing County Citizen Monitoring Program Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG)",2016,48450,,,,,,,,,,,0.42,"Crow Wing County SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The project will include lake monitoring on seventeen lakes found in the Mississippi River - Brainerd watershed in East Central Crow Wing County (CWC). The project will be conducted in an effort to gain data on these data-deficient lakes. One of the goals of the CWC Local Comprehensive Water Plan (CWP) is to establish a countywide Comprehensive Monitoring Plan (CMP). Surface water assessment monitoring will enable state 303(d) and 305(b) assessments and provide a better understanding of these lakes. The lake data will help local government units prioritize and implement water quality protection in CWC. The project also includes four Mississippi River - Brainerd watershed stream sites that are projected to be sampled 2016-2017.",,"Mississippi River - Brainerd Watershed ",2016-03-02,2018-01-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Sheila,Carleton,"Crow Wing County SWCD","7118 Clearwater Road",Baxter,MN,56425,"(218) 828-6197",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Aitkin, Crow Wing",,"Mississippi River - Brainerd",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/crow-wing-county-citizen-monitoring-program-surface-water-assessment-grant-swag,,,,
33829,"Crow Wing County Citizen Monitoring Program Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG)",2017,6326,,,,,,,,,,,.27,"Crow Wing County SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The project will include lake monitoring on seventeen lakes found in the Mississippi River - Brainerd watershed in East Central Crow Wing County (CWC). The project will be conducted in an effort to gain data on these data-deficient lakes. One of the goals of the CWC Local Comprehensive Water Plan (CWP) is to establish a countywide Comprehensive Monitoring Plan (CMP). Surface water assessment monitoring will enable state 303(d) and 305(b) assessments and provide a better understanding of these lakes. The lake data will help local government units prioritize and implement water quality protection in CWC. The project also includes four Mississippi River - Brainerd watershed stream sites that are projected to be sampled 2016-2017.",,"Mississippi River - Brainerd Watershed ",2016-03-02,2018-01-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Sheila,Carleton,"Crow Wing County SWCD","7118 Clearwater Road",Baxter,MN,56425,"(218) 828-6197",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Aitkin, Crow Wing",,"Mississippi River - Brainerd",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/crow-wing-county-citizen-monitoring-program-surface-water-assessment-grant-swag,,,,
34168,"Crow River E. Coli Reduction Through Feedlot Compliance",2016,270000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Data development","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 919 lbs of BOD, 4133 lbs COD, 2.07E+15 E. Coli, and 228 lbs nitrogen.","Achieved proposed outcomes",37600,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",150400,1020,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",1.13,"Wright SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Wright Soil and Water Conservation District (Wright SWCD) has partnered with the Crow River Organization of Waters (CROW), the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Wright County Planning and Zoning on this bacterial impairment reduction project to bring feedlot operations into compliance in the targeted North Fork Crow River (NFCR) impaired Unnamed Creek watershed. An analysis of the NFCR TMDL for Bacteria, Nutrients, and Turbidity was done to determine the area to be prioritized for further review of livestock operations in order to reduce the E. coli levels to meet the state standard. The largest operations, those over 250 animal units were reviewed for compliance and found that one facility within the E. coli impaired watershed was non-compliant. A preliminary plan has been drafted by NRCS engineers that will bring this feedlot into compliance and allow them move from daily hauling and land applying manure to strategic application by incorporating a manure lagoon into the plan.",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Luke,Johnson,"Wright SWCD","311 Brighton Ave S Ste C",Buffalo,MN,55313,763-682-1970,luke.johnson@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Wright,,"Mississippi River - St. Cloud, North Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/crow-river-e-coli-reduction-through-feedlot-compliance,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34223,"Crystal Lake Watershed Phosphorus Reduction Project",2016,374500,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This grant will directly address phosphorus by targeting agricultural surface flow and subsurface drain tile that outlets into CD56 and ultimately Crystal Lake. Bioreactors reduce nitrates by 60%, and the sediment loading will be reduced by an estimated 1,638 tons/yr. Phosphorus Removal Structures will reduce Pohsphorus by an estimated 75-95%, or 2,209 lbs/yr.","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 3705.9 lbs of nitrate, 485.08 lbs of phosphorus, 328.91 tons of sediment, 1341.08 tons per year of soil loss. Additionally, 148 preventative pollution practices (with no associated estimation calculator) were installed as part of this grant project.","achieved proposed outcomes",98625,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",374500,,,0.51,"Blue Earth County SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The purpose of this project is to reduce phosphorus loading to Crystal Lake transported primarily through County Ditch 56. Crystal Lake is listed on MPCA's 303d listing for phosphorus impairment. Increased phosphorus levels have caused toxic algal blooms, reducing its appeal to recreationalists and economic draw for the City of Lake Crystal. This project will directly address phosphorus sources from agricultural land. Phosphorus will be addressed by targeting agricultural surface flow and subsurface drain tile before entering CD56 through nutrient management, cover crops, conservation tillage practices, and nutrient removal structures. We will also be coordinating with watershed partners such as the Crystal Waters Project and the Blue Earth County Drainage Authority to promote urban and in-ditch practices to reduce phosphorus. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-03-06,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jerad,Bach,"Blue Earth County SWCD","1160 Victory Dr Ste 3",Mankato,MN,560015307,507-345-4744,jerad.bach@blueearthswcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Blue Earth",,"Minnesota River - Mankato",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/crystal-lake-watershed-phosphorus-reduction-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
36602,"Developing Indices of Streamflow Alteration",2016,75000,,,,,,,,,,,.72,"US Geological Survey","Federal Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has identified streamflow alteration as a key stressor on aquatic life, but the characteristics of streamflow alteration acting as stressors have not been identified in the MPCA Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) process. Without indices that characterize streamflow alteration, the MPCA cannot quantitatively associate metrics of aquatic life condition to streamflow alteration. The lack of quantifiable indices limits the ability of the MPCA to assess environmental streamflow needs for streams and rivers throughout Minnesota. The project will develop relationships between streamflow and biological data metrics for use in evaluating streamflow alteration as a stressor on aquatic life in rivers and streams in Minnesota. ",,,2016-04-20,2018-01-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Mary Jo",Sager,"US Geological Survey","2280 Woodale Dr ","Mounds View",MN,55112,"(651) 783-3120",,Research,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/developing-indices-streamflow-alteration,,,,
36602,"Developing Indices of Streamflow Alteration",2017,75000,,,,,,,,,,,.72,"US Geological Survey","Federal Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has identified streamflow alteration as a key stressor on aquatic life, but the characteristics of streamflow alteration acting as stressors have not been identified in the MPCA Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) process. Without indices that characterize streamflow alteration, the MPCA cannot quantitatively associate metrics of aquatic life condition to streamflow alteration. The lack of quantifiable indices limits the ability of the MPCA to assess environmental streamflow needs for streams and rivers throughout Minnesota. The project will develop relationships between streamflow and biological data metrics for use in evaluating streamflow alteration as a stressor on aquatic life in rivers and streams in Minnesota. ",,,2016-04-20,2018-01-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Mary Jo",Sager,"US Geological Survey","2280 Woodale Dr ","Mounds View",MN,55112,"(651) 783-3120",,Research,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/developing-indices-streamflow-alteration,,,,
34226,"Development of a Terrain Based Water Quality Model for the Carver County Water Management Organization",2016,31000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The outcome of this project will be a comprehensive document for guiding the targeting of wetland restorations resulting in measurable water quality and flood reduction benefits for priority resources. ",,,7750,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",31000,,"Members for Carver County WMO are: ",0.12,"Carver County WMO","Local/Regional Government","Carver County has identified water quality improvement of Carver, Bevens and Silver Creek as a water management priority. This project will identify storage or wetland restoration sites that are highly effective at reducing pollutant loading to downstream impaired waters using high-resolution Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data and Geographic Information System (GIS) processes. The watershed landscape has been highly modified for agricultural production land development; less than 50 percent of pre-settlement wetland acres remain in Carver County. The creation of runoff storage is a viable tool to improve water quality in Carver, Bevens and Silver Creek. While there are potentially many restoration sites, the water quality impact from an individual site depends on the site's physical characteristics, watershed size, and land use. These factors impact sediment and nutrient loading and removal effectiveness of wetland restorations and storage practices. Potential sites that are evaluated now are done so opportunistically without a watershed wide evaluation of their effectiveness. The project will allow Carver County to prioritize sites and pursue the most effective storage and wetland restoration sites to accelerate implementation. The outcome of this project will be a comprehensive document for guiding the targeting of wetland restorations resulting in measurable water quality and flood reduction benefits for priority resources.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Charlie,Sawdey,"Carver County WMO","600 East 4th Street",Chaska,MN,55318,952-361-1810,csawdey@co.carver.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Carver,,"Lower Minnesota River ",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/development-terrain-based-water-quality-model-carver-county-water-management-organization,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34239,"Dodge Saturated Buffer Project Implementation",2016,50625,"Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","With 10 kg/acre/year of NO3 removal from a minimum 15 acre drainage area, planned projects should result in an estimated 150 kg/yr of NO3 removal each. An estimated 1,350 kg or 1.35 MT/yr are anticipated for the entire project. ","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 1253.04 pounds of Nitrogen.","achieved some of the proposed outcomes",9265,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",37007,,"Members for Dodge SWCD are: Bill Thompson, David Livingston, Don Heser, Glenn Hahn, Larry Scherger",0.27,"Dodge SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Nitrogen is a serious problem in Minnesota's Mississippi River Basin and the Dodge Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) will address this problem through saturated buffers. Nitrates have been linked to adverse health effects, and nitrogen is the leading cause of the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico. Agriculture drainage through the use of tile drainage systems have been identified as the number one leading source of nitrogen in the Mississippi River Basin. The Dodge SWCD is going to treat agriculture tile drainage systems with saturated buffers before they discharge into Minnesota's rivers, streams, and ditches. Agriculture tile drainage systems that are treated by saturated buffers effectively treat nitrogen in tile water, and saturated buffers are considered one the most cost effective treatments for nitrogen today. Through this grant the Dodge SWCD plans to install 9 saturated buffers, reducing an estimated 1.35 Metric Tons/year load from Minnesota's waters.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Adam,King,"Dodge SWCD","916 2nd St SE","Dodge Center",MN,559279601,"507-374-6364 x 3",adam.king@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Dodge,,"Cedar River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dodge-saturated-buffer-project-implementation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Annie Felix-Gerth",No
33410,"Dresbach Twp",2016,59601,"MS Section 446A.075","Small Community Wastewater Treatment Program","Site evaluation and plan to fix failing septic systems","Site evaluation and plan to fix failing septic systems",,,,,,,,"Dresbach Township","Local/Regional Government","Evaluate alternatives to fix failing septic systems in unsewered area",,,2015-07-17,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jeff,Freeman,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority","332 Minnesota Street, Suite W820","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 259-7465",jeff.freeman@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority ",,Winona,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/dresbach-twp,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2022,1200000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,200,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found or anticipated to be found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist and for the department's laboratory to analyze for these contaminants. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2021,1200000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,200,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found or anticipated to be found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist and for the department's laboratory to analyze for these contaminants ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2020,1700000,"2019 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 8","$1,700,000 the first year and $1,700,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, for improving the department's capacity to monitor the water quality of drinking water sources and to develop interventions to improve water quality, and for the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. Of this amount, $400,000 the first year and $400,000 the second year are for the commissioner to work in cooperation with the commissioners of agriculture, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and natural resources to sample surface water and groundwater, including drinking water sources, and for an assessment to evaluate potential risks from microplastics and nanoplastics and identify appropriate follow-up actions. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Initiative reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Public information sheets are created for both chemicals that have completed screening and chemicals that have published guidance and are made available on the Minnesota Department of Health website. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2019,1100000,"2017 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 17, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100, the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Initiative reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Public information sheets are created for both chemicals that have completed screening and chemicals that have published guidance and are made available on the Minnesota Department of Health website. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2018,1100000,"2017 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 17, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100, the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Initiative reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Public information sheets are created for both chemicals that have completed screening and chemicals that have published guidance and are made available on the Minnesota Department of Health website. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2017,1100000,"Minnesota Session Law, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Screening Profiles are created for screening chemicals and Information Sheets are created for chemicals with published guidance. These resources for stakeholders are available at: http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/risk/guidance/dwec/chemunderrev.html. ",,,,,,,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2016,1100000,"Minnesota Session Law, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. The commissioner shall contract with the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to provide an independent review of the department's drinking water contaminants of emerging concern program. The review must include an assessment of the process used by the department to rank contaminants that are threats to drinking water supplies and include a comparison of efforts at the department with efforts by other states and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The review must be submitted to the Clean Water Council and the chairs and ranking minority members of the House of Representatives and Senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources by June 1, 2016.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Screening Profiles are created for screening chemicals and Information Sheets are created for chemicals with published guidance. These resources for stakeholders are available at: http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/risk/guidance/dwec/chemunderrev.html. ","At the close of 2016, the Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program has screened approximately 12 contaminants. Published health-based has been completed for four contaminants: - 17alpha Ethinylestradiol - Mestranol - Dichlorofluoromethane (Freon 21) - Microcystin Guidance for an additional three contaminants is currently pending. The MDH Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program is on track to meet the goals for screening and guidance development for the 2016-2017 biennium. ",,,,,,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2015,1150000,"Minnesota Session Law, Article 2, Section 8 (a) ","$1,150,000 the first year and $1,150,000 the second are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits, including triclosan, and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,9.5,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2014,1150000,"Minnesota Session Law, Article 2, Section 8 (a) ","$1,150,000 the first year and $1,150,000 the second are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits, including triclosan, and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,9.5,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2013,1020000,"Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 6, Article 2, Section 8 (a)","$1,020,000 the first year and $1,020,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2012,1020000,"Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 6, Article 2, Section 8 (a)","$1,020,000 the first year and $1,020,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2011,744717,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (b)","$445,000 the first year and $890,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists. The commissioner shall characterize and issue health-based guidance for three or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2010, and seven or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2011.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2010,250291,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (b)","$445,000 the first year and $890,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists. The commissioner shall characterize and issue health-based guidance for three or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2010, and seven or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2011.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,,
31198,"Duluth WRAPS Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) Modeling",2016,93637,,,,,,,,,,,0.36,"Tetra Tech","For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to construct, calibrate, and validate one fine-scale Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) watershed model for the Duluth Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) project area for the simulation period 1995–2012. In addition, an existing condition (post-2012 flood) model scenario will be developed for use in WRAPS development. The contractor will produce HSPF models that can readily be used to provide information to support conventional parameter TMDLs. ",,"St. Louis River WatershedLake Superior - North Watershed",2015-09-21,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Brian,Fredrickson,"MPCA Duluth Office","525 Lake Ave. S., Suite 400",Duluth,MN,55802,"(218) 302-6604",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Carlton, St. Louis",,"Lake Superior - North, St. Louis River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/duluth-wraps-hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-modeling,,,,
33384,"Elk River",2016,2609610,"MS Section 446A.073","Point Source Implementation Grant Program","Reduce wastewater phosphorus discharge to 1 mg/L or less","Reduce wastewater phosphorus discharge to 1 mg/L or less",,8378221,City,,,,,"Elk River, City of","Local/Regional Government","Construct wastewater treatment improvements to meet TMDL wasteload requirement",,,2015-06-30,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jeff,Freeman,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority","332 Minnesota Street, Suite W820","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 259-7465",jeff.freeman@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority ",,Sherburne,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/elk-river,,,,
34236,"Engaging Schools in Retrofit BMPs",2016,150000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Community Partners 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","""It is estimated that six projects will be completed resulting in the collective removal of an estimated 611 tons sediment and 7 pounds of phosphorus being reduced each year. In addition, the annual volume of water retained on these sites is estimated to be 6.3 acre-ft per year."" ","This project resulted in estimated reductions of 6 lb. of phosphorus per year, 1 ton of sediment per year, and 3 acre-feet of stormwater per year",,353000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",150000,,"Members for Ramsey-Washington Metro WD are: ",,"Ramsey-Washington Metro WD","Local/Regional Government","The Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) is responsible for the protection and restoration of the water quality of 20 lakes and 5 creeks within its boundary. Permit and voluntary cost share programs serve to slowly redevelop the watershed to the benefit of these water bodies. However, additional projects are needed- not only to implement green infrastructure in areas that need extra restoration and protection, but also to foster new relationships between citizens and the RWMWD to rally together in a common goal to the benefit of their water resources. This effort results in projects, but also in the creation of future stewards of the watershed district that can help to carry on the RWMWD's mission, and promote its work. The RWMWD has identified schools as a primary target for stormwater management because of their large impervious surface areas with little or no stormwater treatment on site. During the last year and a half the District has inventoried and assessed its schools though a CWF Accelerated Implementation Fund grant to identify high priority sites where stormwater volume and pollution reduction projects can be most cost effective. Communication with principals, school district grounds staff and educators indicates that they have a strong interest in partnering with RWMWD to address water quality goals, but they do not have the budget to cover the costs of constructing BMPS. This project will offer grant funds to schools for BMP retrofit projects that will intercept, treat and infiltrate or filter runoff that will reduce total phosphorus (TP) and total suspended solids (TSS) loads to high priority areas water bodies within RWMWD. The goals of this project are to collaborate with and empower school districts, reduce barriers to the implementation of BMP projects and develop long-term partnerships to ensure that the Watershed District can continue to work with schools into the future to reduce stormwater run-off from their sites.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Paige,Ahlborg,"Ramsey-Washington Metro WD",,,,,651-792-7964,paige.ahlborg@rwmwd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Ramsey, Washington",,"Mississippi River - Twin Cities",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/engaging-schools-retrofit-bmps,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
10008282,"Event Based Stream Sampling in Northeastern Minnesota",2016,135061,,,,,,,,,,,1.1,"Regents of the University of Minnesota","Public College/University","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) requests assistance from local partners to collect samples and field data at designated stream monitoring sites for the purpose of assessing water quality and calculating annual pollutant loads. The University of Minnesota Duluth's Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI-UMD) has a long-term interest in identifying status and trends that may reflect short- and long-term response to impacts at local, regional, and global scales such as urbanization, agriculture, mining and forestry practices, invasive species introductions, atmospheric deposition, and climate change. It has also worked collaboratively and in partnership with MPCA and other state, federal, and local agencies on a number of assessment projects, including several previously-funded SWA grants. NRRI –UMD will collect base flow and event-based water quality data from streams within the St. Louis River and Rainy watershed in northeastern Minnesota. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Elaine,Ruzycki,"Natural Resources Research Institute","5013 Miller Trunk Hwy",Duluth,MN,55811,"(218) 788-2737",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake, St. Louis",,"Cloquet River, Rainy River - Headwaters, St. Louis River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/event-based-stream-sampling-northeastern-minnesota,,,,
10008282,"Event Based Stream Sampling in Northeastern Minnesota",2018,49040,,,,,,,,,,,.55,"Regents of the University of Minnesota","Public College/University","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) requests assistance from local partners to collect samples and field data at designated stream monitoring sites for the purpose of assessing water quality and calculating annual pollutant loads. The University of Minnesota Duluth's Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI-UMD) has a long-term interest in identifying status and trends that may reflect short- and long-term response to impacts at local, regional, and global scales such as urbanization, agriculture, mining and forestry practices, invasive species introductions, atmospheric deposition, and climate change. It has also worked collaboratively and in partnership with MPCA and other state, federal, and local agencies on a number of assessment projects, including several previously-funded SWA grants. NRRI –UMD will collect base flow and event-based water quality data from streams within the St. Louis River and Rainy watershed in northeastern Minnesota. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Elaine,Ruzycki,"Natural Resources Research Institute","5013 Miller Trunk Hwy",Duluth,MN,55811,"(218) 788-2737",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake, St. Louis",,"Cloquet River, Rainy River - Headwaters, St. Louis River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/event-based-stream-sampling-northeastern-minnesota,,,,
10008282,"Event Based Stream Sampling in Northeastern Minnesota",2019,34240,,,,,,,,,,,.55,"Regents of the University of Minnesota","Public College/University","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) requests assistance from local partners to collect samples and field data at designated stream monitoring sites for the purpose of assessing water quality and calculating annual pollutant loads. The University of Minnesota Duluth's Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI-UMD) has a long-term interest in identifying status and trends that may reflect short- and long-term response to impacts at local, regional, and global scales such as urbanization, agriculture, mining and forestry practices, invasive species introductions, atmospheric deposition, and climate change. It has also worked collaboratively and in partnership with MPCA and other state, federal, and local agencies on a number of assessment projects, including several previously-funded SWA grants. NRRI –UMD will collect base flow and event-based water quality data from streams within the St. Louis River and Rainy watershed in northeastern Minnesota. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Elaine,Ruzycki,"Natural Resources Research Institute","5013 Miller Trunk Hwy",Duluth,MN,55811,"(218) 788-2737",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake, St. Louis",,"Cloquet River, Rainy River - Headwaters, St. Louis River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/event-based-stream-sampling-northeastern-minnesota,,,,
10008282,"Event Based Stream Sampling in Northeastern Minnesota",2021,57020,,,,,,,,,,,.45,"Regents of the University of Minnesota","Public College/University","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) requests assistance from local partners to collect samples and field data at designated stream monitoring sites for the purpose of assessing water quality and calculating annual pollutant loads. The University of Minnesota Duluth's Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI-UMD) has a long-term interest in identifying status and trends that may reflect short- and long-term response to impacts at local, regional, and global scales such as urbanization, agriculture, mining and forestry practices, invasive species introductions, atmospheric deposition, and climate change. It has also worked collaboratively and in partnership with MPCA and other state, federal, and local agencies on a number of assessment projects, including several previously-funded SWA grants. NRRI –UMD will collect base flow and event-based water quality data from streams within the St. Louis River and Rainy watershed in northeastern Minnesota. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Elaine,Ruzycki,"Natural Resources Research Institute","5013 Miller Trunk Hwy",Duluth,MN,55811,"(218) 788-2737",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake, St. Louis",,"Cloquet River, Rainy River - Headwaters, St. Louis River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/event-based-stream-sampling-northeastern-minnesota,,,,
10008282,"Event Based Stream Sampling in Northeastern Minnesota",2022,58241,,,,,,,,,,,.45,"Regents of the University of Minnesota","Public College/University","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) requests assistance from local partners to collect samples and field data at designated stream monitoring sites for the purpose of assessing water quality and calculating annual pollutant loads. The University of Minnesota Duluth's Natural Resources Research Institute (NRRI-UMD) has a long-term interest in identifying status and trends that may reflect short- and long-term response to impacts at local, regional, and global scales such as urbanization, agriculture, mining and forestry practices, invasive species introductions, atmospheric deposition, and climate change. It has also worked collaboratively and in partnership with MPCA and other state, federal, and local agencies on a number of assessment projects, including several previously-funded SWA grants. NRRI –UMD will collect base flow and event-based water quality data from streams within the St. Louis River and Rainy watershed in northeastern Minnesota. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Elaine,Ruzycki,"Natural Resources Research Institute","5013 Miller Trunk Hwy",Duluth,MN,55811,"(218) 788-2737",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake, St. Louis",,"Cloquet River, Rainy River - Headwaters, St. Louis River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/event-based-stream-sampling-northeastern-minnesota,,,,
34258,"Field to Stream Partnership Phase II Implementation",2016,804385,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project's goal is a 20% reduction in nitrogen by 2020 which aligns with the MN Nutrient Reduction Strategy (NRS) goal for a 20% nitrogen load reduction from ag watersheds by 2025. Estimated reductions of sediment by 1,504 tons/yr, phosphorus by 1,070 lbs/yr, and nitrogen by 15 lbs/yr are anticipated as a result of this project.","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 5936 pounds of Phosphorus, 16590.23 tons of Sediment, and 16335.31 tons of Soil Loss.","achieved proposed outcomes",887056,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",804385,19835,"Members for Fillmore SWCD are: Brian Hazel, Leonard Jr Leutink, Pamela Mensink, Timothy Gossman, Travis Willford",1.01,"Fillmore SWCD","Local/Regional Government","After 6 years of intensive baseline monitoring at 5 edge-of-field sites, 1 intermittent and 3 in-stream sites in 3 sub-watersheds representing the geomorphic regions of the Root River, the second phase of the project is well prepared for the implementation of BMPs. Continued monitoring will be used to measure the effectiveness of the BMPs for the next 6 years. In preparation for BMP implementation, extensive planning was completed using LiDAR terrain analysis and the Tomer Framework to prioritize practices. Following this analysis, 31 of 32 producers in two sub-watersheds cooperated in field walkovers to identify over 100 of the priority conservation practices they would be willing to implement on their farms to address critical source areas for sediment, nutrients and bacteria. The priority practices are grassed waterways, water and sediment control basins and feedlot runoff control projects.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Donna,Rasmussen,"Fillmore SWCD","900 Washington St NW Box A",Preston,MN,55965,"507-765-3878 x 3",donna.rasmussen@fillmoreswcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Fillmore, Houston",,"Root River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/field-stream-partnership-phase-ii-implementation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Annie Felix-Gerth",No
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2014,55000,,,,,,,,,,,,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2015,20000,,,,,,,,,,,.2,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2016,27493,,,,,,,,,,,.2,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2018,24307,,,,,,,,,,,.2,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2022,45572,,,,,,,,,,,.4,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2023,9900,,,,,,,,,,,.09,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
28111,"Fish Identification for U of M James Ford Bell Museum",2024,900,,,,,,,,,,,,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","Public College/University","The Bell Museum will sort and identify all fish samples collected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA) North and South Biological Monitoring Units. The Bell Museum of Natural History (Bell Museum) will provide professional fish Identification expertise to the MPCA fish voucher program, while also helping the Bell Museum annually update their fish distribution map for the State of Minnesota. As the MPCA samples and vouchers species of significance, the Bell Museum shall catalog these species into their official fish collection. ",,,2013-12-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kassandra,Ford,"University of Minnesota: James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History","135 Skok Hall, 2003 Upper Buford Circle","St. Paul",MN,55108,"(612) 624-3600",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-identification-u-m-james-ford-bell-museum,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2025,545000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(c); M.L. 2024, Ch. 106, Article 2, Section 5","M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(c): $455,000 the first year and $455,000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants, including PFAS compounds, and monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. M.L. 2024, Ch. 106, Article 2, Section 5: $90,000 the second year is for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants, including PFAS compounds, and monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. This appropriation is added to the appropriation in Laws 2023, chapter 40, article 2, section 5, paragraph (c). ","In FY25, the DNR will collect fish from 130 waterbodies. Resulting sampling data will be used to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. 30 of the FY25 waterbodies were selected to overlap with a MNDNR study of zebra mussel infested walleye fisheries. Overlap of contaminants sampling with this study will help investigate the potential for increased mercury bioaccumulation in infested waters which is an emerging concern. The remaining 100 waterbody samples will consist of multiple fish species of size classes relevant to human consumption. 50 of the FY24 waterbodies will also be analyzed for PFAS. 9 river sites will also be analyzed for PCBs.   ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2024,455000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(c)","$455,000 the first year and $455,000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants, including PFAS compounds, and monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. "," In FY24 the DNR will collect fish from 130 waterbodies. Resulting sampling data will be used to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. 23 of the FY24 waterbodies were selected to overlap with a MNDNR study of zebra mussel infested walleye fisheries. Overlap of contaminants sampling with this study will help investigate the potential for increased mercury bioaccumulation in infested waters which is an emerging concern. The remaining 107 waterbody samples will consist of multiple fish species of size classes relevant to human consumption. 38 of the FY24 waterbodies will also be analyzed for PFAS. 4 of these sites will be used to compare transcriptome differences between fish in high and low PFAS concentration waters. 3 river sites will also be analyzed for PCBs. ","In FY24, the DNR collected and tested fish samples from a total of 130 waterbodies for contaminants testing. Each waterbody sample consisted of multiple fish species. Fish species and size classes’ samples were relevant to human consumption. An average of 20 fish were sampled for each waterbody with a total of 2,205 fish tested for mercury, 40 fish tested for PCBs, and 493 fish were tested for PFAS. Contaminant data were collected, processed, and delivered to MPCA partners to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends.   ",,,,175941,32498,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2023,175000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$175000 the first year and $175000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. "," In FY23 the DNR will collect fish from an additional 89 waterbodies in addition to the surplus waterbodies collected but not tested in FY22, for a total of 150 waterbodies. Resulting sampling data will be used to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. 28 of the FY23 waterbodies were selected to overlap with a MNDNR study of zebra mussel infested walleye fisheries. Overlap of contaminants sampling with this study will help investigate the potential for increased mercury bioaccumulation in infested waters which is an emerging concern. The remaining 122 waterbody samples will consist of multiple fish species of size classes relevant to human consumption. "," In FY23 the DNR collected and tested fish samples from a total of 120 waterbodies for contaminants testing. Each waterbody sample consisted of multiple fish species. Fish species and size classes’ samples were relevant to human consumption. An average of 20 fish were sampled for each waterbody with a total of 2,471 fish tested for mercury, 35 fish tested for PCBs, and 63 fish tested for PFAS. Contaminant data were collected, processed, and delivered to MPCA partners to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,159600,11497,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2022,175000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$175000 the first year and $175000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. ","In FY22, the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds. ","In FY22, the DNR collected and tested fish samples from a total of 116 waterbodies for contaminants testing. Each waterbody sample consisted of multiple fish species. Fish species and size classes’ samples were relevant to human consumption. An average of 25 fish were sampled for each waterbody with a total of 2,538 fish tested for mercury, 44 fish tested for PCBs, and 333 fish tested for PFAS. Fish samples from an additional 61 surplus waterbodies were sampled and samples archived for testing in FY23. Contaminant data were collected, processed, and delivered to MPCA partners to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,159600,11497,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2021,135000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. ","The May 2020 budget forecast required agencies to reduce Clean Water Fund spending by $17.6 million dollars. Funding for supplemental fish contaminant testing was eliminated for FY21 due in part to the inability to collect fish in as many lakes as normal. ","The May 2020 budget forecast required agencies to reduce Clean Water Fund spending by $17.6 million dollars. Funding for supplemental fish contaminant testing was eliminated for FY21 due in part to the inability to collect fish in as many lakes as normal. ",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2020,135000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. ","In FY20 the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds. ","In FY20 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds. ",,,,126427,8572,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2019,135000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time.","In FY19 the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds.","FY19 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination using the Clean Water Fund to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,128427,7574,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2018,135000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time.","In FY18 the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination that will be used by other agencies to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds.","FY18 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,120258,7371,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2017,135000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","(c) $135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. (d)","In FY17 the DNR will test 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants. ","In FY17 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination that is used by other agencies for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds.",,,,126427,7574,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2016,135000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","(c) $135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. (d)","Every year the DNR will test 80 lake and river sites for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY16 the DNR tested 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants.",,,,138587,14274,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2015,135000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time. ","Every year the DNR will test 80 lake and river sites for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY15 the DNR tested 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants.",,,,144237,,,0.2,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2014,135000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time. ","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","FY14 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants. ",,,,120482,4180,,0.2,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2013,130000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$130000 the first year and $130000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","FY13 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,113269,,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2012,130000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$130000 the first year and $130000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","FY12 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,112245,17725,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2011,132000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY11 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,107961,24038,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2010,130000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY10 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,,,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,,
34230,"Forest Lake Wetland Treatment Basin Implementation",2016,162000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Level III Feedlot Inventory","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 56 lbs of phosphorus.","Achieved proposed outcomes",28375,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",113498,1407,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",3.15,"Comfort Lake-Forest Lake WD","Local/Regional Government","Forest Lake is one of the top recreational lakes in the metro area with a diverse and healthy fishery along with thee public accesses. The water quality of Forest Lake also impacts downstream waters, particularly Comfort Lake, the Sunrise River, and ultimately Lake St. Croix. A water quality study was completed for Forest Lake identifying nutrient reduction goals to meet state water quality standards for all three basins of Forest Lake along with the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District's (CLFLWD) long term goal water quality goals for the lake. This project is located on one of the eastern tributaries entering the most eastern basin of Forest Lake. This tributary is a known water quality concern and residents have reported algae blooms on several occasions near the outfall of this tributary. The wetland just upstream of the outfall to Forest Lake has been highly altered and degraded. This project proposes improvements to the wetland basin including excavation of nutrient rich sediments (documented based on sediment testing), restoration of native vegetative cover, protection of existing high quality native vegetation, and incorporation of native buffers surrounding the basin.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mike,Kinney,"Comfort Lake-Forest Lake WD","44 Lake Street South","Forest Lake",MN,55025,651-209-9753,michael.kinney@clflwd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Washington,,"Lower St. Croix River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forest-lake-wetland-treatment-basin-implementation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2025,300000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(g)","$650,000 the first year and $650,000 the second year are for applied research and tools, including maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries, streams, and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data and for assessing the effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY25 DNR will complete intensive field monitoring on ~100 timber harvest sites in eleven targeted watersheds in central and northern Minnesota. Aerial image acquisition and landowner contact and efforts to acquire permissions for access are currently underway. Coordination with Minnesota Logger Education Program, Sustainable Forestry Education Cooperative, and agency foresters is also currently underway to deliver trainings and workshops focused on the Minnesota Forest Resources Council Forest Management Guidelines (FMGs). We plan to continue outreach to landowners, managers and loggers about monitoring results and opportunities to improve the implementation of guidelines and reduce water quality risks. We also plan to continue exploring ways in which statewide coverage of the canopy change analysis can feed into assessment of thresholds corresponding to varying levels of risk to water quality (WRAPS) and biodiversity (WHAF). A hydro-geomorphological risk model developed for the entire state will also be released along with appropriate guidance for its use in identifying and mitigating landscape risks through appropriate on-site BMP planning and implementation. The User’s Guide is currently near completion. Four full seasons of data collected using the new data entry system have been fully integrated with data collected since 2009 and will become available this year.   ",,,,,,,,,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2024,300000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(g)","$650,000 the first year and $650,000 the second year are for applied research and tools, including maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries, streams, and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data and for assessing the effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. "," In FY24 DNR will complete intensive field monitoring on ~100 timber harvest sites in eleven targeted watersheds in central and northern Minnesota. Aerial image acquisition and landowner contact and efforts to acquire permissions for access are currently underway. Coordination with Minnesota Logger Education Program, Sustainable Forestry Education Cooperative, and agency foresters is also currently underway to deliver trainings and workshops focused on the Minnesota Forest Resources Council Forest Management Guidelines (FMGs). We plan to continue outreach to landowners, managers and loggers about monitoring results and opportunities to improve the implementation of guidelines and reduce water quality risks. We also plan to continue exploring ways in which statewide coverage of the canopy change analysis can feed into assessment of thresholds corresponding to varying levels of risk to water quality (WRAPS) and biodiversity (WHAF). A hydro-geomorphological risk model developed for the entire state will also be released along with appropriate guidance for its use in identifying and mitigating landscape risks through appropriate on-site BMP planning and implementation. The User’s Guide is currently near completion. Four full seasons of data collected using the new data entry system have been fully integrated with data collected since 2009 and will become available this year. ","In FY24, DNR completed intensive field monitoring on 79 timber harvest sites in three targeted watersheds in northern and central Minnesota. Sampling monitored water quality best management practices (BMPs) and other sustainable forest management guidelines. Low private landowner interest and increased contracting costs ($30K+ increase over previous year) led to lower number of monitoring sites across watersheds. Our monitoring identified certain areas where further education is recommended, such as RMZs, filter strips, erosion control, and road and landing placements. Due to issues with data quality, sites may be re-measured in winter 2024 and spring 2025 to ensure data quality is available to create a 1-year report on watershed data in early 2025. A regional report inclusive of all surveyed watersheds over the last 5 years will be published in late 2025. The Guideline Monitoring Program also assisted with four logger education trainings collaborated with UMN Extension, MFRC, MLEP, and DNR held in central and northern areas of the state during FY24, with plans to expand trainings to all other parts of Minnesota over the next 2 years. ",,,,275556,,,1,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2023,250000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$535000 the first year and $530000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","DNR will complete intensive field monitoring on ~100 timber harvest sites in eleven targeted watersheds in central and southeastern Minnesota. Aerial image acquisition and landowner contact and efforts to acquire permissions for access are currently underway. Coordination with Minnesota Logger Education Program, Sustainable Forestry Education Cooperative, and agency foresters is also currently underway to deliver trainings and workshops focused on the Minnesota Forest Resources Council Forest Management Guidelines (FMGs). We plan to continue outreach to landowners, managers and loggers about monitoring results and opportunities to improve the implementation of guidelines and reduce water quality risks. We also plan to continue exploring ways in which statewide coverage of the canopy change analysis can feed into assessment of thresholds corresponding to varying levels of risk to water quality (WRAPS) and biodiversity (WHAF). A hydro-geomorphological risk model developed for the entire state will also be released along with appropriate guidance for its use in identifying and mitigating landscape risks through appropriate on-site BMP planning and implementation. The User’s Guide is currently near completion. Three full seasons of data collected using the new data entry system have been fully integrated with data collected since 2009 and will become available this year. "," In FY23 DNR completed intensive field monitoring on 70 timber harvest sites in ten targeted watersheds in central and southeastern Minnesota. Sampling was conducted proportionately to the number of timber harvests in each ownership class (County, Federal, Industry, NIPF, State, Tribal). We monitored water quality best management practice (BMP) and other sustainable forest management implementation. Lower private landowner participation and increased contracting costs resulted in a smaller than anticipated sample this year. Analysis of data collected in recent years of monitoring has allowed us to begin looking for spatial trends in BMP implementation and to deliver outreach to improve those trends. Examples include identification of watersheds where placement of infrastructure on top of filter strips has been observed, use of erosion control practices, trends in riparian management zone use, leave tree and coarse woody debris retention, and rutting on roads skid trails and approaches. A two-year report on watershed sample unit FMG implementation will be released in February of 2024. We also completed our first Forest Management Guideline (FMG) training with representatives from BWSR, MFRC, UMN, and DNR at the Cloquet Forestry Center as part of a restart of the guideline training program’s in-person events. ",,,,210369,5890,,1,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2022,250000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$535000 the first year and $530000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","DNR will complete intensive field monitoring on ~100 timber harvest sites in ten targeted watersheds in northern and central Minnesota. Aerial image acquisition and landowner contact and efforts to acquire permissions for access are currently underway. Coordination with Minnesota Logger Education Program Sustainable Forestry Education Cooperative and agency foresters is also currently underway to plan trainings and workshops focused on the Minnesota Forest Resources Council Forest Management Guidelines (FMGs). We plan to continue outreach to landowners managers and loggers about monitoring results and opportunities to improve the implementation of guidelines and reduce water quality risks to the extent possible given COVID-19 mitigation guidelines and restrictions. We plan to continue exploring ways in which statewide coverage of the canopy change analysis can feed into assessment of thresholds corresponding to varying levels of risk to water quality (WRAPS) and biodiversity (WHAF). A hydro-geomorphological risk model developed for the entire state will also be released along with appropriate guidance for its use in identifying and mitigating landscape risks through appropriate on-site BMP planning and implementation. The User's Guide is currently near completion. Two full seasons of data collected using the new data entry system are now available. This will allow GMP staff to complete a two-year report on watershed sample unit FMG implementation in early February of 2022. ","DNR completed intensive field monitoring on 75 timber harvest sites in ten targeted watersheds in northern and central Minnesota. Sampling was conducted proportionately to the number of timber harvests in each ownership class (County, Federal, Industry, NIPF, State, Tribal). We monitored water quality best management practice (BMP) and other sustainable forest management implementation. Lower private landowner participation and increased contracting costs resulted in a smaller than anticipated sample this year. During FY22, we further refined our new data entry system for GMP, utilizing ArcGIS Portal, Collector, and Survey123 for collection and storage of spatial and survey data related to monitored harvest sites. We also developed scripted data compilation and reporting methods using this new system. Analysis of data collected in recent years of monitoring has allowed us to begin looking for spatial trends in BMP implementation and to deliver outreach to improve those trends. Examples include identification of watersheds where placement of infrastructure on top of filter strips has been observed, use of erosion control practices, trends in riparian management zone use, leave tree and coarse woody debris retention, and rutting on roads skid trails and approaches. A two-year report on watershed sample unit FMG implementation was released in February of 2022. ",,,,244317,4773,,1,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2021,250000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","DNR will complete intensive field monitoring on ~100 timber harvest sites in seven targeted watersheds in northern and central Minnesota. Aerial image acquisition and landowner contact and efforts to acquire permissions for access are currently underway. Coordination with DNR Private Forest Management Foresters (PFM) to help us connect with private landowners and future workshops is in progress. We plan to continue outreach to landowners managers and loggers about monitoring results and opportunities to improve the implementation of guidelines and reduce water quality risks to the extent possible given COVID-19 mitigation guidelines and restrictions. We plan to continue exploring ways in which statewide coverage of the canopy change analysis can feed into assessment of thresholds corresponding to varying levels of risk to water quality (WRAPS) and biodiversity (WHAF). A hydrogeomorphological risk model developed for the entire state will also be released along with appropriate guidance for its use in identifying and mitigating landscape risks through appropriate on-site BMP planning and implementation. A full season of data collected using the new data entry system will become available allowing GMP staff to develop scripted methods to integrate new monitoring observations with historic data sets and begin providing site-level and watershed/ownership summary reports via the online reporting application described in FY20 Outcomes.","DNR completed intensive field monitoring on 92 timber harvest sites in seven targeted watersheds in northern and central Minnesota. Direct GMP contact with non-industrial private forest owners allowed us to achieve a good sample of this important demographic this year. We monitored water quality best management practice (BMP) and other sustainable forest management implementation. During FY21 we further refined our new data entry system for GMP utilizing ArcGIS Portal Collector and Survey123 for collection and storage of spatial and survey data related to monitored harvest sites. We also developed scripted data compilation and reporting methods using this new system. The Beta version of an online reporting application continues to contribute to summarization and reporting of monitoring results. Analysis of data collected in recent years of monitoring has allowed us to begin looking for spatial trends in BMP implementation and to deliver outreach to improve those trends. Examples include identification of watersheds where placement of infrastructure on top of filter strips has been observed use of erosion control practices trends in riparian management zone use leave tree and coarse woody debris retention and rutting on roads skid trails and approaches. We are currently working with MNIT to identify a hosting solution for the reporting application.",,,,260654,4540,,1.2,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2020,250000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","DNR will complete intensive field monitoring on ~100 timber harvest sites in five targeted watersheds in northern and central Minnesota. Aerial image acquisition and landowner contact and efforts to acquire permissions for access are currently underway. Coordination with DNR Private Forest Management Foresters (PFM) to help us connect with private landowners and future workshops is in progress. We have also begun exploring ways in which statewide coverage of the canopy change analysis can feed into assessment of thresholds corresponding to varying levels of risk to water quality (WRAPS) and biodiversity (WHAF). Testing and final deployment of the new data entry system is currently underway and will be completed by May 2020. Reporting for monitoring data collected in FY18-19 will be completed in FY20 and synthesis of data from the past cycle of monitoring will be made available to stakeholders in the form of written reports watershed maps interactive summaries targeted outreach and BMP training events. Analysis of data collected over the past five years of monitoring across the entire forested landscape has allowed us to begin looking for spatial trends in BMP implementation and to deliver outreach and training in an attempt to improve those trends. Examples include identification of: watersheds where placement of infrastructure on top of filter strips has been observed trends in riparian management zone use leave tree and coarse woody debris retention rutting on roads skid trails and approaches and other issues pertinent to water quality and other forest resources and will be completed in February 2020.","In FY20 DNR completed intensive field monitoring on 89 timber harvest sites in five targeted watersheds in northern and central Minnesota. Coordination with DNR Private Forest Management Foresters (PFM) helped us to connect with private landowners. We managed monitoring of water quality best management practice (BMP) and other sustainable forest management implementation. During FY20 we also completed testing and final deployment of a new data entry system for GMP utilizing ArcGIS Portal Collector and Survey123 for collection and storage of spatial and survey data related to monitored harvest sites. The Beta version of an online reporting application contributed substantially to summarization and reporting of monitoring results. Tabular reports from the application have contributed substantially to development of both the 2018 Guideline Monitoring Report and the 2014-2018 Summary Report. Analysis of data collected in recent years of monitoring has allowed us to begin looking for spatial trends in BMP implementation and to deliver outreach and training in an attempt to improve those trends. Examples include identification of watersheds where placement of infrastructure on top of filter strips has been observed trends in riparian management zone use leave tree and coarse woody debris retention and rutting on roads skid trails and approaches. ",,,,237786,3054,,0.6,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2019,250000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY19 the DNR will complete intensive field monitoring of 93 timber harvest sites in eight targeted watersheds in northern Minnesota. For these eight watersheds during the summer we will oversee monitoring of water quality best management practice (BMP) implementation and implementation of other sustainable forest management guidelines on 93 timber harvest sites. We will continue outreach to landowners managers and loggers. This work will include: 1) site-specific feedback about monitoring results and opportunities to improve the implementation of guidelines and reduce water quality risks; 2) working with DNR Private Forest Management foresters and Soil & Water Conservation Districts to develop strategies for outreach to private landowners in monitored watersheds; and 3) contributing to watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS) and watershed planning. Also in FY19 we will begin overhauling our Guideline Monitoring application. We will also review the past five years of monitoring which has covered the entire forested landscape looking for adverse trends and deliver outreach and training in an attempt to change those trends. ","DNR completed intensive field monitoring of 83 timber harvest sites in eight targeted watersheds in northern Minnesota. For these eight watersheds we managed monitoring of water quality best management practice (BMP) and other sustainable forest management implementation. We continued outreach to landowners managers and loggers including: 1) site-specific feedback about monitoring results and opportunities to improve the implementation of guidelines and reduce water quality risks; 2) working with DNR Private Forest Management foresters and Soil & Water Conservation Districts to develop strategies for outreach to private landowners in monitored watersheds; and 3) contributing to watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS) and watershed planning. Additional work was coordinated with researchers at the University of Minnesota Department of Forest Resources to manage our field data compile historic trends and develop a Beta version of an online reporting application capable of summarizing data collected by the Program since 2009. The reporting application uses a selected set of thematic filters including watershed sample units MFRC landscape regions counties and land ownership to summarize monitoring results. Reporting is provided in tabular form consistent with recent written reports. Additional spatial analyses relating land use forest cover and hydrologic features on a watershed sample unit basis are also made available.",,,,232858,,,,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2018,250000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY18 the DNR will complete intensive field monitoring of 98 timber harvest sites in nine targeted watersheds in northern Minnesota. We will also analyze the distribution of timber harvest and forest change on forest land in eight northern Minnesota watersheds. For these eight watersheds during the summer we will oversee monitoring of water quality best management practice (BMP) implementation and implementation of other sustainable forest management guideline on 80 to 100 timber harvest sites. We will continue activities to reach out to forest landowners managers and loggers including: - Site-specific feedback about monitoring results and opportunities to improve the implementation of guidelines and reduce water quality risks. - Working with DNR Private Forest Management foresters and Soil & Water Conservation Districts to develop strategies for outreach to small private landowners in monitored watersheds. - Contributing to developing strategies for the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies process in forested watersheds. In February we will submit our biennial Guideline Implementation Monitoring Report to the MN Forest Resource Council (MFRC). The report will summarize results from implementation monitoring on 169 sites in 19 watersheds during the summer and fall of FY16 and FY17. DNR and MFRC staff will use this information to continue identifying water quality risk factors and developing strategies to reduce risks in targeted watersheds.","In FY18 the DNR completed intensive field monitoring of 98 timber harvest sites in nine targeted watersheds in northern Minnesota and began monitoring water quality best management practice (BMP) implementation and implementation of other sustainable forest management guidelines on 93 timber harvest sites in northern Minnesota. In February 2018 we submitted our biennial Guideline Implementation Monitoring Report to the MN Forest Resource Council (MFRC). The report summarized results from implementation monitoring of 169 sites in 19 watersheds during the summer and fall of FY16 and FY17. DNR and MFRC staff use this information to continue identifying water quality risk factors and developing strategies to reduce risks in targeted watersheds and presented this information at several venues in FY18. They also shared results with landowners and land managers whose sites were monitored and helped them identify opportunities to better implement guidelines and reduce water quality risks. DNR Private Forest Management Foresters helped us connect with private land owners to improve access for monitoring private forest lands and pave the way for future workshops to improve the implementation of guidelines and water quality BMPs.",,,,170093,,,0.1,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2017,250000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY17 the DNR will complete intensive field monitoring of 80 timber harvest sites in 12 targeted watersheds in central and southeastern Minnesota. We will analyze the distribution of timber harvest and forest change on forestland in 38 forested watersheds across the state in order to select 10 watersheds for additional intensive monitoring of timber harvest sites. For these 10 watersheds we will execute a contract to begin monitoring the implementation of water quality best management practices (BMPs) and other sustainable forest management guidelines on 80 to 100 timber harvest sites.","In FY17 the DNR completed intensive field monitoring of 80 timber harvest sites in 12 targeted watersheds in central and southeastern Minnesota and identified 100 additional timber harvest sites in nine forested watersheds for intensive monitoring to be completed in FY18. We also analyzed the distribution of timber harvest and forest change on 38 selected major watersheds in northern Minnesota while developing focused information on nine target watersheds. The resulting information documents how well water quality best management practices (BMPs) and other sustainable forest management guidelines have been implemented. Staff also continued using this information to identify water quality risk factors and develop strategies to reduce risks in targeted watersheds. They presented this information at several venues. They also shared results with landowners and land managers whose sites were monitored and helped them identify opportunities to better implement guidelines and reduce water quality risks. Staff utilized the DNR’s Private Forest Management Foresters to better connect with small private land owners to improve access to monitoring private forest lands and to pave the way for future workshops addressing ways to improve the implementation of guidelines and water quality BMPs.",,,,186321,,,0.9,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2016,250000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY16 the DNR will identify the distribution of timber harvest and forest change on 12 selected HUC8 watershed units (see below). The DNR will check logging sites to make sure sustainable forest management guidelines and water quality BMPs are properly carried out. We will look at specific watershed characteristics to identify water quality risk factors on the selected areas and we will develop strategies to reduce risks in the targeted watersheds. We will continue and further develop outreach to forest landowners managers and loggers to implement strategies including: -A comprehensive report on sustainable forest management guideline implementation -Continued site-specific feedback to land owners/managers and loggers of sites monitored during summer of 2014 and 2015. Feedback will address results of site monitoring and identification of opportunities for improvement of guideline implementation and water quality risk reduction -Work with the recently rebuilt Cooperative Forest Management Program to better connect with small private forest land owners -Continued interaction and contribution to Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies Work with the Minnesota Forest Recourses Council (MFRC) Region Landscape Planning program to address the risk factors that were identified in the watershed analyses and to improve how BMPs are carried out.","In FY16 the DNR completed intensive field monitoring on 79 timber harvest sites in seven northern Minnesota watersheds and identified 80 additional timber harvest sites in 12 central and southeastern Minnesota watersheds for intensive monitoring to be done in FY17. The resulting information documents how well water quality best management practices (BMPs) and other sustainable forest management guidelines have been implemented. Staff completed a comprehensive report on sites monitored in calendar years 2014 and 2015 available at http://mn.gov/frc/site-level-forest-management-reports.html. Staff continued to use information from these reports to identify water quality risk factors and develop strategies to reduce risks in targeted watersheds. They presented this information at several venues. They shared results with landowners and land managers whose sites were monitored and helped them identify opportunities to better implement guidelines and reduce water quality risks. DNR Cooperative Forest Management foresters collaborated with Soil & Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs) to better connect with small private landowners in targeted watersheds improving access to monitoring sites and paving the way for workshops on improved implementation of guidelines. Staff worked with the Minnesota Logger Education Program to develop this type of workshop for logging professionals. Staff collaborated with the Minnesota Forest Resources Council on strategies for outreach and education to improve implementation of guidelines and aid the development of regional landscape plans. Finally staff continued to contribute information from reports to the development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS).",,,,217597,,,0.9,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2015,250000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY 15 the DNR will detect where timber harvest and other forest changes took place on all forested watersheds statewide. We will monitor the implementation of sustainable forest management guidelines and water quality BMPs on timber harvest sites across the four watersheds selected in FY14 and an additional seven selected in FY15. The combined information along with specific watershed characteristics will be used to identify water quality risk factors (based on timber harvesting frequency and distribution level of BMP implementation and additional watershed characteristics) within target watersheds for FY14 &15. We will develop strategies to reduce risks in the targeted watersheds. We will develop outreach programs geared toward implementing those strategies for forest landowners managers and loggers. These programs will include: 1) workshops addressing erosion control on forest access roads and timber harvesting sites; 2) feedback to land managers and loggers of sites monitored in FY14 (results of site monitoring and identifying opportunities for improvement) 3) a BMP field manual for loggers and land managers.","In FY 15 the DNR identified that forests were disturbed in a total of 38 watersheds (HUC 8) and 27 counties in Minnesota. We selected 80 harvest sites in a subset of seven watersheds for monitoring the implementation of sustainable forest management guidelines and water quality BMPs.* We hired contractors to collect monitoring data which we will analyze in FY16. We also completed field monitoring at an additional 59 sites that were started in FY2014 sites in the Mississippi Headwaters Rum River Lake Superior South and Lake Superior North watersheds. We synthesized data for these sites and evaluated them for guideline compliance. We presented the information to various groups (see below). The final report will be done in February of 2016. In collaboration with the University of Minnesota and the Minnesota Logger Education Program we conducted two workshops addressing erosion control on forest access roads and timber harvesting sites in fall/winter of 2014. We also made several presentations to disseminate Guideline Monitoring results including talking to land managers at the monitoring sites in an ongoing process providing feedback. We also helped develop a BMP field manual for loggers and land managers. We evaluated forest disturbance/change between the years 2000 to 2015 on all forested watersheds in Minnesota. We looked at specific watershed characteristics to identify water quality risk factors including: proximity of forest disturbances to water features roads and road crossings; soil drainage type texture and erodibility; current and past land cover and land use change; and topographic characteristics (slope flow direction and accumulation). We used these data layers along with several from the DNR’s Watershed Health Assessment Framework to create a preliminary risk index.",,,,171589,,,1.0,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
20536,"Forestry Best Management Practices for Clean Water",2014,250000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY 14 DNR will monitor the implementation of sustainable forest management guidelines and water quality BMPs on 80 – 100 timber harvest sites across 4 forested watersheds. Distribution of timber harvest and other forest changes will also be identified in these watersheds. The combined information along with specific watershed characteristics will be used to identify water quality risk factors within target watersheds and strategies to reduce those risks. Outreach programs will then be developed to work with forest landowners managers and loggers to implement strategies. Specific outcomes include: -Establishment of a protocol for identifying forest change at the watershed level that can also be applied statewide. -Identify the distribution of timber harvest and forest change in four watersheds including Mississippi Headwaters Rum River North Lake Superior and South Lake Superior. -Monitor the implementation of forest management guidelines and water quality BMPs through on-site investigation on a total of 80-100 sites across these 4 watersheds. -Progress in development of a protocol for identifying level of risk to water quality due to timber harvesting frequency and distribution level of BMP implementation and additional watershed characteristics Outreach programs based on above data will be developed in FY15.","In FY14 DNR foresters identified the distribution of timber harvest and forest change in four watersheds: Mississippi Headwaters Rum River Lake Superior South and Lake Superior North. DNR established a protocol for identifying forest change at the watershed level; this protocol will be refined to better differentiate among various forest change types. For example some partial harvesting is difficult to distinguish from wind damage. Also time sequence is required to detect difference between forest harvesting and some land conversions such as pasturing. In the four target watersheds foresters monitored 34 sites for implementation of forest management guidelines and water quality best management practices. About 1/3 of the sites planned for monitoring in FY14 were completed; the remainder will be completed by Sept 31 2014. Contract work was delayed due to length of time required to get contract approvals. DNR is also developing a protocol for identifying level of risk to water quality due to timber harvesting frequency and distribution level of BMP implementation and additional watershed characteristics. The primary progress on this task was hiring a Research Analysis Specialist whose responsibilities will be focused development of this protocol. The hiring process was completed in early FY15 and significant progress will be made on this protocol in the coming year. Outreach development in FY14 included curriculum and video development for erosion control workshops to be held in the fall of 2014 and help creating a user-friendly field guide focused on forestry water quality BMPs which will be completed in FY15.",,,,41296,,,0.1,,,"The Minnesota DNR and the Minnesota Forest Resources Council work with forest landowners, managers and loggers to implement a set of voluntary sustainable forest management guidelines that include water quality best management practices (BMPs) to ensure sustainable habitat, clean water, and productive forest soils, all contributing to healthy watersheds. This project will monitor the implementation of these forest management guidelines and BMPs on forested watersheds in MN. Additionally, this project will identify timber harvest frequency and distribution as well as significant change to forest area including conversion of forests to other land uses, large fires, and blowdown events. An evaluation of the guideline implementation rates, watershed characteristics, and the frequency and distribution of forest change will be used to identify risks to water quality as well as strategies to reduce these risks, with the goal of maintaining high quality forested watersheds in MN. Outreach programs will be developed for forest landowners, managers and loggers throughout the target watersheds aimed at mitigating these risks such as improved implementation of specific BMPs. ","Forested watersheds in MN generally produce an abundance of high quality water. Much of our forested landscape is managed as productive forest land providing timber products as well recreational opportunities and abundant wildlife. Sustainable timber harvesting in combination with application of voluntary water quality BMP's has helped to maintain water quality in Minnesota's managed forest lands. However, risks to water quality in these landscapes still remain, with rates of BMP implementation, harvesting patterns, and watershed characteristics influencing the potential for impacts to occur at any given time or place. Also, recent trends in forestland development and loss in Minnesota has increased the risk of impacts to water quality in forested landscapes. Evaluation of BMP implementation and quantification of risk factors by watershed, combined with effective outreach programs, will allow for continued utilization of working forests while maintaining functioning, healthy watersheds that produce clean water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lila,Westreich,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","St. Paul",MN,55155,,lila.westreich@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Cook, Crow Wing, Fillmore, Goodhue, Houston, Hubbard, Isanti, Itasca, Kanabec, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Olmsted, Otter Tail, Pine, Roseau, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Winona",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forestry-best-management-practices-clean-water,,,,
10006530,"Forever Green Initiative",2025,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (h) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are for grants to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to fund the Forever Green agriculture initiative and to protect the state's natural resources while increasing the efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers by incorporating perennial and winter-annual crops into existing agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. ",,"Twenty-five research projects which focus on incorporating perennial and winter annual crops into existing agricultural practices were selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects ",,,,,,,,,"Public College/University","Forever Green Initiative develops perennial and cover cropping systems specific to Minnesota that are necessary to protect and restore the state's surface and groundwater resources while increasing efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers. The Forever Green Initiative brings together researchers from multiple departments including plant breeding, agronomy, food science, and economics. The goal is to develop new high value commodity crops for conservation purposes. Many of these new crops could fit into a corn and soybean rotation by providing ground cover after harvest and before next spring's emergence. Winter annuals and cover crops grow between the time when annual crops are harvested in the fall and a new planting is established in the spring. This is the time when fields are bare, and most vulnerable to erosion and nutrient loss. In addition, perennials provide valuable groundcover and related environmental benefits throughout the year. Current crop research includes: The Forever Green Initiative works on 13 different crops. Crops that are closest to market ready include Intermediate Wheatgrass (Kernza),Camelina (oil and protein), Hazelnuts (oil, protein, fresh nuts), Pennycress (oil and protein), Perennial flax (oil, protein, and ornamental hedge), and Elderberry.  Clean Water funding supports Forever Green research, implementation, and program coordination. Funding for implementation and program coordination began in fiscal year 2020. ","There is general agreement that increasing the adoption of vegetative cover (cover crops, winter annuals, and perennials) has the capacity to provide significant surface and ground water quality and climate change benefits, however there are still significant barriers. Specifically, winter hardy plant material and viable markets for these crops are not broadly available or they are not economically viable. Efforts of the Forever Green Initiative brings together research on crop development, agronomy, food science, environmental impact, commercialization, and market development to advance this next generation of crops. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) receives Clean Water Funds to support the Forever Green Agricultural Initiative at the University of Minnesota. All funding is passed through to the University of Minnesota. The MDA oversees the distribution of funds and coordinates reporting on progress results and outcomes. Since 2016, there have been 76 projects funded by the Clean Water Fund and 9 projects funded by General Funds. Research projects are selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. A list of new crop research projects by biennium can be found on the MDA's Forever Green Initiative website. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects 2022-2023 Forever Green Projects 2020-2021 Forever Green Projects 2018-2019 Forever Green Projects 2017 Forever Green Projects 2016 Forever Green Projects ",2016-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6488,Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forever-green-initiative,,,,
10006530,"Forever Green Initiative",2024,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (h) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are for grants to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to fund the Forever Green agriculture initiative and to protect the state's natural resources while increasing the efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers by incorporating perennial and winter-annual crops into existing agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of Forever Green Institute (FGI) projects funded Number of FGI acres implemented Number of FGI acres implemented in Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMAs) Number of farmers growing Kernza Pounds of MN-grown Kernza distributed to business Number of Minnesota businesses who received Kernza (for market development) Dollars leveraged (non-CWF funding including state federal, foundations, industry, and the U of M) ","Twenty-five research projects which focus on incorporating perennial and winter annual crops into existing agricultural practices were selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University. These projects are funded with the FY24-25 appropriation. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects Total enrolled acres in the 2023/24 growing season were as follows: Hybrid winter rye: 801 Winter Camelina: 1236.5 Winter Barley: 10 Kernza: 366 Current number of farms that have signed up for the Environmental and Economic Clusters of Opportunity (EECO) program for 2024/2025 Winter camelina: 33 Hybrid winter rye: 26 Kernza: 11 Winter Barley: 2 ",,4450914,,1923021,,,,,"Public College/University","Forever Green Initiative develops perennial and cover cropping systems specific to Minnesota that are necessary to protect and restore the state's surface and groundwater resources while increasing efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers. The Forever Green Initiative brings together researchers from multiple departments including plant breeding, agronomy, food science, and economics. The goal is to develop new high value commodity crops for conservation purposes. Many of these new crops could fit into a corn and soybean rotation by providing ground cover after harvest and before next spring's emergence. Winter annuals and cover crops grow between the time when annual crops are harvested in the fall and a new planting is established in the spring. This is the time when fields are bare, and most vulnerable to erosion and nutrient loss. In addition, perennials provide valuable groundcover and related environmental benefits throughout the year. Current crop research includes: The Forever Green Initiative works on 13 different crops. Crops that are closest to market ready include Intermediate Wheatgrass (Kernza),Camelina (oil and protein), Hazelnuts (oil, protein, fresh nuts), Pennycress (oil and protein), Perennial flax (oil, protein, and ornamental hedge), and Elderberry.  Clean Water funding supports Forever Green research, implementation, and program coordination. Funding for implementation and program coordination began in fiscal year 2020. ","There is general agreement that increasing the adoption of vegetative cover (cover crops, winter annuals, and perennials) has the capacity to provide significant surface and ground water quality and climate change benefits, however there are still significant barriers. Specifically, winter hardy plant material and viable markets for these crops are not broadly available or they are not economically viable. Efforts of the Forever Green Initiative brings together research on crop development, agronomy, food science, environmental impact, commercialization, and market development to advance this next generation of crops. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) receives Clean Water Funds to support the Forever Green Agricultural Initiative at the University of Minnesota. All funding is passed through to the University of Minnesota. The MDA oversees the distribution of funds and coordinates reporting on progress results and outcomes. Since 2016, there have been 76 projects funded by the Clean Water Fund and 9 projects funded by General Funds. Research projects are selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. A list of new crop research projects by biennium can be found on the MDA's Forever Green Initiative website. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects 2022-2023 Forever Green Projects 2020-2021 Forever Green Projects 2018-2019 Forever Green Projects 2017 Forever Green Projects 2016 Forever Green Projects ",2016-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6488,Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forever-green-initiative,,,,
10006530,"Forever Green Initiative",2023,2000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(h) $2,000,000 the first year and $2,000,000 the second year are for grants to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to fund the Forever Green agriculture initiative and to protect the state's natural resources while increasing the efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers by incorporating perennial and winter-annual crops into existing agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of Forever Green Institute (FGI) projects funded Number of FGI acres implemented Number of FGI acres implemented in Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMAs) Number of farmers growing Kernza Pounds of MN-grown Kernza distributed to business Number of Minnesota businesses who received Kernza (for market development) Dollars leveraged (non-CWF funding including state federal, foundations, industry, and the U of M) ",,,21197180,,1783346,,,,,"Public College/University","Forever Green Initiative develops perennial and cover cropping systems specific to Minnesota that are necessary to protect and restore the state's surface and groundwater resources while increasing efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers. The Forever Green Initiative brings together researchers from multiple departments including plant breeding, agronomy, food science, and economics. The goal is to develop new high value commodity crops for conservation purposes. Many of these new crops could fit into a corn and soybean rotation by providing ground cover after harvest and before next spring's emergence. Winter annuals and cover crops grow between the time when annual crops are harvested in the fall and a new planting is established in the spring. This is the time when fields are bare, and most vulnerable to erosion and nutrient loss. In addition, perennials provide valuable groundcover and related environmental benefits throughout the year. Current crop research includes: The Forever Green Initiative works on 13 different crops. Crops that are closest to market ready include Intermediate Wheatgrass (Kernza),Camelina (oil and protein), Hazelnuts (oil, protein, fresh nuts), Pennycress (oil and protein), Perennial flax (oil, protein, and ornamental hedge), and Elderberry.  Clean Water funding supports Forever Green research, implementation, and program coordination. Funding for implementation and program coordination began in fiscal year 2020. ","There is general agreement that increasing the adoption of vegetative cover (cover crops, winter annuals, and perennials) has the capacity to provide significant surface and ground water quality and climate change benefits, however there are still significant barriers. Specifically, winter hardy plant material and viable markets for these crops are not broadly available or they are not economically viable. Efforts of the Forever Green Initiative brings together research on crop development, agronomy, food science, environmental impact, commercialization, and market development to advance this next generation of crops. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) receives Clean Water Funds to support the Forever Green Agricultural Initiative at the University of Minnesota. All funding is passed through to the University of Minnesota. The MDA oversees the distribution of funds and coordinates reporting on progress results and outcomes. Since 2016, there have been 76 projects funded by the Clean Water Fund and 9 projects funded by General Funds. Research projects are selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. A list of new crop research projects by biennium can be found on the MDA's Forever Green Initiative website. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects 2022-2023 Forever Green Projects 2020-2021 Forever Green Projects 2018-2019 Forever Green Projects 2017 Forever Green Projects 2016 Forever Green Projects ",2016-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6488,Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forever-green-initiative,,,,
