"ID","Title","Fiscal Year(s)","Fiscal Year Funding Amount","Legal Citation / Subdivision","Appropriation Language","Proposed Measurable Outcome(s)","Measurable Outcome(s)","Proposed Outcomes Achieved","Other Funds Leveraged","Source of Additional Funds","Direct Expenses","Administration Costs","Recipient Board Members","Number of full time equivalents funded","Recipient","Recipient Type","Body","About the Issue","Project Details","Start Date","End Date","Source","Status","Updates","Details/Reports","First Name","Last Name","Organization Name","Street Address","City","State","Zip Code","Phone","Email","Activity Type","Administered by","Media","Counties Affected","LSOHC Section","Watershed","URL","Advisory Group Members and Qualifications","Board Members and Qualifications","Conflict of Interest Contact","Conflict of Interest Disclosed" 10024704,"2017 - SWCD Local Capacity Services (Carver SWCD)",2017,112770,"SWCD Local Capacity Services 2017 - Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(o)","SWCD Local Capacity Services 2017 - [SWCD Local Capacity Services 2017] (o) $11,000,000 the first year and $11,000,000 the second year are for payments to soil and water conservation districts for the purposes of Minnesota Statutes, sections 103C.321 and 103C.331. From this appropriation, each soil and water conservation district shall receive an increase in its base funding of $100,000 per year. Money remaining after the base increase is available for matching grants to soil and water conservation districts based on county allocations to soil and water conservation districts. The board and other agencies may reduce the amount of grants to a county by an amount equal to any reduction in the county's allocation to a soil and water conservation district from the county's previous-year allocation when the board determines that the reduction was disproportionate. The second-year appropriation cancels if new buffer requirements are not enacted in 2015.","The grant targets four resource concern areas - Soil Erosion, Riparian Zone Management, Water Storage and Treatment, and Excess Nutrients - and supports increased capacity by funding expenses in the following categories: Staffing, Cost Share/Incentives, Technology/Capital Equipment, and Operations.","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 60 pounds pf Phosphorus, 55 tons of Sediment, and 5 tons of Soil Loss. ","Achieved proposed outcomes",,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",112770,,"Members for Carver SWCD are: Bob Burandt, Jeff Sons, Marcus Zbinden, Mark Zabel, Stan Wendland",0.4,"Carver SWCD","Local/Regional Government","Provides grants to Soil and Water Conservation Districts that focuses on increasing capacity to address four resource concern areas?Soil Erosion, Riparian Zone Management, Water Storage and Treatment, and Excess Nutrients. ",,,2017-01-05,2019-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mike,Wanous,"Carver SWCD","11360 Highway 212, Suite 6 ",Cologne,MN,55322,952-466-5230,mwanous@co.carver.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Carver,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-swcd-local-capacity-services-carver-swcd,http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board,http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board,"Annie Felix-Gerth",2 10024719,"2017 - One Watershed One Plan (Pomme de Terre River Association JPB)",2017,246441,"One Watershed One Plan 2017 - Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(j)","One Watershed One Plan 2017 - [One Watershed One Plan 2017] (j) $2,100,000 the first year and $2,100,000 the second year are for assistance, oversight, and grants to local governments to transition local water management plans to a watershed approach as provided for in Minnesota Statutes, chapters 103B, 103C, 103D, and 114D.","The intended outcome from these funds is the completion of a 10-year comprehensive watershed management plan.","All proposed work plan activities completed, resulting in the completion and adoption of a comprehensive watershed management plan","Achieved proposed outcomes",,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",246441,58015,,0.42,"Pomme de Terre River Association JPB","Local/Regional Government",,,,2017-06-23,2019-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Micayla,Lakey,"Pomme de Terre River Association JPB","c/o Stevens SWCD 12 Hwy 28 E Ste 2",Morris,MN,56267,"320-589-4886 x109",micayla.lakey@pdtriver.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Big Stone, Douglas, Grant, Otter Tail, Stevens, Swift",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-one-watershed-one-plan-pomme-de-terre-river-association-jpb,http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board,http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board,"Annie Felix-Gerth",2 36631,"2017 - Pomme de Terre WRAPS Implementation Plan",2017,431587,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(b) ","$10,187,000 the first year and $10,188,000 the second year are for grants to protect and restore surface water and drinking water; to keep water on the land; to protect, enhance, and restore water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams; and to protect groundwater and drinking water, including feedlot water quality and subsurface sewage treatment system projects and stream bank, stream channel, shoreline restoration, and ravine stabilization projects. The projects must use practices demonstrated to be effective, be of long-lasting public benefit, include a match, and be consistent with total maximum daily load (TMDL) implementation plans, watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS), or local water management plans or their equivalents. A portion of these funds may be used to seek administrative efficiencies through shared resources by multiple local governmental units.","This project will result in a reduction of 15,000 tons of sediment/yr and 15,011 pounds of phosphorus/yr.","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 212.5 pounds of Phosphorus, 212.5 tons of Sediment.","achieved some of the proposed outcomes",107909,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",431587,46498,"Members for Pomme de Terre River Association JPB are:",,"Pomme de Terre River Association JPB","Local/Regional Government","The goal of the Pomme de Terre River Association (JPB) is to improve the local water resources within the watershed through targeted voluntary efforts and the building of strong relationships with local landowners, producers, and citizens. The Pomme de Terre River is currently not meeting state water quality for sediment. The purpose of this project is to strategically work towards a 53% sediment reduction goal at the mouth of the Pomme de Terre River based on a Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy document. The result of this project will result in edge of field reductions of 15,000 tons of sediment and 15,011 pounds of phosphorous from entering surface waters yearly in the watershed. ",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jared,House,"Pomme de Terre River Association JPB","c/o Stevens SWCD",Morris,MN,56267,651-235-7169,jared.house@pdtriver.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Big Stone, Douglas, Grant, Otter Tail, Stevens, Swift",,"Pomme de Terre River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-pomme-de-terre-wraps-implementation-plan,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Annie Felix-Gerth",No 36694,"2017 Habitat Evaluation ",2017,84000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(i) ",,"10 restoration evaluations ",,,,"Clean Water Fund",84000,,,0.5,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources","Local/Regional Government","This program annually evaluates a sample of up to ten Clean Water Fund restoration projects, provides a report on the evaluations in accordance with state law and delivers communications on project outcomes and lessons learned in restoration practice.",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,"Wade ",Johnson,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources ",,,,,"(651) 259-5075 ",Wade.A.Johnson@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-habitat-evaluation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Nicole Clapp",No 36709,"2017 Soil and Water Conservation District Capacity Funding ",2017,11000000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(o) ",,"Proposed measurable outcomes TBD",,,,"Clean Water Fund",11000000,,,,"Soil and Water Conservation Districts ","Local/Regional Government","Provides grants to Soil and Water Conservation Districts that focuses on increasing capacity to address four resource concern areas Soil Erosion, Riparian Zone Management, Water Storage and Treatment, and Excess Nutrients. ",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,Marcey,Westrick,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources",,,,,"(651) 296-3767",marcey.westrick@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-soil-and-water-conservation-district-capacity-funding,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Nicole Clapp",No 36710,"2017 Buffer Law Implementation ",2017,2500000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(e) ",,"Proposed measurable outcomes TBD",,,,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",2500000,,,3,"Soil and Water Conservation Districts ","Local/Regional Government","Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. For grants to Soil and Water Conservation Districts to ensure compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements for state required buffers and soil erosion law. ",,,2016-12-12,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Proposed,,,Marcey,Westrick,"Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources",,,,,"(651) 296-3767",marcey.westrick@state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/2017-buffer-law-implementation,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","Nicole Clapp",No 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2025,4799000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (c) $4,799,000 the first year and $4,799,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ",,,,,,,,,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2024,4799000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (c) $4,799,000 the first year and $4,799,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","The following are cumulative measures as of 6/30/2024 Individuals have received loans in 72 counties 2,400 loans have been issued with Clean Water Funds 233 loans related to agricultural waste management 981 loans related to structural erosion control 124 loans related to conservation tillage 947 loans addressing septic systems 115 other practices Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans is $34,629,214 ",,6778024,,560890,11188,,0.43,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2023,75000,"M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","The following are cumulative measures as of 6/30/2023:  Individuals have received loans in 69 counties 2,253 loans have been issued with Clean Water Funds 212 loans related to agricultural waste management 981 loans related to structural erosion control 92 loans related to conservation tillage 881 loans addressing septic systems 87 other practices Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans is $34,629,214 ",,4501223,,,61382,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2022,75000,"M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","The following are cumulative measures as of 12/5/2022.  Individuals have received loans in 59 counties 2,212 loans have been issued with Clean Water Funds 203 loans related to agricultural waste management 981 loans related to structural erosion control 79 loans related to conservation tillage 869 loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans is $30,127,991 ",,,,,61382,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2021,75000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans On and On an individual basis, to what degree or what extent have the loans helped farmers implement conservation practices? Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ",,,,,,45187,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2020,75000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year must be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to structural erosion control Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans On and On an individual basis, to what degree or what extent have the loans helped farmers implement conservation practices? Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","As of 12/31/2020 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,065 loans totaling an amount of $27,338,954.65. The program has leveraged $40,634,600. Under the revolving framework, the appropriations have been used 2 times. By practice type: 187 loans were for agricultural waste management projects; 980 structural erosion control 55 conservation tillage equipment; 784 for septic systems upgrades or relocation; and 59 other.  ",,,,,45187,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2019,75000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. "," Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans Total number of loans issued with Clean Water funding Number of loans related to agricultural waste management Number of loans related to conservation tillage Number of loans addressing septic systems Dollars leveraged through AgBMP loans On and On an individual basis, to what degree or what extent have the loans helped farmers implement conservation practices? Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions ","As of 12/31/2018 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 1,313 loans totaling an amount of $21,068,940.59. By practice type, 158 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 34 for conservation tillage equipment, and 718 for septic systems upgrades or relocation. At this time the program has leveraged 42% of the total cost of projects. Overall, Clean Water funded AgBMP loans have leveraged $18,575,534. ",,,"The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. The MDA defines “leveraged” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project. As of December 31, 2019, the total amount of leveraged funds was $18,575,534. ",,45103,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2018,75000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ",,,,,45103,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2017,75000,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Section 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ",,,"The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. The MDA defines “leveraged” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project. ",,33288,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2016,75000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3","(c) $75,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for administering clean water funds managed through the agriculture best management practices loan program. Any unencumbered balance at the end of the second year shall be added to the corpus of the loan fund. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ","Please see most recent year for updated information. ",,,"Every loan is issued from one of five sources of funds. This includes both federal and state sources. Currently, loans supported by the Clean Water Fund must be used to implement recommended practices identified in a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan.  All other appropriations in the AgBMP account and their revolving revenue may be used anywhere in the state. The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. The MDA defines “leveraged” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project. As of January 18, 2017 the total dollars leveraged was $8,370,202.00. ",,33288,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2015,200000,"M.L.2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (c) $200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $170,000 each year is for transfer to an agricultural and environmental revolving account created under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117, subdivision 5a, and is available for pass-through to local government and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Number of loans issued using monies from the Clean Water Fund (667 loans)Number of counties where individuals are receiving loans (47 counties)Number of loans issued per category: septic systems (542), conservation tillage (28), ag waste management (96)Number of loans addressing subsurface sewage treatment-   Phosphorus load reduction (lbs), TSS load reduction (lbs)Number of loans related to conservation tillage-   Number of acres affected, sediment loss reductions (tons)Number of loans related to agricultural waste management-   Number of animal units managed, total phosphorus managed (tons), total nitrogen managed (tons) Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor progress and impact of the Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Performance Reports in 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of this report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures.The MDA's AgBMP Loan Program  provides data for performance measure EDWOM9: Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions, FM4: Total dollars awarded in grants and contracts to non-state agency partners and FM5: Total dollars leveraged by Clean Water Fund implementation activities. ","As of December 31, 2015 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 667 loans totaling an amount of $12,871,313. Ninety six (96) loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 542 for septic systems upgrades or relocation and 28 for conservation tillage equipment. At this time the program has leveraged 39% of the total cost of projects. Overall, Clean Water funded AgBMP loans have leveraged $8,134,370. The amount reported in FY 15 ($1,636,049) represents dollars leveraged in FY14 and FY15.Estimates of pollutant load reductions are available upon request.  ",,,"Every loan is issued from one of five sources of funds. This includes both federal and state sources. Currently, loans supported by the Clean Water Fund must be used to implement recommended practices identified in a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan. All other appropriations in the AgBMP account and their revolving revenue may be used anywhere in the state. ",,1350,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2014,200000,"M.L.2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (c) $200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $170,000 each year is for transfer to an agricultural and environmental revolving account created under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117, subdivision 5a, and is available for pass-through to local government and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Number of loans issued using monies from the Clean Water FundNumber of counties where individuals are receiving loansNumber of loans issued per category (septic systems, conservation tillage, ag waste management)/ percent issued per categoryNumber of loans addressing subsurface sewage treatment-   Phosphorus load reduction (lbs), TSS load reduction (lbs)Number of loans related to conservation tillage-   Number of acres affected, sediment loss reductions (tons)Number of loans related to agricultural waste management-   Number of animal units managed, total phosphorus managed (tons), total nitrogen managed (tons)  Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor progress and impact of the Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Performance Reports in 2012 and 2014. At the heart of this report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures.The MDA's AgBMP Loan Program provided data for performance measure EDWOM9: Number of BMPs implemented with Clean Water funding and estimated pollutant load reductions, FM4: Total dollars awarded in grants and contracts to non-state agency partners and FM5: Total dollars leveraged by Clean Water Fund implementation activities.  ","As of September 22, 2014 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 456 loans totaling an amount of $9,500,000. Eighty four (84) loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 344 for septic systems upgrades or relocation and 28 for conservation tillage equipment. At this time the program has leveraged 45% of the total cost of projects. Overall, Clean Water funded Ag BMP loans have leveraged $7,500,000.Estimates of pollutant load reductions are avialable upon request. ",,,,,1350,,0.5,"Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2013,4500000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(c) $4,500,000 the first year and $4,500,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $3,500,000 the first year and at least $3,900,000 the second year are for transfer to the clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,3261890,,,1350,,"0.5 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2012,4500000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(c) $4,500,000 the first year and $4,500,000 the second year are for the agriculture best management practices loan program. At least $3,500,000 the first year and at least $3,900,000 the second year are for transfer to the clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans under Minnesota Statutes, section 17.117. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year. ","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,2522477,"The MDA knows the total cost of a project as reported on submitted receipts and invoices. By subtracting the amount of the AgBMP loan from the reported total cost we can estimate additional funding. MDA defines “leverage” funds as all NON-STATE funds that paid for the project.As of May 1, 2013, the total amount of leveraged funds was $6,354,833.",,1350,,"0.5 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2011,2500000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (e) $2,000,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are for the agricultural best management practices loan program. At least $1,800,000 the first year and at least $2,200,000 the second year are for transfer to a clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year.","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,,,,2700,,"1 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3036,"AgBMP Loan Program",2010,2000000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (e) $2,000,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are for the agricultural best management practices loan program. At least $1,800,000 the first year and at least $2,200,000 the second year are for transfer to a clean water agricultural best management practices loan account and are available for pass-through to local governments and lenders for low-interest loans. Any unencumbered balance that is not used for pass-through to local governments does not cancel at the end of the first year and is available for the second year.","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information","Please refer to fiscal year 2016 for the most recent information ",,,,,2025,,"0.75 ","Farmers, Rural Landowners, and Agricultural Supply Businesses",Individual,"The AgBMP Loan Program provides needed funding for local implementation of clean water practices at an extremely low cost, is unique in its structure, and is not duplicated by any other source of funding. The AgBMP loan program provides 3% loans through local lenders to farmers, rural landowners, and agriculture supply businesses. Funds are used for proven practices that prevent non-point source water pollution or solve existing water quality problems. The program provides low interest financing for capital improvements that improve water quality through: Feedlot Improvements, Conservation Tillage Equipment, Septic System Replacements / Upgrades, Erosion Control Structures, Shoreline Stabilization,  and Wetland Restoration. This program helps landowners purchase equipment that results in less erosion and/or runoff to rivers and streams. It helps landowners fix septic systems that are discharging to surface or groundwater. It provides funds to seal old wells and relocate new wells in areas that are less environmentally sensitive. It helps landowners fix and stabilize gullies, waterways, shorelines, and riverbanks. Any practice that solves a water quality problem is eligible! There are many great attributes of the AgBMP Loan program: Loans support local implementation of conservation practices, Loans fund proven practices that improve water quality, Loans can be used with cost share programs and funds are available statewide, The cost to the state is very low, averaging less than $200 per loan in administrative costs, The AgBMP loan program is a revolving fund, money is used, repaid and used again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects to support conservation. This program bases the eligibility of practices on recommendations of the University of Minnesota, MPCA, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS), and the knowledge and skills of local government unit staff including the county Environmental Office, county feedlot officers, local water planners, local soil and water conservation districts, and consulting engineers. ","The Minnesota Department of Agriculture provides loans to local lenders. The lender is the fiscal agent, they are responsible to disburse the loans, service the loans, collect repayments, and guarantee those repayments back to the program. A soil and water conservation district (SWCD) or County Environmental Office is the local administering agency (see image under Media).Since the MDA provides only loans and the loans are fully guaranteed and always repaid, all funds provided by the AgBMP Loan Program are considered leverage. Ultimately, there are no state funds in an AgBMP loan. The AgBMP loan program does not offer grants; the assistance is in the form of a loan that must be repaid and the repayments are then reused again and again to provide a perpetual funding source for continued financing of more projects. This is referred to as a revolving loan account structure. ","As of 6/30/2024 the AgBMP Loan Program used Clean Water Fund dollars to support 2,400 loans. By practice type, 233 loans were for agricultural waste management projects, 124 for conservation tillage equipment, 981 for structural erosion control, 947 for septic systems upgrades or relocation, and 115 for other practices.  ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Richard,Gruenes,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6609",Richard.Gruenes@state.mn.us,"Fund Administration, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","Loan Process Diagram",Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/agbmp-loan-program,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2025,2000000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(e)","$2,000,000 the first year and $2,000,000 the second year are for water-supply planning, aquifer protection, and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds near the City of Warren. Provide technical support for community water supply planning upon request. Continue to populate the Aquifer Properties Database. Continue technical support for three well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Drill 16 groundwater level monitoring wells. North Branch Pipestone Creek Complete numerical flow model and develop model scenarios to support evaluation of groundwater-use management alternatives. Little Rock Creek Area Provide technical support for the Little Rock Creek Water-Use Conflict project, assisting the contractor team with model applications and data requests. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Complete evaluation of the effects of groundwater uses on selected lake water levels. Determine other groundwater and surface-water evaluation objectives and priorities. Review and compare water level data from all DNR observation wells in BVGWMA to sustainability thresholds. North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area Continue to provide technical guidance and support to the DNR GWMA team as needed. Continue providing technical support for the White Bear Lake Area Comprehensive Plan Work Group (Metropolitan Council) and the Project 1007 contamination investigation and remediation project (MPCA) through model analyses and data requests. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2024,2000000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(e)","$2,000,000 the first year and $2,000,000 the second year are for water-supply planning, aquifer protection, and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds near the City of Warren. Continue technical support for community water supply planning. Continue technical support for new well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Continue support for Aquifer Properties Database. Continue to support Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies. Drill 15 groundwater level monitoring wells. Develop analytical tools to assess water availability and identify areas that are at greater risk of overuse. Little Rock Creek Area Continue to provide technical support to the DNR team working with stakeholders on resolving the water-use conflict and implementing the Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area action plan. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Complete the regional and local-area (focused on the Bangor Waterfowl Production Area), numerical flow models. Evaluate the effects of groundwater uses on basin water levels and surface area relative to scenarios without groundwater use in the area surrounding the basins. Work with the DNR GWMA team to refine groundwater and surface-water evaluation objectives and priorities. North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area Continue to provide technical guidance and support to the DNR GWMA team as needed. Continue to participate in review of projects closely related to GWMA management objectives, including but not limited to Project 1007 contamination investigation modeling (MPCA) and Landlocked Basin Comprehensive Planning Study (Valley Branch Watershed District). "," Continued monitoring water levels in the City of Crookston well field. Coordination and technical support for Moorhead Public Services regarding groundwater use concerns. Evaluation and resolution of 4 well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Drilled 33 new groundwater level monitoring wells. Updated Groundwater Trends analysis for period 2003-2022. Continued populating the Aquifer Properties database. North Branch Pipestone Creek Developed a conceptual model for construction of a groundwater-flow model to investigate aquifer sustainability and surface water-groundwater interaction. Began design and construction of the numerical groundwater-flow model. Little Rock Creek Area                              Continued to provide technical support to the DNR team working with stakeholders on resolving the water-use conflict and implementing the Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area action plan. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Completed a preliminary version of the regional numerical flow model. Began evaluation of the effects of groundwater uses on selected lake water levels. Continued to work with the DNR GWMA team to refine groundwater and surface-water evaluation objectives and priorities. North & East Metro Groundwater Management Area Continued to provide technical guidance and support to the DNR GWMA team as needed. Continued providing review and/or technical support for projects closely related to GWMA management objectives, including but not limited to Project 1007 contamination investigation modeling (MPCA), Landlocked Basin Comprehensive Planning Study (Valley Branch Watershed District), and White Bear Lake Area Comprehensive Plan Work Group (Metropolitan Council).   ",,,,2279549,283976,,11.9,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2023,1850000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(e)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Little Rock Creek: Finalize the scenarios-analysis report and continue to provide technical support as DNR works with permit holders to reduce base-flow impacts. Continue populating the Aquifer Properties database.  LCCMR has provided funds to accelerate this program.  Existing staff will continue to support this project with technical review and analysis. Provide groundwater technical reviews for City of Goodview, City of Corcoran, and City of Rogers water supply plans. Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds for aquifers serving Ham Lake domestic wells and Blaine municipal wells. Provide groundwater technical support for local efforts to develop conjunctive use of groundwater and surface water by high volume water users in counties along the Minnesota/South/North Dakota borders. Finalize groundwater sustainability report for aquifers near City of Warren and Marshall-Polk Rural Water System.  Report will focus on local groundwater water availability, developing groundwater sustainability limits, groundwater level water level monitoring needs, and water supply resilience. Completion of nine Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) reports. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area: Adjust the Soil-Water-Budget model to improve the groundwater-flow model.  Construct steady-state and transient versions of a regional groundwater-flow model and develop a local sub-model for at least one focus area. Drill 12 groundwater level monitoring wells. "," Ongoing technical support for community water supply planning, notably for growing metro-area communities Technical support to protect City of Warren water supply through delineation of aquifer extent and thickness and evaluation of groundwater levels compared to historic groundwater use Evaluation and resolution of 50 well interference complaints in Blaine and Ham Lake. Drilled 13 new groundwater level monitoring wells. Completed 3 GRAPS reports. Little Rock Creek Area                                                                                              Completed the report entitled, “Evaluation of Conceptual Groundwater-Use Management Actions, Little Rock Creek Area.” Provided technical support for establishing sustainable diversion limits for Little Rock Creek and to the DNR team working with stakeholders on implementing the Sustainable Use of Groundwater in the Little Rock Creek Area action plan. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area Made improvements to the Soil Water Balance (SWB) model code and refined the SWB model for the BV area. Extracted SWB computed aerial recharge, runoff to sinks, and runoff to lakes and formatted for input to the MODFLOW groundwater-flow model. Constructed a regional, steady-state l MODFLOW model for the BV area and made model refinements and improvements. Updated observations data sets. Began building a transient model and local-area model focused on the Bangor Waterfowl Production Area North & East Metro Groundwater Management Area Participated in meetings and reviewed and provided feedback on technical documents for external projects closely related to GWMA management objectives: Project 1007 contamination investigation modeling (MPCA) and Landlocked Basin Comprehensive Planning Study (Valley Branch Watershed District). Provided technical guidance and support to the GWMA management team. ",,,,1234372,269724,,12.2,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2022,1850000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(e)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities and analysis. "," Little Rock Creek: Develop and evaluate scenarios that test concepts to reduce/mitigate streamflow diversions. Develop aquifer sustainability thresholds near the City of Warren. Continue populating the Aquifer Properties database. Continue technical support for community water supply planning. Continue support for the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) program. Bonanza Valley GWMA: Begin construction of groundwater flow model that incorporates surface hydrological inputs and characterizes groundwater recharge and evapotranspiration. Drill nine groundwater level monitoring wells. "," Little Rock Creek Area:  Delineated the estimated extent of influence of groundwater-sourced irrigation on stream base flow Developed and analyzed model scenarios to explore each of four types of management actions outlined in the Little Rock Creek Area management plan: 1) augmentation of low streamflow with well water, 2) wider adoption of water conservation practices, 3) replacing irrigation wells close to the stream network with more distant wells, and 4) reductions in permitted use (via targeted reductions in acres irrigated). Produces a technical a report describing the results of model-scenario analyses and how the results can be used to inform water-appropriations management. Continued enhanced groundwater monitoring, including permittee owned observation wells continues in the LRC area. Technical support to protect City of Warren water supply through preparation of geologic and hydrogeologic tools, development of a groundwater monitoring plan, and crafting water level thresholds for nearby high-capacity irrigation appropriators. 38 aquifer test reports were added to the Aquifer Properties database. Groundwater technical support for development of Marshall-Polk Rural Water System’s Water Supply Plan and Well Head Protection Plan. Continue support for the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) program. Hydrographs and trends were completed for 4 watersheds, with 86 hydrographs produced. Water use data were compiled for all 11 1W1P areas. One GRAPs report was completed. Created new statewide GIS hydrography feature class: Groundwater Dominated Lakes. Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area: Updated the Quaternary geological model using newly available well-records data. Developed a draft Soil Water Balance (SWB) model for the area.  