10006530,"Forever Green Initiative",2022,2000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(h) $2,000,000 the first year and $2,000,000 the second year are for grants to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to fund the Forever Green agriculture initiative and to protect the state's natural resources while increasing the efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers by incorporating perennial and winter-annual crops into existing agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of Forever Green Institute (FGI) projects funded Number of FGI acres implemented Number of FGI acres implemented in Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMAs) Number of farmers growing Kernza Pounds of MN-grown Kernza distributed to business Number of Minnesota businesses who received Kernza (for market development) Dollars leveraged (non-CWF funding including state federal, foundations, industry, and the U of M) ","FY22-23 dollars supported fourteen projects which focus on incorporating perennial and winter annual crops into existing agricultural practices were selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. Additional project information for these thirteen projects and previous projects, can be found on the MDA's Forever Green website. Implementation: Over 1,500 acres are implemented (Kernza) (2019-2020) 378 (32%) acres are implemented in Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (2019-2020) 33 farmers are growing Kernza (2020) 600,000 lbs Kernza harvested in 2021 25 businesses have received Kernza for market development (2020) FGI crops that are nearing readiness for increased planting acres and commercial scaling has expanded from Kernza to several winter annuals including winter camelina, winter barley, and hybrid winter rye, ",,1660000,,1280928,,,,,"Public College/University","Forever Green Initiative develops perennial and cover cropping systems specific to Minnesota that are necessary to protect and restore the state's surface and groundwater resources while increasing efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers. The Forever Green Initiative brings together researchers from multiple departments including plant breeding, agronomy, food science, and economics. The goal is to develop new high value commodity crops for conservation purposes. Many of these new crops could fit into a corn and soybean rotation by providing ground cover after harvest and before next spring's emergence. Winter annuals and cover crops grow between the time when annual crops are harvested in the fall and a new planting is established in the spring. This is the time when fields are bare, and most vulnerable to erosion and nutrient loss. In addition, perennials provide valuable groundcover and related environmental benefits throughout the year. Current crop research includes: The Forever Green Initiative works on 13 different crops. Crops that are closest to market ready include Intermediate Wheatgrass (Kernza),Camelina (oil and protein), Hazelnuts (oil, protein, fresh nuts), Pennycress (oil and protein), Perennial flax (oil, protein, and ornamental hedge), and Elderberry.  Clean Water funding supports Forever Green research, implementation, and program coordination. Funding for implementation and program coordination began in fiscal year 2020. ","There is general agreement that increasing the adoption of vegetative cover (cover crops, winter annuals, and perennials) has the capacity to provide significant surface and ground water quality and climate change benefits, however there are still significant barriers. Specifically, winter hardy plant material and viable markets for these crops are not broadly available or they are not economically viable. Efforts of the Forever Green Initiative brings together research on crop development, agronomy, food science, environmental impact, commercialization, and market development to advance this next generation of crops. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) receives Clean Water Funds to support the Forever Green Agricultural Initiative at the University of Minnesota. All funding is passed through to the University of Minnesota. The MDA oversees the distribution of funds and coordinates reporting on progress results and outcomes. Since 2016, there have been 76 projects funded by the Clean Water Fund and 9 projects funded by General Funds. Research projects are selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. A list of new crop research projects by biennium can be found on the MDA's Forever Green Initiative website. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects 2022-2023 Forever Green Projects 2020-2021 Forever Green Projects 2018-2019 Forever Green Projects 2017 Forever Green Projects 2016 Forever Green Projects ",2016-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6488,Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forever-green-initiative,,,,
10006530,"Forever Green Initiative",2021,2000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (h) $2,300,000 the first year and $2,000,000 the second year are for grants to fund the Forever Green Agriculture Initiative and to protect the state's natural resources while increasing the efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers by incorporating perennial and winter-annual crops into existing agricultural practices. Of this amount, $2,050,000 the first year and $1,750,000 the second year are for grants to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for research and establishing an Agricultural Diversification Steering Council and Network and $250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for grants to implement Forever Green crops or cropping systems. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of Forever Green Institute (FGI) projects funded Number of FGI acres implemented Number of FGI acres implemented in Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMAs) Number of farmers growing Kernza Pounds of MN-grown Kernza distributed to business Number of Minnesota businesses who received Kernza (for market development) Dollars leveraged (non-CWF funding including state federal, foundations, industry, and the U of M) ","FY20-21 dollars supported thirteen projects which focus on incorporating perennial and winter annual crops into existing agricultural practices were selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. Additional project information for these thirteen projects and previous projects, can be found on the MDA's Forever Green website. Implementation: 1,162 acres are implemented (Kernza) (2019-2020) 378 acres are implemented in DWSMAs (2019-2020) 33 farmers are growing Kernza (2020) 1,600 lbs of Kernza distributed to businesses in Minnesota, about 4,500 lbs nationwide (2019-2020) 25 businesses have received Kernza for market development (2020) $70,495,700 have been leveraged (2016-2020) ",,800000,,1107979,,,,,"Public College/University","Forever Green Initiative develops perennial and cover cropping systems specific to Minnesota that are necessary to protect and restore the state's surface and groundwater resources while increasing efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers. The Forever Green Initiative brings together researchers from multiple departments including plant breeding, agronomy, food science, and economics. The goal is to develop new high value commodity crops for conservation purposes. Many of these new crops could fit into a corn and soybean rotation by providing ground cover after harvest and before next spring's emergence. Winter annuals and cover crops grow between the time when annual crops are harvested in the fall and a new planting is established in the spring. This is the time when fields are bare, and most vulnerable to erosion and nutrient loss. In addition, perennials provide valuable groundcover and related environmental benefits throughout the year. Current crop research includes: The Forever Green Initiative works on 13 different crops. Crops that are closest to market ready include Intermediate Wheatgrass (Kernza),Camelina (oil and protein), Hazelnuts (oil, protein, fresh nuts), Pennycress (oil and protein), Perennial flax (oil, protein, and ornamental hedge), and Elderberry.  Clean Water funding supports Forever Green research, implementation, and program coordination. Funding for implementation and program coordination began in fiscal year 2020. ","There is general agreement that increasing the adoption of vegetative cover (cover crops, winter annuals, and perennials) has the capacity to provide significant surface and ground water quality and climate change benefits, however there are still significant barriers. Specifically, winter hardy plant material and viable markets for these crops are not broadly available or they are not economically viable. Efforts of the Forever Green Initiative brings together research on crop development, agronomy, food science, environmental impact, commercialization, and market development to advance this next generation of crops. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) receives Clean Water Funds to support the Forever Green Agricultural Initiative at the University of Minnesota. All funding is passed through to the University of Minnesota. The MDA oversees the distribution of funds and coordinates reporting on progress results and outcomes. Since 2016, there have been 76 projects funded by the Clean Water Fund and 9 projects funded by General Funds. Research projects are selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. A list of new crop research projects by biennium can be found on the MDA's Forever Green Initiative website. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects 2022-2023 Forever Green Projects 2020-2021 Forever Green Projects 2018-2019 Forever Green Projects 2017 Forever Green Projects 2016 Forever Green Projects ",2016-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6488,Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forever-green-initiative,,,,
10006530,"Forever Green Initiative",2020,2300000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (h) $2,300,000 the first year and $2,000,000 the second year are for grants to fund the Forever Green Agriculture Initiative and to protect the state's natural resources while increasing the efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers by incorporating perennial and winter-annual crops into existing agricultural practices. Of this amount, $2,050,000 the first year and $1,750,000 the second year are for grants to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota for research and establishing an Agricultural Diversification Steering Council and Network and $250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for grants to implement Forever Green crops or cropping systems. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of Forever Green Institute (FGI) projects funded Number of FGI acres implemented Number of FGI acres implemented in Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMAs) Number of farmers growing Kernza Pounds of MN-grown Kernza distributed to business Number of Minnesota businesses who received Kernza (for market development) Dollars leveraged (non-CWF funding including state federal, foundations, industry, and the U of M) ","FY20-21 dollars supported thirteen projects which focus on incorporating perennial and winter annual crops into existing agricultural practices were selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. Additional project information for these thirteen projects and previous projects, can be found on the MDA's Forever Green website. 1,162 acres are implemented (Kernza) (2019-2020) 378 acres are implemented in DWSMAs (2019-2020) 33 farmers are growing Kernza (2020) 1,600 lbs of Kernza distributed to businesses in Minnesota, about 4,500 lbs nationwide (2019-2020) 25 businesses have received Kernza for market development (2020) $70,495,700 have been leveraged (2016-2020) ",,21830579,,468799,,,,,"Public College/University","Forever Green Initiative develops perennial and cover cropping systems specific to Minnesota that are necessary to protect and restore the state's surface and groundwater resources while increasing efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers. The Forever Green Initiative brings together researchers from multiple departments including plant breeding, agronomy, food science, and economics. The goal is to develop new high value commodity crops for conservation purposes. Many of these new crops could fit into a corn and soybean rotation by providing ground cover after harvest and before next spring's emergence. Winter annuals and cover crops grow between the time when annual crops are harvested in the fall and a new planting is established in the spring. This is the time when fields are bare, and most vulnerable to erosion and nutrient loss. In addition, perennials provide valuable groundcover and related environmental benefits throughout the year. Current crop research includes: The Forever Green Initiative works on 13 different crops. Crops that are closest to market ready include Intermediate Wheatgrass (Kernza),Camelina (oil and protein), Hazelnuts (oil, protein, fresh nuts), Pennycress (oil and protein), Perennial flax (oil, protein, and ornamental hedge), and Elderberry.  Clean Water funding supports Forever Green research, implementation, and program coordination. Funding for implementation and program coordination began in fiscal year 2020. ","There is general agreement that increasing the adoption of vegetative cover (cover crops, winter annuals, and perennials) has the capacity to provide significant surface and ground water quality and climate change benefits, however there are still significant barriers. Specifically, winter hardy plant material and viable markets for these crops are not broadly available or they are not economically viable. Efforts of the Forever Green Initiative brings together research on crop development, agronomy, food science, environmental impact, commercialization, and market development to advance this next generation of crops. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) receives Clean Water Funds to support the Forever Green Agricultural Initiative at the University of Minnesota. All funding is passed through to the University of Minnesota. The MDA oversees the distribution of funds and coordinates reporting on progress results and outcomes. Since 2016, there have been 76 projects funded by the Clean Water Fund and 9 projects funded by General Funds. Research projects are selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. A list of new crop research projects by biennium can be found on the MDA's Forever Green Initiative website. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects 2022-2023 Forever Green Projects 2020-2021 Forever Green Projects 2018-2019 Forever Green Projects 2017 Forever Green Projects 2016 Forever Green Projects ",2016-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6488,Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forever-green-initiative,,,,
10006530,"Forever Green Initiative",2019,750000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (i) $750,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are for grants to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to fund the Forever Green Agriculture Initiative and to protect the state's natural resources while increasing the efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers by incorporating perennial and winter-annual crops into existing agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ",,"FY18-19 dollars supported thirteen projects which focus on incorporating perennial and winter annual crops into existing agricultural practices were selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. Additional project information for these thirteen projects and previous projects, can be found on the MDA's Forever Green website. ",,31523832,"The Forever Green Initiative is supported by multiple sources including state and federal grants as well as investments from companies, foundations, and commodity groups ",562320,,,,,"Public College/University","Forever Green Initiative develops perennial and cover cropping systems specific to Minnesota that are necessary to protect and restore the state's surface and groundwater resources while increasing efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers. The Forever Green Initiative brings together researchers from multiple departments including plant breeding, agronomy, food science, and economics. The goal is to develop new high value commodity crops for conservation purposes. Many of these new crops could fit into a corn and soybean rotation by providing ground cover after harvest and before next spring's emergence. Winter annuals and cover crops grow between the time when annual crops are harvested in the fall and a new planting is established in the spring. This is the time when fields are bare, and most vulnerable to erosion and nutrient loss. In addition, perennials provide valuable groundcover and related environmental benefits throughout the year. Current crop research includes: The Forever Green Initiative works on 13 different crops. Crops that are closest to market ready include Intermediate Wheatgrass (Kernza),Camelina (oil and protein), Hazelnuts (oil, protein, fresh nuts), Pennycress (oil and protein), Perennial flax (oil, protein, and ornamental hedge), and Elderberry.  Clean Water funding supports Forever Green research, implementation, and program coordination. Funding for implementation and program coordination began in fiscal year 2020. ","There is general agreement that increasing the adoption of vegetative cover (cover crops, winter annuals, and perennials) has the capacity to provide significant surface and ground water quality and climate change benefits, however there are still significant barriers. Specifically, winter hardy plant material and viable markets for these crops are not broadly available or they are not economically viable. Efforts of the Forever Green Initiative brings together research on crop development, agronomy, food science, environmental impact, commercialization, and market development to advance this next generation of crops. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) receives Clean Water Funds to support the Forever Green Agricultural Initiative at the University of Minnesota. All funding is passed through to the University of Minnesota. The MDA oversees the distribution of funds and coordinates reporting on progress results and outcomes. Since 2016, there have been 76 projects funded by the Clean Water Fund and 9 projects funded by General Funds. Research projects are selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. A list of new crop research projects by biennium can be found on the MDA's Forever Green Initiative website. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects 2022-2023 Forever Green Projects 2020-2021 Forever Green Projects 2018-2019 Forever Green Projects 2017 Forever Green Projects 2016 Forever Green Projects ",2016-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6488,Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forever-green-initiative,,,,
10006530,"Forever Green Initiative",2018,750000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (i) $750,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are for grants to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to fund the Forever Green Agriculture Initiative and to protect the state's natural resources while increasing the efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers by incorporating perennial and winter-annual crops into existing agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ",,"FY18-19 dollars supported thirteen projects which focus on incorporating perennial and winter annual crops into existing agricultural practices were selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. Additional project information for these thirteen projects and previous projects, can be found on the MDA's Forever Green website. ",,7135195,"The Forever Green Initiative is supported by multiple sources including state and federal grants as well as investments from companies, foundations, and commodity groups. ",473142,,,,,"Public College/University","Forever Green Initiative develops perennial and cover cropping systems specific to Minnesota that are necessary to protect and restore the state's surface and groundwater resources while increasing efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers. The Forever Green Initiative brings together researchers from multiple departments including plant breeding, agronomy, food science, and economics. The goal is to develop new high value commodity crops for conservation purposes. Many of these new crops could fit into a corn and soybean rotation by providing ground cover after harvest and before next spring's emergence. Winter annuals and cover crops grow between the time when annual crops are harvested in the fall and a new planting is established in the spring. This is the time when fields are bare, and most vulnerable to erosion and nutrient loss. In addition, perennials provide valuable groundcover and related environmental benefits throughout the year. Current crop research includes: The Forever Green Initiative works on 13 different crops. Crops that are closest to market ready include Intermediate Wheatgrass (Kernza),Camelina (oil and protein), Hazelnuts (oil, protein, fresh nuts), Pennycress (oil and protein), Perennial flax (oil, protein, and ornamental hedge), and Elderberry.  Clean Water funding supports Forever Green research, implementation, and program coordination. Funding for implementation and program coordination began in fiscal year 2020. ","There is general agreement that increasing the adoption of vegetative cover (cover crops, winter annuals, and perennials) has the capacity to provide significant surface and ground water quality and climate change benefits, however there are still significant barriers. Specifically, winter hardy plant material and viable markets for these crops are not broadly available or they are not economically viable. Efforts of the Forever Green Initiative brings together research on crop development, agronomy, food science, environmental impact, commercialization, and market development to advance this next generation of crops. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) receives Clean Water Funds to support the Forever Green Agricultural Initiative at the University of Minnesota. All funding is passed through to the University of Minnesota. The MDA oversees the distribution of funds and coordinates reporting on progress results and outcomes. Since 2016, there have been 76 projects funded by the Clean Water Fund and 9 projects funded by General Funds. Research projects are selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. A list of new crop research projects by biennium can be found on the MDA's Forever Green Initiative website. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects 2022-2023 Forever Green Projects 2020-2021 Forever Green Projects 2018-2019 Forever Green Projects 2017 Forever Green Projects 2016 Forever Green Projects ",2016-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6488,Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forever-green-initiative,,,,
10006530,"Forever Green Initiative",2016,1000000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (i) $1,000,000 the first year is for grants to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to fund the Forever Green Agriculture Initiative and to protect the state's natural resources while increasing the efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers by incorporating perennial and winter-annual crops into existing agricultural practices ",,"FY16 dollars supported eleven projects which focus on incorporating perennial and winter annual crops into existing agricultural practices were selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. Additional project information for these thirteen projects and previous projects, can be found on the MDA's Forever Green website. ",,4387793,"The Forever Green Initiative is supported by multiple sources including state and federal grants as well as investments from companies, foundations, and commodity groups. ",292460,,,,,"Public College/University","Forever Green Initiative develops perennial and cover cropping systems specific to Minnesota that are necessary to protect and restore the state's surface and groundwater resources while increasing efficiency, profitability, and productivity of Minnesota farmers. The Forever Green Initiative brings together researchers from multiple departments including plant breeding, agronomy, food science, and economics. The goal is to develop new high value commodity crops for conservation purposes. Many of these new crops could fit into a corn and soybean rotation by providing ground cover after harvest and before next spring's emergence. Winter annuals and cover crops grow between the time when annual crops are harvested in the fall and a new planting is established in the spring. This is the time when fields are bare, and most vulnerable to erosion and nutrient loss. In addition, perennials provide valuable groundcover and related environmental benefits throughout the year. Current crop research includes: The Forever Green Initiative works on 13 different crops. Crops that are closest to market ready include Intermediate Wheatgrass (Kernza),Camelina (oil and protein), Hazelnuts (oil, protein, fresh nuts), Pennycress (oil and protein), Perennial flax (oil, protein, and ornamental hedge), and Elderberry.  Clean Water funding supports Forever Green research, implementation, and program coordination. Funding for implementation and program coordination began in fiscal year 2020. ","There is general agreement that increasing the adoption of vegetative cover (cover crops, winter annuals, and perennials) has the capacity to provide significant surface and ground water quality and climate change benefits, however there are still significant barriers. Specifically, winter hardy plant material and viable markets for these crops are not broadly available or they are not economically viable. Efforts of the Forever Green Initiative brings together research on crop development, agronomy, food science, environmental impact, commercialization, and market development to advance this next generation of crops. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) receives Clean Water Funds to support the Forever Green Agricultural Initiative at the University of Minnesota. All funding is passed through to the University of Minnesota. The MDA oversees the distribution of funds and coordinates reporting on progress results and outcomes. Since 2016, there have been 76 projects funded by the Clean Water Fund and 9 projects funded by General Funds. Research projects are selected through a request for proposal process administered by the University of Minnesota. A list of new crop research projects by biennium can be found on the MDA's Forever Green Initiative website. 2024-2025 Forever Green Projects 2022-2023 Forever Green Projects 2020-2021 Forever Green Projects 2018-2019 Forever Green Projects 2017 Forever Green Projects 2016 Forever Green Projects ",2016-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6488,Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/forever-green-initiative,,,,
10008286,"FY16 High Island Creek Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Project",2016,44587,,,,,,,,,,,.15,"Sibley County","Local/Regional Government","The goal of the High Island Creek Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring project is to assist the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with meeting the objectives of the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN). This will be accomplished by providing staff support throughout fiscal years 2016 and 2017 to conduct water chemistry monitoring at two specified stream locations from ice out through October 31 capturing snow melt, rainfall events and base flow conditions. In addition, project staff will compile and submit the required data, information, and reports, and calculate pollutant loads using the FLUX32 model. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Coleton,Draeger,,"400 Court Ave. P.O. Box 1051",Gaylord,MN,,55334,,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Sibley,,"Lower Minnesota River ",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fy16-high-island-creek-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-project,,,,
20686,"Groundwater Management Areas",2017,,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(j)","$1808000 the first year is for beginning to develop and designate groundwater management areas under Minnesota Statutes section 103G.287 subdivision 4. The commissioner in consultation with the commissioners of the Pollution Control Agency health and agriculture shall establish a uniform statewide hydrogeologic mapping system that will include designated groundwater management areas. The mapping system must include wellhead protection areas special well construction areas groundwater provinces groundwater recharge areas and other designated or geographical areas related to groundwater. This mapping system shall be used to implement all groundwater-related laws and for reporting and evaluations. This appropriation is available until June 30 2017. Note: Amount was amended in M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 6.","In FY17 the DNR will finalize and adopt the remaining plans and begin implementing the actions identified. The DNR will also start the process of developing a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area.","In FY17 the DNR completed and adopted Groundwater Management Area Plans for the Straight River and Bonanza Valley. The DNR substantially completed the development of a transient groundwater model for the North and East Metro.",,,,250690,10793,,1.5,,,"Minnesota’s use of groundwater has increased over the last two decades. An increasing reliance on groundwater may not be a sustainable path for continued economic growth and development. The DNR is establishing three pilot groundwater management areas (GWMA) to help improve groundwater appropriation decisions and help groundwater users better understand and plan for future groundwater needs associated with economic development. The three areas include: the North and East Metropolitan Region, which includes all of Ramsey and Washington Counties, and the southern portion of Anoka County; the second area includes the Straight River, near Park Rapids; and the third area includes portions of Pope, Stearns, and Kandiyohi counties, known as Bonanza Valley, which includes the towns of Glenwood, Brooten, Belgrade, Elrosa and other communities. Clean Water Funds are used to hire project managers, meeting facilitators and support stakeholder engagement to inform and advise the planning process.","Water is crucial to Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems. Minnesota has a well-deserved image of having abundant water resources, nevertheless, water is not evenly distributed across the state. Despite our popular image, water is becoming scarce in parts of Minnesota. Unprecedented water use conflicts are arising between businesses, towns, and residents. In most areas of the state, we are not yet in “crisis” mode when it comes to water availability. We have time to address these issues and ensure that Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems have adequate water supplies in the future. Each of the selected pilot Groundwater Management Areas has been experiencing increased use and reliance on groundwater to meet public or private needs. The purpose of a groundwater management area is to organize resources and people to better understand the risk of overuse and contamination in these areas, and to develop a plan that the Department of Natural Resources can implement to ensure sustainable use of water. ",,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jason,Moeckel,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5240",jason.moeckel@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Inventory, Mapping, Planning, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Technical Assistance, Demonstration/Pilot Project","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Clearwater, Douglas, Meeker, Swift, Wadena, Anoka, Becker, Hubbard, Pope, Ramsey, Stearns, Washington",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/groundwater-management-areas,,,,
20686,"Groundwater Management Areas",2016,,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(j)","$1808000 the first year is for beginning to develop and designate groundwater management areas under Minnesota Statutes section 103G.287 subdivision 4. The commissioner in consultation with the commissioners of the Pollution Control Agency health and agriculture shall establish a uniform statewide hydrogeologic mapping system that will include designated groundwater management areas. The mapping system must include wellhead protection areas special well construction areas groundwater provinces groundwater recharge areas and other designated or geographical areas related to groundwater. This mapping system shall be used to implement all groundwater-related laws and for reporting and evaluations. This appropriation is available until June 30 2017. Note: Amount was amended in M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 6.","The DNR will finalize three Groundwater Management Area (GWMA) plans that can be approved by the commissioner. The DNR will form new advisory committee’s to advise the agency during plan implementation. Implementation will include coordinating with other agencies and local units of government and developing new information to evaluate sustainability of current and projected water use. ","In FY16 the DNR worked with stakeholder advisory committees to complete draft plans for each of the three Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs). The plan for the North and East Metro Area was finalized and approved by the DNR Commissioner. Plans for the Bonanza Valley and Straight River were nearing completion and approval. ",,,,256899,83660,,2.3,,,"Minnesota’s use of groundwater has increased over the last two decades. An increasing reliance on groundwater may not be a sustainable path for continued economic growth and development. The DNR is establishing three pilot groundwater management areas (GWMA) to help improve groundwater appropriation decisions and help groundwater users better understand and plan for future groundwater needs associated with economic development. The three areas include: the North and East Metropolitan Region, which includes all of Ramsey and Washington Counties, and the southern portion of Anoka County; the second area includes the Straight River, near Park Rapids; and the third area includes portions of Pope, Stearns, and Kandiyohi counties, known as Bonanza Valley, which includes the towns of Glenwood, Brooten, Belgrade, Elrosa and other communities. Clean Water Funds are used to hire project managers, meeting facilitators and support stakeholder engagement to inform and advise the planning process.","Water is crucial to Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems. Minnesota has a well-deserved image of having abundant water resources, nevertheless, water is not evenly distributed across the state. Despite our popular image, water is becoming scarce in parts of Minnesota. Unprecedented water use conflicts are arising between businesses, towns, and residents. In most areas of the state, we are not yet in “crisis” mode when it comes to water availability. We have time to address these issues and ensure that Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems have adequate water supplies in the future. Each of the selected pilot Groundwater Management Areas has been experiencing increased use and reliance on groundwater to meet public or private needs. The purpose of a groundwater management area is to organize resources and people to better understand the risk of overuse and contamination in these areas, and to develop a plan that the Department of Natural Resources can implement to ensure sustainable use of water. ",,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jason,Moeckel,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5240",jason.moeckel@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Inventory, Mapping, Planning, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Technical Assistance, Demonstration/Pilot Project","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Clearwater, Douglas, Meeker, Swift, Wadena, Anoka, Becker, Hubbard, Pope, Ramsey, Stearns, Washington",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/groundwater-management-areas,,,,
20686,"Groundwater Management Areas",2015,,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(j)","$1808000 the first year is for beginning to develop and designate groundwater management areas under Minnesota Statutes section 103G.287 subdivision 4. The commissioner in consultation with the commissioners of the Pollution Control Agency health and agriculture shall establish a uniform statewide hydrogeologic mapping system that will include designated groundwater management areas. The mapping system must include wellhead protection areas special well construction areas groundwater provinces groundwater recharge areas and other designated or geographical areas related to groundwater. This mapping system shall be used to implement all groundwater-related laws and for reporting and evaluations. This appropriation is available until June 30 2017. Note: Amount was amended in M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 6.","The DNR will conduct technical analysis of existing information in each GWMA and finalize a plan that can be approved by the DNR Commissioner and implemented over the next 5 years within these areas. Each plan will include specific actions that the DNR will take to: ensure groundwater use does not harm aquifers and ecosystems and does not negatively impact surface waters; ensure that groundwater use is reasonable efficient and complies with water conservation requirements; ensure groundwater use will not degrade water quality; ensure groundwater use does not create unresolved well interferences or water use conflicts; and ensure all groundwater users have the necessary permits to use groundwater. For complete information see the GWMAs webpage at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/gwmp/areas.html ","The DNR continued technical analysis and worked with stakeholders to develop draft plans for the three proposed groundwater management areas. The areas include: the North and East Metro Bonanza Valley (Glenwood to Paynesville) and the Straight River (near Park Rapids). The draft plans include specific actions the DNR will take to ensure that water use is sustainable. ",,,,379861,93329,,3.2,,,"Minnesota’s use of groundwater has increased over the last two decades. An increasing reliance on groundwater may not be a sustainable path for continued economic growth and development. The DNR is establishing three pilot groundwater management areas (GWMA) to help improve groundwater appropriation decisions and help groundwater users better understand and plan for future groundwater needs associated with economic development. The three areas include: the North and East Metropolitan Region, which includes all of Ramsey and Washington Counties, and the southern portion of Anoka County; the second area includes the Straight River, near Park Rapids; and the third area includes portions of Pope, Stearns, and Kandiyohi counties, known as Bonanza Valley, which includes the towns of Glenwood, Brooten, Belgrade, Elrosa and other communities. Clean Water Funds are used to hire project managers, meeting facilitators and support stakeholder engagement to inform and advise the planning process.","Water is crucial to Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems. Minnesota has a well-deserved image of having abundant water resources, nevertheless, water is not evenly distributed across the state. Despite our popular image, water is becoming scarce in parts of Minnesota. Unprecedented water use conflicts are arising between businesses, towns, and residents. In most areas of the state, we are not yet in “crisis” mode when it comes to water availability. We have time to address these issues and ensure that Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems have adequate water supplies in the future. Each of the selected pilot Groundwater Management Areas has been experiencing increased use and reliance on groundwater to meet public or private needs. The purpose of a groundwater management area is to organize resources and people to better understand the risk of overuse and contamination in these areas, and to develop a plan that the Department of Natural Resources can implement to ensure sustainable use of water. ",,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jason,Moeckel,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5240",jason.moeckel@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Inventory, Mapping, Planning, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Technical Assistance, Demonstration/Pilot Project","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Clearwater, Douglas, Meeker, Swift, Wadena, Anoka, Becker, Hubbard, Pope, Ramsey, Stearns, Washington",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/groundwater-management-areas,,,,
20686,"Groundwater Management Areas",2014,1808000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(j)","$1808000 the first year is for beginning to develop and designate groundwater management areas under Minnesota Statutes section 103G.287 subdivision 4. The commissioner in consultation with the commissioners of the Pollution Control Agency health and agriculture shall establish a uniform statewide hydrogeologic mapping system that will include designated groundwater management areas. The mapping system must include wellhead protection areas special well construction areas groundwater provinces groundwater recharge areas and other designated or geographical areas related to groundwater. This mapping system shall be used to implement all groundwater-related laws and for reporting and evaluations. This appropriation is available until June 30 2017. Note: Amount was amended in M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 6.","In FY14 the DNR will lead a year-long effort in three proposed Groundwater Management Areas: the North and East Metro GWMA the Bonanza Valley GWMA and the Straight River GWMA. A series of stakeholder meetings will be held and Preliminary Assessment Reports will be completed for all three GWMAs.","In FY14 the DNR initiated planning projects and stakeholder involvement efforts to establish three groundwater management areas (GWMA’s). DNR formed a project advisory team (PAT) for each of these areas to provide advice and feedback during the GWMA planning process. The project advisory team includes cities permitted users business people conservation districts and other state agencies. DNR completed preliminary assessments of technical information and shared that information with the PAT’s over a series of monthly meetings. Discussions about potential actions are ongoing and will inform plan development. For complete information see the GWMAs webpage at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/gwmp/areas.html ",,,,267151,62179,,2.5,,,"Minnesota’s use of groundwater has increased over the last two decades. An increasing reliance on groundwater may not be a sustainable path for continued economic growth and development. The DNR is establishing three pilot groundwater management areas (GWMA) to help improve groundwater appropriation decisions and help groundwater users better understand and plan for future groundwater needs associated with economic development. The three areas include: the North and East Metropolitan Region, which includes all of Ramsey and Washington Counties, and the southern portion of Anoka County; the second area includes the Straight River, near Park Rapids; and the third area includes portions of Pope, Stearns, and Kandiyohi counties, known as Bonanza Valley, which includes the towns of Glenwood, Brooten, Belgrade, Elrosa and other communities. Clean Water Funds are used to hire project managers, meeting facilitators and support stakeholder engagement to inform and advise the planning process.","Water is crucial to Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems. Minnesota has a well-deserved image of having abundant water resources, nevertheless, water is not evenly distributed across the state. Despite our popular image, water is becoming scarce in parts of Minnesota. Unprecedented water use conflicts are arising between businesses, towns, and residents. In most areas of the state, we are not yet in “crisis” mode when it comes to water availability. We have time to address these issues and ensure that Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems have adequate water supplies in the future. Each of the selected pilot Groundwater Management Areas has been experiencing increased use and reliance on groundwater to meet public or private needs. The purpose of a groundwater management area is to organize resources and people to better understand the risk of overuse and contamination in these areas, and to develop a plan that the Department of Natural Resources can implement to ensure sustainable use of water. ",,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jason,Moeckel,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5240",jason.moeckel@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Inventory, Mapping, Planning, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Technical Assistance, Demonstration/Pilot Project","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Clearwater, Douglas, Meeker, Swift, Wadena, Anoka, Becker, Hubbard, Pope, Ramsey, Stearns, Washington",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/groundwater-management-areas,,,,
10008279,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project Pollutant Load Monitoring",2016,99134,,,,,,,,,,,.82,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","This project will monitor six sites within the Minnesota River Basin: Hawk Creek near Maynard, Hawk Creek near Granite Falls, Beaver Creek near Beaver Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Granite Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Hanley Falls, and Spring Creek near Hanley Falls. The sites will be monitored according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedure, which is the procedure being followed for sites currently monitored by the Hawk Creek Watershed Project. The goal of the project will be to accurately gather water quality samples and compute pollutant loads as part of an organized effort to determine spatial and long-term pollutant load information for the Minnesota River Basin. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Heidi,Rauenhorst,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","500 East DePue Avenue",Olivia,MN,56277,"(320) 523-3666",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Renville, Yellow Medicine",,"Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hawk-creek-watershed-project-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008279,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project Pollutant Load Monitoring",2018,58655,,,,,,,,,,,.41,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","This project will monitor six sites within the Minnesota River Basin: Hawk Creek near Maynard, Hawk Creek near Granite Falls, Beaver Creek near Beaver Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Granite Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Hanley Falls, and Spring Creek near Hanley Falls. The sites will be monitored according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedure, which is the procedure being followed for sites currently monitored by the Hawk Creek Watershed Project. The goal of the project will be to accurately gather water quality samples and compute pollutant loads as part of an organized effort to determine spatial and long-term pollutant load information for the Minnesota River Basin. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Heidi,Rauenhorst,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","500 East DePue Avenue",Olivia,MN,56277,"(320) 523-3666",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Renville, Yellow Medicine",,"Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hawk-creek-watershed-project-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008279,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project Pollutant Load Monitoring",2019,40953,,,,,,,,,,,.41,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","This project will monitor six sites within the Minnesota River Basin: Hawk Creek near Maynard, Hawk Creek near Granite Falls, Beaver Creek near Beaver Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Granite Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Hanley Falls, and Spring Creek near Hanley Falls. The sites will be monitored according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedure, which is the procedure being followed for sites currently monitored by the Hawk Creek Watershed Project. The goal of the project will be to accurately gather water quality samples and compute pollutant loads as part of an organized effort to determine spatial and long-term pollutant load information for the Minnesota River Basin. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Heidi,Rauenhorst,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","500 East DePue Avenue",Olivia,MN,56277,"(320) 523-3666",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Renville, Yellow Medicine",,"Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hawk-creek-watershed-project-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008279,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project Pollutant Load Monitoring",2020,13031,,,,,,,,,,,.16,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","This project will monitor six sites within the Minnesota River Basin: Hawk Creek near Maynard, Hawk Creek near Granite Falls, Beaver Creek near Beaver Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Granite Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Hanley Falls, and Spring Creek near Hanley Falls. The sites will be monitored according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedure, which is the procedure being followed for sites currently monitored by the Hawk Creek Watershed Project. The goal of the project will be to accurately gather water quality samples and compute pollutant loads as part of an organized effort to determine spatial and long-term pollutant load information for the Minnesota River Basin. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Heidi,Rauenhorst,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","500 East DePue Avenue",Olivia,MN,56277,"(320) 523-3666",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Renville, Yellow Medicine",,"Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hawk-creek-watershed-project-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008279,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project Pollutant Load Monitoring",2021,10781,,,,,,,,,,,.14,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","This project will monitor six sites within the Minnesota River Basin: Hawk Creek near Maynard, Hawk Creek near Granite Falls, Beaver Creek near Beaver Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Granite Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Hanley Falls, and Spring Creek near Hanley Falls. The sites will be monitored according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedure, which is the procedure being followed for sites currently monitored by the Hawk Creek Watershed Project. The goal of the project will be to accurately gather water quality samples and compute pollutant loads as part of an organized effort to determine spatial and long-term pollutant load information for the Minnesota River Basin. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Heidi,Rauenhorst,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","500 East DePue Avenue",Olivia,MN,56277,"(320) 523-3666",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Renville, Yellow Medicine",,"Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hawk-creek-watershed-project-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008279,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project Pollutant Load Monitoring",2022,141641,,,,,,,,,,,.29,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","This project will monitor six sites within the Minnesota River Basin: Hawk Creek near Maynard, Hawk Creek near Granite Falls, Beaver Creek near Beaver Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Granite Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Hanley Falls, and Spring Creek near Hanley Falls. The sites will be monitored according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedure, which is the procedure being followed for sites currently monitored by the Hawk Creek Watershed Project. The goal of the project will be to accurately gather water quality samples and compute pollutant loads as part of an organized effort to determine spatial and long-term pollutant load information for the Minnesota River Basin. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Heidi,Rauenhorst,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","500 East DePue Avenue",Olivia,MN,56277,"(320) 523-3666",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Renville, Yellow Medicine",,"Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hawk-creek-watershed-project-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008279,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project Pollutant Load Monitoring",2024,21099,,,,,,,,,,,.29,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","This project will monitor six sites within the Minnesota River Basin: Hawk Creek near Maynard, Hawk Creek near Granite Falls, Beaver Creek near Beaver Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Granite Falls, Yellow Medicine River near Hanley Falls, and Spring Creek near Hanley Falls. The sites will be monitored according to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedure, which is the procedure being followed for sites currently monitored by the Hawk Creek Watershed Project. The goal of the project will be to accurately gather water quality samples and compute pollutant loads as part of an organized effort to determine spatial and long-term pollutant load information for the Minnesota River Basin. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2024-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Heidi,Rauenhorst,"Hawk Creek Watershed Project","500 East DePue Avenue",Olivia,MN,56277,"(320) 523-3666",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Renville, Yellow Medicine",,"Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hawk-creek-watershed-project-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
34133,"Headwaters Science Center Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG): Otter Tail River Watershed Stream Sampling",2016,57028,,,,,,,,,,,0.50,"Headwaters Science Center","Non-Profit Business/Entity","This project will conduct water quality monitoring at 12 stream sampling sites. The sites will be monitored for chemical, physical, and bacteriological parameters over a two year time-period. The Headwaters Science Center (HSC) will be the lead agency and arrange volunteer cooperation from Trek North, Bemidji, Perham and/or Detroit Lakes High School students and their instructors. The HSC project lead will be responsible for oversight and full compliance to MPCA protocols. This project is a continuation of HSC's 18 year involvement in the RiverWatch program where High School students have an opportunity to become involved in actual resource management projects so that they can become acquainted with work done by environmental scientists while learning to be overall better stewards of our state of Minnesota's land and water. ",,"Otter Tail River Watershed ",2016-03-02,2018-01-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Susan,Joy,"Headwaters Science Center","413 Beltrami Avenue NW",Bemidji,MN,56601,"(218) 444-4472",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Otter Tail",,"Otter Tail River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/headwaters-science-center-surface-water-assessment-grant-swag-otter-tail-river-watershed-st,,,,
33257,"Hydrologic Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) Rum River Model Extension 2015",2016,39967,,,,,,,,,,,0.46,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to refine the segmentation, extend the simulation period, and recalibrate an existing Hydrologic Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) watershed model for the Rum River Watershed. ",,"Rum River Watershed",2015-12-17,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Charles P",Regan,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Benton, Chisago, Crow Wing, Isanti, Kanabec, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Sherburne",,"Rum River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hydrologic-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-rum-river-model-extension-2015,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2025,150000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (g) $150,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number of farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of partners collaborating on the development of new irrigation scheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely Number of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ",,,,,,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2024,150000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (g) $150,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number of farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of partners collaborating on the development of new irrigation scheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely Number of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ","From 2014-2024, the University of Minnesota-Extension Irrigation Specialist Position has completed 212 educational events (presentations, workshops, field days), published 38 blogs/podcasts, and submitted 14 peer-reviewed journal articles to engage over 11,000 farmers, crop consultants, and co-op dealers. This work is in cooperation with 42 local units of government (LGUs). ",,,,123887,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2023,135000,"M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (g) $135,000 the first year and $135,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2025. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number of farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of partners collaborating on the development of new irrigation scheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely Number of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ",,,,,149599,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2022,135000,"M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (g) $135,000 the first year and $135,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2025.   "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number offarmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of irrigators participating in Clean Water funded irrigation management programs Number of irrigation best management practices (BMPs) revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ","From 2014-2022, the University of Minnesota-Extension Irrigation Specialist Position has completed over 180 educational events (presentations, workshops, field days), published 26 blogs/podcasts, and submitted 9 peer-reviewed journal articles to engage over 10,000 farmers, crop consultants, and co-op dealers. This work is in cooperation with 20 local units of government (LGUs). About 500 irrigators, managing about 100,000 irrigator acres, participated in Clean Water funded irrigation management programs (irrigation clinics, irrigation field days, nitrogen management conference). At least 250 irrigators access daily evapotranspiration weather information for water management. In FY21: 3 sets of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Early season irrigation water management (Link to blog) Crop water use and irrigation timing (Link to blog) Irrigation and nutrient management (Link to blog) Checklist for winterizing your irrigation system (2020) Predicting the last irrigation for corn and soybeans in central Minnesota (2020) How to ensure efficient crop irrigation management (2020) Interested in upgrading your irrigation system? Cost-share program available to irrigators in 19 Minnesota counties (2022) Other notable deliverables from this position: Developed a new two-day training to cover new irrigation technology, nitrogen management, and water management “Minnesota Irrigators Program” Participants that complete the course and are MAWQCP certified are eligible for Irrigation Water Management endorsement Irrigation scheduling references and BMPs (2020) Statewide Irrigation Soils map and Survey (2020) GIS Irrigability Data Layer (2020) Has developed an Extension publication “Irrigation Best Management Practices for Minnesota”. The publication is currently under review (2022) Precision Irrigation Cost-Share $1.2M in state funds used to leverage $3,510,000 funds from the USDA NRCS Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) 33 partners provide financial and technical support for precision irrigation to irrigators (USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Services (NRCS), soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs), institutes of education, Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, state agencies, irrigator's associations, and businesses) 5-year project First opened for applications May 2022 and a second round of cost-share closed December 16, 2022. ",,,,120963,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2021,150000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (g) $150,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water qualityspecialist through University of Minnesota Extension. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number offarmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of irrigators participating in Clean Water funded irrigation management programs Number of irrigation best management practices (BMPs) revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for a summary. ",,,,156511,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2020,150000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (g) $150,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number offarmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of irrigators participating in Clean Water funded irrigation management programs Number of irrigation best management practices (BMPs) revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ","In 2015-2020: About 7,100 farmers, crop consultants, and co-op dealers participated in 118 educational events (presentations,workshops, field days) 20 local government unit partners are involved in irrigation water quality protection 500 irrigators, managing about 100,000 acres, participated in Clean Water Fund supported irrigation management programs (irrigation clinics, irrigation field days, nitrogen management conference) In 2020: About 250 irrigators accessed daily evapotranspiration weather information for water management Three new irrigation best management practices were revised, developed and promoted online ",,,,175441,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2019,110000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,128267,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2018,110000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,68479,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2017,110000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ","Irrigation specialist: Joshua Stamper FY14-15:  The University of Minnesota-Extension Irrigation Specialist Position completed 42 presentations, workshops and other educational events attended by approximately 2,300 farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers. Worked in cooperation with 8 local units of government (LGUs). FY16-17: 44 education and outreach activities were completed involving approximately 2,700participants. Cooperation continues with 8 LGUs. New irrigation scheduling references and BMPs are under development which will lead to greater irrigation BMP adoption. Dakota County Irrigation Scheduling Program focused on providing technical advice to irrigators about irrigation water management tools that matched their irrigation management. Surveyed irrigators and determined that there is significant interest in collecting in-season irrigation water sampling to credit nitratesthat are in irrigation water sample. Completed: Revision of irrigation water management publications Statewide Irrigation Soils map and Survey GIS Irrigability Data Layer YouTube Videos (easily accessible educational materials) Irrigation specialist Dr. Vasu Sharma started July 1, 2018   ",,,,53790,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2016,110000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,149424,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2015,110000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2013: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number of farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of partners collaborating on the development of new irrigation scheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely Number of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number of farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend (96 events / 395 participants) Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities (8) Number of partners collaborating on the development of new irrigation scheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely (6) Information will be collected via personal conversations, interviews, focus groups or surveys for these performance measures. Number of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ",,,,139361,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2014,110000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2013: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,28945,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,,
10008290,"Itasca County SWCD Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2016,30279,,,,,,,,,,,.24,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","Itasca SWCD will work with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as a collaborative effort to monitor the Big Fork River near Bigfork at State Highway 6 and Big Fork River near Craigsville at State Highway 6. Itasca Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) staff will strive to capture the peak, rising, and falling limbs of the hydrograph for spring run-off and significant storm events as well as base flow samples. Itasca SWCD staff will utilize local rain gauge readers, storm tracking weather services, and historical stage data to aid in making monitoring judgments. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-03-21,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Andy,Arens,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","1889 E. Hwy. 2","Grand Rapids",MN,55744,"(218) 326-0017",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Itasca, Koochiching",,"Big Fork River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/itasca-county-swcd-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008290,"Itasca County SWCD Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2018,31501,,,,,,,,,,,.24,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","Itasca SWCD will work with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as a collaborative effort to monitor the Big Fork River near Bigfork at State Highway 6 and Big Fork River near Craigsville at State Highway 6. Itasca Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) staff will strive to capture the peak, rising, and falling limbs of the hydrograph for spring run-off and significant storm events as well as base flow samples. Itasca SWCD staff will utilize local rain gauge readers, storm tracking weather services, and historical stage data to aid in making monitoring judgments. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-03-21,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Andy,Arens,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","1889 E. Hwy. 2","Grand Rapids",MN,55744,"(218) 326-0017",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Itasca, Koochiching",,"Big Fork River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/itasca-county-swcd-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008290,"Itasca County SWCD Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2021,13950,,,,,,,,,,,.13,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","Itasca SWCD will work with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as a collaborative effort to monitor the Big Fork River near Bigfork at State Highway 6 and Big Fork River near Craigsville at State Highway 6. Itasca Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) staff will strive to capture the peak, rising, and falling limbs of the hydrograph for spring run-off and significant storm events as well as base flow samples. Itasca SWCD staff will utilize local rain gauge readers, storm tracking weather services, and historical stage data to aid in making monitoring judgments. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-03-21,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Andy,Arens,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","1889 E. Hwy. 2","Grand Rapids",MN,55744,"(218) 326-0017",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Itasca, Koochiching",,"Big Fork River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/itasca-county-swcd-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008290,"Itasca County SWCD Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2022,15320,,,,,,,,,,,.11,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","Itasca SWCD will work with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as a collaborative effort to monitor the Big Fork River near Bigfork at State Highway 6 and Big Fork River near Craigsville at State Highway 6. Itasca Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) staff will strive to capture the peak, rising, and falling limbs of the hydrograph for spring run-off and significant storm events as well as base flow samples. Itasca SWCD staff will utilize local rain gauge readers, storm tracking weather services, and historical stage data to aid in making monitoring judgments. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-03-21,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Andy,Arens,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","1889 E. Hwy. 2","Grand Rapids",MN,55744,"(218) 326-0017",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Itasca, Koochiching",,"Big Fork River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/itasca-county-swcd-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008290,"Itasca County SWCD Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2024,29988,,,,,,,,,,,.10,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","Itasca SWCD will work with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as a collaborative effort to monitor the Big Fork River near Bigfork at State Highway 6 and Big Fork River near Craigsville at State Highway 6. Itasca Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) staff will strive to capture the peak, rising, and falling limbs of the hydrograph for spring run-off and significant storm events as well as base flow samples. Itasca SWCD staff will utilize local rain gauge readers, storm tracking weather services, and historical stage data to aid in making monitoring judgments. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-03-21,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Andy,Arens,"Itasca County Soil and Water Conservation District","1889 E. Hwy. 2","Grand Rapids",MN,55744,"(218) 326-0017",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Itasca, Koochiching",,"Big Fork River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/itasca-county-swcd-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
34222,"Kandi Creek Watershed",2016,120024,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Funds will be used to hire an engineer.","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 4.59 lbs of phosphorus and 22.16 tons of sediment.","Achieved proposed outcomes",62500,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",250000,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",2.56,"Kandiyohi SWCD","Local/Regional Government","For several decades, community members, lake associations, county officials, and local natural resource professionals have targeted Lake Wakanda in Kandiyohi County to improve water quality. This community led team, is working to address conservation issues within the watershed and the deeply degraded waters caused by years of altered hydrology, increased urban stormwater runoff, and increased agricultural pressures. This grant application is a phase I approach to resolving these issues by focusing on watershed management in Kandi Creek, a tributary into Lake Wakanda. This project includes a number of in-field and in-channel best management practices to reduce sediment and nutrient pollution.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Rick,Reimer,"Kandiyohi SWCD","1005 High Avenue NE",Willmar,MN,56201,"320-235-3906 x 132",rick.reimer@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Kandiyohi,,"South Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/kandi-creek-watershed,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34264,"Keller Lake (Crystal Beach Park) Storm Water Quality Improvement Project",2016,398000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in an estimated phosphorus load reduction of 78 lbs/yr into Keller Lake. ",,,482000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",398000,,"Members for Burnsville, City of are: Curtis Enestvedt, Doug Anderson, Greg Helms, John Glynn, Mike Hughes, Roger Baldwin, Scott Thureen, Tom Harmening",0.02,"Burnsville, City of","Local/Regional Government","The Keller Lake Water Quality Improvement Project achieves the goals of the City of Burnsville, Black Dog Watershed Management Organization, and the Keller Lake TMDL by:-Achieving the City of Burnsville phosphorus removal requirement outlined in the Keller Lake TMDL by removing 78 lbs/yr-Utilizing remaining available land to construct a high performance, regional stormwater BMP-Providing a high profile water resource/stormwater educational opportunity in the frequently visited Crystal Beach Park-Retaining valuable open space in popular Crystal Beach Park by constructing the BMP undergroundKeller Lake (DNR ID: 19-0025-00) is listed on the 303(d) Impaired Waters List for nutrient impairment. Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) were established for Keller Lake following requirements set by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to achieve the eutrophication standards. The City of Burnsville is required to reduce overall loading of total phosphorus to Keller Lake by 74 lbs (47%) annually to meet the determined TMDL of 82 lbs/yr. Phosphorus sources for Keller Lake include stormwater runoff from the watershed and internal phosphorus from the lake sediment, plant life, etc. The proposed project site, as contained in the TMDL Implementation Plan, is Crystal Beach Park. This location contains both a 66-inch and 36-inch storm sewer that discharge untreated stormwater into Keller Lake. To remove phosphorus, the contaminant of concern, both storm sewer systems will be diverted to a treatment train consisting of pre-treatment isolator chamber with baffle walls, underground retention vault, and 1 cubic foot per second filter drawdown system to provide enhanced stormwater treatment prior to discharge back to the 66-inch trunk storm sewer and into Keller Lake. Due to the public perception of the existing Crystal Beach Park and the high volume of park visitors, underground storage and filtration is the ideal stormwater treatment BMP for phosphorus removal.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Daryl,Jacobson,"Burnsville, City of","100 Civic Center Pkwy",Burnsville,MN,553373867,952-895-4574,daryl.jacobson@burnsvillemn.gov,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Dakota,,"Lower Minnesota River ",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/keller-lake-crystal-beach-park-storm-water-quality-improvement-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
36600,"Kettle River and Upper Saint Croix WRAPS - Phase 1",2016,22175,,,,,,,,,,,.18,"Carlton County SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Starting in 2016 the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) will be collecting monitoring data on many lakes and streams in the Kettle River and Upper Saint Croix Watersheds. While this information will be useful to assess the overall health of the watershed, it will miss locations in the watershed that can provide critical information to local implementers, local governments, and citizens. This contract will help collect that vital information to help inform not only local entities, and the assessment process, but will also help fill any necessary gaps for potential Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) or protection targeting. ",,"Kettle River Watershed Upper St. Croix River Watershed ",2016-03-21,2018-06-29,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Brad,Matlack,"Carlton County SWCD ","PO Box 29 ",Carlton,MN,55718,"(218) 384-3891",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Carlton, Pine",,"Kettle River, Upper St. Croix River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/kettle-river-and-upper-saint-croix-wraps-phase-1,,,,
34213,"King Park Stormwater Reuse Project",2016,78500,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The pollutants of concern that are addressed by this project are E. coli bacteria, sediment, temperature (via excess volume) and phosphorus. Quantitative goals include a 77-94% reduction in E. coli bacteria for reach 546 and a 2-62% reduction in E. coli bacteria for reach 545. Qualitative goals include a temperature reduction in reach 545 and 546 to achieve DO standard in reach 545; reduced turbidity in reach, to improve habitat and meet biotic standards. An reduction of sediment loading by 1 ton per year is anticipated, as well as a reduction of 4 lbs/yr of phosphorus. ","This project resulted in estimated reductions of 4 lb. of phosphorus per year, 1 ton of sediment per year, 10 acre-feet of stormwater volume per year, and significantly reduced the number of bacteria entering the water resource of concern.",,125000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",78500,,"Members for Vermillion River Watershed JPO are: Mary Liz Holberg, Mike Slavik, Tom Wolf",0.03,"Vermillion River Watershed JPO","Local/Regional Government","King Park, a city-owned park in Lakeville, consists of baseball fields, a park building, and a parking lot. A portion of Dodd Blvd, a driveway, and the parking lot drain to a stormwater pond at the north end of the park where water is retained, treated, and reused to irrigate two ball fields. This stormwater reuse project was constructed by the Vermillion River Watershed Joint Powers Organization (VRWJPO) and the City of Lakeville in 2010 to meet VRWJPO and city goals. Runoff from the park drains into the Middle Creek tributary (reach 546) and downstream to a confluence with North Creek (545) and the Vermillion River (546). Stormwater contributes sediment, nutrients, bacteria, and heat to reaches impaired for bacteria, dissolved oxygen, fish and macroinvertebrates, degrading these resources. A primary cause of the water quality conditions in this subwatershed, and downstream, is the inability to infiltrate water due to tight soils. Dakota County and City of Lakeville plan to reconstruct part of Dodd Blvd just south of King Park in 2016. The project will provide stormwater treatment to meet regulatory requirements, but due to poor soil conditions, infiltration cannot be achieved. A pump and irrigation system will be installed and will use stormwater from the newly constructed stormwater pond to irrigate two additional ball fields. This system will serve as a surrogate for the much needed infiltration, with plans to expand the system to more ball fields in the future. A reuse system will reduce bacteria, nutrient, and thermal loads to Middle Creek, while providing nutrient benefits for park landscaping. This system would reduce stormwater volume (415,562 cubic feet/year) and thermal load to Middle Creek and downstream reaches; remove sediment (1,416 lbs/year); remove phosphorus (4.3 lbs/year); reduce E. coli (2.4 x 1016 cfu/year) decrease demand on Lakeville's water supply during summer months (3.1 million gallons/year); and maintain landscaping at King Park. ",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Travis,Thiel,"Vermillion River Watershed JPO","14955 Galaxie Ave","Apple Valley",MN,55124,952-891-7546,travis.thiel@co.dakota.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Dakota,,"Mississippi River - Lake Pepin",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/king-park-stormwater-reuse-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Nicole Clapp ",
33249,"Lac qui Parle River Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Project - Phase 2",2016,155060,,,,,,,,,,,1.73,"Lac qui Parle-Yellow Bank Watershed District","Local/Regional Government","The primary goal of this project is to partner with stakeholders in the development of a comprehensive Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) report to be used on the local level. Achieving this goal will require sound working relationships between local government units (LGUs), watershed citizens, and state and federal government. Gathering input from these groups will be critical when the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) drafts a WRAPS Report that can be utilized by local decision-makers. Working groups will be convened to become informed of the watershed management process and to assist watershed professionals in engaging the public and producing the WRAPS report.",,"Lac qui Parle River Watershed ",2015-10-19,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mary,Homan,"Lac qui Parle-Yellow Bank Watershed District","600 Sixth Street",Madison,MN,56256,"(320) 598-3319",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Yellow Medicine",,"Lac qui Parle River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lac-qui-parle-river-watershed-restoration-protection-strategy-wraps-project-phase-2,,,,
34299,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network",2016,75303,,,,,,,,,,,.46,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","Public College/University","This project is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at two subwatershed sites and two major watershed sites based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters.",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Mike,Hirst,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","206 8th Avenue SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-1945",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-soil-and-water-conservation-district-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network,,,,
34299,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network",2018,28950,,,,,,,,,,,.23,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","Public College/University","This project is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at two subwatershed sites and two major watershed sites based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters.",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Mike,Hirst,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","206 8th Avenue SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-1945",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-soil-and-water-conservation-district-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network,,,,
34299,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network",2019,20213,,,,,,,,,,,.23,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","Public College/University","This project is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at two subwatershed sites and two major watershed sites based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters.",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Mike,Hirst,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","206 8th Avenue SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-1945",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-soil-and-water-conservation-district-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network,,,,
34299,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network",2020,6726,,,,,,,,,,,.05,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","Public College/University","This project is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at two subwatershed sites and two major watershed sites based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters.",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Mike,Hirst,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","206 8th Avenue SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-1945",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-soil-and-water-conservation-district-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network,,,,
34299,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network",2021,19662,,,,,,,,,,,.14,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","Public College/University","This project is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at two subwatershed sites and two major watershed sites based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters.",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Mike,Hirst,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","206 8th Avenue SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-1945",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-soil-and-water-conservation-district-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network,,,,
34299,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network",2022,77033,,,,,,,,,,,.19,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","Public College/University","This project is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at two subwatershed sites and two major watershed sites based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters.",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Mike,Hirst,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","206 8th Avenue SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-1945",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-soil-and-water-conservation-district-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network,,,,
34299,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network",2024,63402,,,,,,,,,,,.21,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","Public College/University","This project is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at two subwatershed sites and two major watershed sites based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters.",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Mike,Hirst,"Lake of the Woods Soil and Water Conservation District","206 8th Avenue SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-1945",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-soil-and-water-conservation-district-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network,,,,
33261,"Lake Pepin Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Draft Report",2016,62280,,,,,,,,,,,0.26,LimnoTech,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to prepare a draft Lake Pepin Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Report. Lake Pepin is impaired by high levels of nutrients that cause excessive growth of algae. ",,"Mississippi River - Twin Cities WatershedMississippi River - Lake Pepin WatershedLower Minnesota River Watershed",2016-02-04,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Justin,Watkins,"MPCA Rochester Office","18 Wood Lake Drive SE",Rochester,MN,55904,"(507) 206-2621",,"Modeling, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Dakota, Goodhue, Scott, Wabasha",,"Lower Minnesota River , Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-pepin-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-draft-report,,,,
36595,"Lake of the Woods Nutrients TMDL Study",2015,305620,,,,,,,,,,,1.3,"Lake of the Woods SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Lake of the Woods (LOW) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study will: (1) identify water quality goals for the Minnesota portions of the LOW/Rainy River Watershed; (2) recommend nutrient allocations to achieve TMDLs where waters do not meet standards; and (3) provide opportunities for stakeholders to engage in the process of watershed-management planning to adopt protection and restoration strategies. The project will include existing in-lake and watershed model updates, TMDL component development, restoration plan development, and public participation. ",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2015-06-19,2020-06-24,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Johs,"Stromlund ",,"206 8th Ave SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-2757",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-nutrients-tmdl-study,,,,
36595,"Lake of the Woods Nutrients TMDL Study",2016,66412,,,,,,,,,,,.33,"Lake of the Woods SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Lake of the Woods (LOW) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study will: (1) identify water quality goals for the Minnesota portions of the LOW/Rainy River Watershed; (2) recommend nutrient allocations to achieve TMDLs where waters do not meet standards; and (3) provide opportunities for stakeholders to engage in the process of watershed-management planning to adopt protection and restoration strategies. The project will include existing in-lake and watershed model updates, TMDL component development, restoration plan development, and public participation. ",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2015-06-19,2020-06-24,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Johs,"Stromlund ",,"206 8th Ave SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-2757",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-nutrients-tmdl-study,,,,
36595,"Lake of the Woods Nutrients TMDL Study",2017,47202,,,,,,,,,,,.25,"Lake of the Woods SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Lake of the Woods (LOW) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study will: (1) identify water quality goals for the Minnesota portions of the LOW/Rainy River Watershed; (2) recommend nutrient allocations to achieve TMDLs where waters do not meet standards; and (3) provide opportunities for stakeholders to engage in the process of watershed-management planning to adopt protection and restoration strategies. The project will include existing in-lake and watershed model updates, TMDL component development, restoration plan development, and public participation. ",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2015-06-19,2020-06-24,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Johs,"Stromlund ",,"206 8th Ave SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-2757",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-nutrients-tmdl-study,,,,
36595,"Lake of the Woods Nutrients TMDL Study",2019,34422,,,,,,,,,,,.21,"Lake of the Woods SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Lake of the Woods (LOW) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study will: (1) identify water quality goals for the Minnesota portions of the LOW/Rainy River Watershed; (2) recommend nutrient allocations to achieve TMDLs where waters do not meet standards; and (3) provide opportunities for stakeholders to engage in the process of watershed-management planning to adopt protection and restoration strategies. The project will include existing in-lake and watershed model updates, TMDL component development, restoration plan development, and public participation. ",,"Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2015-06-19,2020-06-24,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Johs,"Stromlund ",,"206 8th Ave SE",Baudette,MN,56623,"(218) 634-2757",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Lake of the Woods",,"Lake of the Woods",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woods-nutrients-tmdl-study,,,,
28171,"Lake of the Woods/Rainy River Watershed Forum",2015,500,,,,,,,,,,,,"Lake of the Woods Water Sustainability Foundation","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is a co-sponsor and assists with a portion of the financial support for the International Rainy River-Lake of the Woods Watershed Forum. ",,"Rainy River - Rainy Lake Watershed Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2015-01-15,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tom,Sellers,"Lake of the Woods Water Sustainability Foundation","Box 112",Kenora,Ontario,"P9N 3X1","(866) 370-8891",,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Cook, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Roseau, St. Louis",,"Lake of the Woods, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woodsrainy-river-watershed-forum-2015,,,,
28171,"Lake of the Woods/Rainy River Watershed Forum",2016,500,,,,,,,,,,,,"Lake of the Woods Water Sustainability Foundation","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is a co-sponsor and assists with a portion of the financial support for the International Rainy River-Lake of the Woods Watershed Forum. ",,"Rainy River - Rainy Lake Watershed Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2015-01-15,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tom,Sellers,"Lake of the Woods Water Sustainability Foundation","Box 112",Kenora,Ontario,"P9N 3X1","(866) 370-8891",,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Cook, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Roseau, St. Louis",,"Lake of the Woods, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woodsrainy-river-watershed-forum-2015,,,,
28171,"Lake of the Woods/Rainy River Watershed Forum",2017,500,,,,,,,,,,,,"Lake of the Woods Water Sustainability Foundation","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is a co-sponsor and assists with a portion of the financial support for the International Rainy River-Lake of the Woods Watershed Forum. ",,"Rainy River - Rainy Lake Watershed Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2015-01-15,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tom,Sellers,"Lake of the Woods Water Sustainability Foundation","Box 112",Kenora,Ontario,"P9N 3X1","(866) 370-8891",,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Cook, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Roseau, St. Louis",,"Lake of the Woods, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woodsrainy-river-watershed-forum-2015,,,,
28171,"Lake of the Woods/Rainy River Watershed Forum",2018,500,,,,,,,,,,,,"Lake of the Woods Water Sustainability Foundation","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) is a co-sponsor and assists with a portion of the financial support for the International Rainy River-Lake of the Woods Watershed Forum. ",,"Rainy River - Rainy Lake Watershed Lake of the Woods Watershed ",2015-01-15,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tom,Sellers,"Lake of the Woods Water Sustainability Foundation","Box 112",Kenora,Ontario,"P9N 3X1","(866) 370-8891",,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Cook, Koochiching, Lake, Lake of the Woods, Roseau, St. Louis",,"Lake of the Woods, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-woodsrainy-river-watershed-forum-2015,,,,
34228,"Lake St. Croix Direct Discharge Stormwater Retrofit Phase II",2016,151510,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","A 2009 study identified increased stormwater runoff, erosion, and wastewater discharge associated with historical land use change as the root causes of eutrophication in Lake St. Croix. Proposed Low Impact Development retrofits to a 1,852 acre urban pipeshed are estimated to prevent at least 10 pounds of phosphorus/year and 3,000 lbs/year of suspended solids from directly discharging into Lake St. Croix. ","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 37.7 lbs of phosphorus, 5.98 tons of sediment, and 8.5 acre-feet per year of water volume.","achieved proposed outcomes",41025,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",151510,3,,0.21,"Middle St. Croix River WMO","Local/Regional Government","This project will continue to address the nutrient impairment of Lake St. Croix through the installation of targeted stormwater treatment best management practices as prioritized in the 2014 Lake St. Croix Direct Discharge Stormwater Retrofit Assessment. The goal is to install up to 24 Low Impact Development practices to reduce urban pollutant loading to Lake St. Croix by at least 12.0 pounds phosphorous and 3,000 pounds TSS and 1.0 acre foot of stormwater per year. This project parallels many ongoing watershed restoration efforts to meet the Middle St. Croix's phosphorous load reduction goal 1,521 pounds of phosphorous per year identified by the MPCA as part of the 2012 Lake St. Croix Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) . ",,,2016-01-22,2020-01-24,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mikael,Isensee,"Middle St. Croix River WMO","455 Hayward Ave",Oakdale,MN,55128,"651-320-8220 x 22",misensee@mnwcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Washington,,"Lower St. Croix River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-st-croix-direct-discharge-stormwater-retrofit-phase-ii,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
34229,"Lake George Watershed Targeted BMP Analysis",2016,60000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","A 78.4 ton/yr reduction (1%) of TSS and 90.2 lbs/yr of total phosphorus is anticipated with this project. ","The subwatershed assessment was completed as proposed.","Achieved proposed outcomes",30000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",81791,165,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.06,"Anoka CD","Local/Regional Government","Lake George is the premier recreational lake in Anoka County with above average water quality, a vibrant fishery, and a large regional park and beach that is among the most utilized in the county. Located in northwestern Anoka County within the Upper Rum River Watershed Management Organization (URRWMO), the Lake George Improvement District (LGID) was formed to tend to the lake's diminishing water quality and problematic invasive species. In the last decade, Lake George's lake grade according to Met Council's lake water quality report card has dropped from a consistent A grade to a consistent B grade. The Rum River WRAPS task force has preliminarily identified Lake George as a protection concern. The WRAPS will not, however, provide a specific implementation plan to address this lake resource. In effort to halt, and hopefully reverse the trend of declining water quality the LGID intends to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) within the lake and throughout the watershed. Before this can be done, project opportunities and their associated costs and benefits must be ascertained. The purpose of this project is to identify water quality improvement opportunities throughout the watershed to achieve water quality management goals. SWAT, PTM App. or other suitable models will be used to model the watershed and the effect of selected BMPs within it. The model will be calibrated with hydrology and water quality monitoring data to ensure the highest degree of accuracy possible. This watershed level analysis is the first of two phases of project identification, modeling and cost-benefit analysis; with the second phase focusing on near-lake and in-lake project opportunities. Projects identified by this and subsequent efforts will be presented for incorporation into the Upper Rum River WMO's plan update scheduled for completion by the end of 2017.",,,2016-01-21,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chris,Lord,"Anoka CD","1318 McKay Dr NE, Ste 300","Ham Lake",MN,55304,763-434-2030,chris.lord@anokaswcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Anoka,,"Rum River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-george-watershed-targeted-bmp-analysis,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34240,"Lake Vermilion Community Partners",2016,78000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Community Partners 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in 3 to 6 projects along Lake Vermillion. ","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 22.8 lbs of phosphorus, 16.5 tons of sediment, and 36.8 tons per year of soil loss.","achieved proposed outcomes",19500,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",78000,3,,0.16,"St Louis, North SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The North St. Louis Soil & Water Conservation District will work with lake and resort associations, chambers of commerce, and various community groups to identify 3-6 projects with maximum public benefit. Potential projects include community rain gardens, native vegetative buffers and shoreline restorations that improve water quality by reducing stormwater runoff, cleaning stormwater before it is released to the lakes and retaining water on the land longer. The primary waterbody targeted is Lake Vermilion which covers 40,557 acres and has 290 miles of shoreline - the longest in Minnesota. It boasts 365 islands and has direct access to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-02-21,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Anita,Provinzino,"St Louis, North SWCD",,,,,218-471-7284,anita@nslswcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"St. Louis",,"Vermilion River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-vermilion-community-partners,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2025,1450000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(b)","$1,450,000 the first year and $1,450,000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","In FY25 DNR staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. FIBI surveys representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes in nearshore and deep-water zones. DNR will also complete approximately 20 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities and approximately 100 coldwater, oxygenated habitat surveys to evaluate habitat availability for coldwater fishes. The survey data will be used to determine whether the lakes meet biological standards, to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. Survey data will be used in watershed assessments for about 101 lakes in three major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. Approximately six watershed stressor identification reports will be completed and submitted to MPCA for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. DNR will continue working with MPCA and other partners towards the implementation of new standards to protect coldwater fish habitat and exceptionally diverse and healthy fish communities. DNR will also continue work to expand the geographic scope of FIBI monitoring and assessment to include lakes in far northeastern Minnesota by increasing sampling in northeastern MN lakes and developing new models for the unique fish communities. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports will be updated annually on the DNR, MPCA, and Minnesota Water Research Digital Library websites, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI and habitat data will be used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2024,1450000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(b)","$1,450,000 the first year and $1,450,000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. "," In FY24 DNR staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. FIBI surveys representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. DNR will also complete approximately 40 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities and approximately 50 coldwater, oxygenated habitat surveys to evaluate habitat availability for coldwater fishes. The survey data will be used to determine whether the lakes meet biological standards, to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. Survey data will be used in watershed assessments for about 84 lakes in six major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. Approximately six watershed stressor identification reports will be completed and submitted to MPCA for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. DNR will continue working with MPCA and other partners towards the implementation of new standards to protect coldwater fish habitat and exceptionally diverse and healthy fish communities. This will include responding to public comments on proposed standards and completing a biomonitoring program review in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency. DNR will also continue work to expand the geographic scope of FIBI monitoring and assessment to include lakes in far northeastern Minnesota (including lakes within the Lake Superior and Rainy Lake Basins). FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports will be updated annually on the DNR and MPCA websites, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data will be used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ","In FY24 Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff completed 136 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 217 habitat surveys (18 shoreline habitat and 199 oxythermal habitat). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame, in nearshore and deep-water zones. Shoreline habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. Oxythermal surveys measure available cold, oxygenated water for coldwater fishes. FIBI survey information was used by MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for 77 lake assessments in six major watersheds throughout Minnesota. Assessments determine biological condition for identifying lakes considered as impaired, lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and lakes of exceptional biological quality. DNR published watershed stressor identification reports for lakes in three watersheds. In collaboration with MPCA, DNR drafted new biological and water quality standards and supporting documents outlining the science behind the new standards. The new standards will protect coldwater fishes and their habitat, and lakes with exceptionally healthy and diverse fish communities. DNR expanded FIBI program work to the far northeastern part of the state, completing over 163 surveys in the Lake Superior North and Rainy River Headwater Watersheds; these lakes will be assessed with new standards to protect coldwater lakes in the next two years. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports are available on the DNR website, MPCA website, Minnesota Water Research Digital Library website, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI and coldwater fish habitat data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and in Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,1322766,121378,,13.1,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2023,1000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","In FY23 DNR staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. FIBI surveys representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. DNR will also complete approximately 40 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities and approximately 15 coldwater, oxygenated habitat surveys to evaluate habitat availability for coldwater fishes. The survey data will be used to determine whether the lakes meet biological standards, to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. Survey data will be used in watershed assessments for about 36 lakes in three major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule (MPCA reduced the number of watersheds due to 2020-2021 Covid related delays). Approximately six watershed stressor identification reports will be submitted to MPCA for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. DNR will continue working with MPCA and other partners towards the implementation of new standards to protect coldwater fish habitat and exceptionally diverse and healthy fish communities. This will include collecting public comments on proposed standards and undertaking a biomonitoring program review in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency. DNR will also begin work to expand the geographic scope of FIBI monitoring and assessment to include lakes in far northeastern Minnesota (including lakes within the Lake Superior and Rainy Lake Basins). FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports will be updated annually on the DNR and MPCA websites, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data will be used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ","In FY23 Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff completed 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 102 habitat surveys (31 shoreline habitat and 71 oxythermal habitat). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities or cold, oxygenated water available for coldwater fishes. FIBI survey information was used by MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for 42 lake assessments in three major watersheds throughout Minnesota. Assessments determine biological condition for identifying lakes considered as impaired, lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and lakes of exceptional biological quality. DNR published watershed stressor identification reports for lakes in four watersheds. DNR drafted new biological and water quality standards and two technical support documents outlining the science behind the new standards in collaboration with MPCA. The new standards will protect coldwater fishes and their habitat and lakes with exceptionally healthy and diverse fish communities. DNR expanded FIBI program work to the far northeastern part of the state, completing over 30 surveys in the Lake Superior North Watershed. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports are available on the DNR website, MPCA website, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and in Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,1023084,76759,,11.8,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2022,1000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","Fish: In FY22 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 120 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 30 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. FIBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 109 lakes in two major watersheds following MPCA's watershed schedule including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We will publish stressor identification reports for lakes in approximately six watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. FIBI data will be used for prioritization of protection and restoration projects in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Watershed Plans. We will work towards implementation of new standards to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. In FY22 DNR Ecological and Water Resources (EWR) staff will shift their work focus to directly support the Fish IBI surveys. Most aquatic plant IBI surveys will be discontinued. This change is being made to address budget reductions and shifting priorities. EWR staff will help conduct fish surveys as well as floating and emergent plant surveys and shoreline habitat surveys. ","Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff completed 137 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 61 habitat surveys. FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities or cold, oxygenated water available for coldwater fishes. FIBI survey information was used by MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for 113 lake assessments in two major watersheds including 39 lakes within the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area. Assessments determine biological condition for identifying lakes considered as impaired, lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and lakes of exceptional biological quality. DNR delivered watershed stressor identification reports for lakes in five watersheds to MPCA for publication. DNR drafted new biological and water quality standards and two technical support documents outlining the science behind the new standards in collaboration with MPCA. The new standards will protect coldwater fishes and their habitat and lakes with exceptionally healthy and diverse fish communities. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports are available on the DNR website, MPCA website, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and in Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,994282,75775,,11,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2021,1250000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. The number of IBI sampling assessments in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide sampling assessments must be proportional to the number of IBI-suitable lakes in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide IBI-suitable lakes. ","Fish: In FY21 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 100 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 50 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. FIBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 106 lakes in six major watersheds following MPCA's watershed schedule including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We will publish stressor identification reports for approximately four watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. FIBI data will be used for prioritization of protection and restoration projects in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will finalize standards and supporting science to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. In FY21 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA for lakes the MPCA will assess in 2021 or 2022. We will survey various lake plant communities across the state including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods. We will continue providing training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect and contribute aquatic plant data. We will also be working on data review and model development for a nearshore aquatic plant IBI. ","Fish: DNR staff completed 117 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 75 shoreline habitat surveys (survey work was reduced due to COVID-19 related staffing and fieldwork limitations). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample game and nongame fish communities in nearshore and deep-water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. FIBI survey information was used by MPCA for 106 lake assessments in six major watersheds including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. Assessments determined biological condition identified impaired lakes lakes vulnerable to future impairment and lakes of exceptional biological quality. We published stressor identification reports for lakes in six watersheds. We drafted standards and technical support documents to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Watershed Plans.   Aquatic Plants: DNR biologists analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to assist with the stressor identification process for lakes that are impaired for biology. Due to COVID-19 restrictions DNR biologists focused efforts on shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands. We completed 13 near-shore plant surveys seven floating and emergent plant surveys and one point-intercept plant survey. These data are used for evaluating shoreland development as a lake stressor. Also because accurate plant identification is essential for these assessments we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that contribute aquatic plant data used to inform the aquatic plant IBI. As COVID-19 related policies prevented in person training sessions we developed web-based modules to facilitate training. ",,,,991375,104796,,8.7,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2020,1250000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. The number of IBI sampling assessments in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide sampling assessments must be proportional to the number of IBI-suitable lakes in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide IBI-suitable lakes. ","In FY20 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 140 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 75 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. FIBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 55 lakes in four major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will publish stressor identification reports for approximately four watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. We will draft standards and supporting science to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. In FY19 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA for lakes scheduled for assessment in 2020 or 2021. Statewide we will survey a variety of lake plant communities including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods and we will continue to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant data. ","Fish: DNR staff completed 72 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 64 shoreline habitat surveys (survey work was reduced due to COVID-19 related fieldwork limitations and a budget cut). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample game and nongame fish communities in nearshore and deep water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. FIBI survey information was used by MPCA for 46 lake assessments in four major watersheds including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. Assessments determined biological condition identified impaired lakes lakes vulnerable to future impairment and lakes of exceptional biological quality. We published stressor identification reports for three watersheds. We worked with MPCA to draft standards and supporting science to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies.   Aquatic Plants: DNR biologists analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine whether lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists conducted surveys at 30 priority lakes to collect the data needed for plant IBI analysis and development. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop plant IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Since accurate plant identification is essential for plant IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that contribute aquatic plant data used to inform the aquatic plant IBI. Because COVID-19 related policies prevented our ability to hold in person training sessions we developed web based training modules to facilitate training opportunities. ",,,,1246102,98444,,15.5,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2019,1250000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments.","Fish: In FY19 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys in lakes. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 75 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. Fish IBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 78 lakes in six major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection. We will produce stressor identification reports for approximately three watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. We will continue to refine fish IBI tools and develop metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY19 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA for lakes the MPCA will assess in 2019 or 2020. Statewide we will survey various lake plant communities including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods. We will continue providing training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect and contribute aquatic plant data.","In FY19 DNR Fisheries staff completed 144 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys on lakes. FIBI surveys sample game and nongame fish communities in nearshore and deep water zones. We conducted 110 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. The MPCA used the FIBI information in watershed assessments for 80 lakes in six major watersheds bringing the total to over 450 lakes assessed. The information was used to determine if the lakes meet standards to identify lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We published stressor identification reports for two additional watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. Finally we continued refining FIBI tools with a focus on developing standards to protect lakes that support cold-water habitat and exceptional fish communities. In FY19 DNR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine—together with information from the fish IBI surveys described above—whether the lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists conducted detailed field surveys at 57 priority lakes that lacked the data needed for plant IBI analysis and development. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop plant IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Since accurate plant identification is essential for plant IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs which has led to the combined sampling of 156 total lakes that will be used for IBI analysis and development.",,,,1335951,100677,,17.5,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2018,1250000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments.","Fish: In FY18 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys including near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish in shallow and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 75 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. Fish IBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 160 lakes in four major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet water quality standards identify and analyze lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS). We will produce stressor ID reports for three watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on Fish IBI scores. We will continue to refine Fish IBI tools and develop metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY18 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA. We will conduct field surveys on about 50 lakes in the North Fork Crow River Snake River and Sauk River watersheds which are scheduled to be assessed by the MPCA in 2019 or 2020. Statewide we will survey a variety of lake plant communities including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods. Finally because accurate plant identification is essential for IBI surveys we will continue to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant data.","Fish: In FY18 DNR biologists completed 160 fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys in lakes. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We also conducted 109 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. The MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) used the resulting information to assess 189 lakes in four major watersheds–specifically to determine whether the lakes meet water quality standards to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection. We produced stressor identification reports for three watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on last year’s fish IBI results. Finally we continued refining fish IBI tools and developing metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY18 DNR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine—together with fish IBI information—whether the lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists conducted detailed surveys at 75 priority lakes to collect the data needed for plant IBI analysis and development. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop plant IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Since accurate plant identification is essential for plant IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that contribute aquatic plant data.",,,,1251130,93268,,16.6,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2017,1300000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","(b) $1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments.","Fish: In FY17 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. About 75 shoreline habitat surveys will be conducted for stressor ID purposes. Fish IBI survey information will be used as part of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)’s watershed assessments for approximately 56 lakes in three major watersheds. Based on the Fish IBI lakes will be designated as impaired or meeting standards. In addition the list of lakes of exceptional biological quality will be updated to help identify which lakes are priorities for protection in the development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will produce stressor ID reports for six watersheds; for about 25 lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on their Fish IBI score. Aquatic Plants: In FY17 EWR biologists will organize analyze and deliver aquatic plant data which the MPCA will use to determine whether lakes are meeting water quality standards. We will continue to provide training and technical support to staff in other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant data and survey shoreline habitat. We will focus plant surveys on lakes Mississippi River-Brainerd Mississippi River – Grand Rapids Ottertail River and Kettle River watersheds. We will conduct intensive detailed field surveys at 20 priority lakes where there are not enough data to do a quality IBI assessment and we will survey shoreline habitat and delineate emergent plant stands on about 50 lakes. This will help us develop additional IBI metrics for non-nutrient stressors.","Fish: In FY17 DNR staff completed 157 Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys of fish. The surveys include near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish in shallow and deep water zones. Staff also conducted 112 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreland activities on fish community metrics. The MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) used the resulting information in watershed assessments for 54 lakes in three major watersheds. The information was used to determine whether the lakes meet water quality standards identify and analyze lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS). DNR staff produced stressor identification reports for six watersheds in which 28 lakes were designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on Fish IBI score. Finally DNR staff continued refining Fish IBI tools and developing metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY17 DNR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine – together with information from the Fish IBI surveys described above—whether the lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists focused on lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd Mississippi River-Sartell Otter Tail River and Kettle River watersheds conducting detailed field surveys at 50 priority lakes that lacked the data needed for IBI analysis. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Finally because accurate plant identification is essential for IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR ",,,,1174294,97900,,15.5,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2016,1300000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","Fish IBI: In FY16 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish index of biological integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. IBI survey information will be used as part of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)’s watershed assessments for approximately 65 lakes in six major watersheds. Lakes will be identified as impaired or as meeting standards based on the fish IBI. In addition the list of lakes of exceptional biological quality will be updated to help identify which lakes are priorities for protection in the development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will continue to produce stressor ID reports; for lakes with poor fish IBI scores; approximately 30 – 40 lakes are likely to be designated as impaired. Aquatic Plant IBI: In FY16 EWR biologists will organize analyze and deliver aquatic plant data which the MPCA will use to determine whether lakes are meeting water quality standards. We will continue to provide training and technical support to staff in other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant and data and do shoreline habitat surveys. We will target intensive detailed field surveys at 13 priority lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd watershed where there is not enough data to do a quality IBI assessment and we will survey shoreline habitat and delineate emergent plant stands on 47 lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd watershed. This will help us develop additional IBI metrics for non-nutrient stressors. ","Fish: In FY16 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. About 75 shoreline habitat surveys will be conducted for stressor ID purposes. Fish IBI survey information will be used as part of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)’s watershed assessments for approximately 56 lakes in three major watersheds. Based on the Fish IBI lakes will be designated as impaired or meeting standards. In addition the list of lakes of exceptional biological quality will be updated to help identify which lakes are priorities for protection in the development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will produce stressor ID reports for six watersheds; for about 25 lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on their Fish IBI score. Aquatic Plants: In FY16 EWR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data which the MPCA used to determine whether lakes are meeting water quality standards. We provided training and technical support to staff in other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant and data and do shoreline habitat surveys. Specifically we trained 51 DNR Fisheries staff in shoreline habitat survey methods and 50 EWR and Fisheries staff in aquatic plant identification. We targeted intensive detailed field surveys at 13 priority lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd North Fork Crow River Crow Wing River and Sauk River watersheds where there were not enough data to do a quality IBI assessment. We surveyed shoreline habitat on 47 lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd Mississippi River-Grand Rapids and Ottertail River watersheds and delineated emergent plant stands on 47 lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd watershed. These data will help us develop additional IBI metrics for non-nutrient stressors.",,,,1165962,155377,,16.7,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2015,1300000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","Fish IBI: In FY15 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish IBI surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. IBI survey information will be used as part of MPCA’s watershed assessments. Using the data collected to date DNR Biologists will work with MPCA to finalize a fish IBI tool for most lake types and develop a Biological Condition Gradient (BCG) Model for Minnesota lakes. We expect to finalize the fish-based IBI and BCG models for most lake types by early 2015. Aquatic Plant IBI: In FY15 DNR biologists will analyze quantitative data collected by DNR Fisheries DNR Wildlife Shallow Lakes Program and DNR EWR's Lakes & Rivers Program as a next step in finalizing an aquatic plant IBI. We will organize analyze and deliver aquatic plant data collected in targeted watersheds for use in MPCA’s watershed assessment process for identifying impaired waters. A manual of standardized aquatic plant survey methods will be completed.","Fish IBI: In FY15 DNR biologists completed 136 fish index of biological integrity (IBI) surveys which included near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. We also finalized four fish IBI tools and established biological impairment thresholds for the fish IBIs. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) used fish IBI survey information in their watershed assessments for 81 lakes in four major watersheds. Based on the fish IBI lakes were determined to be impaired or meeting standards. We also made a list of lakes of exceptional biological quality which is being used to identify protection priorities in MPCA’s Watershed Restorations and Protection Strategies. We took on a new task of determining which factors are contributing to fish IBI impairments on lakes; we drafted 9 stressor ID reports for the MPCA. Aquatic Plant IBI: In FY15 EWR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data on 152 lakes in priority watersheds. A variety of DNR programs collect lake plant data; we used these data for the plant IBI assessments. To help maintain this important data source we finalized survey protocols for aquatic plant IBI assessments wrote a manual of these standardized survey methods and held training workshops for 150 DNR Fish and Wildlife staff involved in lake plant surveys. In addition we did more detailed in-lake surveys on eight priority lakes in the Rum River Watershed where there was not enough existing plant data to calculate an IBI. Biologists surveyed shoreline habitat and/or delineated emergent plant stands on 25 lakes in the Rum River and Mississippi River-Brainerd watersheds We also made progress enhancing software to gather and manage data which will make it easier for more biologists from other DNR programs to survey shoreline habitat and/or delineate emergent plant stands.",,,,956280,96351,,14.1,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2014,1300000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","In FY14 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in the shallow and deep water zones. IBI survey information will be used as part of MPCA’s watershed assessments. Using the data collected to date DNR Biologists will work with MPCA to finalize a fish IBI tool for most lake types and develop a Biological Condition Gradient (BCG) model for Minnesota lakes. We expect to finalize the IBI and BCG models by early 2015. Biologists will also begin work on developing IBI tools for aquatic plants in FY14.","In FY14 DNR biologists completed 124 fish IBI surveys on 121 lakes which include near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish surveys in the shallow and deep water zones. Biologists also developed tools for incorporating fish IBI information into the watershed assessment process in coordination with MPCA. FY14 (primarily summer of 2013) was the first year of transitioning from sampling for tool development to sampling primarily as part of a watershed assessment within the MNPCA schedule. Due to the logistics of working in selected watersheds vs. statewide fewer lakes were sampled. We also increased survey effort on many lakes targeted larger lakes which take more time to sample and added new gear targeting sensitive pelagic fish species on several lakes. In FY14 DNR biologists developed and conducted special IBI vegetation surveys on approximately 20 lakes throughout the state. These surveys were targeted for data collection in the shoreline and near-shore zones where data are currently lacking. Surveys included rapid shoreline habitat assessments delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant beds and quantitative assessments of in-lake plant communities. A centralized database for these data has been created. ",,,,7574287,142024,,11.08,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2013,1150000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1150000 the first year and $1150000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments including assessment of 400 additional lakes and technical analysis to develop an aquatic plant IBI analysis. The commissioner shall work with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency on the development of an assessment tool.","In FY13 DNR biologists will complete approximately 180 fish IBI surveys on 160 lakes including repeat surveys for quality control. Surveys target the entire fish community including nongame and game fish living in the nearshore area and offshore. IBI survey information will be used as part of PCA’s watershed assessments. Biologists will begin work on developing plant IBI tools.","In FY13 DNR biologists completed 146 fish IBI surveys which include near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish surveys in the shallow and deep water zones. Biologists also developed tools for incorporating fish IBI information into the watershed assessment process in coordination with MPCA. The number of surveys was smaller than originally proposed due to changes in study design to add different methods of fish collection (e.g. vertical gill nets small mesh trap nets electrofishing) and improve efficiency and data quality. An unseasonably cool spring caused water temperatures to be too cool to effectively sample near-shore fish communities.",,,,786648,111048,,13.0,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2012,1150000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1150000 the first year and $1150000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments including assessment of 400 additional lakes and technical analysis to develop an aquatic plant IBI analysis. The commissioner shall work with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency on the development of an assessment tool.","In FY12 DNR biologists will complete 200 fish IBI surveys. Surveys target the entire fish community including nongame and game fish living in the nearshore area and offshore. Twenty lakes will receive multiple nearshore surveys per field season for quality control purposes.","In FY12 DNR biologists completed 180 fish IBI surveys on 162 lakes. Surveys target the entire fish community including nongame and game fish living in the nearshore area and offshore Eighteen lakes received additional surveys for quality control purposes. Biologists also developed tools for incorporating fish IBI information into the watershed assessment process in coordination with MPCA.",,,,972395,126390,,14.0,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2011,1178000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY11 DNR biologists will assess 200 lakes for nearshore fish communities along with accompanying littoral zone and pelagic game and nongame fish surveys. Twenty lakes will receive multiple nearshore surveys per field seaon for quality control purposes.","In FY11 DNR biologists completed 228 nearshore assessments on 204 lakes for nearshore fish communities. Littoral and pelagic game and nongame fish surveys were also completed.",,,,1029929,64573,,18.0,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2010,200000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY10 DNR biologists will assess 60 lakes for nearshore nongame fish populations.","In FY10 DNR biologists assessed 22 lakes for nearshore nongame fish populations. DNR Fisheries management staff were trained to do nearshore nongame fish population assessments in preparation for transition of assessment program from the Division of Ecological and Water Resources to the Division of Fish and Wildlife.",,,,,,,,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,,
34203,"Large-lake screening for future watershed protection efforts",2016,34000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Drainage ditch inventory","This project resulted in the installation of 28 preventative practices.","Achieved proposed outcomes",12000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",34140,234,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.44,"Itasca SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Itasca County is about to begin their water plan update process, which will be finished in 2017. This plan will be watershed protection oriented following a similar format to what Crow Wing County has done. We are currently in the process of have lake screening reports completed for 38 Itasca County lakes, and we would like to continue this program to add reports for an additional 34 lakes. After completing the first and this second grant we would have a total 72 of our largest; most developed and used lakes prioritized through a screening process to see which lakes have improving, declining and stable trends. These reports combine a water quality data analysis with a lakeshed analysis to identify priority impacts for each lake, and incorporate water quality projection analyses. This information would be incorporated into our water plan update and guide the next ten years of implementation projects in the county. The Itasca COLA and Itasca Water Legacy Partnership (IWLP) will be partners in gathering past lake data and distributing the reports when completed. The reports will be completed by RMB Environmental Laboratories.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Andy,Arens,"Itasca SWCD","1889 E Hwy 2","Grand Rapids",MN,55744,218-326-0017,andy.arens@itascaswcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Itasca,,"Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/large-lake-screening-future-watershed-proteciton-efforts,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34218,"LMRWMO WRAPS Internal Phosphorus Loading Control: Lake Augusta and Sunfish Lake",2016,196000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project targets internal phosphorus loading to the identified water resources. Using alum treatments, this project proposes to reduce internal phosphorus loading to Lake Augusta and Sunfish Lake by 252 lbs/year and 129 lbs/year, respectively.","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 378 lbs of phosphorus.","achieved proposed outcomes",49000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",196000,8,,,"Lower Mississippi River WMO","Local/Regional Government","Lake Augusta and Sunfish Lake are deep lakes located in the Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization. Both lakes are approximately 40 acres in size and surrounded by watersheds with moderate to low imperviousness. Both lakes are included on the MPCA's 303(d) list as impaired for aquatic recreation due to excessive nutrients. Lake Augusta and Sunfish Lake were included in a watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS) study and total maximum daily load (TMDL) performed from 2012 to 2014. The WRAPS study identified internal loading as the primary source of phosphorus to each lake and recommended in-lake alum treatments to improve water quality in each lake to achieve MPCA water quality standards. The goal of the Lake Augusta and Sunfish Lake alum treatments is to reduce internal phosphorus loading in each lake by at least 80 percent, resulting in phosphorus load reductions of 252 lbs/year in Lake Augusta and 129 lbs/year in Sunfish Lake. These reductions will meet the load reductions identified in the WRAPS and TMDL report and are essentially the only feasible options to achieve MPCA water quality standards in these lakes. The watersheds to these lakes are not densely developed and stormwater best management practices are already present, reducing phosphorus loading to the lakes from external sources. In addition to the alum treatment, the LMRWMO will implement a voluntary rain barrel program, a shoreline buffer survey on Sunfish Lake to identify potential locations for improvements, and targeted communication with residents to encourage buffer enhancement. These efforts will further reduce the phosphorus reaching the lake from external sources. Due to the very limited external load, alum treatment of these lakes is expected to be effective for 20 years or more. The Lake Augusta and Sunfish Lake alum treatment project will be completed in partnership with the Cities of Mendota Heights, Sunfish Lake, and local property owners. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-09-16,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joe,Barten,"Lower Mississippi River WMO","4100 220th Street W, Suite 102",Farmington,MN,55024,651-480-7784,joe.barten@co.dakota.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Dakota,,"Lower Minnesota River , Mississippi River - Twin Cities",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lmrwmo-wraps-internal-phosphorus-loading-control-lake-augusta-and-sunfish-lake,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2022,563000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$563,000 the first year and $563,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies on a watershed scale for use in local comprehensive water planning efforts, to provide resources to local governments for activities that protect sources of drinking water, and to enhance approaches that improve the capacity of local governmental units to protect and restore groundwater resources. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2021,563000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$563,000 the first year and $563,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies on a watershed scale for use in local comprehensive water planning efforts, to provide resources to local governments for activities that protect sources of drinking water, and to enhance approaches that improve the capacity of local governmental units to protect and restore groundwater resources ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2020,550000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 8","$550,000 the first year and $550,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies on a watershed scale for use in local comprehensive water planning efforts, to provide resources to local governments for activities that protect sources of drinking water, and to enhance approaches that improve the capacity of local governmental units to protect and restore groundwater resources. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2019,200000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities.  ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2018,200000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities.  ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,191000,9000,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2017,125000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$125,000 the first year and $125,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,114400,10600,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2016,125000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$125,000 the first year and $125,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities.","The proposed outcomes of 2015 efforts is to complete two GRAPS pilot projects. The pilot projects will a) engage local governments and other stakeholders to gather input on how GRAPS can most effectively support local implementation of activities that protect and improve groundwater and drinking water (including the type, format, and delivery of information), b) determine resources and time needed to complete a GRAPS process in a watershed, and c) evaluate the effectiveness of GRAPS as a local groundwater and drinking water planning tool on a watershed scale.",,,,,106725,18275,,1.2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2015,300000,"M.L. 2014, Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 6","$300,000 in 2015 from the Clean Water Fund is to collaborate with the Board of Water and Soil Resources and local units of government in the North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area, Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area, and Straight River Groundwater Management Area and to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas, in cooperation with the Board of Water and Soil Resources, to meet the sustainability standards of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 103G, including Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.287, subdivision 5, and to be available for the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 103H. The update should identify the most critical areas that need protecting. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased colloboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,256920,43080,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,,
33250,"Long Prairie & Red Eye Watersheds - Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS)",2016,23900,,,,,,,,,,,0.10,"Emmons & Oliver Resources (EOR)","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project is to finalize the Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) and Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategies (WRAPS) for the Red Eye and Long Prairie Watersheds.",,"Long Prairie River Watershed",2015-10-14,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Bonnie E",Finnerty,"MPCA Brainerd Office","7678 College Road, Suite 105",Baxter,MN,56425,"(218) 316-3897",,Assessment/Evaluation,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Douglas, Morrison, Otter Tail, Todd, Wadena",,"Long Prairie River, Redeye River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/long-prairie-red-eye-watersheds-watershed-restoration-protection-strategy-wraps,,,,
34261,"Long Lake Shore Rehabilitation and Stormwater Treatment",2016,25000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Community Partners 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in 0.5 pounds of phosphorus and 3 tons of sediment be removed per year.","This project resulted in estimated reductions of 3 lb. of phosphorus per year and 2 tons of sediment per year",,6250,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",25000,,"Members for Isanti SWCD are: Al Koczur, Barb Kilpatrick, Roger Larsen, Ryan Carpenter, Wayne Calander",,"Isanti SWCD","Local/Regional Government","This project will install practices to improve water quality in Long Lake, Isanti Co. We will install at least 350 linear feet of restored lakeshore and 3,000 sq ft of native plant stormwater treatment with an emphasis on bioengineering techniques, native plants and locating buffers/swales/rain gardens at points of concentrated overland flow into the lake. By targeting properties that are eroding and/or with concentrated overland flow to the lake we will reduce suspended solids discharge by 6,300 lbs/yr and phosphorus by 0.6 lbs/yr. We will also establish emergent native plants which indirectly improve water quality. This project has two purposes. First is to improve water quality in this impaired lake. The area presently has no stormwater treatment. Lakeshore buffers placed at locations with concentrated overland flow to the lake will serve as the only stormwater treatment in the drainage area, achieving large first cut reductions for the entire up-gradient area. Second, the project is part of a larger effort to change the culture of intense lakeshore manicuring that impacts water quality at this lake and others. Grant funds are sought to expand a 7 year-old program by the Long Lake Improvement District (LLID) for near-shore water quality projects. That program has installed 19 projects to date, but present demand exceeds locally available funding. Each project will require an erosion correction component, using bioengineering techniques and native vegetation. The Isanti SWCD will use grant funds to provide a sub-grant to the Long Lake Improvement Association (LLIA) for project installations. The Long Lake Improvement District (LLID) will contribute to the project by providing cash match ($4,800 annually) and managing project installations in cooperation with Hayland Woods Native Nursery. Landowners will provide labor as in-kind match. ",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tiffany,Determan,"Isanti SWCD",,,,,"763-241-1170 x3",tiffany.determan@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Isanti,,"Rum River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/long-lake-shore-rehabilitation-and-stormwater-treatment,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34267,"St. Louis County Imminent Health Threat SSTS Abatement Program",2016,200000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7",,"This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 2789 lbs of BOD5, 68100000000000 CFUs e. Coli, 25 lbs of nitrate, 119 lbs of nitrogen, 243 lbs of phosphorus. Additionally, 1200 preventative pollution practices (with no associated estimation calculator) were installed as part of this grant project.","achieved proposed outcomes",34940,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",200000,12,,,"St. Louis County","Local/Regional Government","St. Louis County's Comprehensive Water Management Plan Update 2010-2020 identifies providing financial assistance to qualifying homeowners to upgrade or replace failing septic systems as a Priority 2 action. Funds from the FY-16 Clean Water Fund Projects and Practices Grant will be used to provide funding to low-income homeowners to repair or replace SSTS identified as Imminent Threat to Public Health (ITPH) within the following watersheds: Lake Superior South, St. Louis River, Cloquet River, Mississippi River-Grand Rapids, Vermilion River, Little Fork, Rainy Lake and Rainy River Headwaters. Those systems identified as straight-piping or surface discharging will receive higher Project priority status, thereby eliminating direct sewage discharge to adjacent water bodies; wetlands, lakes, streams, rivers or groundwater. Homeowners not meeting the minimum qualifications for the St. Louis County (SLC)/MN AgBMP Low-Interest SSTS Loan Program and have incomes below 90% of the median household income for SLC will qualify for grant funding. These low-income homeowners have no other means to finance repair or replacement of the ITPH systems. Currently, SLC Environmental Services Department (ESD) has listed 27 known residential ITPH SSTS identified through point of sale compliance inspections, formal complaints or referred by the Arrowhead Economic Opportunity Agency (AEOA) through their Single Family Rehab Program and Home Investment Partnerships Program. ESD is partnering with the SLC Housing and Rehabilitation Authority (HRA) to contract with the AEOA to process applications and screen homeowners for household income and to administer funding mechanisms to repair or replace the ITPH SSTS. [When the list was developed in 2012, ESD identified 29 families as having ITPH systems, 21 of the systems have been replaced, yet ESD currently has 27 homeowners listed with ITPH systems, demonstrating a need for continued program funding.] ",,,,2020-01-10,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Donna,Oconnor,"St. Louis County",,,,,218-749-0630,oconnord@stlouiscountymn.gov,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"St. Louis",,"Cloquet River, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Little Fork River, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Rainy River - Headwaters, St. Louis River, Vermilion River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/st-louis-county-imminent-health-threat-ssts-abatement-program,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
33253,"Lower MN River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)",2016,53994,,,,,,,,,,,0.2,"Barr Engineering-Minneapolis","For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to develop draft Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) computations for six impaired lakes and two impaired streams, and to provide TMDL development documentation for selected draft TMDL report sections. ",,"Lower Minnesota River Watershed ",2015-11-09,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Christopher G",Zadak,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2837",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Carver, Hennepin",,"Lower Minnesota River ",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lower-mn-river-watershed-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl,,,,
31197,"Lower MN River Watershed Lake Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study",2016,48995,,,,,,,,,,,0.2,"Tetra Tech","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project will develop draft Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies addressing seven impaired lakes in the Lower Minnesota River Watershed (Fish, Pike, O’Dowd, Thole, Schneider, Titlow and Cleary Lakes). TMDLs will describe the impairment in each lake and water quality targets, and will include a phosphorus source assessment, a lake response model and supporting report components that document assumptions and methodologies, and a TMDL equation with completed load allocations, wasteload allocations, and margin of safety for each impairment. This project will provide information and analysis to inform the future development of targeted implementation strategies. ",,"Lower Minnesota River Watershed",2015-09-15,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Christopher,Zadak,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2837",,Assessment/Evaluation,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Scott,,"Lower Minnesota River ",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lower-mn-river-watershed-lake-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-study,,,,
34248,"Mayhew and Big Elk Lake Phosphorus Reduction Program",2016,300000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Projects installed by this grant will reduce phosphorus by approximately 6,846 lbs/yr, nitrogen by 303 lbs/yr, COD by 5,479 lbs/yr, and sediment by 7,938 tons/yr. When combined with other on-going and planned activities this will be a significant step towards the overall watershed goal. ","This project resulted in estimated reductions of 735 lb. of phosphorus per year, 794 tons of sediment per year, 1,389 tons of soil lost per year, and a significant reduction of bacteria entering the water resource of concern.",,75000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",300000,,"Members for Benton SWCD are: Bernard Thole, Charles Rau, Joseph Jordan, Phillip Grosland, Wade Bastian",0.44,"Benton SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Benton SWCD is applying to use Clean Water funds to work with livestock producers in implementing a variety of BMPs including, but not limited to cropland erosion control projects (water and sediment control basins, grade stabilization structures), extending buffers where appropriate to exceed state buffer laws, riparian pasture management and conversion to other uses, nutrient management and feedlot pollution control systems. Our goal is to reduce runoff from these sites and improve water quality within the Mayhew Lake and Big Elk Lake watersheds. The Mayhew Lake Nutrient TMDL (phosphorus) implementation plan has identified several sources of phosphorus as well as strategies and priority areas to reduce phosphorus inputs to the lake. Spring time phosphorus loading was identified as the primary area of concern. The Big Elk Lake TMDL places a high priority on upgrading feedlots with runoff problems. The implementation plan for both TMDLs recognizes the need to assess landowner interest and inventory, plan and design phosphorus reduction projects in high priority work areas, known as Tier 1 and Tier 2 zones. With the help of a BWSR Clean Water Legacy grant the Benton SWCD has spent the last three years working on these assessments. This was time well spent as we have identified numerous projects that will help meet both water quality goals and farmer goals. Many of the water quality projects have also been designed and are awaiting additional assistance. These Clean Water Legacy funds will provide the financial and technical assistance needed to install those projects and will continue assessing other farms in the high priority work areas.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Gerry,Maciej,"Benton SWCD","14 2nd Ave W",Foley,MN,56329,"320-968-5300 x3",gerry@soilandwater.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Benton,,"Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mayhew-and-big-elk-lake-phosphorus-reduction-program,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2021,,N/A,,"This appropriation has now ended. Remaining funds were cancelled due to the May 2020 projected budget shortfall.",,,,,,,,,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2020,,N/A,,"In FY20 the DNR proposes to drill two additional wells monitoring deep bedrock aquifers install two additional data loggers for continuous groundwater level monitoring. DNR will continue to review and publish annual continuous records for the groundwater level monitoring wells in the metro area. DNR will continue to work with SWCD’s in the 11 County Metro Area to aid in our enhanced groundwater monitoring efforts. Plans also include website upgrades to provide data to the website directly from the new hydrologic database. ","In FY20 the DNR acquired 3 shallow aquifer wells from the USGS. Three new data loggers were installed for continuous groundwater level monitoring. DNR reviewed and published continuous water level records for monitoring wells in the metro area. All SWCD’s in the 11 County Metro Area participated in the enhanced groundwater monitoring efforts and uploaded data into the new DNR/PCA cooperative water quantity data management system. The website was upgraded to connect with the new hydrologic database. ",,,,174357,,,2,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2019,,N/A,,"In FY19 the DNR proposes to drill two additional wells in the deep aquifers and install five additional data loggers for continuous groundwater level monitoring. The DNR will continue to refine and expand the groundwater animations to visualize the continuously changing groundwater levels providing a better understanding of water use and aquifer responses in the 11-County Metro Area. DNR will continue to review and publish the annual continuous records for the groundwater level monitoring wells in the metro area.","In FY19 the DNR installed 2 deep aquifer bedrock wells. Thirteen new data loggers were installed for continuous groundwater level monitoring. DNR reviewed and published continuous water level records for monitoring wells in the metro area. All SWCD’s in the 11 County Metro Area participated in the enhanced groundwater monitoring efforts and uploaded data into the new DNR/PCA cooperative water quantity data management system.",,,,252276,74014,,2.4,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2018,,N/A,,"In FY18 DNR proposes to drill five additional wells in the shallow aquifers and install five additional data loggers for continuous groundwater level monitoring. The DNR will continue to refine and expand the groundwater animations to visualize the continuously changing groundwater levels and provide a better understanding of water use and aquifer responses in the 11 County Metro Area. All SWCDs in the 11 County Area will participate in the pilot monitoring partnership in FY18 and a new data system will come on line.","In FY18 the DNR reviewed and published continuous water level records for monitoring wells in the metro area. DNR also developed a metro area water level animation to show monthly changes from 2012-2017. All SWCDs in the 11 County Area participate in the enhanced groundwater monitoring efforts and upload the data into the new DNR/PCA cooperative water quantity data management system. No wells were added to the network in the metro area in FY18 due to limited availability of public property in priority areas.",,,,257210,,,2.7,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2017,,N/A,,"In FY17 the DNR will continue enhancing the processing and accessibility of groundwater network data. Enhancements will include streamlining the gathering storage and online accessibility of data for required groundwater monitoring permits in the 11-county metro and outstate areas with high groundwater appropriation volumes. Additional wells will fill some of the few remaining gaps in the metro groundwater monitoring network and a large effort will begin to transfer data into a new system better equipped to handle these large data sets.","In FY17 DNR installed 15 wells in the metro area including 12 to measure water levels in the deeper aquifers. Twenty new data loggers were installed to continuously measure groundwater levels bringing the total number of instrumented wells in the 11 county area to 216. Our local partner pilot program now includes 10 of the 11 metro county Soil and Water Conservations Districts (SWCD). These partnering SWCDs assist the state in measuring and downloading data in many of the wells in the metro area. The DNR compiled 134 continuous records of groundwater levels and developed a process to show animated changing groundwater levels in the area. The current animation shows monthly changes from 2012-2016. Work began to migrate all groundwater related data to a new data management system.",,,,544050,,,2.9,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2016,,N/A,,"In FY16 the DNR will continue to refine processes and compile continuous records for wells with data loggers. We will replace older model monitoring equipment with state of the art continuous monitoring equipment install additional wells and expand automated Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) data gathering with metro communities focusing on the northeast metro. SCADA information is continuous groundwater use and water level data from a community’s production and monitoring wells managed by a computerized control system. SCADA systems are water supply management systems already in place in most communities. The fact that the DNR can now get this data automatically means that we get better reporting of community water use we can use existing data networks which saves the state money on monitoring costs and that we better understand groundwater use from multiple communities in localized areas.","In FY16 all continuous monitoring equipment was upgraded at existing locations and an additional 132 wells were instrumented with new equipment. Upgrades to the data importing system allowed a more consistent and streamlined process for data entry and storage. The data processing upgrades now allow public access to raw data gathered from the field within two days of data downloads. One additional SCADA system was added to the metro monitoring system. This further enhances the reporting of community water use and reduces monitoring costs through the use of existing community groundwater monitoring.",,,,250690,10793,,2.7,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2015,,N/A,,"In FY15 DNR hydrologists will continue to grow the 11-county monitoring well network by installing 21 monitoring wells 16 of which will be deep wells in bedrock. Additional data analysis will result in better information about aquifer characteristics and trends to be used in groundwater management decisions. The DNR also proposes to add an additional municipality into the automated groundwater data collection project.","In FY15 the DNR installed equipment at White Bear Lake to provide real time water level rain fall and ground water levels from five groundwater observation wells surrounding the lake. These data will provide the public with up to date water level information and improve the understanding of surface and groundwater interactions in the Northeast Metro. We also installed 27 deep aquifer wells instrumented 59 monitoring wells with continuous water level monitoring equipment and compiled 118 annual records for groundwater level monitoring. These records improve understanding about groundwater levels interaction between aquifers and how aquifer levels respond to groundwater use in the 11 County Metro Area – information that is essential for providing sustainable water supplies for people and ecosystems.",,,,410268,,,2.5,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2014,,N/A,,"In FY14 DNR scientists will continue to grow the 11-county monitoring well network by installing 15 monitoring wells 7 of which will be deep wells in bedrock. Additional data analysis will result in better information about aquifer characteristics and trends to be used in groundwater management decisions. The DNR also proposes to further identify the flow patterns and aquifer characteristics within the 11 County Metro through water chemistry sampling and hydraulic testing a subset of the monitoring wells.","In FY14 DNR scientists installed 15 aquifer monitoring wells including 10 in deep bedrock aquifers. Through the well installation process scientists were able to gather valuable information about the bedrock geology and aquifers in the Twin Cities Metro Area. DNR scientists also equipped these 15 new wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. Scientist compiled and completed continuous water level records for 36 wells with continuous data loggers. These wells and data provide information about regionally important aquifers that will improve future management decisions. In FY 14 scientists completed the migration of groundwater data into a state cooperative water data system. The pilot project to test the collection of real-time automated municipal groundwater data continued adding an additional municipality (water level and pumping data from 21 municipal wells used in the community). The public display of these data is under development. When established this public display of groundwater level information will help state scientists and communities better understand local and regional water use and manage future needs.",,,,246082,15045,,2.5,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2013,,N/A,,"In FY13 DNR scientists will continue to grow the 11-county monitoring well network by installing 20 monitoring wells 10 of which will be deep wells in bedrock. Additional data analysis will result in better information about aquifer characteristics and trends to be used in groundwater management decisions.","In FY13 DNR scientists installed 15 aquifer monitoring wells including 4 in deep bedrock aquifers. A change in the field manager for this project resulted in a decrease in well installation from the FY13 target. Through the well installation process scientists were able to gather valuable information about the bedrock geology and aquifers in the Twin Cities Metro Area. Staff also equipped 25 new and existing wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. These wells and data provide information about regionally important aquifers that will improve future management decisions. In FY 13 work continued on the migration of groundwater data into a state cooperative water data system. The pilot project to test the collection of real-time automated municipal groundwater data was completed with one municipality (water level and pumping data from 9 municipal wells) and initiated with a second municipality. The public display of these data is under development. When established this public display of groundwater level information will help state scientists and communities better understand local and regional water use and manage future needs.",,,,516651,74970,,2.3,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2012,1000000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$1000000 the first year is for implementation of the metropolitan groundwater monitoring and protection activities under Minnesota Laws 2010 chapter 361 article 2 section 4 subdivision 2.","In FY12 DNR scientists will continue establishing a network of monitoring wells in the 11-county metropolitan area to provide information about aquifer characteristics and trends. Staff will install 20 new wells and equip 40 new and existing wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. DNR will also grow our ability to evaluate changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells by installing deep aquifer monitoring wells in the Mt. Simon Aquifer when opportunities arise. The goal for this work is one well per year. Another goal for this program is to complete development of and implement a new automated data management system that will provide better data management and integrate groundwater and surface water data. ","In FY12 DNR scientists installed 28 aquifer monitoring wells including 14 in deep aquifers (installed in bedrock). Through the well installation process scientists were able to gather more and better valuable information about bedrock geology in the Twin Cities Metro Area. Staff equipped 146 new and existing wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. These wells and data loggers provide information about aquifers stressed from pumping providing managers with better information for management decisions. Work began on the migration of data from observations wells (groundwater data) into the surface water data system in order to integrate these two important data sets. A pilot project is underway to test real time automated data collection storage and public display of groundwater data.",,,,570997,142026,,2.5,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2011,4000000,"M.L. 2010 Ch. 361 Art. 2 Sec. 4","The $5000000 appropriated in Laws 2009 chapter 172 article 2 section 4 paragraph (m) for activities relating to groundwater protection or prevention of groundwater degradation is canceled and $4000000 is appropriated in fiscal year 2011 to the commissioner of natural resources for the following purposes: (1) establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11-county metropolitan area that monitors non-stressed systems to provide information on aquifer characteristics and natural water level trends; and (2) develop an automated data system to capture groundwater level and water use data to enhance the evaluation of water resource changes in aquifer systems that are stressed by pumping of existing wells. This is a onetime appropriation and is available until spent. The base funding for this program in fiscal year 2012 is $1000000 and $0 in fiscal year 2013.","In FY11 DNR scientists will establish a network of monitoring wells in the 11-county metropolitan area to provide information about aquifer characteristics and trends. Staff will equip 70 new and existing wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. DNR will also grow our ability to evaluate changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells by installing deep aquifer monitoring wells in the Mt. Simon Aquifer when opportunities arise. The goal for this work is one well per year. Another goal for this program is setting up a new automated data management system that will provide better data management and integrate groundwater and surface water data.","In FY11 DNR scientists installed 14 new monitoring wells in the 11-county metropolitan area and equipped 70 new and existing wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. The DNR installed 3 deep aquifer monitoring wells in the Mt. Simon Aquifer. The DNR began work on moving observation well database to a new data system and acquired a new data system to provide store and process groundwater data for use by state and local agencies. This is a cooperative effort between MPCA and the DNR. Initiated pilot project with the Cities of New Brighton Lakeville and Lakeland to develop a mechanism to collect automated water use and ground water level data to provide better water use and availability information for local communities and state needs. ",,,,488836,32400,,,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,,
34220,"Middle Fork Zumbro River Critical Source Area Restoration",2016,140925,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The practices proposed in this project are estimated to achieve a reduction of 50-96 tons of TSS/yr. ","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 53.79 pounds of Phosphorus, 53.79 tons of Sediment, 262.29 tons of Soil Loss. ","achieved some of the proposed outcomes ",11854,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",40120,4577,"Members for Dodge SWCD are: Bill Thompson, David Livingston, Don Heser, Glenn Hahn, Larry Scherger",0.27,"Dodge SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Middle Fork Zumbro River Critical Source Area Restoration Clean Water Fund grant will focus on the implementation of six to eight of the 23 identified and ranked sediment reducing conservation practices identified in two targeted sub-watersheds of the Middle Fork Zumbro River. These six to eight projects will work towards achieving an estimated 49-96 tons of TSS to the impaired Middle Fork Zumbro River and are imperative to the health of the Middle Fork Zumbro River and Lake Zumbro. Partnering with the Dodge Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) is the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and the Zumbro Watershed Partnership (ZWP). ",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Adam,King,"Dodge SWCD","916 2nd St SE","Dodge Center",MN,559279601,"507-374-6364 x 3",adam.king@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Dodge,,"Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/middle-fork-zumbro-river-critical-source-area-restoration,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Annie Felix-Gerth",
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2020,250000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 8","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for evaluating and addressing the risks from viruses, bacteria, and protozoa in groundwater supplies and for evaluating land uses that may contribute to contamination of public water systems with these pathogens. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2019,100000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for evaluating and addressing the risks from viruses in water supplies. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2018,100000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for evaluating and addressing the risks from viruses in water supplies. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2017,75000,,"275,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2016,275000,,"275,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2015,800000,"MN Law 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 8(g)","$800,000 the first year and $800,000 second year are for the development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2017. ","-An estimated virus occurrence rate in Minnesota's public water supply wells -Knowledge of virus occurrence and associations with critical factors and indicators -Enhanced groundwater microbial risk management guidance -Guidance to public water systems on how to implement risk management measures if pathogens are present ",,,,,685120,114880,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2014,800000,"MN Law 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 8(g)","$800,000 the first year and $800,000 second year are for the development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2017. ",,,,66000,"United States Geological Survey (USGS) ",800000,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,,
33248,"Minnesota River Headwaters Watershed Project - Phase 2",2016,228013,,,,,,,,,,,2.48,"Upper Minnesota River Watershed District","Local/Regional Government","The goal of this project is to develop a Watershed Restoration and Protection Plan (WRAPS) to be used at the local level. It will increase the number of citizens participating in education and outreach events; foster information and idea exchange around watershed issues through relationships and social networks; involve community members in crafting civic engagement activities/plans in which they feel ownership and desire to implement; and promote awareness, concern, and watershed stewardship to community organizations/institutions.",,"Mississippi River - Headwaters Watershed ",2015-10-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Dianne,Radermacher,"Upper Minnesota River Watershed District","211 2nd Street SE",Ortonville,MN,56278,"(320) 839-3411",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Big Stone, Chippewa, Lac qui Parle, Stevens, Swift, Traverse",,"Mississippi River - Headwaters",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-river-headwaters-watershed-project-phase-2,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2015,1006016,,,,,,,,,,,10.06,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2016,949674,,,,,,,,,,,9.5,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2017,857306,,,,,,,,,,,8.57,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2018,671276,,,,,,,,,,,6.71,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2019,627518,,,,,,,,,,,6.26,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2020,557216,,,,,,,,,,,5.57,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2021,406073,,,,,,,,,,,4.06,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2022,526159,,,,,,,,,,,5.26,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2023,524139,,,,,,,,,,,5.2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2024,802930,,,,,,,,,,,8,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2025,3500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (f) $3,500,000 the first year and $3,500,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2024,3500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (f) $3,500,000 the first year and $3,500,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","The following measures are cumulative over the life of the program. As of June 30, 2024: 1,511 certified farms 1,036,362 current certified acres 2,929 NEW best management practices $92,985,493 has been leveraged ",,3985089,,3179150,237749,,6.43,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2023,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","As of June 30, 2023: 1,374 certified farms 938,851 certified acres 2,239 NEW best management practices 41 partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP $22,100,041 have been leveraged  ",,3652458,,2784558,245618,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2022,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","As of June 20, 2022: 1,240 certified farms 892,578 certified acres 2,478 NEW best management practices 38 partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP $18,466,583 have been leveraged  ",,2804342,,2589035,218389,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2021,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2024. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","See the most recent fiscal year for current measures. ",,2322917,,2527276,270880,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2020,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2024. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","As of December 7, 2020: 977 certified farms 685,767 certified acres 1,998 NEW Best Management Practices 30 partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP $13,319,324 have been leveraged ",,2173217,,2388875,223105,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2019,3000000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (g) $2,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2021. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,2235826,,2200855,188333,,5.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2018,2000000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (g) $2,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2021 ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","At the end of December 2018: Over 690 certified farms More than 449,000 certified acres 1328 NEW Best Management Practices, saving 127 million pounds of soil per year and reducing nitrogen and phosphorus losses. 55-65% of program funds are passed through to local government units and participating farmers: The program is leveraging over $9 million in federal funding to enhance programs in Minnesota ",,2075640,,2217983,221531,,5.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2017,2500000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3S F2527 REVISOR CKM S2527-2 2nd Engrossment (05/22/2016) Starting on line 66.29 ","M.L. 2015: (g) $2,500,000 the first year is and $2,500,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. The commissioner of agriculture shall consult with the United States Department of Agriculture to determine whether other state spending would qualify as a match for the agricultural water quality certification program funds available from the federal government. By January 1, 2016, the commissioner shall submit a report on funding recommendations to the Clean Water Council and the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over agriculture, the  environment and natural resources, and the clean water fund. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2019. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,1982130,,2060920,195404,,5.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2016,2500000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (g) $2,500,000 the first year is to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. The commissioner of agriculture shall consult with the United States Department of Agriculture to determine whether other state spending would qualify as a match for the agricultural water quality certification program funds available from the federal government. By January 1, 2016, the commissioner shall submit a report on funding recommendations to the Clean Water Council and the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over agriculture, the environment and natural resources, and the clean water fund. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2016, and the commissioner may request additional funding for this program for fiscal year 2017. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","• 327 certified farms • 188,153 certified acres • 555 NEW Best Management Practices 65% of program funds are passed through to local government units: -The program is leveraging over $9 million in federal funding to enhance programs in Minnesota. -The program is supporting 8 non-MDA positions. ",,1800000,,1803394,222364,,5.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2015,1500000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (g) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are to implement a Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Measurable outcomes are reported in fiscal year 2014 ","Measurable outcomes are reported in fiscal year 2014 ",,1501256,"$9M NRCS Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP)$100,000 McKnight Foundation$3M dedicated EQIP funding pool ",710340,180563,,3.75,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2014,1500000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (g) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are to implement a Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Measureable outcomes were proposed in fiscal year 2012 and have remained consistent. ","• Number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and other stakeholders at field days, presentations and other education events (Over 120 meetings, events, fields days, and presentations at conferences and tradeshows)• Number of farmers participating in the MAWQCP in each pilot area within the term of the pilot program (31 certified farms, 12,861 acres)• Number of conservation practices implemented (84)• Number of partners involved in local pilots’ activities (15)Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, Wilkin County SWCD, West Otter Tail County SWCD, Whitewater River Watershed Project, Wabasha County SWCD, Winona County SWCD, Olmsted County SWCD, Rural Advantage, Martin County SWCD, Jackson County SWCD, Cottonwood County SWCD, Watonwan County SWCD, Faribault County SWCD, Greater Blue Earth River Basin Alliance, Stearn County SWCD• Amount of money leveraged by the MAWQCP ($12.1 million) ",,1501256,,276712,49598,,"3.75 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2013,132830,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2011: (d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Measureable outcomes were proposed in fiscal year 2012 and have remained consistent. ","These measures are reported as a cumulative over the years of the program. For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,50000,,,132830,,0.85,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2012,173380,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","The MDA is tracking the following information: Number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and other stakeholders at field days, presentations and other education events Number of farmers participating in the MAWQCP in each pilot area within the term of the pilot program Number of conservation practices implemented Number of partners involved in local pilots’ activities Amount of money leveraged by the MAWQCP Upon two-years of pilot operation: a. Have developed an agricultural operation assessment process that functionally addresses water quality impacts and incorporates a process for revisions as practices, management and technology changes become established and approved.  ","Measurable outcomes are reported in fiscal year 2014. These measures are reported as a cumulative over the years of the program. For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,,"Additional federal and state resources for this program will be identified by the advisory committee as well as the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. ",,,,0.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2025,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development or support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2024,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development or support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ","The following numbers are cumulative from FY18 through FY24. As of June 30, 2024 the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library has: 3,840 publications (diverse research articles and scientific reports) 32,700 website visitors 5,046 PDF downloads ",,,,48674,6136,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2023,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development for support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,,56405,7846,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2022,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development for support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. ",," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,36129,4448,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2021,50000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","(e) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,,34849,4722,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2020,50000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (e) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","The following measures are reported cumulatively, as of 11/12/2020: 3,251 publications are available online 13,918 visitors have visited the site  13,031 searches were conducted 3,871 publications were downloaded ",,,,33132,4970,,0.6,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2019,50000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022 "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,38523,3302,,0.6,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2018,50000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","As of January 3, 2019: 2915 publications available Estimated number of website visitors: Since inception: Total = 10,001 2018:  Total = 1500   Estimated number of search sessions: Since inception: 11,458 2018:  2957 Estimated Number of pdf downloads: Since inception: 3576 2018:  614 ",,,,61488,7420,,0.6,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2017,50000,"M.L. 2015: 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for the most up to date information. ",,,,48895,7316,,0.3,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2016,50000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3 ","M.L. 2015: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","For Fiscal Year 2016: Number of publications: 1,393 Number of website visitors New visitors: 2,561 Total visitors: 2,885 Number of search sessions conducted: 2,885 Number of PDF downloads: 535 ",,,,9119,6497,,0.3,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2015,150000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (f) $100,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Any information technology development or support or costs necessary for this research inventory database will be incorporated into the agency's service level agreement with and paid to the Office of Enterprise Technology. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","For Fiscal Year 2015: Number of publications: 1,376 Number of website visitors New visitors: 2,590 Total visitors: 3,419 Number of search sessions conducted: 3,423 Number of PDF downloads: 639 ",,,,66584,35474,"Groups represented by the Steering Team (September 2014- Current): • Buffalo-Red Watershed District Board • Freshwater Society • Metropolitan Council • Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources • Minnesota Corn Growers • Minnesota Department of Agriculture • Minnesota Department of Health • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Minnesota State University Water Resource Center • Mississippi Watershed Management Organization • Pelican River Watershed District • U.S. Geological Survey - Minnesota Water Science Center • University of Minnesota Libraries • University of Minnesota Water Resources Center • Washington County Conservation District * this is a voluntary steering committee, not a board",1,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2014,100000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (f) $100,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Any information technology development or support or costs necessary for this research inventory database will be incorporated into the agency's service level agreement with and paid to the Office of Enterprise Technology. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","In FY14, MDA staff completed development and performance testing of the MnWRL website and populated the website with diverse water research publciations. The website went live with over 1,000 articles searchable by the public. MDA staff also established a diverse Steering Team to help guide MnWRL’s long-term growth and maintenance. Number of publications (1,361) Estimated number of website visitors (2,257) Estimated number of search sessions conducted (1,219) Estimated number of new webiste visitors (679) Number of article downloads (396) ",,,,114514,16309,"Groups represented by the Advisory Committee (May 2011- December 2013): • EOR Inc. • Houston Engineering • Keiser & Associates LLC • Metropolitan Council • Minnesota Agricultural Water Resources Center • Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources • Minnesota Corn Growers • Minnesota Department of Agriculture • Minnesota Department of Health • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Minnesota State University Water Resource Center • Mississippi Watershed Management Organization • Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District • U.S. Geological Survey - Minnesota Water Science Center • University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics • University of Minnesota Department of Soil Water & Climate • University of Minnesota Libraries • University of Minnesota Water Resources Center • USDA Agricultural Research Service • Washington County Conservation District * this is a voluntary advisory committee, not a board",1,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2013,175000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (f) $175,000 the first year and $175,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for the most up to date information. ",,,,,2700,"See Fiscal Year 2014","1 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2012,175000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (f) $175,000 the first year and $175,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,,810,"See Fiscal Year 2014",0.3,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2010,85000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (d) $695,000 the first year and $1,570,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance related to ways agricultural practices contribute to restoring impaired waters and assist with the development of TMDL plans. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,,,"See Fiscal Year 2014",,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,,