Modeled ET and irrigation demand based on two years of reported results for an ongoing field study at the Rosholt Research Farm (located in the GWMA) using both the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and SWB. Developed a conceptual model for construction of the groundwater-flow model. Began design and construction of the numerical groundwater-flow model. Drilled 6 new groundwater level monitoring wells. ",,,,1499159,219410,,11.6,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2021,2075000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$2075000 the first year and $2075000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY21 DNR staff will: Evaluate pumping scenarios using the LRC groundwater model. Investigate water level sustainability issues near Warren MN. Continue populating the Aquifer Properties database. Continue technical support for community water supply planning. Continue support for the GRAPs program. Provide modeling support to Moorhead's well field expansion. Initiate groundwater model construction of the Bonanza Valley GWMA. Drill 12 groundwater level monitoring wells. Support Rochester's modeling and calcareous fen protection strategy. ","FY21 Measurable Outcomes: Finalized the Little Rock Creek hydrologic analyses report. Performed a series of tests and scenarios to explore the relationship between existing pumping locations and computed streamflow diversions. Added 228 aquifer tests to the Aquifer Properties database. Prioritization supports the County Geologic Atlas program and Groundwater Management Areas. Reviewed 16 groundwater-based community water supply plans. Updated well locations glacial geology and hydrography data sets for the Bonanza Valley GWMA. Completed the groundwater availability portion of four GRAPS reports. Created 87 hydrographs comparing groundwater levels to reported pumping volumes and climate data within eight GRAPS watersheds. Installed 14 groundwater level monitoring wells across five counties. Carried out a series of White Bear Lake direct-withdrawal scenarios to support determining a maximum collective annual withdrawal from WBL. Developed 2040 N&E Metro pumping scenarios with alternative water sources for several communities. ",,,,1404654,193468,,12.5,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2020,2075000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$2075000 the first year and $2075000 the second year are for water-supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY20 DNR staff will: Evaluate pumping scenarios using the updated Little Rock Creek groundwater model. Populate the Aquifer Properties database. Incorporate groundwater level data into the draft Polk/Red Lake county border aquifer sustainability monitoring plan. Develop water level thresholds as needed. Continue providing high level technical support for communities developing water supply plans. Update the statewide “changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis incorporating water level data collected through 2019. Initiate data compilation for a groundwater model in Dakota County. Coordinate model development with county and Met Council staff. Continue support of the GRAPs program. Compile existing data develop work plans and initiate construction of a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. Install approximately 20 new monitoring wells in greater Minnesota. ","In FY20 DNR staff: Incorporated 2014-2018 streamflow and pumping data into the Little Rock Creek (LRC) groundwater model. Added 193 aquifer tests to the Aquifer Properties database. Prioritization supports the County Geologic Atlas program and Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA). Red Lake/Polk County groundwater level and pumping data were used to develop water level thresholds for the Crookston municipal well field. Reviewed 23 groundwater based community water supply plans. Updated the statewide “Changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis using water level data collected through 2019. Participated in meetings with Dakota county staff to define modeling objectives. Began data compilation and model boundary development for Bonanza Valley GWMA. Checked and updated 517 well locations for the Bonanza Valley GWMA. Completed the groundwater availability portion of six GRAPS reports. Created 53 hydrographs comparing groundwater levels to reported pumping volumes and climate data within nine GRAPS watersheds. Installed 18 groundwater level monitoring wells. Developed a 2040 pumping-demand scenario and evaluated the impact to White Bear Lake. Analyzed drawdown for hypothetical Mt. Simon aquifer pumping in White Bear Lake and White Bear Twp. Archived over 700 000 groundwater level and temperature readings from Straight River GWMA observation wells. ",,,,1367151,238627,,11.4,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2019,1375000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY19 DNR staff will: • Incorporate monitoring data from 2014 through 2018 into the Little Rock Creek groundwater model. • Populate the Aquifer Properties database. • Develop a groundwater monitoring plan to address well interference and aquifer sustainability issues along the Polk/Red Lake county border. • Continue providing technical support for communities developing water supply plans. • Update the statewide “changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis. • Continue groundwater modeling with the City of Moorhead. • Continue providing technical support and review to the City of Rochester for groundwater modeling and water supply analysis. • Apply the North Metro Lakes Groundwater Model in support of the Ramsey County District Court Order and water supply planning in the area. • Initiate data compilation for a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. • Collaborate with Dakota County to develop groundwater management strategies to address contamination and sustainability concerns related to surface water ecosystems. • Add approximately 10 new monitoring wells. ","In FY19 DNR staff: • Completed the groundwater availability portion of Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategy (GRAPS) reports for three major watersheds—Hawk Creek Redeye River and the Zumbro River. • Updated and analyzed 65 hydrographs that compare groundwater levels to reported pumping volumes and climate data within nine watersheds for GRAPS. • Compiled 1500 files for inclusion in the Aquifer Properties database. • Provided groundwater technical reviews of 33 water supply plans for communities throughout MN. • Developed a draft monitoring plan for the Red Lake/Polk County area. Groundwater levels will be tracked using a combination of permittee monitoring and DNR network wells. • Evaluated pumping scenarios using an updated groundwater model for the City of Moorhead groundwater expansion from the Buffalo Aquifer. • Compilation of existing data and project scoping has begun for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area groundwater model. • Completed technical report describing construction of the groundwater model for Little Rock Creek area. Preparation of input data for 2014-2018 monitoring has started. • Continued providing technical support and review to the City of Rochester for groundwater modeling and water supply analysis. • Conducted multiple model runs using the North & East Metro Groundwater Model in support of the Ramsey County District Court Order and to investigate potential impacts by large water appropriators outside the 5-mile radius defined by the Court. • Groundwater staff assessed the groundwater level network needs in six counties and three rural communities. No new monitoring wells were added in FY19 (with this funding source). • Preliminary meetings with Dakota county to define modeling objectives were held this past year. Construction of the groundwater model has been on hold pending completion of the revised Geologic Atlas and completion of other groundwater models. ",,,,1080994,158103,,11.4,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2018,1375000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY18 the DNR plans to drill 26 additional groundwater monitoring wells. Also in FY18 DNR staff will: • Finish the Little Rock Creek groundwater model and begin using it to test various management scenarios. • Start developing a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. • Finish developing the Aquifer Properties database and work with the MN Department of Health to enter information currently scattered across numerous state and federal agencies. • Participate in six aquifer tests to guide permit staff who are addressing well interferences and aquifer sustainability issues near the city of Mentor. • Continue responding to requests for technical support from communities that are developing water supply plans. ","In FY18 DNR staff: • Completed the groundwater availability portion of Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategy (GRAPS) reports for five major watersheds—Cannon Missouri Lower St. Croix Watonwan and Sauk. • Finished programming the Aquifer Properties database. • Located and updated 1 400 well site locations in Mille Lacs Steele Cook Pennington and Dakota counties for use in county geologic atlas work by the Minnesota Geological Survey. • Provided groundwater technical reviews of 20 water supply plans for communities throughout MN. • Conducted eight aquifer tests in support of water supply issues including well interferences near Mentor. • Started groundwater modeling for the City of Moorhead groundwater expansion from the Buffalo Aquifer. • Provided technical support and review to the City of Rochester for groundwater modeling and water supply analysis. • Continued input of historical water chemistry data (over 6 000 samples) and streamlined input of new chemistry data into the EquIS database. • Initiated scoping for groundwater modeling in the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area; • Completed the initial groundwater model for Little Rock Creek area. • Completed revisions and updates for the North Metro Lakes Groundwater Model. • No new monitoring wells were added in FY18 (with this funding source) due to limited resources and the high demand for modeling and other technical analyses. ",,,,1405812,151962,,14.2,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2017,1375000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","(e) $1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY17 staff will install 55 additional wells in areas of concern or to fill gaps and replace nonfunctioning wells in the long term statewide network. Staff will also continue enhancing the processing and accessibility of groundwater network data. Enhancements will include streamlining the gathering storage and online accessibility of data for required groundwater monitoring permits in the 11-county metro and outstate areas with high groundwater appropriation volumes. We will continue to provide technical support for communities developing water supply plans. We will also continue to provide training for soil and water conservation district staff in FY16.","In FY17 DNR staff oversaw the drilling of 51 observation wells including new wells and replacement of nonfunctioning wells. This brought the number of active groundwater monitoring locations in the network to 1 035 of which 599 are measured continuously by data loggers. Staff compiled and finalized continuous records for approximately 300 groundwater observation locations. Also in FY17 DNR staff: • Developed a groundwater model for Little Rock Creek incorporating information about surface water/groundwater interactions from newly completed staff analysis of data from six aquifer tests. Staff also began testing the model’s sensitivity and incorporating recommendations from an external technical advisory committee. • Transferred all historical water chemistry data collected by the County Geologic Atlas group into the EQuiS database. • Started developing an Aquifer Properties database. • Created a GIS database to catalog historical well interferences. When complete the database will facilitate access to records about interference complaints technical investigations and resolutions. • Conducted “Groundwater 101” training for several Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs). • Provided technical support on request to communities facing water supply sustainability issues including the City of Rochester and Moorhead Public Service. • Updated the statewide “changes over time in groundwater levels” trend analysis to include an additional 45 wells (for a new total of 341 wells) over the time period of 1997-2016.",,,,1116062,145513,,11.3,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2016,1375000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","(e) $1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY16 the DNR will install an additional 50 wells in priority areas of concern and continue to refine the process to compile and deliver data. We will do this by adding a web-based input system for data from cooperators (Soil and Water Conservation Districts and Cities) and upgrade the website so the public can access groundwater data. We will continue to work with our partners at the MPCA MDH MDA BWSR MGS and Metropolitan Council to make groundwater data sharable and available between agencies. We will also continue migrating chemistry data from the Geologic Atlas Program to the EQuIS database. We will continue to work with our partners at other Agencies and MN.IT to establish shared data governance standards. We will continue developing groundwater sustainability thresholds. These thresholds will be used to identify problems that could by caused by groundwater pumping for certain lakes rivers and wetlands that depend on groundwater. When completed these thresholds will be used to help us make individual permit decisions about groundwater appropriations. We will finish building a computer model for groundwater in the Little Rock Creek area We will continue to provide technical support for communities developing water supply plans. For example we will work with Moorhead on its analysis of the Buffalo Aquifer and the role it plays in Moorhead’s water supply planning. We will also continue to provide training for soil and water conservation district staff in FY16. We will conduct nine aquifer tests to provide information about regional aquifer information needs and our aquifer test database will become operational in FY16. ","In FY16 DNR staff installed 117 wells instrumented 18 wells with available equipment and processed 196 continuous groundwater well records. Staff also completed the planned integrated data input system allowing cooperators and remotely deployed staff to enter data online. We refined the website making it easier for the public to access data and see recently collected raw data within two days of downloading from network wells. Data processing was also streamlined to provide approved and final data sooner than previous years. DNR staff continued efforts to develop a groundwater model for Little Rock Creek and involved an external technical advisory committee in the process. Staff investigated water supply issues near the City of LaSalle related to cumulative impacts from expanded crop irrigation and reviewed cumulative pumping impacts to the Union Creek watershed. The latter effort helped guide permitting decisions and identify groundwater monitoring sites. DNR staff participated on an interagency water data governance team which developed two proposals to improve data governance and sharing among agencies. DNR with support from MDH MDA MPCA hosted groundwater educational workshops in four areas of the state. These workshops for Soil and Water Conservation District staff were well attended and highly regarded by the attendees.",,,,1545948,144234,,12.8,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2015,1375000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY15 The DNR will continue enhancing its groundwater monitoring network and data management system and decision-making abilities. -We will continue development of Standard Evaluation Procedures that will be used for the establishment of groundwater sustainability thresholds and identifying adverse impacts to groundwater-dependent surface water features. -Observation Well Network Enhancement. The DNR will install approximately 65 new observation wells in areas of the state that are experiencing increasing water use or concerns about water levels including municipal water supplies for small communities. -Observation Well Network Management. We will maintain or seal the current wells in the observation well network which are not currently being used due to poor performance. -Hydrology Data Project. In FY15 chemistry data from the Geologic Atlas Program will be incorporated into the Hydrology Data Domain system to provide greater access to the data for users of the data. Data currently in paper files will be entered into databases. -Ground Water Data Website. A map-based website will be developed to provide easy access to groundwater elevation information and other hydrology data. -We will continue to provide technical support for communities developing water supply plans including the cities of Rochester and Moorhead and others. -We will continue to provide technical analysis of existing information and assessments for Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA): North and East Metro GWMA Straight River GWMA and Bonanza Valley GWMA.","In FY15 the DNR enhanced its groundwater monitoring network and data collection network by installing 165 new groundwater level monitoring wells and equipped 203 wells with devices that record water levels every 15 minutes. We compiled 61 annual continuous water level records across the state. We are working with our agency partners to develop statewide systems for entering managing and sharing water and climate data for Minnesota’s state and local governments that generate and use this data. With Clean Water Funds we developed a new quality assurance process for our groundwater level data and transferred it to a cooperative DNR/MPCA database and we launched a new cooperative groundwater monitoring website which provides access to all available groundwater level data from over 950 DNR- operated observation wells. We worked to develop groundwater sustainability thresholds which will be used to identify problems that could be caused by groundwater pumping for certain lakes rivers and wetlands that depend on groundwater. We also worked with 24 communities to develop or review and approve water supply plans. We provided training for soil and water conservation district staff across Minnesota. This training significantly increased local government’s knowledge and understanding of groundwater and highlighted the need for more resources to manage groundwater at the local level. We conducted eight aquifer tests (focused investigations that help estimate the potential impacts from high capacity pumping from water supply wells) to learn more about regional water sustainability issues. We are also creating an interagency aquifer test database in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Health which uses aquifer tests to evaluate and establish drinking water wellhead protection areas. ",,,,1246904,154895,,10.8,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2014,1375000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1375000 the first year and $1375000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities. ","In FY14 DNR will continue to enhance its groundwater monitoring network and data management system. The DNR will begin development of Standard Evaluation Procedures which will be used for the establishment of groundwater sustainability thresholds. -Observation Well Network Enhancement. DNR will install approximately 65 new observation wells in the State. These new wells will be placed in both new locations as well as in existing areas to service under represented areas and to replace damaged or poorly performing wells. Some of the wells are designated as “sentinel monitoring wells” because they provide signals of when groundwater pumping is adversely affecting surface water bodies. -Observation Well Network Assessment and Management. DNR completed the statewide assessment of observation wells and will maintain or seal the current wells in the observation well network which are not currently being used due to poor performance. -Hydrology Data Domain Project. Scoping and initial development will be completed for the Hydrology Data Domain Project. This project will integrate and provide easy access to hydrologic data used in well appropriation decisions and permitting decision-making. Monitoring information will include groundwater elevation data groundwater contamination data surface water data (lakes streams wetlands) climatology data as well as other hydrologic data. Data will include monitoring information from DNR MPCA MDA Met Council and MDH. -Ground Water Data Website. Development will initiated for a map-based Ground Water Data Website which will be designed to provide easy and direct access to groundwater elevation information for all DNR Observation Wells.","In FY14 DNR enhanced its groundwater monitoring network and data collection network by installing 40 new groundwater level monitoring wells equipped with devices that record water levels every 15 minutes. This information is used to evaluate the effect of groundwater pumping on water levels. -The statewide observation well assessment project was completed in FY14. -Groundwater Monitoring Network Enhancement - Completed a monitoring plan with locations for 75 new monitoring wells (outside of the 11-county metro area). -DNR led multi-Agency efforts to conduct “synoptic surveys” to collect water levels in hundreds of domestic water supply wells monitoring wells and lakes for the North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area in the vicinity of White Bear Lake. -Hydrology Data Project. Developed conceptual plan to integrate hydrologic data and provide easy access to data for analysis related to appropriation permit decisions. Monitoring information will include groundwater elevation data groundwater chemistry and contamination data surface water data (lakes streams wetlands) and various climatology data from DNR MPCA MDA Met Council and MDH. -Provided technical support for communities developing water supply plans including the cities of Rochester and Moorhead. -Provided technical analysis of existing information and assessments for Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs): North and East Metro GWMA Straight River GWMA and Bonanza Valley GWMA.",,,,1149106,257141,,12.6,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2013,1500000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1500000 the first year and $1500000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY13 DNR will increase data collection in potential Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs): * Complete geophysical surveys in two potential GWMAs to increase understanding of aquifer characteristics. * DNR with support of other organizations will complete synoptic measurements of groundwater levels in three potential GWMAs. * Work on aquifer models will be initiated for two areas of concern. * DNR will finalize reporting for statewide DNR observation well assessment. Public Communications on Resource Management & Sustainability * DNR will lead or participate in meetings with stakeholders and interagency staff for areas of concern where long-term sustainability of groundwater use is being evaluated. * DNR will assess the feasibility of bringing water supply planning assistance to communities (populations of less than 1000) not previously encouraged nor required to prepare water supply plans. * DNR will move toward designation of two or more groundwater management areas.","In FY13 DNR enhanced its groundwater monitoring network and data collection network by installing 65 new groundwater level monitoring wells equipped with devises which record water levels every 15 minutes. This information is used to evaluate the effect of groundwater pumping on water levels. The statewide observation well assessment project was also completed in FY13. DNR also led multi-Agency efforts to conduct “synoptic surveys ” in which water levels in hundreds of domestic water supply wells monitoring wells and lakes are measured in one day. Synoptic surveys were completed for the North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area and for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area. Finally DNR completed groundwater models in the Straight River and Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Areas. The models evaluated options for perimeter boundaries for the Straight River and Bonanza Valley areas. Geological cross sections needed for three-dimensional mapping was also done for portions of the Straight River and Bonanza Valley areas. DNR also participated on the technical advisory committee for the development of the Metro Model 3 a groundwater-flow model of the greater Twin Cities Metropolitan Area.",,,,854617,140787,,10.0,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2012,1500000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(e)","$1500000 the first year and $1500000 the second year are for water supply planning aquifer protection and monitoring activities.","In FY12 DNR will participate in or lead meetings with stakeholders and interagency staff in four groundwater management areas. Staff will also: * prepare paper files for data mining: review sort and scan 10 linear feet of hard copy files from ethanol projects and groundwater areas of interest to electronic format; * achieve significant progress with data-mining and work planning on six of the ranked groundwater management areas; and * assess the feasibility of bringing water supply planning assistance to communities not previously encouraged nor required to prepare water supply plans.","In FY12 DNR led and participated in stakeholder meetings with interagency staff cities counties and local organizations to evaluate and advance the concept of groundwater management areas (GWMA) in seven resource critical areas of the state. Based on DNR’s technical review of the groundwater/surface water resources and current and future use two areas were identified for potential designation by the Commissioner of the DNR as groundwater management areas. DNR worked with agency partners to finalize locations for 10 new observation well nests (2 wells in each nest) in three potential groundwater management areas. Additionally DNR instrumented over 100 observation wells in geographic areas of concern with state-of-the-art data loggers for continuous water level monitoring. To get more and better information about groundwater in three areas of concern the DNR along with many partner organizations completed an intensive effort to measure groundwater levels in over 400 wells and over 80 lake levels within a span of 9 days. Data mining was completed for groundwater areas of concern. DNR reviewed sorted and scanned over 10 linear feet of hard copy files from ethanol projects and groundwater areas of concern to electronic format.",,,,715316,239944,,7.0,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2011,525000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$600000 the first year and $525000 the second year are for drinking water planning and protection activities.","In FY11 DNR will work with other agencies to complete a statewide interagency review and ranking process for areas of critical groundwater use.","In FY11 DNR completed a statewide interagency review and ranking process for areas of critical groundwater use and participated in the Interagency Groundwater and Drinking Water Team’s assessment of a statewide process to evaluate risks to the water table aquifer. Scientists also created an updated statewide map of shallow aquifer vulnerability. Staff conducted meetings with interested parties and interagency staff in three potential groundwater management areas (South Washington County White Bear Lake and Little Rock Creek) and continued less formal discussions with user groups and local governmental units in two other potential groundwater management areas in Clay and Hubbard Counties.",,,,687305,32400,,5.0,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 3622,"Aquifer Monitoring for Water Supply Planning",2010,600000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$600000 the first year and $525000 the second year are for drinking water planning and protection activities.","In FY10 DNR will complete a statewide assessment to identify areas with existing and potential water supply issues. Staff will also define the scope of work for studies and monitoring for 20 communities with existing or potential water supply issues and work with stakeholder groups on the development of aquifer management plans in two pilot areas.","In FY10 DNR worked with agency partners to assess and rank areas with potential water supply issues. The team chose 20 areas (8 non-metro and 12 metro) for trial evaluation of level of effort needed to establish a groundwater management area and collect adequate data to develop aquifer management plans and completed scoping process for the 8 non-metro areas. Staff conducted significant monitoring and held stakeholder meetings to lay the groundwork for aquifer management plans in two pilot areas: Moorhead and Bonanza Valley (Brooten-Belgrade area).",,,,228781,13785,,,,,"The DNR is working with local communities and an interagency team to define, prioritize, and establish groundwater management areas in Minnesota. Groundwater management areas will have increased data collection and monitoring that allow the state and local communities to understand water supplies, uses, limitations, and threats to natural resources that depend on groundwater. This information will support detailed aquifer protection plans that ensure equitable and sustainable groundwater and drinking water use for the future. ","In Minnesota, growth in demand for water resources is outstripping population growth. As water use increases, planning for adequate water supply is crucial to preventing water shortages and protecting lakes, streams, and wetlands - especially sensitive groundwater dependent trout streams and fens. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jay,Frischman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5733",Jay.Frischman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Inventory, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/aquifer-monitoring-water-supply-planning,,,, 37438,"Bois de Sioux and Mustinka Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) Model Extension",2017,62485,,,,,,,,,,,0.24,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","This project involves the extension and update of the Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) model for the Bois de Sioux and Mustinka watersheds. ",,"Bois de Sioux River Watershed Mustinka River Watershed ",2016-11-29,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Michael,Vavricka,MPCA,"714 Lake Ave Ste 220","Detroit Lakes",MN,,"(218) 846-8137",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Big Stone, Grant, Otter Tail, Stevens, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River, Mustinka River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/bois-de-sioux-and-mustinka-hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-model-extension,,,, 37440,"Bois de Sioux River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Finalization",2017,10381,,,,,,,,,,,0.04,"Emmons & Olivier Resources Inc","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project will address United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) comments on the preliminary draft Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) comments on the pre-public notice draft TMDL study and Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) report, and produce the public notice draft TMDL study and the public notice draft WRAPS report ready for public review and comment. Conduct one public meeting for each watershed to present public notice drafts of the TMDL study and WRAPS report for each watershed. ",,"Bois de Sioux River Watershed ",2016-12-19,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Cary,Hernandez,MPCA,"714 Lake Ave Ste 220 ","Detroit Lakes",MN,56501,"(218) 846-8124",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Grant, Otter Tail, Traverse, Wilkin",,"Bois de Sioux River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/bois-de-sioux-river-watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategy-wraps-finalization,,,, 31585,"Buffer Mapping",2025,25000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(h)","$25,000 the first year and $25,000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. ","In FY25 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. The DNR will review the buffer map web applications for platform modernization and alignment, assess workflow process improvements, in preparation for a future customer service buffer map improvement project. ",,,,,,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,, 31585,"Buffer Mapping",2024,25000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(h)","$25,000 the first year and $25,000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. "," In FY24 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. The DNR will review the buffer map web applications for platform modernization and alignment, assess workflow process improvements, in preparation for a customer service buffer map improvement project. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY24 with passage of the public water inventory legislation). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,14111,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,, 31585,"Buffer Mapping",2023,25000,,"$25000 the first year and $25000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. ","In FY23 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. The DNR will review the buffer map web applications for platform modernization and alignment, assess workflow process improvements, in preparation for a customer service buffer map improvement project. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY23). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,, 31585,"Buffer Mapping",2022,25000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(h)","$25000 the first year and $25000 the second year are for maintaining and updating buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website. ","In FY22 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY22). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,12264,2965,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,, 31585,"Buffer Mapping",2021,100000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website.","In FY21 the DNR will publish another updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review. ","Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners' behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map updates were identified in FY21). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners' behalf. ",,,,2731,,,,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,, 31585,"Buffer Mapping",2020,100000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on interpreting buffer maps for local units of government implementing buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources website.","In FY20 the DNR will publish another updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). The DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review."," Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR staff reviewed requested changes and began the process of a buffer map update (no buffer map update was completed in FY20). The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations. ",,,,50710,,,0.4,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,, 31585,"Buffer Mapping",2019,100000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on buffer map interpretation to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","In FY19 the DNR will publish an updated buffer map. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will review requested changes and make any appropriate changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). Finally the DNR will continue working with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decision-making on the buffer map comment review and buffer implementation for farmed-through locations.","The DNR published an updated buffer map in August 2018. Local government change requests and the DNR’s review of special situations resulted in 160 map changes. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf. The DNR worked closely with BWSR to review buffer requirements for several specific locations.",,,,59971,11044,,0.5,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,, 31585,"Buffer Mapping",2018,100000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$100000 the first year and $100000 the second year are for maintenance and updates to buffer maps and for technical guidance on buffer map interpretation to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","The DNR will publish an updated buffer map in August 2017. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will make requested changes consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). Finally the DNR will work with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to ensure consistent decisions on the buffer map comment review and buffer implementation for “farmed through” locations.","The DNR published an updated buffer map in August 2017. Local government change requests and the DNR’s review of special situations resulted in 212 corrections to the map. The DNR worked with the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources and local governments to develop and implement a consistent systematic framework for review of buffer map comments and buffer implementation for farmed-through public waters watercourses. The map was updated for Marshall County in June 2018 to correct public ditch location errors. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically specific comments on landowners’ behalf.",,,,74821,11283,,0.5,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,, 31585,"Buffer Mapping",2017,325000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","(i) $325000 the first year and $325000 the second year are for analysis and mapping in each county related to compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements and to provide statewide coordination and guidance to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","In FY17 the DNR will publish updated versions of the buffer map in November and February. Local government staff from across the state will continue reviewing the map and submitting comments for DNR review. DNR staff will make requested changes that are consistent with buffer law and buffer map criteria. They will also update the map as needed to incorporate changes in some of the underlying data (public waters inventory and public ditch data). Finally DNR field staff will conduct detailed reviews of special situations where public watercourses were previously relocated placed in drain tile or farmed through. Several hundred of these situations were identified by landowners and local government staff in FY16 and the DNR anticipates many more being identified as local reviews of the map continue. The DNR’s review of these special situations may result in removing the state buffer requirement from the map in some of these areas.","The DNR published updated versions of the buffer map in November 2016 February 2017 and May 2017. The map was updated in May to reflect a significant change in the underlying public waters data. Local government staff continued to review the map and enter geographically-specific comments on behalf of landowners. The buffer map review application was updated to provide the decision and rationale for every change request received whether accepted for a map change or not. DNR field staff conducted over 600 detailed reviews of special situations where public watercourses were previously relocated placed in drain tile or farmed through. The local government staff change requests and the DNR’s review of special situations resulted in 1 380 corrections to the map. ",,,,287518,34357,,1.2,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,, 31585,"Buffer Mapping",2016,325000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","(i) $325000 the first year and $325000 the second year are for analysis and mapping in each county related to compliance with riparian buffer or alternate practice requirements and to provide statewide coordination and guidance to local units of government for implementation of buffer requirements. Maps must be provided to local units of government and made available to landowners on the Department of Natural Resources' Web site.","In FY16 the DNR will make significant progress in developing buffer protection maps that describe where buffers are legally required on water bodies in Minnesota. We will set criteria for which waters will be included on the buffer protection map according to the requirements in the 2015 buffer law (M.L. 2015 SP1 Ch.4 Art. 4) and 2016 amendments (M.L. 2016 Ch. 85). The map will be developed in partnership with counties cities watershed districts soil and water conservation districts and other drainage authorities. We will create a map viewer that shows existing public waters inventory and DNR-assigned shoreland classifications on the map and make an initial map available online. See http://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/gis/buffersviewer/. The DNR will coordinate with drainage authorities to incorporate local information about public drainage ditches into the buffer protection map. We will make the draft buffer protection map available for review and comments through local governments which will work with us to ensure accuracy and designations on the final map. We will complete the map in summer 2016 and provide updates in fall 2016 and winter 2017. ","In FY16 the DNR developed buffer map criteria and created a preliminary map showing buffer requirements for all 87 counties. The map was based on DNR public waters inventory and shoreland classification data and public ditch data provided by over 90 drainage authorities. The DNR developed an interactive web-based map viewer (see http://arcgis.dnr.state.mn.us/gis/buffersviewer/) that allows local government staff to review the map and enter geographically specific comments. Local government staff reviewed the preliminary map and made 2603 comments resulting in 1450 map corrections. The total number of riparian buffers mapped is 145 113 including over 106 000 miles of public watercourses and public ditches and nearly 39 000 miles of lake and wetland shorelines. The map was published on July 12 2016. ",,,,284299,33759,,1.0,,,"Governor Mark Dayton's landmark buffer initiative was signed into law in 2015. The law establishes new perennial vegetation buffers of up to 50 feet along rivers, streams, and ditches that will help filter out phosphorus, nitrogen, and sediment. The new law provides flexibility and financial support for landowners to install and maintain buffers. The DNR's role in Minnesota's new buffer law is to produce a statewide map of public waters and public ditches that require permanent vegetation buffers. The DNR is scheduled to produce these maps by July 2016. ","A buffer is an area of perennial vegetation adjacent to a body of water. Studies show that buffers are critical to protecting and restoring water quality and healthy aquatic life, natural stream functions and aquatic habitat. With the passage of the 2015 buffer law, buffers will be required on public waters as well as public ditches. The DNR will establish and maintain a statewide map that shows the waters that are subject to the buffer requirements. Other waters may be subject to local requirements identified by Soil and Water Conservation Districts. ",,2015-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jenifer,Sorensen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5725",jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Mapping","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/buffer-mapping,,,, 36681,"Carver County Well Sealing Cost Share",2017,10000,"Well Sealing 2017",,"Seal 15 wells ","Conducted outreach to 125 potential participants. However, no landowner applications were submitted or projects completed. ","achieved some of the proposed outcomes",10000,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",10000,,,,"Carver County","Local/Regional Government","The Carver County Planning and Water Management Department (PWM) has an active well sealing cost share program. Following the adoption of the updated County Groundwater Plan in February of 2016, the Carver County Board of Commissioners moved to accelerate the program to encourage landowners to seal abandoned wells. Carver County is looking to supplement existing funds, as demand is expected to increase. With this additional funding, it is the goal of Carver County PWM to seal an additional 15 wells county wide. ",,,,2020-05-13,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Charlie,Sawdey,"Carver County","600 East 4th Street",Chaska,MN,55318,952-361-1810,csawdey@co.carver.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Carver,,"Lower Minnesota River , Mississippi River - Twin Cities, South Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/carver-county-well-sealing-cost-share,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick", 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2022,205436,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3 (amended in M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3)","M.L. 2017 (e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ",,,,,,200398,5038,,,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2021,259586,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3 (amended in M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3)","(e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023. ",,,,,,254278,5308,,,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2020,609694,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3 (amended in M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3)","(e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2023. ",,,,,,589212,20482,,,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2019,622885,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017 (e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","The following measures are tracked for the Clean Water Research Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of research projects supported Amount of funding requested in research contracts Number of different organizations that acess Clean Water Fund dollars ",,,,,602230,20655,,1.2,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2018,894991,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M. L. 2017: (e) $663,000 the first year and $662,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ",,"Supported 35 research projects (5 active projects, 30 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 10 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. Below are examples of funding secured based on initial results and technology supported by Clean Water research projects: FY Project $ 10-11 EPA 319 45,600   MnDRIVE (Discovery Research and InnoVation Economy) 43,000   Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program 1,600 12-13 USDA NIFA-AFRI (National Institute of Food and Ag– Ag & Food Research Initiative) 475,000   National Science Foundation  4,300,000   USGS- Water Resource Center 28,760 14-15 MN Soybean 65,000   USDA NIFA-CAP (Coordinated Ag Products) 5,700,000   USDA CIG (Conservation Innovation Grant) 400,000 Research results used in WRAPS and One Watershed One Plan documents. Examples: Dr. Sadowsky’s work is often referenced in TMDLs related to E. coli Results from the Root River Sediment Budget have been used to inform implementation plans developed through the WRAPS and 1W1P process in Southeastern Minnesota watersheds. Efficiency values quantified through funded research have been incorporated into state supported assessment tools (PTMApp). ",,,,876138,18853,,1.2,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2017,993255,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (e) $788,000 the first year and $787,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ",,,,,,972674,20581,,1.25,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2016,1135603,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (e) $788,000 the first year and $787,000 the second year are for research to quantify and reduce agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ",,,,,,1116436,19167,,1.25,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2015,959552,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2013: (e) $1,000,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018.  ","Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and impact of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed Clean Water Performance Reports in 2012 and 2014. At the heart of these reports is a suite of quantifiable performance measures.MDA's Clean Water Research Program is reporting on performance measure OPM12: Percent of research projects meeting research efficiency goals.This performance measure was developed using guidelines from the National Academies of Sciences 2008 report Evaluating Research Efficiency in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Each individual research project has specific deliverables.According to the National Academies' framework projects are evaluated according to two main criteria:1) Investment efficiency: is the agency making investments in the right projects? Investment efficiency is best evaluated by an independent, expert review panel that uses predominantly qualitative metrics to evaluate the program. The charge of the review panel is to determine if the research supported is relevant, of the highest quality, effective and efficient.Relevance is a measure of how well research supports the mission or purpose of the Clean Water Fund, which is to protect, enhance and restore lakes, rivers, streams, groundwater and drinking water in Minnesota.Quality refers to how research contributes to our understanding and knowledge of water resources in Minnesota. The review panel will evaluate the soundness, accuracy, novelty and reproducibility of the research projects.Effectiveness refers to the usability of research results by various stakeholders such as TMDL and other technical field staff, conservation professionals, and policy-makers.Efficiency refers to the ability to achieve quality, relevance, and effectiveness while minimizing resources devoted to the project in terms of time and money The review panel can also identify emerging issues and determine their place in research priorities. 