10008291,"Mississippi Headwaters Board Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling",2016,49712,,,,,,,,,,,.32,"Mississippi Headwaters Board","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at four subwatershed sites and one basin site in 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. Water chemistry monitoring will be conducted at a wide range of flow conditions with emphasis of collecting samples during periods of moderate and high flows after runoff events, as defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. The pollutant load calculations will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-03-21,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Tim,Terrill,"Mississippi Headwaters Board","322 Laurel Street",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 824-1189",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Benton, Morrison, Todd",,"Long Prairie River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Sartell",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-headwaters-board-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-wplmn-sampling,,,,
10008291,"Mississippi Headwaters Board Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling",2018,45469,,,,,,,,,,,.32,"Mississippi Headwaters Board","Non-Profit Business/Entity","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at four subwatershed sites and one basin site in 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019. Water chemistry monitoring will be conducted at a wide range of flow conditions with emphasis of collecting samples during periods of moderate and high flows after runoff events, as defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. The pollutant load calculations will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-03-21,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Tim,Terrill,"Mississippi Headwaters Board","322 Laurel Street",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 824-1189",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Benton, Morrison, Todd",,"Long Prairie River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Sartell",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-headwaters-board-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-wplmn-sampling,,,,
10008288,"Mississippi River (St. Cloud) Watershed Partnership Monitoring",2016,41903,,,,,,,,,,,.24,"Sherburne SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at three subwatershed sites in 2016-2019 and ongoing as needed in based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Francine,Larson,"Sherburne SWCD","14855 Hwy 10","Elk River",MN,55330,"(763) 241-1170",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Sherburne, Wright",,"Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Rum River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-st-cloud-watershed-partnership-monitoring,,,,
10008288,"Mississippi River (St. Cloud) Watershed Partnership Monitoring",2019,9684,,,,,,,,,,,.08,"Sherburne SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at three subwatershed sites in 2016-2019 and ongoing as needed in based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Francine,Larson,"Sherburne SWCD","14855 Hwy 10","Elk River",MN,55330,"(763) 241-1170",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Sherburne, Wright",,"Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Rum River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-st-cloud-watershed-partnership-monitoring,,,,
10008288,"Mississippi River (St. Cloud) Watershed Partnership Monitoring",2020,1745,,,,,,,,,,,.02,"Sherburne SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at three subwatershed sites in 2016-2019 and ongoing as needed in based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Francine,Larson,"Sherburne SWCD","14855 Hwy 10","Elk River",MN,55330,"(763) 241-1170",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Sherburne, Wright",,"Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Rum River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-st-cloud-watershed-partnership-monitoring,,,,
10008288,"Mississippi River (St. Cloud) Watershed Partnership Monitoring",2021,6791,,,,,,,,,,,.09,"Sherburne SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at three subwatershed sites in 2016-2019 and ongoing as needed in based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Francine,Larson,"Sherburne SWCD","14855 Hwy 10","Elk River",MN,55330,"(763) 241-1170",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Sherburne, Wright",,"Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Rum River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-st-cloud-watershed-partnership-monitoring,,,,
10008288,"Mississippi River (St. Cloud) Watershed Partnership Monitoring",2022,37903,,,,,,,,,,,.09,"Sherburne SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at three subwatershed sites in 2016-2019 and ongoing as needed in based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Francine,Larson,"Sherburne SWCD","14855 Hwy 10","Elk River",MN,55330,"(763) 241-1170",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Sherburne, Wright",,"Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Rum River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-st-cloud-watershed-partnership-monitoring,,,,
10008288,"Mississippi River (St. Cloud) Watershed Partnership Monitoring",2024,30277,,,,,,,,,,,.11,"Sherburne SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at three subwatershed sites in 2016-2019 and ongoing as needed in based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Francine,Larson,"Sherburne SWCD","14855 Hwy 10","Elk River",MN,55330,"(763) 241-1170",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Sherburne, Wright",,"Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Rum River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-st-cloud-watershed-partnership-monitoring,,,,
10008288,"Mississippi River (St. Cloud) Watershed Partnership Monitoring",2025,12000,,,,,,,,,,,.11,"Sherburne SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at three subwatershed sites in 2016-2019 and ongoing as needed in based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Francine,Larson,"Sherburne SWCD","14855 Hwy 10","Elk River",MN,55330,"(763) 241-1170",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Sherburne, Wright",,"Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Rum River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-st-cloud-watershed-partnership-monitoring,,,,
34300,"Mississippi River Grand Rapids Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) - Phase II",2016,200000,,,,,,,,,,,1.22,"Aitkin County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","This project will focus on creating a watershed identity, monitoring & assessment, stressor ID assistance, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) report development, Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) report development, watershed prioritization and targeting, and the continuation of the Civic Engagement components of the project. Currently, this watershed has seven listed conventional impairments (Lake Eutrophication); however, it is possible that additional stream impairments (up to four) may be identified during the IWM process. Additional impairments identified later, beyond those previously mentioned, will be a priority in the WRAPS and more thoroughly addressed in cycle II of the intensive watershed monitoring cycle (2025). Through the IWM process, this will be the first time this watershed will be fully monitored for biological health indicators.",,"Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Watershed ",2016-01-01,2020-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,,,"Aitkin County Soil and Water Conservation District","130 Southgate Drive",Aitkin,MN,56431,"(218) 927-6565",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Aitkin,,"Mississippi River - Grand Rapids",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-grand-rapids-watershed-restoration-protection-strategy-wraps-phase-ii,,,,
33487,"Mississippi River Vegetation Sampling",2016,13000,,,,,,,,,,,0.10,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","State Government","This project will assist in assessing the quality of the Mississippi River bordering with Wisconsin in partnership with the Minnesota DNR (MNDNR), the Wisconsin DNR (WIDNR) and the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services (MCES). Sampling will be conducted in 2016 using water chemistry and biological indicators, using a 5 state strategy recently developed recently with the leadership of the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association. The Minnesota entities will focus their work on the River from St Anthony Falls to the Chippewa River confluence in Lake Pepin. The Wisconsin DNR will focus their work in the reach below ending at the Root River confluence near La Crosse. This contract provides for the submerged aquatic vegetation indictor for the Minnesota portion.",,,2016-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Megan,Moore,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2422",,Assessment/Evaluation,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-vegetation-sampling,,,,
33488,"Mississippi River Brainderd Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) - Phase I",2016,44678,,,,,,,,,,,.35,"Aitkin County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government",,,,2015-12-21,2019-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,,,"Aitkin County Soil and Water Conservation District","130 Southgate Drive",Aitkin,MN,56431,"(218) 927-6565",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Aitkin,,"Mississippi River - Brainerd",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-brainderd-watershed-restoration-protection-strategy-wraps-phase-i,,,,
33489,"Mississippi River Sartel Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) - Phase I",2016,30000,,,,,,,,,,,.26,"Morrison Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","Phase 1 of this project is primarily geared towards project planning and coordination among project partners, developing an initial civic engagement strategic plan, holding a watershed kick-off meeting, and gathering and summarizing available water quality data. ",,"Mississippi River - Sartell Watershed ",2016-03-01,2017-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,,,"Morrison Soil and Water Conservation District","16776 Heron Road","Little Falls",MN,56345,"(320) 616-2479",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring, Planning, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Benton, Crow Wing, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Stearns, Todd",,"Mississippi River - Sartell",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-sartel-watershed-restoration-protection-strategy-wraps-phase-i,,,,
34232,"Mississippi River Winona Watershed Planning Framework",2016,32560,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in GIS-generated maps that will be available to local SWCD staff that will inform decision-making for interested landowners ","Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework completed on 8 subwatersheds in the Mississippi River Watershed. Results ground-trothed with areas having a high number of structural practices and farmer feedback solicited.","achieved proposed outcomes",8140,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",32560,2,,0.17,"Whitewater River Watershed Project","Local/Regional Government","This project proposes utilizing a precision conservation framework to assess two small impaired agricultural watersheds (HUC12) to determine optimal locations of best management practices and structures on the landscape that will address local water quality issues in a more strategic manner. The watershed assessment process will create GIS-generated maps that will be available to local SWCD staff that will inform decision-making for interested landowners. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-03-23,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Sheila,Harmes,"Whitewater River Watershed Project","Finance Department",Winona,MN,55987,507-457-6522,sharmes@co.winona.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Olmsted, Wabasha, Winona",,"Mississippi River - Winona",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mississippi-river-winona-watershed-planning-framework,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
33827,"Missouri River Basin - Rock River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Study",2016,39912,,,,,,,,,,,0.17,"Wenck Associates, Inc.","For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to develop Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocations and complete a final draft TMDL report for the 29 stream impairments listed in the Missouri River Basin. The project will produce completed models and pollutant source assessments for each impairment parameter, and a draft TMDL report that summarizes results of these analyses and TMDL allocations for each stream.",,"Rock River Watershed",2016-03-01,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mark,Hanson,"MPCA Marshall Office","504 Fairgrounds Rd, Suite 200",Marshall,MN,56258,"(507) 476-4259",,Assessment/Evaluation,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Jackson, Nobles",,"Rock River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/missouri-river-basin-rock-river-watershed-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-study,,,,
33826,"Model Relationship Between Sulfate and Sulfide in Wild Rice Habitats",2016,5000,,,,,,,,,,,0.01,"Aqua Lux Lucis, Inc.","For-Profit Business/Entity","Using data supplied by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), this project will model the relationship between sulfate and sulfide in wild rice habitats.",,,2016-03-01,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Edward,Swain,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 7572772",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/model-relationship-between-sulfate-and-sulfide-wild-rice-habitats,,,,
33408,Monticello,2016,1165043,"MS Section 446A.073","Point Source Implementation Grant Program","Reduce wastewater phosphorus discharge to 1 mg/L or less","Reduce wastewater phosphorus discharge to 1 mg/L or less",,1165043,"PFA loan",,,,,"Monticello, City of","Local/Regional Government","Construct wastewater treatment improvements to meet more stingent discharge requirements",,,2015-07-14,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jeff,Freeman,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority","332 Minnesota Street, Suite W820","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 259-7465",jeff.freeman@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority ",,Wright,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/monticello,,,,
34242,"Moody Lake Wetland Rehabilitation",2016,429284,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Targeted drainage system analysis","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 445 lbs of phosphorus.","Achieved proposed outcomes",2306,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",9225,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.05,"Comfort Lake-Forest Lake WD","Local/Regional Government","Moody Lake is the headwaters of the Comfort Lake-Forest Lake Watershed District northern flow network, and as such, its water quality sets the stage for downstream waters, particularly Bone Lake, Comfort Lake, the Sunrise River, and ultimately Lake St. Croix. A multi-year diagnostic and implementation feasibility study was conducted in the Moody Lake watershed to prioritize nutrient sources, target cost-effective BMPs, and estimate the measurable phosphorus reductions that will be achieved through implementation of these projects. Through this process, the District was able to eliminate the targeting of BMPs in two-thirds of the watershed which was not found to be a phosphorus problem, and focused the targeting of BMPs at specific locations within the remaining one-third of the watershed known to be a phosphorus problem. In addition, the District is implementing the three proposed wetland rehabilitations systematically in order from upstream to downstream and then from less intensive to more intensive treatment. Three phases of winter wetland rehabilitation implementation are proposed, followed by spring and summer monitoring to determine the effectiveness of each implementation phase and whether proceeding to the next phase of implementation is necessary to achieve the phosphorus reduction goal. Rehabilitating the degraded wetlands in the northwest portion of the watershed is expected to achieve 80% of the watershed phosphorus load reductions needed for Moody Lake to meet water quality standards.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mike,Kinney,"Comfort Lake-Forest Lake WD","44 Lake Street South","Forest Lake",MN,55025,651-209-9753,michael.kinney@clflwd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Chisago, Washington",,"Lower St. Croix River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/moody-lake-wetland-rehabilitation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
33412,"Moose Lake",2016,446914,"MS Section 446A.073","Point Source Implementation Grant Program","Reduce wastewater phosphorus discharge to 1 mg/L or less","Reduce wastewater phosphorus discharge to 1 mg/L or less",,446914,"PFA loan",,,,,"Moose Lake, City of","Local/Regional Government","Construct wastewater treatment improvements to meet more stingent discharge requirements",,,2015-09-23,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jeff,Freeman,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority","332 Minnesota Street, Suite W820","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 259-7465",jeff.freeman@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority ",,Carlton,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/moose-lake-0,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2014,1000000,,,,,,,,,,,5,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2015,1000000,,,,,,,,,,,5,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2016,784501,,,,,,,,,,,1.01,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2017,1215690,,,,,,,,,,,2.16,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2018,333620,,,,,,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2019,242494,,,,,,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2020,55500,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2021,83227,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2023,27560,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,,
36597,"MPCA Stormwater BMP Performance Evaluation and Technology Transfer Program",2016,275000,,,,,,,,,,,,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project will evaluate best management performance and effectiveness to support meeting total maximum daily loads; develop standards and incorporate state of the art guidance using minimal impact design standards as the model; and implement a knowledge and technology transfer system across local government, industry, and regulatory sectors. ",,,2016-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,David,Fairbairn,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,(651)757-2659,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-bmp-performance-evaluation-and-technology-transfer-program,,,,
36597,"MPCA Stormwater BMP Performance Evaluation and Technology Transfer Program",2017,275000,,,,,,,,,,,,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project will evaluate best management performance and effectiveness to support meeting total maximum daily loads; develop standards and incorporate state of the art guidance using minimal impact design standards as the model; and implement a knowledge and technology transfer system across local government, industry, and regulatory sectors. ",,,2016-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,David,Fairbairn,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,(651)757-2659,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-bmp-performance-evaluation-and-technology-transfer-program,,,,
28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2014,162243,,,,,,,,,,,1.48,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,,
28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2015,171456,,,,,,,,,,,1.57,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,,
28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2016,154632,,,,,,,,,,,.97,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,,
28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2017,394892,,,,,,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2014,4105849,,,,,,,,,,,38,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2015,4173501,,,,,,,,,,,33,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2016,5309905,,,,,,,,,,,33.81,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2017,6028498,,,,,,,,,,,35.16,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2018,5481766,,,,,,,,,,,35.11,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2019,5866668,,,,,,,,,,,34.44,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2020,5513679,,,,,,,,,,,35.34,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2021,5289006,,,,,,,,,,,32.94,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2022,5231367,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(b)",,,,,,,,,,33.55,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2023,5583937,,,,,,,,,,,34.62,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2024,5503333,,,,,,,,,,,32.69,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2016,5351892,,,,,,,,,,,44.85,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2017,5528098,,,,,,,,,,,40.82,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2018,5477821,,,,,,,,,,,41.76,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2019,5529246,,,,,,,,,,,40.78,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2020,5483925,,,,,,,,,,,40.27,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2021,5284366,,,,,,,,,,,35,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2022,4956185,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(a)",,,,,,,,,,35.02,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2023,5413432,,,,,,,,,,,36.52,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2024,5971189,,,,,,,,,,,35.27,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2016,53114,,,,,,,,,,,0.5,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2017,80816,,,,,,,,,,,.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2018,182975,,,,,,,,,,,1.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2019,386663,,,,,,,,,,,3.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2020,262427,,,,,,,,,,,2.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2021,215721,,,,,,,,,,,2.1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2022,288794,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(d)",,,,,,,,,,.87,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2023,279451,,,,,,,,,,,.84,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2024,372553,,,,,,,,,,,1.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2014,691911,,,,,,,,,,,6.21,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2015,831629,,,,,,,,,,,7.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2016,755618,,,,,,,,,,,5.75,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2017,764768,,,,,,,,,,,5.61,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2018,743626,,,,,,,,,,,5.14,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2019,821313,,,,,,,,,,,5.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2020,772185,,,,,,,,,,,5.22,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2021,874046,,,,,,,,,,,5.61,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2022,887226,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(e)",,,,,,,,,,5.67,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2023,883851,,,,,,,,,,,5.45,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2024,1092756,,,,,,,,,,,6.4,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2016,567922,,,,,,,,,,,3.29,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2017,620426,,,,,,,,,,,3.83,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2018,693557,,,,,,,,,,,4.21,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2019,632044,,,,,,,,,,,3.54,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2020,671209,,,,,,,,,,,4.4,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2021,677851,,,,,,,,,,,3.24,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2022,600617,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(c)",,,,,,,,,,3.51,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2023,591495,,,,,,,,,,,3.42,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2024,628687,,,,,,,,,,,3.53,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2016,853501,,,,,,,,,,,3.21,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2017,1205491,,,,,,,,,,,3.24,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2018,798114,,,,,,,,,,,1.87,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2019,719141,,,,,,,,,,,1.32,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2020,235001,,,,,,,,,,,1.73,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2021,164683,,,,,,,,,,,1.39,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2022,200292,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(f)",,,,,,,,,,1.25,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2023,215932,,,,,,,,,,,1.45,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2024,180681,,,,,,,,,,,.91,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2014,33940,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2015,39346,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2016,47631,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2017,46084,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2018,50000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2019,41424,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2020,53427,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2021,68378,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2022,285633,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(j)",,,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2023,298802,,,,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2024,342506,,,,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,,
33254,"Mustinka River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Pre Public Notice Revision",2016,7329,,,,,,,,,,,0.03,"Emmons & Oliver Resources (EOR)","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project will address United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) comments on the Preliminary Draft Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) comments on the pre-public notice draft Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) report, and produce Public Notice Draft TMDL study and Public Notice Draft WRAPS report ready for public review and comment. ",,"Mustinka River Watershed",2015-10-20,2015-12-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Cary G",Hernandez,"MPCA Detroit Lakes Office","714 Lake Street, Suite 220","Detroit Lakes",MN,56501,"(218) 846-8124",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Big Stone, Grant, Otter Tail, Stevens, Traverse",,"Mustinka River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mustinka-river-watershed-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-and-watershed-restoration-protection,,,,
33823,"U of M Natural Resources Research Institute Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG): St. Croix River (Upper) and Kettle River Lake & Stream Sampling",2016,56002,,,,,,,,,,,0.54,"University of Minnesota: Sponsored Projects Administration","Public College/University","The project goal is to assist the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with meeting the objectives of the Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG) to conduct field and water chemistry monitoring at MPCA specified lake sampling locations and stream locations. This will be accomplished by collecting water samples at seven lake sites and eight streams in the Kettle and Upper St. Croix Watersheds, as well as compiling and submitting the required data, information and reports.",,"Upper St. Croix River Watershed Kettle River Watershed ",2016-03-02,2018-01-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Claudia,Carranza,"University of Minnesota: Sponsored Projects Administration","450 McNamara Center 200 Oak Street Southeast",Minneapolis,MN,55455,"(612) 626-7441",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Aitkin, Carlton, Pine",,"Kettle River, Upper St. Croix River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/u-m-natural-resources-research-institute-surface-water-assessment-grant-swag-st-croix-river,,,,
34217,"Nicollet County/SWCD Watershed Implementation Targeting",2016,84152,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7",,"PTMapp was completed in impaired watersheds in Nicollet County.","Achieved proposed outcomes",2000000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",3000000,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",5.7,"Nicollet County","Local/Regional Government","Nicollet County is located in south central Minnesota and is bordered on two sides by the Minnesota River. A line of forested bluffs separate the river valley from land that is relatively flat and historically used for agricultural purposes. Approximately 245,000 acres of the County are actively farmed. The 2012 impaired waters list for water bodies located in Nicollet County include the Minnesota River, Seven Mile Creek, Rogers Creek and tributaries to the Rush River. This project will develop integrated management tools to accelerate on-the-ground best management projects that can be used to help address these impairments. Specifically, GIS data for the County will be compiled, analyzed, and processed for use in Prioritize, Target, and Measure Application (PTMApp) desktop tools, which will identify sites with high value for best management practice implementation. Local Government Unit (LGU) staff will contact landowners identified from the desktop tools via letters, phone, and in person for site visits to evaluate potential projects that would help address the nutrient and/or sediment impairments consistent with the local Water Management Plan for the County. This project is a partnership between Nicollet County and Nicollet SWCD, with Nicollet County acting as the project administrator. Staff from both offices will provide in kind staff time match throughout the project.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Amy,Linnerooth,"Nicollet County","501 S. Minnesota Avenue","St. Peter",MN,56082,507-934-7072,alinnerooth@co.nicollet.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Nicollet,,"Lower Minnesota River , Minnesota River - Mankato",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nicollet-countyswcd-watershed-implementation-targeting,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2025,1600000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(f)","$1,600,000 the first year and $1,600,000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities and targeted forest stewardship for water quality. ","Watershed planning and site-scale technical assistance: Continue using our hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity data, analyses and expertise to contribute to CWMPs and to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of actual, planned, or proposed on-the-ground water quality/water management projects, including projects identified as priorities in approved Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CWMPs). Work with local partners to write 40 forest stewardship plans covering 2,600 woodland acres, with cost share and technical assistance for around 90 projects on 400 to 750 acres to improve water quality in priority areas identified in Landscape Stewardship Plans and CWMPs for four southeastern MN watersheds. Plant trees in four central MN watersheds where tree planting is an identified priority. Information resources: Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related datasets. Continue helping local 1W1P partnerships and groups like the Northern Waters Land Trust, Minnesota Land Trust, and Natural Shorelines Partnership use this information to prioritize lakes for protection. Continue helping local partners develop and apply higher water quality standards in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Develop and coordinate a lake resiliency and climate change conference for LGUs. Collaborate with the UM Climate Adaptation Partnership to develop training to help agency staff communicate with LGUs about climate change impacts on water quality and the need to act. Continue technical guidance for the interagency fish contamination assessment program and help migrate historical data to MPCA for public access. Watershed science outreach: Continue outreach on the science of watershed health to help implementers and practitioners understand root causes of water quality problems and apply multiple-benefit solutions.   ",,,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2024,1600000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(f)","$1,600,000 the first year and $1,600,000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities and targeted forest stewardship for water quality. "," Watershed planning: Participate in all 15 to 20 One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects in progress to develop or update Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CWMPs) by contributing relevant data and information and reviewing plans. Implementation technical assistance: Continue building on our participation in 1W1P and using our hydrology, stream geomorphology, and connectivity information and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of actual, planned, or proposed on-the-ground water quality or water management projects, including many identified as priorities in approved CWMPs. Our past assistance to local partners in evaluating, designing and implementing culvert/bridge replacements using the geomorphic approach has spawned a new grant program which will fund this work in the FY24-25 biennium. Protecting lakes, shoreland and floodplains: Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related datasets and continue to help watershed partners use the information to prioritize lakes for protection. Continue helping local partners develop and apply higher standards for water quality in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase, adding pages related to climate change and vanishing shorelines. Collaborate with local partners to provide forest stewardship plans, cost share and technical assistance to private forest landowners to help protect or restore water quality in priority lakes identified by local partners in CWMPs in northern Minnesota. Fish contamination: Continue providing technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Watershed science outreach: Continue outreach on the topics above to help stakeholders and practitioners understand root causes of water quality problems and use scientific data and information to apply multiple-benefit solutions. ","Watershed planning: Field staff contributed information and reviewed drafts for at least 20 1W1P plan development or amendment efforts. Site-scale technical assistance: Field staff used their hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity data, analyses and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, or monitor over 120 actual, planned or proposed projects in 45 major watersheds, 49% of which we assisted for the first time this year (the work may span years as projects go from conceptual to built). Nearly 95% involve restoring stream channels or stabilizing banks and almost 60% involve stream crossings. About 65% are beyond the idea stage. Worked with local partners to write forest stewardship plans for two landowners, providing cost-share and technical assistance on 103 acres to protect water quality in priority areas in the Root and Cannon River watersheds.  Information resources: Specialists updated the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index, lake hydrology datasets with lake health scores, and cost-benefit data (now in WHAF for Lakes). Helped 1W1P partners and others use the data to prioritize lakes for protection. Further developed and helped local partners use higher water quality standards in shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Helped launch a Natural Shorelines Partnership. Created a Climate Trends Affecting Shorelands webpage and guidance to help LGUs and citizens protect natural shorelines. Provided fish contamination assessment technical guidance on sampling protocols, mercury in fish tissue trend analysis, and PFAS monitoring and analysis. Crafted alternative methods to assess impairment for mercury in fish tissue. Watershed science outreach: Field staff delivered 14 presentations and conducted two field tours and two trainings, reaching over 615 LGU staff, other environmental professionals, teachers, students and other stakeholders throughout Minnesota.   ",,,,1077276,182058,,8.2,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2023,1250000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","Watershed planning:Serve on advisory committees for around 25 One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects to develop or update Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CWMPs). Continue to contribute relevant data and information and to review draft and final plans. Implementation technical assistance: Continue building on our participation in 1W1P and using our hydrology, stream geomorphology, and connectivity information and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of actual, planned, or proposed on-the-ground water quality or water management projects, including many identified as priorities in approved CWMPs. Continue to evaluate and help partners implement culvert and bridge replacements using the geomorphic approach to connect stream channels to floodplains, improve safety and resilience, and reduce maintenance needs, while also improving stream stability and ecological functions. (Specially designed floodplain culverts distribute channel-overtopping flow in floodplains instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge.) Protecting lakes, shoreland and floodplains: Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related datasets and continue to help watershed partners use this information to prioritize lakes for protection. Continue helping local partners develop and apply higher standards for water quality in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Fish contamination: Continue providing technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Watershed science outreach: Continue outreach on the topics above to help stakeholders and practitioners understand root causes of water quality problems and use scientific data and information to apply multiple-benefit solutions. "," Watershed planning: Served on advisory committees for 25 1W1P plan development efforts, contributing data and information and reviewing draft and final plans. Implementation technical assistance: Used our hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity data, analyses and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement and/or monitor the effectiveness of more than 95 actual, planned or proposed water cleanup/management projects in 37 major watersheds, 35 of which we assisted for the first time this year. (Our assistance often spans a few years as projects progress from conceptual to on-the-ground.) Nearly 55% of the projects we assisted this year involve restoring stream channels and/or stabilizing streambanks and nearly 40% involve stream crossings, including at least 6 using the geomorphic approach for planned culvert/bridge replacements. Protecting lakes, shoreland and floodplains: Updated the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index, lake hydrology dataset and cost-benefit data with new water quality data and helped local partners use these data to prioritize lakes for protection. Helped develop and launch a new interactive lake information tool in DNR’s Watershed Health Assessment Framework. Helped local partners use higher water quality standards in shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase, to which we added pages on riprap and retaining walls. Fish contamination: Provided technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Helped develop fish sampling protocols, mercury in fish tissue trend analysis, and PFAS monitoring and analysis. Watershed science outreach: Reached nearly 1000 local, state and federal government staff at local, regional and statewide events; 125 professionals at a national conference; and many TV viewers and local radio listeners.   ",,,,1013806,180271,,7.9,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2022,1250000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. "," Continue using DNR hydrology, stream geomorphology and connectivity information and expertise (see Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies) and building on our participation in One Watershed One Plan projects (see below) to help local government units (LGUs) and other partners identify, develop, propose, target, design implement and/or monitor the effectiveness of on-the-ground water quality or water management projects – including many identified as priorities in Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CNMPs). Participate in advisory committees for 28 1W1P projects and contribute information to aid CNMP development. Participate in one or more CNMP plan review and update efforts. Continue evaluating sites for specially designed floodplain culverts at road/river crossings and quantifying their environmental benefits. (Floodplain culverts allow runoff to flow naturally during a flood distributing high flows and energy across a stream’s floodplain instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge.) Continue promoting the approach; planning for potential accelerated future implementation to make transportation infrastructure more resilient to climate change; and quantifying the effects on floodplain and channel connectivity at the watershed scale, where projects are being implemented. Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index with new water quality data from MPCA. Continue education and outreach on prioritizing lakes for protection to targeted audiences. Provide technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Continue outreach to help water managers and other stakeholders understand specific aspects of watershed science, including the root causes of water quality problems and multiple-benefit ways to address them. ","Watershed planning: Served on advisory committees for 26 1W1P plan development efforts, contributing relevant data and information and reviewing draft and final plans. Implementation project assistance: Used our hydrology, geomorphology, and connectivity data, analyses, and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of more than 80 actual, planned, or proposed water cleanup or management projects in 33 major watersheds. Our technical assistance often spans several years as projects progress from conceptual to on-the-ground; this year we assisted at least 30 projects for the first time. More than 55 of the projects we assisted this year involve restoring stream channels and/or stabilizing streambanks and more than 20 involve stream crossings, including 9 using the DNR’s geomorphic approach to evaluate culvert/bridge replacements. More than 35 of the projects we assisted this year were identified as priorities in local water plans. Lake, shoreland and floodplain protection: Updated the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and cost-benefit data with new MPCA water quality data. Added Lake Health Scores to an existing lake hydrology dataset. Continued helping local partners use these data to prioritize lakes for protection. Further developed and helped local partners use higher standards for water quality in their shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Fish contamination: Provided technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Watershed science outreach: In presentations on the above topics, reached 75 high school students, at least 160 local watershed management planning partnership or stakeholder groups in several Minnesota watersheds, and more than 475 practitioners from Minnesota and other states. ",,,,901868,148250,,7.5,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2021,1000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. "," Continue using DNR hydrology stream geomorphology and connectivity information and expertise (see Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies) to help local government units (LGUs) and other partners identify develop propose target design and/or implement on-the-ground water quality projects. Participate in all active One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) advisory committees (for an estimated 25 plan development projects) by providing information to aid plan development and reviewing draft plans. Participate in plan mid-term review and update efforts for up to five existing plans. Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index with new water quality data from MPCA; Update the Lakes of Biological Significance dataset. Continue outreach on prioritizing lakes for protection to targeted audiences. Continue outreach on higher water quality standards in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Continue evaluating potential sites for specially designed 'floodplain culverts' at road/river crossings and quantifying their environmental benefits. Floodplain culverts allow runoff to flow naturally during a flood distributing high flows and energy across a stream's floodplain instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge. Continue educational and outreach efforts to help water managers' and other stakeholders' understand specific aspects of watershed science including root causes of water quality problems and the potential to address them in ways that provide multiple benefits. "," Used our hydrology and geomorphology and connectivity data to help local partners identify develop propose target design implement and/or monitor the effectiveness of more than 95 on-the-ground water quality or water management projects in 39 major watersheds. Most relate to stabilizing stream banks and/or restoring stream channels; others involve removing or modifying dams improving lake shorelines or outlets designing ecologically resilient 'floodplain culverts' at problematic road-river crossings and more. Project development planning and implementation can take years. Many of the projects assisted this year were identified by LGUs as priorities in watershed management plans. Participated in advisory committees for 26 1W1P planning projects involving contributing information for plan development and draft plan review and comments. Participated in one plan mid-term review/update. Provided technical guidance and statistical analyses to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Improved data used to help prioritize lakes for protection: Updated lake water quality data in the DNR Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related cost-benefit data. Developed new lake hydrology metrics available at https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-lake-hydrology. Reached over 200 state and local government staff in presentations related to prioritizing lakes for protection. Reached hundreds of Minnesota professionals and stakeholders in presentations on stream restorations projects featured in a multi-state symposium a DNR Roundtable video and a Clean Water Council field tour. Provided culvert design and inventory training to over 100 state and local government staff. Reached at least 125 participants in five 1W1P projects with presentations about DNR Evaluation of Hydrologic Change (EHC) findings. Completed two watershed posters that reached at least 80 1W1P participants and completed or worked on similar fact sheets or posters for four other watersh ",,,,952288,132765,,8.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2020,1000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","Technical assistance with implementation projects: Continue applying our hydrology stream geomorphology and connectivity information and expertise (see Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies) to help local government units (LGUs) identify develop propose target design and/or implement on-the-ground water quality projects.   Conservation planning: Participate in 24 One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) planning projects by contributing information serving on 1W1P advisory committees and reviewing draft plans. Continue training 1W1P consultants in using the Zonation conservation planning tool to help local 1W1P partnerships identify watershed management priorities. Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index with new water quality data from MPCA. Continue outreach on prioritizing lakes for protection to targeted audiences. Update the Lakes of Biological Significance dataset. Continue outreach on higher water quality standards in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances via training and new content on the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase webpage. Continue evaluating potential sites for specially designed “floodplain culverts” at road/river crossings and quantifying their environmental benefits. Floodplain culverts allow runoff to flow naturally during a flood distributing high flows and energy across a stream’s floodplain instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge. This alternative to traditional culverts has great potential to improve watershed health and resiliency. Increase our outreach efforts including a paper accepted at the Transportation Resilience International 2019 Conference in Washington D.C.   Other outreach and education: Continue educational and outreach efforts to help water managers’ and other stakeholders’ understand specific aspects of watershed science including root causes of water quality problems and the potential to address them in ways that provide multiple benefits. ","Used our hydrology geomorphology and connectivity data to help local partners identify develop propose target design and/or implement at least 75 on-the-ground water quality projects in 33 major watersheds. Most involve stream channel restoration or stream bank stabilization. Identified and helped implement design or advance floodplain culverts as a solution at road/river crossings in at least 7 watersheds and presented the approach at a national conference on climate change and transportation infrastructure resilience. Worked with consulting foresters Soil & Water Conservation Districts the Board of Water & Soil Resources and others to complete landscape stewardship plans with forestry recommendations for five major watersheds that supply drinking water to St Cloud and the Twin Cities and have completed or approved local watershed management plans. DNR collaborated with partners in these watersheds to write 223 stewardship plans covering 32 088 acres of private forestland and worked with landowners to protect 21 262 acres of working forestland via the Sustainable Forestry Incentives Act—mostly in subwatersheds considered high-priority for water quality. Participated in 21 One Watershed One Plan advisory committees providing information to aid plan development and reviewing draft plans. Updated the Lakes of Biological Significance dataset lake water quality data in the DNR Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and cost-benefit data that MPCA and LGUs use to prioritize lakes for protection. Reached over 200 state and local government professionals in related presentations. Presented on enhanced water quality protection in local ordinances to about 175 professionals throughout the state. Reached over 250 local decision-makers natural resource managers and others in at least ten other watershed science presentations in nine watersheds. Reached 20 higher education students and others in geomorphic and culvert inventory training events. ",,,,1019070,146921,,8.7,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2019,950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$950000 the first year and $950000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","Technical assistance: In FY19 DNR regional staff will continue helping local governments identify prioritize develop target design and implement clean water restoration and protection projects designed to provide enduring water quality and other environmental and economic benefits. Conservation planning: In FY19 DNR field staff will contribute to 22 local watershed planning (One Watershed One Plan) projects by communicating DNR priorities participating in advisory committee meetings and reviewing plan or chapter drafts. We will help local partners prioritize lakes for investment and set measurable protection and restoration goals using water quality phosphorus sensitivity and benefit-cost data. The DNR Land Use Unit will create a webpage showcasing local examples of high shoreland management standards and continue “floodplain culvert” outreach and technical assistance as well as sediment analysis and advanced modeling of this alternative practice to determine effectiveness at the watershed scale. Forest stewardship: In FY19 the DNR will continue to provide forest stewardship plans to landowners in targeted watersheds. We will also complete three to five landscape-level stewardship plans in association with local watershed management planning (One Watershed One Plan) in headwaters of the Redeye River and Rum River watersheds. The landscape-level plans will help local governments incorporate forestry recommendations into comprehensive watershed management plans. Outreach & education: In FY19 DNR staff will continue educational and outreach efforts to help water managers’ and other stakeholders’ understand specific aspects of watershed science including root causes of water quality problems and the potential to address them in ways that provide multiple benefits. ","Technical assistance with implementation projects: Used our hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity information to help local governments (LGUs) identify, develop, propose, target, design and/or implement over 80 water quality projects in 39 major watersheds. Most involve stream restoration or dam removals. Conservation planning assistance:                                  • Participated in 22 One Watershed One Plan projects. Provided information, served on advisory committees and reviewed draft plans. • Refined the lake phosphorus sensitivity index that MPCA and LGUs use to prioritize lakes for protection. Reached over 300 lake association and LGU professionals at workshops, trainings and presentations on this topic, including cost-benefit analysis. • Created an Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase webpage to highlight examples of enhanced water quality protection in local ordinances and presented it to 120 LGU staff. Worked with LGUs in 8 watersheds to incorporate higher water quality standards in local ordinances or land use plans. • Continued to evaluate potential sites for “floodplain culverts” at road/river crossings and quantify their environmental benefits. These specially designed culverts can improve watershed health and resiliency. Forest stewardship: Worked with landowners, Soil & Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 44 stewardship plans covering 6,842 acres of privately owned forestland in targeted subwatersheds of the Pine and Leech Lake major watersheds. Continued working with partners to develop landscape-level forest stewardship plans for selected watersheds. Other outreach and education: Reached over 1,000 local decision-makers, natural resource managers, youth and others in 32 presentations and trainings about watershed science in 24 watersheds. Organized a River Restoration conference that drew over 200 natural resource professionals. ",,,,848977,106081,,7.9,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2018,950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$950000 the first year and $950000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities.","Technical assistance to local implementation efforts: In FY18 DNR regional staff will continue helping local governments identify prioritize develop target design and implement clean water projects leading to more enduring water quality and other environmental benefits. Conservation planning assistance: DNR regional staff will participate in each of the 14 One watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects that will be active in FY18. This work will include actively participating in 1W1P advisory committee meetings providing DNR priorities to local governments and reviewing drafts of key sections of each plan under way. Where invited DNR staff will also continue using the Zonation conservation planning model to help communities identify water quality and water management priorities as part of 1W1P projects or community engagement in the development of watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS). Forest Stewardship Plans: In FY18 the DNR will continue to provide forest stewardship plans to landowners in targeted watersheds. Work will shift into the Pine River Watershed to leverage a grant from the U.S. Forest Service. Outreach & education: In FY18 DNR staff will continue educational and outreach efforts to enhance water managers’ and stakeholders’ understanding of watershed health the root causes of water quality problems and solutions that provide multiple benefits.","Technical assistance: In FY18 DNR helped local governments in 34 watersheds identify develop target design and/or implement water quality projects designed to provide enduring water quality and other environmental and economic benefits. Conservation planning: In FY18 DNR contributed to all 14 local comprehensive watershed management planning (One Watershed One Plan) projects that were active in FY18 by communicating DNR priorities serving on advisory committees and reviewing draft plans. In five projects we helped communities identify conservation priorities using the Zonation model – in the process helping partners see how to replicate the approach for potential use in other projects. We provided early input on 20 other local water planning efforts and 23 local land use planning efforts involving at least 16 watersheds. Six cities/counties used our updated shoreland model ordinance to adopt or amend shoreland ordinances with higher standards to better protect water quality. We took key steps to help permit applicants learn about environmentally beneficial “floodplain culverts” and continued advanced modeling to evaluate this optional practice. Forest stewardship: In FY18 DNR worked with landowners Soil & Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 14 forest stewardship plans covering 3 604 acres of private forestland in targeted watersheds as well as two landscape-level stewardship plans for Pine and Leech Lake River subwatersheds leveraging federal funds and other state funds to work with private landowners on forest stewardship. Outreach & education: In FY18 DNR delivered over 65 presentations on watershed science topics to more than 1 575 water managers land use planners engineers and others at local venues in at least 20 watersheds as well as larger regional and statewide venues.",,,,829695,104624,,7.4,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2017,1000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","(f) $1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities.","Technical assistance to local implementation efforts: DNR staff will continue helping local government units (LGUs) identify prioritize develop target design and implement clean water projects leading to more enduring water quality and other environmental benefits. Conservation planning assistance: We will join advisory committees for 7 new One watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects and comment on draft and final plans developed by LGUs in 5 1W1P pilot projects. We will continue using the Zonation conservation planning model to help communities identify water quality and water management priorities where invited by the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) or LGUs engaged in 1W1P or watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) efforts. Connecting water quality and land use: In two Upper Mississippi River Basin watersheds we will pilot tools to help LGUs and the MPCA incorporate local land use ordinance information and strategies in WRAPS reports and begin refining these tools for use in other watersheds. We will develop a webpage with ideas for updating local ordinances to include beyond-minimum standards for protecting water quality. We will complete and disseminate a fact sheet for permit applicants about designing culverts that protect floodplains. Forest Stewardship Plans: We will continue working with landowners Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs) and consultant foresters to write up to 30 stewardship plans covering an estimated 30 000 acres of forested land in targeted watersheds. This work may expand into the Pine and Kettle River watersheds. Outreach & education: We will continue educational and outreach efforts to enhance water managers’ and stakeholders’ understanding of aspects of watershed health. This will include presentations at small venues throughout the state as well as large statewide conferences.","Technical assistance to local implementation projects: In FY17 staff assisted local governments with more than 85 water quality projects in 28 watersheds. We helped target 35 projects in 18 major watersheds. This work leads to more lasting water quality results and other environmental outcomes. Conservation planning assistance: We provided early input on 39 local water planning efforts and 11 local land use planning efforts involving 37 watersheds. We participated in all 12 of the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects active that year; we reviewed plans for 4 of the 5 pilot projects provided input on the remaining pilot and communicated priorities to 7 new projects. In 5 watersheds where invited we led communities in identifying priorities using the Zonation conservation planning model. We updated the DNR Shoreland Model Ordinance with options that provide better water quality protection and disseminated this information to planners. Several counties are now exploring ordinance updates using the model. In 2 watersheds staff began testing a shoreland protection analysis tool to help identify opportunities to strengthen existing ordinances. We finalized and disseminated a package of information on “floodplain culverts ” an approach to infrastructure design at road-river crossings that takes stream stability and floodplain connectivity into account. Outreach & education: We gave about 30 presentations to over 800 water managers land use planners engineers and others. Venues ranged from local and regional meetings to large statewide conferences. Forest Stewardship Plans: Wed worked with landowners Soil and Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 43 forest stewardship plans covering 4 287 acres in targeted watersheds with lakes that are home to tullibee an important prey fish that requires cold clean water. We also targeted plans and project work to forested watersheds in parts of southeastern Minnesota.",,,,742515,100753,,6.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2016,1000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","(f) $1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities.","In FY16 DNR staff will continue to work with local governments to identify priority areas for targeting actions to protect and improve water quality including continuation/completion of the five One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) pilot projects. We will continue to use and adapt the Zonation model and associated surveys to create conservation priority maps for the following watersheds: Mississippi River-Headwaters and Cannon Rivers. DNR foresters will work with Soil and Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write stewardship plans for forested land in targeted watersheds including an expansion of tullibee lakes from new counties and more work on the Healthy Forests for Healthy Water project in southeast Minnesota.","Technical assistance to local implementation efforts: DNR staff assisted local governments (LGUs) with water quality projects in 49 watersheds. We helped design over 80 projects; identify prioritize or find funding or partners for potential projects in over 25 watersheds; target effective sites for over 35 projects; and improve water quality protection measures in local ordinances in 8 watersheds. This work leads to more enduring water quality and other environmental outcomes. Conservation planning assistance: We advised 5 One Watershed One Plan pilot projects supplying often substantial technical data on request. We led communities in using the Zonation conservation planning model to identify priorities in 3 watersheds where invited by LGUs or the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Connecting water quality and land use: We started developing several new products: Tools to help LGUs and the MPCA add local land use ordinance information and strategies to watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) reports; an inventory of local ordinances with beyond-minimum standards that protect water quality; a model ordinance that includes some of these higher standards; and a fact sheet for permit applicants about designing culverts that protect floodplains. Forest Stewardship Plans: We worked with landowners Soil and Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 42 forest stewardship plans covering 3 743 acres in targeted watersheds with lakes that are home to tullibee—an important prey fish that needs cold clean water to survive. We also targeted plans to forested watersheds in parts of southeastern MN to improve water quality in streams and rivers. Outreach & education: We reached well over 800 water managers and stakeholders in educational presentations posters and newsletter articles on watershed health topics. Audiences at 35 or so presentations ranged from small groups in over 12 watersheds to large statewide conferences.",,,,674676,99317,,6.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2015,1000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities including water quality protection in forested watersheds. ","In FY15 staff will continue to help local governments identify target and design implementation projects to protect and restore water quality. Staff will also participate in One Watershed One Plan interagency core teams for pilot watershed projects. The 4-step zonation framework will be applied and adapted in additional watersheds including the Mississippi River –Winona Leech Lake River Middle Minnesota River and St. Louis River. We will also apply the framework in the Lake Superior- North watershed at the invitation of the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources as part of the One Watershed One Plan pilot projects in those watersheds. Staff will also continue to enhance local capacity by building understanding of watershed systems through presentations and workshops. DNR foresters will work with Soil and Water Conservation Districts and additional landowners to write stewardship plans for forested land in targeted watersheds.","In FY15 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. We participated in five One Watershed One Plan pilot programs (Red Lake River Root River Lake Superior North North Fork Crow River Yellow Medicine River and Root River. In each watershed one lead staff person (supported by the Clean Water Fund) served as the DNR’s main contact on the locally-led technical advisory team so that our agency’s participation was streamlined efficient and effective. We worked with local governments to help develop 58 project ideas that will provide water quality and other ecosystem benefits. We provided technical assistance with funding design or implementation on 79 specific water quality projects in 30 watersheds. The result is water quality projects that are selected located and designed for long-term sustainability. We also developed new model ordinances with higher standards for water quality and worked on approaches to identify priorities for protection of lakes and rivers. As part of this work with communities we gave 36 different presentations for local communities or groups to build their understanding of watersheds. In total 1175 people attended these presentations and workshops. DNR staff worked with local governments to identify priority areas for targeting actions to protect and improve water quality. We used Zonation a value-based model with surveys and a mapping exercise to produce priority maps for 5 watersheds. DNR foresters worked with landowners soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs) and consultant foresters to write 23 forest stewardship plans covering 3 058 acres in targeted watersheds of lakes that are home to tullibee an important prey fish that requires cold clean water to survive. We are also doing targeted forest stewardship in southeast Minnesota to improve water quality in streams and rivers. ",,,,915714,94779,,6.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2014,1000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities including water quality protection in forested watersheds. ","In FY14 DNR staff will continue to work with state agency partners and assist local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY13. ","In FY14 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection efforts enhancing locally led projects through expertise in hydrology geomorphology and biology. Field staff helped strategically target conservation for 68 project ideas that will yield water quality and other ecosystem benefits and provided technical assistance on funding design or implementation for 84 projects. The result is water quality projects selected sited and designed for long-term sustainability. For example DNR consulted with several local governments about a natural-channel approach to stream channel stabilization which lasts longer and enhances habitat more than traditional armoring of stream banks. Field staff also worked with 44 communities or groups to build understanding of watersheds and enhance capacity to address water quality challenges through presentations and workshops attended by over 1 120 people. Foresters worked with landowners and SWCDs to write 92 forest stewardship plans covering 10 141 acres in targeted watersheds – a dramatic increase in the number of plans in these watersheds which drain to sensitive lakes home to tullibee an important prey fish that requires cold clean water to survive. Forest stewardship plans increase landowners’ eligibility for land protection programs and improve forest health which is integral to protecting high quality lakes. Staff helped local governments identify priority areas for targeting actions to protect and improve water quality using a framework that includes Zonation a value-based model; surveys of hundreds of people to determine how much they value specific conservation features; and a peer-review mapping exercise to synthesize personal knowledge about water quality risks and vulnerabilities in specific locations. Priority area maps were produced for the Chippewa River Mississippi River-St. Cloud and Yellow Medicine River watersheds. ",,,,734146,69391,,6.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2013,1220000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY13 DNR staff will continue to work with state agency partners and assist local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. Field staff will promote strategies that benefit clean water as well as habitat and other ecosystem values through education technical help and partnership. This work will use natural resource information and conservation targeting tools to maximize conservation investments by matching the right strategies in the right places. DNR will be a partner in building local capacity so that local governments are supported in: better understanding watershed systems; incorporating watershed information and analysis into local water and watershed plans; and targeting designing funding and implementing clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR foresters and Soil and Water Conservation Districts will work with landowners in watersheds of sensitive lakes in 7 counties to: write 50 forest stewardship plans totaling 7 000 acres; and distribute $45 000 in cost share funding for private forest management activities. The result will be an increase in land eligible for enrollment in land protection programs and an increase in forest health which is integral to protecting high quality lakes.","In FY13 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. DNR brings expertise in hydrology geomorphology and biology that enhances local projects so that conservation investments give maximum water quality and ecosystem benefits. Field staff worked with local governments to strategically target conservation for 58 project ideas that will provide water quality and other ecosystem benefits and they provided technical assistance with funding design or implementation on 127 specific water quality projects. The result is water quality projects that are selected located and designed for long-term sustainability. For example DNR consulted with a number of local governments to use a natural channel design approach to stream channel stabilization projects; this type of project lasts longer and provides better habitat benefits than traditional armoring of stream banks. Field staff also worked with 32 communities or groups to build their understanding of watersheds and enhance their capacity through presentations and workshops that were attended by a total of over 1 150 people. DNR foresters worked with landowners and County Soil and Water Conservation Districts to write 59 forest stewardship plans covering 6 458 acres of forested land in targeted watersheds. This represents an 80% increase in the number of stewardship plans in the targeted watersheds which drain to sensitive lakes that are home to populations of tulibee an important fish that requires cold clean water to survive. The forest stewardship plans will increase eligibility for enrollment in land protection programs and result in an increase in forest health which is integral to protecting high quality lakes.",,,,570678,69821,,5.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2012,1220000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY 12 DNR will provide assistance to local governments shoreland and woodland owners on clean water restoration and protection issues. DNR will expand the number of people working to promote strategies that benefit clean water as well as habitat and other ecosystem values through education technical help and partnership. This work will use natural resource information and conservation targeting tools to maximize conservation investments by matching the right strategies in the right places. DNR will help local governments design get funding and implement clean water strategies. DNR Foresters will work with property owners in priority areas within the central lakes region to write stewardship plans and promote enrollment in land protection programs.","In FY12 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. DNR brings expertise in hydrology geomorphology and biology that enhances local projects so that conservation investments give maximum water quality and ecosystem benefits. Field staff worked with 18 local governments on strategically targeting conservation work for water quality and other ecosystem benefits and provided technical assistance with funding design or implementation on 48 individual water quality projects. The result is water quality projects that are selected located and designed for long-term sustainability. For example DNR consulted with a number of local governments to use a natural channel design approach to stream channel stabilization projects this type of project lasts longer and provides better habitat benefits than traditional armoring of stream banks. Field staff also worked with 24 communities or groups to build their understanding of watersheds and enhance their capacity through presentations and workshops that were attended by a total of over 850 people.",,,,276675,176489,,9.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2011,250000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","In FY11 DNR hydrologists will continue the workshops and implementation projects started in the south and east parts of the state in FY10. Fisheries staff in southwestern Minnesota will partner with the Blue Earth Soil and Water Conservation District and to promote aquatic habitat conservation practices with local landowners. DNR will also adapt the CD-Rom ""Restore Your Shore"" into a new interactive website to make this useful information accessible to a broader audience.","In FY11 hydrologists and fisheries staff worked with local governments and property owners on clean water restoration and protection issues in the south and east parts of the state: *Presented clean water strategies information at 9 workshops tours and other events including 6 ""Our Water Our Choices"" workshops led by DNR and attended by 93 people including local officials. *Participated in St. Croix MIDS (Minimal Impact Design Standards) pilot steering committee. This project will help cities establish policies and programs that will give them a path to compliance with and a method for calculating credits for certain state stormwater requirements. *Assisted with funding coordination design or installation of 10 restoration projects including 4 river restoration projects 2 raingardens one wetland restoration two native prairies and a high velocity fish barrier. *Adapted the CD-Rom ""Restore Your Shore"" to an internet-based application that allows users to interactively explore ways that shoreline property owners can create enhance or protect healthy shorelines for habitat and clean water. The website includes step by step instructions for shoreland restoration and an online interactive plant selection tool. * Worked with local governments to provide information guidance and technical assistance to landowners regarding conservation assistance easements and conservation projects. This work resulted in permanently protecting 348.8 acres of riparian land and floodplains through conservation easements. ",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2010,250000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","In FY10 DNR will provide assistance to local governments and shoreland owners on clean water restoration and protection issues. This work will be done primarily in two areas of the state. In the south DNR a hydrologist will lead the development and presentation of a workshop series ""Our Water Our Choices"" for citizens and local officials and work with local groups on clean water projects. In the St. Croix Basin a hydrologist will work partners and local communities to promote and implemement best management practices for clean water.","In FY10 DNR hydrologists provided assistance to local governments and shoreland owners on clean water restoration and protection issues: * Presented clean water strategies information at 22 workshops tours and other events including 10 ""Our Water Our Choices"" workshops led by DNR and attended by 257 people including local officials. * Worked with partners to design and install 3 raingardens to capture runoff and prevent downstream pollution. *Provided technical assistance and input to local partners on clean water strategies including agricultural best management practices and municipal stormwater infrastructure. * Worked with Crow Organization of Waters on two river restorations near Forest City and Hutchinson. * Coordinated and executed the High Island Lake drawdown in Sibley County with a collaborative of lake association local and federal partners. * Restored two lakeshore lots on Lake Jennie as part of a hands-on shoreline restoration workshop. * Developed and distributed informational materials about shorelines raingardens and agricultural best management practices.",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,,
34254,"Northwood Lake Improvement Project",2016,400000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will treat stormwater runoff from over 110 acres of currently untreated urban land and will reduce annual total phosophorus loads to the lake by an estimated 22 lbs. ","This project resulted in estimated reductions of 22 lb. of phosphorus per year and 10 acre-feet of stormwater per year",,573515,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",400000,,"Members for Bassett Creek WMC are: Clint Carlson, Ginny Black, Guy Mueller, Jacob Millner, Jim de Lambert, John Elder, Michael Welch, Mike Fruen, Stacy Hoschka, Wayne Sicora",,"Bassett Creek WMC","Local/Regional Government","The Northwood Lake Improvement Project will treat storm water runoff from over 110 acres of currently untreated urban land through a variety of practices at two different locations adjacent to the lake. Northwood Lake is an impoundment of the North Branch of Bassett Creek located in the City of New Hope within the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (BCWMC). Northwood Lake is a shallow lake with a fully developed watershed of 1,341 acres that provides very little stormwater treatment. The lake is used for aesthetic viewing, boating, and fishing, and is home to the City of New Hope's premier park, Northwood Park. Northwood Lake is impaired due to nutrients and is included in the MPCA's impaired waters 303(d) list. The lake is classified as a Priority 1 lake by the BCWMC and City of New Hope. The BCWMC has developed strategies to improve Northwood Lake's water quality dating back to the 1996 Northwood Lake Management Plan and continuing into the 2015 BCWMC Watershed Management Plan. The components of this proposed project were analyzed and fully described in the Feasibility Study for the Northwood Lake Improvement Project (November 2014). The project includes rainwater gardens, underground stormwater collection and re-use, a structural pretreatment device, and a wet ponding basin. These practices will maximize storm water treatment while minimizing the amount of land removed from useable park space. These practices will combine to reduce phosphorus loading by 22 lbs per year, significantly increasing the regularity with which the lake meets applicable BCWMC and State water quality standards. Secondary benefits of the project will include water conservation (through stormwater re-use for irrigation), stormwater volume reduction, habitat improvements, open space preservation, development of innovative technologies, and education. The project will be completed in partnership with the City of New Hope.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Amy,Anderson,"Bassett Creek WMC","16145 Hillcrest Ln","Eden Prairie; Minneapolis",MN,55346,952-832-2822,aanderson@barr.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Hennepin,,"Mississippi River - Twin Cities",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/northwood-lake-improvement-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34237,"Otter Tail River Restoration ",2016,203000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7 ","This project will result in a detailed channel restoration plan to stabilize streambank erosion and encourage natural stream functions in the Lower Otter Tail River. ","Stream survey (profiles and cross sections) have been completed. Three landowner informational meetings have been completed to determine landowner interest in future projects. Project plans were developed for potential oxbow restorations and other Federal ACOE 1130 funds. Grant funds were used to cover 300 hours of staff time associated with three landowner meetings and for SWCD related expenses associated with holding one on one meetings with landowners. ","achieved proposed outcomes",50750,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS ",203000,5,,0.47,"Wilkin SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Otter Tail River is located in west-central Minnesota. Its Lower Otter Tail River (LOTR) reach is impaired for sediment. The LOTR begins at the dam of Orwell Reservoir near Fergus Falls and ends 48 river miles downstream at the confluence with the Bois de Sioux River at Breckenridge. No point sources contribute directly to the LOTR. Consequently, the turbidity impairment must be addressed through non-point measures. Current stream instability and bank erosion is largely a result of an 18-mile channel straightening completed by the Army Corps of Engineers in the 1950s. This channel straightening reduced channel length and induced headcutting which has been a major contributor to channel instability and bank failure resulting in excessive sediment loading since that time. Bank instability is a significant contributing factor to the turbidity impairment in the LOTR. A TMDL study for this reach of the river was completed in 2006 with an implementation plan completed in 2007. An estimated 17 percent reduction in the 40,400 tons/year annual sediment load is necessary to meet the state standard. Since 2007, the Wilkin SWCD installed BMPs to hold the water back in contributing drainage systems and release it slower into the LOTR. The SWCD work has resulted in the retrofit of 40 miles of legal ditch systems with sediment controls (side inlets) and 300 acres of buffer strips. Cover cropping promotion resulted in excess of 20,000 acres of annual cover crops. The remaining implementation strategy will need to address in-stream sediment sources which will require a detailed channel restoration plan to stabilize streambank erosion and encourage natural stream functions. The detailed plan will provide a coordinated framework for future channel restoration. When implemented, the LOTR is expected to once again meet state standards. The Wilkin SWCD and Buffalo-Red River Watershed District are partners to complete this project ",,,2016-01-22,2020-05-27,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Donald,Bajumpaa,"Wilkin SWCD","1150 Hwy 75 N",Breckenridge,MN,56520,218-643-2933,dbajumpaa@co.wilkin.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Wilkin,,"Otter Tail River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/otter-tail-river-restoration,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
34263,"Otter Tail River Streambank Restoration and Protection",2016,135000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Proposed measurable outcomes TBD","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 1870 lbs of phosphorus and 1815 tons of sediment.","Achieved proposed outcomes",,,,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",,"Wilkin SWCD","Local/Regional Government","This restoration and protection project will reduce the loading of sediment to the Otter Tail River by 440 tons/year. This is about 6.5% of the total reduction needed to meet the goals of the Lower Otter Tail TMDL Implementation Plan. The Otter Tail River downstream of Orwell Dam is impaired due to sediment, with stream bank erosion being the primary contributor. This stream bank restoration will include the installation of woody toe debris benches and the installation of a vegetated slope along a 1,400 foot reach of the river. In addition to the stream bank restoration, a permanent 100 foot wide buffer strip will be established to native grasses along the entire project. The project will be completed in partnership between the Wilkin SWCD, the Buffalo Red River Watershed District and the landowner. When completed, this project will make a significant impact of reducing sediment loading to the Otter Tail River and help meet the goals of the TMDL Plan.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Donald,Bajumpaa,"Wilkin SWCD","1150 Hwy 75 N",Breckenridge,MN,56520,218-643-2933,dbajumpaa@co.wilkin.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Wilkin,,"Otter Tail River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/otter-tail-river-streambank-restoration-and-protection,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
33252,"Ottertail River Watershed Hydrologic Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) Modeling - Phase 1",2016,80000,,,,,,,,,,,0.32,"Tetra Tech","For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to construct, calibrate, and validate a Hydrologic Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) watershed model for the Otter Tail watershed. The contractor will produce a HSPF watershed model application(s) that can readily be used to provide information to support conventional parameter Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). The contractor will clearly demonstrate that this model generates predicted output timeseries for hydrology, sediment, nutrients, and dissolved oxygen that are consistent with available sets of observed data. The contractor will deliver all modeling files, memorandums, and a final report documenting model calibration and validation and supporting statistics. ",,"Otter Tail River Watershed",2015-10-13,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Michael M",Vavricka,"MPCA Detroit Lakes Office","714 Lake Street, Suite 220","Detroit Lakes",MN,56501,"(218) 846-8137",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Becker, Clay, Clearwater, Mahnomen, Otter Tail, Wilkin",,"Otter Tail River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/ottertail-river-watershed-hydrologic-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-modeling-phase-1,,,,
34244,"Ottertail River TMDL Water Quality Improvement Projects to Reduce Turbidity Phase V",2016,201000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in a targeted fertilizer application program in the Ann Lake watershed. ","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 1870 lbs of phosphorus and 1375 tons of sediment.","Achieved proposed outcomes",10655,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",34620,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",,"Wilkin SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Otter Tail River is impaired for turbidity. This project involves the installation of 45 side-inlet structures into Wilkin County Ditch 3-2 and 7-1 and 22 acres of buffer strips along the entire systems. Eleven miles of continuous berm will also be constructed along the ditch. When installed these water quality practices will become a permanent part of the ditch system and will be maintained by the ditch authority. These ditches outlet to the Otter Tail River just upstream from Breckenridge, MN. Together these water quality BMPs will reduce sediment loading by 1,375 tons/year. This is about 20% of the total reduction needed to meet the goals of the Lower Otter Tail TMDL Implementation Plan. In addition, this project will reduce Phosphorus loading by 1,870 lbs/year. A TMDL study was conducted on the Otter Tail River by MPCA in 2006. Water quality monitoring was conducted by the USGS, MPCA and the Wilkin SWCD. Water quality data indicated that the Otter Tail River was impaired for turbidity due to sediment loading. The USGS estimated that the annual sediment load at the sampling site in Breckenridge, MN was 40,400 tons/year. MPCA determined that this annual sediment load would need to be reduced by 17 percent (6,868 tons/year) in order for the river to meet acceptable water quality standards. Since 2007 the Wilkin County has been working with landowner to install water quality BMPs into the county ditches that drain into the Otter Tail River. At this time all county ditches, except for CD 3-2 and 7-1 have had water quality BMPs incorporated into them. Work completed to date includes: over 40 miles of county ditches with sediment controls (side inlets) and over 300 acres of buffer strips. Retrofitting CD 3-2 and CD 7-1 will complete this phase of the TMDL Implementation Plan. This work will be done in cooperation with Wilkin County Landowners, Buffalo Red River Watershed District, Wilkin County and the Wilkin Soil and Water Conservation District.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Donald,Bajumpaa,"Wilkin SWCD","1150 Hwy 75 N",Breckenridge,MN,56520,218-643-2933,dbajumpaa@co.wilkin.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Wilkin,,"Otter Tail River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/ottertail-river-tmdl-water-quality-improvement-projects-reduce-turbidity-phase-v,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2025,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2024,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments ","The results for FY24 are currently under review and analysis. The final report will be available in June 2025. ",,,,318465,46459,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2023,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2025. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 820 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,580 Total number of pesticide analytes - 186 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 49 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 70 Total pesticide analyses completed - 122,239 Total number of pesticide detections - 5,897 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (84) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (94) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1), and Chlorpyrifos (10) ",,,,296745,45473,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2022,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2025. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 851 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,623 Total number of pesticide analytes - 185 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 49 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 77 Total pesticide analyses completed - 122,293 Total number of pesticide detections - 6,828 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor (84) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (93) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chlorpyrifos (13) ",,,,298907,44221,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2021,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events  - 714 Number of pesticide samples collected  -  1,379 Total number of pesticide analytes  -  181 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater  -  42 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water  -  73 Total pesticide analyses completed  -  100,465 Total number of pesticide detections  -  4,365 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater  - Metolachlor ESA Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water  -  Hydoxyatrazine Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments  - Acetochlor (1), Chlorpyrifos (13)   ",,,,301456,48553,,2.29,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2020,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 838 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,586 Total number of pesticide analytes - 178 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 45 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 73 Total pesticide analyses completed - 121,384 Total number of pesticide detections - 7,274 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (87) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (95) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chlorpyrifos (13) ",,,,306828,46024,,2.41,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2019,350000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M. L. 2017: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 972 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,909 Total number of pesticide analytes - 166 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 47 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 69 Total pesticide analyses completed - 119,963 Total number of pesticide detections - 7,605 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (82) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (97) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chrlopyrifos (13) ",,,,315168,39428,,2.54,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2018,350000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 957 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,819 Total number of pesticide analytes - 155 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 40 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 66 Total pesticide analyses completed - 103,375 Total number of pesticide detections - 6,188 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (81) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (93) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chlorpyrifos (9) ",,,,336196,47437,,2.25,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2017,350000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Number of target analytes considered per year Number of target analytes detected per year Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and effectiveness of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Fund Performance Report in February 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of the report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures. MDA's water quality monitoring program is reporting on performance measure EDWOM2: Changes over time in key water quality parameters for lakes, streams and wetlands and EDWOM3: Changes over time in pesticides, nitrate and other key water quality parameters in groundwater. ",,,,,290772,43936,,2.25,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2016,350000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and effectiveness of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Fund Performance Report in February 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of the report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures. MDA's water quality monitoring program is reporting on performance measure EDWOM2: Changes over time in key water quality parameters for lakes, streams and wetlands and EDWOM3: Changes over time in pesticides, nitrate and other key water quality parameters in groundwater. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year (143) • Number of target analytes detected per year (108) Groundwater detections: 39 Surfacewater detections: 69  ",,,"The MDA's Pesticide Monitoring Program is supported by the MDA's Pesticide Regulatory Account, Fertilizer Regulatory Account, General Funds and a federal grant. ",330496,52185,,2.25,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2015,350000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ",,"Number of target analytes considered per year (138) • Number of target analytes detected per year (98) Groundwater detections: 36 Surfacewater detections: 62  ",,,"The MDA's Pesticide Monitoring Program is supported by the MDA's Pesticide Regulatory Account, Fertilizer Regulatory Account, General Funds and a federal grant. ",306047,45417,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2014,350000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ",,"• Number of target analytes considered per year (135) • Number of target analytes detected per year (96) Groundwater detections: 37 Surfacewater detections: 59  ",,,,277096,40927,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2013,350000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and effectiveness of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Fund Performance Report in February 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of the report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures. MDA's water quality monitoring program is reporting on performance measure EDWOM2: Changes over time in key water quality parameters for lakes, streams and wetlands and EDWOM3:Changes over time in pesticides, nitrate and other key water quality parameters in groundwater. ","• Number of target analytes considered (129) • Number of target analytes detected (57) ",,,,311480,6075,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2012,350000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Number of target analytes considered per year Number of target analytes detected per year   ","• Number of target analytes considered (126) • Number of target analytes detected (61) ",,,,342294,6075,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2011,350000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (b) $325,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year ","• Number of target analytes considered (114) • Number of target analytes detected (57) ",,,,,6075,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2010,325000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (b) $325,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year ","• Number of target analytes considered (110) • Number of target analytes detected (56) ",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,,
34132,"Pine Soil and Water Conservation District Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG): Kettle River Lake & Stream Sampling",2016,40902,,,,,,,,,,,0.18,"Pine County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","Samples will be taken from lakes and streams from the Kettle River Watershed. The sampling and monitoring of these waters will result in a better understanding of the water quality within the watershed. Having a better understanding of the water quality in the watershed can help when targeting where to put conservation projects on the ground.",,"Kettle River Watershed ",2016-03-02,2018-01-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jacquelynee,Olson,"Pine County Soil and Water Conservation District","1602 Highway 23 North",Sandstone,MN,55072,"(320) 216-4242",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Pine,,"Kettle River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pine-soil-and-water-conservation-district-surface-water-assessment-grant-swag-kettle-river-,,,,
34253,"Pomme de Terre River Association's Incorporation of the PTMApp Model ",2016,115248,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in a GIS-based water quality analysis to assist the Pope SWCD in determining effective locations for best management practice implementation and will prioritize the areas from high to low for phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment delivery. ","The Digital Elevation Model has been completed on the targeted sub-watersheds.","Achieved proposed outcomes",9540,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",38158,726,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.08,"Pomme de Terre River Association JPB","Local/Regional Government","The goal of the Pomme de Terre River Association (PDTRA JPB) is to improve the local water resources within the watershed through targeted voluntary efforts and the building of strong relationships with local landowners, producers, and citizens. To further our efforts in strategically working to achieve our reduction goals, listed in our Major Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies Report and Turbidity Total Maximum Daily Load report, we would like to further define our Priority Management Zones through the development of a hydrological conditioned Digital Elevation Model. Once created, this GIS layer will be integrated into the PTMApp and will aid in the targeting of BMP applicability at the field scale within our sub-watersheds for total suspended solids and phosphorous reduction practices. Modeling will begin on the two sub-watersheds that are contributing the most non-point source pollution according to the PTMApp. Most likely the Drywood Creek and Lower Pomme de Terre sub-watersheds will be modeled, as those areas have already been prioritized through the WRAPS report and have reduction goals for TSS of 72% & 53%, respectively. Through PTMApp modeling, pollution reductions will be estimated not at the practice site, but at the resource of concern and will help estimate the impacts of implementing BMPs on our impaired waters. This information will not only aid in current efforts of project implementation, but will help in the planning of our second WRAPS implementation plan, upcoming in 2017. In addition, we will be able to aid our local partners in generating Water Management Plans and ease the transition from historical plans to a one watershed one plan.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jared,House,"Pomme de Terre River Association JPB","c/o Stevens SWCD",Morris,MN,56267,651-235-7169,jared.house@pdtriver.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Big Stone, Douglas, Grant, Otter Tail, Stevens, Swift",,"Pomme de Terre River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pomme-de-terre-river-associations-incorporation-ptmapp-model,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
33259,"Pope County 8 Lakes Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Comment Response",2016,4953,,,,,,,,,,,.02,"Emmons & Oliver Resources (EOR)","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project will review comments received for the Pope County Eight Lakes Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and prepare responses to comments. ",,"Chippewa River Watershed",2016-01-28,2016-03-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Timothy R",James,"MPCA Detroit Lakes Office","714 Lake Street, Suite 220","Detroit Lakes",MN,56501,"(218) 846-8103",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Pope,,"Chippewa River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pope-county-8-lakes-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-comment-response,,,,
33251,"Presentations for MN Association of Townships - Spring Short Courses",2016,5000,,,,,,,,,,,0.01,"University of Minnesota: Sponsored Projects Administration","Public College/University","This project will develop and present to the MN association of townships on stormwater best management practices and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permits. ",,,2016-01-01,2016-05-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,,,"University of Minnesota: Sponsored Projects Administration","450 McNamara Center 200 Oak Street Southeast",Minneapolis,MN,55455,"(612) 626-7441",,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/presentations-mn-association-townships-spring-short-courses,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2020,750000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$750,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance, outreach, and interventions to reduce risks to private-well owners. "," Assess whether radium is commonly found in private well water at unsafe levels. Assess whether there are additional contaminants that should be evaluated due to their potential presence and hazard in private well water. Determine what, if anything, should happen next based on findings from the arsenic sampling survey and arsenic concentration predictive mapping. Pilot approaches for promoting well testing and financial assistance for mitigation. Equip local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. Promote private well testing. ",,,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2019,400000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (e)","$400,000 the first year and $400,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance and outreach to reduce risks to private-well owners. "," Start assessing whether radium is commonly found in private well water at unsafe levels. Assess whether there are additional contaminants that should be evaluated due to their potential presence and hazard in private well water. Equip local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. Promote private well testing. Pilot approaches for promoting well testing. "," Developed the radium sampling plan and started sampling for gross alpha. Developed and distributed a communications toolkit for water testing laboratories to promote private well testing. Working in partnership with Choose Safe Places Minnesota to train childcare providers on private well testing. Collaborating with Becker County Soil and Water Conservation District to promote private well testing in Becker and Otter Tail counties. Created YouTube videos about private well testing, inspecting, and sealing and how to protect a private well before a flood. ",,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2018,400000,"MN Law 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 8(e)","$400,000 the first year and $400,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance and outreach to reduce risks to private-well owners. "," Finish statistical analysis for data. Present study results at state and national conferences. Publish two journal articles, one is accepted for publication in Groundwater journal in March 2018. "," Results of the statistical analysis are as follows: Filtering can make a significant difference in samples that were elevated then reduced in arsenic concentration a year later. Arsenic concentrations stabilize 3 to 6 months after well construction. Collecting samples at least 6 months after the well is drilled will give a more representative result of the long-term concentration. Collection of samples from plumbing rather than from the drill rig will give a more representative result.  Arsenic concentrations will not necessarily decrease with time, half the time it may increase a year later. Recommendation is for the homeowner to collect one more arsenic sample in the life of the well to verify the arsenic result, once the well has stabilized, at least 6 months afterward. Presented the study's results at the Geological Society of America in Seattle, WA in October 2017 The National Groundwater Association accepted the arsenic variability article and can be viewed online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.12643/full. Will present the study’s results at the Geological Society of America – North-Central Section, 52nd Annual Meeting in Ames, Iowa in April 2018 ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2017,325000,"MN Law 2015 Chapter 2 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","• Finish collecting the final 12-month water samples. • Perform statistical analysis on data. • Continue to track arsenic concentrations in new wells for a year after they are constructed to see if water chemistry stabilizes. • Determine how water sampling methods and the timing of sample collection contribute to arsenic test results in a new well. • Identify the conditions that control arsenic occurrence in groundwater. ","• Collected 109 water samples 12 months after the initial water samples were collected. • Started statistical analysis. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2016,,"MN Law 2015 Chapter 2 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","• Finish all water sample collection. • Perform statistical analysis on data. • Track arsenic concentrations in new wells for a year after construction to see if water chemistry stabilizes. • Study how water sampling methods and the timing of collecting water samples contribute to arsenic test results in a new well. • Study the conditions that control arsenic occurrence in groundwater. • Develop guidance for well contractors and private well owners to reduce risks from arsenic in well water. ","• Collected an additional 129 initial water samples for new wells, for a total of 254 wells. • Collected 252 water samples 3-6 months after the initial water samples were collected. • Collected 136 water samples 12 months after the initial water samples were collected. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2015,325000,"MN Law 2013 Chapter 137 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","• Track arsenic concentrations in new wells for a year after construction to see if water chemistry stabilizes. • Sample 125 newly constructed private water-supply wells by June 2015. • Determine how water sampling methods and the timing of collecting water samples contribute to arsenic test results in a new well. • Identify the conditions that control arsenic occurrence in groundwater. ","Sampled 162 newly constructed private water-supply wells. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
23163,"Private Well Protection",2014,325000,"MN Law 2013 Chapter 137 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurence and magnitude of contaminiants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","Sample 200 - 205 newly constructed private water-supply wells by July 2015. ","Sampled 19 newly constructed private water-supply wells. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2014,1500000,,,,,,,,,,,15,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2015,1500000,,,,,,,,,,,15,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2016,940000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2017,1060000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2018,50000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2019,1950000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2020,300000,,,,,,,,,,,.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2021,1180000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2022,270000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(h)",,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2023,1200000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2024,1000000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,,
10008284,"Rainy River Basin Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling Program",2016,75000,,,,,,,,,,,.52,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Rainy River Basin WPLMN Sampling Program will focus on watershed load monitoring in the Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River-Rainy Lake, and Vermilion River watersheds. Four total staff will work on various portions of this agreement.  The main objective is for one lead sampler and one backup sampler to collect water chemistry and field parameters for eight (8) sites, annually at various flows, especially peak flows, and utilize that data to determine the amount of pollutant load into each stream system. These sites will coincide with locations where stream flow data is also being collected. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Tomevi,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","501 3rd Street, Suite 201","International Falls",MN,56649,"(218) 283-1180",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Koochiching, St. Louis",,"Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rainy-river-basin-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-wplmn-sampling-program,,,,
10008284,"Rainy River Basin Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling Program",2018,51212,,,,,,,,,,,.26,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Rainy River Basin WPLMN Sampling Program will focus on watershed load monitoring in the Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River-Rainy Lake, and Vermilion River watersheds. Four total staff will work on various portions of this agreement.  The main objective is for one lead sampler and one backup sampler to collect water chemistry and field parameters for eight (8) sites, annually at various flows, especially peak flows, and utilize that data to determine the amount of pollutant load into each stream system. These sites will coincide with locations where stream flow data is also being collected. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Tomevi,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","501 3rd Street, Suite 201","International Falls",MN,56649,"(218) 283-1180",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Koochiching, St. Louis",,"Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rainy-river-basin-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-wplmn-sampling-program,,,,
10008284,"Rainy River Basin Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling Program",2019,35756,,,,,,,,,,,.26,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Rainy River Basin WPLMN Sampling Program will focus on watershed load monitoring in the Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River-Rainy Lake, and Vermilion River watersheds. Four total staff will work on various portions of this agreement.  The main objective is for one lead sampler and one backup sampler to collect water chemistry and field parameters for eight (8) sites, annually at various flows, especially peak flows, and utilize that data to determine the amount of pollutant load into each stream system. These sites will coincide with locations where stream flow data is also being collected. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Tomevi,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","501 3rd Street, Suite 201","International Falls",MN,56649,"(218) 283-1180",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Koochiching, St. Louis",,"Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rainy-river-basin-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-wplmn-sampling-program,,,,
10008284,"Rainy River Basin Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling Program",2021,52850,,,,,,,,,,,.27,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Rainy River Basin WPLMN Sampling Program will focus on watershed load monitoring in the Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River-Rainy Lake, and Vermilion River watersheds. Four total staff will work on various portions of this agreement.  The main objective is for one lead sampler and one backup sampler to collect water chemistry and field parameters for eight (8) sites, annually at various flows, especially peak flows, and utilize that data to determine the amount of pollutant load into each stream system. These sites will coincide with locations where stream flow data is also being collected. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Tomevi,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","501 3rd Street, Suite 201","International Falls",MN,56649,"(218) 283-1180",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Koochiching, St. Louis",,"Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rainy-river-basin-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-wplmn-sampling-program,,,,
10008284,"Rainy River Basin Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling Program",2022,68980,,,,,,,,,,,.26,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Rainy River Basin WPLMN Sampling Program will focus on watershed load monitoring in the Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River-Rainy Lake, and Vermilion River watersheds. Four total staff will work on various portions of this agreement.  The main objective is for one lead sampler and one backup sampler to collect water chemistry and field parameters for eight (8) sites, annually at various flows, especially peak flows, and utilize that data to determine the amount of pollutant load into each stream system. These sites will coincide with locations where stream flow data is also being collected. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Tomevi,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","501 3rd Street, Suite 201","International Falls",MN,56649,"(218) 283-1180",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Koochiching, St. Louis",,"Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rainy-river-basin-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-wplmn-sampling-program,,,,
10008284,"Rainy River Basin Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling Program",2025,69826,,,,,,,,,,,.2,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Rainy River Basin WPLMN Sampling Program will focus on watershed load monitoring in the Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River-Rainy Lake, and Vermilion River watersheds. Four total staff will work on various portions of this agreement.  The main objective is for one lead sampler and one backup sampler to collect water chemistry and field parameters for eight (8) sites, annually at various flows, especially peak flows, and utilize that data to determine the amount of pollutant load into each stream system. These sites will coincide with locations where stream flow data is also being collected. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Tomevi,"Koochiching Soil & Water Conservation District","501 3rd Street, Suite 201","International Falls",MN,56649,"(218) 283-1180",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Koochiching, St. Louis",,"Big Fork River, Little Fork River, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rainy-river-basin-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-wplmn-sampling-program,,,,
34303,"Rainy Headwaters/Cloquet - Civic Engagement and Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Support",2016,195000,,,,,,,,,,,2.70,"Lake County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","This project will meet the following goals: develop, implement, and evaluate the impacts civic engagement outcomes for the Rainy River Headwaters and the Cloquet watersheds; create a citizen understanding of the Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) process and the role that citizens, lake associations, institutions of higher education, and other stakeholders can play in attaining water quality restoration and protection; provide opportunities for citizens and stakeholders to assist local partners and state agencies in developing priorities for projects to accomplish restoration and protection, including engaging new partners such as the Vermillion Community College and regional high schools; ensure that all technical and planning documents will be reviewed and commented on by SWCD; and to develop an understanding of and support for citizen and organizational engagement within the Rainy River Headwaters Watershed for participation in the One Watershed, One Plan (1W1P) effort that will be initiated in the watershed in 2019. ",,"Rainy River - Headwaters Watershed Cloquet River Watershed ",2016-06-30,2018-07-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,,,"Lake County Soil and Water Conservation District","616 Third Avenue","Two Harbors",MN,55616,"(218) 834-8378",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Cook, Lake, St. Louis",,"Cloquet River, Rainy River - Headwaters",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rainy-headwaterscloquet-civic-engagement-and-watershed-restoration-protection-strategy-wrap,,,,
33825,"RAMAS Modeling of Wild Rice Populations",2016,3400,,,,,,,,,,,0.02,"Laura Phillips-Mao","For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is the development of a model of wild rice population dynamics, using RAMAS software, which mimics natural variability of population levels and calculates the probability of population extinction. ",,,2016-03-01,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Edward,Swain,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2772",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/ramas-modeling-wild-rice-populations,,,,
10008280,"RCRCA Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network Project",2016,142257,,,,,,,,,,,.78,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area (RCRCA)","Local/Regional Government","The overall goal of this project is to perform water quality monitoring and load calculation duties to accomplish Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) monitoring efforts at the seven sites within the Redwood and Cottonwood River watersheds as well as the Minnesota River site near Morton. To accomplish this goal the requested funds will provide for technician’s time, mileage, lab costs, supplies, as well as equipment calibration and upkeep. Funds will also be used for technical assistance for data management, hydrograph analysis, water quality data evaluation, training, load calculation, and facilitation and administration by adhering to all agreement requirements, weekly project briefings, interim report submission, invoice preparation as well as final progress report generation. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kerry,Netzke,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area","1424 East College Drive, Suite 300",Marshall,MN,56258,"(507) 532-1325",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Brown, Lyon, Redwood",,"Cottonwood River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Redwood River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rcrca-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-project,,,,
10008280,"RCRCA Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network Project",2018,40405,,,,,,,,,,,.39,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area (RCRCA)","Local/Regional Government","The overall goal of this project is to perform water quality monitoring and load calculation duties to accomplish Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) monitoring efforts at the seven sites within the Redwood and Cottonwood River watersheds as well as the Minnesota River site near Morton. To accomplish this goal the requested funds will provide for technician’s time, mileage, lab costs, supplies, as well as equipment calibration and upkeep. Funds will also be used for technical assistance for data management, hydrograph analysis, water quality data evaluation, training, load calculation, and facilitation and administration by adhering to all agreement requirements, weekly project briefings, interim report submission, invoice preparation as well as final progress report generation. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kerry,Netzke,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area","1424 East College Drive, Suite 300",Marshall,MN,56258,"(507) 532-1325",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Brown, Lyon, Redwood",,"Cottonwood River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Redwood River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rcrca-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-project,,,,
10008280,"RCRCA Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network Project",2019,28078,,,,,,,,,,,.39,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area (RCRCA)","Local/Regional Government","The overall goal of this project is to perform water quality monitoring and load calculation duties to accomplish Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) monitoring efforts at the seven sites within the Redwood and Cottonwood River watersheds as well as the Minnesota River site near Morton. To accomplish this goal the requested funds will provide for technician’s time, mileage, lab costs, supplies, as well as equipment calibration and upkeep. Funds will also be used for technical assistance for data management, hydrograph analysis, water quality data evaluation, training, load calculation, and facilitation and administration by adhering to all agreement requirements, weekly project briefings, interim report submission, invoice preparation as well as final progress report generation. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kerry,Netzke,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area","1424 East College Drive, Suite 300",Marshall,MN,56258,"(507) 532-1325",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Brown, Lyon, Redwood",,"Cottonwood River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Redwood River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rcrca-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-project,,,,
10008280,"RCRCA Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network Project",2021,51246,,,,,,,,,,,.34,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area (RCRCA)","Local/Regional Government","The overall goal of this project is to perform water quality monitoring and load calculation duties to accomplish Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) monitoring efforts at the seven sites within the Redwood and Cottonwood River watersheds as well as the Minnesota River site near Morton. To accomplish this goal the requested funds will provide for technician’s time, mileage, lab costs, supplies, as well as equipment calibration and upkeep. Funds will also be used for technical assistance for data management, hydrograph analysis, water quality data evaluation, training, load calculation, and facilitation and administration by adhering to all agreement requirements, weekly project briefings, interim report submission, invoice preparation as well as final progress report generation. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kerry,Netzke,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area","1424 East College Drive, Suite 300",Marshall,MN,56258,"(507) 532-1325",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Brown, Lyon, Redwood",,"Cottonwood River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Redwood River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rcrca-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-project,,,,
10008280,"RCRCA Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network Project",2022,73370,,,,,,,,,,,.32,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area (RCRCA)","Local/Regional Government","The overall goal of this project is to perform water quality monitoring and load calculation duties to accomplish Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) monitoring efforts at the seven sites within the Redwood and Cottonwood River watersheds as well as the Minnesota River site near Morton. To accomplish this goal the requested funds will provide for technician’s time, mileage, lab costs, supplies, as well as equipment calibration and upkeep. Funds will also be used for technical assistance for data management, hydrograph analysis, water quality data evaluation, training, load calculation, and facilitation and administration by adhering to all agreement requirements, weekly project briefings, interim report submission, invoice preparation as well as final progress report generation. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kerry,Netzke,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area","1424 East College Drive, Suite 300",Marshall,MN,56258,"(507) 532-1325",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Brown, Lyon, Redwood",,"Cottonwood River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Redwood River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rcrca-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-project,,,,
10008280,"RCRCA Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network Project",2025,94396,,,,,,,,,,,.23,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area (RCRCA)","Local/Regional Government","The overall goal of this project is to perform water quality monitoring and load calculation duties to accomplish Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) monitoring efforts at the seven sites within the Redwood and Cottonwood River watersheds as well as the Minnesota River site near Morton. To accomplish this goal the requested funds will provide for technician’s time, mileage, lab costs, supplies, as well as equipment calibration and upkeep. Funds will also be used for technical assistance for data management, hydrograph analysis, water quality data evaluation, training, load calculation, and facilitation and administration by adhering to all agreement requirements, weekly project briefings, interim report submission, invoice preparation as well as final progress report generation. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kerry,Netzke,"Redwood-Cottonwood Rivers Control Area","1424 East College Drive, Suite 300",Marshall,MN,56258,"(507) 532-1325",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Brown, Lyon, Redwood",,"Cottonwood River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Redwood River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rcrca-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-project,,,,
10009863,"Red River Basin River Watch FY16",2016,200000,,,,,,,,,,,2,"Red River Watershed Management Board","Local/Regional Government","This project is for Minnesota Legislative Clean Water Fund funding to engage citizens in local watershed monitoring, to work with regional partners to promote understanding and protection of watersheds, and to organize and facilitate gathering of scientific data all for the benefit of water quality in the Red River Basin. ",,,2015-10-15,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Danni,Halverson,"Red River Watershed Management Board ","40048 160th Ave SE",Erskine,MN,56535,"(218) 280-0515",,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Becker, Beltrami, Big Stone, Clay, Clearwater, Grant, Kittson, Mahnomen, Marshall, Norman, Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Roseau, Stevens, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Clearwater River, Mustinka River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Roseau River, Snake River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Wild Rice River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/red-river-basin-river-watch-fy16,,,,
10008289,"Red and Upper Mississippi Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2016,523135,,,,,,,,,,,3.32,"International Water Institute","Local/Regional Government","The International Water Institute (IWI) will monitor 42 sites (3 basin, 12 major watershed, and 27 subwatershed) in the Red River and Upper Mississippi River Basins intensively during the contract period. There will also be 5 sites in the Red River Basin where mercury samples will be collected and sent to Minnesota Department of Health for analysis. The IWI will collect water samples across the range of flow conditions targeting sample collection at times of moderate to high flow. Monitoring will follow the sampling frequency and the parameter list provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. Load calculations for each site will also be completed using the FLUX32 model. Loading information will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Danni,Halvorson,"International Water Institute","1120 28th Avenue North Suite B",Fargo,ND,58102,"(218) 280-0515",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Beltrami, Cass, Grant, Itasca, Kittson, Marshall, Norman, Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River, Clearwater River, Leech Lake River, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Roseau River, Snake River, Thief River, Two Rivers",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/red-and-upper-mississippi-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008289,"Red and Upper Mississippi Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2018,288451,,,,,,,,,,,1.66,"International Water Institute","Local/Regional Government","The International Water Institute (IWI) will monitor 42 sites (3 basin, 12 major watershed, and 27 subwatershed) in the Red River and Upper Mississippi River Basins intensively during the contract period. There will also be 5 sites in the Red River Basin where mercury samples will be collected and sent to Minnesota Department of Health for analysis. The IWI will collect water samples across the range of flow conditions targeting sample collection at times of moderate to high flow. Monitoring will follow the sampling frequency and the parameter list provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. Load calculations for each site will also be completed using the FLUX32 model. Loading information will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Danni,Halvorson,"International Water Institute","1120 28th Avenue North Suite B",Fargo,ND,58102,"(218) 280-0515",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Beltrami, Cass, Grant, Itasca, Kittson, Marshall, Norman, Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River, Clearwater River, Leech Lake River, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Roseau River, Snake River, Thief River, Two Rivers",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/red-and-upper-mississippi-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008289,"Red and Upper Mississippi Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2019,201398,,,,,,,,,,,1.66,"International Water Institute","Local/Regional Government","The International Water Institute (IWI) will monitor 42 sites (3 basin, 12 major watershed, and 27 subwatershed) in the Red River and Upper Mississippi River Basins intensively during the contract period. There will also be 5 sites in the Red River Basin where mercury samples will be collected and sent to Minnesota Department of Health for analysis. The IWI will collect water samples across the range of flow conditions targeting sample collection at times of moderate to high flow. Monitoring will follow the sampling frequency and the parameter list provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. Load calculations for each site will also be completed using the FLUX32 model. Loading information will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Danni,Halvorson,"International Water Institute","1120 28th Avenue North Suite B",Fargo,ND,58102,"(218) 280-0515",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Beltrami, Cass, Grant, Itasca, Kittson, Marshall, Norman, Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River, Clearwater River, Leech Lake River, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Roseau River, Snake River, Thief River, Two Rivers",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/red-and-upper-mississippi-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008289,"Red and Upper Mississippi Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2020,243164,,,,,,,,,,,1.56,"International Water Institute","Local/Regional Government","The International Water Institute (IWI) will monitor 42 sites (3 basin, 12 major watershed, and 27 subwatershed) in the Red River and Upper Mississippi River Basins intensively during the contract period. There will also be 5 sites in the Red River Basin where mercury samples will be collected and sent to Minnesota Department of Health for analysis. The IWI will collect water samples across the range of flow conditions targeting sample collection at times of moderate to high flow. Monitoring will follow the sampling frequency and the parameter list provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. Load calculations for each site will also be completed using the FLUX32 model. Loading information will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Danni,Halvorson,"International Water Institute","1120 28th Avenue North Suite B",Fargo,ND,58102,"(218) 280-0515",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Beltrami, Cass, Grant, Itasca, Kittson, Marshall, Norman, Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River, Clearwater River, Leech Lake River, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Roseau River, Snake River, Thief River, Two Rivers",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/red-and-upper-mississippi-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008289,"Red and Upper Mississippi Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2021,243164,,,,,,,,,,,1.56,"International Water Institute","Local/Regional Government","The International Water Institute (IWI) will monitor 42 sites (3 basin, 12 major watershed, and 27 subwatershed) in the Red River and Upper Mississippi River Basins intensively during the contract period. There will also be 5 sites in the Red River Basin where mercury samples will be collected and sent to Minnesota Department of Health for analysis. The IWI will collect water samples across the range of flow conditions targeting sample collection at times of moderate to high flow. Monitoring will follow the sampling frequency and the parameter list provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. Load calculations for each site will also be completed using the FLUX32 model. Loading information will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Danni,Halvorson,"International Water Institute","1120 28th Avenue North Suite B",Fargo,ND,58102,"(218) 280-0515",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Beltrami, Cass, Grant, Itasca, Kittson, Marshall, Norman, Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River, Clearwater River, Leech Lake River, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Roseau River, Snake River, Thief River, Two Rivers",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/red-and-upper-mississippi-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008289,"Red and Upper Mississippi Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2022,463456,,,,,,,,,,,1.57,"International Water Institute","Local/Regional Government","The International Water Institute (IWI) will monitor 42 sites (3 basin, 12 major watershed, and 27 subwatershed) in the Red River and Upper Mississippi River Basins intensively during the contract period. There will also be 5 sites in the Red River Basin where mercury samples will be collected and sent to Minnesota Department of Health for analysis. The IWI will collect water samples across the range of flow conditions targeting sample collection at times of moderate to high flow. Monitoring will follow the sampling frequency and the parameter list provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. Load calculations for each site will also be completed using the FLUX32 model. Loading information will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Danni,Halvorson,"International Water Institute","1120 28th Avenue North Suite B",Fargo,ND,58102,"(218) 280-0515",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Beltrami, Cass, Grant, Itasca, Kittson, Marshall, Norman, Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River, Clearwater River, Leech Lake River, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Roseau River, Snake River, Thief River, Two Rivers",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/red-and-upper-mississippi-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008289,"Red and Upper Mississippi Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2024,268352,,,,,,,,,,,1.57,"International Water Institute","Local/Regional Government","The International Water Institute (IWI) will monitor 42 sites (3 basin, 12 major watershed, and 27 subwatershed) in the Red River and Upper Mississippi River Basins intensively during the contract period. There will also be 5 sites in the Red River Basin where mercury samples will be collected and sent to Minnesota Department of Health for analysis. The IWI will collect water samples across the range of flow conditions targeting sample collection at times of moderate to high flow. Monitoring will follow the sampling frequency and the parameter list provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. Load calculations for each site will also be completed using the FLUX32 model. Loading information will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Danni,Halvorson,"International Water Institute","1120 28th Avenue North Suite B",Fargo,ND,58102,"(218) 280-0515",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Beltrami, Cass, Grant, Itasca, Kittson, Marshall, Norman, Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Red Lake, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River, Clearwater River, Leech Lake River, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Roseau River, Snake River, Thief River, Two Rivers",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/red-and-upper-mississippi-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
36599,"Red River of the North Stressor Response Modeling",2016,19860,,,,,,,,,,,.08,"Buffalo-Red River Watershed District","Local/Regional Government","The purpose of this project is to improve understanding of primary productivity in the Red River and the diversity and population structure of the algal communities occurring along the river system. This will be accomplished through taxonomic identification of periphyton and phytoplankton assemblages necessary for characterizing responses to nutrient gradients along the Red River of the North.",,"Bois de Sioux River WatershedMustinka River WatershedOtter Tail River WatershedUpper Red River of the North WatershedBuffalo River WatershedRed River of the North - Marsh River WatershedWild Rice River WatershedRed River of the North - Sandhill River WatershedUpper/Lower Red Lake WatershedRed Lake River WatershedThief River WatershedClearwater River WatershedRed River of the North - Grand Marais Creek WatershedSnake River - St. Croix Basin WatershedRed River of the North - Tamarac River WatershedTwo Rivers WatershedRoseau River Watershed",2015-08-10,2015-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Bruce,Albright,"Buffalo-Red River Watershed District","PO Box 341 ",Barnesville,MN,56514,"(218) 354-7710",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Becker, Beltrami, Clay, Clearwater, Douglas, Grant, Kittson, Mahnomen, Marshall, Norman, Otter Tail, Pennington, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Roseau, Stevens, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Clearwater River, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Roseau River, Snake River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Red River of the North, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Wild Rice River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/red-river-north-stressor-response-modeling,,,,
31195,"Red Lakes Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) Modeling",2016,99991,,,,,,,,,,,0.46,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to construct, calibrate, and validate a watershed model using the Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) model for the Upper/Lower Red Lake Watershed. The contractor will produce an HSPF model that can readily be used to provide information to support conventional parameter Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Studies. The model will generate predicted output for hydrology, sediment, nutrients, and dissolved oxygen that is consistent with observed data.",,"Upper/Lower Red Lake Watershed",2015-09-07,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Michael,Vavricka,"MPCA Detroit Lakes Office","714 Lake Street, Suite 220","Detroit Lakes",MN,56501,"(218) 846-8137",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Beltrami, Clearwater, Itasca, Koochiching",,"Upper/Lower Red Lake",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/red-lakes-hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-modeling,,,,
34210,"Ripley Nitrogen Reduction Implementation",2016,36675,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Multipurpose Drainage Management 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Six nitrogen reducing projects will be installed through this grant, reducing an estimated 1,590 pounds of Nitrogen per year from the waters in the Zumbro River Watershed. ","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 443.75 pounds of Nitrate. ","achieved some of the proposed outcomes",8301,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",31779,1307,"Members for Dodge SWCD are: Bill Thompson, David Livingston, Don Heser, Glenn Hahn, Larry Scherger",0.16,"Dodge SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Nitrogen is a serious problem in Minnesota's Mississippi River Basin and the Dodge Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) plans to address this problem through the instillation of six nitrogen reducing agricultural best management practices in the Dodge/Steele Joint County Ditch No. 11 system, also known as the Ripley Ditch system. Agriculture drainage, through the use of agricultural tile drainage systems, has been identified as the number one leading source of nitrogen in the Mississippi River Basin. The Ripley Ditch System is heavily tiled and models have shown it to be a major source of nitrogen in the Zumbro River Watershed. The Nitrate form has been linked to adverse health effects, while nitrogen is widely known as the leading cause of the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico. Through this grant the Dodge SWCD, partnering with Dodge County, plans to treat agriculture tile drainage systems draining to the Ripley Ditch System through the installation of 6 nitrogen reducing projects, reducing an estimated 1,590 lbs./year from the waters in the Zumbro River Watershed. ",,,2016-02-24,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Adam,King,"Dodge SWCD","916 2nd St SE","Dodge Center",MN,559279601,"507-374-6364 x 3",adam.king@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Dodge,,"Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/ripley-nitrogen-reduction-implementation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Annie Felix-Gerth",
33256,"Roadside Swale Infiltration Study",2016,4589,,,,,,,,,,,0.02,"SRF Consulting","For-Profit Business/Entity","This work will determine the feasibility of alternatives to monitor roadside swales. ",,,2016-01-05,2016-04-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,David,Fairbairn,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2659",,"Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/roadside-swale-infiltration-study,,,,
10008283,"Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2016,72239,,,,,,,,,,,.38,"Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) project will continue existing efforts to calculate seasonal pollutant loads for the Root River. The Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) will assist the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with water quality monitoring and pollutant load calculations for five subwatershed sites. Samples will be collected using procedures described in the WPLMN standard operating procedures. Sites include: Main Branch Root River (near Houston, MN), South Fork Root River (near Houston, MN), South Branch Root River (in Lanesboro, MN), North Branch Root River (near Pilot Mound, MN) and Middle Branch Root River (near Fillmore, MN). ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Donna,Rasmussen,"Fillmore SWCD","900 Washington St. NW",Preston,MN,55965,"(507) 765-3878",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Fillmore, Houston",,"Root River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/root-river-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008283,"Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2018,42477,,,,,,,,,,,.38,"Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) project will continue existing efforts to calculate seasonal pollutant loads for the Root River. The Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) will assist the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with water quality monitoring and pollutant load calculations for five subwatershed sites. Samples will be collected using procedures described in the WPLMN standard operating procedures. Sites include: Main Branch Root River (near Houston, MN), South Fork Root River (near Houston, MN), South Branch Root River (in Lanesboro, MN), North Branch Root River (near Pilot Mound, MN) and Middle Branch Root River (near Fillmore, MN). ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Donna,Rasmussen,"Fillmore SWCD","900 Washington St. NW",Preston,MN,55965,"(507) 765-3878",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Fillmore, Houston",,"Root River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/root-river-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008283,"Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2020,25018,,,,,,,,,,,.19,"Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) project will continue existing efforts to calculate seasonal pollutant loads for the Root River. The Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) will assist the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with water quality monitoring and pollutant load calculations for five subwatershed sites. Samples will be collected using procedures described in the WPLMN standard operating procedures. Sites include: Main Branch Root River (near Houston, MN), South Fork Root River (near Houston, MN), South Branch Root River (in Lanesboro, MN), North Branch Root River (near Pilot Mound, MN) and Middle Branch Root River (near Fillmore, MN). ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Donna,Rasmussen,"Fillmore SWCD","900 Washington St. NW",Preston,MN,55965,"(507) 765-3878",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Fillmore, Houston",,"Root River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/root-river-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008283,"Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2021,25018,,,,,,,,,,,.19,"Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) project will continue existing efforts to calculate seasonal pollutant loads for the Root River. The Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) will assist the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with water quality monitoring and pollutant load calculations for five subwatershed sites. Samples will be collected using procedures described in the WPLMN standard operating procedures. Sites include: Main Branch Root River (near Houston, MN), South Fork Root River (near Houston, MN), South Branch Root River (in Lanesboro, MN), North Branch Root River (near Pilot Mound, MN) and Middle Branch Root River (near Fillmore, MN). ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Donna,Rasmussen,"Fillmore SWCD","900 Washington St. NW",Preston,MN,55965,"(507) 765-3878",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Fillmore, Houston",,"Root River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/root-river-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008283,"Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2022,46273,,,,,,,,,,,.19,"Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) project will continue existing efforts to calculate seasonal pollutant loads for the Root River. The Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) will assist the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with water quality monitoring and pollutant load calculations for five subwatershed sites. Samples will be collected using procedures described in the WPLMN standard operating procedures. Sites include: Main Branch Root River (near Houston, MN), South Fork Root River (near Houston, MN), South Branch Root River (in Lanesboro, MN), North Branch Root River (near Pilot Mound, MN) and Middle Branch Root River (near Fillmore, MN). ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Donna,Rasmussen,"Fillmore SWCD","900 Washington St. NW",Preston,MN,55965,"(507) 765-3878",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Fillmore, Houston",,"Root River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/root-river-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
10008283,"Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring",2024,39788,,,,,,,,,,,.20,"Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The Root River Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) project will continue existing efforts to calculate seasonal pollutant loads for the Root River. The Fillmore Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) will assist the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) with water quality monitoring and pollutant load calculations for five subwatershed sites. Samples will be collected using procedures described in the WPLMN standard operating procedures. Sites include: Main Branch Root River (near Houston, MN), South Fork Root River (near Houston, MN), South Branch Root River (in Lanesboro, MN), North Branch Root River (near Pilot Mound, MN) and Middle Branch Root River (near Fillmore, MN). ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Donna,Rasmussen,"Fillmore SWCD","900 Washington St. NW",Preston,MN,55965,"(507) 765-3878",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Fillmore, Houston",,"Root River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/root-river-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring,,,,
34216,"Roseau Lake Water Quality Improvement Report",2016,111800,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","The purpose of this project is to develop a Roseau Lake Water Quality Improvement Report that will result in development of site specific implementation actions through use of the Prioritize, Targeting, and Measuring Application (PTMApp) and the Drained Wetland Basin Inventory terrain analysis methods. ","Work was completed as per the approved work plan and included Houston Engineering developing a report outlining potential activities in the Hay Creek sub-watershed. International Water Institute completed hydro-conditioning of Digital Elevation Model for Roseau Lake watershed.","Achieved Proposed Outcomes",26320,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",105282,3296,"Members for Roseau River WD are: Aaron Magnusson, Carter Diesen, Cody Schmalz, Leroy Carriere, Tony Wensloff",0.22,"Roseau River WD","Local/Regional Government","The goal of this project is to develop a Roseau Lake Water Quality Improvement Report that will include a prioritized, targeted, and measurable implementation plan that will improve water quality in the Roseau Lake watershed. The project will result in development of site specific implementation actions through use of the Prioritize, Targeting, and Measuring Application (PTMApp) and the Drained Wetland Basin Inventory terrain analysis methods. The PTMApp will be used to identify and evaluate the suitability and effectiveness of best management/conservation practices in the watershed including treatment train scenarios, and provide estimates of sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus delivered (and subsequently treated) to the lake. The Drained Wetland Basin Inventory will identify the location of restorable wetlands in the watershed along with their volume, depth, and drainage area, which will be used to prioritize and target restoration efforts for multiple purposes including water quality, habitat, and flood damage reduction. Final project outcomes will be a targeted water quality improvement plan that includes the 100 most effective projects to improve water quality in the watershed based on cost and total load reduction to the lake. This project will directly compliment the efforts of the Roseau River WD and the MN DNR to implement the Roseau Lake Rehabilitation Project which will improve water quality and wildlife habitat, and reduce flood damages. Improved water quality through reduced sediment and nutrient loading from the Roseau Lake watershed is critical to the long-term sustainability of the Roseau Lake rehabilitation. Funding for the Roseau Lake rehabilitation is being actively sought from sources including state capital improvement and Lessard-Sams Outdoor Heritage Council. ",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tracy,Halstensgard,"Roseau River WD","PO Box 26",Roseau,MN,567510026,218-463-0313,rrwd@mncable.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Roseau,,"Lake of the Woods, Rapid River, Roseau River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/roseau-lake-water-quality-improvement-report,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board ","Annie Felix-Gerth ",
34301,"Rum River Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS) - Phase II",2016,75000,,,,,,,,,,,.48,"Anoka Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","This project will focus on Watershed Restoration and Protetion Strategy (WRAPS) and Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) report development for the Rum River Watershed, which includes Mille Lacs Lake (the second largest lake in Minnesota) and the Rum River of which Mille Lacs Lake is the headwaters. The project will produce a plan that partners and citizens will be able to implement, a framework for citizen engagement, and a set of watershed management activities that will achieve water quality standards for all impairments within the watershed.",,"Rum River Watershed ",2016-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jamie,Schurbon,"Anoka Conservation District","1318 McKay Drive NE Suite 300","Ham Lake",MN,55304,"(763) 434-2030",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Aitkin, Anoka, Benton, Chisago, Crow Wing, Isanti, Kanabec, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Sherburne",,"Rum River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/rum-river-watershed-restoration-protection-strategy-wraps-phase-ii,,,,
10008285,"Sauk River Watershed District Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN)",2016,48793,,,,,,,,,,,.24,"Sauk River Watershed District","Local/Regional Government","The project goal is to conduct water chemistry monitoring at one subwatershed site, one basin site, and one major watershed site in 2016 and 2017 based on flow conditions, targeting runoff events using protocols defined in the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Standard Operating Procedures and Guidance. The data collected will be submitted to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and used in the FLUX32 model for calculating pollutant loads. This loading information, in turn, will be used at both the state and local level to guide policy and strategies for the restoration and protection of Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Sarah Jo",Schmitz,"Sauk River Watershed District","524 4th Street South","Sauk Centre",MN,56378,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (174)",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Stearns,,"Mississippi River - Sartell, Sauk River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sauk-river-watershed-district-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-wplmn,,,,
14256,"Sealing Unused Public Drinking Water Wells",2013,250000,"Minnesota Laws 2011, chapter 6, article 2, section 8(c) ","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for cost-share assistance to public and private well owners for up to 50 percent of the cost of sealing unused wells.","To seal 26 unused public water-supply wells in FY 2014. ","Legacy and leveraged funds sealed 26 wells. ",,192132,,,,,0.25,"Multiple public water systems ","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University, State Government","Approximately 70 percent of all Minnesotans rely on groundwater as their primary source of drinking water. Wells used for drinking water must be properly sealed when removed from service to protect both public health and Minnesota’s invaluable groundwater resources. The Minnesota Department of Health protects both public health and groundwater by assuring the proper sealing of unused wells. Clean Water funds are being provided to well owners as a 50% cost-share assistance for sealing unused public water-supply wells. ","Unused wells, sometimes called “abandoned” wells, can pose a serious threat to groundwater quality. Unused wells allow contaminants to travel deep into the ground, bypassing the natural protection usually provided by layers of clay, silt, and other geologic materials. Unused wells can also be a physical hazard for humans and animals. It’s estimated that there are hundreds of thousands of unsealed wells in Minnesota. ","Grantees hire Minnesota licensed well contractors to seal their unseal, unused well(s). MDH staff inspect the wells for proper sealing. ",2013-02-01,2021-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Nancy,"La Plante","Minnesota Department of Health","PO Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-3651,nancyjo.laplante@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Anoka, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Cook, Crow Wing, Dakota, Dodge, Faribault, Fillmore, Hennepin, Lyon, McLeod, Morrison, Mower, Olmsted, Rice, Sherburne, Sibley, St. Louis, Stearns, Steele, Swift, Todd, Waseca, Washington, Watonwan, Winona, Wright",,"Blue Earth River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Lac qui Parle River, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Little Fork River, Long Prairie River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sealing-unused-public-drinking-water-wells,,,,
14256,"Sealing Unused Public Drinking Water Wells",2015,250000,"Minnesota Laws 2013, chapter 137, article 2, section 8(c)","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for cost-share assistance to public and private well owners for up to 50 percent of the cost of sealing unused wells. ","To seal 23 unused public water-supply wells by June 30, 2016. ","Twelve unused public wells sealed. ",,222634,,,,,0.25,"Multiple public water systems ","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University, State Government","Approximately 70 percent of all Minnesotans rely on groundwater as their primary source of drinking water. Wells used for drinking water must be properly sealed when removed from service to protect both public health and Minnesota’s invaluable groundwater resources. The Minnesota Department of Health protects both public health and groundwater by assuring the proper sealing of unused wells. Clean Water funds are being provided to well owners as a 50% cost-share assistance for sealing unused public water-supply wells. ","Unused wells, sometimes called “abandoned” wells, can pose a serious threat to groundwater quality. Unused wells allow contaminants to travel deep into the ground, bypassing the natural protection usually provided by layers of clay, silt, and other geologic materials. Unused wells can also be a physical hazard for humans and animals. It’s estimated that there are hundreds of thousands of unsealed wells in Minnesota. ","Grantees hire Minnesota licensed well contractors to seal their unseal, unused well(s). MDH staff inspect the wells for proper sealing. ",2013-02-01,2021-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Nancy,"La Plante","Minnesota Department of Health","PO Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-3651,nancyjo.laplante@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Anoka, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Cook, Crow Wing, Dakota, Dodge, Faribault, Fillmore, Hennepin, Lyon, McLeod, Morrison, Mower, Olmsted, Rice, Sherburne, Sibley, St. Louis, Stearns, Steele, Swift, Todd, Waseca, Washington, Watonwan, Winona, Wright",,"Blue Earth River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Lac qui Parle River, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Little Fork River, Long Prairie River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sealing-unused-public-drinking-water-wells,,,,
14256,"Sealing Unused Public Drinking Water Wells",2016,113000,"Minnesota Laws 2015, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 8(c)","$113,000 the first year and $112,000 the second year are for cost-share assistance to public and private well owners for up to 50 percent of the cost of sealing unused wells. ","Nine unused public wells are proposed to be sealed by December 30, 2016. ","Nine unused public wells sealed. ",,55486,,,,,0.25,"Multiple public water systems ","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University, State Government","Approximately 70 percent of all Minnesotans rely on groundwater as their primary source of drinking water. Wells used for drinking water must be properly sealed when removed from service to protect both public health and Minnesota’s invaluable groundwater resources. The Minnesota Department of Health protects both public health and groundwater by assuring the proper sealing of unused wells. Clean Water funds are being provided to well owners as a 50% cost-share assistance for sealing unused public water-supply wells. ","Unused wells, sometimes called “abandoned” wells, can pose a serious threat to groundwater quality. Unused wells allow contaminants to travel deep into the ground, bypassing the natural protection usually provided by layers of clay, silt, and other geologic materials. Unused wells can also be a physical hazard for humans and animals. It’s estimated that there are hundreds of thousands of unsealed wells in Minnesota. ","Grantees hire Minnesota licensed well contractors to seal their unseal, unused well(s). MDH staff inspect the wells for proper sealing. ",2013-02-01,2021-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Nancy,"La Plante","Minnesota Department of Health","PO Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-3651,nancyjo.laplante@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Anoka, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Cook, Crow Wing, Dakota, Dodge, Faribault, Fillmore, Hennepin, Lyon, McLeod, Morrison, Mower, Olmsted, Rice, Sherburne, Sibley, St. Louis, Stearns, Steele, Swift, Todd, Waseca, Washington, Watonwan, Winona, Wright",,"Blue Earth River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Lac qui Parle River, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Little Fork River, Long Prairie River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sealing-unused-public-drinking-water-wells,,,,
14256,"Sealing Unused Public Drinking Water Wells",2018,250000,"Minnesota Laws 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 8(c)","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for cost-share assistance to public and private well owners for up to 50 percent of the cost of sealing unused wells. ","Seventeen unused public wells are proposed to be sealed by October 31, 2018. ","As of March 2, 2018, one unused well has been sealed. ",,,,,,,,"Multiple public water systems ","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University, State Government","Approximately 70 percent of all Minnesotans rely on groundwater as their primary source of drinking water. Wells used for drinking water must be properly sealed when removed from service to protect both public health and Minnesota’s invaluable groundwater resources. The Minnesota Department of Health protects both public health and groundwater by assuring the proper sealing of unused wells. Clean Water funds are being provided to well owners as a 50% cost-share assistance for sealing unused public water-supply wells. ","Unused wells, sometimes called “abandoned” wells, can pose a serious threat to groundwater quality. Unused wells allow contaminants to travel deep into the ground, bypassing the natural protection usually provided by layers of clay, silt, and other geologic materials. Unused wells can also be a physical hazard for humans and animals. It’s estimated that there are hundreds of thousands of unsealed wells in Minnesota. ","Grantees hire Minnesota licensed well contractors to seal their unseal, unused well(s). MDH staff inspect the wells for proper sealing. ",2013-02-01,2021-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Nancy,"La Plante","Minnesota Department of Health","PO Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-3651,nancyjo.laplante@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Anoka, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Cook, Crow Wing, Dakota, Dodge, Faribault, Fillmore, Hennepin, Lyon, McLeod, Morrison, Mower, Olmsted, Rice, Sherburne, Sibley, St. Louis, Stearns, Steele, Swift, Todd, Waseca, Washington, Watonwan, Winona, Wright",,"Blue Earth River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Lac qui Parle River, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Little Fork River, Long Prairie River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sealing-unused-public-drinking-water-wells,,,,
34221,"Silver Lake Watershed Treatment Project",2016,199000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in an estimated phosphorus load reduction of 15 lbs/yr.","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 15.5 lbs of phosphorus.","achieved proposed outcomes",156000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",199000,5,,,"Valley Branch WD","Local/Regional Government","This project will reduce phosphorus loading from the watershed tributary to Silver Lake. The project includes a combination of structural water quality improvements in the SLV-10 subwatershed north of the lake, retrofits (including iron enhanced sand filtration) to the Silver Lake bioretention basin, small scale best management practices (BMPs) throughout the watershed, and educational signage in Joy Park. The elements of this project will reduce phosphorus loading to Silver Lake by a combined 15 pounds per year or 40% of the current watershed load. This project will lower phosphorus concentrations and increase the frequency with which Silver Lake meets applicable Valley Branch Watershed District (VBWD) and MPCA water quality standards. Silver Lake is a 76-acre shallow lake bordering the cities of North St. Paul, Maplewood, and Oakdale in the VBWD. The lake receives runoff from an approximately 350-acre watershed of primarily residential land use. The lake is heavily used for recreation, including swimming and fishing. This intensive use is due in part to the presence of two parks adjacent to the lake: North St. Paul's Silver Lake Park along the south shore and Maplewood's Joy Park along the north shore. Other recreational uses include waterskiing, canoeing, and aesthetic viewing. Water quality in Silver Lake over the past 10 years has declined, as witnessed by a statistically significant increase in phosphorus concentrations and decrease in water clarity. The most recent 10-year average of total phosphorus concentration in Silver Lake is worse than the applicable MPCA standard, and the lake may be listed as impaired due to nutrients. Silver Lake was included in the VBWD WRAPS study, which identified strategies to restore lake water quality. Several elements of this project are among those strategies identified in the WRAPS study. In addition to improving water quality, the project will provide secondary benefits to habitat, recreation, and education. ",,,2016-01-22,2020-05-04,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Greg,Williams,"Valley Branch WD",,,,,952-832-2945,sgw@barr.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Ramsey,,"Lower St. Croix River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/silver-lake-watershed-treatment-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick",
34231,"Single Site Multi-Agency Permitting (SSMAP) Program",2016,75000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Targeted Watershed Analysis","As a result of this grant, the County has established a Single Site Multi-Agency Permitting Program.","Achieved proposed outcomes",16428,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",58515,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.26,"Becker County","Local/Regional Government","An effective regulatory program is key to the successful implementation of local land use and water management plans. Yet, county, watershed, and other state, tribal, and local agencies charged with enforcement and permit review often work in silos and infrequently coordinate with each other or share information. This leads to higher enforcement costs, conflicts between agencies, redundancy of inspections, property owner frustration, and reinforces negative stereotypes of regulatory agencies. The SSMAP seeks to break down barriers to communication and improve the regulatory process by creating an on-line, multi-agency permit application and data management program that is linked to property records and which simultaneously sends permit applications and notifications to the appropriate agencies and organizations. The SSMAP will automatically populates permit databases and updates property records. It can be routinely updated to provide links to the local SCWD and other sites that offer cost share, technical assistance, or design recommendations. Applicants will only need to fill out a single application which will be automatically routed to the County, watershed district, and SWCD. While SSMP program will not replace the hands-on service some community member demand, it provides an alternative for the over 30% of the property owners in Becker County do not live in the county or for those property owners who are unable to take time off from work when government offices are open. The SSMAP allows property owners and contractors to apply and receive permits on-line -saving them time and money. Regulatory staff will be able to review applications with fewer interruptions and will be better able to collaborate on permit approval, inspections, and enforcement. Technical assistance agencies will be notified as soon as permits are submitted providing more opportunity to work with property owners in the design of land and shoreline alterations.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Peter,Mead,"Becker County",,,,,218-846-7360,pemead@co.becker.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Becker,,"Buffalo River, Crow Wing River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Otter Tail River, Redeye River, Wild Rice River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/single-site-multi-agency-permitting-ssmap-program,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
10020217,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,1135,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,1220,,N/A,,"City of Brandon","Local/Regional Government","Purchase and install DWP signs around the DWSMA; Purchase water level meter",,,2016-05-25,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Skillings,"City of Brandon","115 Front Street PO Box 137",Brandon,MN,,"320 808 1767",ryancity@gctel.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Douglas,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-611,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2022,3942000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$3,942,000 the first year and $3,942,000 the second year are for protecting sources of drinking water, including planning, implementation, and surveillance activities and grants to local governments and public water systems. ",,"Protect the approximately 400,000 acres of vulnerable land surrounding drinking water wellhead areas statewide by 2034. Conduct ongoing source water protection planning and implementation for the state’s 500 vulnerable community public water systems. Complete first generation source water protection plans for the remaining 420 community public water systems by 2025. Complete revised source water assessments for all 23 surface water systems by 2025. Complete source water intake protection planning by 2027. Complete pilot source water protection planning for 10 non-community public water systems with at-risk populations by 2027. ",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2021,3942000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$3,942,000 the first year and $3,942,000 the second year are for protecting sources of drinking water, including planning, implementation, and surveillance activities and grants to local governments and public water systems ","Protect the approximately 400,000 acres of vulnerable land surrounding drinking water wellhead areas statewide by 2034. Conduct ongoing source water protection planning and implementation for the state’s 500 vulnerable community public water systems. Complete first generation source water protection plans for the remaining 420 community public water systems by 2025. Complete revised source water assessments for all 23 surface water systems by 2025. Complete source water intake protection planning by 2027. Complete pilot source water protection planning for 10 non-community public water systems with at-risk populations by 2027. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2020,2747000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 8","$2,747,000 the first year and $2,747,000 the second year are for protecting drinking water sources. ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2019,2907000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$2,587,000 the first year and $2,907,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources.  ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2018,2587000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$2,587,000 the first year and $2,907,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources.  ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,2346000,241000,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2017,1900000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources. ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,1645400,254600,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2016,1900000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 thesecond year are for protection of drinking water sources.","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020.",,,,,1622220,277780,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2015,1015000,"M.L. 2013, Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec 8 (b)","$1,615,000 the first year and $1,615,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources. Note:This appropriation is split between source water protection plan development and grants to encourage implementation.","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020.","As of the end of FY2014, approximately 253 of approximately 430 vulnerable public water supplies have completed wellhead protection plans. Most public water supplies have completed inner wellhead management zone potential contaminant source inventories, which are being updated.",,,,,145754,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2014,900000,"M.L. 2013, Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec 8 (b)","$1,615,000 the first year and $1,615,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources.",,"As of the end of FY2014, approximately 253 of approximately 430 vulnerable public water supplies have completed wellhead protection plans. Most public water supplies have completed inner wellhead management zone potential contaminant source inventories, which are being updated.",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2013,861297,"M.L. 2011, Chp. 6, Art. 2, Sec.8(b)","$1,415,000 the first year and $1,415,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water resources.",,,,,,678702,182595,,10,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2012,890000,"M.L. 2011, Chp. 6, Art. 2, Sec.8(b)","$1,415,000 the first year and $1,415,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water resources.",,,,,,676237,216134,,9,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2011,895436,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (a)","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,215,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources, including assisting 30 or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 60 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with the development and implementation of community source water protection plans before new community wells are installed, and awarding ten or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 20 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with source water protection implementation grants.",,,,,,,,,6.75,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2010,122579,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (a)","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,215,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources, including assisting 30 or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 60 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with the development and implementation of community source water protection plans before new community wells are installed, and awarding ten or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 20 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with source water protection implementation grants.",,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,,
32972,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"Rich Prairie Sewer and Water District","Local/Regional Government","Seal 4 wells 581065, 603824; Install fence around RPSWD wells",,,2015-11-01,2016-03-02,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Bob,Gruber,"Rich Prairie Sewer and Water District","504 Industrial Park Road",Pierz,MN,56364,"320 468 0268",bob@rpswd.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Morrison,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-196,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32973,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,9988,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of South St. Paul","Local/Regional Government","Develop a spill response plan; Educate property owners about management of potential contaminant sources",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,John,Sachi,"City of South St. Paul","125 3rd Ave N","South St. Paul",MN,55075,"651 554 3210",jsachi@southstpaul.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Dakota,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-197,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32974,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,9170,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Frazee","Local/Regional Government","Televise well #6",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Denise,Anderson,"City of Frazee","222 West Main Ave",Frazee,MN,56544,"218 334 4991",denise.anderson@frazeecity.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Becker,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-198,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32975,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,2280,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,2280,,N/A,,"City of Barnesville","Local/Regional Government","Purchase groundwater model; Support the Water Festival in Moorhead; Update City website with wellhead protection information",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Michael,Rietz,"City of Barnesville","102 Front St. N",Barnesville,MN,56514,"218 354 2292",mrietz@bvillemn.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Clay,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-199,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32976,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,7260,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,7260,,N/A,,"City of Cold Spring","Local/Regional Government","Develop WHP website; Support Water Festival for 4th grade students; Host a nitrate test clinic",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tanya,Schmidt,"City of Cold Spring","27 Red Ave S","Cold Spring",MN,56320,"320 685 3524",tschmidt-coldspring@hotmail.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Stearns,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-200,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32977,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,4900,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,5000,,N/A,,"City of Bovey","Local/Regional Government","Inspect well, televise casing",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Kevin,Odden,"City of Bovey","402 2nd Street PO Box 399",Bovey,MN,55709,"218 245 1633",boveycitypw@hotmail.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Itasca,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-201,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32978,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,8238,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,8238,,N/A,,"City of Little Falls","Local/Regional Government","Sonic drilling and sealing abandoned well #8 (269272)",,,2015-11-01,2016-03-10,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Greg,Kimman,"City of Little Falls","100 NE 7th Ave, PO Box 244","Little Falls",MN,56345,"320 616 5500",gkimman@cityoflittlefalls.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Morrison,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-202,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32979,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,9925,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,9925,,N/A,,"City of Cromwell","Local/Regional Government","Update radio control system between wells and water tower; Educational materials to property owners about well management; Send Carlton County information about DWSMA and wellhead protection",,,2015-11-01,2016-01-05,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,LuAnn,Freiermuth,"City of Cromwell","1272 HWY 73, PO Box 74",Cromwell,MN,55726,"218 644 3570",cityofcromwell@frontiernet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Carlton,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-203,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32980,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Detroit Lakes","Local/Regional Government","Host second annual Lakes Country Water Festival; Update City website by adding WHP educational items; Rent a booth and provide WHP information at the Becker County Fair",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Scott,Gilbertson,"City of Detroit Lakes","125 Roosevelt Ave","Detroit Lakes",MN,56502,"218 846 7102",sgilberson@lakenet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Becker,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-204,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32981,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,1367,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,1367,,N/A,,"City of Northfield","Local/Regional Government","Purchase transducer to be installed on the new municipal well",,,2015-11-01,2016-03-10,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jasper,Kruggel,"City of Northfield","801 Washington Street",Northfield,MN,55057,"507 645 3027",jasper.kruggel@ci.northfield.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Rice,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-205,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor",N/A,No
32982,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,6773,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,6773,,N/A,,"City of Sauk Rapids","Local/Regional Government","Install monitoring sensor in well #5",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Craig,Nelson,"City of Sauk Rapids","360 Summit Ave N","Sauk Rapids",MN,56379,"320 258 5318",cnelson@ci.sauk-rapids.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Benton,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-206,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor",N/A,No
32983,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,7218,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,7235,,N/A,,"City of Lakeville City of Lakeville City of Lakeville","Local/Regional Government","Send information to property owners about storage tanks and class V wells; Update website with information on City's WHP plan and SWP program; Update PCSI",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chris,Petree,"City of Lakeville City of Lakeville City of Lakeville","18400 Ipava Ave",Lakeville,MN,55044,"952 985 2701",cpetree@lakevillemn.gov,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Dakota,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-207,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor",N/A,No
32984,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,7638,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,7638,,N/A,,"City of Woodbury","Local/Regional Government","Review options to upgrade security for well house; Educate property owners about management of potential contaminant sources; Update City website and publish newsletter",,,2015-11-01,2016-03-24,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Klayton,Eckles,"City of Woodbury","8301 Valley Creek Road",Woodbury,MN,55125,"651 714 3593",jwesterman@ci.woodbury.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Washington,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-208,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor",N/A,No
32985,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,2407,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,2407,,N/A,,"City of Rockville","Local/Regional Government","Support Water Festival, educate residents about potential contaminant sources; Distribute educational materials about WHP efforts; Payment to agricultural producers to convert crop land to native grasses",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Nick,Waldbillig,"City of Rockville","229 Broadway Street East, PO Box 93",Rockville,MN,56369,"320 251 5836",nwaldbillig@rockvillecity.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Stearns,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-209,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32986,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,3555,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,3555,,N/A,,"City of Mahtomedi","Local/Regional Government","Identify properties with abandoned unused wells and potential cross connections; Identify unlocated wells within DWSMA; Update PCSI; Prepare WHP evaluation form",,,2015-11-18,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Bruce,Thielen,"City of Mahtomedi","600 Stillwater Rd",Mahtomedi,MN,55115,"651 773 9730",bthielen@ci.mahtomedi.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Washington,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-210,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor",N/A,No
32987,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,7712,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,7712,,N/A,,"Moorhead Public Service","Local/Regional Government","Televise well 6 B (unique well # 437645)",,,2015-11-06,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Kris,Knutson,"Moorhead Public Service","500 Center Ave, PO Box 779",Moorhead,MN,56561,"218 477 8072",kyoung@mpsutility.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Clay,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-211,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor",N/A,No