2) Process efficiency: are the research investments being managed well?Process efficiency uses quantitative measures to track dollars and hours devoted to a project. Process efficiency refers to inputs, outputs, and intermediate outcomes of a research project and overall program.Inputs include agency resources such as funding, facilities, and staff that support research.Outputs are products delivered by a research project such as conclusions, reports, published papers, monitoring data and new techniques developed.Intermediate outcomes provide the review panel tangible metrics of evaluation. Examples of intermediate outcomes may include an improved body of knowledge available for decision-making, and newly developed tools and models. Tracking Outreach and EducationNumber of outreach activities (presentations, workshops, field days, and other events)Number of educational events (presentations or outreach to K-12 students or teachers, undergraduate science classes, non-science majors, grad students, etc)Number of peer-reviewed publications ",,,,,949783,9769,,"1 ","Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2014,691070,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2013: (e) $1,000,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to fiscal year 2015 ",,,,,681867,9203,,"1 ","Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2013,1050000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (e) $1,050,000 the first year and $1,050,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016.","Please refer to fiscal year 2015 ",,,,,,3500,,"1 ","Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 1200,"Clean Water Research Program",2012,1050000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (e) $1,050,000 the first year and $1,050,000 the second year are for research to quantify agricultural contributions to impaired waters and for development and evaluation of best management practices to protect and restore water resources while maintaining productivity. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016.","Please refer to fiscal year 2015 ",,,,,,350,,0.1,"Funding is awarded to projects selected by the evaluation committee. This is a competitive process.","For-Profit Business/Entity, Local/Regional Government, Non-Profit Business/Entity, Private College/University, Public College/University","The  goals of the program are to evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural conservation practices, identify underlying processes that affect water quality, and develop technologies to target critical areas of the landscape. Funded projects provide current and accurate scientific data on the environmental impacts of agricultural practices and help to develop or revise agricultural practices that reduce environmental impacts while maintaining farm profitability. Since 2008, the Minnesota Department of Agriculture has announced 11 requests for research proposals. Any organization, research entity, or individual may apply for these funds. Once all the proposals are received, a committee comprised of state agency and non-agency representatives with expertise in agricultural water quality and quantity issues review the proposals and select those that will receive funding. A Technical Advisory Committee, comprised of subject matter experts, provides input on projects to ensure they produce relevant and useful information for a diverse group of stakeholders.   ","Goals of the Research Program Identify underlying processes that affect water quality Evaluate the effectiveness of agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) Develop technologies to target BMPs to critical areas of the landscape  Research priorities are developed with input from multiple stakeholders including agricultural groups, state agencies, and researchers.   ","Supported 40 research projects (8 active projects, 32 completed) 16 of the supported research projects evaluate practices to reduce nitrate losses. Practices include emerging technologies such as nitrification inhibitors and optical sensing tools, perennial and vegetative cover for water quality benefits or treatment of agricultural drainage systems. 12 different organizations have been awarded research contracts through the program Researchers have used initial results from CWF supported research to leverage over $10 million of additional research funding. ",2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"Clean Water Fund Research and Evaluation Program, Clean Water Research Program Funded Projects, Clean Water Research Program Request for Proposal Summary",Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/clean-water-research-program,,,, 36655,"County Ditch #6 BMPs",2017,120935,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(k)",,"43 tons of sediment/year and 20 lbs of phosphorus/year","This project resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 97.2 lbs of phosphorus and 90.8 tons of sediment.","achieved proposed outcomes",30234,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",120935,,,,"Carver SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The purpose of this project is to install prioritized and targeted best management practices on the Carver County Ditch #6 drainage system that drains directly into Bevens Creek. Bevens Creek does not meet state water quality standards for sediment. The goal of the project is to install 6 grade stabilization structures, 5 grassed waterways, and 2 water and sediment control basins that have been identified through GIS LIDAR applications and field verified along with landowner support. The project is estimated to reduce sediment loading by 43 tons and phosphorus loading by 20 pounds per year. ",,,,2020-07-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mike,Wanous,"Carver SWCD","11360 Highway 212, Suite 6",Cologne,MN,553228020,952-466-5235,mwanous@co.carver.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Carver,,"Lower Minnesota River ",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-ditch-6-bmps,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick", 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2014,2574731,,,,,,,,,,,25,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2015,2909980,,,,,,,,,,,29,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2016,2753907,,,,,,,,,,,27,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2017,2429331,,,,,,,,,,,24,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2018,2696395,,,,,,,,,,,26,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2019,2599600,,,,,,,,,,,25,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2020,2973000,,,,,,,,,,,29,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2021,3045774,,,,,,,,,,,30,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2022,3009907,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(f)",,,,,,,,,,30,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2023,2650000,,,,,,,,,,,26.5,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 19441,"County Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Grants",2024,2027047,,,,,,,,,,,20,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) offers grants to counties for Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. The MPCA will determine grant allocations based on applications review; funds will flow to counties through the Board of Water and Soil Resources' Natural Resources Block Grants. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2025,100000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(i)","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for accelerating completion of or updates to county geologic atlases and supplementing water chemistry or chemical movement studies. ","The DNR will continue to support specialized drilling at the Minnesota Geological Survey and water resource investigations as needed to enhance geologic atlases. The DNR is continuing dye tracing and nitrate monitoring, as well as adding enhancements to the Minnesota Groundwater Tracing Database (MGTD) through the contract with the University of Minnesota. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2024,100000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(i)","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for accelerating completion of or updates to county geologic atlases and supplementing water chemistry or chemical movement studies. ","The DNR will support specialized drilling, water chemistry and dye trace studies as needed to enhance geologic atlases and other water quality investigations. ","These funds were used to improve atlas products and our understanding of water quality in southeast Minnesota. Funding also supported the Minnesota Geological Survey upgrade of their geophysics software which will greatly improve the maps that they generate. ",,,,52113,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2023,,,,,,,,,31201,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2022,,,,,"After the adjusted budget forecast a portion of the Clean Water funds from FY21 rolled forward from in FY22, the DNR Atlas staff continued the unique groundwater dye-tracing studies in the cities of Pequot Lakes and Riverton in support of the MN Department of Health's Pathogen Project to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at several southeastern Minnesota locations in collaboration with local partners and MPCA to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and continued monitoring for flow, temperature, and nitrate concentrations at additional springs. The information is also used in developing the County Groundwater Atlas. DNR completed ten new traces including: Two traces with MDH at a Pathogen Project site in northeastern Minnesota Two traces west of Harmony in Fillmore County that greatly expanded our understanding of the Odessa springshed One trace west of Harmony in Fillmore County that importantly expanded the Engle springshed to the borders of the Big Spring Quarry One trace near Mystery Cave that assisted in delineating the springsheds of Saxifrage and Crayfish springs One trace northeast of Mystery Cave that greatly assisted in delineating the Meyer’s Spring springshed and our understanding or groundwater-surface water interactions there. Three traces at Bear Spring in conjunction with Olmsted County and U of M partners that have assisted in characterizing aquifer properties of the Galena Group ",,,,87030,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2021,150000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$150000 the first year and $150000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","The May 2020 budget forecast required agencies to reduce Clean Water Fund spending by $17.6 million dollars. Funding for the atlas program in FY21 was cut but the ENRTF portion of the funding continued. ","In FY21 the DNR published the Groundwater Atlas of Winona County and continued or completed data collection and analysis for: Becker Cass Dodge Hennepin Houston Hubbard Isanti Kandiyohi Nobles Olmsted Rock and Wadena counties. DNR supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information for atlases in Cook and Polk counties. As a result of reduced funding from DNR and the Clean Water Fund the amount of drilling scheduled for FY21 was reduced slowing overall progress for those counties. The drilling schedule was also negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and reduced field activities. Leveraging Clean Water funding that rolled forward from FY20 the DNR Atlas staff continued groundwater dye-tracing studies in the cities of Pequot Lakes and Riverton and expanded dye-tracing activities at YMCA Camp du Nord in support of the MN Department of Health's Pathogen Project to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at several southeastern Minnesota locations in collaboration with local partners and MPCA to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and continued monitoring at several stations for flow temperature and nitrate at additional springs. ",,,,49638,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2020,150000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$150000 the first year and $150000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","In FY20 the DNR Atlas Program will use Clean Water Fund to supplement geological and water chemistry information in Dodge Olmsted Kandiyohi Rock and Nobles counties. The DNR will publish atlases for Houston Winona Morrison Redwood Brown and Kanabec counties that were partially supported with Clean Water Funds. The DNR will conduct groundwater dye tracing studies at two locations and begin work at two additional locations in support of Minnesota Department of Health studies to identify the sources of pathogens and other contaminants in water supply wells. The DNR will also conduct dye tracing at up to four locations in southeastern Minnesota to better understand the groundwater flow related to trout streams and other surface waters and continue to five monitor sentinel springs. ","In FY20 the DNR published Groundwater Atlases for Morrison Redwood Brown and Kanabec counties and continued or completed data collection and analysis for: Winona Houston Hubbard Hennepin Dodge Olmsted Becker Cass Isanti Wadena Rock and Nobles counties. Covid-19 slowed progress on several counties and shifted work activities. DNR supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information for atlases in Lincoln Pipestone Chippewa and Yellow Medicine. Leveraging Clean Water funding the DNR Atlas staff completed groundwater dye tracing studies at McCarthy Beach State Park and YMCA Camp du Nord in support of a Minnesota Department of Health effort to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. DNR Atlas staff also began work on dye trace studies in support of the pathogen project in cities of Pequot Lakes and Riverton. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at several southeastern Minnesota locations to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and continued monitoring at several stations for flow temperature and nitrate at additional springs. ",,,,113913,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2019,125000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$125000 the first year and $125000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","In FY19 DNR will use Clean Water Fund to supplement geological and water chemistry information in Aitkin Olmsted and Steele counties. The DNR will publish atlases for Houston Meeker Morrison and Washington counties that were partially supported with Clean Water Funds. DNR will conduct groundwater dye tracing studies at two locations in support of Minnesota Department of Health studies to identify the sources of contaminants in water supply wells. DNR will also conduct dye tracing at two locations in southeastern Minnesota to better understand the groundwater flow related to trout streams and other surface waters. ","In FY19 the DNR published Groundwater Atlases for Washington and Meeker counties and continued or completed data collection and analysis for eight others: Hubbard Hennepin Dodge Olmsted Becker Cass Morrison and Wadena. We supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information in Aitkin Steele St. Louis Lake Dakota Pennington Otter Tail and Lac Qui Parle. Leveraging Clean Water funding the DNR Atlas staff continued a groundwater dye tracing study at McCarthy Beach State Park and began a study at YMCA Camp du Nord near Ely in support of a Minnesota Department of Health effort to identify the source of pathogens and other contaminants in nearby water supply wells. The DNR Atlas staff also completed dye tracing at four southeastern Minnesota locations to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters and established continuous monitoring stations for flow temperature and nitrate at three additional springs.",,,,114205,10109,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2018,125000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$125000 the first year and $125000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","In FY18 the DNR will publish atlases for Houston Meeker Morrison Sherburne and Wright counties and complete data analysis and draft text and figures for six others: Brown Kanabec Redwood Wadena Washington and Winona. We will support completion of special high-quality drilling and coring by the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) in Kandiyohi Rock and Nobles counties to obtain detailed geologic mapping data for Part A of new atlases. ","In FY18 the DNR published Part B atlases for Clay Sherburne and Wright counties and completed data collection and analysis for eight others: Becker Cass Houston Isanti Meeker Morrison Wadena and Washington. We supported special high-quality drilling and coring to obtain detailed geologic information in Dodge Kandiyohi Nobles and Rock counties. DNR staff completed a groundwater dye tracing study at McCarthy Beach State Park in support of a Minnesota Department of Health effort to identify the source of contaminants in nearby water supply wells. DNR also completed dye tracing at three southeastern Minnesota locations to understand the groundwater sources of trout streams and other surface waters.",,,,120045,12700,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2017,250000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","(h) $250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","In FY17 the DNR will publish atlases for Anoka Nicollet Sibley Renville and Clay counties and complete data analysis and draft text and figures for six others: Houston Meeker Morrison Sherburne Winona and Wright. We will continue building on Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) work in Part A of each atlas by acquiring detailed subsurface geologic data to better interpret existing well logs. We will also continue supporting MGS efforts to provide access to legacy atlas data and related MGS databases which helps us develop Part B of each atlas.","In FY17 DNR published Part B atlases for Anoka Nicollet Sibley and Renville counties and completed data analysis and draft text and figures for six others: Clay Houston Meeker Morrison Sherburne and Wright. We supported the completion of special high-quality drilling and coring by the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) in Cass Hubbard and Isanti counties to obtain detailed geologic mapping data for Part A of new atlases. We also continued to support the acquisition of legacy atlas data and related MGS databases.",,,,426559,33338,,3.3,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2016,250000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","(h) $250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases.","The DNR will complete atlases for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties. Here is a summary of our goals for each county active in the atlas program in FY2016: Clay: finish collecting expanded samples. Renville: finish collecting expanded samples and continue analyzing data and writing the report. Houston: finish collecting expanded field data; start analyzing data. Winona and Morrison: start collecting expanded field data; start analyzing data. Anoka Sherburne and Wright: continue analyzing data and writing reports. We will continue to use Clean Water Funds to build on the work by MGS in Part A of each atlas with scientific boreholes as described in the FY15 outcomes. We will also use Clean Water Funds to support MGS’s work to provide access to legacy atlas data and related MGS databases which help us develop Part B of each atlas. ","In FY16 the DNR completed the Blue Earth County atlas began the final internal and external review of the Nicollet and Sibley County atlases and made substantial progress on atlases for eight other counties. Specifically we completed data collection and continued analyzing data and writing reports for Anoka Sherburne Renville and Wright; we finished collecting expanded samples for Clay and Houston and started analyzing data for the latter; and we started collecting and analyzing expanded field data for Winona and Morrison. Also in FY16 we continued building on Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) work in Part A of each atlas and supported MGS efforts to provide access to legacy atlas data and related MGS databases. This helps us develop Part B of each atlas.",,,,515953,26915,,4.1,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2015,615000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$615000 the first year and $615000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","In FY15 the DNR will complete atlases for Chisago Blue Earth and Anoka counties. We will also finish expanded field data collection for Sherburne Wright and Renville counties. Data analysis and report preparation will continue for Nicollet and Sibley counties. Data analysis will be initiated for Sherburne Wright and Renville counties. We may start data collection in Clay county. Funds will also be used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases. Funds will be used to complete data acquisition at the research borehole installed at Afton State Park and properly seal the borehole.","In FY15 DNR County Geologic Atlas staff completed the Chisago County Geologic Atlas Part B. We continued to work on the atlases Blue Earth Nicollet Sibley Renville Clay Anoka Wright and Sherburne counties. The following is a status report for FY2015 for each active county atlas: Blue Earth Nicollet Sibley Anoka: in data analysis and report preparation stage. Renville: collecting and analyzing data. Clay: started collecting data. Wright: data collection complete; in data analysis and report preparation stage. Sherburne: entered data analysis stage We used Clean Water Funds to expand the number of groundwater samples collected for each atlas project. We expanded work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes which allowed us to get detailed subsurface geologic data. This data helps us better interpret existing well logs from Part A atlases. We also used funds to finish collecting data at the research borehole installed at Afton State Park and then to properly seal the borehole. Compared to planned outcomes for FY15 we finished most of the work we planned to do except the completion of atlases for Blue Earth and Anoka counties. The Blue Earth atlas Part B is in final draft; we continue to work on the Anoka report. We also made significant progress on the Nicollet and Sibley atlases. We did not finish collecting data for Renville County because of the laboratory data was not delivered on time but it is scheduled for the first quarter of FY16. ",,,,602706,73033,,3.4,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2014,615000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(h)","$615000 the first year and $615000 the second year are for developing county geologic atlases. ","In FY14 DNR will complete atlases for Carver and Chisago counties. DNR will also finish expanded field data collection for Anoka County. Data analysis and report preparation will continue for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties and continue or initiate data analysis for the Anoka County atlas. DNR will start data collection in Renville Wright and Sherburne counties. Vacancies will be filled and progress made on the hiring of positions for the expanded staffing level. Funds will also be used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases.","In FY14 DNR completed the County Geologic Atlas (Part B) for Carver County with the Chisago County Geologic Atlas (Part B) in final editing (publication expected September). Report preparation is underway for the Anoka County Geologic Atlas (Part B) with a draft completed. A Science Report Lead and an Editor were hired in the second half of FY14. The editor position had been vacant for about a year which delayed report preparation. The science report lead is a new position as team lead for the geographic information system (GIS)/cartography-maps/editing staff working together on atlas reports. Data analysis continued for Nicollet and Sibley counties but at a low level due to a staff vacancy. Final report preparation continued for the Blue Earth atlas. Field data collection was completed and data analysis started for Anoka county. New field data collection was initiated for Sherburne and Wright counties. Funds were used to expand the number of groundwater samples collected for each atlas project. Funds were used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases. Funds were also used to conduct scientific data acquisition at a research borehole installed at Afton State Park. ",,,,404825,50987,,3.9,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2013,,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","In FY13 DNR will complete atlases for Carver McLeod and Chisago counties. DNR will also finish expanded field data collection for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties and continue or initiate data analysis for those three atlases. Funds will also be used to expand work by the MGS to drill scientific boreholes to acquire detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases.","In FY13 DNR completed County Geologic Atlases (Part B) for McLeod county. Data analysis and report preparation was initiated or continued for Carver Chisago Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley counties. Field data collection was completed for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley. No new field data collection was initiated for additional counties. Work was delayed because of understaffing due to vacancies; three atlas staff took promotions to other units or agencies. The MGS drilled several scientific boreholes for detailed subsurface geologic data to improve interpretation of existing well logs for Part A atlases.",,,,106184,,,0.5,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2012,,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","In FY 12 DNR will complete four atlases (Benton Carver McLeod Chisago) and begin data collection and analysis on three additional counties (Blue Earth Nicollet Sibley). "," In FY12 DNR completed the Benton County Geologic Atlas (Part B); data analysis and report preparation continued for Carver McLeod and Chisago Counties. Field data collection was initiated for Blue Earth Nicollet and Sibley Counties.",,,,23350,,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2011,,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","In FY10 and 11 DNR will complete two atlases for each fiscal year.","In FY11 DNR completed the Carlton County Geologic Atlas (Part B). DNR also collected field data for Atlases in Benton Carver McLeod and Chisago Counties and continued data analysis and began report production for the Atlases in Benton and Chisago Counties.",,,,243388,32400,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 3616,"County Geologic Atlases (Part B - Groundwater)",2010,1000000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$500000 the first year and $500000 the second year are to investigate physical and recharge characteristics as part of the collection and interpretation of subsurface geological information and acceleration of the county geologic atlas program. This appropriation represents a continuing effort to complete the county geologic atlases throughout the state in order to provide information and assist in planning for the sustainable use of groundwater and surface water that does not harm ecosystems degrade water quality or compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This appropriation is available until December 31 2014.","DNR will complete two atlases for each fiscal year.","In FY 10 DNR completed the Todd County Geologic Atlas Part B. Clean Water funding is used to improve the quality of County Geologic Atlases by collecting additional subsurface geologic samples expanding the number of sites sampled for water chemistry starting the process of installing a research well to collect stratified groundwater data from multiple aquifers and purchasing and repairing equipment.",,,,26705,30000,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) to convey valuable geologic and groundwater information and interpretations to government units at all levels, but particularly to local governments, private organizations and citizens. The MGS focuses on geology (Part A reports) and DNR focuses on groundwater (Part B reports). These provide useful information for projects completed by community planners, industry, agriculture, citizens and state agencies related to groundwater. The reports are routinely used to make informed decisions for projects related to water, natural resources, and land-use planning. Typical applications include long-term water supply planning and well construction design, wellhead protection planning, groundwater modeling, identification of valuable natural resources and planning for their use and protection, planning for landfills, septic systems, industrial sites and feedlots, emergency response to contaminate releases, and community education. When completed, the atlas is an economic benefit for a county and its communities. The DNR Atlas Program also completes specialty studies including groundwater dye tracing, monitoring sentinel springs, and projects to find the source of pathogens in groundwater and public water supplies. ","Approximately 75 percent of Minnesotans get their water for drinking and other needs from groundwater. A stable, long-term and reliable source of high quality groundwater is an economic benefit to communities. An atlas provides detailed information about an area's groundwater that helps communities find reliable water sources and manage them to maintain availability and quality for generations. Without informed water supply planning, groundwater pumping or land-use changes could impact public water quality and availability and degrade surface waters (wetlands, lakes, rivers, and unique resources such as trout streams and fens). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Paul,Putzier,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5692",paul.putzier@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Inventory, Mapping, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/county-geologic-atlases-part-b-groundwater-0,,,, 37632,"Crow and Sauk Rivers Watershed Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) Revision",2017,80038,,,,,,,,,,,0.28,"Tetra Tech","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project will conduct a 2017 revision of the South Fork Crow River, North Fork Crow River and Sauk River Watershed Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) models and review of the Pine River Watershed HSPF model. ",,"South Fork Crow River Watershed North Fork Crow River Watershed Pine River Watershed ",2016-11-15,2018-01-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Aitkin, Carver, Cass, Crow Wing, Douglas, Hennepin, Hubbard, Kandiyohi, McLeod, Meeker, Pope, Renville, Sibley, Stearns, Todd, Wright",,"North Fork Crow River, Pine River, Sauk River, South Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/crow-and-sauk-rivers-watershed-hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-revision-0,,,, 36656,"Crow River Gully Stabilization to Reduce Turbidity Phase Three",2017,189750,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(b) ","$10,187,000 the first year and $10,188,000 the second year are for grants to protect and restore surface water and drinking water; to keep water on the land; to protect, enhance, and restore water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams; and to protect groundwater and drinking water, including feedlot water quality and subsurface sewage treatment system projects and stream bank, stream channel, shoreline restoration, and ravine stabilization projects. The projects must use practices demonstrated to be effective, be of long-lasting public benefit, include a match, and be consistent with total maximum daily load (TMDL) implementation plans, watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS), or local water management plans or their equivalents. A portion of these funds may be used to seek administrative efficiencies through shared resources by multiple local governmental units.","315 tons of sediment/year and 350 lbs of phosphorus/year","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 248.87 pounds of Phosphorus, 165.69 tons of Sediment, 270.94 tons of Soil Loss. This was also completed Elfmann's Basins - Wright SWCD: Three water and sediment control basins were installed as designed. ","Achieved most proposed outcomes",148025,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",189750,7389,"Members for Wright SWCD are: Chris Uecker, Duane Dahlman, Mark Mcnamara, Mary Wetter, Michael Zieska",0.21,"Wright SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Wright Soil and Water Conservation District has partnered with the Crow River Organization of Water and the Natural Resources Conservation Service on phase three of a comprehensive sediment reduction project that focuses on stabilizing seven of the most active gully erosion sites on the North Fork Crow River. These seven areas were chosen due to the high level of turbidity and low dissolved oxygen within that stretch of the North Fork Crow River, which has led to biological and turbidity impairments. This project will drastically reduce the amount of sediment and phosphorus being exported from this targeted stretch of the Crow River. ",,,2017-01-26,2019-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Luke,Johnson,"Wright SWCD","311 Brighton Ave S Ste C",Buffalo,MN,55313,763-682-1970,luke.johnson@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Wright,,"North Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/crow-river-gully-stabilization-reduce-turbidity-phase-three,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board ","Annie Felix-Gerth ", 36602,"Developing Indices of Streamflow Alteration",2016,75000,,,,,,,,,,,.72,"US Geological Survey","Federal Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has identified streamflow alteration as a key stressor on aquatic life, but the characteristics of streamflow alteration acting as stressors have not been identified in the MPCA Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) process. Without indices that characterize streamflow alteration, the MPCA cannot quantitatively associate metrics of aquatic life condition to streamflow alteration. The lack of quantifiable indices limits the ability of the MPCA to assess environmental streamflow needs for streams and rivers throughout Minnesota. The project will develop relationships between streamflow and biological data metrics for use in evaluating streamflow alteration as a stressor on aquatic life in rivers and streams in Minnesota. ",,,2016-04-20,2018-01-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Mary Jo",Sager,"US Geological Survey","2280 Woodale Dr ","Mounds View",MN,55112,"(651) 783-3120",,Research,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/developing-indices-streamflow-alteration,,,, 36602,"Developing Indices of Streamflow Alteration",2017,75000,,,,,,,,,,,.72,"US Geological Survey","Federal Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has identified streamflow alteration as a key stressor on aquatic life, but the characteristics of streamflow alteration acting as stressors have not been identified in the MPCA Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) process. Without indices that characterize streamflow alteration, the MPCA cannot quantitatively associate metrics of aquatic life condition to streamflow alteration. The lack of quantifiable indices limits the ability of the MPCA to assess environmental streamflow needs for streams and rivers throughout Minnesota. The project will develop relationships between streamflow and biological data metrics for use in evaluating streamflow alteration as a stressor on aquatic life in rivers and streams in Minnesota. ",,,2016-04-20,2018-01-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,"Mary Jo",Sager,"US Geological Survey","2280 Woodale Dr ","Mounds View",MN,55112,"(651) 783-3120",,Research,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/developing-indices-streamflow-alteration,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2022,1200000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,200,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found or anticipated to be found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist and for the department's laboratory to analyze for these contaminants. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2021,1200000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,200,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found or anticipated to be found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist and for the department's laboratory to analyze for these contaminants ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2020,1700000,"2019 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 2, Article 1, Section 8","$1,700,000 the first year and $1,700,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, for improving the department's capacity to monitor the water quality of drinking water sources and to develop interventions to improve water quality, and for the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. Of this amount, $400,000 the first year and $400,000 the second year are for the commissioner to work in cooperation with the commissioners of agriculture, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and natural resources to sample surface water and groundwater, including drinking water sources, and for an assessment to evaluate potential risks from microplastics and nanoplastics and identify appropriate follow-up actions. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Initiative reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Public information sheets are created for both chemicals that have completed screening and chemicals that have published guidance and are made available on the Minnesota Department of Health website. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2019,1100000,"2017 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 17, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100, the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Initiative reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Public information sheets are created for both chemicals that have completed screening and chemicals that have published guidance and are made available on the Minnesota Department of Health website. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2018,1100000,"2017 Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 17, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100, the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Initiative reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Public information sheets are created for both chemicals that have completed screening and chemicals that have published guidance and are made available on the Minnesota Department of Health website. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2017,1100000,"Minnesota Session Law, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. ","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Screening Profiles are created for screening chemicals and Information Sheets are created for chemicals with published guidance. These resources for stakeholders are available at: http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/risk/guidance/dwec/chemunderrev.html. ",,,,,,,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2016,1100000,"Minnesota Session Law, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 8(a)","$1,100,000 the first year and $1,100,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits and improving capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants. The commissioner shall contract with the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota to provide an independent review of the department's drinking water contaminants of emerging concern program. The review must include an assessment of the process used by the department to rank contaminants that are threats to drinking water supplies and include a comparison of efforts at the department with efforts by other states and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The review must be submitted to the Clean Water Council and the chairs and ranking minority members of the House of Representatives and Senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources by June 1, 2016.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. Screening Profiles are created for screening chemicals and Information Sheets are created for chemicals with published guidance. These resources for stakeholders are available at: http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/risk/guidance/dwec/chemunderrev.html. ","At the close of 2016, the Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program has screened approximately 12 contaminants. Published health-based has been completed for four contaminants: - 17alpha Ethinylestradiol - Mestranol - Dichlorofluoromethane (Freon 21) - Microcystin Guidance for an additional three contaminants is currently pending. The MDH Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program is on track to meet the goals for screening and guidance development for the 2016-2017 biennium. ",,,,,,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2015,1150000,"Minnesota Session Law, Article 2, Section 8 (a) ","$1,150,000 the first year and $1,150,000 the second are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits, including triclosan, and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,9.5,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2014,1150000,"Minnesota Session Law, Article 2, Section 8 (a) ","$1,150,000 the first year and $1,150,000 the second are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standards exist, including accelerating the development of health risk limits, including triclosan, and improving the capacity of the department's laboratory to analyze unregulated contaminants.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,9.5,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2013,1020000,"Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 6, Article 2, Section 8 (a)","$1,020,000 the first year and $1,020,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2012,1020000,"Minnesota Session Laws, Chapter 6, Article 2, Section 8 (a)","$1,020,000 the first year and $1,020,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2011,744717,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (b)","$445,000 the first year and $890,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists. The commissioner shall characterize and issue health-based guidance for three or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2010, and seven or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2011.