32988,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,3013,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,3013,,N/A,,"City of Altura","Local/Regional Government","Investigate and prepare site for well sealing; Print and mail WHP brochure to properties within the DWSMA",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Dan,Horvat,"City of Altura","25 North Main Street",Altura,MN,55910,"507 796 5461",danhorvat1@hotmail.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Winona,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-212,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32989,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,4783,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,4783,,N/A,,"City of Granada","Local/Regional Government","Seal 3 wells 331589, 331591, 331590",,,2015-11-10,2016-03-07,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Kathy,Leet,"City of Granada","108 S main Street, PO Box 126",Granada,MN,56039,"507 447 2200",counsilhouse@bevcomm.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Martin,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-213,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32990,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Winton","Local/Regional Government","Install security fence around City wells; Update website with information about wellhead protection",,,2015-11-24,2016-02-24,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Terry,Jackson,"City of Winton","PO Box 163",Winton,MN,55796,"218 365 4467",terrycj45@gmail.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"St. Louis",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-214,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32991,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,4879,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,4879,,N/A,,"City of Glenwood","Local/Regional Government","Update website with wellhead protection information; Develop spill response plan",,,2015-11-06,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,David,Perryman,"City of Glenwood","137 East Minnesota",Glenwood,MN,56334,"320 634 5433",davep4038@gmail.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Pope,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-215,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32992,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,4800,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,4800,,N/A,,"City of St. Anthony Village","Local/Regional Government","Update PCSI",,,2015-11-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jay,Hartman,"City of St. Anthony Village","3301 Silver Lake Road","St. Anthony",MN,55418,"612 782 3314",jay.hartman@ci.saint-anthony.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Hennepin,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-216,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32993,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,4982,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,9137,"Grantee's own financial resources",4982,,N/A,,"Camp Winnebago","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Construct a new well; Seal existing well",,,2015-11-24,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Laurie," Maloney","Camp Winnebago","19708 Camp Winnebago Road",Caledonia,MN,55921,"507 724 2351",campwinnebagodirector@gmail.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Houston,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-106,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Jim Witkowski, Supervisor, Public Health Sanitarian,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32994,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,3092,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,3092,"Grantee's own financial resources",3092,,N/A,,"Boomerang Bar","For-Profit Business/Entity","Install treatment - nitrate reduction system",,,2015-11-24,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Paulette,Warzecha,"Boomerang Bar","21835 Haven Rd","Little Falls",MN,56345,"320 333 4615",,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Morrison,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-107,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Jim Witkowski, Supervisor, Public Health Sanitarian,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32995,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,5850,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,5850,"Grantee's own financial resources",5850,,N/A,,"Watonwan County Eagles Nest Park","Local/Regional Government","Construct new well; Seal existing well 531232",,,2015-11-15,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Roger,Risser,"Watonwan County Eagles Nest Park","34239 780th Ave","St. James",MN,56801,"507 942 2200",roger.risser@co.watonwan.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Watonwan,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-108,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Jim Witkowski, Supervisor, Public Health Sanitarian,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32996,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,5948,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,5948,"Grantee's own financial resources",5948,,N/A,,"Osage Bait and Tackle","For-Profit Business/Entity","Construct new well; Seal 3 unused wells on property 817064, 132601 Construct new well",,,2015-11-24,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,David,Branstrom,"Osage Bait and Tackle","54507 Hwy 34, PO Box 174",Osage,MN,56570,"218 849 5153",dbranstrom@yahoo.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Becker,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-109,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Jim Witkowski, Supervisor, Public Health Sanitarian,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32997,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,9141,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,9141,"Grantee's own financial resources",9141,,N/A,,"Concord Church of Christ","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Construct a new well; Seal existing well 333545",,,2015-11-15,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Merlin,Moreland,"Concord Church of Christ","55080 200th Ave","West Concord",MN,55985,"507 527 2236",dandrews@fsbmn.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Dodge,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-110,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Jim Witkowski, Supervisor, Public Health Sanitarian,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32998,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,6447,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,60747,"Grantee's own financial resources",6447,,N/A,,"Lutsen Resort Sea Villas","For-Profit Business/Entity","Construct new well",,,2015-11-15,2016-03-02,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Paul,Goettl,"Lutsen Resort Sea Villas","6262 W Hwy 61 PO Box 9",Lutsen,MN,55612,,paulg@lutsenresort.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Cook,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-111,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Jim Witkowski, Supervisor, Public Health Sanitarian,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
32999,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,16256,"Grantee's own financial resources",10000,,N/A,,"Laketrails Base Camp","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Construct a new well",,,2016-01-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Sue,Lemm,"Laketrails Base Camp","PO Box 25","Oak Island",MN,56741,"218 223 8281",sue-laketrails@wiktel.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Lake of the Woods",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-112,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Jim Witkowski, Supervisor, Public Health Sanitarian,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
33000,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,3402,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,3402,"Grantee's own financial resources",3402,,N/A,,"Camp Chippewa for Boys","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Construct a new well; Seal two wells",,,2015-12-17,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Mike,Endres,"Camp Chippewa for Boys","7359 Niagara Lane North","Maple Grove",MN,55311,"612 267 2625",mike@campchippewa.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Hennepin,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-113,N/A,"Beth Kluthe, Planning Program Supervisor,Jim Witkowski, Supervisor, Public Health Sanitarian,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
33001,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,2157,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,2111,"Grantee's own financial resources",2111,,N/A,,"Camp Butwin","For-Profit Business/Entity","Seal unused well",,,2015-11-24,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Michael,Waldman,"Camp Butwin","945 Butwin Road",Eagan,MN,55123,"651 255 4771",setho@stpauljcc.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Dakota,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-114,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Jim Witkowski, Supervisor, Public Health Sanitarian,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
33002,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2016,6475,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,6626,"Grantee's own financial resources",6475,,N/A,,"City of Little Falls","Local/Regional Government","Grout annular space of Well #8",,,2015-12-01,2017-03-21,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Greg,Kimman,"City of Little Falls","100 NE 7th Ave NE PO Box 244","Little Falls",MN,56345,"320 616 5500",gkimman@cityoflittlefalls.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Morrison,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-84,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
33003,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,10000,"Grantee's own financial resources",10000,,N/A,,"City of Bellechester","Local/Regional Government","Inspect well # 4",,,2015-11-15,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Dan,Howard,"City of Bellechester","299 Great Western Avenue",Bellechester,MN,55027,"651 764 0378",rossburg@sleepyeyetel.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Goodhue,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-85,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
33004,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2016,6891,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,7000,"Grantee's own financial resources",7000,,N/A,,"City of St. Cloud Public Utilities","Local/Regional Government","Purchase and install an upstream water quality meter",,,2015-12-03,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Patrick,Shea,"City of St. Cloud Public Utilities","400 Second Street S","St. Cloud",MN,56301,"320 255 7225",lisa.vollbrecht@ci.stcloud.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Stearns,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-86,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34309,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,4400,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,4400,"Grantee's own financial resources",4400,,N/A,,"Wildview Lodge Resort","For-Profit Business/Entity","Construct new well; Seal existing well",,,2016-03-07,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Randy,Barcus,"Wildview Lodge Resort","31955 Wildview Road",Bovey,MN,55709,651-343-0349,birchbarc30@msn.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Itasca,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-134,N/A,"Beth Kluthe, Planning Program Supervisor,Jim Witkowski, Supervisor, Public Health Sanitarian,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34310,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"Green Lake Sanitary Sewer and Water District","Local/Regional Government","Install fence around the well",,,,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Coleen,Thompson,"Green Lake Sanitary Sewer and Water District","14403 138th Ave NE",Spicer,MN,56288,"320 796 4523",colleen.thompson@co.kandiyohi.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Kandiyohi,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-256,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34311,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,2000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,2065,,N/A,,"City of Nashwauk","Local/Regional Government","Seal unused well on private property",,,2016-03-25,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Benjamin,DeNucci,"City of Nashwauk","301 Central Ave",Nashwauk,MN,55769,"218 885 1210",nashwaukcityhall@mchsi.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Itasca,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-257,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34312,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,7155,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,7155,,N/A,,"City of Mounds View","Local/Regional Government","Send information packets to PCS property owners; Update City website with information about WHP; Verify location of PCS",,,2016-04-18,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brian,Erickson,"City of Mounds View","2401 County Highway 10","Mounds View",MN,55112,"763 717 4050",brian.erickson@ci.mounds-view.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Ramsey,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-258,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34313,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2016,3950,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,3950,"Grantee's own financial resources",3950,,N/A,,"City of Verndale","Local/Regional Government","Install monitoring well near existing well #2 Unique well No. 815775",,,2015-11-15,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Matt,Uselman,"City of Verndale","101 South Brown St",Verndale,MN,56481,"218 445 4042",verndalemaintenance@yahoo.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Wadena,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-106,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34314,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Fairfax","Local/Regional Government","Install chain link fence around the perimeter of the municipal wells",,,2016-05-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Marcia,Seibert-Volz,"City of Fairfax","18 1st Street SE",Fairfax,MN,55332,"507 426 7255",mseibert-volz@mchsi.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Renville,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-259,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34315,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,8244,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Le Center","Local/Regional Government","Assess City Ordinances; Initiate planning process to adopt municipal land use controls",,,2016-05-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Pat,Kaderlik,"City of Le Center","10 West Tyrone St","Le Center",MN,56057,"507 340 7116",lcwaste@frontier.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Le Sueur",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-260,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34316,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,3375,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,3375,,N/A,,"City of Foley","Local/Regional Government","Update City webpage with WHP information; Review implementation strategies and provide assistance",,,2016-05-06,2016-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mark,Pappenfus,"City of Foley","251 4th Ave North",Foley,MN,56329,"320 968 4082",foleypwks@cloudnet.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Benton,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-261,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34317,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,6903,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,6903,,N/A,,"City of Kensington","Local/Regional Government","Install a variable frequency drive (VFD) on the City's well; Send WHP article to residents; Provide factsheet about wells management to property owners",,,2016-05-04,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jennifer,Kangas,"City of Kensington","PO Box 70",Kensington,MN,56343-0070,"320 965 2500",ktown@runestone.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Douglas,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-262,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34318,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Ruthton","Local/Regional Government","Purchase a generator",,,2016-05-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Rochelle,"Vander Wonde","City of Ruthton","501 Railroad Ave",Ruthton,MN,56170,"507 658 3902",cityofruthton@woodstocktel.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Pipestone,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-263,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34319,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,9418,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,9418,"Grantee's own financial resources",9418,,N/A,,"St. Anne's Episcopal Church","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Construct a new well; Seal existing well 818568",,,2016-05-13,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Stephen,Dupont,"St. Anne's Episcopal Church","2035 Charlton Road","Sunfish Lake",MN,55118-4704,"651 341 6514",w.ogorek@outlook.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Dakota,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-135,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34320,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,3253,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,3253,"Grantee's own financial resources",3253,,N/A,,"Bimbo's Octagon","For-Profit Business/Entity","Construct a new well; Seal existing well 491104",,,2016-05-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mark,Pernat,"Bimbo's Octagon","7626 Highway 5","Side Lake",MN,55781,"218 969 4491",mark.pernat@gmail.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"St. Louis",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-136,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34321,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,4768,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,4768,,N/A,,"City of Hugo","Local/Regional Government","Update City website with articles about well management, WHP plan, stormwater, turf management, disposal of hazardous waste; Send mailing about BMP practices to property owners in vulnerable areas of DWSMA",,,2016-05-10,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Scott,Anderson,"City of Hugo","14669 Fitzgerald Ave N",Hugo,MN,55038,"651 776 6326",sanderson@ci.hugo.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Washington,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-264,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34322,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,8167,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,8650,,N/A,,"City of Chisago","Local/Regional Government","Furnish and install submersible level transducer in well #5; hardware and software programs to monitor and alarm sensors and configure system",,,2016-05-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Courtney,Wiekert,"City of Chisago","10625 Railroad Ave., PO Box 611","Chisago City",MN,55013,"651 257 7636",cwiekert@ci.chisago.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Chisago,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-265,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34323,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,3235,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,5000,,N/A,,"City of Pipestone","Local/Regional Government","Explore options to remove ISTS in High vulnerability area; Educate owners of PCS-s about WHP and BMP; Provide educational brochures of BMPs to owners of PCS in the DWSMA",,,2016-05-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joel,Adelman,"City of Pipestone","119 2nd Ave SW",Pipestone,MN,56164-1683,"507 825 2506",adelman@cityofpipestone.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Pipestone,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-266,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34324,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,6444,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,6444,,N/A,,"City of Excelsior","Local/Regional Government","Update website with information about well management, turf management and WHP plan; Educate property owners about pollution prevention and BMP; Educate owners of storage tanks about spill prevention",,,2016-06-02,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Dave,Wisdorf,"City of Excelsior","339 Third Street",Excelsior,MN,55331,"952 474 3464",dwisdorf@ci.excelsior.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Hennepin,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-267,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34325,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,415000,"Grantee's own financial resources",10000,,N/A,,"Sportsman's Park and City of Sleepy Eye","Local/Regional Government","Build new water line and connect to City water supply",,,2016-05-10,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mark,Kober,"Sportsman's Park and City of Sleepy Eye","200 Main Street East","Sleepy Eye",MN,56085,"507 794 3731",markk@sleepyeyetel.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Brown,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-137,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34326,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,1967,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,1967,,N/A,,"City of Henning","Local/Regional Government","Purchase enviroscope and educate children about WHP; Purchase groundwater model and utilize at water plant tours; Mail educational materials to land owners in the DWSMA",,,2016-05-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ben,Oselen,"City of Henning","612 Front Street",Henning,MN,56551,"218 583 2402",hennwater@arvig.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Otter Tail",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-268,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34327,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,10000,"Grantee's own financial resources",10000,,N/A,,"Balkan Community Center","Local/Regional Government","Construct a new well",,,2016-05-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Brad,Strgar,"Balkan Community Center","6061 Hwy 73",Chisholm,MN,55719,"218 969 7012",bstrgar@hotmail.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"St. Louis",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-138,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34328,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,543,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,543,,N/A,,"City of Browns Valley","Local/Regional Government","Seal wells on private property; Educate businesses about proper tank management; Provide DWSMA map to MPCA tank units; Above ground storage tanks - updated rules and regulations; educate businesses; Provide DWSMA map to road authorities; WHP education and",,,2016-06-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Thomas,Schmitz,"City of Browns Valley","19 3rd Street So.","Browns Valley",MN,56219,"320 695 2110",tom.schmitz@prtel.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Traverse,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-269,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34329,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,8087,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,9000,,N/A,,"City of Shorewood","Local/Regional Government","Identify unlocated wells within the DWSMA; Update the PCSI",,,2016-06-21,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Larry,Brown,"City of Shorewood","7555 County Club Road",Shorewood,MN,55331,"952 960 7913",lbrown@shorewoodpw.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Hennepin,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-270,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34330,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,2681,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,3395,,N/A,,"City of Andover","Local/Regional Government","Potential contaminant source location verification",,,2016-06-08,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,David,Berkowitz,"City of Andover","1685 Crosstown Blvd NW",Andover,MN,55304,"763 767 5133",d.berkowitz@andovermn.gov,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Anoka,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-271,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34331,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,6946,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,6946,,N/A,,"City of Little Falls","Local/Regional Government","Seal annular space around well #4",,,2016-06-03,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Dwayne,Heinen,"City of Little Falls","100 7th Ave NE","Little Falls",MN,56345,"320 616 5530",dheinen@cityoflittlefalls.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Morrison,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-272,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34332,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,7530,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Park Rapids","Local/Regional Government","Seal old municipal wells #1 and #2",,,2016-06-15,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Scott,Burlingame,"City of Park Rapids","212 West Second Street","Park Rapids",MN,56470,"218 237 2746",rmathisrud@arvig.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Hubbard,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-273,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34333,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"St. John's Lutheran School","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Construct a new well",,,2016-06-03,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jesse,Luhman,"St. John's Lutheran School","36620 County 4 Blvd",Goodhue,MN,55027,"651 764 2297",jesse.luhman@ci.redwing.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Goodhue,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-274,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34334,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,2152,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,4551,"Grantee's own financial resources",2275,,N/A,,"Lutsen Resort Sea Villas","For-Profit Business/Entity","Sealing Well 579295",,,2016-05-16,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Paul,Goetti,"Lutsen Resort Sea Villas","6262 W Hwy 61",Lutsen,MN,55612,218-663-6662,"paulg@lutsenresort.com paulg@lutsenresort.com",Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Cook,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-139,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34335,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,664,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,664,"Grantee's own financial resources",664,,N/A,,"Country Prime Time","For-Profit Business/Entity","Relocate pressure tank to safe environment",,,2016-05-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,James,Corniea,"Country Prime Time","20565 Landford Way",Jordan,MN,55352,952-492-3452,D.Kremmin@CZNLsports.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Scott,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-140,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34336,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,600,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,600,"Grantee's own financial resources",600,,N/A,,"Sugarloaf Cove","For-Profit Business/Entity","Seal a well",,,2016-05-09,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Molly,Thompson,"Sugarloaf Cove","9096 Hwy 61",Schroeder,MN,55613,"218 525 0001",molly@sugarloafnorthshore.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Cook,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-141,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34337,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,2998,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,3092,"Grantee's own financial resources",2998,,N/A,,"Tiny's Tavern","For-Profit Business/Entity","Replace water softening system and add nitrate reduction system.",,,2016-05-01,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jackie,Zehowski,"Tiny's Tavern","19248 285th Avenue",Lastrup,MN,56344,320-241-9676,lorimerritt1971@gmail.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Morrison,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-142,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34338,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,1350,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,1350,"Grantee's own financial resources",1350,,N/A,,"Zoar Lutheran Church","Non-Profit Business/Entity","Seal well 276233; Replace leaking filtration system",,,2016-05-17,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Judith,Gregg,"Zoar Lutheran Church","7239 West Highway 61",Tofte,MN,55615,"218 663 7925",zoarlc@boreal.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Cook,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-143,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34339,"Source Water Protection Transient Grant",2016,9688,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,10000,"Grantee's own financial resources",9688,,N/A,,"Woods Lake Park Water","For-Profit Business/Entity","Construct new well; Amendment 1 to Seal 2 wells 810205, 259597 and add money.",,,2016-05-11,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mark,Daly,"Woods Lake Park Water","PO Box 325","Blue Earth",MN,56013,507-526-4288,mark.daly@co.faribault.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Faribault,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-transient-grant-103,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34340,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,198750,"Grantee's own financial resources",10000,,N/A,,"City of Rushmore","Local/Regional Government","Construction of stormwater detention basin",,,2016-06-21,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Coleen,Gruis,"City of Rushmore","136 N. Thompson Avenue",Rushmore,MN,56168,507-478-4338,rushmore@iw.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Nobles,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-107,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34341,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2016,3812,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,21400,"Grantee's own financial resources",10000,,N/A,,"Rock County Rural Water District","Local/Regional Government","Develop a cost share program to encourage farmers within the DWSMA to implement Nitrogen BMP's",,,2016-06-06,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Brent,Hoffmann,"Rock County Rural Water District","541 150th Avenue",Luverne,MN,56156,507-283-8886,brent.hoffmann@co.rock.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Rock,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-108,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
34342,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,14579,"Grantee's own financial resources",10000,,N/A,,"St. John's Lutheran School","K-12 Education","Install well pumping equipment and new water lines",,,2016-06-02,2016-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jesse,Luhman,"St. John's Lutheran School","36620 County 4 Blvd",Goodhue,MN,55027,651-764-2297,jesse.luhman@ci.red-wing.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Goodhue,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-109,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37373,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2017,10000,"Chapter 91 - HF No 707; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2017","$2,587,000 the first year and $2,907,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Georgetown","Local/Regional Government","Purchase a generator; Provide letters to residents in the DWSMA.",,,2016-09-30,2018-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Don,Culp,"City of Georgetown","PO Box 176",Georgetown,MN,56546,"218 790 6419",donandcindyculp@yahoo.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Clay,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-284,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37373,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Georgetown","Local/Regional Government","Purchase a generator; Provide letters to residents in the DWSMA.",,,2016-09-30,2018-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Don,Culp,"City of Georgetown","PO Box 176",Georgetown,MN,56546,"218 790 6419",donandcindyculp@yahoo.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Clay,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-284,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37391,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,9976,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,9976,,N/A,,"City of Calumet","Local/Regional Government","Remove storage tank; Install permanent WHP display at City Hall",,,2016-03-15,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,April,Serich,"City of Calumet","PO Box 375",Calumet,MN,55716,"218 247 7542",citycalumet@mchsi.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Itasca,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-301,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37392,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,8000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,8000,,N/A,,"City of Hammond","Local/Regional Government","Assess security needs and install fence around well and pump house area; Provide brochure about WHP; Mail City DWSMA map",,,2016-05-17,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Bonnie,Gary,"City of Hammond","320 Center Street East",Hammond,MN,55991-1901,"507 753 2086",completer@aol.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Wabasha,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-302,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37393,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,6175,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Elk River","Local/Regional Government","Seal a flowing well located in the City DWSMA",,,2016-05-17,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Eric,Volk,"City of Elk River","13069 Orono Parkway, PO Box 430","Elk River",MN,55330,"763 635 1361","763 441 2276",Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Sherburne,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-303,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37394,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,5357,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,7500,,N/A,,"City of Long Lake","Local/Regional Government","Develop a water contingency plan",,,2016-05-24,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Marv,Wurzer,"City of Long Lake","450 Virginia Ave","Long Lake",MN,55356,"952 476 2855",mwurzer@longlake.mn.gov,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Hennepin,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-304,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37395,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of North St. Paul","Local/Regional Government","Abandon the city owned septic system and connect to sewer system",,,2016-05-19,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Nick,Fleischhacker,"City of North St. Paul","2400 Margaret Street North","North St. Paul",MN,55109,"651 747 2409",nick.fleischhacker@northstpaul.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Ramsey,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-305,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37396,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Bagley","Local/Regional Government","Construct chain link security fence around City wells",,,2016-05-16,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Colleen,Lindgren,"City of Bagley","18 Main Ave South, PO Box 178",Bagley,MN,56621,"218 694 2865",clindgren@bagleymn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Clearwater,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-306,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37397,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,1208,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,1208,,N/A,,"City of Edina","Local/Regional Government","Mail well sealing educational materials to private owners; Mail educational materials to storage tank and hazardous waste generators owners",,,2016-05-23,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jessica,"Wanderwerff Wilson","City of Edina","7450 Metro Blvd",Edina,MN,55439,"952 826 0445",jwilson@edinamn.gov,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Hennepin,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-307,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37398,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,4417,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,4417,,N/A,,"City of Holdingford","Local/Regional Government","Investigate options to redirect and treat stormwater flow; Educate public about storage tanks, spills and leaks; Training on spill response for City maintenance staff, Fire Department and Sheriff's office",,,2016-05-31,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Sandra,Meer,"City of Holdingford","PO Box 69",Holdingford,MN,56340,"320 746 2966",sandra.clerk@holdingfordmn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Stearns,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-308,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37399,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2016,7019,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,10000,"Grantee's own financial resources",,,N/A,,"City of Clear Lake","Local/Regional Government","2 test wells",,,2016-05-31,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Kari,Mechtel,"City of Clear Lake","7684 1st Avenue W PO Box 298","Clear Lake",MN,55319,320-743-3111,cityofclearlake@frontiernet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Sherburne,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-123,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37400,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,10320,"Grantee's own financial resources",10000,,N/A,,"City of Little Falls","Local/Regional Government","Develop a groundwater flow model",,,2016-06-09,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Dwayne,Heinen,"City of Little Falls","100 7th Avenue NE","Little Falls",MN,56345,320-616-5530,dheinen@cityoflittlefalls.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Morrison,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-124,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37401,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2016,3725,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,3725,"Grantee's own financial resources",7576,,N/A,,"City of Eagan","Local/Regional Government","Dump cleanup near wells 8 & 9",,,2016-06-10,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jon,Eaton,"City of Eagan","3419 Coachman Point",Eagan,MN,55121,651-675-5215,Jeaton@cityofeagan.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Dakota,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-125,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
37402,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2016,10000,"Chapter 2 - S.F. No 1; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2015","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"Green Lake Sanitary Sewer and Water District","Local/Regional Government","Install fence around well #1",,,2016-03-15,2017-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Robert,Sogge,"Green Lake Sanitary Sewer and Water District","14403 138th Ave NE",Spicer,MN,56288,320-796-4523,Corey.Smith@co.kandiyohi.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Kandiyohi,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-309,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No
33255,"South Fork Crow Watershed Restoration & Protection Strategy (WRAPS)",2016,24940,,,,,,,,,,,0.11,"Wenck Associates, Inc.","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project will develop Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) allocations and complete a final draft TMDL report for the five lake impairments listed for the South Fork Crow River Watershed. ",,"South Fork Crow River Watershed",2015-11-03,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Margaret R",Leach,"MPCA Brainerd Office","7678 College Road, Suite 105",Baxter,MN,56425,"(218) 316-3895",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Carver, Hennepin, Kandiyohi, McLeod, Meeker, Renville, Sibley, Wright",,"South Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/south-fork-crow-watershed-restoration-protection-strategy-wraps,,,,
34260,"Southeast MN Wastewater Initiative",2016,286487,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Proposed measurable outcomes TBD","Continued technical assistance was provided to small communities as proposed, resulting in the elimination of up to 156,600 gallons of untreated sewage per day.","Achieved proposed outcomes",,,,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",,"SE Minnesota Water Resources Board","Local/Regional Government","The lack of sewage treatment in many small communities in Southeast Minnesota is causing surface water and groundwater pollution. Fourteen of these small communities will receive technical assistance provided by this project. These communities have community or individual straight pipes which are discharging raw sewage directly to the environment, surfacing sewage, or have sewage contaminating groundwater. Working closely with county staff, local elected officials and the MPCA, two staff will provide a wide range of technical assistance to help these small communities follow the many steps needed to upgrade their sewage treatment systems. These steps include forming community task forces, studying the large number of sewage treatment system options, applying for and pursuing funding, forming sewer districts, preparing ordinances, and developing operation and management plans. The Southeast Minnesota Wastewater Initiative approach, combining education, facilitation, and technical assistance has been used successfully for twelve years in Southeast Minnesota and has helped twenty-two communities upgrade their sewage treatment systems, eliminating 317,290 gallons of untreated sewage per day from entering the Lower Mississippi River and Cedar River Basins (115 million gallons per year!). With the assistance provided by this project, a goal of five communities will construct new community sewage treatment systems, which will eliminate approximately 156,600 gallons of untreated sewage per day from entering the Lower Mississippi River and Cedar River Basins (57 million gallons per year). An additional nine communities will receive technical assistance to begin or continue their projects to upgrade their sewage treatment systems. These projects will make significant progress towards the achievement of the Lower Mississippi River Basin TMDL for Fecal Coliform Bacteria and the goals of county water plans in Southeast Minnesota.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Linda,Dahl,"SE Minnesota Water Resources Board","Winona State University",Winona,MN,55987,507-457-5223,ldahl@winona.edu,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Dakota, Dodge, Fillmore, Freeborn, Goodhue, Houston, Le Sueur, Mower, Olmsted, Rice, Steele, Wabasha, Waseca, Winona",,"Cannon River, Cedar River, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Winona, Root River, Shell Rock River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/southeast-mn-wastewater-initiative,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34219,"Spent Lime Treatment System for Wakefield Lake",2016,300000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Stearns County Pollutant Loading Model","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 18.2 lbs of phosphorus and 2.384 tons of sediment.","Achieved proposed outcomes",81250,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",243750,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",1.18,"Ramsey-Washington Metro WD","Local/Regional Government","Wakefield Lake is in the Ramsey-Washington Metro Watershed District (RWMWD) and is impaired for excess phosphorus. Through the Wakefield Lake TMDL process, implementation activities have been identified which include partnerships with the City of Maplewood to install BMPs in the watershed to directly benefit Wakefield Lake. RWMWD has researched, monitored and field tested the use of spent lime for stormwater quality treatment. Spent lime consists of calcium and carbonate and is a byproduct of the drinking water treatment process that has properties that allow it to bind with dissolved phosphorus. When water containing dissolved phosphorus contacts the lime material, calcium from the lime binds with the phosphorus and forms calcium phosphate which is a solid material and does not dissolve in the storm water, thus remaining within the treatment system. Although this is still an emerging concept, three years of monitoring a test spent lime system has shown promising results for the removal of both total and dissolved phosphorus. Total phosphorus removal through the system is approximately 60% and total dissolved phosphorus removal is approximately 70%. With the help of this grant source, RWMWD hopes to install a full scale spent lime filtration system on a City of Maplewood owned lot just upstream of Wakefield Lake at the southwest corner of Frost Avenue and Kennard Street to treat stormwater flow before it reaches the lake. This treatment system will achieve nearly 50% of the needed phosphorus external load reductions to Wakefield Lake as identified in the TMDL. This is great news not only for the very popular Wakefield Lake and the visitors to the adjacent park system but also to its big brother, Lake Phalen, to which Wakefield Lake drains before it heads to the Mississippi River.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tina,Carstens,"Ramsey-Washington Metro WD",,,,,612-735-2751,tina@rwmwd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Ramsey,,"Mississippi River - Twin Cities",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/spent-lime-treatment-system-wakefield-lake,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34202,"Spring Park Subwatershed Analysis",2016,62398,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in a completed subwatershed analysis within the Spring Park Subwatershed. ",,,,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",62398,,"Members for Rice SWCD are: Gary Wagenbach, Jim Purfeerst, Richard Cook, Richard Peterson, Robert Duban",,"Rice SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Spring Park watershed is over 225 acres. Most of the watershed has been fully developed into a variety of residential, commercial, and institutional land uses. Project funds would be utilized to conduct a watershed analysis with the goal of identifying pollutant load sources and potential areas for structural stormwater BMPs for future retro-fit projects to reduce instances of localized flooding, reduce peak storm flows, and improve the quality of stormwater runoff discharging into Crocker's Creek. ",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Pahs,"Rice SWCD","1810 - 30th St NW",Faribault,MN,55021,507-332-5408,steven.pahs@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Rice,,"Cannon River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/spring-park-subwatershed-analysis,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Nicole Clapp ",
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2012,200000,,,,,,81824,Federal,,,,1.01,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2013,200000,,,,,,,,,,,1.01,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2014,100000,,,,,,,,,,,.5,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2015,100000,,,,,,,,,,,.81,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2016,108547,,,,,,,,,,,.67,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2017,200000,,,,,,,,,,,1.56,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2018,99999,,,,,,,,,,,.26,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2019,99999,,,,,,,,,,,.8,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2025,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (b) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices, cover crops, and other vegetative cover; assessing adoption of best management practices and other recommended practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2024,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (b) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices, cover crops, and other vegetative cover; assessing adoption of best management practices and other recommended practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ",,,,,1954307,268461,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2023,2585000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing adoption of best management practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ",,,,,2138119,275555,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2022,2585000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing adoption of best management practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ","The Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan was revised and updated in 2015 and the Groundwater Protection Rule went into effect in June 2019. The NFMP and GPR are being implemented to address nitrate from fertilizer in groundwater. Partnerships are established in vulnerable areas in support of groundwater protection: 36 local government units on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities 21 projects (SE Volunteer Network, Central Sands Volunteer Network, 18 Level 2 DWSMAs, RCPP) On average 39% of funds are passed through to local government units and research partners 13 on-farm nitrogen fertilizer BMP evaluation/demonstration sites On average about 98 NMI on-farm plots each year (92 standard plots, 6 advanced N-rate trials) engaging on average 98 famers and 27 crop advisers Regional and Township Testing: Approximately 32,880 private well owners have participated in either a one-time (snapshot) or long-term nitrate testing.                 ~ 650-900 of those private wells are tested annually through the Central Sands Private Well Network and Southeast Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network. 32,217 private wells in vulnerable townships have been tested through MDA’s Township Testing Program (2013-2019) Work completed in 344 vulnerable townships within 50 counties Overall, 9.1% (2,925) of the 32,217 wells tested in vulnerable areas exceeded the drinking water standard for nitrate 143 townships with ≥ 10% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (41%) 68 townships with 5-9 % of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (20%) 133 townships with <5% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (39%)   Groundwater Protection Rule: The MDA has completed a review of the monitoring data received from the Minnesota Department of Health in 2021 and 2022 and determined the following: 8 DWSMAs are designated as Level 1 with nitrate levels at or above 5.4 mg/L but less than 8 mg/L  21 DWSMAs are designated as Level 2 with nitrate levels at or above 8 mg/L  10 DWSMAs need more information before a level determination can be made In 2020, 61 on-farm demonstrations were located within 1 mile of the boundary of or within the Fall Nitrogen Fertilizer Restriction area or Level 2 DWSMAs.  (This includes all NMI trials, RRFSP, Discovery Farms MN, Red River Valley Drainage Water Management, Rosholt, and SE MN BMP programs.)   Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs are revised based on research: U of M nitrogen fertilizer rate studies at two regional locations led to the development of new nitrogen rate guidelines for irrigated corn (""Fertilizing Corn Grown on Irrigated Sandy Soils”) 12 applied research projects evaluate(d) BMPs (6 on-going) Rosholt Farm: 2 ongoing, 1 completed Clean Water Research:  2 ongoing, 5 completed Other research (funded by N in Groundwater): 2 ongoing   Education and outreach programs help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs to farmers and crop advisers: Nutrient management Funding two UM-Extension Educators – Agricultural Water Quality Protection positions Four state-wide conferences reaching over 1,200 attendees (virtual in 2021, both in-person and virtual in 2022) and impacting over 11,675,000 acres (Nitrogen & Nutrient Management) Continuing education credits offered to Certified Crop Advisers Minnesota Irrigators Program: Intensive three-day training program for irrigators and SWCD technical staff on applying nutrient and water BMPs for irrigated crop production.   Weather data and Irrigation management 14 weather stations - Central Minnesota Ag Weather Network (weather info available online in real-time). Stations are now included in the North Dakota Ag Weather Network with greater outreach to irrigators. 17 websites and 2 mobile apps utilize the data from the weather stations 10 counties use weather data as part of an online irrigation scheduling tool in Central Minnesota 17 weather information requests were received from 10 different researchers and technical staff from state agencies and U of M ",,,,2177280,273502,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2021,2585000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. ",,"The Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan was revised and updated in 2015 and the Groundwater Protection Rule went into effect in June 2019. The NFMP and GPR are being implemented to address nitrate from fertilizer in groundwater. Partnerships are established in vulnerable areas in support of groundwater protection 36 local government units on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities 21 projects (SE Volunteer Network, Central Sands Volunteer Network, 18 Level 2 DWSMAs, Precision Irrigation Cost-Share) On average 39% of funds are passed through to local government units and research partners 15 on-farm nitrogen fertilizer BMP evaluation sites Regional and Township Testing: Approximately 32,880 private well owners have participated in either a one-time (snapshot) or long-term nitrate testing.                ~ 650-900 of those private wells are tested annually through the Central Sands Private Well Network and Southeast Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network. 32,217 wells private wells in vulnerable townships have been tested through MDA’s Township Testing Program (2013-2019) Work completed in 344 vulnerable townships within 50 counties Overall, 9.1% (2,925) of the 32,217 wells tested in vulnerable areas exceeded the drinking water standard for nitrate 143 townships with ≥ 10% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (41%) 68 townships with 5-9 % of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (20%) 133 townships with <5% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (39%) Groundwater Protection Rule: The MDA has completed a review of the monitoring data received from the Minnesota Department of Health in 2021 and 2022 and determined the following: 8 DWSMAs are designated as Level 1 with nitrate levels at or above 5.4 mg/L but less than 8 mg/L  21 DWSMAs are designated as Level 2 with nitrate levels at or above 8 mg/L  10 DWSMAs need more information before a level determination can be made   Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs are revised based on research: U of M nitrogen fertilizer rate studies at two regional locations led to the development of new nitrogen rate guidelines for irrigated corn (""Fertilizing Corn Grown on Irrigated Sandy Soils”) Twelve applied research and on-farm projects evaluation Best Management Practices (BMPs) (6 on-going) Rosholt Farm Evaluating Crop Yield and Water Quality Impacts of Nitrogen Management, Cover Crops and Living Mulches in Irrigated Corn and Soybean (PI Fernandez) (on-going) Optimizing Nitrogen and Water Management under Irrigation and Quantifying Water Quality and Crop Yield Impacts (PI Sharma) (on-going) Evaluation and performance of different irrigation scheduling methods and their impact on corn production and nitrate leaching in central sands region of Minnesota (PI Sharma) (completed)   Clean Water Research Cover crop effectiveness in a series of farm BMPs, 2012-2019 (PI Lenhart) (completed) The Cover Crops, Water, and Nitrogen Nexus: How do they impact corn and soybean production and the environment? (PI Garcia y Garcia) (completed) The Minnesota Cover Crop Guide (PI Cates) (completed) Adjusting corn nitrogen rates using a preplant nitrate test to reduce potential for N loss in South-Central and Southeastern Minnesota (PI Kaiser) (waiting for final report) Improved Design, Performance, and Implementation of Saturated Buffers (PI Sands) (completed, in review) Development of the nitrogen BMP effectiveness tool for groundwater protection in Minnesota under varying soil types and climatic conditions (PI Mulla & Lazarus) (on-going) Recommendations for residual soil nitrogen testing and N rate adjustment (PI Fernandez) (on-going) USGS Age Dating USGS Predictive N Model On-Farm Demonstrations (15) Nutrient Management Initiative – Advanced Plots (MDA/Kaiser) Southeast Minnesota Nitrogen BMP Program (MDA/Jeff Vetsch)               Education and outreach programs help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs to farmers and crop advisers: Nutrient management Funding two UM-Extension Educators – Agricultural Water Quality Protection positions Four state-wide conferences reaching over 1,200 attendees (virtual in 2021, both in-person and virtual in 2022) and impacting over 11,675,000 acres (Nitrogen & Nutrient Management) Continuing education credits offered to Certified Crop Advisers Minnesota Irrigators Program: Intensive three-day training program for irrigators and SWCD technical staff on applying nutrient and water BMPs for irrigated crop production. Weather data and Irrigation management 14 weather stations - Central Minnesota Ag Weather Network (weather info available online in real-time). Stations are now included in the North Dakota Ag Weather Network with greater outreach to irrigators. 17 websites and 2 mobile apps utilize the data from the weather stations 10 counties use weather data as part of an online irrigation scheduling tool in Central Minnesota 17 weather information requests were received from 10 different researchers and technical staff from state agencies and U of M ",,,,1994814,274918,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2020,2585000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ","Partnerships 26 local government units partner with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities 50% of Clean Water Funds are passed through to local government units and research partners Groundwater Protection Rule Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMAs) that participate in mitigation activities  6 DWSMAs are designated as Level 1 with nitrate levels at or above 5.4 mg/L but less than 8 mg/L 17 DWSMAs are designated as Level 2 with nitrate levels at or above 8 mg/L Best Management Practices (BMPs) Four state-wide conferences promoted Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs to over 575 farmers and crop advisers, impacting 6,200,000 acres 9 applied research and on-farm projects are evaluating BMPs ",,,,1831883,211874,,11,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2019,2086000,"2017 Legislative Session - CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON H. F. No. 707 -Legacy Funding - ","M.L. 2017: (b) $2,085,000 the first year and $2,086,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1980124,193507,,10.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2018,2085000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2017, Regular Session, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (b) $2,085,000 the first year and $2,086,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,2484201,224865,,10.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2017,2585000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (b) $2,586,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; monitoring for pesticides when nitrate is detected; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,3349185,216545,,10.75,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2016,2586000,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (b) $2,586,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; monitoring for pesticides when nitrate is detected; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,2797007,230400,,"13.45 (includes 2.6 FTEs working on pesticide sampling in private wells)","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2015,2500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013:(b) $2,500,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrates in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation, including a substantial increase of monitoring of private wells in cooperation with the commissioner of health, monitoring for pesticides when nitrates are detected, and promoting and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices to protect groundwater from degradation. Of this amount, $75,000 may be used for accelerating the update for the commercial manure applicator manual. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1773017,153876,,8.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2014,2500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013:(b) $2,500,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrates in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation, including a substantial increase of monitoring of private wells in cooperation with the commissioner of health, monitoring for pesticides when nitrates are detected, and promoting and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices to protect groundwater from degradation. Of this amount, $75,000 may be used for accelerating the update for the commercial manure applicator manual.   ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,734113,66278,,8.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2013,850000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L.2011: (b) $850, 000 the first year and $850,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in high-risk areas and regionally and to promote and evaluate regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,586942,12000,,4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2012,850000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L.2011: (b) $850,000 the first year and $850,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in high-risk areas and regionally and to promote and evaluate regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to individual project pages. See ""related projects"". ","Please refer to individual project pages. See ""related projects"". ",,,,567100,12000,,4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2010,375000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (c) $375,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are to increase groundwater and drinking water protection from agricultural chemicals, primarily nutrients. M.L.2011: (b) $850, 000 the first year and $850,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in high-risk areas and regionally and to promote and evaluate regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,488043,10540,,"0.2 FTE (2010), 3.2 FTEs (2011)","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2025,1500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance; research, demonstration, and promotion projects on properly implementing best management practices and vegetative cover; and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2024,1500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance; research, demonstration, and promotion projects on properly implementing best management practices and vegetative cover; and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ",,,,,1355261,198301,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2023,1500000,"M.L. 2021, 1st Special Session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 3","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on properly implementing best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ",,,,,1341682,188182,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2022,1500000,"M.L. 2021, 1st Special Session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2021: (d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on properly implementing best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ","Technical assistance activities are a primary vehicle to work with the agricultural community to promote best management practices. As of October 2022, the MDA has cumulatively engaged >18,000 ag producers, crop advisors and Local Government Units at >450 education and outreach events. Implemented 677 Nutrient Management Initiative field trials in 2015-2021 Worked with an average of 98 farmers and 27 crop advisers each year on nutrient management trials The MDA maintains 20 active edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations around the state. Edge of Field data has been used for a variety of computer simulation and model calibrations including PTMApp, Adapt-N, SWAT, and the Runoff Risk Advisory Tool. Data are used to support the State’s Watershed Approach and referenced in numerous WRAPs reports. Data from Discovery Farms Minnesota, the Root River Field to Stream Partnership, the Clay County Drainage Site and Red River Valley Drainage Water Management have all been shared with local, state and national partners. Data has been used in peer-reviewed journal articles, large meta-analysis and to engage local farmers and discuss the effectiveness of conservation practices. The Root River Field to Stream Partnership (RRFSP) has helped identify critical areas and worked with farmers to implement conservation practices. This project has helped install and support: Over 105,000 feet of grassed waterways 15 new water and sediment control basins and catchment ponds Rehabilitation of an outdated flood control structure Planting of 370 acres of cover crops Feedlot improvements include an increase in manure storage to reduce manure applications on frozen soil, moving milk house wastewater systems, and abandonment of a feedlot in a high-risk location The highest runoff risk field in one of the study areas (80 acres) was enrolled into the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). An additional 50 acres was enrolled in other areas. Over 50% of the highest priority conservation practices were addressed by the end of 2017, about 70% addressed as of end of 2022. $1.8 million in state and federal conservation funds were distributed across three watersheds over a five-year period (60% on vegetative & structural practices, 40% on feedlot & manure waste improvements) In the glacial till headwaters watershed, 64% of the High Risk Area has been treated (after 2021), prior to 2018 only 8% of the High Risk Area had been treated. The RRFSP has leveraged Clean Water Fund dollars with over $5 million in private, state, and federal dollars to support conservation efforts. If CWF dollars from other agencies is excluded, over $3.5 million has been leveraged.                                                                                                                                                                               The Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project (RRV DWM) is evaluating drainage water management on operating farms as a practice to mitigate flooding and add water quality and quantity benefits. The project has shown that:  Controlled drainage is a viable option in the lake bottom landscape of the Red River Basin During 2017-2020, controlled drainage reduced nitrate-N losses by 22% and reduced drainage volume by over 13% compared to conventional subsurface drainage During 2018-2020, a saturated buffer had capacity to treat 92% of the drainage water from an 11-acre research field and removed over 76% of the nitrate in the drainage water (including water through the bypass) Since 2015, nearly 3,500 people have been engaged in RRV DWM outreach presentations, and field days/events. (Overall: 49 presentations, 19 field days/events, 4 poster displays, 2 trade journal articles, 3 publications/reports, 2 data requests) The RRV DWM has leveraged Clean Water Fund dollars with over $1 million in private, Local Government Unit and federal dollars to support drainage research and outreach. Project is a partner site for the USDA-funded $5M Transforming Drainage project. ",,,,1106429,158252,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2021,1500000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2--S.F. No. 3, Art. 2","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,947074,155671,,5.34,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2020,1500000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2--S.F. No. 3, Art. 2","d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota Total dollars leveraged ","Edge-of-field monitoring 26 active edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational in 2020 Overall there have been 71 edge-of-field stations throughout the life of the program, some projects have ended. Data has been used for a variety of computer simulation and model calibrations including PTMApp, Adapt-N, SWAT, and the Runoff Risk Advisory Tool. It has been used in peer-reviewed journal articles and large meta-analysis. Data continues to be shared with local, state, and national partners, and local farmers to discuss the effectiveness of conservation practices, and continues to be used to support the State’s Watershed Approach. The data is referenced in numerous WRAPs reports. Outreach From 2015-2020, about 15,000 ag producers, crop advisers and Local Government Units participated in 327 education and outreach events. Funds leveraged From 2015-2020 about $6.5 million has been leveraged from edge-of-field sites to support conservation efforts For additional measures please refer to individual project pages. See ""related projects"". ","achieved proposed outcomes",,,1127427,159158,,6.9,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2019,1125000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1115022,135259,,7.0,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2018,1125000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1116970,188976,,7.0,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2017,1125000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1261327,151885,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2016,1125000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1320290,149902,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2015,1500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 2","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota   ","The MDA conducts on-farm demonstrations and evaluations to provide accurate data on water quality effects of specific practices and help farmers understand and adopt best management practices (BMPs). On-farm work is conducted at 17 sites using 37 automated monitoring stations. The MDA works closely with 20 local government partners across the state. To date, over 50 field days, tours and educational events have been held to share results with interested farmers, conservation professionals and other stakeholders. The number of data requests for information from edge-of-field monitoring sites continues to increase. For example, the National Weather Service has requested edge-of-field data to validate / calibrate their Runoff Risk Advisory Service. Specifically, they are interested to know if runoff is actually occurring at times when their predictive model suggests the likelihood is high. Other data requests have come from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program, Water Resources Center (U of M) and others.   ",,,,1049412,132877,,6.85,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2014,1500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 2","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,706285,94509,,8.5,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2013,775000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,272755,12945,,5.85,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2012,775000," M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,268985,10515,,5.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2010,695000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (d) $695,000 the first year and $1,570,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance related to ways agricultural practices contribute to restoring impaired waters and assist with the development of TMDL plans. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,706285,94509,,"1 FTE (2010), 3.95 FTE (2011)","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,,
34211,"Stearns County Ditch 26 Drainage Management",2016,160000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Multipurpose Drainage Management 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Enhanced drainage inspections","This project has resulted in approximately 25 acre feet per year of stormwater being retained and 3000 tons of sediment and 2400 pounds of phosphorous per year being reduced.","Achieved proposed outcomes",6250,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",25000,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.06,"Sauk River WD","Local/Regional Government","Stearns County Ditch 26 (CD 26) is a 20 mile channelized section of Getchell Creek, a primary tributary to the Sauk River that is impaired for turbidity, E.coli and aquatic macroinvertebrate bio-assessment. The Stearns County Ditch 26 Drainage Management Project will address the stormwater runoff concerns identified within this public drainage system. Alternative intake structures to manage nutrients and mitigative measures will be taken to retain water on the upland properties and minimize flow rate and velocity. Combined techniques of bioengineering and other innovative techniques will target reductions of upland nutrient contributions through the drainage systems, as well as minimize the effects of sediment contribution to Getchell Creek and the Sauk River. CWF dollars will be utilized to provide financial assistance to landowners for BMP implementation and technical assistance.",,,2016-02-24,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Lynn,Nelson,"Sauk River WD","524 4th St","Sauk Centre",MN,56378,320-352-2231,lynn@srwdmn.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Stearns,,"Sauk River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stearns-county-ditch-26-drainage-managment,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2025,2550000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(a)","$2,550,000 the first year and $2,550,000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring. ","In FY25 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 35 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,100 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will contract with the USGS to collect stream flow measurements at 30 sites.  Plans also include continued website upgrades to update all hydrologic websites to have the same look and ability to download multiple types of data for more than 5 stations at a time. ",,,,,,,,,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2024,2550000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(a)","$2,550,000 the first year and $2,550,000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring. ","In FY24 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 20 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,160 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will contract with the USGS to collect stream flow measurements at 30 sites.  Plans also include website upgrades to provide additional flow and water quality information and functionality of data downloads at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY24 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at 18 locations. We collected almost 1,100 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected stream flow measurements at 30 sites. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state and continuous water quality data collected by MPCA are now available on our Cooperative Stream Gaging website. ",,,,2094641,359526,,14.6,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2023,2000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring ","In FY23 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading three gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,150 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will contract with the USGS to collect stream flow measurements at 30 sites.  Plans also include website upgrades to provide additional flow and water quality information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY23 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at five locations. We collected almost 1,190 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected stream flow measurements at 30 sites. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state. ",,,,1762341,301473,,14.8,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2022,2000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring ","In FY22 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading four gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,300 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. Plans also include website upgrades to provide additional flow and water quality information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY22 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at four locations. We collected almost 1,180 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected stream flow measurements at 30 sites. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state. ",,,,1704137,237200,,13.95,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2021,2000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring. ","In FY21 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 4 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1100 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will continue contracting with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to develop regional bedload and suspended-sediment datasets from the sediment samples taken at 50 sites between 2007-2020. Plans also include website upgrades to provide higher-resolution flow information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY21 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at three locations. We collected 1140 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS finished their bedload sediment transport project and wrote the final report. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state including adding additional map layers such as the US Drought Monitor and additional parameters such as water quality collected by our partners at MPCA. ",,,,1777467,224390,,15.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2020,2000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring. ","In FY20 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 12 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1300 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will continue contracting with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to collect up to 30 sediment samples at the 50 sites sampled between 2007-2019 to fill gaps needed to assess bedload sediment transport. Plans also include website upgrades to provide higher-resolution flow information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY20 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at 8 locations. We collected 1257 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected sediment at 30 sites to assess bedload sediment transport. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state. ",,,,1734450,242562,,15.4,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2019,1950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1950000 the first year and $1950000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY19 the DNR will expand the stream monitoring network with one additional gage and upgrade 10 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1 300 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will continue contracting with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to collect sediment in seven streams to assess bedload sediment transport. Plans also include website upgrades to provide higher-resolution flow information at the existing stream gages across the state.","In FY19 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by adding 1 additional gage and upgrading equipment at 16 locations. We collected 1 349 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected sediment in 7 streams to assess bedload sediment transport. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state.",,,,1665825,221621,,15.5,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2018,1950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1950000 the first year and $1950000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY18 the DNR will upgrade the stream monitoring network by adding new equipment to three gages. We will collect approximately 1 300 stream flow measurements and compile over 200 records at continuous stream gage sites for use in watershed assessments throughout the state. We will continue to contract with the US Geological Survey (USGS) to collect sediment in 11 streams to assess bedload sediment transport. Finally as part of an overall upgrade to our cooperative data system we will continue to transition to a new more efficient database to house all of our stream flow and groundwater data.","In FY18 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading nine existing locations. We collected 1 511 stream flow measurements and compiled records for 60 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. The transition to a new more efficient database in FY18 resulted in fewer records compiled than the previous year. The transition is complete and the new cooperative data system holds all of our stream flow and groundwater data. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected sediment in 11 streams to assess bedload sediment transport.",,,,1875551,221437,,15.7,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2017,2000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","(a) $2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY17 the DNR will expand the stream monitoring network by adding five new gages. We will collect approximately 1 335 stream flow measurements and compile over 200 records at continuous stream gage sites for use in watershed assessments throughout the state. We will continue to contract with the US Geological Survey (USGS) to collect sediment in streams to assess bedload sediment transport. As part of an overall upgrade to our cooperative data system we will transition to a new more efficient database to house all of our stream flow and groundwater data.","In FY17 the DNR expanded the stream monitoring network with one additional stream gages and upgraded nine existing locations. We collected 1 345 stream flow measurements and compiled approximately 200 records at continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the US Geological Survey (USGS) collected sediment in streams at 11 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.",,,,1842779,183087,,16.1,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2016,2000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","(a) $2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY16 the DNR will continue to expand the stream monitoring network by adding 11 new gages. We will collect 1300 stream flow measurements and compile 180 records for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. We will also contract with the USGS to collect sediment in streams at 10 sites to assess bedload sediment transport. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website will be upgraded to provide more features and easier access including a mobile platform and additional data.","In FY16 the DNR expanded the stream monitoring network with five additional stream gages and upgraded six existing locations. We collected 1 255 stream flow measurements and compiled 220 records at continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the US Geological Survey (USGS) collected sediment in streams at 11 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.",,,,1706951,184191,,16.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2015,2000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring including the installation of additional monitoring gauges and monitoring necessary to determine the relationship between stream flow and groundwater. ","In FY15 the DNR will continue to expand the stream monitoring network by adding 30 new gages. Scientists will collect 950 stream flow measurements and compile 180 records for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. The DNR will also contract with the USGS to collect sediment in streams at 13 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.","In FY15 DNR scientists installed or upgraded 22 new gages as part of ongoing work to establish and maintain a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. Many of these sites now have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. We installed fewer gages than proposed because of difficulty accessing some sites because fewer new gages are needed in some watersheds. We collected 1 173 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages that are used in in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. We compiled 116 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR-operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. We compiled fewer records than proposed because we had fewer trained staff to do the work. New staff are now trained are working on reviewing and compiling the backlogged records. This work is done in cooperation with MPCA; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for identifying impaired waters. We also contracted with the USGS to collect 258 samples of sediment in streams from 13 sites to assess bedload and suspended sediment transport and we provided hydrologic analyses of historical data and modeling for seven watersheds. This information helps evaluate surface water and ground water quantities over time.",,,,2072048,192587,,13.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2014,2000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring including the installation of additional monitoring gauges and monitoring necessary to determine the relationship between stream flow and groundwater. ","In FY14 DNR will continue to expand the stream monitoring network by adding 30 new gages. Scientists will collect 1 000 stream flow measurements and compile 130 records for continuous real-time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. DNR will also contract with the USGS to collect sediment in streams at 20 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.","In FY14 DNR scientists installed or upgraded 36 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. Many of these sites now have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. Scientists collected 853 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. Staff compiled 163 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR-operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. DNR also contracted with the USGS to collect 126 samples of sediment in streams to assess bedload sediment transport. Staff also provided hydrologic analyses of historical data for three major watersheds. This information aids in evaluating surface water and ground water quantities through time and the potential causes for these changes. This work is done in cooperation with MPCA; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for identifying impaired waters.",,,,1738591,148338,,13.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2013,1825000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1825000 the first year and $1825000 the second year are for the continuation and expansion of stream flow monitoring.","In FY13 DNR will continue to grow the stream monitoring network by adding 20 new gages. Scientists will collect 1080 stream flow measurements and compile 150 records for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds.","In FY13 DNR scientists installed or upgraded 19 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. All of these sites now have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. Field staff collected 710 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. Hydrologists compiled 116 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. DNR also contracted with the USGS to collect 127 samples of sediment in streams to assess bedload sediment transport. The number of records and samples is significantly smaller than proposed because of a drought that caused low or zero flow conditions. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters.",,,,1407259,172634,,8.0,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2012,1825000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1825000 the first year and $1825000 the second year are for the continuation and expansion of stream flow monitoring.","In FY12 DNR will continue to grow the stream monitoring network by adding 22 new gages. An additional 330 stream flow measurements will be collected 30 records will be compiled for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters. DNR will also coordinate with MPCA’s lake monitoring to install lake level gages on priority lakes and continue to ensure stream gage and flow measurement data are available for critical flood forecasting if needed.","In FY12 DNR scientists installed 8 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. Some of these sites have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. Field staff collected 919 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds and compiled 131 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds.",,,,973186,263700,,6.0,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2011,865000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","* Maintain existing network of 65 stream gages used for TMDL studies * Install calibrate stream 11 new streamflow gages with satellite telemetry for real time data access * Hydrology/hydraulic analysis of lake outlets at 10 lakes to support TMDL work * Develop interagency Monitoring Plan for surface and groundwater","In FY11 DNR scientists installed 2 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network to allow automated continuous measurements to be taken at sites across the state. Some of these sites have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. This is in addition to the 4 new gages and 4 upgraded gages installed in FY10. Field staff collected 334 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds and compiled 30 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. In FY10 field staff collected 323 stream flow measurements and compiled 28 annual daily flow quantity records. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters.",,,,,,,,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2010,645000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.",,"In FY 10 DNR scientists installed 4 new gages and upgraded 4 gages in a stream gage network to allow automated continuous measurements to be taken across the state. Field staff collected 323 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds and compiled 28 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters.",,,,,,,,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,,
34265,"SWWD Lakes Targeted Retrofit",2016,180000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","For this project, phosphorus is captured through Right-of-Way biofiltration, iron-enhanced filtration and reuse as irrigation. The project will reduce annual TP loading to Powers, Wilmese, and Colby Lakes by 2.25, 17.5, and 4.5 lbs/yr respectively. ","This project resulted in an estimated reduction of 20 lb. of phosphorus per year",,45000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",180000,,"Members for South Washington WD are: Brian Johnson, Don Pereira, Jack Lavold, Mike Madigan",,"South Washington WD","Local/Regional Government","The South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) and its partners will continue restoration of Colby, Wilmes, and Powers Lakes through coordinated implementation of targeted watershed retrofits as part of planned roadway rehabilitation projects. Watershed retrofits will include right of way bioretention, iron enhanced sand filtration, and stormwater reuse for irrigation. These practices represent some of the most cost-effective options remaining to provide the nutrient loading reductions necessary to protect and restore SWWD's lakes.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,John,Loomis,"South Washington WD","2302 Tower Drive",Woodbury,MN,55125,651-714-3714,jloomis@ci.woodbury.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Washington,,"Mississippi River - Twin Cities",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/swwd-lakes-targeted-retrofit,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34259,"Targeting Implementation in the Blue Earth & Le Sueur Watersheds",2016,212000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Proposed measurable outcomes TBD","The GIS dataset has been completed as proposed.","Achieved proposed outcomes",,,,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",,"Greater Blue Earth River Basin Alliance","Local/Regional Government","To be able to manage resources in the Blue Earth and Le Sueur Watersheds into the future and have a positive effect on water quality, resource managers need high quality accurate data to support decision making of best management practice (BMP) implementation. Digital elevation data is a valuable resource for modeling water flow, however in its current state it cannot represent water conveyance through features such as roadways. These flow barriers limit the accurate use of data for recently developed targeting tools identifying BMP suitability and effectiveness down to the field scale. To analyze watersheds at this small of scale, there is a need to develop data products that truly represent the hydrology of the landscape. Localized efforts to create hydrologic modification of LiDAR derived Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) have been conducted across small portions of the watersheds, leaving a patchwork of data products available. However, these products are not always consistent or available watershed wide. This project will develop a consistent set of GIS data across the 2,325 square miles in the watersheds by incorporating (NOT duplicating) the patchwork of data that have already been developed. These standardized data products will serve as a means to increase the implementation of on the ground projects and practices within the watersheds by utilizing Prioritize, Target and Measure Application (PTMApp) and Ag Conservation Planning Framework (ACPF) toolset to target specific BMPs that will have measurable and cost-effective water quality benefits. End products will also serve as foundational data for moving forward with One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) and can be integrated and reused in future targeted watershed planning efforts.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Kay,Gross,"Greater Blue Earth River Basin Alliance","339 9th St",Windom,MN,56101,507-831-1153,kay.clark@windomnet.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Blue Earth, Faribault, Freeborn, Jackson, Martin, Steele, Waseca",,"Blue Earth River, Le Sueur River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/targeting-implementation-blue-earth-le-sueur-watersheds,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34234,"Thompson Lake Water Quality Improvement and WRAPS Implementation",2016,576000,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Projects and Practices 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Modeling of the proposed treatment indicates an average annual phosphorus load reduction to Thompson Lake ranging from 37-39%, or an estimated 48 lbs/year, as well as a sediment reduction of 12 tons/yearModeliing of the proposed treatment indicates an average annual phosphorus load reduction to Thompson Lake ranging from 37-39%, or an estimated 48 lbs/year, as well as a sediment reduction of 12 tons/year","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 49.6 pounds of Phosphorus, 12.9 tons of Sediment, 2.1 acre-feet of Volume Reduced","Achieved proposed outcomes",377875,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",576000,9830,"Members for Lower Mississippi River WMO are: Anne Weber, Bob Bullard, Chris Nielsen, Edward (Hunter) Blaeser, Jill Smith, Joseph Meyers, Kevin Chamberlain, Laura Zanmiller, Marian Brown, Marilyn Lundberg, Mary Jeanne Schneeman, Molly Park, Richard Williams, Scott Deyo, Sharon Lencowski, Tom Seaberg",,"Lower Mississippi River WMO","Local/Regional Government","Thompson Lake is a shallow lake located in the City of West St. Paul, within the Lower Mississippi River Watershed Management Organization (LMRWMO). The 7-acre lake receives runoff from a 175-acre urban watershed that was developed in the 1950's and currently provides very little stormwater treatment. The eastern shoreline is within Thompson County Park, which features a fishing pier, event center, and miles of regionally connected trails. The west shoreline of the lake abuts the St. Croix Lutheran School. Thompson Lake is impaired for recreational use due to excessive nutrients, and is on the MPCA's 2014 Impaired Waters list. A watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS) study and total maximum daily load (TMDL) developed from 2012 to 2014 identified watershed runoff as the primary source of phosphorus to the lake; the TMDL identified a phosphorus waste load reduction of 30% necessary to achieve MPCA water quality standards. The proposed project will treat stormwater runoff prior to discharge into Thompson Lake, thereby reducing phosphorus concentrations in the lake, improving lake clarity, and leading to removal from the Impaired Waters list. The project includes construction of a series of upland stormwater basins at the north end of the lake, inside Thompson County Park, to treat runoff from 83% of the watershed (145 acres). The project will include sediment forebays at storm sewer outfalls, a stormwater wetland/pond, and a stormwater reuse irrigation system that draws water from the wetland and irrigates nearby parkland. Water quality modeling indicates that the proposed project will reduce phosphorus loading to the lake by 39%, achieving the waste load reduction identified in the TMDL. The project will provide additional public benefits including native habitat enhancement, education opportunities, trail improvements, and improved aesthetics. The project will be completed in partnership with the City of West St. Paul and Dakota County. ",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joe,Barten,"Lower Mississippi River WMO","4100 220th Street W, Suite 102",Farmington,MN,55024,651-480-7784,joe.barten@co.dakota.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Dakota,,"Mississippi River - Twin Cities",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/thompson-lake-water-quality-improvement-and-wraps-implementation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board ","Annie Felix-Gerth ",
33828,"Todd County Soil and Water Conservation District Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG) - Mississippi River-Brainerd & Sartell Watersheds Lake Sampling",2016,25877,,,,,,,,,,,0.22,"Todd County Soil and Water Conservation District","Local/Regional Government","The goal of this project is to conduct water quality monitoring at the ten lakes within the Todd County portions of the Mississippi River Brainerd and the one lake within the Todd County portion of the Mississippi River Sartell. Sampling will be done once per month between May 2016 and September 2016 and then again once per month May 2017 through September 2017. Water quality parameters include total phosphorus, chlorophyll-a, sulfate (Twin, Lady, Little Swan and Beauty in 2016 only), Secchi depth, temperature, conductivity, DO, pH, chloride (June 2016 only) and hardness (June 2016 only). ",,"Mississippi River - Sartell Watershed Mississippi River - Brainerd Watershed ",2015-03-02,2018-01-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Shannon,Wettstein,"Todd County Soil and Water Conservation District","215 1st Avenue South Suite 104","Long Prairie",MN,56347,"(320) 732-2644",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Crow Wing",,"Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Sartell",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/todd-county-soil-and-water-conservation-district-surface-water-assessment-grant-swag-missis,,,,
34256,"Todd County Septic Inventory V",2016,49529,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","This project will result in a a feasibility study of Shattuck Saint Mary's to assess and quantify the extent of erosion and pollutant loading, identify critical source areas and recommended the most cost-efficient best management practices. ","The septic inventory has been completed as proposed.","Achieved proposed outcomes",17338,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",69350,2050,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.01,"Todd County","Local/Regional Government","The proposed work will be the fifth septic inventory effort conducted by Todd County and will include eight lakes, 431 parcels, and 277 established addresses. Three of the lakes - Cedar, Long Higgens, and Pauley are located in the Sauk River Watershed District's Sauk Lake Management Unit which is a high priority for improvement. These are the last three lakes of any size to be completed in the Sauk River Watershed portion of Todd County. Nitrogen and phosphorus levels are an issue through the watershed and this management unit in particular. Five Todd County lakes located in the Mississippi River Brainerd watershed will also be inventoried. The TMDL and WRAPS are scheduled to be developed starting in 2016 and the proposed work will supply needed information related to the status of septic systems there. These five lakes will represent about half of the developed lakes in the Todd County portion of the Mississippi River Brainerd watershed. Previous work in the Swan River subwatershed portion of this watershed identified nutrient levels as a target to improve water quality. Reaching for full compliance with septic rules and standards will help reach water quality goals.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Tim,Stieber,"Todd County","215 1st Ave S Ste 104","Long Prairie",MN,56347,320-732-4325,tim.stieber@co.todd.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Todd,,"Mississippi River - Brainerd, Sauk River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/todd-county-septic-inventory-v,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34207,"Traverse County Ditch 17",2016,204105,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Multipurpose Drainage Management 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","It is estimated that this project will result in sediment loading will be reduced by 340 tons per year and phosphorus loading reduced by 700 lbs per year . ",,,206745,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",204105,,"Members for Bois de Sioux WD are: Allen Wold, Doug Dahlen, Jerome Deal, John Kapphahn, Kurt Erlandson, Linda Vavra, Ron Vold, Scott Gillespie",0.12,"Bois de Sioux WD","Local/Regional Government","The Bois de Sioux Watershed District intends to begin a program to repair the legal ditches it owns and maintains for the purpose of improving water quality within the watershed and downstream receiving waters. The intent of this effort is to complete a pilot project to a legal ditch system that is in disrepair and use it as an example to educate landowners along other legal ditches on the importance of water quality. This pilot project consists of the construction of berms and side inlet culverts for sediment control along Traverse County Ditch #17 (TCD 17) and its single branch (B1) . This modification, also known as a retrofit, will be completed as a repair under MN Statues 103E.021, Subd. 6 which will ensure these erosion control features become a permanent part of the legal ditch. TCD 17 flows west to east and outlets into Twelve Mile Creek eight miles northeast of Wheaton, MN. Twelve Mile Creek flows north to the Mustinka River which ultimately enters Lake Traverse. Twelve Mile Creek and the Mustinka River have well documented issues regarding the exceedance of TMDL for turbidity, phosphorus, and overall poor biota. TCD 17 has a watershed of approximately 4.5 square miles, the land is used primarily for agricultural production. Berms and intercept culverts along legal ditch systems help to prevent sediment transport at the source and reduce turbidity downstream. The TCD 17 retrofit is aimed to be the first of many legal ditch retrofit projects within the BdSWD . By completing this retrofit it is estimated to reduce sediment loading by 340 tons/year and phosphorus loading by 700 lbs/year while working to restore and protect water resources for public use and public health. ",,,2016-03-07,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jon,Roeschlein,"Bois de Sioux WD","704 S Highway 75",Wheaton,MN,56296,320-563-4185,bdswd@frontiernet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Traverse,,"Mustinka River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/traverse-county-ditch-17,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Nicole Clapp ",
34296,"University of Minnesota Stormwater Research",2016,550000,,,,,,,,,,,6.4,"University of Minnesota: Sponsored Projects Administration","Public College/University","Cognizant to the needs of the stormwater community, a group that has engaged in stormwater research at the University of Minnesota (UMN) has developed a research program for the biennium that addresses pressing needs: a stormwater research roadmap and framework for priority needs, research required to improve stormwater pond maintenance, and information transfer related to these needs. These research components and their results have significant implications and practicality to the stormwater research community, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, local units of government, and other stakeholders.",,,2016-04-27,2018-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jeffrey,Peterson,"University of Minnesota: Sponsored Projects Administration","450 McNamara Center 200 Oak Street Southeast",Minneapolis,MN,55455-2070,"(612) 626-7441",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring, Planning, Research","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/university-minnesota-stormwater-research,,,,
33258,"Upper Mississippi Basin Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF) Model Extension",2016,68505,,,,,,,,,,,0.29,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","This project will extend the simulation period for the Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF) models for the Grand Rapids, Brainerd, Crow Wing, Redeye, Long Prairie, Sartell, Sauk, St. Cloud, and Crow watersheds, and review and comment on the calibration. ",,"Redeye River WatershedMississippi River - Grand Rapids WatershedCrow Wing River WatershedMississippi River - Brainerd Watershed",2016-01-22,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Charles P",Regan,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Aitkin, Becker, Benton, Carlton, Carver, Cass, Crow Wing, Douglas, Hennepin, Hubbard, Itasca, Kandiyohi, McLeod, Meeker, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Otter Tail, Pope, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wadena, Wright",,"Crow Wing River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Redeye River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/upper-mississippi-basin-hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-model-extension,,,,
33260,"Upper Mississippi Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF) Recalibration and Extension",2016,71525,,,,,,,,,,,0.46,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","This project will extend, calibrate, and validate watershed models using the Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF) watershed model for the Mississippi Headwaters, Leech Lake, Pine, and South Fork Crow Watersheds. ",,"South Fork Crow River WatershedPine River WatershedMississippi River - Headwaters WatershedLeech Lake River Watershed",2016-01-25,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Charles P",Regan,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Aitkin, Becker, Beltrami, Carver, Cass, Clearwater, Crow Wing, Hennepin, Hubbard, Itasca, Kandiyohi, McLeod, Meeker, Renville, Sibley, Wright",,"Leech Lake River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Pine River, South Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/upper-mississippi-hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-recalibration-and-extension,,,,
31196,"Upper St Croix, Snake and Kettle Rivers Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) Modeling - Phase 2",2016,79972,,,,,,,,,,,0.24,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to calibrate, and validate three watershed models using the Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) model. The contractor will produce HSPF watershed models that can be further developed to provide information to support conventional parameter TMDLs. The contractor will clearly demonstrate that the models generate predicted output timeseries for hydrology, sediment, nutrients, and dissolved oxygen which are consistent with available sets of observed data.",,"Upper St. Croix River WatershedKettle River Watershed",2015-09-14,2016-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Christopher,Klucas,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2498",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Aitkin, Carlton, Itasca, Kanabec, Mille Lacs, Pine",,"Kettle River, Snake River, Upper St. Croix River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/upper-st-croix-snake-and-kettle-rivers-hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-modelin,,,,
34298,"Vermilion Community College Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network Sampling Program",2016,158108,,,,,,,,,,,0.46,"Vermillion Community College","Public College/University","2016: Five locations will be monitored in support of the combined Vermilion Community College and Rainy River Community College 2016 – 2017 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling Agreement. Water samples, field measurements, field images, and other observations will be obtained at each location during each sampling event. Up to 35 samples will be collected at the Vermilion near Crane Lake site and up to 25 samples at the Vermilion River at Buyck, Nemadji River, Little Fork River and Sturgeon River will be collected each year at each site. 2021 and 2024: The primary objective of this project is to obtain spatial and long-term pollutant load information from Minnesota’s rivers and streams, in particular, the Kawishiwi and Stony Rivers in NE MN. To accomplish this, staff at the Vermilion Community College (VCC) will assist the MPCA with water quality monitoring and annual pollutant loading calculations. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-15,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,O'Niell,Tedrow,"Vermillion Community College","1900 East Camp Street ",Ely,MN,55731,"(218) 235-2125",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Carlton, St. Louis",,"Little Fork River, Nemadji River, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/vermillion-community-college-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-sampling-program,,,,
34298,"Vermilion Community College Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network Sampling Program",2021,15503,,,,,,,,,,,.1,"Vermillion Community College","Public College/University","2016: Five locations will be monitored in support of the combined Vermilion Community College and Rainy River Community College 2016 – 2017 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling Agreement. Water samples, field measurements, field images, and other observations will be obtained at each location during each sampling event. Up to 35 samples will be collected at the Vermilion near Crane Lake site and up to 25 samples at the Vermilion River at Buyck, Nemadji River, Little Fork River and Sturgeon River will be collected each year at each site. 2021 and 2024: The primary objective of this project is to obtain spatial and long-term pollutant load information from Minnesota’s rivers and streams, in particular, the Kawishiwi and Stony Rivers in NE MN. To accomplish this, staff at the Vermilion Community College (VCC) will assist the MPCA with water quality monitoring and annual pollutant loading calculations. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-15,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,O'Niell,Tedrow,"Vermillion Community College","1900 East Camp Street ",Ely,MN,55731,"(218) 235-2125",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Carlton, St. Louis",,"Little Fork River, Nemadji River, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/vermillion-community-college-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-sampling-program,,,,
34298,"Vermilion Community College Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network Sampling Program",2022,30706,,,,,,,,,,,.1,"Vermillion Community College","Public College/University","2016: Five locations will be monitored in support of the combined Vermilion Community College and Rainy River Community College 2016 – 2017 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling Agreement. Water samples, field measurements, field images, and other observations will be obtained at each location during each sampling event. Up to 35 samples will be collected at the Vermilion near Crane Lake site and up to 25 samples at the Vermilion River at Buyck, Nemadji River, Little Fork River and Sturgeon River will be collected each year at each site. 2021 and 2024: The primary objective of this project is to obtain spatial and long-term pollutant load information from Minnesota’s rivers and streams, in particular, the Kawishiwi and Stony Rivers in NE MN. To accomplish this, staff at the Vermilion Community College (VCC) will assist the MPCA with water quality monitoring and annual pollutant loading calculations. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-15,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,O'Niell,Tedrow,"Vermillion Community College","1900 East Camp Street ",Ely,MN,55731,"(218) 235-2125",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Carlton, St. Louis",,"Little Fork River, Nemadji River, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/vermillion-community-college-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-sampling-program,,,,
34298,"Vermilion Community College Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network Sampling Program",2024,36290,,,,,,,,,,,.10,"Vermillion Community College","Public College/University","2016: Five locations will be monitored in support of the combined Vermilion Community College and Rainy River Community College 2016 – 2017 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN) Sampling Agreement. Water samples, field measurements, field images, and other observations will be obtained at each location during each sampling event. Up to 35 samples will be collected at the Vermilion near Crane Lake site and up to 25 samples at the Vermilion River at Buyck, Nemadji River, Little Fork River and Sturgeon River will be collected each year at each site. 2021 and 2024: The primary objective of this project is to obtain spatial and long-term pollutant load information from Minnesota’s rivers and streams, in particular, the Kawishiwi and Stony Rivers in NE MN. To accomplish this, staff at the Vermilion Community College (VCC) will assist the MPCA with water quality monitoring and annual pollutant loading calculations. ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-15,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,O'Niell,Tedrow,"Vermillion Community College","1900 East Camp Street ",Ely,MN,55731,"(218) 235-2125",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Carlton, St. Louis",,"Little Fork River, Nemadji River, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/vermillion-community-college-watershed-pollutant-load-monitoring-network-sampling-program,,,,
34243,"Warroad River Inchannel Sedimentation Analysis",2016,73718,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Estimated annual nutrient reductions from the project include 461 pounds of Nitrogen, 120 pounds of Phosphorous, and a substantial reduction of fecal coliform bacteria.","Information and data gathered as a result of this grant is being used to build a targeted implementation plan to address water quality and sediment issues in the Warroad River.","Achieved proposed outcomes",66134,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",264535,276,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",,"Warroad WD","Local/Regional Government","Lake of the Woods (LOW) is a resource with local, regional, state, and international significance and is the second largest lake in Minnesota. Over the past three decades the Warroad River Harbor in LOW has experienced severe sedimentation problems. The sedimentation has led to frequent dredging to remove excess sediment and protect this vital resource. However, it is unsustainable to continue dredging the harbor without also addressing the sources of upstream sediment within the Warroad River watershed. As such, there is a significant need to quantify the sources of sediment and to target specific upstream sediment management practices to address the sediment issues. The proposed project will analyze the in-channel sediment budget of the Warroad River and how it affects the Warroad River harbor area (Reach of Interest (ROI)). The results of this project will supplement the recently completed Sediment Source Assessment Report of the Warroad River (HEI, 2013) which quantified sediment source contribution from overland sources. This project will also build upon work to target projects with measurable benefits to LOW done as part of the LOW Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS). The outcome of this project will be information and data products that can be used to build a targeted implementation plan to address sediment issues in the Warroad River, ultimately resulting in reduced sedimentation within Warroad Harbor and improved water quality within LOW.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Scott,Johnson,"Warroad WD","502 - 7th St SW, Ste 8",Roseau,MN,56751,763-473-4643,scott.johnson2@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Lake of the Woods, Roseau",,"Lake of the Woods",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/warroad-river-inchannel-sedimentation-analysis,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
10008281,"Water Resources Center Watershed Monitoring Network",2016,274204,,,,,,,,,,,2.82,"Water Resources Center","Local/Regional Government","This project will collect water samples at seventeen monitoring locations ranging in size from 23,173 acres (7 Mile Creek) to over 9 million acres (Minnesota River at St. Peter) as a part of the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN). The Minnesota State University - Water Resources Center (WRC) has been directly involved with the program and is familiar with the streams and hydrology of the region. In addition to monitoring, the WRC will review, manage and submit the data in formats provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Load calculations will also be computed and submitted to the MPCA annually. The WRC will coordinate and manage the monitoring program ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kimberly,Musser,"Water Resources Center","135 Trafton Science Center South",Mankato,MN,56001,"(507) 389-5307",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Blue Earth, Faribault, Nicollet, Watonwan",,"Blue Earth River, Le Sueur River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Watonwan River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-resources-center-watershed-monitoring-network,,,,
10008281,"Water Resources Center Watershed Monitoring Network",2018,152059,,,,,,,,,,,1.41,"Water Resources Center","Local/Regional Government","This project will collect water samples at seventeen monitoring locations ranging in size from 23,173 acres (7 Mile Creek) to over 9 million acres (Minnesota River at St. Peter) as a part of the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN). The Minnesota State University - Water Resources Center (WRC) has been directly involved with the program and is familiar with the streams and hydrology of the region. In addition to monitoring, the WRC will review, manage and submit the data in formats provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Load calculations will also be computed and submitted to the MPCA annually. The WRC will coordinate and manage the monitoring program ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kimberly,Musser,"Water Resources Center","135 Trafton Science Center South",Mankato,MN,56001,"(507) 389-5307",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Blue Earth, Faribault, Nicollet, Watonwan",,"Blue Earth River, Le Sueur River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Watonwan River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-resources-center-watershed-monitoring-network,,,,
10008281,"Water Resources Center Watershed Monitoring Network",2019,106168,,,,,,,,,,,1.41,"Water Resources Center","Local/Regional Government","This project will collect water samples at seventeen monitoring locations ranging in size from 23,173 acres (7 Mile Creek) to over 9 million acres (Minnesota River at St. Peter) as a part of the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN). The Minnesota State University - Water Resources Center (WRC) has been directly involved with the program and is familiar with the streams and hydrology of the region. In addition to monitoring, the WRC will review, manage and submit the data in formats provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Load calculations will also be computed and submitted to the MPCA annually. The WRC will coordinate and manage the monitoring program ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kimberly,Musser,"Water Resources Center","135 Trafton Science Center South",Mankato,MN,56001,"(507) 389-5307",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Blue Earth, Faribault, Nicollet, Watonwan",,"Blue Earth River, Le Sueur River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Watonwan River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-resources-center-watershed-monitoring-network,,,,
10008281,"Water Resources Center Watershed Monitoring Network",2021,196744,,,,,,,,,,,.96,"Water Resources Center","Local/Regional Government","This project will collect water samples at seventeen monitoring locations ranging in size from 23,173 acres (7 Mile Creek) to over 9 million acres (Minnesota River at St. Peter) as a part of the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN). The Minnesota State University - Water Resources Center (WRC) has been directly involved with the program and is familiar with the streams and hydrology of the region. In addition to monitoring, the WRC will review, manage and submit the data in formats provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Load calculations will also be computed and submitted to the MPCA annually. The WRC will coordinate and manage the monitoring program ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kimberly,Musser,"Water Resources Center","135 Trafton Science Center South",Mankato,MN,56001,"(507) 389-5307",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Blue Earth, Faribault, Nicollet, Watonwan",,"Blue Earth River, Le Sueur River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Watonwan River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-resources-center-watershed-monitoring-network,,,,
10008281,"Water Resources Center Watershed Monitoring Network",2022,244332,,,,,,,,,,,1.07,"Water Resources Center","Local/Regional Government","This project will collect water samples at seventeen monitoring locations ranging in size from 23,173 acres (7 Mile Creek) to over 9 million acres (Minnesota River at St. Peter) as a part of the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN). The Minnesota State University - Water Resources Center (WRC) has been directly involved with the program and is familiar with the streams and hydrology of the region. In addition to monitoring, the WRC will review, manage and submit the data in formats provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Load calculations will also be computed and submitted to the MPCA annually. The WRC will coordinate and manage the monitoring program ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kimberly,Musser,"Water Resources Center","135 Trafton Science Center South",Mankato,MN,56001,"(507) 389-5307",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Blue Earth, Faribault, Nicollet, Watonwan",,"Blue Earth River, Le Sueur River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Watonwan River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-resources-center-watershed-monitoring-network,,,,
10008281,"Water Resources Center Watershed Monitoring Network",2024,241188,,,,,,,,,,,1.81,"Water Resources Center","Local/Regional Government","This project will collect water samples at seventeen monitoring locations ranging in size from 23,173 acres (7 Mile Creek) to over 9 million acres (Minnesota River at St. Peter) as a part of the Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network (WPLMN). The Minnesota State University - Water Resources Center (WRC) has been directly involved with the program and is familiar with the streams and hydrology of the region. In addition to monitoring, the WRC will review, manage and submit the data in formats provided by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Load calculations will also be computed and submitted to the MPCA annually. The WRC will coordinate and manage the monitoring program ",,"Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network ",2016-01-15,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kimberly,Musser,"Water Resources Center","135 Trafton Science Center South",Mankato,MN,56001,"(507) 389-5307",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Blue Earth, Faribault, Nicollet, Watonwan",,"Blue Earth River, Le Sueur River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Watonwan River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-resources-center-watershed-monitoring-network,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2024,1125000,"M.L. 2023, Chapter 40, Art. 2, Sec. 8, Subd. (a) These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2024: M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Updated Groundwater Modeling for Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Pilot Project, $112,265 spent in FY2024 (Barr) Phase 2: A Community-Centered Framework of the Value of Water in the Twin Cities, $21,204 spent in FY2024 (University of Minnesota - Water Resources Center) Projects continuing this year: Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $105,960 spent in FY2024 (Minnesota Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $126,248 spent in FY2024 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Water Supply Planning Atlas for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Development (Metropolitan Council) ",,,,593505,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff",0.6,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2023,919000,"M.L. 2021 1st Special session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec 2. Subd. 2 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2023: M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9 M.L. 2017, Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Water Supply Planning Atlas for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Outreach and Engagement, $27,481 spent in FY2023 (EOR) White Paper: Water Availability, Access, and Use, $25,552 spent in FY2023 (EOR) Subregional Engagement to Update the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Projects continuing this year: Water Supply Planning Atlas for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Development (Metropolitan Council) Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $116,460 spent in FY2023  (Minnesota Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $126,248 spent in FY2023  (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Water Supply Planning Atlas for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Outreach and Engagement, $27,481 spent in FY2023 (EOR) Phase 1: A Community-Centered Framework of the Value of Water in the Twin Cities, $13,680 spent in FY2023 (U of MN - Water Resources Center) ",,,,650661,,"Barber, Cameron, Carter, Cederberg, Chamblis, Cummings, Dolkar, Johnson, Lee, Lilligren, Lindstrom, Morales, Osman, Pacheco, Vento, Wulff, Zelle, Zeran",2.5,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2022,919000,"M.L. 2021 1st Special session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec 2. Subd. 2 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2022: M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9 M.L. 2017 Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Water Supply Planning Atlas for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Development (Metropolitan Council) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan, $562 spent in FY2022 (HDR and Metropolitan Council) Water Conservation Advisor Training Program, $27,000 spent in FY2022 (Freshwater Society) Interactions of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources, $14,736 spent in FY2022 (HDR) Phase 1: A Community-Centered Framework of the Value of Water in the Twin Cities, $13,680 spent in FY2022 (U of MN - Water Resources Center) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $106,350 spent in FY2022 (Minnesota Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $166,029 spent in FY2022 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) ",,,"Met Council contributed an additional $31,869 to expand work ",846839,,,3.3,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2021,1000000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2021: M.L. 2017 Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Phase 1: A Community-Centered Framework of the Value of Water in the Twin Cities, $27,360 spent in FY2021 (U of MN - Water Resources Center) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan, $7,996 spent in FY2021 (HDR and Metropolitan Council) Water Conservation Advisor Training Program, $27,000 spent in FY2021 (Freshwater Society) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $110,925 spent in FY2021 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $134,467 spent in FY2021 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Twin Cities Metro Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model Application - Climate Scenarios, $46,269 spent in FY2021 (Barr) Municipal Water Supply Data Reporting in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Background and Discovery, $8,305 spent in FY2021 (CDM Smith) Interactions of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources, $5,164 spent in FY2021 (HDR) ",,,,1024547,,,4,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2020,1000000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2020: M.L. 2017 Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Twin Cities Metro Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model Application - Climate Scenarios, $941 spent in FY2020 (Barr) Drinking Water Protection Guidance Project - Phase 1, $54,752 spent in FY2020 (Stantec) - completed in FY2020 Northwest Metro Area Regional Water Supply System Study - Phase 1, $9,402 spent in FY2020 (SEH) - completed in FY2020 Municipal Water Supply Data Reporting in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Background and Discovery, $40,235 spent in FY2020 (CDM Smith) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Interactions of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources, $17,959 spent in FY2020 (HDR) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $92,475 spent in FY2020 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $74,880 spent in FY2020 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Water Conservation and Efficiency Assessment Tool, $5,578 spent in FY2020 (HDR) ",,181000,"Metropolitan Council contributed $181,000 to continue work identified in Phase 1 of the Northwest Metro Area Regional Water Supply System Study. ",711740,,,2.8,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2019,950000,"M.L. 2017 Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2019: M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Water Conservation Advisor Training Program - Development and Pilot, $111,500 spent in FY2019 (Freshwater Society) - completed in FY2019 Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $93,050 spent in FY2019 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $99,840 spent in FY2019 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Water Conservation and Efficiency Assessment Tool, $4,864 spent in FY2019 (HDR) Interactions of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources, $104,845 spent in FY2019 (HDR) Projects completed this year: Water Efficiency Impacts on Future Water Supply Infrastructure, $23,215 spent in FY2019 (CDM Smith) ",,,,844272,,,3,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2018,950000,"M.L. 2017 Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2018: M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2014 Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 5 M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Twin Cities Metro Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model Application - Transient Model Update, $26,377 (Barr) - completed in FY2018 Washington County Municipal Water Coalition Water Efficiency Study, $22,099 spent in FY2018 (SEH) - completed in FY2018 Water Conservation and Efficiency Assessment Tool, $23,726 spent in FY2018 (HDR) Water Efficiency Impacts on Future Water Supply Infrastructure, $58,403 spent in FY2018 (CDM Smith) Interactions of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources, $17,677 spent in FY2018 (HDR) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $83,700 spent in FY2018 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $55,608 spent in FY2018 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Stakeholder Engagement in the North and East Metro, $29,957 spent in FY2018 (Grassroots Solutions) ",,,,635627,,,2.8,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2017,975000,"M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2017: M.L. 2014 Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 5 M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2011 (Special Session) Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Water Rates Database and Tool Development, $113,014 (CDM Smith) - completed in FY2017 Stakeholder Engagement in the North and East Metro, $7,543 spent in FY2017 (Grassroots Solutions) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $103,500 spent in FY2017 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $61,296 spent in FY2017 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Characterizing Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction in Northeast Metro Area Lakes, MN, $2,698+$29,427 spent in FY2017 (U.S. Geological Survey, Barr) Washington County Feasibility Assessment, $23,414 spent in FY2017 (SEH) Regional Feasibility of Alternative Approaches to Water Sustainability, $54,784 spent in FY2017 (HDR) ",,,,627657,,,2,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2016,975000,"M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2016: M.L. 2014 Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 5 M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Report to Minnesota State Legislature: Concept Cost Report for Augmentation of White Bear Lake with Surface Water, $123,797 spent in FY2016 (SEH, HDR, Wenck Associates Inc., and Zan Associates) - completed in FY2016 Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $30,648 spent in FY2016 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Washington County Feasibility Assessment, $99,767 spent in FY2016 (SEH) Characterizing Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction in Northeast Metro Area Lakes, MN, $247,604 spent in FY2016 (U.S. Geological Survey) Regional Feasibility of Alternative Approaches to Water Sustainability, $95,060 spent in FY2016 (HDR) Projects completed this year: Feasibility Study of Joint Water Utility Cities of Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbus, Hugo, Lexington and Lino Lakes, $11,831 spent in FY2016 (Barr) Regional Groundwater Modeling: Metro Pumping Optimization, $1,905 spent in FY2016 (Barr) Stormwater Reuse Demonstration Project - CHS Stadium, $100,000 spent in FY2016 (City of St. Paul) Water Billing and Rates Analysis, $4,990 spent in FY2016 (CDM Smith) Industrial Water Conservation in the North and East Groundwater Management Area, $16,870 spent in FY2016 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) ",,,,979281,,,1.8,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2015,550000,"M.L. 2014 Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 5 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2015: M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2011 (Special Session) Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Washington County Feasibility Assessment, $21,932 spent in FY2015 (SEH) Characterizing Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction in Northeast Metro Area Lakes, MN., $252,970 spent in FY2015 (U.S. Geological Survey) Stormwater Reuse Demonstration Project - CHS Stadium, $92,629 spent in FY2015 (Pioneer Power Inc., Barr) Regional Groundwater Modeling: Metro Pumping Optimization, $47,487 spent in FY2015 (Barr) Industrial Water Conservation in the North and East Groundwater Management Area, $33,130 spent in FY2015 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $15,650 spent in FY2015 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Water Billing and Rates Analysis, $50,005 spent in FY2015 (CDM Smith) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) Feasibility Study of Joint Water Utility Cities of Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbus, Hugo, Lexington and Lino Lakes, $44,493 spent in FY2015 (Barr) Regional Feasibility of Alternative Approaches to Water Sustainability, $403,182 spent in FY2015 (HDR) Projects completed this year: Feasibility Assessment of Approaches to Water Sustainability in the Northeast Metro, $193,803 spent in FY2015 (SEH) Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model (Metro Model 2), $5,662 spent in FY2015 (Barr) Water Conservation Toolbox, $42,006 spent in FY2015 (CDM Smith) ",,,,1575818,,,2.7,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2014,1537000,"M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2014: M.L. 2011 (Special Session) Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Feasibility Study of Joint Water Utility Cities of Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbus, Hugo, Lexington and Lino Lakes, $5,429 spent in FY2014 (Barr) Regional Feasibility of Alternative Approaches to Water Sustainability, $23,304 spent in FY2014 (HDR) Water Conservation Toolbox, $54,694 spent in FY2014 (CDM Smith) Feasibility Assessment of Approaches to Water Sustainability in the Northeast Metro, $34,544+$110,459 spent in FY2014 (SEH) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model (Metro Model 2), $66,495 spent in FY2014 (Barr) Projects completed this year: Assessing the Opportunity and Barriers for Water Conservation by Private Industrial Users, $45,337 spent in FY2014 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Final report on Met Council website Impacts on Groundwater Quality by Stormwater Practices, $66,562 spent in FY2014 (U of MN - St. Anthony Falls Laboratory) ",,,,704466,,,2.8,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2013,500000,"M.L. 2011 (Special Session) Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 9",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Impacts on Groundwater Quality by Stormwater Practices, $66,562 spent in FY2013 (U of MN - St. Anthony Falls Laboratory) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) Assessing the Opportunity and Barriers for Water Conservation by Private Industrial Users, $36,453 spent in SFY2013 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model (Metro Model 2), $135,416 spent in FY2013 (Barr) Projects completed this year: Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Recharge Model, $73,308 spent in FY2013 (Barr) ",,,,491312,,,1.7,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2012,500000,"M.L. 2011 (Special Session) Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 9 This appropriation has also supported the projects done in FY2012: M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Assessing the Opportunity and Barriers for Water Conservation by Private Industrial Users, $11,243 spent in FY2012 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model (Metro Model 2), $20,789 spent in FY2012 (Barr) Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Recharge Model, $16,549 spent in FY2012 (Barr) Projects continued this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) Projects completed this year: Feasibility Assessment & Guidance for Stormwater Reuse, $65,773 spent in FY2012 (CDM Smith) South Washington County Water Supply Planning (Metropolitan Council) Feasibility Assessment & Guidance for Stormwater Reuse, $65,773 spent in FY2012 (CDM Smith) Mapping the Vulnerability of Glacial Aquifers & Mapping Contaminant Plumes, $27,850 in FY2012 (U of MN - MN Geological Survey) South Washington County Water Supply Planning (Metropolitan Council) ",,,,212673,,,1.8,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2011,400000,"M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 This appropriation has also supported the projects done in FY2011: M.L. 2009, Chp. 172 Art. 2, Sec. 10 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Feasibility Assessment & Guidance for Stormwater Reuse, $21,695 spent in FY2011 (CDM Smith) Mapping the Vulnerability of Glacial Aquifers & Mapping Contaminant Plumes, $23,181 in FY2011 (U of MN - MN Geological Survey) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) South Washington County Water Supply Planning (Metropolitan Council) South Washington County Water Supply Planning (Metropolitan Council) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Projects completed this year: Assessment of East Bethel Water Availability (Groundwater Modeling), $44,536 spent in FY2011 (Barr) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Water Conservation, $36,754 spent in SFY2011 (Environmental Financing Group Inc.) Evaluation of Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction, $31,754 spent in FY2011 (Barr) Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Chemistry Assessment, $48,138 spent in FY2011 (U of MN - MN Geological Survey) ",,,,355552,,,1.1,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2010,400000,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172 Art. 2, Sec. 10",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Assessment of East Bethel Water Availability (Groundwater Modeling), $26,593 spent in SFY2010 (Barr) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Water Conservation, $11,785 spent in SFY2010 (Environmental Financing Group Inc.) Evaluation of Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction, $35,246 spent in FY2010 (Barr) Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Chemistry Assessment, $18,226 spent in FY2010 (U of MN - MN Geological Survey) Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) ",,,,246702,,,1.5,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,,
33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2024,750000,"M.L. 2023, Chapter 40, Art. 2, Sec. 8, Subd. (b)","$750,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage municipalities in the metropolitan area to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","The goal of the water efficiency grant program is to support technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Grants can be used for rebates to residents and commercial properties that replace inefficient water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water, or for irrigation system audits. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Communities used grant funds to lower the cost of resident purchase and installation of products that reduce water use, such as EPA WaterSense labeled low-flow toilets, Energy Star labeled washing machines, and WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers, WaterSense labeled irrigation spray sprinkler bodies, and WaterSense Partner-certified irrigation system audits. Thirty-seven communities participated in the 2022-2024 grant program. Grant recipients and award amounts included: Apple Valley $35,000, Bayport $8,000, Bloomington $25,000, Brooklyn Park $11,000, Chanhassen $34,440, Circle Pines $9,600, Coon Rapids $26,000, Cottage Grove $43,000, Eagan $42,000, Eden Prairie $44,000, Farmington $11,000, Forest Lake $26,000, Fridley $10,000, Hugo $36,000, Lake Elmo $43,000, Lakeville $43,000, Lino Lakes $24,000, Maple Grove $45,000, Minnetonka $22,000, New Brighton $28,000, North St. Paul $22,000, Plymouth $35,000, Prior Lake $9,600, Ramsey $19,800, Robbinsdale $6,080, Rosemount $34,000, Roseville $12,000, Savage $30,000, Shakopee Public Utilities Commission $49,000, Shoreview $16,000, Shorewood $8,400, St. Louis Park $25,000, Stillwater $25,000, Victoria $39,000, White Bear Lake $23,000, White Bear Township $38,000, Woodbury $40,000. Additionally, provided $150,000 in grant money to Saint Paul Regional Water Services to install seven advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) collectors in designated areas of concentrated poverty in Saint Paul. From 7/1/2023 through 6/30/2024:  3,654 devices were replaced 1,214 toilets 701 irrigation controllers 290 irrigation spray sprinkler bodies 911 clothes washers 538 dishwashers 29 irrigation system audits From estimated water savings provided by grantees, approximately 34,655,455 gallons will be saved each year by these grant activities.  ",,100430,"20% local match ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",,
33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2023,625000,"M.L. 2021, 1st Special Session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 8, Subd. (b)","$625,000 the first year and $625,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage municipalities in the metropolitan area to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","The goal of the water efficiency grant program is to support technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Grants can be used for rebates to residents and commercial properties that replace inefficient water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water, or for irrigation system audits. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Communities used grant funds to lower the cost of resident purchase and installation of products that reduce water use, such as EPA WaterSense labeled low-flow toilets, Energy Star labeled washing machines, and WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers, WaterSense labeled irrigation spray sprinkler bodies, and WaterSense Partner-certified irrigation system audits. Thirty-seven communities participated in the 2022-2024 grant program.  Grant recipients and amounts included: Apple Valley $35,000, Bayport $8,000, Bloomington $25,000, Brooklyn Park $11,000, Chanhassen $34,440, Circle Pines $9,600, Coon Rapids $26,000, Cottage Grove $43,000, Eagan $42,000, Eden Prairie $44,000, Farmington $11,000, Forest Lake $26,000, Fridley $10,000, Hugo $36,000, Lake Elmo $43,000, Lakeville $43,000, Lino Lakes $24,000, Maple Grove $45,000, Minnetonka $22,000, New Brighton $28,000, North St. Paul $22,000, Plymouth $35,000, Prior Lake $9,600, Ramsey $19,800, Robbinsdale $6,080, Rosemount $34,000, Roseville $12,000, Savage $30,000, Shakopee Public Utilities Commission $49,000, Shoreview $16,000, Shorewood $8,400, St. Louis Park $25,000, Stillwater $25,000, Victoria $39,000, White Bear Lake $23,000, White Bear Township $38,000, Woodbury $40,000. From 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 3336 devices were replaced 1149  toilets 1038 irrigation controllers 95 irrigation spray sprinkler bodies 567 clothes washers 487 dishwashers 113  irrigation system audits From estimated water savings provided by grantees, approximately 39,629,421 gallons will be saved each year by these grant activities ",,108491,"20% Local match. ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",,
33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2022,625000,"M.L. 2021, 1st Special Session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 8, Subd. (b)","$625,000 the first year and $625,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage municipalities in the metropolitan area to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","The goal of the water efficiency grant program is to support technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Grants can be used for rebates to residents and commercial properties that replace inefficient water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water, or for irrigation system audits. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Communities used grant funds to lower the cost of resident purchase and installation of products that reduce water use, such as EPA WaterSense labeled low-flow toilets, Energy Star labeled washing machines, and WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers, WaterSense labeled irrigation spray sprinkler bodies, and WaterSense Partner-certified irrigation system audits. From 7/1/2021-6/30/2022 2590 devices were replaced 1020 toilets 720 irrigation controllers 405 irrigation spray sprinkler bodies 445 clothes washers 15 irrigation system audits From estimated water savings provided by grantees, approximately 29,597,009 gallons will be saved each year by these grant activities ",,85583,"25% Local match ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",,
33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2021,375000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9, Subd. (b)","$375,000 the first year and $375,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage municipalities in the metropolitan area to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","The goal of the water efficiency grant program is to support technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Grants can be used for rebates to residents and commercial properties that replace inefficient water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water, or for irrigation system audits. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Communities used grant funds to lower the cost of resident purchase and installation of products that reduce water use, such as EPA WaterSense labeled low-flow toilets, Energy Star labeled washing machines, and WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers, WaterSense labeled irrigation spray sprinkler bodies, and WaterSense Partner-certified irrigation system audits. Thirty-seven communities participated in the 2019-2022 program.  Grant recipients and amounts included: Apple Valley $29,000, Bloomington $21,000, Brooklyn Center $8,000, Brooklyn Park $10,300, Chanhassen $19,300, Chaska $14,000, Cottage Grove $27,300, Dayton $2,000, Eagan $30,300, Eden Prairie $44,300, Farmington $10,543.40, Forest Lake $12,300, Fridley $24,300, Hopkins $19,000, Hugo $31,300, Lake Elmo $35,000, Lakeville $36,000, Mahtomedi $6,300, Minnetonka $20,000, New Brighton $18,300, North St. Paul $23,000, Oakdale $1,315.63, Plymouth $33,300, Prior Lake $8,000, Ramsey $28,000, Robbinsdale $8,000, Rosemount $11,300, Roseville $10,000, Savage $11,000, Shakopee Public Utilities Commission $23,300, Shoreview $23,000, Shorewood $19,000, St. Louis Park $23,000, Victoria $12,300, White Bear Lake $34,300, White Bear Township $44,300, Woodbury $50,300. 4,416 devices were replaced 1,348 toilets 2,091 irrigation controllers 26 irrigation spray sprinkler bodies 915 clothes washers 36 irrigation system audits  From estimated water savings provided by grantees, approximately 92,500,000 gallons per year will be saved each year by these replacements.  ",,83506,"25% Local match ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",,
33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2020,375000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9, Subd. (b)","$375,000 the first year and $375,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage municipalities in the metropolitan area to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","The goal of the water efficiency grant program is to work with municipal water suppliers to help increase water efficiency in their communities. Grants can be used for rebates to residents and commercial properties that replace inefficient water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water, or for irrigation system audits. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Outcomes (cost savings, water savings, and device replacements) were reported at the end of the project. ",,41534,"25% Local match. Other Funds Leveraged for FY 2020 only includes local match from Q1 and Q2 of 2020. ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",,
33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2017,250000,"M.L. 2015, Chapter 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9, Subd. (b)","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage implementation of water demand reduction measures by municipalities in the metropolitan area to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","A pilot program for water efficiency was established with the goal of supporting technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Qualified activities include replacement of toilet with EPA WaterSense certified high-efficiency toilets, residential clothes washing machine replacements with Energy Star certified washing machines, irrigation system audits by EPA WaterSense certified professionals, and irrigation controller replacements with EPA WaterSense certified replacements. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Communities used grant funds to lower the cost of resident purchase and installation of products that reduce water use, such as EPA WaterSense labeled low-flow toilets, Energy Star labeled washing machines, and WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers, and WaterSense Partner-certified irrigation system audits. Nineteen communities participated in this 2015-2017 program. Grant recipients and amounts included: Brooklyn Park $7,500, Chanhassen $37,500, Circle Pines $15,000, Cottage Grove $8,250, Eagan $50,000, Eden Prairie $37,500, Forest Lake $40,000, Fridley $30,000, Hugo $36,000, Mahtomedi $10,000, New Brighton $50,000, Newport $27,000, Plymouth $18,750, Rosemount $9,000, Shakopee $50,000, Victoria $9,000, White Bear Lake $49,125, White Bear Township $24,000, Woodbury $50,000. 4,514 devices were replaced 2,380 toilets 1,190 irrigation controllers 940 clothes washers 4 irrigation system audits From estimated water savings provided by grantees, approximately 52,000,000 gallons per year will be saved each year by these replacements.  ",,205742,"25% Local match plus additional funds ($155,125 across FY 2016 and FY 2017). Grant awards in excess of the appropriated $500,000 were funded by Clean Water Funds. ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",,
33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2016,250000,"M.L. 2015, Chapter 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9, Subd. (b)","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage implementation of water demand reduction measures by municipalities in the metropolitan area to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","A pilot program for water efficiency was established with the goal of supporting technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Qualified activities include replacement of toilet with EPA WaterSense certified high-efficiency toilets, residential clothes washing machine replacements with Energy Star certified washing machines, irrigation system audits by EPA WaterSense certified professionals, and irrigation controller replacements with EPA WaterSense certified replacements. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Outcomes (cost savings, water savings, and device replacements) were reported at the end of the project. ",,103477,"25% Local match plus additional funds ($155,125 across FY 2016 and FY 2017). Grant awards in excess of the appropriated $500,000 were funded by Clean Water Funds. ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2024,,,,"In FY24, the DNR has sunset its CWF watershed modeling activities. Instead, program staff will primarily be focusing on the culvert replacement incentive program funded by the CWF. The Cascade Creek hydrology study will be completed under the nonpoint technical assistance program. Outcomes from this effort will be reported in that section of the report. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2023,,,,"In FY23 DNR will complete the water storage sensitivity analysis for cover crops using at least two existing watershed models. The goal is to provide local watershed planning groups with a simple approach to estimate water storage benefits from different levels of cover crop adoption. The DNR is also initiating a second effort to provide guidance on water storage benefits that looks at the benefits of channel restoration and reconnecting them to their floodplains. ","The DNR initiated a study on the Cascade Creek restoration project with the aim to quantify the hydrologic benefit of providing water storage through channel restoration and reconnecting floodplains. DNR completed modeling analysis of water storage benefits of cover crops and presented this work at the Minnesota Water Resources Conference as well as at several other internal and external venues. Data from the watershed modeling effort was provided to the USACE Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), to incorporate into their research efforts. ",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2022,,,,"Program priorities in FY22 include technical support for geomorphic design of stream crossings and expanded analysis and dissemination of the results from the evaluation of hydrologic change. Specific projects for this geomorphic design of stream crossings will include Dry Creek and Gorman Creek. DNR will continue to develop methods and tools to improve efficiency of the analysis and design process. We will also seek additional opportunities to enhance and expand this effort by collaborating with other agencies and organizations. DNR will also assist with the ongoing statewide analysis of hydrologic change including the synthesis of results into statewide maps depicting patterns in climate and stream flow. Help develop watershed hydrology report cards to improve the communication of these results to local partners and other state agencies involved in watershed planning efforts. ","The DNR was expanded upon previous watershed modeling efforts. Modeling for the Dobbins Creek Watershed was completed in the previous year to help Mower County SWCD quantify the benefits of their best management practices. This year, the results from this were incorporated into a document and presented as a case study for a two-day hydrology workshop. In addition, program staff initiated a new effort to use existing models to conduct a sensitivity analysis on the water storage benefits of cover crops. When complete, this work will be useful a useful guide for local watershed when developing the water storage strategy required as part of One Watershed One Plan. ",,,,72509,6760,,0.5,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2021,165000,,,"In FY21 program staff will continue efforts to expand modeling capabilities. One area of interest is exploring options for incorporating downscaled climate model results into GSSHA to simulate climate change impacts. Staff are participating in the project funded by the Water Research Foundation to look at innovative approaches for flood mitigation planning and under extreme wet weather events. We will also continue to engage with watershed modelers at the University of Minnesota to improve our processes. This will include exploring the applications of machine learning to predict watershed hydrological changes under the impacts of climate and land use changes. Clean Water modeling applications for FY 21 include completing the analysis of Dobbins Creek watershed and a report evaluating best management practices and a second report evaluating impact of agricultural drainage tile. We also anticipate using the model develop the Dry Creek (Olmsted County) to study land-use scenarios climate change and effects of various stressors on floodplain and channel connectivity. Finally staff will continue to provide technical support for the evaluation of hydrologic change analysis for the remaining gaged watersheds and assist with report.","DNR watershed modeling staff completed a report for Dobbins Creek watershed on the effectiveness of BMPs to address water quality and flooding issues. A separate report was completed that analyzed the effect of drain tiles and cover crops. Results from these reports were shared with state and local partners through presentations and factsheets. DNR provided technical support for stream channel stability and geomorphic design for potential culvert replacement projects. This program promotes a natural design approach for stream crossings to reduce flooding and erosion as well as improve fish passage. As part of this effort DNR developed a model for Dry Creek to assess hydrology and sediment transport. DNR is involved in several other potential stream crossing design projects throughout southern and central Minnesota. DNR also continued to play a key role in implementing a standardized approach for evaluating altered stream hydrology. The evaluation of hydrologic change was completed for 63 stream gages across Minnesota. DNR is using this information to develop plain language communications aimed at participants in local watershed planning efforts.",,,,131364,6473,,0.8,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2020,170000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY20 DNR watershed modelers will: -Continuing to work with the Minnesota Supercomputer Institute to adapt GSSHA for the supercomputer in order to increase modeling program capacity. -Explore potential collaboration with the University of Minnesota using machine learning to improve watershed modeling and management. -Run additional scenarios for Shakopee Creek tributary model. -Run drain tile scenario and additional land use scenario for Shakopee Creek parent model. -Finish calibration and validation of Huse Creek model. -Develop and run model scenarios for Dobbins Creek to assess effectiveness of proposed management activities on reducing peak flow. -Help finalize the methods guidance document for altered hydrology tools and assist with staff training on procedures. ","Clean Water modeling program staff continued to explore avenues for expanding modeling capacity. Staff participated in a symposium hosted by the University of Minnesota focused on using machine learning to improve watershed modeling and management. Program staff extended existing modeling applications for Dobbins Creek GSSHA (Mower County) model to analyze water quality and flooding issues. Staff developed and ran model scenarios to assess effectiveness of proposed management activities on reducing peak flow. Additional scenarios were run to evaluate the impact of agricultural drainage tiles and perennial cover on hydrology. Program staff also played a key role in developing a comprehensive standardized approach to evaluate altered hydrology for streams. Staff provided technical support for method development developed programming scripts to automate the analysis assisted with training and helped write the documentation. In addition staff assisted with a pilot project to implement these analysis methods.",,,,84437,16527,,0.8,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2019,165000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY19 DNR watershed modelers will: • Work with the Cedar River Watershed District to model the effect of adopted and proposed land use practices on flood flows and water quality. • Finalize and provide report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) on a Shakopee Creek tributary report assessing the effect of six land use scenarios on hydrology and sediment transport. • Help refine the DNR’s approach to evaluating watershed hydrologic change. Help review altered hydrology assessment techniques and train staff to do the assessments. • Collaborate with the University of Minnesota Supercomputing Institute and the ACE on developing steps to use the supercomputer to simulate how land use changes may alter hydrology sediment and nutrient processes to better address clean water initiatives. This will result in faster more efficient simulations `and more representative presentations.",,,,,84437,16527,,0.8,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2018,176762,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY18 DNR watershed modelers will: • Finalize a report on the Discovery Farms modeling project in Goodhue County and present key findings at the 2017 MN Water Resources Conference. • Continue to collaborate with modeling experts at the University of MN and the Army Corp of Engineers to evaluate and improve limitations in the current suite of models including developing and evaluating values for sediment transport parameters. • Collaborate with the MN Pollution Control Agency in using the larger Shakopee Creek Watershed model developed in FY17 to help evaluate water quality benefits for the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR)’s Working Lands Watershed Restoration Program. • Continue to collaborate with Mower County Soil & Water Conservation District on how to use watershed models to help document measureable improvements as on-the-ground projects are implemented. • Finalize a report on previous years’ Shakopee Creek modeling efforts for the MN River Integrated Watershed Study. • Incorporate results from watershed modeling studies into a DNR report on altered hydrology at the request of the interagency Drainage Management Team led by BWSR. • Work with the Discovery Farm Program’s technical team to identify additional modeling priorities and next steps. • Gain access to a University of MN supercomputer to reduce model run times.","In FY18 DNR watershed modelers: • Provided final report to the Discovery Farm in Goodhue County describing the modeled results relating the effect of existing land use practices and proposed best management practices on the hydrologic sediment and nutrient processes. • Provided the final report on the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) Working Lands Shakopee Creek project to BWSR and presented results at the 2018 MN Water Resources Conference. Simulated the effect of BWSR and DNR recommended land use changes on hydrologic sediment and nutrient processes. • Provided technical assistance on hydrology sediment and nutrient -process modeling in the GSSHA model to a University of Minnesota researcher.",,,,114407,47765,,1.1,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2017,202000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY17 the DNR will: • Complete Shakopee Creek modeling and summarize the results in a detailed report on land management scenarios for local watershed initiatives and decision-support products being developed by the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study partnership. • Work with the Cedar River Watershed District to evaluate one or more BMP strategies review BMP effectiveness and complete a report on project outcomes. • Sponsor a University of Minnesota research project to compare the ability of existing GSSHA vs. SWAT models for Dobbins Creek to predict rates of nutrient loss. • Expand modeling at existing Discovery Farm sites to add nutrient loss rates and sediment erosion to BMP evaluations. • Develop a fine-scale GSSHA model to test its capacity to help inform decisions on proposed drainage improvement projects and selection of associated BMPs. • Present modeling results at an International Drainage Symposium hosted by the University of Minnesota. • Continue to provide technical expertise to drainage-related technical and policy workgroups and issues in various forums. ","In FY17 DNR watershed modelers: • Collaborated with modeling experts at the University of MN and the Army Corp of Engineers to evaluate the capacity to model nutrient loss rates identify modeling limitations and discuss potential solutions. • Completed a modeling project with Discovery Farms Program (Goodhue County site); expanded the model to include sediment transport and nutrient loss estimates; examined water quality benefits associated with practices that increase soil organic content; completed a draft report and presented the results. • Gave four presentations at a University of MN International Drainage Symposium highlighting key areas of learning from the DNR’s watershed modeling work. • Finished Shakopee Creek modeling runs of six alternative land management scenarios to help inform local watershed initiatives and decision-support products being developed by the MN River Integrated Watershed Study partnership. Presented the results at several forums. • Collaborated with Mower County Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) to complete a model predicting the reduction in sediment erosion and hydrologic flow when all projects in the Cedar River Watershed District’s Targeted Watershed grant project are implemented. Presented the results to SWCD staff and discussed how to track future implementation success. • Continued to provide technical expertise to drainage-related technical and policy workgroups. • Developed a GSSHA model for the larger Shakopee Creek Watershed to enhance comparisons with MPCA’s modeling products. ",,,,10622,44566,,1.4,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2016,202000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY16 the DNR will collaborate with the Army Corps of Engineers and other partners of the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study to complete fine-scale modeling and translate products into guidance for selecting best management practices at the basin scale. We will complete model scenarios for Shakopee Creek case studies and start developing “scaling” rules to help translate field-research findings on BMP effectiveness into decision-support guidance for restoration and protection efforts throughout the Minnesota River Basin. We will continue the Discovery Farms research by further developing the field-scale GSSHA models of selected research plots using data collected during edge of field monitoring. The model format for Discovery Farms data is designed to help the Minnesota Agricultural Water Resource Center evaluate how well BMPs work over a wider range of climatic conditions compared to the actual period the practices were monitored. We will also support a Cedar River Watershed District (CRWD) watershed restoration initiative by refining an existing GSSHA model for Dobbins Creek to evaluate one or more BMP implementation strategies identified by the CRWD. We will continue to work with MPCA’s HSPF model on the St. Louis River Watershed. We will adapt the Swedish RIM “RIM” model or “Riparian Profile Flow-Concentration Model ” for use with HSPF to model a number of parameters in the St. Louis River (dissolved organic carbon total mercury methylmercury iron and sulfate concentrations). We will incorporate an extensive set of chemical and flow data collected in 2013 by the DNR into the model. This involves extending MPCA’s initial hydrologic calibration from 2012 to 2014","In FY16 the DNR used fine-scale GSSHA modeling results to support several projects and partnerships to improve the selection placement and design of agricultural best management practices (BMPs) in southern Minnesota. Specifically we: -Continued collaborating with the Army Corps of Engineers and other Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study partners to complete fine-scale modeling in the Shakopee and Seven-Mile Creek subwatersheds and develop products to guide the selection of BMPs at the basin scale. -Developed and delivered modeling results to the Chippewa River Board and stakeholders to guide planning efforts to reestablish shallow lakes that were previously drained. -Assembled a video for the Smithsonian WaterWays Exhibit showing how hydrologic models can help guide management decisions to protect important recreational lakes in the Shakopee Creek system. -Completed models for two Discovery Farm sites that will be used by the Minnesota Agricultural Water Resource Center and partnering farmers. The models indicate that changes in soil organic matter content and modifications to tile drainage practices will reduce runoff and soil erosion and increase soil water availability. -Completed three models at different scales for the Dobbins Creek Watershed to help the Cedar River Watershed District decide which BMPs to implement as part of the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR)’s Targeted Watershed Grant Program. -Continued providing technical expertise to drainage-related technical and policy workgroups and issues in various forums. Staff in the DNR Division of Lands & Minerals collaborated with MPCA staff to write a peer-reviewed paper published in the Journal of Environmental Management about the St. Louis River research described in the proposed outcomes above for FY16.",,,,277403,44144,,2.4,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2015,185000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY15 the DNR will collaborate with the Army Corps of Engineers and other Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study partners to complete fine-scale modeling and translate products into best management practice (BMP) guidance at the basin scale. Staff will complete model scenarios for Shakopee Creek case studies and start developing “scaling” rules to help translate field-research findings on BMP effectiveness into decision-support guidance for restoration and protection efforts throughout the Minnesota River Basin. In coordination with the MN Agricultural Water Resource Center and MN Department of Agriculture modelers will aid Discovery Farms research by developing field-scale GSSHA models of selected research plots to help evaluate BMP effectiveness and reduce uncertainty in interpreting the monitored data. A model format for Discovery Farms data will help evaluate BMP effectiveness over a wider range of climatic conditions than occurred during the monitoring period and improve site-to-site comparisons. Staff will also support a Cedar River Watershed District (CRWD) watershed restoration initiative by refining an existing GSSHA model for Dobbins Creek to incorporate drainage tile so the effects of tile drainage practices can be accurately evaluated together with other BMPs. The results will help refine BMPs recommendations. The DNR will continue collaborating with soil scientists to understand and model soil health management to support drainage and water quality goals. Staff will compile soil health research from multiple sources to ensure the best science is used to explain how soil characteristics change in response to changing tillage practices and other BMPs and accurately incorporate soil physics into reliable model parameters. Staff will continue to coordinate with the Drainage Work Group and provide technical support for the Drainage Management Team as they review Minnesota’s drainage policies and code.","In FY15 the DNR continued to work with the Army Corps of Engineers and other Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study (MRIWS) partners. The goal is to improve the predictions these models make about the effectiveness of potential watershed restoration activities. We developed a tool that will help combine land use land cover and crop management practices with soil type in the model which will estimate differences in water flow as these relationships change. Maps showing locations for targeted BMPs that will significantly reduce sediment loading are being used by local SWCDs to work with individual landowners. The use of detailed maps at a fine scale in this targeting exercise demonstrates the value of the GSSHA modeling in identifying the effectiveness of BMP implementation at both field and watershed scales. We worked with the Discovery Farms research team to develop a field-scale GSSHA model based on actual monitoring data. The model gives a detailed summary of water balance with and without a pattern tile drainage system for both corn and soybean rotations helping evaluate BMP effectiveness and interpret monitoring data in a pattern tiled field. The DNR’s mining hydrologists worked with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to enhance their HSPF (Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran) model for the St. Louis River watershed by: 1) improving the mining discharge information in the model and; 2) developing user input files that incorporate “chemical tracers” to mine waters so that impacts from mining and other activities can be evaluated more quickly and accurately. This work will help better identify sources of pollution problems make mine permitting decisions and target restoration plans.",,,,170831,41287,,1.9,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2014,185000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY14 the DNR watershed modeling team will continue its work with the Cannon River stakeholders and use the modeling experience developed for the Maple Creek Subwatershed to evaluate how to target and select BMPs for the adjacent Turtle Creek Subwatershed. The DNR watershed modeling team will complete the Shakopee Creek case studies (JD 27 and JD29) as well as third subwatershed (Huse Creek) which will serve as a reference watershed. The DNR will combine the results of the Shakopee Creek case studies with those of the Army COE modelers (who are modeling 7-Mile Creek) to address historical impacts of wetland loss and drainage in the Minnesota River Basin and to help develop a watershed strategy to address TMDL goals. The DNR’s Drainage Engineer will continue to coordinate with the Drainage Work Group on drainage policy and reshaping state drainage code. The modeling team will work cooperatively with University of Minnesota researchers and others to increase our understanding on how BMPs change soil properties that are used in models to interpret hydrologic response. The modeling team will also cooperate with University of Minnesota researchers on a pilot project that will help evaluate how drainage alters the value of land. This project may lead to improvements in determining the benefits and impacts from drainage and who should pay for maintenance of drainage systems and drainage system improvements that may benefit others than the landowners where the improvements are made.","In FY14 the DNR continued to work with the Army Corps Of Engineers and other partners involved in the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study (MRIWS). DNR’s three modeling case studies in the Shakopee Creek watershed were not completed. Instead effort was focused on stakeholder meetings and MRIWS team meetings to identify the specific series of landscape conditions (model scenarios) that need to be evaluated. Because improved soil health management will be a critical component of water restoration and protection strategies existing research on soil physics was carefully reviewed to insure that our models accurately represent those processes. Significant effort was also invested in FY14 to improve how climate and rainfall data are incorporated into our models. Climatic parameters are key drivers of how water (and pollutants) moves across and through landscapes. Accurately incorporating this information is critical if our modeling efforts are going to simulate physical processes in the landscape and provide reliable decision-support guidance. A guidance document on radar precipitation estimation was prepared. The DNR’s Drainage Engineer continued to provide expert technical input into the effort being led by the Board of Water and Soil Resources to review Minnesota’s drainage policy and code. Input was provided to both the Drainage Work Group (DWG) and the Drainage Management Team (DMT). The DNR continued to participate on the Interagency Clean Water Research Sub-Team led that prioritizes and guides research studies paid for by the clean water fund. These studies are designed to improve understanding of BMP effectiveness and develop guidance for targeting and installation of these beneficial practices. The Cannon River/Straight River GSSHA pilot study with the MPCA and Cannon River stakeholders is on hold after the lead modeler left state service. ",,,,122059,32439,,1.3,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2013,230000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY13 the DNR watershed modeling team will work with the Cannon River stakeholders to complete the Straight River prioritization of Management Zones (PMZs) in support of TMDL implementation strategies. A report summarizing this effort will be completed. The Shakopee Creek case studies will be completed to address impacts of wetland loss and drainage impacts with assessments reflecting historic land use changes. Coordination with the MRIWS team will help identify additional watershed assessment needs to begin the development of a strategy for targeting BMPs that will support the framework for a Decision Support System (DSS). A draft report of modeling outcomes will be prepared. CW Modeling Team will work with the States’ CW team to coordinate other critical modeling needs that can be initiated in FY13. The CW Drainage Engineer will continue to coordinate with the DWG and others doing drainage research to identify critical gaps in this research. ","In FY13 the DNR watershed modeling team worked with stakeholders in the Cannon River watershed to target and prioritize the placement of best management practices (BMPs) in the Maple Creek Subwatershed (part of the Straight River watershed). The analysis predicted that a combination of the most effective BMPs would reduce suspended sediment by up to 40% and reduce peak storm flows by up to 6% if implemented at realistic landowner adoption rates. The results provided information based on the specific characteristics of the Maple Creek subwatershed on how to target the types and locations of BMPs to maximize improvements in runoff quality and quantity. A draft report summarizing this effort was completed and is available to the partners for their inclusion in the development prioritized and targeted implementation activities. The Shakopee Creek case studies were not completed as scheduled in FY13 because the overall project is behind schedule due to reduced levels of federal funding. DNR’s watershed modeling team began establishing a process for incorporating radar derived precipitation estimates into the model so the model better represents that local rainfall conditions resulting in a more accurately calibrated model. DNR’s Drainage Engineer continues to coordinate with the Drainage Work Group and others doing drainage research to identify critical gaps in our knowledge and decision-support capacity. Coordination with the team developing the Agricultural Certification Pilot in Minnesota identified opportunities for using the GSSHA model to help document the effectiveness of that program to deliver desired outcomes and progress toward meeting TMDL goals. ",,,,266359,37517,,1.3,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2012,230000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY12 DNR hydrologists will apply the ""Gridded Subsurface Surface Hydrologic Analysis"" (GSSHA) model to evaluate BMP alternatives for clean water restoration and protection studies and will participate in Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team meetings to help identify research needs and shortcomings in outdated State Drainage Code language Modeling: * Calibrate Shakopee Creek wetland and lake restoration GSSHA models to support restoration and BMP prioritization efforts in Chippewa River Basin. * Finalize Straight River (Cannon River Watershed) GSSHA Model Calibrations for TSS and work with CRWP on Prioritizing Management Zones in Straight River Watershed in support of TMDL implementation.","In FY12 DNR watershed modelers updated data inputs for GSSHA models in Shakopee Creek and the Straight River to reflect more precise watershed characteristics now available with the release of detailed LiDAR digital terrain data. This improvement will result in improved modeling of BMP alternatives. Support for the Straight River TMDL implementation is under way. The Turtle Creek model has been calibrated and preliminary BMP targeting in the Maple Creek Watershed is being coordinated with our partners in the Cannon River Watershed. Work continues on the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study (MRIWS). Watershed modelers met to prioritize where case studies will be performed and to determine what issues are critical outcomes of these case studies. Work continues with the stakeholders in Shakopee Creek to determine critical outcomes from this case study and how this information will support the MRIWS. Desired outcomes will include wetland restoration benefits and impacts of lost storage due to drainage of shallow lakes. The Clean Water Drainage Engineer attended all Drainage Work Group (DWG) meetings in addition to supporting the CW research committee in reviewing grant applications for BWSR and MDA CW research. ",,,,107171,38473,,1.2,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2011,95000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY11 DNR hydrologists will apply ""Gridded Subsurface Surface Hydrologic Analysis"" (GSSHA) model to evaluate BMP alternatives for clean water restoration and protection studies: * Shakopee Creek wetland and lake restoration GSSHA analysis * Straight River (Cannon River Watershed) GSSHA Model Calibrations","In FY11 DNR hydrologists participated in all Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team meetings. Modeling: * Shakopee Creek: continued work with national science team to review model options that will provide the best framework for a decision support system that will give data access and guidance to stakeholders. * Prepared preliminary report on GSSHA model calibrations in the Straight River. Models will be used to better identify sources of sediment in the watershed for support of a clean water restoration (Total Maximum Daily Load) study.",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
25359,"Watershed Modeling",2010,85000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY10 DNR will apply the ""Gridded Subsurface Surface Hydrologic Analysis"" (GSSHA) model to evaluate BMP alternatives for clean water restoration and protection studies: * Cedar River culvert sizing * Shakopee Creek wetland and lake restoration * Straight River (Cannon River Watershed)","In FY10 DNR hydrologists participated in all Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Tram meetings. Modeling: * Finalized Cedar River culvert sizing analysis. Presented model results to local governments and watershed science peers. * Shakopee Creek: worked with national science team to review model options that will provide the best framework for a decision support system that will give data access and guidance to stakeholders. * Worked on GSSHA model calibration and refinement to better identify sources of sediment in the watershed for support of a clean water restoration (Total Maximum Daily Load) study.",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2025,1650000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. ","In collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners, continue contributing geomorphic survey and related data, analyses and reports, as well as hydrologic change information from DNR Evaluation of Hydrologic Change (EHC) technical summaries, to aid stressor identification, watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (CWMP) development and implementation under the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program, and other implementation efforts. Fully populate the stream geomorphology survey database that we finished developing in FY24 and complete a public web app to expand access to this information. Continue developing regional curves to help stream practitioners accelerate and validate analyses and design restoration projects.   These information resources will continue to enhance watershed partners’ understanding of biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and help teams identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience (see Nonpoint Restoration and Protection). ",,,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2024,1650000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. "," Stream data and related information: In FY24, DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey and related data, analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners to aid stressor identification, watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, and Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (CWMP) development and implementation under the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program. We anticipate completing and populating the statewide DNR geomorphology survey database built in FY23 to house and organize stream survey data and reports, and starting if not also completing an associated public webmap to expand access to this information. We will continue developing regional curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): We will complete and publish the 25 EHC technical summaries nearly completed in FY23, making the full series (one technical summary for each of 47 major watersheds evaluated) discoverable and searchable in the MN Water Research Library. We plan to publish the statewide EHC meta-analysis completed in FY22 and anticipate completing and posters for at least 20 northwestern Minnesota watersheds begun in FY23 that integrate EHC findings with other information to communicate watershed health conditions, trends, potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers in plain language and graphics. All of the above types of information will continue to enhance watershed partners’ understanding of biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience (see Nonpoint Restoration and Protection). ","Generated information products in the following two categories to help watershed partners understand water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. Stream geomorphology and connectivity data and information: Worked on at least 31 stream geomorphology surveys (some involving multiple sites) in 19 major watersheds, to aid MPCA water quality stressor analysis, WRAPS report updates, regional curve development, and implementation projects. Finished developing a database to house, organize and improve practitioner and public access to stream survey data, summaries and reports. Continued developing sediment rating, bank erosion and other types of regional curves to help practitioners better predict stream channel sediment loads, validate stream analyses, and design restoration projects. Began culvert inventories in four major watersheds, in subwatersheds selected by local partners; the data will be added to the DNR Culvert Inventory Database. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): Finished publishing the 47 EHC watershed technical summaries completed the previous year (see report series in Minnesota Water Research Digital Library). Completed precipitation analyses for 12 major watersheds in northwestern Minnesota to help interpret and communicate EHC findings. Completed posters for at least 20 major watersheds in northwestern Minnesota, integrating EHC findings with other information to communicate watershed health conditions, trends, impacts and management implications to local watershed managers, in plain language and graphics.   ",,,,1530779,264356,,11.4,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2023,1435000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","Stream data and related information: In FY23, DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey and related data, analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners to aid stressor identification, watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (CWMP) development and implementation under the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program, and the development of regional curves. We will continue developing the statewide DNR geomorphology web map piloted in FY20 to house, organize and improve access to the above data and information. We will continue developing regional curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): We will complete and publish DNR EHC technical summaries for all 47 of the watersheds evaluated in FY21. Staff will begin using the summaries to disseminate key findings to MPCA staff working on WRAPS updates, local 1W1P partnerships engaged in developing or implementing CWMPs, and other watershed partners. Watershed posters: Staff will continue developing watershed posters and/or similar tools to help integrate EHC and stream geomorphology study findings with other information, identify key takeaways and communicate watersheds conditions and trends as well as potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers, in plain language and graphics. All of the above types of information will continue to help the MPCA and other watershed partners better understand biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience (see Nonpoint Restoration and Protection). "," Stream data and information: Worked on 32 stream surveys (of which we completed 13) in 20 major watersheds. Worked on 12 geomorphology studies, summaries or reports (of which 6 we completed 6) in 6 major watersheds; 5 are intensive subwatershed stream sediment studies. Completed culvert inventories in several subwatersheds. Continued developing sediment rating and other regional curves to help practitioners better predict stream channel sediment loads, validate stream analyses, and help design restoration projects. Built a database to house, organize and improve practitioner and public access to stream survey data and reports, as part of the effort begun in FY21 to centralize and publicize this information. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): Completed 22 technical summaries and nearly completed the other 25 for 47 major watersheds evaluated in FY21. Published most of the completed summaries in the MN Water Research Library (publishing was temporarily stalled as the library moved to a new platform). Began using the summaries to disseminate key findings to watershed partners including MPCA staff working on WRAPS updates and local 1W1P partnerships developing or implementing watershed management plans. Started developing posters for at least 20 major watersheds in northwestern Minnesota, integrating EHC findings with other information to communicate watershed health conditions, trends, potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers in plain language and graphics. All of the above information products helped enhance watershed partners’ understanding of biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. ",,,,1216245,225000,,9.7,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2022,1440000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. "," In FY22 DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey data analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners to aid stressor identification watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development and Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan development and implementation. We will further develop and populate the statewide DNR geomorphology survey data web map piloted in FY20. In FY22 we will develop a template for DNR evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC) technical summaries. We will start and aim to finish producing summaries for all 47 watersheds for which we previously completed an EHC analysis. We will also complete and summarize a statewide meta-analysis and use the results to give statewide and regional context to the watershed-specific evaluations. In FY22 we will complete a project to pilot the interpretation of DNR EHC data by field staff culminating in a graphically designed poster for at least four watersheds. Staff will use the posters to help communicate EHC results together with data from DNR stream geomorphology studies and other information. The posters will help staff use pictures and plain language to describe key facets of watershed health to local watershed planning groups. In FY22 we will continue developing regional sediment rating curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. All of the above types of information help MPCA and other watershed partners better understand biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. ","Stream data and information: Worked on 29 stream surveys (of which we completed 14) in 22 major watersheds. Worked on 14 geomorphology studies, summaries or reports, summaries or reports (of which we completed 7) in 10 major watersheds. The latter 14 included 4 intensive subwatershed stream sediment studies and a catchment-scale sediment reduction plan based on one of these studies. Made significant progress on developing the statewide geomorphology web map piloted in FY20 to house, organize and improve access to the above types of data and information. Continued developing sediment rating and other regional curves to help practitioners better predict stream channel sediment loads for Minnesota streams, validate stream analyses, and help design stream restoration projects. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): Completed a template for EHC technical summaries and started compiling summaries for each of the 47 watersheds evaluated in FY21. Completed a statewide meta-analysis, the results of which are being incorporated into the watershed technical summaries to provide regional and statewide context. Watershed posters: Completed a pilot project to help staff practice interpreting EHC results for watershed partners, resulting in posters for 4 watersheds and leading staff to start developing posters for 5 other watersheds, of which they completed 2. The posters help staff integrate EHC and stream geomorphology study findings with other information, identify key takeaways, and communicate watersheds conditions, trends, potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers, in plain language and graphics. All of the above data and information products continued to help the MPCA and other watershed partners better understand biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. ",,,,1430388,200647,,11.9,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2021,1475000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY21 DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey data analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners primarily to aid stressor identification and watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development. We will continue to populate the channel assessment web map developed in FY20. In FY21 we will complete a consistent repeatable evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC) for every major watershed that has the necessary streamflow gauge data (besides those piloted in FY20)?about 50 evaluations in all?and analyze the results statewide. In four (4) major watersheds we will pilot approaches to help staff interpret and effectively communicate EHC results to local partners especially those who are developing Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans. In FY21 we will continue developing regional sediment rating curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. ","Contributed stream geomorphology information for MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) WRAPS updates and local watershed planning and implementation: Worked on 38 stream surveys (completing 21 of these) in 16 major watersheds mostly for MPCA stream stressor identification. Worked on 16 stream geomorphology studies (completing three of these) in 11 major watersheds including eight intensive subwatershed stream sediment studies. Completed standardized evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC) analyses for 59 USGS streamflow gages in 41 major watersheds building on those completed in FY20 for a final total of 65 gages evaluated (every gage that had the necessary data) in 47 watersheds. Completed or worked on six EHC watershed summaries. Began a pilot project in four watersheds to help DNR hydrologists and clean water specialists practice interpreting and communicating EHC watershed analysis results to watersheds partners especially those engaged in local watershed planning. Continued developing regional rating curves to predict stream channel sediment loads for Minnesota streams validate stream analyses and help design stream restoration projects. ",,,,1324021,179580,,12.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2020,1478815,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY20 DNR will continue working with state and local partners in watersheds where the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local governments are developing or updating Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS). We will finish developing and start deploying new methods of analysis to streamline and enhance the hydrology and stream geomorphology information we contribute. Specifically we will evaluate hydrologic change for at least two major watersheds continue subwatershed-scale stream stability and sediment supply studies (important for addressing sediment impairments) in at least five major watersheds and communicate the findings to watershed partners. Faster progress is anticipated in future years as staff gain experience with the new methods. We will also continue to develop regional curves to speed up and validate stream analyses and to help design stream restoration projects. ","Contributed stream geomorphology and connectivity information primarily for watersheds where the MPCA and local partners were developing or updating WRAPS: Conducted at least 41 stream surveys in 15 watersheds and started making the data available in a statewide web map and in story maps such as this one. Collected culvert inventory data in three (3) watersheds to be added to a statewide GIS layer. Completed at least 21 and worked on at least 16 more stream geomorphology analyses or reports in 20 watersheds. Seven (7) of these analyses are intensive subwatershed studies that distinguish stream sources from other sources of sediment in impaired streams to help partners identify catchments where upland restoration efforts stream restoration efforts or a combination will be most effective. Collaborated with MPCA and local partners on the above. MPCA and partners use the information to better understand biological and water quality impairments improve pollutant load calculations and help identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. Completed a major project to standardize streamline and enhance DNR hydrology and stream geomorphology contributions: Finished developing a consistent repeatable method of evaluation to quantify the degree of hydrologic change in a watershed and related impacts to flooding channel-forming flows and biological community health. Staff piloted the evaluation in six (6) major watersheds. In five (5) other major watersheds staff applied a new consistent and repeatable process developed in FY19 to identify subwatersheds where an intensive study of stream stability and sediment supply would be most fruitful for discussion with local partners. Continued developing regional rating curves to predict stream channel sediment loads for Minnesota streams validate stream analyses and help design stream restoration projects. ",,,,1291321,202433,,12.8,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2019,1549694,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY19 DNR field staff will continue working with state and local partners in watersheds where Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) are under way. DNR regional staff will continue to provide information and analysis that helps improve watershed assessments and identify effective and lasting restoration and protection strategies. Measurable outcomes will be similar to those for FY18.","• Contributed hydrology stream geomorphology and connectivity information for 47 watersheds where the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners were developing or updating WRAPS. Gathered and analyzed data for 39 of these—including but not limited to stream studies in 25 watersheds; streamflow precipitation climate and/or lake hydrology data for 28 watersheds; and culvert inventory data or analysis in at least 14 watersheds. Five of the stream studies are multi-year subwatershed-scale stream stability and sediment supply studies essential for addressing sediment impairments. MPCA and partners use this information in several parts of the WRAPS process especially stressor identification to better understand biological and water quality impairments improve pollutant load calculations and identify solutions. • Used the above information to recommend enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience in 40 of the 47 watersheds noted above. (See Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection.) Participated in WRAPS meetings in most of the watersheds and reviewed several draft WRAPS reports. • Continued an effort begun in FY18 to streamline and enhance the hydrology and geomorphology information we contribute by developing consistent processes for evaluating hydrologic change at the major watershed scale and identifying subwatersheds where intensive stream stability and sediment supply studies would be worthwhile. • Continued developing regional curves for Minnesota to enable certain stream characteristics to be inferred based on drainage area and ratings for similar streams. Regional curves are used to validate stream analyses and help design stream restoration projects. In FY19 this involved stream surveys ongoing coordination with the US Geological Survey on sediment sampling in streams and new collaborative work to develop data collection standards for regional streambank erosion curves. ",,,,1291321,202433,,12.5,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2018,1567393,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY18 the DNR will continue working with state and local partners in watersheds where the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) process is active. DNR regional staff will continue to provide information and analysis that helps improve watershed assessments and identify effective and lasting restoration and protection strategies. Measurable outcomes of this work will be similar to those stated for FY17.","In FY18 DNR field staff continued to provide information and analysis to state and local agencies to help identify pollution problems and develop lasting solutions. Staff gathered and analyzed data and information for 35 of the state’s 80 major watersheds including but not limited to 133 stream studies and 7 Total Maximum Daily Load studies. DNR staff synthesize and deliver this information to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local government and community partners to help inform key stages of the WRAPS process – from sample site selection to stressor identification to identifying and targeting implementation strategies. For example the MPCA uses some of this information to help identify pollution sources and refine watershed models used to calculate pollutant loads. In the strategy development stage of the WRAPS process DNR staff use information they gathered and analyzed earlier to help partners identify multiple-benefit strategies that address the root causes of pollution problems. In FY18 they helped WRAPS partners identify these types of strategies in 47 watersheds.",,,,1393491,220382,,15.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2017,1638038,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY17 the DNR will continue working with state and local partners to provide information and analysis that helps improve watershed assessments and identify effective and lasting restoration and protection strategies. Numeric measures of this work will be similar to the outcomes stated for FY16. ","In FY17 DNR regional staff continued to provide information and analysis to state and local agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Staff gathered and analyzed data and information for 52 major watersheds. This included but was not limited to 175 stream studies in 33 watersheds and 5 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies. DNR staff synthesize and deliver this information to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local government and community partners to help inform key stages of the WRAPS process – from sample site selection early in the process to stressor identification to identifying and targeting implementation strategies. For example the MPCA uses some of this information to help identify and locate sources of pollution and refine watershed models used to calculate pollutant loads. When a watershed reaches the strategy development stage of the WRAPS process DNR regional staff use information they gathered and analyzed earlier in the process to help partners identify and develop multiple-benefit strategies that address the root causes of pollution problems. In FY17 they helped WRAPS partners identify these types of strategies in 40 watersheds. ",,,,1450406,209455,,16.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2016,1624000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY16 the DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY15. We will continue to participate in multi-agency partnerships to improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally we will participate in multi-agency review of state grants for Clean Water Funded work.","In FY16 DNR field staff continued to provide information and analysis to state and local agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Staff gathered and analyzed data for 55 major watersheds. This included more than 200 studies involving field surveys and analysis of hydrology stream stability and/or culvert inventory data. It also included assistance with 23 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies. The resulting information helps the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) identify and locate sources of pollution and develop and improve watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. The information contributed by the DNR also helps provide a foundation for identifying and targeting restoration and protection strategies and actions. In FY16 DNR field staff helped state and local partners identify and develop restoration and protection strategies in 39 watersheds. Our participation helps teams identify strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide multiple environmental benefits. As in previous years DNR staff participated in the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources’ multi-agency review of Clean Water Fund competitive grant proposals for water quality implementation projects by local governments and community partners. ",,,,1708915,205194,,18.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2015,1591245,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY 15 the DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and clean water restoration and protection strategies. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY14. DNR staff will continue to participate in multi-agency partnerships to improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of state grants for Clean Water Funded work.","In FY15 DNR hydrologists and clean water specialists provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. The DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. This provides a foundation for targeting water quality restoration and protection work. We gathered and analyzed existing data for 57 to provide information that enhances our understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. The data and analysis also provides a foundation for targeting restoration and protection efforts. This work included 161 stream geomorphology and hydrology field surveys. We also assisted with 18 TMDL studies. The DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 45 watersheds. Our participation helps teams identify strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of 100 state Clean Water Fund grant proposals for water quality projects that are administered by the Board of Water and Soil Resources.",,,,1414231,227305,,16.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2014,1750000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY 14 DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY13. DNR staff will continue to participate in multi-agency partnerships to improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of applications for Clean Water Fund implementation grants.","In FY14 DNR staff provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. This provides a foundation for targeting water quality restoration and protection work. Field staff gathered and analyzed information in 34 watersheds and conducted 211 studies of stream geomorphology and hydrology plus a detailed study of proper culvert design for stream stability. This information results in improved models and enhanced understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 37 major watersheds and 30 TMDL studies not associated with a major watershed project. DNR’s participation results in strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of over 180 state Clean Water Fund grant proposals for water quality projects.",,,,1287551,255250,,15.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2013,1630000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY 13 DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. This work includes the following tasks: 1)Gathering analyzing and sharing existing information. DNR has a wealth of information on stream flows water levels climatology fisheries habitats rare species watershed boundaries and more which is used in planning watershed assessments identifying pollution types and sources and developing watershed protection and restoration strategies that provide clean water and other ecological benefits. 2)Conducting technical watershed studies. This is generally field reconnaissance and collecting data about stream features (width depth bank erosion) that helps scientists develop computer models to predict pollution sources and amounts as well as inform findings about the causes of water impairments and the best approaches for watershed restoration. The stream measurements - known as stream geomorphology - are also being used in more detailed studies of sediment movement in watersheds and floodplain mapping and analysis. 3)Developing Major Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. With agency and local partners DNR staff will participate in a process that uses model results data synthesis local input and professional knowledge to recommend protection and restoration options that will be implemented locally for a given major watershed. DNR staff will also participate in multi-agency partnerships to continually improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of state and federal grants for Clean Water work.","In FY13 DNR staff provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. The result is a foundation for targeting of water quality restoration and protection work. Field staff gathered and analyzed information in 30 watersheds and conducted 113 geomorphology studies plus a detailed study of proper culvert design for stream stability. This information results in improved models and enhanced understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 23 major watersheds and 17 TMDL studies not associated with a major watershed project. DNR’s participation results in strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of over 162 state Clean Water Fund grant proposals for water quality projects.",,,,995643,176930,,11.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2012,1630000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY 12 DNR will continue to partner with federal and state agencies as well as local communities to provide technical assistance to development of clean water restoration and protection strategies. This work includes the following tasks: 1) Gathering analyzing and sharing existing information. DNR has a wealth of information on stream flows water levels climatology fisheries habitats rare species watershed boundaries and more which is used in planning watershed assessments identifying pollution types and sources and developing watershed protection and restoration strategies that provide clean water and other ecological benefits. 2) Conducting technical watershed studies. This is generally field reconnaissance and collecting data about stream features (width depth bank erosion) that helps scientists develop computer models to predict pollution sources and amounts as well as inform findings about the causes of water impairments and the best approaches for watershed restoration. The stream measurements - known as stream geomorphology - are also being used in more detailed studies of sediment movement in watersheds. 3) Developing Major Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. With agency and local partners DNR staff will participate in a process that uses model results data synthesis local input and professional knowledge to recommend protection and restoration options that will be implemented locally for a given major watershed. DNR staff will also participate in multi-agency partnerships to continually improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of state and federal grants for Clean Water work. ","In FY12 DNR staff provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. The result is a foundation for targeting of water quality restoration and protection work. Field staff gathered and analyzed information in 18 watersheds and conducted 30 geomorphology studies. This information results in improved models and enhanced understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 30 major watersheds and 36 TMDL studies not associated with a major watershed project. DNR’s participation results in strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of over 200 state Clean Water Fund grants for water quality projects.",,,,846187,337915,,9.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2011,1182500,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY11 DNR will work with state and local partners to provide technical assistance for development of clean water restoration and protection strategies. The number of watershed strategies being developed are decreasing as MPCA has moved to larger scale watershed projects. However the quality and depth of the technical assistance will increase and will result in more detailed and prioritized plans. ","In FY11 DNR provided technical assistance to 52 clean water strategy efforts. This assistance included participation in pollution studies focused on impaired lakes and river reaches as well as larger watershed-scale Major Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. This technical assistance consisted of collaboration with state and local agencies in study and planning sessions designing and conducting field reconnaissance work on fish passage geomorphology stressor identification and Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) to review enhance or guide the design of watershed studies and restoration options. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review and evaluation of 184 grant proposals for 3 grant funding sources (Clean Water Partnership Nonpoint Source Grant and Clean Water Fund) and did technical reviews on 41 other clean water studies or plans.",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2010,689000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY10 DNR will work with state and local partners to provide technical assistance for development or implementation of clean water restoration and protection strategies.","In FY10 DNR provided technical assistance to 63 TMDL (Total Maxiumum Daily Load) or watershed planning efforts. This assistance included: - work on over 20 technical studies by assisting in design and conducting field reconnaissance work on fish passage geomorphology stressor identification and Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) to review enhance or guide the design of TMDL studies and restoration options. - review and evaluation of 50 Clean Water Partnership 122 Nonpoint Source Grant and 318 Clean Water Fund Grant proposals.",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2025,500000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. ","The WHAF website will be reorganized for consistent language, conceptual alignment and improved navigation to the WHAF Suite of Applications. Steps to migrate the WHAF: Explorer application to an updated IT infrastructure will continue with assistance from MNIT staff. Health scores and data layers in WHAF: Explorer will be updated to deliver the latest land cover and impairment data. WHAF research staff will coordinate with MPCA to deliver annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer and Impaired Waters data. WHAF: Lakes will be updated annually to align with data collection and analysis updates by the DNR Lake Ecology Unit. The updated Climate Normals and Departure data calculated by WHAF staff will be delivered in the WHAF: Explorer and the data will be publicly available for download from the Minnesota Geospatial Commons. Additional data layers showing restoration management actions will be added to the WHAF: Explorer. Other data layers will be evaluated for addition when requested by partner agencies and organizations. Additional priority Watershed Health Scores will be updated with best available data and best science approach. The calculation process will be scripted for repeatability. Online documentation for health scores will be updated to align with new scoring analyses. WHAF Major Watershed Reports will be prioritized for revision and new interactive delivery options considered. The WHAF team will publish a chapter in the science book series, ‘Smart Technology for Water Resources’ to document the WHAF approach and share technical details with partners and other audiences. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will continue to build support for the use of the WHAF Suite of Applications. Quarterly newsletter will continue to provide updates on advancements in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework to nearly 7000 subscribers.        ",,,,,,,,,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2024,500000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. ","In FY24, MNIT will hire a new programmer and the WHAF Team will begin updating the WHAF Map application to align with new data storage and delivery protocols. New analysis features and functions will be incorporated into the map application. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to annually deliver an update to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer.  Health scores and data layers derived from the latest National Land Cover Data release will be updated. GIS staff will support DNR efforts to deliver analyzed Climate Projection data and update Groundwater Areas of Concern for water availability. Priority Watershed Health Scores will be updated to new watershed boundaries. Data layers showing implemented management actions will be added and other data layers will be evaluated for addition when requested by partner agencies and organizations. Online documentation for health scores will be updated to align with new scoring analyses. WHAF analyses and reports will be prioritized for revision based on the updated Watershed Boundary data set. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will continue to build support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. Quarterly newsletter will continue to provide updates on advancements in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework. ","In FY24, MNIT hired a new WHAF application developer, and the project staff began updating the WHAF data infrastructure to align with new data storage and delivery protocols. Some health score calculations were updated to incorporate new input data and to automate score generation for moving health scores to new watershed boundary data. Health scores, data layers and the WHAF: Land Cover application was updated to align with the latest National Land Cover Data and Cropland Data releases. WHAF research staff summarized historic climate data to provide an updated 30-year climate ‘normal’ and departures from historic patterns for temperature, annual and seasonal precipitation. WHAF research staff coordinated with MPCA to deliver the annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer and to deliver MPCA 2024 impairment/assessments data. Staff participated in analyses for ground water availability and helped expand reporting of stream restoration projects. The WHAF: Explorer map delivered 180 data layers including 3 new data layers showing implemented management actions, as well as a suite of 41 health scores online and an additional 36 scores available for download. In FY24, WHAF staff enhanced the WHAF: Lakes application improving the way that it shares lake health data, health scores and grades for 3,000 lakes. The new application continued to drive additional online users with annual use of WHAF applications reaching more than 34,000 sessions. WHAF training and support was provided upon request by agency partners, including presentations to Clean Water staff at DNR and MPCA, as well as direct inquiries from individual users. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to more than 6400 subscribers. Online documentation for health scores was updated to align with new scoring analyses and web navigation was improved.   ",,,,253145,43125,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2023,465000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY23 DNR will continue to enhance the WHAF 2.0 Map and will also publish the WHAF for Lakes map application. New data layers will be added to the map when it advances watershed understanding and builds our partnership with other organizations and agencies. Data regarding the implementation of management actions will be evaluated for inclusion in the WHAF. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to annually deliver an update to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. WHAF staff will coordinate with MPCA to explore prioritization methods and delivery options for nutrient reduction strategies. The suite of WHAF Health Scores will be reviewed and prioritized for updating. Priority Health Score updates will be implemented and supporting online documentation will be updated. WHAF analysis and reporting products will be prioritized for revision based on the updated Watershed Boundary data set (anticipated, FY 23). Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. "," In FY23 DNR completed and delivered the WHAF for Lakes application that shares lake health data, health scores, health grades, and a scalable map for 3,000 lakes. The new application brought 2,500 online users in one month and increased annual use of WHAF applications to nearly 20,000 sessions. GIS staff coordinated with MPCA to deliver the annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. Map data layers were added or updated as requested, with a total of 201 layers now available. WHAF staff reviewed final changes to the pending watershed boundary data update. WHAF training and support was provided upon request by agency partners, including presentations to Clean Water staff at DNR, MPCA and BWSR, as well as direct inquiries from individual users. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to 5500 subscribers.   ",,,,292038,46891,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2022,460000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY22 DNR will enhance WHAF 2.0 with additional analytic tools. New data layers will be added to the map when it advances watershed understanding and builds our partnership with other organizations and agencies. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to annually deliver new streams added to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. The project with the Lake Ecology Unit will develop summary charts that deliver key lake conditions within a watershed context. Additional user guidance with applied examples will be delivered. WHAF will begin steps to adjust health scores watershed reports and analysis to reflect the new watershed boundaries scheduled to be published in 2022. Analysis of climate projection data will be coordinated with Minnesota State Climatology office. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. ","In FY22 DNR enhanced the WHAF Map with new data including the Stream Gage network. GIS staff coordinated with MPCA to deliver the annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. User support added 14 new Use Examples and improved Map Help. The WHAF for Lakes project was coordinated with the Lake Ecology Unit to prepare a suite of lakes data and data summaries, including a Lake Health Score. Lake clarity data was acquired from the U of MN and a draft application to deliver the Lakes data was completed. WHAF staff prepared data products for the anticipated watershed boundary data update (boundary data publication delayed until FY23). The WHAF online application had 4500 users access the platform 6500 times. WHAF training and support was provided remotely upon request by DNR and agency partners, including the seventh year of U of MN classroom support and a joint training with MN Dept. of Health on drinking water risks. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to 4900 subscribers. Two WHAF Team positions were filled after long vacancies, impacting accomplishments in FY22. ",,,,311468,24693,,1.36,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2021,425000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY21 DNR will enhance WHAF version 2.0 with additional analytic tools. New data layers will be added to the map when it advances watershed understanding and builds our partnership with other organizations and agencies. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to double the number of streams included in the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. The historic land use analysis will be delivered as interactive land use charts at different watershed scales. Data analysis to summarize and deliver charts of wetland and lake conditions will be developed. Additional user guidance with applied examples will be delivered. WHAF products will sync to the new watershed boundary dataset when that data is published. Analysis of climate projection data will be coordinated with Minnesota State Climatology office. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. ","In FY21 the DNR enhanced WHAF 2.0 with additional analytic tools and data including links to stream and groundwater monitoring networks and 'change over time' for three health scores. GIS staff coordinated with MPCA to double the number of streams in the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. The Land Use application was added to deliver current and historic land use cropping and water use as interactive charts at different watershed scales. The WHAF online application had 5000 users access the platform 7300 times. Additional user guidance and applied use examples were added to the WHAF map and the WHAF website. A project with the Lake Ecology Unit was initiated to deliver summary charts of lake conditions within a watershed context. WHAF training and support was provided remotely upon request by DNR staff and agency partners including University of Minnesota classroom support for the sixth consecutive year. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to 4100 subscribers. ",,,,393883,55386,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2020,421185,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY20 DNR will enhance WHAF version 2.0 with additional tools; advanced location searches map sharing and use guides with applied examples. A tool will be developed to deliver interactive land use charts at different watershed scales. The programming code will be designed as a template for future tools. WHAF products will be prepared to sync with the new watershed boundary dataset when that data is published. Additional data for forest harvest and lake conditions will be added to the WHAF map. Analysis of climate projection data will be coordinated with Minnesota State Climatology office. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. ","In FY20 the DNR enhanced the WHAF Map version 2.0 with improved location searches map sharing and watershed size at all spatial scales. The map delivers more than 180 GIS data layers. WHAF staff added 10 new data layers to the map including forest harvest lake conditions climate departures and drinking water concerns. A Map Tool Reference Guide and Map Process Guide were added to support users. A special IT project to analyze historic land use data was completed. WHAF products are prepared to sync with the new watershed boundary dataset when that data is published. Analysis of climate projection data was postponed pending additional data analysis by the Minnesota State Climatology office. WHAF training and support was provided remotely when request by DNR staff and agency partners. Quarterly newsletters were sent to 3200 subscribers that use the WHAF map and tools. ",,,,380165,44986,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2019,336306,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY19 DNR will complete the transition to version 2.0 of the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) interactive web map. The watershed health scores website and map will be synced to match updated watershed boundaries. The 80 watershed health report cards will be updated and delivered online. Staff will complete four special projects: A project with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to prioritize streams for protection with the results delivered in the WHAF; A decision support tool in the WHAF to help DNR staff and local partners prioritize and target more intensive stream erosion studies; Integrating more groundwater and drinking water data in WHAF in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Health; and collaborating with the State Climatology Office to determine appropriate climate change data to deliver in the WHAF. Staff will continue to support WHAF users via direct email trainings and presentations; and a quarterly newsletter.","In FY19 the DNR transitioned to version 2.0 of the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) interactive web map. Preliminary work to incorporate new watershed boundaries was completed additional work to sync products will occur when the watershed boundary dataset is published by MNIT. Other updates to WHAF website content were completed and included accessibility compliance. WHAF staff worked with interagency partners on several projects. DNR-MPCA Stream Protection Priorities were published and updated in the WHAF Map; a ‘Target’ tool was added to prioritize stream erosion studies; the State Climatology Office and WHAF staff coordinated to publish 81 Climate Summary reports for each major watershed and one statewide report. Each report summarizes the historic climate record for precipitation and temperature (1895-2018). New data was added to the WHAF online map including MPCA 2018 water quality impairments; MDH data related to drinking water; Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area project data; and climate trend data. WHAF staff provided direct user support trainings presentations and a quarterly newsletter reaching 2800 subscribers.",,,,322267,43667,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2018,318607,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY18 Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) staff will update and re-organize the WHAF website for a more intuitive user experience and to meet accessibility requirements. We will update WHAF Watershed Context Reports for all major watersheds and deliver them online. We will recalculate all average WHAF health index scores and update biology health scores. We will continue to coordinate on water quality analyses with the MN Pollution Control Agency and finalize our work on protection strategies for streams. We will develop and test the new WHAF 2.0 map application. We will update user support materials to reflect changes to the WHAF map. We will add modules for the Decision Support System to the WHAF 2.0 map. We will add WHAF use cases and user guidance documents. We will continue to assist Clean Water Fund-supported staff through training and outreach events. The interagency WHAF cohort group formed in FY17 will meet up to three times in FY18. We will continue publishing a quarterly WHAF Newsletter to support our growing subscriber list of public and private partners. ","In FY18 DNR reorganized the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) website to improve the user experience and accessibility. WHAF 2.0 has new tools including one-click watershed delineation updated land cover charts and the ability to quickly see watershed health scores for any location. The 80 major watershed context reports were updated for accessibility and posted online. Six combined health scores were updated and a new score was added for ‘Steep Slopes near Streams.’ Coordination with MPCA allowed delivery of 2018 water quality impairment and assessment data and development of an interagency process to prioritize streams for protection. WHAF staff supported users with five training and outreach events collected feedback and responded to many requests for technical assistance. Staff continued publishing a quarterly newsletter with more than 2 400 public and private sector subscribers.",,,,297495,21112,,2.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2017,301962,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY17 we will continue to update health index scores to incorporate new data. Updates are planned for the Terrestrial Habitat Quality Groundwater Contamination Susceptibility and Species Richness health scores. We will coordinate with DNR Climate Change staff to add new data for climate vulnerability work. We will coordinate with MPCA to share water quality data and model results in the WHAF map. We will enhance the WHAF map to include saving and printing of individual health explorations. We will support agency staff working on WRAPS and 1W1P as requested. The WHAF will provide inputs for standard deliverables as part of a larger DNR effort to support WRAPS development. We will continue to bring additional modules of the Decision Support System online including guides for users as they evaluate watershed health and analyze trade-offs for decision making. We will continue to develop products that build a shared understanding of watershed health concepts including: updating and expanding three to five WHAF web pages with new content; training other DNR staff and key audiences; and publishing a quarterly WHAF newsletter to communicate with a growing user base.","In FY17 WHAF staff updated several health index scores and revised the Groundwater Susceptibility index using new groundwater data. Staff continued on biology health scores and climate change and made the MN Wildlife Action Plan available in online maps. They coordinated with the MN Pollution Control Agency to provide GIS analysis of watershed characteristics for a nutrient study and prioritization of streams for the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies process. They developed and distributed to DNR staff a GIS toolbox for custom land cover charts. Staff created a web platform that allows advanced WHAF users to view the statistical relationship between WHAF health scores and the quality of aquatic communities in Minnesota streams. A new web programmer on the WHAF staff improved map functions compliance with accessibility requirements and guidelines and the overall stability of the application. Upgraded LiDAR-based topography was added to the online map. Staff developed and tested additional modules of the WHAF Decision Support System including beta testing of an online interface. Staff provided support to WHAF users by presenting at 10 training and outreach events and with one-on-one assistance. One training session was attended by 15 Clean Water Fund-supported staff from multiple state agencies. We formed a cohort of Clean Water Fund-supported staff from three agencies to guide WHAF development. We developed a story map explaining watershed concepts. We reorganized and updated content and navigation for our web pages to be implemented in FY18. We continued to publish a quarterly WHAF newsletter to communicate with 1 900 subscribers.",,,,271849,30086,,2.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2016,316000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY16 we will continue to refine and expand the suite of health index scores: update the non-point source and water quality assessments indices; add a metric of phosphorus risk; update the stream species index with current MPCA data; and calculate index trends over time. We will publish watershed health report cards for the 81 major watersheds. We will enhance the online WHAF site and map application with new functions to include: access to major watershed health report cards; health score trends over time; user selected health score comparisons; user map views that can be stored and shared; and watershed ecological context reports. We will work directly with DNR and MPCA staff working on WRAPS and watershed plans as requested and the WHAF will be used to provide inputs for standard deliverables as part of a larger DNR effort to systematically support WRAPS development. We will make the online Decision Support System live including guides that will walk users through an analysis of watershed health and provide a framework for decision making. We continue developing products that build a shared understanding of watershed health including: updating and expanding three to five WHAF web pages with new content; training other DNR staff and key audiences; and publishing a quarterly WHAF newsletter to communicate with a growing user base. ","In FY16 we refined and expanded the suite of health index scores. The work included updates to: Non-Point Source Index and Metric of Phosphorus Risk; Localized Pollution Source Index and six Pollution Metric Scores; Water Quality Assessment Index; Stream Species Quality Index and Metrics for Fish Macroinvertebrates and Mussels; Loss of Hydrologic Storage Index and Loss of Wetland Storage Metric. We provided access to GIS data layers related to each health score. We published watershed health report cards and ecological context reports for Minnesota’s 81 major watersheds. We enhanced the WHAF map so users can store and share map views and create a slideshow of maps. We worked with DNR and MPCA staff on WRAPS protection strategies and 1W1P pilot projects as requested. We participated in development of standard deliverables as part of a DNR effort to support WRAPS development. We enhanced watershed specific information such as land use summaries google earth flyovers and health summaries including expanded guidance to assist users. We completed a beta version of an online Decision Support System available for preliminary use by DNR staff. Three modules of the DSS will move to the WHAF website in FY17 based on hiring a new web programmer. Additional DSS modules will continue in development in FY17 to facilitate input and review by Subject Matter Experts. We continued developing products that build a shared understanding of watershed health including expanded WHAF web content; training other DNR staff and key audiences; and published a quarterly WHAF newsletter for our subscriber list of more than 1400 users.",,,,201865,24165,,2.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2015,258755,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY15 the WHAF team will review all 18 of the WHAF Health index scores add at least two new indices and update four to six indices using new data. Trends in health over time will be generated at the watershed and catchment scale and a web-based delivery mechanism will be designed. A decision support system for applying the Watershed Health Assessment Framework by diverse resource managers will be delivered online. Ongoing direct outreach using the WHAF to support clean water work by the DNR and agency partners will continue. WHAF program staff will coordinate with Information Technology staff to deliver updated watershed health information when new input data becomes available.","In FY15 the WHAF team added five new index scores in the water quality component ad updated five watershed health index scores with new data and improved analysis. We made index updates available to the public through the WHAF online map. The updated index scores are also available as GIS data directly for use by DNR staff and for the public via download from MN Geospatial Commons. We calculated trends over time for land use and crop trends over time (2001 2006 and 2011) and designed a way to show those trends for any watershed the user selects. The trend data is also available for download from the MN Geospatial Commons. We re-designed the WHAF online map to improve the user interface and to add new features including buttons for navigating between watershed scales. We created narrated instructional videos and other guides to help WHAF users tap into the WHAF’s new features. We also started a WHAF newsletter which now has over 1000 subscribers. We designed a preliminary Decision Support System (DSS) which is not yet ready to go online. Some products that support the DSS (including the land use summary charts and enhanced access to additional data and web services) have been developed and are available now. Members of our team took training on Structured Decision Making which provides a framework for designing the DSS. This training slowed our delivery timeline but will make the final product more rigorous and consistent. We directly supported WRAPS work by the DNR and our agency partners and the WHAF was used without direct support in a number of WRAPS – one example is DNR and MPCA staff involved in Stressor ID using the WHAF together to diagnose problems where the fish community indicates poor stream health. We also helped DNR staff use WHAF for One Watershed One Plan pilot planning efforts in the North Fork Crow River Yellow Medicine and Root River watersheds.",,,,226481,1220,,1.8,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2014,100000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY14 new outreach tools will help users apply health index scores and principles to planning and decision making. Explanatory video text and graphics will explain healthy watershed principles at multiple scales. Outreach materials will be available to help users apply health assessments at various scales from statewide to major river basin major watershed and local projects. Health trend data will be developed for several health indices to show changes in the health of Minnesota’s watersheds over time. Staff will participate directly with DNR and PCA staff in applying healthy watershed principles for 3 to 5 projects.","In FY14 the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) online web application was introduced to diverse citizen and agency audiences. This resulted in the WHAF being used for: training of civic leaders involved in watershed issues; internal DNR projects and processes; coordination with MPCA and other agency partners; and reporting watershed health status by a variety of agency and citizen watershed organizations. Resources were added to the WHAF website to ensure ease of use. Instructional videos were posted at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/whaf/explore/index.html to help users apply health assessments at various scales from statewide to major river basin major watershed and local projects. Staff started updating health scores based on the new (2011) National Land Cover Data. Changes in health scores over time are currently in review and developers are working on delivering health trends through the web application. Three additional health indices were downscaled and/or improved in FY 14 including Hydrologic Storage Terrestrial Habitat Quality and Stream Species Quality. Staff worked with MPCA to apply healthy watershed principles to stressor identification reports Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies DNR planning processes (Groundwater Management Areas Parks and Trails Whitewater Watershed Learning Center Park Plan Update Process) and water quality work for the Snake River Pomme de Terre Lower Minnesota River and Pine River watersheds.",,,,81502,1219,,1.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2013,100000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY 13 DNR will deliver Watershed Health Assessment scores and to a smaller watershed (catchment) scale to support the exploration of watershed systems at more local level. Guidance Documents will lead users through a consistent approach for applying Watershed Health Assessment Framework products. A new web interface is in development that will enhance the exploration of complex systems information for resource managers and interested citizens.","In FY 13 half of the watershed health index scores (9 of 18) were calculated statewide to the subwatershed (catchment) scale providing health scores for more than 10 000 individual catchments. A newly designed web interface released at the end of the FY13 allows users to explore health assessment scores and 30 additional GIS data layers at multiple scales. An additional online tool uses MN DNR watershed delineations to instantly identify the upstream area for a selected catchment providing summary information about land use in the upstream area. The WHAF team also completed new health assessment work using data collected by MN DNR Statewide Mussel Survey MPCA Stream Survey IBI Data State Water Use Data and USGS Stream Flow Data.",,,,144058,924,,1.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2012,100000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY12 DNR will deliver a Decision Support Tool to assist managers in applying the watershed health scores to strategic planning and decision making. The GIS Data used for health scores will be readily available to users. Innovative outreach products will bring a systems perspective to a broad audience. Data access will improve the coordination of efforts to improve watershed health. ","In FY12 DNR completed web delivery of Watershed Health Assessment scores and explanatory text. The Watershed Health Assessment Framework was delivered in a series of workshops to assist DNR managers in applying the watershed health scores to strategic planning and decision making. The GIS Data used for health scores is readily available to users. Innovative outreach products are in development that will bring a systems perspective to a broad audience. Data access will improve the coordination of efforts to improve watershed health.",,,,74542,21159,,1.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2011,118000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY 11 DNR will deliver Watershed Health Scores for all 81 major watersheds available through the DNR website including a map interface for scores supporting explanatory text and downloadable products. Products will inform managers and citizens using a systems framework to compare watershed health across Minnesota.","In FY 11 DNR delivered Watershed Health Scores for all 81 major watersheds on the DNR website. A map interface supporting explanatory text and downloadable products are available to managers and citizens. The WAT is being used by resource managers and others to apply an ecological systems approach to understand and address health challenges in our watersheds.",,,,,,,,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2010,110500,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY10 DNR will develop health scores for all 81 major watersheds in Minnesota web-based delivery and interpretation of scores 5 year cycle of score generation for monitoring trends implementation plans based on scoring.","In FY 10 DNR completed health scores for all major watersheds. The scores were prepared for release and a basic web map interface was completed. Project staff also drafted text for the Watershed Assessment Tool website and compiled an extensive literature review and supporting documentation in a database.",,,,,,,,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2025,350000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(g)","$650,000 the first year and $650,000 the second year are for applied research and tools, including maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries, streams, and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data and for assessing the effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY25 MNIT staff at DNR EWR will continue their stewardship role for Minnesota’s authoritative lidar data and watershed data, which will include: Continuing research and development on Minnesota’s new second generation, high-density lidar data. Working with the Minnesota Geospatial Information Office (MnGeo) to develop a hierarchical and seamless statewide data architecture that will provide organized data management of the new lidar and efficient dissemination of products to the public. Creation of new workflows for development of official lidar- derived 3D digital elevation products.  Key products from this work will include digital elevation models (DEM), topographic contours, and high-density Hydrographic Position Index (HPI).  These data products will serve watershed modeling needs such as hydro-terrain and landscape applications, hydraulic and hydrologic design projects, and flood prediction and reduction models. Watershed delineation updates using lidar-derived data. Ongoing collaboration and development of digital dam breachline datasets.  This work consists of management of existing data and creating new breachlines where the data doesn’t exist.   Collaboration with agencies and committees at the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR), DNR, MPCA, U.S. Geological Survey, and the Geospatial Advisory Council.   Continued leadership of 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo), 3DGeo Workgroups, and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. MNIT staff at DNR EWR will also continue to provide subject matter expertise in research and development of foundational digital hydrography data products and applications of the data for government agencies, watershed partners, and public end users.  The focus of this work will be lidar-derived hydrography.  These data are used in water quality and quantity projects to promote watershed health, landscape resiliency, environmental planning and decision making, and hydrologic modeling across Minnesota.   ",,,,,,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2024,350000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(g)","$650,000 the first year and $650,000 the second year are for applied research and tools, including maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries, streams, and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data and for assessing the effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY24 MNIT staff at DNR EWR will continue their data stewardship role for Minnesota’s authoritative lidar and watershed data. The updated watershed delineation dataset completed in FY23 will be published for public use as the DNR Watershed Suite. Staff will also publish a report on the results from the FY23 pilot project that explored the value and efficacy of Clean Water funded digital elevation model (DEM) breachlines in new high-resolution lidar DEMs. Research and development will continue to explore new workflows to create authoritative lidar-derived DEMs, topographic contours, and high-density Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) from new lidar data. DNR MNIT Staff will continue their lidar and watershed collaboration and leadership roles with teams at the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR), DNR EWR, the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) Workgroups, and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. The data stewardship and leadership roles of MNIT staff at DNR EWR provides subject matter expertise in development of foundational data products and application of the data for government agencies, citizens, and other watershed partners. These data are used in water quality and quantity projects to promote watershed health, resilience, and modeling across Minnesota. ","In FY24 MNIT staff at DNR continued their watershed and lidar data stewardship roles. This work included data research and development and stakeholder collaboration.  The staff served as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects with BWSR and DNR EWR. They also served in leadership roles on many teams of the MN Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). This collaborative work ensures watershed and lidar related data meets the needs of federal, state, and local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. MNIT staff at DNR published the updated watershed delineation dataset for public use.  This product known as the DNR Watershed Suite serves as Minnesota’s official watershed map, which serves thousands of watershed projects across the state.  Staff also published a report on the results from the FY23 pilot project that explored the value and efficacy of Clean Water funded Digital Dam Breachline applications in Minnesota’s new high-resolution second generation lidar DEMs.  These results were presented at the annual Esri User Conference in California and the Minnesota GIS/LIS Conference. The 3DGeo Culvert Data Standard Subgroup continued to work and hold quarterly meetings for the establishment of a culvert data standard.  When complete the standard will guide culvert inventories with standardized attributes for systematic data sharing.  DNR MNIT staff continued to provide subject matter expertise in lidar data acquisition and the creation of lidar deliverables such as DEMs, contours, and Hydrographic Position Index (HPI). These authoritative lidar products will serve watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, and One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) programs, hydrologic modeling initiatives, and Clean Water projects.   ",,,,282992,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2023,280000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$535000 the first year and $530000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY23 MNIT staff at DNR will continue the role of stewardship for state lidar data, digital elevation models (DEM), the MnTOPO website, and watershed data. Staff will continue collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR), the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo), and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). The Watershed Delineation dataset will be published for public use following DNR EWR approval of changes that impact authoritative and regulatory applications. The Culvert Data Standard Workgroup will hold a kickoff meeting to launch the team, followed by regular monthly meetings. The Standard will help facilitate Clean Water and hydrologic modeling initiatives. The DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup will continue to develop methodologies and processes related to hydro-modification of high resolution lidar-derived DEMs. The Subgroup will research new techniques and tools for identifying culvert locations and developing new hydrography from DEMs derived from MN’s new high-density lidar. This work will inform MN’s future hydrography development projects as well as the USGS 3D Hydrography program. Staff will collaborate with 3DGeo on implementation of the new statewide Tile Indexing Scheme in support of storage and maintenance of MN’s lidar holdings and dissemination through MNTOPO. The Tile Indexing Scheme will be published to the MN Geospatial Commons. With new lidar data becoming available in FY23 and beyond, MNIT staff will participate in reviewing 3DGeo lidar data deliverables for completeness and identification of concerns. They will serve as subject matter experts in the creation of lidar deliverables such as DEMs, contours, and HPI. The review of these data support research and development of new workflows for integration into software platforms and Clean Water programs. Solutions are being identified, documented, and shared with partners to better assist them with working with these high-density datasets. "," In FY23 MNIT staff at DNR continued their data stewardship roles. This work includes data development and collaboration. The staff served as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects with BWSR and DNR EWR. They also served in leadership roles on many teams of the MN Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). This collaborative work ensures watershed and lidar related data meets the needs of federal, state, and local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. MNIT staff at DNR held several meetings with DNR EWR and other state and federal agency staff to review watershed outlet locations and naming conventions resulting in agency approved authoritative watershed boundaries. The 3DGeo Culvert Data Standard Subgroup held a kickoff meeting to launch this new team and followed that by hosting quarterly meetings. The work on the Culvert Standard is ongoing, when complete it will help facilitate Clean Water and hydrologic modeling initiatives. With guidance and expertise provided by the DNR MNIT staff, the DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup completed the pilot project that reviewed the role of existing data developed with Clean Water Funds for use with new high resolution lidar-derived DEMs. Results were compiled and a report is in development. This work will inform Minnesota’s future hydrography development projects and the USGS 3D Hydrography Program.  DNR MNIT staff continued to provide subject matter expertise in lidar data acquisition and the creation of lidar deliverables such as DEMs, contours, and Hydrographic Position Index (HPI). The 3DGeo Tile Indexing Scheme was implemented into the lidar data and published to the MN Geospatial Commons for public use. These authoritative lidar products will serve watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, and One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) programs. ",,,,294302,7388,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2022,285000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$535000 the first year and $530000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY22 MNIT staff at DNR will continue their role of stewardship for state lidar data the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff will continue collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. The Watershed Delineation dataset will be published for public use. The initial Culvert Data Standard Workgroup will hold their first meetings. Comprised of interested parties who have current culvert datasets this knowledge base will inform development of the Culvert Data Standard. Metadata and supporting documentation for the DNR Travel Time tool will be completed and the tool will be made available to the public. The DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup will continue to develop methodology and processes related to hydro-modification of high resolution lidar-derived digital elevation models. This research and its practical applications will be documented to inform watershed delineation processes into the future. ","In FY22 MNIT staff at DNR continued collaborating with BWSR as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects, served on the MN Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo), and served lead roles on the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). This collaborative work ensures consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Progress was made on the Watershed Boundary Dataset but was not published as planned. MNIT Staff worked with DNR EWR to incorporate and approve updates that impact authoritative and regulatory applications of the dataset. Research and development explored applying new workflows to create high-density Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) from new lidar data. Work continues on establishing the State Culvert Standard and exploring the ability of new lidar to identify culverts. This initiative was strengthened by MNIT staff establishing a Workgroup comprised of members from counties, SWCDs, and state agencies. MNIT staff led the 3DGeo DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup in collection of existing breachline datasets for use in MN’s new high-resolution lidar-derived digital elevation models (DEM).  This assessment determined the effort required to digitize new breachlines or modify existing breachline geometry for proper hydrologic connectivity. Staff also worked with DNR MNIT and BWSR to complete the DNR Travel Time Tool update and published on the MN Geospatial Commons data portal. Staff collaborated with 3DGeo partners to create a new statewide tile indexing scheme for storing, managing, and disseminating lidar data and other geospatial products. Research and development work started on working with new lidar point clouds and high resolution DEM’s. Efficiencies and best practices are being documented and shared with partners to better assist them with working with these high-resolution datasets. ",,,,278558,27041,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2021,285000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY21 MNIT staff at DNR will continue their role of stewardship for state lidar data the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff will continue their cross-agency collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. Additionally staff will be working with DNR on the public release of the updated statewide watershed dataset the first major update release since 2011. A new update to the statewide Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) will also be completed for application in water resource tools and visualization assessments of the landscape. Work will begin on writing Minnesota's geospatial culvert data standard to establish a single commonly accepted set of attribute specifications for transferring and aggregating culvert data in Minnesota for a wide variety of water resource applications. Staff will work with BWSR DNR and 3DGeo on the quality control and assessment of digital dam breachline deliverables provided to the state as part of the Tillage and Erosion Survey Program and the updating of DNR's Digital Elevation Model Travel Time Tool. ","In FY21 MNIT staff at DNR continued collaborating with BWSR as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects served on the Minnesota Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and served lead roles on the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. This collaborative work ensures consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Staff harmonized the federal Watershed Boundary Dataset with DNR Catchment Dataset using the U.S. Geological Survey toolset. Updating existing Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) expanded into research using new lidar data for an updated HPI. Establishing the foundation for a state culvert standard continues current work focused on the ability of new lidar to identify culverts. The quality control of digital dam breachlines started with staff reviewing deliverables for completeness and integration into a digital elevation model that will serve the BWSR Tillage and Erosion Survey Program. Staff also worked with DNR MNIT and BWSR technicians to complete the DNR Travel Time Tool update.",,,,265810,19419,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2020,280000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY20 MNIT staff at DNR will continue stewardship of state lidar data on the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff will continue their cross-agency collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources two committees of the Geospatial Advisory Council (Standards and 3D Geomatics Committees) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team working towards publication of state watershed culvert and lidar data standards. These standards ensure consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Staff will complete three special projects: release an update to Minnesota’s authoritative watershed datasets; write technical papers to convey new findings and protocols bringing greater consistency to LiDAR digital elevation models and hydrography data products; participate in the 3D Geomatics Committee led effort to write a Lidar Acquisition Plan that strives to bring new high-density lidar to Minnesota. New lidar will enhance Minnesota's existing digital elevation and watershed data for hydro-terrain analysis tools."," In FY20 MNIT staff at DNR continued stewardship of state lidar data on the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff continued their cross-agency collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects served on the Minnesota Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and served lead roles on the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. This collaborative work ensures consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Staff completed the most recent update to Minnesota’s authoritative watershed dataset. 3DGeo Committee contributions include writing a LCCMR proposal for lidar acquisition and DEM hydro-modification completion of writing the Minnesota Lidar Plan and establishment of Minnesota’s first high definition lidar data collection under the state’s Lidar Plan scheduled for spring 2021. This new lidar data will update Minnesota’s existing digital elevation and watershed data. ",,,,261613,21052,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2019,260000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY19 Minnesota Information Technology (MNIT) staff at the DNR will continue stewardship of state LiDAR (light detection and ranging) on the MnTOPO website and related watershed delineation data. Staff will continue to collaborate with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) and two committees of the Governor’s Geospatial Advisory Council (Standards Committee and 3D Geomatics Committee) toward publication of a state standard to ensure consistent processing of LiDAR digital elevation data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting the implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. The Standards Committee will formally review and publish the standard. Staff will draft technical papers to convey new findings and protocols bringing greater consistency to LiDAR digital elevation models watercourse and watershed hydrography data products. The 3D Geomatics Committee will help disseminate this information to other Minnesota LiDAR and spatial data users. Also in FY19 staff will complete a major watershed delineation update and revision and provide related education and outreach to users.","In FY19 MNIT staff at DNR continued: stewardship of state lidar data on the MnTOPO website and related watershed delineation data; collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources Minnesota’s Geospatial Advisory Council (Standards Committee and 3D Geomatics Committee) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team; documented protocol for the Watershed Update Project; and assembled digital dam breachline data from state funded projects. This work ensures consistent development and processing of digital elevation models and hydrography data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting the implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. The Watershed Delineation Update project was not completed in FY19 as planned because the project scope expanded; it will be finalized in FY20.",,,,266557,30920,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2018,248238,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY18 Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) staff at the DNR will continue stewardship of Minnesota’s LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and watershed data holdings including making LiDAR data available on the MnTOPO website. Staff plan to publish technical papers finalized in FY17 about standards for hydro-modified digital elevation models (DEMs). Hydro-modified DEMs are needed to run models that help local governments prioritize and target watershed management projects. These efforts will help the DNR and the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) accelerate LiDAR-based data development for local governments engaged in conservation planning and project implementation through the One Watershed One Plan program.","In FY18 Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) staff at the DNR continued stewardship of state LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data accessible on the MnTOPO website and related watershed delineation data. Staff continued collaborating with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) on a state standard for processing LiDAR digital elevation data needed by local governments engaged in watershed planning (One Watershed One Plan) for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects. Staff added key technological advancements and stakeholder feedback to the draft standard but did not publish it in FY18 as planned. ",,,,239009,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2017,223000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY17 Minnesota Information Technology (MNIT) staff at the DNR will continue stewardship of Minnesota’s LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and watershed data holdings. Research and development will continue as staff work toward publishing the digital elevation model (DEM) hydro-modification guidance developed in FY16. This information will continue to support data development for local governments engaged in the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program. Work will continue to focus on conservation planning and targeting tools that require LiDAR-derived DEMs. Technical papers will convey new findings and protocols to bring greater consistency to Minnesota’s authoritative DEM watercourse and watershed hydrography data products. In FY17 the DNR river ecologist will: (1) Continue statistical validation and improvements in the coding and usability of the geographic information system (GIS) tools created for stream type and valley type classification; and (2) Begin developing a GIS layer showing completed of stream and valley type classification. The layer will be limited to places where GIS and field classifications have been compared. The goal will be to expand this layer statewide in the future.","In FY17 Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) staff at the DNR continued stewardship of Minnesota’s watershed boundary and LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data holdings. Staff continued to manage LiDAR data and make it accessible on the MnTOPO website. Staff also collaborated with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) toward systematic statewide hydro-modification of LiDAR digital elevation models (DEMs). Hydro-modified DEMs are needed to run models that help local governments prioritize and target watershed management projects. Staff finalized technical papers about standards for hydro-modified DEMs. All of these efforts support planning and project implementation by local governments engaged in the One Watershed One Plan program.",,,,388596,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2016,223000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY16 the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue to coordinate the storage accessibility maintenance and use of LiDAR data and watershed data. Work will result in efficiencies in data use tools and training. A major work product will be example hydro-modified digital elevation models and guidance for developing such models so that work with watershed models at the local level will be done consistently and improvements to the state’s LiDAR-based digital elevation model can be shared and used statewide. The DNR River Ecologist will continue comparing GIS to field classifications of stream types and valley types. When the work is done it will be written up in a technical paper. Once the methods have been accepted as statistically valid staff will work on using the new method to create a GIS layer of stream classifications. The initial GIS layer for stream and valley classifications will likely be limited by location of stream comparison reaches (field and GIS) with plans to expand this layer statewide in the future. ","In FY16 Minnesota Information Technology (MNIT) staff at the DNR continued stewardship of Minnesota’s watershed boundary and LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data holdings. Ongoing LiDAR data management and coordination continued in support of data accessibility for Minnesota. Staff collaborated with the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) toward systematic statewide hydro-modification of LiDAR digital elevation models (DEMs). Hydro-modified DEMs are needed to run models that help local governments prioritize and target watershed management projects. Four technical papers were written and five projects were developed in support of this work including a study to compare the results of different degrees degree of hydro-modification. All of this information will help BWSR support data development for local governments engaged in the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program. Other key work included continued collaboration with the US Geological Survey along Minnesota’s northern boundary to harmonize US and Canadian watershed datasets. This partnership has led to better information for watershed modeling and targeting of locations for best management practices. In FY16 the DNR river ecologist rebuilt a previously developed geographic information system (GIS) tool to help staff classify stream valley types. The new version enables staff to incorporate regionally specific data which will make the tool work better across Minnesota’s many varying landscapes. Improvements were also made in the processing speed and ease of use of the tool. Staff also began work to ensure the tool is statistically valid and began writing a technical paper about the tool.",,,,231928,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2015,190000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY15 the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue to manage the effort of coordinating LiDAR data and watershed data as the LiDAR data steward and watershed data steward respectively. Through this work efficiencies in data utilization tool development and training will facilitate water resource management and Clean Water initiatives across Minnesota. Advancements in MnTOPO including map service updates alternative hill shades for topographic viewing and advanced LiDAR-derived products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape will be coordinated and implemented by the GIS Hydrologist. The DNR River Ecologist will determine final stream type and valley type classifications derived from desktop tools as well as compare field surveyed data to these final classifications. Statistical analysis will be used to determine if there is a significant difference between classifications using both methods.","In FY15 the MNiT@DNR Geographic Information System (GIS) Hydrologist continued to serve as Minnesota’s watershed and LiDAR data steward; we collaborated with USGS to harmonize watershed delineations with Canadian data and the federally managed watershed boundary dataset (WBD). Because of this partnership Minnesota has better information for watershed modeling and targeting locations for best management practices. We continued to coordinate storage and availability of LiDAR data for Minnesota. We finished a new product called hydrographic position index; it is now publicly available for use in GIS. We also crafted a plan to support the Board of Water and Soil Resources with terrain analysis data and the use of the new PTMApp planning tool both of which are being used in One Watershed One Plan pilot programs. The DNR River Ecologist researched GIS techniques to classify stream and valley types. Using Minnesota’s LiDAR data set and other data custom programming tools were developed to automate GIS procedures. Classifications made with the automated system were compared to field-based stream classifications at select locations. The next step in the process is a statistical analysis to see if the GIS method gives similar results to the field-based method.",,,,170155,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2014,190000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY14 the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue to manage the effort of coordinated LiDAR data and tool development training and its applications for water resource management and Clean Water initiatives. As the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue developing naming and use standards for LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) data products. For example DNR will establish standards for “hydrologic conditioning” (removal of digital dams) for new high resolution digital elevation models. DNR will also conduct training workshops and webinars related to hydrology and the use of LiDAR information. The DNR GIS Hydrologist will produce and make available advanced spatial analysis tools and products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape. These tools will greatly enhance the ability of local watershed managers to “see” landscape features like steep slopes or drainage pathways allowing much better targeting of conservation practices.","In FY14 the DNR GIS Hydrologist continued to serve as Minnesota’s Watershed Data Steward; the DNR collaborated with USGS to harmonize watershed delineations with Canadian data and the federally managed watershed boundary dataset (WBD). Because of this partnership Minnesota has better spatial information for watershed management activities such as locating water quality practices and watershed modeling. As the MN LiDAR data steward and the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair the DNR GIS Hydrologist continued the work of LiDAR coordination for Minnesota. As part of this responsibility the DNR GIS Hydrologist functioned as the lead coordinator in the published release of the internet portal for viewing and downloading LiDAR data known as MnTOPO. Additionally several outreach and education training sessions were conducted to promote MnTOPO and proper LiDAR data usage. The GIS Hydrologist facilitated the development of the LiDAR naming standards for Minnesota which resulted in the recently completed overhaul of the entire LiDAR dataset. This work also advanced the writing of LiDAR standards by developing new LiDAR terminology for use in Minnesota. The DNR GIS Hydrologist defined a suite of terminology that will guide the development and management of digital elevation models intended for hydrologic and water resource applications. Advanced LiDAR derived products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape were not created because additional staff were not available to complete this work. The DNR River Ecologist began developing a procedure for classifying stream types and valley types in Minnesota using LiDAR data. An outline of the proposed process for GIS classification was developed which details the necessary metrics and protocols. Survey data from the Clean Water Legacy Specialists from each DNR region were gathered for future validation analysis.",,,,149268,,,1.7,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2013,235000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY13 DNR will continue the ongoing work of conducting watershed delineations by request and begin to coordinate the use of LiDAR data for development of the next generation of watershed delineations for Minnesota. The DNR GIS Hydrologist will manage the effort of coordinated LiDAR data development training and its applications for water resource management and Clean Water initiatives as the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair. This LiDAR work will include three LiDAR Hydrology training workshops for outstate-Minnesota over the next year. The DNR will produce advanced LiDAR derived products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape that will facilitate CW initiatives dependent on understanding the hydrology of the landscape. Finally DNR will continue its work with the USGS and Natural Resources Conservation Service and International Joint Commission to harmonize watershed delineations along the Canadian border as watersheds get refined to smaller scales for precision conservation and water resource management.","In FY13 the DNR GIS Hydrologist continued to serve as Minnesota’s Watershed Data Steward; the DNR partnered with USGS NRCS and the International Joint Commission to harmonize watershed delineations with Canadian data more accurately reflecting drainage areas coming from Canada. The result is better spatial information for watershed management activities such as locating water quality practices and watershed modeling. As the Minnesota LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair the DNR GIS Hydrologist coordinated LiDAR data development training and its applications for water resource management across Minnesota. This collaborative work was administered through 12 monthly internet meetings by a team of GIS and LiDAR experts from across the state. Additionally these responsibilities resulted in three LiDAR Hydrology training workshops for outstate-Minnesota and one at the Minnesota GIS/LIS Conference.",,,,99492,24437,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2012,235000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY12 DNR will continue to conduct watershed delineations by request. DNR will broaden the number of people using watershed data and tools for clean water related initiatives. DNR's watershed delineator will continue to update the DNR Catchment data with the last 2 years of tracked changes and coordinate the use of LiDAR data and LiDAR training as the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair. Finally DNR will work with the USGS and Natural Resources Conservation Service and International Joint Commission to harmonize watershed delineation along the Canadian border.","In FY12 DNR GIS Hydrologist Watershed Data Steward completed the delineations of 30 special request watersheds for CW work and hosted the 2012 International Joint Commission’s Transboundary Hydrographic Data Harmonization meeting during February to harmonize watershed delineations along the Canadian border. The DNR GIS Hydrologist promoted the use of LiDAR data and application of the technology for Minnesota as the Chair of the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee. This work included the continuation of LiDAR training for water resource managers in seven workshops across the state.",,,,72703,43561,,0.8,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2011,190000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY11 DNR will work with United States Geological Survey (USGS) to update the watershed boundary datasets with DNR Catchment geometry. Staff will integrate LiDAR data and conduct LiDAR training to facilitate LiDAR data utilization in water-related applications. DNR will also assist the USGS in the completion of the WBD watershed dataset and continue to advance the use of DNR Catchments as core data for the State's clean water initiatives.","In FY11 DNR watershed hydrologists completed work with USGS for Watershed updates and used LiDAR-derived digital elevation models for a detailed delineation of 158 shallow lake watersheds. As the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair DNR's watershed delineator developed and taught LiDAR training courses and coordinated the implementation of LiDAR for use in the DNR and the State.",,,,,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
25360,"Watershed Delineation",2010,180000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY10 DNR will initiate watershed delineations for shallow lakes and 2 500 basins between 50-100 acres and update 10 watershed delineations with LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and/or completed Drainage Modernization data. ","In FY10 DNR's watershed delineator mapped drainage areas of 257 shallow lakes in four Major Watersheds and used LiDAR data to complete watershed delineations for two major watersheds. This work was temporarily suspended until technology evolved to more efficiently analyze LiDAR derived products.",,,,,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,,
33411,Waterville,2016,2848723,"MS Section 446A.073","Point Source Implementation Grant Program","Reduce wastewater phosphorus discharge to 1 mg/L or less","Reduce wastewater phosphorus discharge to 1 mg/L or less",,3942036,"PFA loan, WIF grant",,,,,"Waterville, City of","Local/Regional Government","Construct wastewater treatment improvements to meet more stingent discharge requirements",,,2015-08-13,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jeff,Freeman,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority","332 Minnesota Street, Suite W820","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 259-7465",jeff.freeman@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Public Facilities Authority ",,"Le Sueur",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/waterville,,,,
34235,"Watonwan Watershed - Precision Targeting through Hydro-Conditioning",2016,52280,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Targeted Watershed Analysis","Geographic Information System (GIS) terrain analysis in subwatersheds of the Watonwan River watershed has been completed.","Achieved proposed outcomes",32300,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",129200,760,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",0.03,"Greater Blue Earth River Basin Alliance","Local/Regional Government","With the completion of LiDAR data in southern Minnesota, it is imperative to use this data as effectively as possible. In order to do so, the Greater Blue Earth River Basin Alliance (GBERBA) will contract with a vendor to complete a Geographic Information System (GIS) terrain analysis in subsheds of the Watonwan River watershed. This inventory will utilize the State of Minnesota LiDAR elevation datasets to create many GIS datasets by spatially analyzing the elevation data. Secondary datasets to be created include Critical Source Area, Specific Catchment Areas, Stream Power Index, Compound Topographic Index and Environmental Benefit Index. Multiple watershed maps to be developed will show priority ranking of best management practices and areas to target based on environmental sensitivity variables, such as slope, soil type, land use, distance to surface water, overland flow potential, stream gradient, bluffs and ravines, and erosion potential through this GIS analysis. This analysis will provide valuable data for future planning and prioritizing of projects when partnering with staff from Watonwan, Jackson, Martin, Cottonwood, Brown and Blue Earth counties, along with NRCS, SWCD, DNR, MPCA, and BWSR, and other partners. It will reveal opportunity areas to target to effectively and efficiently address the water quality impairments as listed on the MPCA 303(d) Impaired Waters List. The water quality impairments include excess turbidity, nutrients and bacteria, along with low dissolved oxygen. The precision conservation strategies involving LiDAR based DEM terrain analysis will prove its worth in future planning with conservation efforts tailored to the specific landscapes in the placement of practices within the critical source areas.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Kay,Gross,"Greater Blue Earth River Basin Alliance","339 9th St",Windom,MN,56101,507-831-1153,kay.clark@windomnet.com,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Brown, Cottonwood, Jackson, Martin, Watonwan",,"Watonwan River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watonwan-watershed-precision-targeting-through-hydro-conditioning,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No
34262,"Whiskey Creek Enhancement Project",2016,103100,"Laws of MN 2015 1st Special Session Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7","Accelerated Implementation Grant 2016: Laws of MN 2015 First Special Session Chapter 2, Article 7, Section 7","Proposed measurable outcomes TBD","This project resulted in the completion of a model and map of the 2,5 and 10 year floodplain of Whiskey Creek.","Achieved proposed outcomes",,,,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",,"Wilkin County","Local/Regional Government","The Whiskey Creek Watershed is the largest subwatershed in the Upper Red River of the North drainage, encompassing 165.63 square miles in Otter Tail and Wilkin Counties. This watershed contains the headwaters of the Red River of the North, which begins in far west central Wilkin County, an area of mixed residential and agricultural land use. The cities of Breckenridge, Minnesota and Wahpeton, North Dakota, as well as the small town of Kent are within the watershed. Land use is primarily cropland (86.6%) with much smaller percentages of developed land (5.3%), wetlands (4.1%), rangeland (2.3%), forest/shrub (0.9%), and open water (0.6%). Six different legal ditch systems utilizes the creek as an outlet for their drainage area. All six of these legal ditch systems have been retrofitted with water quality benefit BMP's that include side inlet structures and bufferstrips adjacent to the ditches utilizing previous Clean Water Funds. This project will map and model the 2,5 and 10 year floodplain of Whiskey Creek to establish vegetative bufferstrips for the floodplain of the creek and map other potential erosion control projects adjacent to the creek.",,,2016-01-22,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Bruce,Poppel,"Wilkin County"," PO Box 409",Breckenridge,MN,56520,218-643-5815,bpoppel@co.wilkin.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Wilkin,,"Upper Red River of the North",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/whiskey-creek-enhancement-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No