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 662,"Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program ",2010,250291,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (b)","$445,000 the first year and $890,000 the second year are for addressing public health concerns related to contaminants found in Minnesota drinking water for which no health-based drinking water standard exists. The commissioner shall characterize and issue health-based guidance for three or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2010, and seven or more additional unregulated drinking water contaminants in fiscal year 2011.","The Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program reviews and evaluates available information for at least 20 contaminants (screening and ranking) and completes risk assessments for 10 contaminants, resulting in published health-based guidance. ",,,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) program identifies environmental contaminants for which current health-based standards currently do not exist or need to be updated, investigate the potential for human exposure to these chemicals, and develop guidance values for drinking water. Contaminants evaluated by CEC staff include contaminants that have been released or detected in Minnesota waters (surface water and groundwater) or that have the potential to migrate to or be detected in Minnesota waters. The CEC program also delivers useful information on contaminants of emerging concern to interested individuals and groups both inside and outside of state government, so that appropriate action may be taken, as applicable, to prevent these contaminants from endangering public health. ",,,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,"Review of the Minnesota Department of Health Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program Process for Selecting Chemicals, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern Program: 2012-2013 Biennium, Interim Report (August 2012), Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: Biennial Report Fiscal Years 2010-2011, Drinking Water Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CEC) Program: 2010-2011 Biennium, Interim Report","Health Risk Assessment Unit",,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,651-201-4899,health.risk@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Cedar River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, East Fork Des Moines River, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Lake Superior - North, Lake Superior - South, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Little Fork River, Little Sioux River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Des Moines River , Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - La Crescent, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Reno, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mississippi River - Winona, Mustinka River, Nemadji River, North Fork Crow River, Otter Tail River, Pine River, Pomme de Terre River, Rainy River - Baudette, Rainy River - Black River, Rainy River - Headwaters, Rainy River - Rainy Lake, Rapid River, Red Lake River, Red River of the North - Grand Marais Creek, Red River of the North - Marsh River, Red River of the North - Sandhill River, Red River of the North - Tamarac River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Shell Rock River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper Big Sioux River, Upper Iowa River, Upper Red River of the North, Upper St. Croix River, Upper Wapsipinicon River, Upper/Lower Red Lake, Vermilion River, Watonwan River, Wild Rice River, Winnebago River, Zumbro River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/drinking-water-contaminants-emerging-concern-program,,,, 37414,"Enhancement of HSPEXP+ tool and 2016 Model Review Meeting",2017,49981,,,,,,,,,,,0.15,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The contractor will add more functionality to HSPEXP+ Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) tool and conduct 2016 HSPF Modeling Contractors Meeting ",,,2016-09-02,2017-03-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/enhancement-hspexp-tool-and-2016-model-review-meeting,,,, 37446,"Enhancement of the Expert System for Calibration of HSPF (HSPEXP+)",2017,42152,,,,,,,,,,,0.14,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to enhance the current version of the Enhanced Expert System for Calibration of HSPF (HSPEXP+) so that it can more easily and quickly be used for hydrology calibration, water quality calibration, generate reports and graphs. ",,,2017-01-25,2017-08-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Charles,Regan,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/enhancement-expert-system-calibration-hspf-hspexp,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2025,545000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(c); M.L. 2024, Ch. 106, Article 2, Section 5","M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(c): $455,000 the first year and $455,000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants, including PFAS compounds, and monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. M.L. 2024, Ch. 106, Article 2, Section 5: $90,000 the second year is for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants, including PFAS compounds, and monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. This appropriation is added to the appropriation in Laws 2023, chapter 40, article 2, section 5, paragraph (c). ","In FY25, the DNR will collect fish from 130 waterbodies. Resulting sampling data will be used to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. 30 of the FY25 waterbodies were selected to overlap with a MNDNR study of zebra mussel infested walleye fisheries. Overlap of contaminants sampling with this study will help investigate the potential for increased mercury bioaccumulation in infested waters which is an emerging concern. The remaining 100 waterbody samples will consist of multiple fish species of size classes relevant to human consumption. 50 of the FY24 waterbodies will also be analyzed for PFAS. 9 river sites will also be analyzed for PCBs.   ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2024,455000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(c)","$455,000 the first year and $455,000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants, including PFAS compounds, and monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. "," In FY24 the DNR will collect fish from 130 waterbodies. Resulting sampling data will be used to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. 23 of the FY24 waterbodies were selected to overlap with a MNDNR study of zebra mussel infested walleye fisheries. Overlap of contaminants sampling with this study will help investigate the potential for increased mercury bioaccumulation in infested waters which is an emerging concern. The remaining 107 waterbody samples will consist of multiple fish species of size classes relevant to human consumption. 38 of the FY24 waterbodies will also be analyzed for PFAS. 4 of these sites will be used to compare transcriptome differences between fish in high and low PFAS concentration waters. 3 river sites will also be analyzed for PCBs. ","In FY24, the DNR collected and tested fish samples from a total of 130 waterbodies for contaminants testing. Each waterbody sample consisted of multiple fish species. Fish species and size classes’ samples were relevant to human consumption. An average of 20 fish were sampled for each waterbody with a total of 2,205 fish tested for mercury, 40 fish tested for PCBs, and 493 fish were tested for PFAS. Contaminant data were collected, processed, and delivered to MPCA partners to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends.   ",,,,175941,32498,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2023,175000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$175000 the first year and $175000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. "," In FY23 the DNR will collect fish from an additional 89 waterbodies in addition to the surplus waterbodies collected but not tested in FY22, for a total of 150 waterbodies. Resulting sampling data will be used to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. 28 of the FY23 waterbodies were selected to overlap with a MNDNR study of zebra mussel infested walleye fisheries. Overlap of contaminants sampling with this study will help investigate the potential for increased mercury bioaccumulation in infested waters which is an emerging concern. The remaining 122 waterbody samples will consist of multiple fish species of size classes relevant to human consumption. "," In FY23 the DNR collected and tested fish samples from a total of 120 waterbodies for contaminants testing. Each waterbody sample consisted of multiple fish species. Fish species and size classes’ samples were relevant to human consumption. An average of 20 fish were sampled for each waterbody with a total of 2,471 fish tested for mercury, 35 fish tested for PCBs, and 63 fish tested for PFAS. Contaminant data were collected, processed, and delivered to MPCA partners to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,159600,11497,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2022,175000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$175000 the first year and $175000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. ","In FY22, the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds. ","In FY22, the DNR collected and tested fish samples from a total of 116 waterbodies for contaminants testing. Each waterbody sample consisted of multiple fish species. Fish species and size classes’ samples were relevant to human consumption. An average of 25 fish were sampled for each waterbody with a total of 2,538 fish tested for mercury, 44 fish tested for PCBs, and 333 fish tested for PFAS. Fish samples from an additional 61 surplus waterbodies were sampled and samples archived for testing in FY23. Contaminant data were collected, processed, and delivered to MPCA partners to determine fish consumption advisories, impairment status, and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,159600,11497,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2021,135000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. ","The May 2020 budget forecast required agencies to reduce Clean Water Fund spending by $17.6 million dollars. Funding for supplemental fish contaminant testing was eliminated for FY21 due in part to the inability to collect fish in as many lakes as normal. ","The May 2020 budget forecast required agencies to reduce Clean Water Fund spending by $17.6 million dollars. Funding for supplemental fish contaminant testing was eliminated for FY21 due in part to the inability to collect fish in as many lakes as normal. ",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2020,135000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other fish contaminants including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. ","In FY20 the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds. ","In FY20 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds. ",,,,126427,8572,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2019,135000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time.","In FY19 the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds.","FY19 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination using the Clean Water Fund to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,128427,7574,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2018,135000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time.","In FY18 the DNR will test another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination that will be used by other agencies to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds.","FY18 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information other agencies use to determine fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term statewide trends. ",,,,120258,7371,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2017,135000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","(c) $135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. (d)","In FY17 the DNR will test 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants. ","In FY17 the DNR tested another 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination that is used by other agencies for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes normally tested every year for mercury and other fish contaminants using Game and Fish Funds.",,,,126427,7574,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2016,135000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","(c) $135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury and other contaminants of fish including monitoring to track the status of impaired waters over time. (d)","Every year the DNR will test 80 lake and river sites for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY16 the DNR tested 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants.",,,,138587,14274,,,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2015,135000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time. ","Every year the DNR will test 80 lake and river sites for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY15 the DNR tested 80 lake and river sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants.",,,,144237,,,0.2,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2014,135000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$135000 the first year and $135000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time. ","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","FY14 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers sites for fish mercury contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and long-term state-wide trends trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis for mercury and other fish contaminants. ",,,,120482,4180,,0.2,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2013,130000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$130000 the first year and $130000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","FY13 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,113269,,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2012,130000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(c)","$130000 the first year and $130000 the second year are for assessing mercury contamination of fish including monitoring to track the status of waters impaired by mercury and mercury reduction efforts over time.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","FY12 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,112245,17725,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2011,132000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY11 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,107961,24038,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 3618,"Fish Contamination Assessment",2010,130000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","Every year the DNR will test 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.","In FY10 the DNR tested 80 lakes and rivers for fish contamination to collect information to be used for determining fish consumption advisories impairment status and trend markers for those sites. This is in addition to the approximately 70 lakes that are normally tested on an annual basis.",,,,,,,0.0,,,"The DNR works with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health to determine the level of contamination from mercury and other harmful chemicals in fish from Minnesota's lakes and rivers and to track the success of efforts to reduce mercury pollution. Clean Water Legacy funding is being used to significantly increase (more than double) the number of lakes and rivers that are assessed for mercury contamination on an annual basis. Fish are collected during DNR fishery surveys, processed for laboratory testing, and analyzed for contaminants. The data are processed by the DNR, shared with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health, and long-term trends are summarized in the Clean Water Fund Performance Report. ","Many outdoor recreationists enjoy fishing and eating the fish they catch. Unfortunately, much of the fishery is contaminated with chemicals, primarily mercury. This has resulted in the issuance of a number of fish consumption advisories. Fish contaminant data provide the basis for these advisories. They also provide some measure of the threat to other fish-consuming species, including mink, otter, and loons. In addition, the measurement of mercury levels in fish provides an important indicator of progress in attempts to decrease the release of additional mercury into the environment. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Isaiah,Tolo,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5138",isaiah.tolo@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/fish-contamination-assessment-0,,,, 20686,"Groundwater Management Areas",2017,,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(j)","$1808000 the first year is for beginning to develop and designate groundwater management areas under Minnesota Statutes section 103G.287 subdivision 4. The commissioner in consultation with the commissioners of the Pollution Control Agency health and agriculture shall establish a uniform statewide hydrogeologic mapping system that will include designated groundwater management areas. The mapping system must include wellhead protection areas special well construction areas groundwater provinces groundwater recharge areas and other designated or geographical areas related to groundwater. This mapping system shall be used to implement all groundwater-related laws and for reporting and evaluations. This appropriation is available until June 30 2017. Note: Amount was amended in M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 6.","In FY17 the DNR will finalize and adopt the remaining plans and begin implementing the actions identified. The DNR will also start the process of developing a groundwater model for the Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area.","In FY17 the DNR completed and adopted Groundwater Management Area Plans for the Straight River and Bonanza Valley. The DNR substantially completed the development of a transient groundwater model for the North and East Metro.",,,,250690,10793,,1.5,,,"Minnesota’s use of groundwater has increased over the last two decades. An increasing reliance on groundwater may not be a sustainable path for continued economic growth and development. The DNR is establishing three pilot groundwater management areas (GWMA) to help improve groundwater appropriation decisions and help groundwater users better understand and plan for future groundwater needs associated with economic development. The three areas include: the North and East Metropolitan Region, which includes all of Ramsey and Washington Counties, and the southern portion of Anoka County; the second area includes the Straight River, near Park Rapids; and the third area includes portions of Pope, Stearns, and Kandiyohi counties, known as Bonanza Valley, which includes the towns of Glenwood, Brooten, Belgrade, Elrosa and other communities. Clean Water Funds are used to hire project managers, meeting facilitators and support stakeholder engagement to inform and advise the planning process.","Water is crucial to Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems. Minnesota has a well-deserved image of having abundant water resources, nevertheless, water is not evenly distributed across the state. Despite our popular image, water is becoming scarce in parts of Minnesota. Unprecedented water use conflicts are arising between businesses, towns, and residents. In most areas of the state, we are not yet in “crisis” mode when it comes to water availability. We have time to address these issues and ensure that Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems have adequate water supplies in the future. Each of the selected pilot Groundwater Management Areas has been experiencing increased use and reliance on groundwater to meet public or private needs. The purpose of a groundwater management area is to organize resources and people to better understand the risk of overuse and contamination in these areas, and to develop a plan that the Department of Natural Resources can implement to ensure sustainable use of water. ",,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jason,Moeckel,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5240",jason.moeckel@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Inventory, Mapping, Planning, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Technical Assistance, Demonstration/Pilot Project","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Clearwater, Douglas, Meeker, Swift, Wadena, Anoka, Becker, Hubbard, Pope, Ramsey, Stearns, Washington",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/groundwater-management-areas,,,, 20686,"Groundwater Management Areas",2016,,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(j)","$1808000 the first year is for beginning to develop and designate groundwater management areas under Minnesota Statutes section 103G.287 subdivision 4. The commissioner in consultation with the commissioners of the Pollution Control Agency health and agriculture shall establish a uniform statewide hydrogeologic mapping system that will include designated groundwater management areas. The mapping system must include wellhead protection areas special well construction areas groundwater provinces groundwater recharge areas and other designated or geographical areas related to groundwater. This mapping system shall be used to implement all groundwater-related laws and for reporting and evaluations. This appropriation is available until June 30 2017. Note: Amount was amended in M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 6.","The DNR will finalize three Groundwater Management Area (GWMA) plans that can be approved by the commissioner. The DNR will form new advisory committee’s to advise the agency during plan implementation. Implementation will include coordinating with other agencies and local units of government and developing new information to evaluate sustainability of current and projected water use. ","In FY16 the DNR worked with stakeholder advisory committees to complete draft plans for each of the three Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs). The plan for the North and East Metro Area was finalized and approved by the DNR Commissioner. Plans for the Bonanza Valley and Straight River were nearing completion and approval. ",,,,256899,83660,,2.3,,,"Minnesota’s use of groundwater has increased over the last two decades. An increasing reliance on groundwater may not be a sustainable path for continued economic growth and development. The DNR is establishing three pilot groundwater management areas (GWMA) to help improve groundwater appropriation decisions and help groundwater users better understand and plan for future groundwater needs associated with economic development. The three areas include: the North and East Metropolitan Region, which includes all of Ramsey and Washington Counties, and the southern portion of Anoka County; the second area includes the Straight River, near Park Rapids; and the third area includes portions of Pope, Stearns, and Kandiyohi counties, known as Bonanza Valley, which includes the towns of Glenwood, Brooten, Belgrade, Elrosa and other communities. Clean Water Funds are used to hire project managers, meeting facilitators and support stakeholder engagement to inform and advise the planning process.","Water is crucial to Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems. Minnesota has a well-deserved image of having abundant water resources, nevertheless, water is not evenly distributed across the state. Despite our popular image, water is becoming scarce in parts of Minnesota. Unprecedented water use conflicts are arising between businesses, towns, and residents. In most areas of the state, we are not yet in “crisis” mode when it comes to water availability. We have time to address these issues and ensure that Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems have adequate water supplies in the future. Each of the selected pilot Groundwater Management Areas has been experiencing increased use and reliance on groundwater to meet public or private needs. The purpose of a groundwater management area is to organize resources and people to better understand the risk of overuse and contamination in these areas, and to develop a plan that the Department of Natural Resources can implement to ensure sustainable use of water. ",,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jason,Moeckel,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5240",jason.moeckel@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Inventory, Mapping, Planning, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Technical Assistance, Demonstration/Pilot Project","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Clearwater, Douglas, Meeker, Swift, Wadena, Anoka, Becker, Hubbard, Pope, Ramsey, Stearns, Washington",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/groundwater-management-areas,,,, 20686,"Groundwater Management Areas",2015,,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(j)","$1808000 the first year is for beginning to develop and designate groundwater management areas under Minnesota Statutes section 103G.287 subdivision 4. The commissioner in consultation with the commissioners of the Pollution Control Agency health and agriculture shall establish a uniform statewide hydrogeologic mapping system that will include designated groundwater management areas. The mapping system must include wellhead protection areas special well construction areas groundwater provinces groundwater recharge areas and other designated or geographical areas related to groundwater. This mapping system shall be used to implement all groundwater-related laws and for reporting and evaluations. This appropriation is available until June 30 2017. Note: Amount was amended in M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 6.","The DNR will conduct technical analysis of existing information in each GWMA and finalize a plan that can be approved by the DNR Commissioner and implemented over the next 5 years within these areas. Each plan will include specific actions that the DNR will take to: ensure groundwater use does not harm aquifers and ecosystems and does not negatively impact surface waters; ensure that groundwater use is reasonable efficient and complies with water conservation requirements; ensure groundwater use will not degrade water quality; ensure groundwater use does not create unresolved well interferences or water use conflicts; and ensure all groundwater users have the necessary permits to use groundwater. For complete information see the GWMAs webpage at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/gwmp/areas.html ","The DNR continued technical analysis and worked with stakeholders to develop draft plans for the three proposed groundwater management areas. The areas include: the North and East Metro Bonanza Valley (Glenwood to Paynesville) and the Straight River (near Park Rapids). The draft plans include specific actions the DNR will take to ensure that water use is sustainable. ",,,,379861,93329,,3.2,,,"Minnesota’s use of groundwater has increased over the last two decades. An increasing reliance on groundwater may not be a sustainable path for continued economic growth and development. The DNR is establishing three pilot groundwater management areas (GWMA) to help improve groundwater appropriation decisions and help groundwater users better understand and plan for future groundwater needs associated with economic development. The three areas include: the North and East Metropolitan Region, which includes all of Ramsey and Washington Counties, and the southern portion of Anoka County; the second area includes the Straight River, near Park Rapids; and the third area includes portions of Pope, Stearns, and Kandiyohi counties, known as Bonanza Valley, which includes the towns of Glenwood, Brooten, Belgrade, Elrosa and other communities. Clean Water Funds are used to hire project managers, meeting facilitators and support stakeholder engagement to inform and advise the planning process.","Water is crucial to Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems. Minnesota has a well-deserved image of having abundant water resources, nevertheless, water is not evenly distributed across the state. Despite our popular image, water is becoming scarce in parts of Minnesota. Unprecedented water use conflicts are arising between businesses, towns, and residents. In most areas of the state, we are not yet in “crisis” mode when it comes to water availability. We have time to address these issues and ensure that Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems have adequate water supplies in the future. Each of the selected pilot Groundwater Management Areas has been experiencing increased use and reliance on groundwater to meet public or private needs. The purpose of a groundwater management area is to organize resources and people to better understand the risk of overuse and contamination in these areas, and to develop a plan that the Department of Natural Resources can implement to ensure sustainable use of water. ",,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jason,Moeckel,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5240",jason.moeckel@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Inventory, Mapping, Planning, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Technical Assistance, Demonstration/Pilot Project","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Clearwater, Douglas, Meeker, Swift, Wadena, Anoka, Becker, Hubbard, Pope, Ramsey, Stearns, Washington",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/groundwater-management-areas,,,, 20686,"Groundwater Management Areas",2014,1808000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(j)","$1808000 the first year is for beginning to develop and designate groundwater management areas under Minnesota Statutes section 103G.287 subdivision 4. The commissioner in consultation with the commissioners of the Pollution Control Agency health and agriculture shall establish a uniform statewide hydrogeologic mapping system that will include designated groundwater management areas. The mapping system must include wellhead protection areas special well construction areas groundwater provinces groundwater recharge areas and other designated or geographical areas related to groundwater. This mapping system shall be used to implement all groundwater-related laws and for reporting and evaluations. This appropriation is available until June 30 2017. Note: Amount was amended in M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 6.","In FY14 the DNR will lead a year-long effort in three proposed Groundwater Management Areas: the North and East Metro GWMA the Bonanza Valley GWMA and the Straight River GWMA. A series of stakeholder meetings will be held and Preliminary Assessment Reports will be completed for all three GWMAs.","In FY14 the DNR initiated planning projects and stakeholder involvement efforts to establish three groundwater management areas (GWMA’s). DNR formed a project advisory team (PAT) for each of these areas to provide advice and feedback during the GWMA planning process. The project advisory team includes cities permitted users business people conservation districts and other state agencies. DNR completed preliminary assessments of technical information and shared that information with the PAT’s over a series of monthly meetings. Discussions about potential actions are ongoing and will inform plan development. For complete information see the GWMAs webpage at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/gwmp/areas.html ",,,,267151,62179,,2.5,,,"Minnesota’s use of groundwater has increased over the last two decades. An increasing reliance on groundwater may not be a sustainable path for continued economic growth and development. The DNR is establishing three pilot groundwater management areas (GWMA) to help improve groundwater appropriation decisions and help groundwater users better understand and plan for future groundwater needs associated with economic development. The three areas include: the North and East Metropolitan Region, which includes all of Ramsey and Washington Counties, and the southern portion of Anoka County; the second area includes the Straight River, near Park Rapids; and the third area includes portions of Pope, Stearns, and Kandiyohi counties, known as Bonanza Valley, which includes the towns of Glenwood, Brooten, Belgrade, Elrosa and other communities. Clean Water Funds are used to hire project managers, meeting facilitators and support stakeholder engagement to inform and advise the planning process.","Water is crucial to Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems. Minnesota has a well-deserved image of having abundant water resources, nevertheless, water is not evenly distributed across the state. Despite our popular image, water is becoming scarce in parts of Minnesota. Unprecedented water use conflicts are arising between businesses, towns, and residents. In most areas of the state, we are not yet in “crisis” mode when it comes to water availability. We have time to address these issues and ensure that Minnesota’s economies and ecosystems have adequate water supplies in the future. Each of the selected pilot Groundwater Management Areas has been experiencing increased use and reliance on groundwater to meet public or private needs. The purpose of a groundwater management area is to organize resources and people to better understand the risk of overuse and contamination in these areas, and to develop a plan that the Department of Natural Resources can implement to ensure sustainable use of water. ",,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jason,Moeckel,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5240",jason.moeckel@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Inventory, Mapping, Planning, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Technical Assistance, Demonstration/Pilot Project","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Clearwater, Douglas, Meeker, Swift, Wadena, Anoka, Becker, Hubbard, Pope, Ramsey, Stearns, Washington",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/groundwater-management-areas,,,, 37426,"Hydrolic Definition Using Stable Isotope Signatures",2017,4000,,,,,,,,,,,.04,"University of Waterloo","For-Profit Business/Entity","The lab will analyze stable isotopes oxygen-18 and deuterium in water samples collected in streams, lakes, wetlands, groundwater, and point sources. This data can identify primary flow sources under varying flow conditions (low to very high flows). Identifying sources can help identify pollutant sources or locate areas that are in need of protection. For example, you may want to protect an area that contributes cold groundwater to a coldwater fishery. Or it could link a water chemistry impairment to a specific source. ",,,2016-10-12,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jenny,Jasperson,MPCA,"525 S Lake Ave Ste 400",Duluth,MN,55802,"(218) 302-6634",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hydrolic-definition-using-stable-isotope-signatures,,,, 37426,"Hydrolic Definition Using Stable Isotope Signatures",2013,2982,,,,,,,,,,,.02,"University of Waterloo","For-Profit Business/Entity","The lab will analyze stable isotopes oxygen-18 and deuterium in water samples collected in streams, lakes, wetlands, groundwater, and point sources. This data can identify primary flow sources under varying flow conditions (low to very high flows). Identifying sources can help identify pollutant sources or locate areas that are in need of protection. For example, you may want to protect an area that contributes cold groundwater to a coldwater fishery. Or it could link a water chemistry impairment to a specific source. ",,,2016-10-12,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jenny,Jasperson,MPCA,"525 S Lake Ave Ste 400",Duluth,MN,55802,"(218) 302-6634",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hydrolic-definition-using-stable-isotope-signatures,,,, 37684,"Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) Land Segment Nutrient Guidance Development",2017,34955,,,,,,,,,,,0.1,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to develop the guidance needed for water quality parameter evaluation and calibration for Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) applications that utilize the general water quality constituent routines on the land surface to generate loadings of nutrients and organic material for input to water bodies to support dissolved oxygen (DO), nutrient, and algal simulation. ",,,2017-06-01,2017-11-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-land-segment-nutrient-guidance-development,,,, 36662,"Identifying Best Management Practices and Barriers to Adoption",2017,58000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(c) ",,"- Estimated 156 CNMPs/Feedlot Projects and CNMPs - 3,120 pounds of phosphorus per year - 10,140 pounds of nitrogen per year - Eliminate backlog of farmers waiting for CNMP","Contracted with Freshwater Society to plan and faciliate outreach meeting, and draft report. Key takeaways include: Take-aways from the Agriculture and Groundwater Report at the EOT SWCD retreat. 1.Education and outreach to non-farmers. Need to better tell the story of practices implemented by farmers and some of the challenges they face. 2.Field days and tours are needed to promote practices. Showcase where practices are proven to work in our area. 3.Need to facilitate peer to peer learning/sharing opportunities. 4.Education and information on new technologies and how to make sense of information or data from them. 5.SWCD should invest time in forming new partnerships with co-ops, agronomists etc. 6.Research needs to be conducted on local levels 7.Financial incentives or having trial equipment available to reduce the financial risk of making changes. ","Achieved proposed outcomes",,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",,,"Board information for grantees can be found within contact directories on BWSR's website under Operational Resources, ""About Our Partners"".",,"Otter Tail, East SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The purpose of this project is to identify effective irrigation and nutrient management best management practices and technologies and the barriers that prevent irrigators, producers, and other agricultural partners from adopting them in Otter Tail County. The primary goal is to reduce nitrate in areas where groundwater is susceptible to contamination as mapped by The Minnesota Department of Health by identifying effective BMPs and addressing the barriers to their adoption.",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Benjamin,Underhill,"Otter Tail, East SWCD",,,,,"218-346-4260 x 120",ben.underhill@eotswcd.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,"Becker, Douglas, Otter Tail, Todd, Wadena",,"Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Chippewa River, Crow Wing River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Redeye River, Sauk River, Wild Rice River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/identifying-best-management-practices-and-barriers-adoption,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Nicole Clapp",No 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2025,150000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (g) $150,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number of farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of partners collaborating on the development of new irrigation scheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely Number of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ",,,,,,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2024,150000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (g) $150,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number of farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of partners collaborating on the development of new irrigation scheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely Number of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ","From 2014-2024, the University of Minnesota-Extension Irrigation Specialist Position has completed 212 educational events (presentations, workshops, field days), published 38 blogs/podcasts, and submitted 14 peer-reviewed journal articles to engage over 11,000 farmers, crop consultants, and co-op dealers. This work is in cooperation with 42 local units of government (LGUs). ",,,,123887,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2023,135000,"M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (g) $135,000 the first year and $135,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2025. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number of farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of partners collaborating on the development of new irrigation scheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely Number of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ",,,,,149599,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2022,135000,"M.L. 2021, Chapter 1, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (g) $135,000 the first year and $135,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2025.   "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number offarmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of irrigators participating in Clean Water funded irrigation management programs Number of irrigation best management practices (BMPs) revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ","From 2014-2022, the University of Minnesota-Extension Irrigation Specialist Position has completed over 180 educational events (presentations, workshops, field days), published 26 blogs/podcasts, and submitted 9 peer-reviewed journal articles to engage over 10,000 farmers, crop consultants, and co-op dealers. This work is in cooperation with 20 local units of government (LGUs). About 500 irrigators, managing about 100,000 irrigator acres, participated in Clean Water funded irrigation management programs (irrigation clinics, irrigation field days, nitrogen management conference). At least 250 irrigators access daily evapotranspiration weather information for water management. In FY21: 3 sets of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Early season irrigation water management (Link to blog) Crop water use and irrigation timing (Link to blog) Irrigation and nutrient management (Link to blog) Checklist for winterizing your irrigation system (2020) Predicting the last irrigation for corn and soybeans in central Minnesota (2020) How to ensure efficient crop irrigation management (2020) Interested in upgrading your irrigation system? Cost-share program available to irrigators in 19 Minnesota counties (2022) Other notable deliverables from this position: Developed a new two-day training to cover new irrigation technology, nitrogen management, and water management “Minnesota Irrigators Program” Participants that complete the course and are MAWQCP certified are eligible for Irrigation Water Management endorsement Irrigation scheduling references and BMPs (2020) Statewide Irrigation Soils map and Survey (2020) GIS Irrigability Data Layer (2020) Has developed an Extension publication “Irrigation Best Management Practices for Minnesota”. The publication is currently under review (2022) Precision Irrigation Cost-Share $1.2M in state funds used to leverage $3,510,000 funds from the USDA NRCS Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) 33 partners provide financial and technical support for precision irrigation to irrigators (USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Services (NRCS), soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs), institutes of education, Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe, state agencies, irrigator's associations, and businesses) 5-year project First opened for applications May 2022 and a second round of cost-share closed December 16, 2022. ",,,,120963,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2021,150000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (g) $150,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water qualityspecialist through University of Minnesota Extension. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number offarmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of irrigators participating in Clean Water funded irrigation management programs Number of irrigation best management practices (BMPs) revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for a summary. ",,,,156511,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2020,150000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (g) $150,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a regional irrigation water quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number offarmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of irrigators participating in Clean Water funded irrigation management programs Number of irrigation best management practices (BMPs) revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ","In 2015-2020: About 7,100 farmers, crop consultants, and co-op dealers participated in 118 educational events (presentations,workshops, field days) 20 local government unit partners are involved in irrigation water quality protection 500 irrigators, managing about 100,000 acres, participated in Clean Water Fund supported irrigation management programs (irrigation clinics, irrigation field days, nitrogen management conference) In 2020: About 250 irrigators accessed daily evapotranspiration weather information for water management Three new irrigation best management practices were revised, developed and promoted online ",,,,175441,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2019,110000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,128267,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2018,110000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,68479,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2017,110000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ","Irrigation specialist: Joshua Stamper FY14-15:  The University of Minnesota-Extension Irrigation Specialist Position completed 42 presentations, workshops and other educational events attended by approximately 2,300 farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers. Worked in cooperation with 8 local units of government (LGUs). FY16-17: 44 education and outreach activities were completed involving approximately 2,700participants. Cooperation continues with 8 LGUs. New irrigation scheduling references and BMPs are under development which will lead to greater irrigation BMP adoption. Dakota County Irrigation Scheduling Program focused on providing technical advice to irrigators about irrigation water management tools that matched their irrigation management. Surveyed irrigators and determined that there is significant interest in collecting in-season irrigation water sampling to credit nitratesthat are in irrigation water sample. Completed: Revision of irrigation water management publications Statewide Irrigation Soils map and Survey GIS Irrigability Data Layer YouTube Videos (easily accessible educational materials) Irrigation specialist Dr. Vasu Sharma started July 1, 2018   ",,,,53790,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2016,110000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,149424,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2015,110000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2013: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number of farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities Number of partners collaborating on the development of new irrigation scheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely Number of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted "," Number of presentations, workshops and other educational events hosted each year and the number of farmers, crop consultants and co-op dealers that attend (96 events / 395 participants) Number of local units of government participating in irrigator outreach and education activities (8) Number of partners collaborating on the development of new irrigation scheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely (6) Information will be collected via personal conversations, interviews, focus groups or surveys for these performance measures. Number of irrigation BMPs revised, developed, and promoted Number of BMPs adopted ",,,,139361,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 10024600,"Irrigation Water Quality Protection",2014,110000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2013: (h) $110,000 the first year and $110,000 the second year are to provide funding for a regional irrigationwater quality specialist through University of Minnesota Extension. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,28945,,,,,"Public College/University","Funding supports an Irrigation Specialist to develop guidance and provide education on irrigation and nitrogenbest management practices (BMPs). In this position, Dr. Vasu Sharma provides direct support to irrigators onissues of irrigation scheduling and soil water monitoring. She is collaborating on the development of new irrigationscheduling tools that help irrigators manage water and nitrogen resources more precisely. These tools help reducenitrogen leaching losses in irrigated cropping systems. Dr. Vasu Sharma Irrigation Extension Specialist vasudha@umn.edu University of Minnesota 439 Borlaug Hall 1991 Upper Buford Circle St. Paul, MN 55108-6028 ","Irrigation of nitrogen demanding row crops (such as corn, potatoes and edible beans) is a major potential source of nitrate in groundwater especially in the areas with coarse-textured (sandy) soils such as those commonly found in central Minnesota. The number of irrigation permits is currently at an all-time high. Water management and nitrogen fertilizer strategies must be managed together. Many farmers, particularly those newly implementing irrigation, would benefit from increased education on irrigation and nitrogen best management practices (BMPs). The absence of an Irrigation Specialist was identified as a critical need by the irrigation community and other ag stakeholders. During the 2011 Forum on Minnesota Irrigated Agriculture. the lack of an irrigation specialist at the University of Minnesota was one of the most important issues discussed. Report on the Forum on Minnesota Irrigation Agriculture March 8, 2011 ","Minnesota’s Irrigation Specialist position started in June 2014 and is providing education on irrigation management and nitrogen fertilizer best management practices (BMPs). This position is collaborating with public and private entities to develop and demonstrate tools and technology to protect and conserve groundwater resources. ",,2025-06-17,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jeppe,Kjaersgaard,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 201-6149",jeppe.kjaersgaard@state.mn.us,Education/Outreach/Engagement,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,"Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Cass, Chippewa, Clay, Crow Wing, Dakota, Douglas, Goodhue, Grant, Hubbard, Isanti, Kandiyohi, Kittson, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Marshall, Meeker, Morrison, Mower, Norman, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Polk, Pope, Red Lake, Renville, Rice, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Wabasha, Wadena, Washington, Watonwan, Wright",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/irrigation-water-quality-protection,,,, 37686,"Lac qui Parle River and Minnesota River Headwaters Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Project",2017,184669,,,,,,,,,,,0.65,"Houston Engineering Inc","For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to establish load reduction requirements for impaired waters and to develop restoration strategies to improve water quality for impaired waters and protection strategies to maintain the quality of water for water bodies meeting standards. ",,"Lac qui Parle River Watershed Minnesota River - Headwaters Watershed ",2017-06-12,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Katherine,Pekarek-Scott,MPCA,"1601 E Highway 12",Willmar,MN,56201,"(320) 441-6973",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Big Stone, Chippewa, Lac qui Parle, Lincoln, Stevens, Traverse, Yellow Medicine",,"Lac qui Parle River, Minnesota River - Headwaters",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lac-qui-parle-river-and-minnesota-river-headwaters-watershed-restoration-and-protection,,,, 36664,"Lake Ida & Ditch 23 Wetland Project",2017,227430,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(c) ",,"Instead of implementing practices where a landowner inquires, our office can contact landowners with the highest priority from this project to reduce the greatest amount of need for soil health practices, reduce runoff and ultimately reduce the amount of ","An engineering firm was selected through an RFP process to complete a watershed assessment and monitoring. Project was completed as proposed, and included modeling of watershed and CD 23 wetland area. Completion of final project report. Public meeting held for landowners, Lake Assn. and Gov't officials on final findings and recommendations for future BMP projects and CD 23 pollution reduction project. ","achieved proposed outcomes",56858,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",227430,,,,"Douglas SWCD","Local/Regional Government","The Lake Ida and Ditch 23 Wetland Feasibility Project will investigate and review the phosphorus loading of Lake Ida and design a project to protect Lake Ida water quality. Lake Ida is a 'high quality, unimpaired lake at the highest risk of becoming impaired' according to MPCA's Lakes of Phosphorus Sensitivity Significance. With the County Ditch 23 inlet identified as a priority area to reduce phosphorous, a professional engineering firm will explore the best solution to reduce phosphorus. ",,,,2020-05-11,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jerome,Haggenmiller,"Douglas SWCD","900 Robert St Ste 102",Alexandria,MN,56308,320-763-3191,jerome.haggenmiller@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Douglas,,"Long Prairie River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-ida-ditch-23-wetland-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf ","Marcey Westrick", 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2025,1450000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(b)","$1,450,000 the first year and $1,450,000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","In FY25 DNR staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. FIBI surveys representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes in nearshore and deep-water zones. DNR will also complete approximately 20 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities and approximately 100 coldwater, oxygenated habitat surveys to evaluate habitat availability for coldwater fishes. The survey data will be used to determine whether the lakes meet biological standards, to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. Survey data will be used in watershed assessments for about 101 lakes in three major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. Approximately six watershed stressor identification reports will be completed and submitted to MPCA for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. DNR will continue working with MPCA and other partners towards the implementation of new standards to protect coldwater fish habitat and exceptionally diverse and healthy fish communities. DNR will also continue work to expand the geographic scope of FIBI monitoring and assessment to include lakes in far northeastern Minnesota by increasing sampling in northeastern MN lakes and developing new models for the unique fish communities. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports will be updated annually on the DNR, MPCA, and Minnesota Water Research Digital Library websites, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI and habitat data will be used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2024,1450000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(b)","$1,450,000 the first year and $1,450,000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. "," In FY24 DNR staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. FIBI surveys representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. DNR will also complete approximately 40 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities and approximately 50 coldwater, oxygenated habitat surveys to evaluate habitat availability for coldwater fishes. The survey data will be used to determine whether the lakes meet biological standards, to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. Survey data will be used in watershed assessments for about 84 lakes in six major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. Approximately six watershed stressor identification reports will be completed and submitted to MPCA for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. DNR will continue working with MPCA and other partners towards the implementation of new standards to protect coldwater fish habitat and exceptionally diverse and healthy fish communities. This will include responding to public comments on proposed standards and completing a biomonitoring program review in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency. DNR will also continue work to expand the geographic scope of FIBI monitoring and assessment to include lakes in far northeastern Minnesota (including lakes within the Lake Superior and Rainy Lake Basins). FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports will be updated annually on the DNR and MPCA websites, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data will be used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ","In FY24 Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff completed 136 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 217 habitat surveys (18 shoreline habitat and 199 oxythermal habitat). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame, in nearshore and deep-water zones. Shoreline habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. Oxythermal surveys measure available cold, oxygenated water for coldwater fishes. FIBI survey information was used by MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for 77 lake assessments in six major watersheds throughout Minnesota. Assessments determine biological condition for identifying lakes considered as impaired, lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and lakes of exceptional biological quality. DNR published watershed stressor identification reports for lakes in three watersheds. In collaboration with MPCA, DNR drafted new biological and water quality standards and supporting documents outlining the science behind the new standards. The new standards will protect coldwater fishes and their habitat, and lakes with exceptionally healthy and diverse fish communities. DNR expanded FIBI program work to the far northeastern part of the state, completing over 163 surveys in the Lake Superior North and Rainy River Headwater Watersheds; these lakes will be assessed with new standards to protect coldwater lakes in the next two years. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports are available on the DNR website, MPCA website, Minnesota Water Research Digital Library website, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI and coldwater fish habitat data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and in Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,1322766,121378,,13.1,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2023,1000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","In FY23 DNR staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. FIBI surveys representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. DNR will also complete approximately 40 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities and approximately 15 coldwater, oxygenated habitat surveys to evaluate habitat availability for coldwater fishes. The survey data will be used to determine whether the lakes meet biological standards, to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. Survey data will be used in watershed assessments for about 36 lakes in three major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule (MPCA reduced the number of watersheds due to 2020-2021 Covid related delays). Approximately six watershed stressor identification reports will be submitted to MPCA for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. DNR will continue working with MPCA and other partners towards the implementation of new standards to protect coldwater fish habitat and exceptionally diverse and healthy fish communities. This will include collecting public comments on proposed standards and undertaking a biomonitoring program review in collaboration with the Environmental Protection Agency. DNR will also begin work to expand the geographic scope of FIBI monitoring and assessment to include lakes in far northeastern Minnesota (including lakes within the Lake Superior and Rainy Lake Basins). FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports will be updated annually on the DNR and MPCA websites, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data will be used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ","In FY23 Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff completed 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 102 habitat surveys (31 shoreline habitat and 71 oxythermal habitat). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities or cold, oxygenated water available for coldwater fishes. FIBI survey information was used by MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for 42 lake assessments in three major watersheds throughout Minnesota. Assessments determine biological condition for identifying lakes considered as impaired, lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and lakes of exceptional biological quality. DNR published watershed stressor identification reports for lakes in four watersheds. DNR drafted new biological and water quality standards and two technical support documents outlining the science behind the new standards in collaboration with MPCA. The new standards will protect coldwater fishes and their habitat and lakes with exceptionally healthy and diverse fish communities. DNR expanded FIBI program work to the far northeastern part of the state, completing over 30 surveys in the Lake Superior North Watershed. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports are available on the DNR website, MPCA website, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and in Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,1023084,76759,,11.8,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2022,1000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(b)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","Fish: In FY22 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 120 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 30 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. FIBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 109 lakes in two major watersheds following MPCA's watershed schedule including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We will publish stressor identification reports for lakes in approximately six watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. FIBI data will be used for prioritization of protection and restoration projects in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Watershed Plans. We will work towards implementation of new standards to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. In FY22 DNR Ecological and Water Resources (EWR) staff will shift their work focus to directly support the Fish IBI surveys. Most aquatic plant IBI surveys will be discontinued. This change is being made to address budget reductions and shifting priorities. EWR staff will help conduct fish surveys as well as floating and emergent plant surveys and shoreline habitat surveys. ","Department of Natural Resources (DNR) staff completed 137 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 61 habitat surveys. FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample entire lake fish communities, game and nongame fishes, in nearshore and deep-water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities or cold, oxygenated water available for coldwater fishes. FIBI survey information was used by MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for 113 lake assessments in two major watersheds including 39 lakes within the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area. Assessments determine biological condition for identifying lakes considered as impaired, lakes vulnerable to future impairment, and lakes of exceptional biological quality. DNR delivered watershed stressor identification reports for lakes in five watersheds to MPCA for publication. DNR drafted new biological and water quality standards and two technical support documents outlining the science behind the new standards in collaboration with MPCA. The new standards will protect coldwater fishes and their habitat and lakes with exceptionally healthy and diverse fish communities. FIBI survey data and reports, assessment results, and stressor identification reports are available on the DNR website, MPCA website, and as a criterion of lake health in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework online tool. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and in Comprehensive Watershed Plans. ",,,,994282,75775,,11,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2021,1250000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. The number of IBI sampling assessments in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide sampling assessments must be proportional to the number of IBI-suitable lakes in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide IBI-suitable lakes. ","Fish: In FY21 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 100 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 50 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. FIBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 106 lakes in six major watersheds following MPCA's watershed schedule including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We will publish stressor identification reports for approximately four watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. FIBI data will be used for prioritization of protection and restoration projects in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will finalize standards and supporting science to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. In FY21 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA for lakes the MPCA will assess in 2021 or 2022. We will survey various lake plant communities across the state including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods. We will continue providing training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect and contribute aquatic plant data. We will also be working on data review and model development for a nearshore aquatic plant IBI. ","Fish: DNR staff completed 117 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 75 shoreline habitat surveys (survey work was reduced due to COVID-19 related staffing and fieldwork limitations). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample game and nongame fish communities in nearshore and deep-water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. FIBI survey information was used by MPCA for 106 lake assessments in six major watersheds including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. Assessments determined biological condition identified impaired lakes lakes vulnerable to future impairment and lakes of exceptional biological quality. We published stressor identification reports for lakes in six watersheds. We drafted standards and technical support documents to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies and Watershed Plans.   Aquatic Plants: DNR biologists analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to assist with the stressor identification process for lakes that are impaired for biology. Due to COVID-19 restrictions DNR biologists focused efforts on shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands. We completed 13 near-shore plant surveys seven floating and emergent plant surveys and one point-intercept plant survey. These data are used for evaluating shoreland development as a lake stressor. Also because accurate plant identification is essential for these assessments we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that contribute aquatic plant data used to inform the aquatic plant IBI. As COVID-19 related policies prevented in person training sessions we developed web-based modules to facilitate training. ",,,,991375,104796,,8.7,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2020,1250000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. The number of IBI sampling assessments in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide sampling assessments must be proportional to the number of IBI-suitable lakes in the seven-county metropolitan area and the cities of Rochester and Duluth relative to the number of statewide IBI-suitable lakes. ","In FY20 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 140 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 75 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. FIBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 55 lakes in four major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will publish stressor identification reports for approximately four watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. We will draft standards and supporting science to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. In FY19 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA for lakes scheduled for assessment in 2020 or 2021. Statewide we will survey a variety of lake plant communities including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods and we will continue to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant data. ","Fish: DNR staff completed 72 fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys and 64 shoreline habitat surveys (survey work was reduced due to COVID-19 related fieldwork limitations and a budget cut). FIBI surveys are designed to representatively sample game and nongame fish communities in nearshore and deep water zones. Habitat surveys evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. FIBI survey information was used by MPCA for 46 lake assessments in four major watersheds including lakes within the seven-county metropolitan area. Assessments determined biological condition identified impaired lakes lakes vulnerable to future impairment and lakes of exceptional biological quality. We published stressor identification reports for three watersheds. We worked with MPCA to draft standards and supporting science to protect cold-water fish habitat and exceptionally diverse fish communities. FIBI data is used for prioritization in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies.   Aquatic Plants: DNR biologists analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine whether lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists conducted surveys at 30 priority lakes to collect the data needed for plant IBI analysis and development. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop plant IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Since accurate plant identification is essential for plant IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that contribute aquatic plant data used to inform the aquatic plant IBI. Because COVID-19 related policies prevented our ability to hold in person training sessions we developed web based training modules to facilitate training opportunities. ",,,,1246102,98444,,15.5,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2019,1250000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments.","Fish: In FY19 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys in lakes. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 75 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. Fish IBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 78 lakes in six major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet standards to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection. We will produce stressor identification reports for approximately three watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on fish IBI results. We will continue to refine fish IBI tools and develop metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY19 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA for lakes the MPCA will assess in 2019 or 2020. Statewide we will survey various lake plant communities including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods. We will continue providing training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect and contribute aquatic plant data.","In FY19 DNR Fisheries staff completed 144 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (FIBI) surveys on lakes. FIBI surveys sample game and nongame fish communities in nearshore and deep water zones. We conducted 110 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish communities. The MPCA used the FIBI information in watershed assessments for 80 lakes in six major watersheds bringing the total to over 450 lakes assessed. The information was used to determine if the lakes meet standards to identify lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We published stressor identification reports for two additional watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on FIBI results. Finally we continued refining FIBI tools with a focus on developing standards to protect lakes that support cold-water habitat and exceptional fish communities. In FY19 DNR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine—together with information from the fish IBI surveys described above—whether the lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists conducted detailed field surveys at 57 priority lakes that lacked the data needed for plant IBI analysis and development. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop plant IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Since accurate plant identification is essential for plant IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs which has led to the combined sampling of 156 total lakes that will be used for IBI analysis and development.",,,,1335951,100677,,17.5,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2018,1250000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments.","Fish: In FY18 DNR Fisheries staff will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys including near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish in shallow and deep water zones. We will also complete approximately 75 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. Fish IBI survey information will be used in MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) watershed assessments for about 160 lakes in four major watersheds following MPCA’s watershed schedule. The information will be used to determine whether the lakes meet water quality standards identify and analyze lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS). We will produce stressor ID reports for three watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on Fish IBI scores. We will continue to refine Fish IBI tools and develop metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY18 DNR biologists will continue to analyze and deliver aquatic plant data to the MPCA. We will conduct field surveys on about 50 lakes in the North Fork Crow River Snake River and Sauk River watersheds which are scheduled to be assessed by the MPCA in 2019 or 2020. Statewide we will survey a variety of lake plant communities including unique and rare plant communities to help refine rapid assessment methods. Finally because accurate plant identification is essential for IBI surveys we will continue to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant data.","Fish: In FY18 DNR biologists completed 160 fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys in lakes. The surveys are designed to representatively sample fish communities including game and nongame fish in nearshore and deep water zones. We also conducted 109 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreline activities on fish community metrics. The MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) used the resulting information to assess 189 lakes in four major watersheds–specifically to determine whether the lakes meet water quality standards to identify and evaluate lakes vulnerable to future impairment and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection. We produced stressor identification reports for three watersheds for lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on last year’s fish IBI results. Finally we continued refining fish IBI tools and developing metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY18 DNR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine—together with fish IBI information—whether the lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists conducted detailed surveys at 75 priority lakes to collect the data needed for plant IBI analysis and development. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop plant IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Since accurate plant identification is essential for plant IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR programs that contribute aquatic plant data.",,,,1251130,93268,,16.6,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2017,1300000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","(b) $1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments.","Fish: In FY17 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. About 75 shoreline habitat surveys will be conducted for stressor ID purposes. Fish IBI survey information will be used as part of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)’s watershed assessments for approximately 56 lakes in three major watersheds. Based on the Fish IBI lakes will be designated as impaired or meeting standards. In addition the list of lakes of exceptional biological quality will be updated to help identify which lakes are priorities for protection in the development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will produce stressor ID reports for six watersheds; for about 25 lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on their Fish IBI score. Aquatic Plants: In FY17 EWR biologists will organize analyze and deliver aquatic plant data which the MPCA will use to determine whether lakes are meeting water quality standards. We will continue to provide training and technical support to staff in other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant data and survey shoreline habitat. We will focus plant surveys on lakes Mississippi River-Brainerd Mississippi River – Grand Rapids Ottertail River and Kettle River watersheds. We will conduct intensive detailed field surveys at 20 priority lakes where there are not enough data to do a quality IBI assessment and we will survey shoreline habitat and delineate emergent plant stands on about 50 lakes. This will help us develop additional IBI metrics for non-nutrient stressors.","Fish: In FY17 DNR staff completed 157 Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys of fish. The surveys include near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish in shallow and deep water zones. Staff also conducted 112 shoreline habitat surveys to evaluate the impact of shoreland activities on fish community metrics. The MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) used the resulting information in watershed assessments for 54 lakes in three major watersheds. The information was used to determine whether the lakes meet water quality standards identify and analyze lakes vulnerable to future impairment and identify lakes of exceptional biological quality as priorities for protection in Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS). DNR staff produced stressor identification reports for six watersheds in which 28 lakes were designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on Fish IBI score. Finally DNR staff continued refining Fish IBI tools and developing metrics suitable for lakes that support cold-water habitat. Aquatic Plants: In FY17 DNR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data to help the MPCA determine – together with information from the Fish IBI surveys described above—whether the lakes meet water quality standards. To match the MPCA’s watershed assessment schedule DNR biologists focused on lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd Mississippi River-Sartell Otter Tail River and Kettle River watersheds conducting detailed field surveys at 50 priority lakes that lacked the data needed for IBI analysis. This included shoreline habitat surveys and delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant stands—two types of data needed to develop IBI metrics for evaluating shoreland development as a lake water quality stressor. Finally because accurate plant identification is essential for IBI surveys we continued to provide training and technical support on plant identification and survey methods to other DNR ",,,,1174294,97900,,15.5,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2016,1300000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","Fish IBI: In FY16 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish index of biological integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. IBI survey information will be used as part of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)’s watershed assessments for approximately 65 lakes in six major watersheds. Lakes will be identified as impaired or as meeting standards based on the fish IBI. In addition the list of lakes of exceptional biological quality will be updated to help identify which lakes are priorities for protection in the development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will continue to produce stressor ID reports; for lakes with poor fish IBI scores; approximately 30 – 40 lakes are likely to be designated as impaired. Aquatic Plant IBI: In FY16 EWR biologists will organize analyze and deliver aquatic plant data which the MPCA will use to determine whether lakes are meeting water quality standards. We will continue to provide training and technical support to staff in other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant and data and do shoreline habitat surveys. We will target intensive detailed field surveys at 13 priority lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd watershed where there is not enough data to do a quality IBI assessment and we will survey shoreline habitat and delineate emergent plant stands on 47 lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd watershed. This will help us develop additional IBI metrics for non-nutrient stressors. ","Fish: In FY16 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 Fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. About 75 shoreline habitat surveys will be conducted for stressor ID purposes. Fish IBI survey information will be used as part of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)’s watershed assessments for approximately 56 lakes in three major watersheds. Based on the Fish IBI lakes will be designated as impaired or meeting standards. In addition the list of lakes of exceptional biological quality will be updated to help identify which lakes are priorities for protection in the development of Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. We will produce stressor ID reports for six watersheds; for about 25 lakes designated as impaired or vulnerable to future impairment based on their Fish IBI score. Aquatic Plants: In FY16 EWR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data which the MPCA used to determine whether lakes are meeting water quality standards. We provided training and technical support to staff in other DNR programs that collect aquatic plant and data and do shoreline habitat surveys. Specifically we trained 51 DNR Fisheries staff in shoreline habitat survey methods and 50 EWR and Fisheries staff in aquatic plant identification. We targeted intensive detailed field surveys at 13 priority lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd North Fork Crow River Crow Wing River and Sauk River watersheds where there were not enough data to do a quality IBI assessment. We surveyed shoreline habitat on 47 lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd Mississippi River-Grand Rapids and Ottertail River watersheds and delineated emergent plant stands on 47 lakes in the Mississippi River-Brainerd watershed. These data will help us develop additional IBI metrics for non-nutrient stressors.",,,,1165962,155377,,16.7,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2015,1300000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","Fish IBI: In FY15 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish IBI surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. IBI survey information will be used as part of MPCA’s watershed assessments. Using the data collected to date DNR Biologists will work with MPCA to finalize a fish IBI tool for most lake types and develop a Biological Condition Gradient (BCG) Model for Minnesota lakes. We expect to finalize the fish-based IBI and BCG models for most lake types by early 2015. Aquatic Plant IBI: In FY15 DNR biologists will analyze quantitative data collected by DNR Fisheries DNR Wildlife Shallow Lakes Program and DNR EWR's Lakes & Rivers Program as a next step in finalizing an aquatic plant IBI. We will organize analyze and deliver aquatic plant data collected in targeted watersheds for use in MPCA’s watershed assessment process for identifying impaired waters. A manual of standardized aquatic plant survey methods will be completed.","Fish IBI: In FY15 DNR biologists completed 136 fish index of biological integrity (IBI) surveys which included near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in shallow and deep water zones. We also finalized four fish IBI tools and established biological impairment thresholds for the fish IBIs. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) used fish IBI survey information in their watershed assessments for 81 lakes in four major watersheds. Based on the fish IBI lakes were determined to be impaired or meeting standards. We also made a list of lakes of exceptional biological quality which is being used to identify protection priorities in MPCA’s Watershed Restorations and Protection Strategies. We took on a new task of determining which factors are contributing to fish IBI impairments on lakes; we drafted 9 stressor ID reports for the MPCA. Aquatic Plant IBI: In FY15 EWR biologists organized analyzed and delivered aquatic plant data on 152 lakes in priority watersheds. A variety of DNR programs collect lake plant data; we used these data for the plant IBI assessments. To help maintain this important data source we finalized survey protocols for aquatic plant IBI assessments wrote a manual of these standardized survey methods and held training workshops for 150 DNR Fish and Wildlife staff involved in lake plant surveys. In addition we did more detailed in-lake surveys on eight priority lakes in the Rum River Watershed where there was not enough existing plant data to calculate an IBI. Biologists surveyed shoreline habitat and/or delineated emergent plant stands on 25 lakes in the Rum River and Mississippi River-Brainerd watersheds We also made progress enhancing software to gather and manage data which will make it easier for more biologists from other DNR programs to survey shoreline habitat and/or delineate emergent plant stands.",,,,956280,96351,,14.1,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2014,1300000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1300000 the first year and $1300000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments. ","In FY14 DNR biologists will complete approximately 135 fish Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) surveys which include near-shore fish communities and game and nongame fish surveys in the shallow and deep water zones. IBI survey information will be used as part of MPCA’s watershed assessments. Using the data collected to date DNR Biologists will work with MPCA to finalize a fish IBI tool for most lake types and develop a Biological Condition Gradient (BCG) model for Minnesota lakes. We expect to finalize the IBI and BCG models by early 2015. Biologists will also begin work on developing IBI tools for aquatic plants in FY14.","In FY14 DNR biologists completed 124 fish IBI surveys on 121 lakes which include near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish surveys in the shallow and deep water zones. Biologists also developed tools for incorporating fish IBI information into the watershed assessment process in coordination with MPCA. FY14 (primarily summer of 2013) was the first year of transitioning from sampling for tool development to sampling primarily as part of a watershed assessment within the MNPCA schedule. Due to the logistics of working in selected watersheds vs. statewide fewer lakes were sampled. We also increased survey effort on many lakes targeted larger lakes which take more time to sample and added new gear targeting sensitive pelagic fish species on several lakes. In FY14 DNR biologists developed and conducted special IBI vegetation surveys on approximately 20 lakes throughout the state. These surveys were targeted for data collection in the shoreline and near-shore zones where data are currently lacking. Surveys included rapid shoreline habitat assessments delineation of emergent and floating-leaf plant beds and quantitative assessments of in-lake plant communities. A centralized database for these data has been created. ",,,,7574287,142024,,11.08,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2013,1150000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1150000 the first year and $1150000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments including assessment of 400 additional lakes and technical analysis to develop an aquatic plant IBI analysis. The commissioner shall work with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency on the development of an assessment tool.","In FY13 DNR biologists will complete approximately 180 fish IBI surveys on 160 lakes including repeat surveys for quality control. Surveys target the entire fish community including nongame and game fish living in the nearshore area and offshore. IBI survey information will be used as part of PCA’s watershed assessments. Biologists will begin work on developing plant IBI tools.","In FY13 DNR biologists completed 146 fish IBI surveys which include near-shore fish communities as well as game and nongame fish surveys in the shallow and deep water zones. Biologists also developed tools for incorporating fish IBI information into the watershed assessment process in coordination with MPCA. The number of surveys was smaller than originally proposed due to changes in study design to add different methods of fish collection (e.g. vertical gill nets small mesh trap nets electrofishing) and improve efficiency and data quality. An unseasonably cool spring caused water temperatures to be too cool to effectively sample near-shore fish communities.",,,,786648,111048,,13.0,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2012,1150000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(b)","$1150000 the first year and $1150000 the second year are for lake Index of Biological Integrity (IBI) assessments including assessment of 400 additional lakes and technical analysis to develop an aquatic plant IBI analysis. The commissioner shall work with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency on the development of an assessment tool.","In FY12 DNR biologists will complete 200 fish IBI surveys. Surveys target the entire fish community including nongame and game fish living in the nearshore area and offshore. Twenty lakes will receive multiple nearshore surveys per field season for quality control purposes.","In FY12 DNR biologists completed 180 fish IBI surveys on 162 lakes. Surveys target the entire fish community including nongame and game fish living in the nearshore area and offshore Eighteen lakes received additional surveys for quality control purposes. Biologists also developed tools for incorporating fish IBI information into the watershed assessment process in coordination with MPCA.",,,,972395,126390,,14.0,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2011,1178000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY11 DNR biologists will assess 200 lakes for nearshore fish communities along with accompanying littoral zone and pelagic game and nongame fish surveys. Twenty lakes will receive multiple nearshore surveys per field seaon for quality control purposes.","In FY11 DNR biologists completed 228 nearshore assessments on 204 lakes for nearshore fish communities. Littoral and pelagic game and nongame fish surveys were also completed.",,,,1029929,64573,,18.0,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 3617,"Lake Biological Monitoring and Assessments",2010,200000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY10 DNR biologists will assess 60 lakes for nearshore nongame fish populations.","In FY10 DNR biologists assessed 22 lakes for nearshore nongame fish populations. DNR Fisheries management staff were trained to do nearshore nongame fish population assessments in preparation for transition of assessment program from the Division of Ecological and Water Resources to the Division of Fish and Wildlife.",,,,,,,,,,"The biological communities present in a lake are the result of cumulative effects of natural and human-caused influences within the entire area of land and water that flows into the lake (i.e., the watershed). Biological assessments are used on lakes to identify water pollution and habitat concerns based on the type and abundance of selected animals and their habitats. Certain species cannot survive without clean water and healthy habitat while other species are tolerant of degraded conditions. Species that fall into either of these categories are considered indicators of the health of a lake. An index of biological integrity (IBI) is a score that compares the types and numbers of fish, plants or other aquatic life observed in a lake to what is expected for a healthy lake. The DNR has developed fish-based IBI (FIBI) models for assessing lake condition in most Minnesota lakes. FIBI surveys sample the entire fish community, including non-game species which are often more sensitive to watershed and shoreline disturbance. In addition to FIBIs, DNR developed coldwater water quality standards for hundreds of lakes that support habitat for coldwater fishes, many of which are in decline. The FIBI and coldwater standards are used to help the MPCA assess the health of lakes and identify those lakes that may be impacted by nutrients or habitat degradation. The DNR participates in the MPCA watershed assessment process, using biological assessment data and interpretation to identify lakes as impaired or meeting standards, and to identify lakes of exceptional biological quality. We also use the biological assessment data to provide an analysis of the stressors contributing to lake impairments. ","Water pollution in lakes has traditionally been identified using water chemistry or water clarity samples, which give a brief snapshot in time for a limited number of pollutants. Biological standards are a measure of the biological community. They reflect changes to a lake over several years and respond to additional stressors beyond those measured by traditional water chemistry sampling methods. For example, the absence of certain indicator species suggests stress factors that might need further study, such as degraded shoreline habitat or connectivity problems. Together, the biological and chemical assessments provide important information to guide planning and restoration for clean water projects in watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Jacquelyn,Bacigalupi,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","1601 Minneosta Drive",Brainerd,MN,56401,"(218) 203-4315",jacquelyn.bacigalupi@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lake-biological-monitoring-and-assessments,,,, 30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2022,563000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$563,000 the first year and $563,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies on a watershed scale for use in local comprehensive water planning efforts, to provide resources to local governments for activities that protect sources of drinking water, and to enhance approaches that improve the capacity of local governmental units to protect and restore groundwater resources. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,, 30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2021,563000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$563,000 the first year and $563,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies on a watershed scale for use in local comprehensive water planning efforts, to provide resources to local governments for activities that protect sources of drinking water, and to enhance approaches that improve the capacity of local governmental units to protect and restore groundwater resources ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,, 30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2020,550000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 8","$550,000 the first year and $550,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies on a watershed scale for use in local comprehensive water planning efforts, to provide resources to local governments for activities that protect sources of drinking water, and to enhance approaches that improve the capacity of local governmental units to protect and restore groundwater resources. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,, 30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2019,200000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities.  ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,, 30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2018,200000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$200,000 the first year and $200,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities.  ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,191000,9000,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,, 30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2017,125000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$125,000 the first year and $125,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased collaboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,114400,10600,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,, 30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2016,125000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$125,000 the first year and $125,000 the second year are to develop and deliver groundwater restoration and protection strategies for use on a watershed scale for use in local water planning efforts and to provide resources to local governments for drinking water source protection activities.","The proposed outcomes of 2015 efforts is to complete two GRAPS pilot projects. The pilot projects will a) engage local governments and other stakeholders to gather input on how GRAPS can most effectively support local implementation of activities that protect and improve groundwater and drinking water (including the type, format, and delivery of information), b) determine resources and time needed to complete a GRAPS process in a watershed, and c) evaluate the effectiveness of GRAPS as a local groundwater and drinking water planning tool on a watershed scale.",,,,,106725,18275,,1.2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,, 30079,"Local Implementation of Groundwater Strategies",2015,300000,"M.L. 2014, Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 6","$300,000 in 2015 from the Clean Water Fund is to collaborate with the Board of Water and Soil Resources and local units of government in the North and East Metro Groundwater Management Area, Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area, and Straight River Groundwater Management Area and to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas, in cooperation with the Board of Water and Soil Resources, to meet the sustainability standards of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 103G, including Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.287, subdivision 5, and to be available for the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 103H. The update should identify the most critical areas that need protecting. ","Proposed outcomes are updated wellhead protection planning in pilot Groundwater Management Areas, and increased colloboration on groundwater and drinking water protection activities with DNR and BWSR staff and associated programs. ",,,,,256920,43080,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund allow the Minnesota Department of Health to expand and improve the way groundwater and drinking water protection is implemented at the local level. In 2015, $300,000 was allocated to update wellhead protection areas within groundwater management areas. From 2016 onward, funding will be dedicated to the Groundwater Restoration and Protection Strategies (GRAPS) initiative which will provide groundwater and drinking water information and management strategies on a HUC 8 watershed scale. The result of GRAPS will be one coordinated interagency document based on existing state information that can be incorporated into local water management plans. GRAPS will include information to support more effective management of groundwater and drinking water resources in the watershed, including a) an inventory of contaminants and land uses that threaten water resources, b) activities or practices that can be implemented by local resource staff and citizens to protect the quality and quantity of water, c) how to implement strategies in accordance with the “prioritize, target, and measure” framework, and d) how strategies can be implemented to achieve multiple benefits (i.e., also address other resource concerns such as ecological resources, habitat protection, etc.).","Minnesota has adopted a Watershed Approach to assess and manage water resources in the state. Managing ground and surface water together at the watershed level will maximize resources, improve efficiency, and increase collaboration. During a 10-year cycle, state agencies will work in the 81 major watersheds to evaluate water conditions, establish priorities and goals for improvement, and take actions designed to restore or protect water. GRAPS fits into the Watershed Approach for resource planning in Minnesota. ",,2014-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164,(651)201-4648,Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/local-implementation-groundwater-strategies,,,, 37412,"Lower Minnesota River Watershed Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLS) - Phase 2",2017,240207,,,,,,,,,,,0.96,"Tetra Tech Inc","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project will be part of a second phase to develop Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies for several lakes and streams in the watershed. ",,"Lower Minnesota River Watershed ",2016-09-02,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chris,Zadak,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2837",,Assessment/Evaluation,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Carver, Le Sueur, McLeod, Nicollet, Rice, Scott, Sibley",,"Lower Minnesota River ",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/lower-minnesota-river-watershed-total-maximum-daily-loads-tmdls-phase-2,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2021,,N/A,,"This appropriation has now ended. Remaining funds were cancelled due to the May 2020 projected budget shortfall.",,,,,,,,,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2020,,N/A,,"In FY20 the DNR proposes to drill two additional wells monitoring deep bedrock aquifers install two additional data loggers for continuous groundwater level monitoring. DNR will continue to review and publish annual continuous records for the groundwater level monitoring wells in the metro area. DNR will continue to work with SWCD’s in the 11 County Metro Area to aid in our enhanced groundwater monitoring efforts. Plans also include website upgrades to provide data to the website directly from the new hydrologic database. ","In FY20 the DNR acquired 3 shallow aquifer wells from the USGS. Three new data loggers were installed for continuous groundwater level monitoring. DNR reviewed and published continuous water level records for monitoring wells in the metro area. All SWCD’s in the 11 County Metro Area participated in the enhanced groundwater monitoring efforts and uploaded data into the new DNR/PCA cooperative water quantity data management system. The website was upgraded to connect with the new hydrologic database. ",,,,174357,,,2,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2019,,N/A,,"In FY19 the DNR proposes to drill two additional wells in the deep aquifers and install five additional data loggers for continuous groundwater level monitoring. The DNR will continue to refine and expand the groundwater animations to visualize the continuously changing groundwater levels providing a better understanding of water use and aquifer responses in the 11-County Metro Area. DNR will continue to review and publish the annual continuous records for the groundwater level monitoring wells in the metro area.","In FY19 the DNR installed 2 deep aquifer bedrock wells. Thirteen new data loggers were installed for continuous groundwater level monitoring. DNR reviewed and published continuous water level records for monitoring wells in the metro area. All SWCD’s in the 11 County Metro Area participated in the enhanced groundwater monitoring efforts and uploaded data into the new DNR/PCA cooperative water quantity data management system.",,,,252276,74014,,2.4,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2018,,N/A,,"In FY18 DNR proposes to drill five additional wells in the shallow aquifers and install five additional data loggers for continuous groundwater level monitoring. The DNR will continue to refine and expand the groundwater animations to visualize the continuously changing groundwater levels and provide a better understanding of water use and aquifer responses in the 11 County Metro Area. All SWCDs in the 11 County Area will participate in the pilot monitoring partnership in FY18 and a new data system will come on line.","In FY18 the DNR reviewed and published continuous water level records for monitoring wells in the metro area. DNR also developed a metro area water level animation to show monthly changes from 2012-2017. All SWCDs in the 11 County Area participate in the enhanced groundwater monitoring efforts and upload the data into the new DNR/PCA cooperative water quantity data management system. No wells were added to the network in the metro area in FY18 due to limited availability of public property in priority areas.",,,,257210,,,2.7,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2017,,N/A,,"In FY17 the DNR will continue enhancing the processing and accessibility of groundwater network data. Enhancements will include streamlining the gathering storage and online accessibility of data for required groundwater monitoring permits in the 11-county metro and outstate areas with high groundwater appropriation volumes. Additional wells will fill some of the few remaining gaps in the metro groundwater monitoring network and a large effort will begin to transfer data into a new system better equipped to handle these large data sets.","In FY17 DNR installed 15 wells in the metro area including 12 to measure water levels in the deeper aquifers. Twenty new data loggers were installed to continuously measure groundwater levels bringing the total number of instrumented wells in the 11 county area to 216. Our local partner pilot program now includes 10 of the 11 metro county Soil and Water Conservations Districts (SWCD). These partnering SWCDs assist the state in measuring and downloading data in many of the wells in the metro area. The DNR compiled 134 continuous records of groundwater levels and developed a process to show animated changing groundwater levels in the area. The current animation shows monthly changes from 2012-2016. Work began to migrate all groundwater related data to a new data management system.",,,,544050,,,2.9,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2016,,N/A,,"In FY16 the DNR will continue to refine processes and compile continuous records for wells with data loggers. We will replace older model monitoring equipment with state of the art continuous monitoring equipment install additional wells and expand automated Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) data gathering with metro communities focusing on the northeast metro. SCADA information is continuous groundwater use and water level data from a community’s production and monitoring wells managed by a computerized control system. SCADA systems are water supply management systems already in place in most communities. The fact that the DNR can now get this data automatically means that we get better reporting of community water use we can use existing data networks which saves the state money on monitoring costs and that we better understand groundwater use from multiple communities in localized areas.","In FY16 all continuous monitoring equipment was upgraded at existing locations and an additional 132 wells were instrumented with new equipment. Upgrades to the data importing system allowed a more consistent and streamlined process for data entry and storage. The data processing upgrades now allow public access to raw data gathered from the field within two days of data downloads. One additional SCADA system was added to the metro monitoring system. This further enhances the reporting of community water use and reduces monitoring costs through the use of existing community groundwater monitoring.",,,,250690,10793,,2.7,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2015,,N/A,,"In FY15 DNR hydrologists will continue to grow the 11-county monitoring well network by installing 21 monitoring wells 16 of which will be deep wells in bedrock. Additional data analysis will result in better information about aquifer characteristics and trends to be used in groundwater management decisions. The DNR also proposes to add an additional municipality into the automated groundwater data collection project.","In FY15 the DNR installed equipment at White Bear Lake to provide real time water level rain fall and ground water levels from five groundwater observation wells surrounding the lake. These data will provide the public with up to date water level information and improve the understanding of surface and groundwater interactions in the Northeast Metro. We also installed 27 deep aquifer wells instrumented 59 monitoring wells with continuous water level monitoring equipment and compiled 118 annual records for groundwater level monitoring. These records improve understanding about groundwater levels interaction between aquifers and how aquifer levels respond to groundwater use in the 11 County Metro Area – information that is essential for providing sustainable water supplies for people and ecosystems.",,,,410268,,,2.5,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2014,,N/A,,"In FY14 DNR scientists will continue to grow the 11-county monitoring well network by installing 15 monitoring wells 7 of which will be deep wells in bedrock. Additional data analysis will result in better information about aquifer characteristics and trends to be used in groundwater management decisions. The DNR also proposes to further identify the flow patterns and aquifer characteristics within the 11 County Metro through water chemistry sampling and hydraulic testing a subset of the monitoring wells.","In FY14 DNR scientists installed 15 aquifer monitoring wells including 10 in deep bedrock aquifers. Through the well installation process scientists were able to gather valuable information about the bedrock geology and aquifers in the Twin Cities Metro Area. DNR scientists also equipped these 15 new wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. Scientist compiled and completed continuous water level records for 36 wells with continuous data loggers. These wells and data provide information about regionally important aquifers that will improve future management decisions. In FY 14 scientists completed the migration of groundwater data into a state cooperative water data system. The pilot project to test the collection of real-time automated municipal groundwater data continued adding an additional municipality (water level and pumping data from 21 municipal wells used in the community). The public display of these data is under development. When established this public display of groundwater level information will help state scientists and communities better understand local and regional water use and manage future needs.",,,,246082,15045,,2.5,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2013,,N/A,,"In FY13 DNR scientists will continue to grow the 11-county monitoring well network by installing 20 monitoring wells 10 of which will be deep wells in bedrock. Additional data analysis will result in better information about aquifer characteristics and trends to be used in groundwater management decisions.","In FY13 DNR scientists installed 15 aquifer monitoring wells including 4 in deep bedrock aquifers. A change in the field manager for this project resulted in a decrease in well installation from the FY13 target. Through the well installation process scientists were able to gather valuable information about the bedrock geology and aquifers in the Twin Cities Metro Area. Staff also equipped 25 new and existing wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. These wells and data provide information about regionally important aquifers that will improve future management decisions. In FY 13 work continued on the migration of groundwater data into a state cooperative water data system. The pilot project to test the collection of real-time automated municipal groundwater data was completed with one municipality (water level and pumping data from 9 municipal wells) and initiated with a second municipality. The public display of these data is under development. When established this public display of groundwater level information will help state scientists and communities better understand local and regional water use and manage future needs.",,,,516651,74970,,2.3,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2012,1000000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(i)","$1000000 the first year is for implementation of the metropolitan groundwater monitoring and protection activities under Minnesota Laws 2010 chapter 361 article 2 section 4 subdivision 2.","In FY12 DNR scientists will continue establishing a network of monitoring wells in the 11-county metropolitan area to provide information about aquifer characteristics and trends. Staff will install 20 new wells and equip 40 new and existing wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. DNR will also grow our ability to evaluate changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells by installing deep aquifer monitoring wells in the Mt. Simon Aquifer when opportunities arise. The goal for this work is one well per year. Another goal for this program is to complete development of and implement a new automated data management system that will provide better data management and integrate groundwater and surface water data. ","In FY12 DNR scientists installed 28 aquifer monitoring wells including 14 in deep aquifers (installed in bedrock). Through the well installation process scientists were able to gather more and better valuable information about bedrock geology in the Twin Cities Metro Area. Staff equipped 146 new and existing wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. These wells and data loggers provide information about aquifers stressed from pumping providing managers with better information for management decisions. Work began on the migration of data from observations wells (groundwater data) into the surface water data system in order to integrate these two important data sets. A pilot project is underway to test real time automated data collection storage and public display of groundwater data.",,,,570997,142026,,2.5,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 3613,"Metro Area Groundwater Monitoring",2011,4000000,"M.L. 2010 Ch. 361 Art. 2 Sec. 4","The $5000000 appropriated in Laws 2009 chapter 172 article 2 section 4 paragraph (m) for activities relating to groundwater protection or prevention of groundwater degradation is canceled and $4000000 is appropriated in fiscal year 2011 to the commissioner of natural resources for the following purposes: (1) establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11-county metropolitan area that monitors non-stressed systems to provide information on aquifer characteristics and natural water level trends; and (2) develop an automated data system to capture groundwater level and water use data to enhance the evaluation of water resource changes in aquifer systems that are stressed by pumping of existing wells. This is a onetime appropriation and is available until spent. The base funding for this program in fiscal year 2012 is $1000000 and $0 in fiscal year 2013.","In FY11 DNR scientists will establish a network of monitoring wells in the 11-county metropolitan area to provide information about aquifer characteristics and trends. Staff will equip 70 new and existing wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. DNR will also grow our ability to evaluate changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells by installing deep aquifer monitoring wells in the Mt. Simon Aquifer when opportunities arise. The goal for this work is one well per year. Another goal for this program is setting up a new automated data management system that will provide better data management and integrate groundwater and surface water data.","In FY11 DNR scientists installed 14 new monitoring wells in the 11-county metropolitan area and equipped 70 new and existing wells with continuous data loggers to collect groundwater level data. The DNR installed 3 deep aquifer monitoring wells in the Mt. Simon Aquifer. The DNR began work on moving observation well database to a new data system and acquired a new data system to provide store and process groundwater data for use by state and local agencies. This is a cooperative effort between MPCA and the DNR. Initiated pilot project with the Cities of New Brighton Lakeville and Lakeland to develop a mechanism to collect automated water use and ground water level data to provide better water use and availability information for local communities and state needs. ",,,,488836,32400,,,,,"This project will establish a groundwater monitoring network in the 11 county metropolitan area. The network will provide information about aquifer characteristics and natural water trends by monitoring healthy aquifers (non-stressed systems). The project will also develop an automated system that captures groundwater level and water use data. This system will enhance evaluation of changes in aquifers that are stressed by pumping from existing wells.","Many Twin Cities communities rely heavily on groundwater from aquifers for drinking water supplies and other domestic and industrial uses. Some aquifers are showing signs of stress; water use is exceeding aquifer recharge. Monitoring wells are the only way to get the information needed to understand the effect of pumping and land use changes so that these aquifers can be managed sustainably into the future. ",,2010-07-01,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,"Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Washington, Wright, Sherburne",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/metro-area-groundwater-monitoring,,,, 37623,"Middle Fork Crow River Watershed District Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG)",2017,152717,,,,,,,,,,,1.26,"Middle Fork Crow River Watershed District","Local/Regional Government","The purpose of this monitoring project is to maintain water quality data collection, build upon existing data for Phase II of the Intensive Watershed Monitoring approach, and develop a better understanding of what impacts the rivers located in central Minnesota specifically in the North Fork Crow Watershed. This project will collect water samples at fifteen (15) stream and twenty-six (26) lake locations in the North Fork Crow River watershed. Several staff is needed to make this project happen. Staff from Crow River Organization of Water (CROW), Middle Fork Crow River Watershed District (MFCRWD), and North Fork Crow River Watershed District (NFCRWD) will come together and implement a monitoring program in the North Fork Crow River watershed. This project has three basic objectives: water quality monitoring, data management, and administration. This project is anticipated to start March 2017 conclude in January 2019.",,"Surface Water Assessment Grants ",2017-03-06,2019-01-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Margaret,Johnson,"Middle Fork Crow River Watershed District","189 County Road 8 NE",Spicer,MN,56288,"(320) 796-0888",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Hennepin, Kandiyohi, Meeker, Pope, Stearns, Wright",,"North Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/middle-fork-crow-river-watershed-district-surface-water-assessment-grant-swag,,,, 37428,"Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) Calculator Updates",2017,10246,,,,,,,,,,,.04,"Barr Engineering Co.","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project is to update stormwater harvest/reuse best management practices (BMPs) in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) calculator. The update will also allow the calculator to utilize Excel files from previous of the tool. ",,,2016-10-03,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mike,Trojan,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2790",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minimal-impact-design-standards-mids-calculator-updates,,,, 37428,"Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) Calculator Updates",2018,3171,,,,,,,,,,,.01,"Barr Engineering Co.","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project is to update stormwater harvest/reuse best management practices (BMPs) in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) calculator. The update will also allow the calculator to utilize Excel files from previous of the tool. ",,,2016-10-03,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Mike,Trojan,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2790",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minimal-impact-design-standards-mids-calculator-updates,,,, 23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2020,250000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 8","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for evaluating and addressing the risks from viruses, bacteria, and protozoa in groundwater supplies and for evaluating land uses that may contribute to contamination of public water systems with these pathogens. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,, 23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2019,100000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for evaluating and addressing the risks from viruses in water supplies. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,, 23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2018,100000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8","$100,000 the first year and $100,000 the second year are for evaluating and addressing the risks from viruses in water supplies. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,, 23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2017,75000,,"275,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,, 23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2016,275000,,"275,000 the first year and $75,000 the second year are for development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. ",,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,, 23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2015,800000,"MN Law 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 8(g)","$800,000 the first year and $800,000 second year are for the development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2017. ","-An estimated virus occurrence rate in Minnesota's public water supply wells -Knowledge of virus occurrence and associations with critical factors and indicators -Enhanced groundwater microbial risk management guidance -Guidance to public water systems on how to implement risk management measures if pathogens are present ",,,,,685120,114880,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,, 23164,"Minnesota Groundwater Virus Study",2014,800000,"MN Law 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 8(g)","$800,000 the first year and $800,000 second year are for the development and implementation of a groundwater virus monitoring plan, including an epidemiological study to determine the association between groundwater virus concentration and community illness rates. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2017. ",,,,66000,"United States Geological Survey (USGS) ",800000,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The objective of this project is to build on previous efforts aimed at determining the public health risk due to virus contamination in Minnesota groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Health will examine the occurrence of viruses in non-disinfecting groundwater sources in Minnesota as well as evaluate the association between source water virus occurrence and community acute gastrointestinal illness. The results will contribute to the scientific understanding of viruses in groundwater in Minnesota and will be used to develop and improve health-based guidance tools to reduce the public health risk from viruses in groundwater drinking water sources.","Waterborne viral illness outbreaks have been associated with groundwater sources (Brunkard et al. 2011). National surveys have shown that approximately 30% of drinking water wells may be contaminated with human pathogenic viruses (Abbaszadegan et al. 2003). However, it is unknown whether these viral contaminants are responsible for a significant proportion of endemic (non-outbreak) illness, or if they are responsible for outbreaks with no known cause. Previous studies to examine occurrence of viruses in drinking water in Minnesota have been limited. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lih-in,Rezania,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4661,lih-in.rezania@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-groundwater-virus-study,,,, 37650,"Minnesota River E. Coli Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Development ",2017,68033,,,,,,,,,,,0.3,"Tetra Tech Inc","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project addresses five reaches of the Minnesota River that have aquatic recreation impairments as identified by high concentrations of E. coli. The project will describe the water quality impairments, complete pollutant source assessments, establish loading capacities and allocations for the impairments, and develop implementation strategies. ",,"Blue Earth River Watershed Chippewa River Watershed Cottonwood River Watershed Le Sueur River Watershed Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River Watershed Minnesota River - Mankato Watershed Lower Minnesota River Watershed Redwood River Watershed Watonwan River Watershed   ",2017-03-10,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chris,Zadak,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2837",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Carver, Chippewa, Cottonwood, Douglas, Faribault, Freeborn, Grant, Kandiyohi, Lac qui Parle, Le Sueur, Lincoln, Lyon, Martin, McLeod, Murray, Nicollet, Pipestone, Pope, Redwood, Renville, Scott, Sibley, Steele, Stevens, Swift, Waseca, Watonwan, Yellow Medicine",,"Blue Earth River, Chippewa River, Cottonwood River, Le Sueur River, Lower Minnesota River , Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Redwood River, Watonwan River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-river-e-coli-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-and-watershed-restoration-and-protecti,,,, 33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2015,1006016,,,,,,,,,,,10.06,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,, 33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2016,949674,,,,,,,,,,,9.5,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,, 33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2017,857306,,,,,,,,,,,8.57,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,, 33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2018,671276,,,,,,,,,,,6.71,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,, 33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2019,627518,,,,,,,,,,,6.26,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,, 33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2020,557216,,,,,,,,,,,5.57,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,, 33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2021,406073,,,,,,,,,,,4.06,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,, 33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2022,526159,,,,,,,,,,,5.26,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,, 33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2023,524139,,,,,,,,,,,5.2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,, 33246,"Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Lab Analysis",2024,802930,,,,,,,,,,,8,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) will conduct water sample analysis and collect data for the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to meet the requirements of the MPCA’s environmental programs.",,,2014-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Kelly,O'Hara,"MPCA ST. Paul Office","520 Lafayette Road N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 247-1054",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-department-health-mdh-lab-analysis,,,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2025,3500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (f) $3,500,000 the first year and $3,500,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2024,3500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (f) $3,500,000 the first year and $3,500,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","The following measures are cumulative over the life of the program. As of June 30, 2024: 1,511 certified farms 1,036,362 current certified acres 2,929 NEW best management practices $92,985,493 has been leveraged ",,3985089,,3179150,237749,,6.43,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2023,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","As of June 30, 2023: 1,374 certified farms 938,851 certified acres 2,239 NEW best management practices 41 partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP $22,100,041 have been leveraged  ",,3652458,,2784558,245618,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2022,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","As of June 20, 2022: 1,240 certified farms 892,578 certified acres 2,478 NEW best management practices 38 partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP $18,466,583 have been leveraged  ",,2804342,,2589035,218389,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2021,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2024. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","See the most recent fiscal year for current measures. ",,2322917,,2527276,270880,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2020,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: f) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2024. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Number of partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP Funds Leveraged  ","As of December 7, 2020: 977 certified farms 685,767 certified acres 1,998 NEW Best Management Practices 30 partners engaged in promotion and delivery of MAWQCP $13,319,324 have been leveraged ",,2173217,,2388875,223105,,5.7,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2019,3000000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (g) $2,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2021. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,2235826,,2200855,188333,,5.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2018,2000000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (g) $2,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2021 ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","At the end of December 2018: Over 690 certified farms More than 449,000 certified acres 1328 NEW Best Management Practices, saving 127 million pounds of soil per year and reducing nitrogen and phosphorus losses. 55-65% of program funds are passed through to local government units and participating farmers: The program is leveraging over $9 million in federal funding to enhance programs in Minnesota ",,2075640,,2217983,221531,,5.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2017,2500000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3S F2527 REVISOR CKM S2527-2 2nd Engrossment (05/22/2016) Starting on line 66.29 ","M.L. 2015: (g) $2,500,000 the first year is and $2,500,000 the second year are to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. The commissioner of agriculture shall consult with the United States Department of Agriculture to determine whether other state spending would qualify as a match for the agricultural water quality certification program funds available from the federal government. By January 1, 2016, the commissioner shall submit a report on funding recommendations to the Clean Water Council and the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over agriculture, the  environment and natural resources, and the clean water fund. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2019. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,1982130,,2060920,195404,,5.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2016,2500000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (g) $2,500,000 the first year is to implement the Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program statewide. The commissioner of agriculture shall consult with the United States Department of Agriculture to determine whether other state spending would qualify as a match for the agricultural water quality certification program funds available from the federal government. By January 1, 2016, the commissioner shall submit a report on funding recommendations to the Clean Water Council and the chairs and ranking minority members of the house of representatives and senate committees and divisions with jurisdiction over agriculture, the environment and natural resources, and the clean water fund. Funds appropriated in this paragraph are available until June 30, 2016, and the commissioner may request additional funding for this program for fiscal year 2017. ","The following measures are tracked for the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Conservation Program. The values reported are cumulative over the life of the program. Number of certified farms Number of certified acres Number of NEW best management practices Percent of program funds passed through to local government units. Funds Leveraged  ","• 327 certified farms • 188,153 certified acres • 555 NEW Best Management Practices 65% of program funds are passed through to local government units: -The program is leveraging over $9 million in federal funding to enhance programs in Minnesota. -The program is supporting 8 non-MDA positions. ",,1800000,,1803394,222364,,5.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2015,1500000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (g) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are to implement a Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Measurable outcomes are reported in fiscal year 2014 ","Measurable outcomes are reported in fiscal year 2014 ",,1501256,"$9M NRCS Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP)$100,000 McKnight Foundation$3M dedicated EQIP funding pool ",710340,180563,,3.75,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2014,1500000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (g) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are to implement a Minnesota agricultural water quality certification program. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Measureable outcomes were proposed in fiscal year 2012 and have remained consistent. ","• Number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and other stakeholders at field days, presentations and other education events (Over 120 meetings, events, fields days, and presentations at conferences and tradeshows)• Number of farmers participating in the MAWQCP in each pilot area within the term of the pilot program (31 certified farms, 12,861 acres)• Number of conservation practices implemented (84)• Number of partners involved in local pilots’ activities (15)Buffalo-Red River Watershed District, Wilkin County SWCD, West Otter Tail County SWCD, Whitewater River Watershed Project, Wabasha County SWCD, Winona County SWCD, Olmsted County SWCD, Rural Advantage, Martin County SWCD, Jackson County SWCD, Cottonwood County SWCD, Watonwan County SWCD, Faribault County SWCD, Greater Blue Earth River Basin Alliance, Stearn County SWCD• Amount of money leveraged by the MAWQCP ($12.1 million) ",,1501256,,276712,49598,,"3.75 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2013,132830,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2011: (d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Measureable outcomes were proposed in fiscal year 2012 and have remained consistent. ","These measures are reported as a cumulative over the years of the program. For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,50000,,,132830,,0.85,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 9773,"Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program",2012,173380,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","The MDA is tracking the following information: Number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and other stakeholders at field days, presentations and other education events Number of farmers participating in the MAWQCP in each pilot area within the term of the pilot program Number of conservation practices implemented Number of partners involved in local pilots’ activities Amount of money leveraged by the MAWQCP Upon two-years of pilot operation: a. Have developed an agricultural operation assessment process that functionally addresses water quality impacts and incorporates a process for revisions as practices, management and technology changes become established and approved.  ","Measurable outcomes are reported in fiscal year 2014. These measures are reported as a cumulative over the years of the program. For up to date information please see the most recent fiscal year. ",,,"Additional federal and state resources for this program will be identified by the advisory committee as well as the Minnesota Department of Agriculture. ",,,,0.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture and Multiple local partners","Local/Regional Government, State Government","The Minnesota Ag Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a voluntary opportunity for farmers and agricultural landowners to take the lead on implementing conservation practices that protect water quality. Those who implement and maintain approved conservation practices will be certified and in turn obtain regulatory certainty for a period of ten years. This program will help address concerns about changing regulatory requirements from multiple state and federal agencies. Certainty is a commitment provided by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR), and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). For more details about  the program, please visit the Ag Water Quality Certification Program webpage on the MDA's website. ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program began certifying farms in pilot watershed areas in June of 2014, and began certifying farms statewide in July 2015. As of February 3, 2025, there are 1,583 certified farms that represent 1,103,811 current acres. An additional 2,968 new conservation practices are being adopted as a result of this program. Over the lifetime of the program 1,115,572 acres have been certified.   ","The Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program (MAWQCP) is a first of its kind, voluntary program that supports the implementation of conservation practices on a field-by-field, whole farm basis. Through its innovative and nationally recognized process of identifying and mitigating agricultural risks to water quality, the MAWQCP delivers on-farm conservation that helps protect and restore Minnesota’s lakes, rivers, streams, and groundwater. The MAWQCP is a national demonstration project that is operated as a federal-state partnership between the State of Minnesota, the United States Department of Agriculture, and Minnesota’s 88 soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs). The certification program has also partnered with industry leaders including Land O’ Lakes Inc., Hormel Foods, and Central Farm Service to promote the program and enroll additional acreage. Farmers and landowners who treat all risks to water quality on their operation are certified and are deemed to be in compliance with any new water quality laws or rules for 10 years. Certification gives farmers and the public greater certainty about regulatory standards and assures the public that Minnesota’s farmers are doing their part to protect water quality. ",2012-01-17,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Brad,"Jordahl Redlin","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201- 6489",Brad.JordahlRedlin@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","MWQCP Logo",Statewide,,"Big Fork River, Blue Earth River, Bois de Sioux River, Buffalo River, Cannon River, Chippewa River, Clearwater River, Cloquet River, Cottonwood River, Crow Wing River, Des Moines River - Headwaters, Kettle River, Lac qui Parle River, Lake of the Woods, Le Sueur River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Lower Big Sioux River, Lower Minnesota River , Lower St. Croix River, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Lake Pepin, Mississippi River - Twin Cities, Mustinka River, Otter Tail River, Pomme de Terre River, Red Lake River, Redeye River, Redwood River, Rock River, Root River, Roseau River, Rum River, Sauk River, Snake River, South Fork Crow River, St. Louis River, Statewide, Thief River, Two Rivers, Upper St. Croix River, Watonwan River, Zumbro River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-agricultural-water-quality-certification-program,"The members of the 2024-2026 MAWQCP Advisory Committee are: Anne Schwagerl, Minnesota Farmers Union, MAWQCP Certified Producer Ariel Kagan, Minnesota Farmers Union Bryan Biegler, Minnesota Corn Growers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Dennis Fuchs, Stearns County SWCD Eric Sannerud, MAWQCP Certified Producer Joe Smentek, Minnesota Soybean Growers Association John Beaton, Fairhaven Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Leif Fixen, The Nature Conservancy Lori Cox, Roots Return Heritage Farm, MAWQCP Certified Producer Lucas Sjostrom, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, MAWQCP Certified Producer Nathan Collins, Minnesota Farm Bureau, MAWQCP Certified Producer Spencer Herbert, Land O'Lakes Truterra Steve Peterson, retired - General Mills, HASP co-chair, MAWQCP Certified Producer Tom Raymond, Hormel Foods Trent Wimmer, Syngenta Whitney Place, University of Minnesota Extension ",,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2025,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development or support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2024,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development or support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ","The following numbers are cumulative from FY18 through FY24. As of June 30, 2024 the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library has: 3,840 publications (diverse research articles and scientific reports) 32,700 website visitors 5,046 PDF downloads ",,,,48674,6136,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2023,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development for support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,,56405,7846,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2022,40000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(e) $40,000 the first year and $40,000 the second year are for maintenance of the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Costs for information technology development for support for the digital library may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. ",," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,36129,4448,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2021,50000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","(e) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted Number of PDF downloads ",,,,,34849,4722,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2020,50000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (e) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","The following measures are reported cumulatively, as of 11/12/2020: 3,251 publications are available online 13,918 visitors have visited the site  13,031 searches were conducted 3,871 publications were downloaded ",,,,33132,4970,,0.6,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2019,50000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022 "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,38523,3302,,0.6,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2018,50000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","As of January 3, 2019: 2915 publications available Estimated number of website visitors: Since inception: Total = 10,001 2018:  Total = 1500   Estimated number of search sessions: Since inception: 11,458 2018:  2957 Estimated Number of pdf downloads: Since inception: 3576 2018:  614 ",,,,61488,7420,,0.6,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2017,50000,"M.L. 2015: 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for the most up to date information. ",,,,48895,7316,,0.3,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2016,50000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3 ","M.L. 2015: (f) $50,000 the first year and $50,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Costs for information technology development or support for this research inventory database may be paid to the Office of MN.IT Services. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","For Fiscal Year 2016: Number of publications: 1,393 Number of website visitors New visitors: 2,561 Total visitors: 2,885 Number of search sessions conducted: 2,885 Number of PDF downloads: 535 ",,,,9119,6497,,0.3,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2015,150000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (f) $100,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Any information technology development or support or costs necessary for this research inventory database will be incorporated into the agency's service level agreement with and paid to the Office of Enterprise Technology. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","For Fiscal Year 2015: Number of publications: 1,376 Number of website visitors New visitors: 2,590 Total visitors: 3,419 Number of search sessions conducted: 3,423 Number of PDF downloads: 639 ",,,,66584,35474,"Groups represented by the Steering Team (September 2014- Current): • Buffalo-Red Watershed District Board • Freshwater Society • Metropolitan Council • Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources • Minnesota Corn Growers • Minnesota Department of Agriculture • Minnesota Department of Health • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Minnesota State University Water Resource Center • Mississippi Watershed Management Organization • Pelican River Watershed District • U.S. Geological Survey - Minnesota Water Science Center • University of Minnesota Libraries • University of Minnesota Water Resources Center • Washington County Conservation District * this is a voluntary steering committee, not a board",1,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2014,100000,"M.L. 2013: Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013: (f) $100,000 the first year and $150,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. Any information technology development or support or costs necessary for this research inventory database will be incorporated into the agency's service level agreement with and paid to the Office of Enterprise Technology. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","In FY14, MDA staff completed development and performance testing of the MnWRL website and populated the website with diverse water research publciations. The website went live with over 1,000 articles searchable by the public. MDA staff also established a diverse Steering Team to help guide MnWRL’s long-term growth and maintenance. Number of publications (1,361) Estimated number of website visitors (2,257) Estimated number of search sessions conducted (1,219) Estimated number of new webiste visitors (679) Number of article downloads (396) ",,,,114514,16309,"Groups represented by the Advisory Committee (May 2011- December 2013): • EOR Inc. • Houston Engineering • Keiser & Associates LLC • Metropolitan Council • Minnesota Agricultural Water Resources Center • Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources • Minnesota Corn Growers • Minnesota Department of Agriculture • Minnesota Department of Health • Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Minnesota State University Water Resource Center • Mississippi Watershed Management Organization • Ramsey Washington Metro Watershed District • U.S. Geological Survey - Minnesota Water Science Center • University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics • University of Minnesota Department of Soil Water & Climate • University of Minnesota Libraries • University of Minnesota Water Resources Center • USDA Agricultural Research Service • Washington County Conservation District * this is a voluntary advisory committee, not a board",1,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2013,175000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (f) $175,000 the first year and $175,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for the most up to date information. ",,,,,2700,"See Fiscal Year 2014","1 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2012,175000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (f) $175,000 the first year and $175,000 the second year are for a research inventory database containing water-related research activities. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,,810,"See Fiscal Year 2014",0.3,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 2998,"Minnesota Water Research Digital Library",2010,85000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (d) $695,000 the first year and $1,570,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance related to ways agricultural practices contribute to restoring impaired waters and assist with the development of TMDL plans. "," Number of publications Number of website visitors Number of search sessions conducted: Number of PDF downloads ","Please see the most recent fiscal year for up to date information. ",,,,,,"See Fiscal Year 2014",,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Minnesota Water Research Digital Library Water Research Inventory Database The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library (MnWRL) is a user-friendly, searchable inventory of water research relevant to Minnesota. It includes both peer-reviewed articles as well as white papers and reports. The Library provides 'one-stop' access to all types of water research. The Minnesota Water Research Digital Library is now fully functional and available online. Currently it is populated with over 3,100 diverse scientific research articles and project reports. Clean Water funds will be used to continue populating and managing the database in partnership with other state agencies and organizations. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) will provide support and training for partner organizations and conduct intensive outreach to Minnesota's water research communities as well as the general public. What is the status of the project? In 2018, changes were made to the MnWRL website to enhance the user experience with a wide range of search and filter tools. Visitors can browse by categories, find recently added or featured items, and do an advanced search using document descriptors and full document text.  ","This project established a centralized digital library of articles on water research in or relevant to Minnesota. The digital library gives water resource professionals, researchers, funders and the public quick access to a wealth of information that was previously scattered or hard to find. Users are able to search for literature on a wide range of water topics and submit water research reports to be shared with others.   MnWRL increases research accessibility and coordination and ensures full utilization of decades of water research that supports Minnesota’s groundwater and surface water assessment, protection and restoration activities. Organizing information about research projects in a single place will make it easier to find results and coordinate research efforts. ","In 2011, a project advisory committee was formed. This committee provided input on questions regarding the scope of material to be included and the types of searchable attributes in the Digital Library. During 2011, a high-level design was completed, including a data model and more than 100 draft screens (windows) for data entry, public searches, and database reporting and maintenance. In 2012, the data model was refined and the highest priority screens were developed. A preliminary, non-public version of the Water Research Digital Library was tested in the fall. In 2013, the Digital Library was populated with a ""starter-set"" of articles. In the spring of 2014, MnWRL was made available online. An ongoing program of comprehensive, targeted outreach efforts will ensure that water planners, landowners, researchers, and citizens throughout Minnesota know about this resource. While the project to establish the Digital Library concluded in 2014, the MDA and partner organizations will continue to build, maintain and improve it overtime. In 2016, MnWRL staff at MDA developed a partnership agreement template, met with potential state agency and academic partners, and secured a partnership internally with the Pesticide and Fertilizer Management Division for curation and entry of publications and data. In 2014 a Steering Team representing diverse organizations and stakeholders was organized to provide guidance on planning and operations of MnWRL. The Steering Team continues to meet quarterly to discuss work plans, promotion, partnership policies, and scope policies. ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Stephen,Roos,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street N.","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-201-6631,stephan.roos@state.mn.us,Inventory,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/minnesota-water-research-digital-library,,,, 19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2014,1000000,,,,,,,,,,,5,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,, 19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2015,1000000,,,,,,,,,,,5,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,, 19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2016,784501,,,,,,,,,,,1.01,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,, 19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2017,1215690,,,,,,,,,,,2.16,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,, 19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2018,333620,,,,,,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,, 19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2019,242494,,,,,,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,, 19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2020,55500,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,, 19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2021,83227,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,, 19443,"MPCA Watershed Data Integration Development Project- TMDL Research Enhanced Database",2023,27560,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) uses a watershed-oriented approach to assess surface water quality and define restoration and protection measures. Each of Minnesota's 81 major watersheds is assessed intensively every 10 years, based on a staggered schedule that addresses, on average, eight watersheds per year.  To increase the amount of data directly available to the public online, and to make internal operations more efficient, the MPCA started a multi-year Watershed Data Integration Project (WDIP). ",,,2013-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2730",,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-watershed-data-integration-development-project-tmdl-research-enhanced-database,,,, 36597,"MPCA Stormwater BMP Performance Evaluation and Technology Transfer Program",2016,275000,,,,,,,,,,,,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project will evaluate best management performance and effectiveness to support meeting total maximum daily loads; develop standards and incorporate state of the art guidance using minimal impact design standards as the model; and implement a knowledge and technology transfer system across local government, industry, and regulatory sectors. ",,,2016-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,David,Fairbairn,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,(651)757-2659,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-bmp-performance-evaluation-and-technology-transfer-program,,,, 36597,"MPCA Stormwater BMP Performance Evaluation and Technology Transfer Program",2017,275000,,,,,,,,,,,,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project will evaluate best management performance and effectiveness to support meeting total maximum daily loads; develop standards and incorporate state of the art guidance using minimal impact design standards as the model; and implement a knowledge and technology transfer system across local government, industry, and regulatory sectors. ",,,2016-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,David,Fairbairn,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,(651)757-2659,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-bmp-performance-evaluation-and-technology-transfer-program,,,, 28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2014,162243,,,,,,,,,,,1.48,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,, 28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2015,171456,,,,,,,,,,,1.57,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,, 28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2016,154632,,,,,,,,,,,.97,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,, 28164,"MPCA Stormwater Research & Tool Development Activities",2017,394892,,,,,,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support to evaluate the performance of existing stormwater infiltration sites, as identified in the Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) project. Monitor the range of existing infiltration devices in Minnesota and compare to design criteria, maintenance records, and quantify year-round infiltration rates. Develop and refine pretreatment options and standards for municipal stormwater treatment. ",,,2013-07-01,2017-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Ryan,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155-,,,"Assessment/Evaluation, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-stormwater-research-tool-development-activities,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2014,4105849,,,,,,,,,,,38,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2015,4173501,,,,,,,,,,,33,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2016,5309905,,,,,,,,,,,33.81,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2017,6028498,,,,,,,,,,,35.16,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2018,5481766,,,,,,,,,,,35.11,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2019,5866668,,,,,,,,,,,34.44,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2020,5513679,,,,,,,,,,,35.34,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2021,5289006,,,,,,,,,,,32.94,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2022,5231367,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(b)",,,,,,,,,,33.55,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2023,5583937,,,,,,,,,,,34.62,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 23877,"MPCA Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Technical Assistance/Project Oversight ",2024,5503333,,,,,,,,,,,32.69,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports activities by Minnesota Pollution Control (MPCA) Watershed Division staff that provide technical assistance, project oversight, coordination, outreach and other agency activities associated with assessing, listing and conducting Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies throughout the State of Minnesota. Project also includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with TMDL work at the MPCA. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Glenn,Skuta,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","St. Paul",MN,55155,651-757-2730,glenn.skuta@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Monitoring, Planning, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl-technical-assistanceproject-oversight,,,, 36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2016,5351892,,,,,,,,,,,44.85,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,, 36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2017,5528098,,,,,,,,,,,40.82,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,, 36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2018,5477821,,,,,,,,,,,41.76,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,, 36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2019,5529246,,,,,,,,,,,40.78,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,, 36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2020,5483925,,,,,,,,,,,40.27,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,, 36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2021,5284366,,,,,,,,,,,35,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,, 36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2022,4956185,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(a)",,,,,,,,,,35.02,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,, 36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2023,5413432,,,,,,,,,,,36.52,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,, 36598,"MPCA Water Monitoring Section Activities",2024,5971189,,,,,,,,,,,35.27,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, and fieldwork expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities within the described priority watersheds. Lake Monitoring: Lakes are monitored for nutrients, clarity and other information to provide the data needed to assess the aquatic recreation use support. Biological and Water Chemistry Stream Monitoring: Monitoring to assess the conditions of streams in each watershed. Monitoring includes biological (fish and invertebrates), chemical (nutrients, sediments, etc.) and physical (habitat) measurements. Watershed Pollutant Load Monitoring Network: (Watershed-Statewide): The watershed pollutant load monitoring effort provides data on water quality conditions and trends for Minnesota's major rivers and their main tributaries. Ambient wetland monitoring: The goals of the ambient wetland monitoring effort are to assess status and trends of wetland conditions. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Pam,Anderson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2190",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Monitoring","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-water-monitoring-section-activities,,,, 10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2016,53114,,,,,,,,,,,0.5,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,, 10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2017,80816,,,,,,,,,,,.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,, 10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2018,182975,,,,,,,,,,,1.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,, 10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2019,386663,,,,,,,,,,,3.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,, 10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2020,262427,,,,,,,,,,,2.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,, 10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2021,215721,,,,,,,,,,,2.1,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,, 10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2022,288794,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(d)",,,,,,,,,,.87,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,, 10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2023,279451,,,,,,,,,,,.84,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,, 10018151,"MPCA St. Louis River Area of Concern (AOC) Remediation Support Activities",2024,372553,,,,,,,,,,,1.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Agencies and stakeholders are working together to clean up contaminated sediments and restore aquatic habitat to the estuary in the St. Louis River Area of Concern within the Great Lakes Basin. ","More information: https://www.pca.state.mn.us/waste/st-louis-river-area-concern-resources ",,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Huberty,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road N","St. Paul",MN,55155,,,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-st-louis-river-area-concern-aoc-remediation-support-activities,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2014,691911,,,,,,,,,,,6.21,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2015,831629,,,,,,,,,,,7.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2016,755618,,,,,,,,,,,5.75,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2017,764768,,,,,,,,,,,5.61,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2018,743626,,,,,,,,,,,5.14,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2019,821313,,,,,,,,,,,5.8,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2020,772185,,,,,,,,,,,5.22,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2021,874046,,,,,,,,,,,5.61,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2022,887226,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(e)",,,,,,,,,,5.67,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2023,883851,,,,,,,,,,,5.45,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 28161,"MPCA National Pollutant Discharge System Waste/Stormwater Total Maximum Daily Load Activities",2024,1092756,,,,,,,,,,,6.4,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Staffing support for the development of permits that provide for implementation of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) requirements at wastewater facilities and stormwater permittees. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dana,Vanderbosch,"Municipal Division Director, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,,dana.vanderbosch@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-national-pollutant-discharge-system-wastestormwater-total-maximum-daily-load-activitie,,,, 36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2016,567922,,,,,,,,,,,3.29,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,, 36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2017,620426,,,,,,,,,,,3.83,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,, 36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2018,693557,,,,,,,,,,,4.21,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,, 36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2019,632044,,,,,,,,,,,3.54,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,, 36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2020,671209,,,,,,,,,,,4.4,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,, 36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2021,677851,,,,,,,,,,,3.24,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,, 36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2022,600617,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(c)",,,,,,,,,,3.51,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,, 36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2023,591495,,,,,,,,,,,3.42,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,, 36596,"MPCA Ambient Groundwater Activities",2024,628687,,,,,,,,,,,3.53,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","This project supports monitoring and assessment activities by Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) Environmental Outcomes staff and includes lab analysis, equipment, fieldwork, data management, and interpretation expenses associated with monitoring and assessment activities. The ambient groundwater monitoring network describes the current condition and trends in Minnesota's groundwater quality. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,"Sharon ","Kroening ","MInnesota Pollution Control Agency ","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2507",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-ambient-groundwater-activities-2016,,,, 10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2016,853501,,,,,,,,,,,3.21,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,, 10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2017,1205491,,,,,,,,,,,3.24,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,, 10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2018,798114,,,,,,,,,,,1.87,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,, 10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2019,719141,,,,,,,,,,,1.32,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,, 10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2020,235001,,,,,,,,,,,1.73,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,, 10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2021,164683,,,,,,,,,,,1.39,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,, 10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2022,200292,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(f)",,,,,,,,,,1.25,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,, 10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2023,215932,,,,,,,,,,,1.45,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,, 10008298,"MPCA Subsurface Sewage Treatment System (SSTS) Program Activities",2024,180681,,,,,,,,,,,.91,"MInnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","Support for the subsurface sewage treatment system (SSTS)  program administered by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). The MPCA offers grants to counties for SSTS program administration and special projects to improve SSTS compliance rates, and assistance for low-income homeowners with needed SSTS upgrades. ",,,2016-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Aaron,Jensen,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ",,"520 Lafayette Rd N",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2544",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-subsurface-sewage-treatment-system-ssts-program-activities,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2014,33940,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2015,39346,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2016,47631,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2017,46084,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2018,50000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2019,41424,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2020,53427,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2021,68378,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2022,285633,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(j)",,,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2023,298802,,,,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37823,"MPCA Clean Water Council Operations",2024,342506,,,,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","State Government","The Clean Water Council was created through the Clean Water Legacy Act (Minn. Stat. Ch 114D) which was signed into law June 2, 2006. The council’s role is to advise on the administration and implementation of the Clean Water Legacy Act. See the Council’s FY18-19 Clean Water Fund and Policy Recommendations Report (December 1, 2016). The 28-member Clean Water Council (Council) represents organizations with a major role in achieving clean water, enabling consensus building and coordination on a wide array of issues critical to the people of Minnesota. The Council holds meetings monthly to discuss a variety of water topics. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Paul,Gardner,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Road North ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",Paul.Gardner@state.mn.us,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/mpca-clean-water-council-operations,,,, 37442,"Municipal Stormwater Inspector Workshops ",2017,4405,,,,,,,,,,,0.44,"Minnesota Erosion Control Association","For-Profit Business/Entity","Minnesota Erosion Control Association (MECA) will offer three one-day training session intended to educate permittees on the requirements of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. The focus of these workshops will be on conducting inspections and various hot topics. ",,"Municipal Stormwater (MS4) ",2017-01-27,2017-10-29,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Anne,Gelbmann,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2384",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Blue Earth, Kandiyohi, Wright",,"Blue Earth River, Chippewa River, Le Sueur River, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, North Fork Crow River, South Fork Crow River, Watonwan River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/municipal-stormwater-inspector-workshops,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2025,1600000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(f)","$1,600,000 the first year and $1,600,000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities and targeted forest stewardship for water quality. ","Watershed planning and site-scale technical assistance: Continue using our hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity data, analyses and expertise to contribute to CWMPs and to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of actual, planned, or proposed on-the-ground water quality/water management projects, including projects identified as priorities in approved Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CWMPs). Work with local partners to write 40 forest stewardship plans covering 2,600 woodland acres, with cost share and technical assistance for around 90 projects on 400 to 750 acres to improve water quality in priority areas identified in Landscape Stewardship Plans and CWMPs for four southeastern MN watersheds. Plant trees in four central MN watersheds where tree planting is an identified priority. Information resources: Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related datasets. Continue helping local 1W1P partnerships and groups like the Northern Waters Land Trust, Minnesota Land Trust, and Natural Shorelines Partnership use this information to prioritize lakes for protection. Continue helping local partners develop and apply higher water quality standards in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Develop and coordinate a lake resiliency and climate change conference for LGUs. Collaborate with the UM Climate Adaptation Partnership to develop training to help agency staff communicate with LGUs about climate change impacts on water quality and the need to act. Continue technical guidance for the interagency fish contamination assessment program and help migrate historical data to MPCA for public access. Watershed science outreach: Continue outreach on the science of watershed health to help implementers and practitioners understand root causes of water quality problems and apply multiple-benefit solutions.   ",,,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2024,1600000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(f)","$1,600,000 the first year and $1,600,000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities and targeted forest stewardship for water quality. "," Watershed planning: Participate in all 15 to 20 One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects in progress to develop or update Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CWMPs) by contributing relevant data and information and reviewing plans. Implementation technical assistance: Continue building on our participation in 1W1P and using our hydrology, stream geomorphology, and connectivity information and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of actual, planned, or proposed on-the-ground water quality or water management projects, including many identified as priorities in approved CWMPs. Our past assistance to local partners in evaluating, designing and implementing culvert/bridge replacements using the geomorphic approach has spawned a new grant program which will fund this work in the FY24-25 biennium. Protecting lakes, shoreland and floodplains: Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related datasets and continue to help watershed partners use the information to prioritize lakes for protection. Continue helping local partners develop and apply higher standards for water quality in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase, adding pages related to climate change and vanishing shorelines. Collaborate with local partners to provide forest stewardship plans, cost share and technical assistance to private forest landowners to help protect or restore water quality in priority lakes identified by local partners in CWMPs in northern Minnesota. Fish contamination: Continue providing technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Watershed science outreach: Continue outreach on the topics above to help stakeholders and practitioners understand root causes of water quality problems and use scientific data and information to apply multiple-benefit solutions. ","Watershed planning: Field staff contributed information and reviewed drafts for at least 20 1W1P plan development or amendment efforts. Site-scale technical assistance: Field staff used their hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity data, analyses and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, or monitor over 120 actual, planned or proposed projects in 45 major watersheds, 49% of which we assisted for the first time this year (the work may span years as projects go from conceptual to built). Nearly 95% involve restoring stream channels or stabilizing banks and almost 60% involve stream crossings. About 65% are beyond the idea stage. Worked with local partners to write forest stewardship plans for two landowners, providing cost-share and technical assistance on 103 acres to protect water quality in priority areas in the Root and Cannon River watersheds.  Information resources: Specialists updated the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index, lake hydrology datasets with lake health scores, and cost-benefit data (now in WHAF for Lakes). Helped 1W1P partners and others use the data to prioritize lakes for protection. Further developed and helped local partners use higher water quality standards in shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Helped launch a Natural Shorelines Partnership. Created a Climate Trends Affecting Shorelands webpage and guidance to help LGUs and citizens protect natural shorelines. Provided fish contamination assessment technical guidance on sampling protocols, mercury in fish tissue trend analysis, and PFAS monitoring and analysis. Crafted alternative methods to assess impairment for mercury in fish tissue. Watershed science outreach: Field staff delivered 14 presentations and conducted two field tours and two trainings, reaching over 615 LGU staff, other environmental professionals, teachers, students and other stakeholders throughout Minnesota.   ",,,,1077276,182058,,8.2,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2023,1250000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","Watershed planning:Serve on advisory committees for around 25 One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects to develop or update Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CWMPs). Continue to contribute relevant data and information and to review draft and final plans. Implementation technical assistance: Continue building on our participation in 1W1P and using our hydrology, stream geomorphology, and connectivity information and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of actual, planned, or proposed on-the-ground water quality or water management projects, including many identified as priorities in approved CWMPs. Continue to evaluate and help partners implement culvert and bridge replacements using the geomorphic approach to connect stream channels to floodplains, improve safety and resilience, and reduce maintenance needs, while also improving stream stability and ecological functions. (Specially designed floodplain culverts distribute channel-overtopping flow in floodplains instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge.) Protecting lakes, shoreland and floodplains: Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related datasets and continue to help watershed partners use this information to prioritize lakes for protection. Continue helping local partners develop and apply higher standards for water quality in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Fish contamination: Continue providing technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Watershed science outreach: Continue outreach on the topics above to help stakeholders and practitioners understand root causes of water quality problems and use scientific data and information to apply multiple-benefit solutions. "," Watershed planning: Served on advisory committees for 25 1W1P plan development efforts, contributing data and information and reviewing draft and final plans. Implementation technical assistance: Used our hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity data, analyses and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement and/or monitor the effectiveness of more than 95 actual, planned or proposed water cleanup/management projects in 37 major watersheds, 35 of which we assisted for the first time this year. (Our assistance often spans a few years as projects progress from conceptual to on-the-ground.) Nearly 55% of the projects we assisted this year involve restoring stream channels and/or stabilizing streambanks and nearly 40% involve stream crossings, including at least 6 using the geomorphic approach for planned culvert/bridge replacements. Protecting lakes, shoreland and floodplains: Updated the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index, lake hydrology dataset and cost-benefit data with new water quality data and helped local partners use these data to prioritize lakes for protection. Helped develop and launch a new interactive lake information tool in DNR’s Watershed Health Assessment Framework. Helped local partners use higher water quality standards in shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase, to which we added pages on riprap and retaining walls. Fish contamination: Provided technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Helped develop fish sampling protocols, mercury in fish tissue trend analysis, and PFAS monitoring and analysis. Watershed science outreach: Reached nearly 1000 local, state and federal government staff at local, regional and statewide events; 125 professionals at a national conference; and many TV viewers and local radio listeners.   ",,,,1013806,180271,,7.9,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2022,1250000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(f)","$1250000 the first year and $1250000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. "," Continue using DNR hydrology, stream geomorphology and connectivity information and expertise (see Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies) and building on our participation in One Watershed One Plan projects (see below) to help local government units (LGUs) and other partners identify, develop, propose, target, design implement and/or monitor the effectiveness of on-the-ground water quality or water management projects – including many identified as priorities in Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans (CNMPs). Participate in advisory committees for 28 1W1P projects and contribute information to aid CNMP development. Participate in one or more CNMP plan review and update efforts. Continue evaluating sites for specially designed floodplain culverts at road/river crossings and quantifying their environmental benefits. (Floodplain culverts allow runoff to flow naturally during a flood distributing high flows and energy across a stream’s floodplain instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge.) Continue promoting the approach; planning for potential accelerated future implementation to make transportation infrastructure more resilient to climate change; and quantifying the effects on floodplain and channel connectivity at the watershed scale, where projects are being implemented. Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index with new water quality data from MPCA. Continue education and outreach on prioritizing lakes for protection to targeted audiences. Provide technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Continue outreach to help water managers and other stakeholders understand specific aspects of watershed science, including the root causes of water quality problems and multiple-benefit ways to address them. ","Watershed planning: Served on advisory committees for 26 1W1P plan development efforts, contributing relevant data and information and reviewing draft and final plans. Implementation project assistance: Used our hydrology, geomorphology, and connectivity data, analyses, and expertise to help local partners identify, develop, propose, target, design, implement, and/or monitor the effectiveness of more than 80 actual, planned, or proposed water cleanup or management projects in 33 major watersheds. Our technical assistance often spans several years as projects progress from conceptual to on-the-ground; this year we assisted at least 30 projects for the first time. More than 55 of the projects we assisted this year involve restoring stream channels and/or stabilizing streambanks and more than 20 involve stream crossings, including 9 using the DNR’s geomorphic approach to evaluate culvert/bridge replacements. More than 35 of the projects we assisted this year were identified as priorities in local water plans. Lake, shoreland and floodplain protection: Updated the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and cost-benefit data with new MPCA water quality data. Added Lake Health Scores to an existing lake hydrology dataset. Continued helping local partners use these data to prioritize lakes for protection. Further developed and helped local partners use higher standards for water quality in their shoreland and floodplain ordinances, via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Fish contamination: Provided technical guidance to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Watershed science outreach: In presentations on the above topics, reached 75 high school students, at least 160 local watershed management planning partnership or stakeholder groups in several Minnesota watersheds, and more than 475 practitioners from Minnesota and other states. ",,,,901868,148250,,7.5,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2021,1000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. "," Continue using DNR hydrology stream geomorphology and connectivity information and expertise (see Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies) to help local government units (LGUs) and other partners identify develop propose target design and/or implement on-the-ground water quality projects. Participate in all active One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) advisory committees (for an estimated 25 plan development projects) by providing information to aid plan development and reviewing draft plans. Participate in plan mid-term review and update efforts for up to five existing plans. Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index with new water quality data from MPCA; Update the Lakes of Biological Significance dataset. Continue outreach on prioritizing lakes for protection to targeted audiences. Continue outreach on higher water quality standards in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances via training and the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase. Continue evaluating potential sites for specially designed 'floodplain culverts' at road/river crossings and quantifying their environmental benefits. Floodplain culverts allow runoff to flow naturally during a flood distributing high flows and energy across a stream's floodplain instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge. Continue educational and outreach efforts to help water managers' and other stakeholders' understand specific aspects of watershed science including root causes of water quality problems and the potential to address them in ways that provide multiple benefits. "," Used our hydrology and geomorphology and connectivity data to help local partners identify develop propose target design implement and/or monitor the effectiveness of more than 95 on-the-ground water quality or water management projects in 39 major watersheds. Most relate to stabilizing stream banks and/or restoring stream channels; others involve removing or modifying dams improving lake shorelines or outlets designing ecologically resilient 'floodplain culverts' at problematic road-river crossings and more. Project development planning and implementation can take years. Many of the projects assisted this year were identified by LGUs as priorities in watershed management plans. Participated in advisory committees for 26 1W1P planning projects involving contributing information for plan development and draft plan review and comments. Participated in one plan mid-term review/update. Provided technical guidance and statistical analyses to the interagency fish contaminant monitoring program. Improved data used to help prioritize lakes for protection: Updated lake water quality data in the DNR Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and related cost-benefit data. Developed new lake hydrology metrics available at https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/env-lake-hydrology. Reached over 200 state and local government staff in presentations related to prioritizing lakes for protection. Reached hundreds of Minnesota professionals and stakeholders in presentations on stream restorations projects featured in a multi-state symposium a DNR Roundtable video and a Clean Water Council field tour. Provided culvert design and inventory training to over 100 state and local government staff. Reached at least 125 participants in five 1W1P projects with presentations about DNR Evaluation of Hydrologic Change (EHC) findings. Completed two watershed posters that reached at least 80 1W1P participants and completed or worked on similar fact sheets or posters for four other watersh ",,,,952288,132765,,8.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2020,1000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","Technical assistance with implementation projects: Continue applying our hydrology stream geomorphology and connectivity information and expertise (see Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies) to help local government units (LGUs) identify develop propose target design and/or implement on-the-ground water quality projects.   Conservation planning: Participate in 24 One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) planning projects by contributing information serving on 1W1P advisory committees and reviewing draft plans. Continue training 1W1P consultants in using the Zonation conservation planning tool to help local 1W1P partnerships identify watershed management priorities. Update the Lake Phosphorus Sensitivity Index with new water quality data from MPCA. Continue outreach on prioritizing lakes for protection to targeted audiences. Update the Lakes of Biological Significance dataset. Continue outreach on higher water quality standards in local shoreland and floodplain ordinances via training and new content on the Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase webpage. Continue evaluating potential sites for specially designed “floodplain culverts” at road/river crossings and quantifying their environmental benefits. Floodplain culverts allow runoff to flow naturally during a flood distributing high flows and energy across a stream’s floodplain instead of confining it to a main culvert or bridge. This alternative to traditional culverts has great potential to improve watershed health and resiliency. Increase our outreach efforts including a paper accepted at the Transportation Resilience International 2019 Conference in Washington D.C.   Other outreach and education: Continue educational and outreach efforts to help water managers’ and other stakeholders’ understand specific aspects of watershed science including root causes of water quality problems and the potential to address them in ways that provide multiple benefits. ","Used our hydrology geomorphology and connectivity data to help local partners identify develop propose target design and/or implement at least 75 on-the-ground water quality projects in 33 major watersheds. Most involve stream channel restoration or stream bank stabilization. Identified and helped implement design or advance floodplain culverts as a solution at road/river crossings in at least 7 watersheds and presented the approach at a national conference on climate change and transportation infrastructure resilience. Worked with consulting foresters Soil & Water Conservation Districts the Board of Water & Soil Resources and others to complete landscape stewardship plans with forestry recommendations for five major watersheds that supply drinking water to St Cloud and the Twin Cities and have completed or approved local watershed management plans. DNR collaborated with partners in these watersheds to write 223 stewardship plans covering 32 088 acres of private forestland and worked with landowners to protect 21 262 acres of working forestland via the Sustainable Forestry Incentives Act—mostly in subwatersheds considered high-priority for water quality. Participated in 21 One Watershed One Plan advisory committees providing information to aid plan development and reviewing draft plans. Updated the Lakes of Biological Significance dataset lake water quality data in the DNR Phosphorus Sensitivity Index and cost-benefit data that MPCA and LGUs use to prioritize lakes for protection. Reached over 200 state and local government professionals in related presentations. Presented on enhanced water quality protection in local ordinances to about 175 professionals throughout the state. Reached over 250 local decision-makers natural resource managers and others in at least ten other watershed science presentations in nine watersheds. Reached 20 higher education students and others in geomorphic and culvert inventory training events. ",,,,1019070,146921,,8.7,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2019,950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$950000 the first year and $950000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","Technical assistance: In FY19 DNR regional staff will continue helping local governments identify prioritize develop target design and implement clean water restoration and protection projects designed to provide enduring water quality and other environmental and economic benefits. Conservation planning: In FY19 DNR field staff will contribute to 22 local watershed planning (One Watershed One Plan) projects by communicating DNR priorities participating in advisory committee meetings and reviewing plan or chapter drafts. We will help local partners prioritize lakes for investment and set measurable protection and restoration goals using water quality phosphorus sensitivity and benefit-cost data. The DNR Land Use Unit will create a webpage showcasing local examples of high shoreland management standards and continue “floodplain culvert” outreach and technical assistance as well as sediment analysis and advanced modeling of this alternative practice to determine effectiveness at the watershed scale. Forest stewardship: In FY19 the DNR will continue to provide forest stewardship plans to landowners in targeted watersheds. We will also complete three to five landscape-level stewardship plans in association with local watershed management planning (One Watershed One Plan) in headwaters of the Redeye River and Rum River watersheds. The landscape-level plans will help local governments incorporate forestry recommendations into comprehensive watershed management plans. Outreach & education: In FY19 DNR staff will continue educational and outreach efforts to help water managers’ and other stakeholders’ understand specific aspects of watershed science including root causes of water quality problems and the potential to address them in ways that provide multiple benefits. ","Technical assistance with implementation projects: Used our hydrology, geomorphology and connectivity information to help local governments (LGUs) identify, develop, propose, target, design and/or implement over 80 water quality projects in 39 major watersheds. Most involve stream restoration or dam removals. Conservation planning assistance:                                  • Participated in 22 One Watershed One Plan projects. Provided information, served on advisory committees and reviewed draft plans. • Refined the lake phosphorus sensitivity index that MPCA and LGUs use to prioritize lakes for protection. Reached over 300 lake association and LGU professionals at workshops, trainings and presentations on this topic, including cost-benefit analysis. • Created an Innovative Shoreland Standards Showcase webpage to highlight examples of enhanced water quality protection in local ordinances and presented it to 120 LGU staff. Worked with LGUs in 8 watersheds to incorporate higher water quality standards in local ordinances or land use plans. • Continued to evaluate potential sites for “floodplain culverts” at road/river crossings and quantify their environmental benefits. These specially designed culverts can improve watershed health and resiliency. Forest stewardship: Worked with landowners, Soil & Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 44 stewardship plans covering 6,842 acres of privately owned forestland in targeted subwatersheds of the Pine and Leech Lake major watersheds. Continued working with partners to develop landscape-level forest stewardship plans for selected watersheds. Other outreach and education: Reached over 1,000 local decision-makers, natural resource managers, youth and others in 32 presentations and trainings about watershed science in 24 watersheds. Organized a River Restoration conference that drew over 200 natural resource professionals. ",,,,848977,106081,,7.9,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2018,950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$950000 the first year and $950000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities.","Technical assistance to local implementation efforts: In FY18 DNR regional staff will continue helping local governments identify prioritize develop target design and implement clean water projects leading to more enduring water quality and other environmental benefits. Conservation planning assistance: DNR regional staff will participate in each of the 14 One watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects that will be active in FY18. This work will include actively participating in 1W1P advisory committee meetings providing DNR priorities to local governments and reviewing drafts of key sections of each plan under way. Where invited DNR staff will also continue using the Zonation conservation planning model to help communities identify water quality and water management priorities as part of 1W1P projects or community engagement in the development of watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS). Forest Stewardship Plans: In FY18 the DNR will continue to provide forest stewardship plans to landowners in targeted watersheds. Work will shift into the Pine River Watershed to leverage a grant from the U.S. Forest Service. Outreach & education: In FY18 DNR staff will continue educational and outreach efforts to enhance water managers’ and stakeholders’ understanding of watershed health the root causes of water quality problems and solutions that provide multiple benefits.","Technical assistance: In FY18 DNR helped local governments in 34 watersheds identify develop target design and/or implement water quality projects designed to provide enduring water quality and other environmental and economic benefits. Conservation planning: In FY18 DNR contributed to all 14 local comprehensive watershed management planning (One Watershed One Plan) projects that were active in FY18 by communicating DNR priorities serving on advisory committees and reviewing draft plans. In five projects we helped communities identify conservation priorities using the Zonation model – in the process helping partners see how to replicate the approach for potential use in other projects. We provided early input on 20 other local water planning efforts and 23 local land use planning efforts involving at least 16 watersheds. Six cities/counties used our updated shoreland model ordinance to adopt or amend shoreland ordinances with higher standards to better protect water quality. We took key steps to help permit applicants learn about environmentally beneficial “floodplain culverts” and continued advanced modeling to evaluate this optional practice. Forest stewardship: In FY18 DNR worked with landowners Soil & Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 14 forest stewardship plans covering 3 604 acres of private forestland in targeted watersheds as well as two landscape-level stewardship plans for Pine and Leech Lake River subwatersheds leveraging federal funds and other state funds to work with private landowners on forest stewardship. Outreach & education: In FY18 DNR delivered over 65 presentations on watershed science topics to more than 1 575 water managers land use planners engineers and others at local venues in at least 20 watersheds as well as larger regional and statewide venues.",,,,829695,104624,,7.4,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2017,1000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","(f) $1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities.","Technical assistance to local implementation efforts: DNR staff will continue helping local government units (LGUs) identify prioritize develop target design and implement clean water projects leading to more enduring water quality and other environmental benefits. Conservation planning assistance: We will join advisory committees for 7 new One watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects and comment on draft and final plans developed by LGUs in 5 1W1P pilot projects. We will continue using the Zonation conservation planning model to help communities identify water quality and water management priorities where invited by the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) or LGUs engaged in 1W1P or watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) efforts. Connecting water quality and land use: In two Upper Mississippi River Basin watersheds we will pilot tools to help LGUs and the MPCA incorporate local land use ordinance information and strategies in WRAPS reports and begin refining these tools for use in other watersheds. We will develop a webpage with ideas for updating local ordinances to include beyond-minimum standards for protecting water quality. We will complete and disseminate a fact sheet for permit applicants about designing culverts that protect floodplains. Forest Stewardship Plans: We will continue working with landowners Soil and Water Conservation Districts (SWCDs) and consultant foresters to write up to 30 stewardship plans covering an estimated 30 000 acres of forested land in targeted watersheds. This work may expand into the Pine and Kettle River watersheds. Outreach & education: We will continue educational and outreach efforts to enhance water managers’ and stakeholders’ understanding of aspects of watershed health. This will include presentations at small venues throughout the state as well as large statewide conferences.","Technical assistance to local implementation projects: In FY17 staff assisted local governments with more than 85 water quality projects in 28 watersheds. We helped target 35 projects in 18 major watersheds. This work leads to more lasting water quality results and other environmental outcomes. Conservation planning assistance: We provided early input on 39 local water planning efforts and 11 local land use planning efforts involving 37 watersheds. We participated in all 12 of the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) projects active that year; we reviewed plans for 4 of the 5 pilot projects provided input on the remaining pilot and communicated priorities to 7 new projects. In 5 watersheds where invited we led communities in identifying priorities using the Zonation conservation planning model. We updated the DNR Shoreland Model Ordinance with options that provide better water quality protection and disseminated this information to planners. Several counties are now exploring ordinance updates using the model. In 2 watersheds staff began testing a shoreland protection analysis tool to help identify opportunities to strengthen existing ordinances. We finalized and disseminated a package of information on “floodplain culverts ” an approach to infrastructure design at road-river crossings that takes stream stability and floodplain connectivity into account. Outreach & education: We gave about 30 presentations to over 800 water managers land use planners engineers and others. Venues ranged from local and regional meetings to large statewide conferences. Forest Stewardship Plans: Wed worked with landowners Soil and Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 43 forest stewardship plans covering 4 287 acres in targeted watersheds with lakes that are home to tullibee an important prey fish that requires cold clean water. We also targeted plans and project work to forested watersheds in parts of southeastern Minnesota.",,,,742515,100753,,6.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2016,1000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","(f) $1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities.","In FY16 DNR staff will continue to work with local governments to identify priority areas for targeting actions to protect and improve water quality including continuation/completion of the five One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) pilot projects. We will continue to use and adapt the Zonation model and associated surveys to create conservation priority maps for the following watersheds: Mississippi River-Headwaters and Cannon Rivers. DNR foresters will work with Soil and Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write stewardship plans for forested land in targeted watersheds including an expansion of tullibee lakes from new counties and more work on the Healthy Forests for Healthy Water project in southeast Minnesota.","Technical assistance to local implementation efforts: DNR staff assisted local governments (LGUs) with water quality projects in 49 watersheds. We helped design over 80 projects; identify prioritize or find funding or partners for potential projects in over 25 watersheds; target effective sites for over 35 projects; and improve water quality protection measures in local ordinances in 8 watersheds. This work leads to more enduring water quality and other environmental outcomes. Conservation planning assistance: We advised 5 One Watershed One Plan pilot projects supplying often substantial technical data on request. We led communities in using the Zonation conservation planning model to identify priorities in 3 watersheds where invited by LGUs or the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). Connecting water quality and land use: We started developing several new products: Tools to help LGUs and the MPCA add local land use ordinance information and strategies to watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) reports; an inventory of local ordinances with beyond-minimum standards that protect water quality; a model ordinance that includes some of these higher standards; and a fact sheet for permit applicants about designing culverts that protect floodplains. Forest Stewardship Plans: We worked with landowners Soil and Water Conservation Districts and consultant foresters to write 42 forest stewardship plans covering 3 743 acres in targeted watersheds with lakes that are home to tullibee—an important prey fish that needs cold clean water to survive. We also targeted plans to forested watersheds in parts of southeastern MN to improve water quality in streams and rivers. Outreach & education: We reached well over 800 water managers and stakeholders in educational presentations posters and newsletter articles on watershed health topics. Audiences at 35 or so presentations ranged from small groups in over 12 watersheds to large statewide conferences.",,,,674676,99317,,6.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2015,1000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities including water quality protection in forested watersheds. ","In FY15 staff will continue to help local governments identify target and design implementation projects to protect and restore water quality. Staff will also participate in One Watershed One Plan interagency core teams for pilot watershed projects. The 4-step zonation framework will be applied and adapted in additional watersheds including the Mississippi River –Winona Leech Lake River Middle Minnesota River and St. Louis River. We will also apply the framework in the Lake Superior- North watershed at the invitation of the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources as part of the One Watershed One Plan pilot projects in those watersheds. Staff will also continue to enhance local capacity by building understanding of watershed systems through presentations and workshops. DNR foresters will work with Soil and Water Conservation Districts and additional landowners to write stewardship plans for forested land in targeted watersheds.","In FY15 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. We participated in five One Watershed One Plan pilot programs (Red Lake River Root River Lake Superior North North Fork Crow River Yellow Medicine River and Root River. In each watershed one lead staff person (supported by the Clean Water Fund) served as the DNR’s main contact on the locally-led technical advisory team so that our agency’s participation was streamlined efficient and effective. We worked with local governments to help develop 58 project ideas that will provide water quality and other ecosystem benefits. We provided technical assistance with funding design or implementation on 79 specific water quality projects in 30 watersheds. The result is water quality projects that are selected located and designed for long-term sustainability. We also developed new model ordinances with higher standards for water quality and worked on approaches to identify priorities for protection of lakes and rivers. As part of this work with communities we gave 36 different presentations for local communities or groups to build their understanding of watersheds. In total 1175 people attended these presentations and workshops. DNR staff worked with local governments to identify priority areas for targeting actions to protect and improve water quality. We used Zonation a value-based model with surveys and a mapping exercise to produce priority maps for 5 watersheds. DNR foresters worked with landowners soil and water conservation districts (SWCDs) and consultant foresters to write 23 forest stewardship plans covering 3 058 acres in targeted watersheds of lakes that are home to tullibee an important prey fish that requires cold clean water to survive. We are also doing targeted forest stewardship in southeast Minnesota to improve water quality in streams and rivers. ",,,,915714,94779,,6.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2014,1000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(f)","$1000000 the first year and $1000000 the second year are for technical assistance to support local implementation of nonpoint source restoration and protection activities including water quality protection in forested watersheds. ","In FY14 DNR staff will continue to work with state agency partners and assist local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY13. ","In FY14 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection efforts enhancing locally led projects through expertise in hydrology geomorphology and biology. Field staff helped strategically target conservation for 68 project ideas that will yield water quality and other ecosystem benefits and provided technical assistance on funding design or implementation for 84 projects. The result is water quality projects selected sited and designed for long-term sustainability. For example DNR consulted with several local governments about a natural-channel approach to stream channel stabilization which lasts longer and enhances habitat more than traditional armoring of stream banks. Field staff also worked with 44 communities or groups to build understanding of watersheds and enhance capacity to address water quality challenges through presentations and workshops attended by over 1 120 people. Foresters worked with landowners and SWCDs to write 92 forest stewardship plans covering 10 141 acres in targeted watersheds – a dramatic increase in the number of plans in these watersheds which drain to sensitive lakes home to tullibee an important prey fish that requires cold clean water to survive. Forest stewardship plans increase landowners’ eligibility for land protection programs and improve forest health which is integral to protecting high quality lakes. Staff helped local governments identify priority areas for targeting actions to protect and improve water quality using a framework that includes Zonation a value-based model; surveys of hundreds of people to determine how much they value specific conservation features; and a peer-review mapping exercise to synthesize personal knowledge about water quality risks and vulnerabilities in specific locations. Priority area maps were produced for the Chippewa River Mississippi River-St. Cloud and Yellow Medicine River watersheds. ",,,,734146,69391,,6.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2013,1220000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY13 DNR staff will continue to work with state agency partners and assist local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. Field staff will promote strategies that benefit clean water as well as habitat and other ecosystem values through education technical help and partnership. This work will use natural resource information and conservation targeting tools to maximize conservation investments by matching the right strategies in the right places. DNR will be a partner in building local capacity so that local governments are supported in: better understanding watershed systems; incorporating watershed information and analysis into local water and watershed plans; and targeting designing funding and implementing clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR foresters and Soil and Water Conservation Districts will work with landowners in watersheds of sensitive lakes in 7 counties to: write 50 forest stewardship plans totaling 7 000 acres; and distribute $45 000 in cost share funding for private forest management activities. The result will be an increase in land eligible for enrollment in land protection programs and an increase in forest health which is integral to protecting high quality lakes.","In FY13 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. DNR brings expertise in hydrology geomorphology and biology that enhances local projects so that conservation investments give maximum water quality and ecosystem benefits. Field staff worked with local governments to strategically target conservation for 58 project ideas that will provide water quality and other ecosystem benefits and they provided technical assistance with funding design or implementation on 127 specific water quality projects. The result is water quality projects that are selected located and designed for long-term sustainability. For example DNR consulted with a number of local governments to use a natural channel design approach to stream channel stabilization projects; this type of project lasts longer and provides better habitat benefits than traditional armoring of stream banks. Field staff also worked with 32 communities or groups to build their understanding of watersheds and enhance their capacity through presentations and workshops that were attended by a total of over 1 150 people. DNR foresters worked with landowners and County Soil and Water Conservation Districts to write 59 forest stewardship plans covering 6 458 acres of forested land in targeted watersheds. This represents an 80% increase in the number of stewardship plans in the targeted watersheds which drain to sensitive lakes that are home to populations of tulibee an important fish that requires cold clean water to survive. The forest stewardship plans will increase eligibility for enrollment in land protection programs and result in an increase in forest health which is integral to protecting high quality lakes.",,,,570678,69821,,5.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2012,1220000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY 12 DNR will provide assistance to local governments shoreland and woodland owners on clean water restoration and protection issues. DNR will expand the number of people working to promote strategies that benefit clean water as well as habitat and other ecosystem values through education technical help and partnership. This work will use natural resource information and conservation targeting tools to maximize conservation investments by matching the right strategies in the right places. DNR will help local governments design get funding and implement clean water strategies. DNR Foresters will work with property owners in priority areas within the central lakes region to write stewardship plans and promote enrollment in land protection programs.","In FY12 DNR staff worked with state agency partners and assisted local governments on clean water restoration and protection issues. DNR brings expertise in hydrology geomorphology and biology that enhances local projects so that conservation investments give maximum water quality and ecosystem benefits. Field staff worked with 18 local governments on strategically targeting conservation work for water quality and other ecosystem benefits and provided technical assistance with funding design or implementation on 48 individual water quality projects. The result is water quality projects that are selected located and designed for long-term sustainability. For example DNR consulted with a number of local governments to use a natural channel design approach to stream channel stabilization projects this type of project lasts longer and provides better habitat benefits than traditional armoring of stream banks. Field staff also worked with 24 communities or groups to build their understanding of watersheds and enhance their capacity through presentations and workshops that were attended by a total of over 850 people.",,,,276675,176489,,9.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2011,250000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","In FY11 DNR hydrologists will continue the workshops and implementation projects started in the south and east parts of the state in FY10. Fisheries staff in southwestern Minnesota will partner with the Blue Earth Soil and Water Conservation District and to promote aquatic habitat conservation practices with local landowners. DNR will also adapt the CD-Rom ""Restore Your Shore"" into a new interactive website to make this useful information accessible to a broader audience.","In FY11 hydrologists and fisheries staff worked with local governments and property owners on clean water restoration and protection issues in the south and east parts of the state: *Presented clean water strategies information at 9 workshops tours and other events including 6 ""Our Water Our Choices"" workshops led by DNR and attended by 93 people including local officials. *Participated in St. Croix MIDS (Minimal Impact Design Standards) pilot steering committee. This project will help cities establish policies and programs that will give them a path to compliance with and a method for calculating credits for certain state stormwater requirements. *Assisted with funding coordination design or installation of 10 restoration projects including 4 river restoration projects 2 raingardens one wetland restoration two native prairies and a high velocity fish barrier. *Adapted the CD-Rom ""Restore Your Shore"" to an internet-based application that allows users to interactively explore ways that shoreline property owners can create enhance or protect healthy shorelines for habitat and clean water. The website includes step by step instructions for shoreland restoration and an online interactive plant selection tool. * Worked with local governments to provide information guidance and technical assistance to landowners regarding conservation assistance easements and conservation projects. This work resulted in permanently protecting 348.8 acres of riparian land and floodplains through conservation easements. ",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 3612,"Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection (formerly ""Shoreland Stewardship"")",2010,250000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$250000 the first year and $250000 the second year are for nonpoint source restoration and protection activities. ","In FY10 DNR will provide assistance to local governments and shoreland owners on clean water restoration and protection issues. This work will be done primarily in two areas of the state. In the south DNR a hydrologist will lead the development and presentation of a workshop series ""Our Water Our Choices"" for citizens and local officials and work with local groups on clean water projects. In the St. Croix Basin a hydrologist will work partners and local communities to promote and implemement best management practices for clean water.","In FY10 DNR hydrologists provided assistance to local governments and shoreland owners on clean water restoration and protection issues: * Presented clean water strategies information at 22 workshops tours and other events including 10 ""Our Water Our Choices"" workshops led by DNR and attended by 257 people including local officials. * Worked with partners to design and install 3 raingardens to capture runoff and prevent downstream pollution. *Provided technical assistance and input to local partners on clean water strategies including agricultural best management practices and municipal stormwater infrastructure. * Worked with Crow Organization of Waters on two river restorations near Forest City and Hutchinson. * Coordinated and executed the High Island Lake drawdown in Sibley County with a collaborative of lake association local and federal partners. * Restored two lakeshore lots on Lake Jennie as part of a hands-on shoreline restoration workshop. * Developed and distributed informational materials about shorelines raingardens and agricultural best management practices.",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with local partners to provide technical assistance on implementation projects and related outreach, resulting in cleaner water through healthier watersheds, shorelands and floodplains. We help partners identify, develop, target, design and/or implement on-the-ground projects that improve water quality, enhance habitat and protect infrastructure. We help design restorations that provide lasting benefits by mimicking features of healthy ecosystems. Land use experts work with communities interested in strengthening local policies that help protect sensitive areas like shorelands and floodplains. ","Healthy watersheds (the area of land that drains to the water body) and healthy shorelands and floodplains (areas where the land meets the water) are critical for clean water in streams and lakes. The shoreland is home to the majority of plants and animals in the lake ecosystem. Trees, shrubs, and deep-rooted native grasses and wildflowers prevent shoreline erosion and trap sediment, excess phosphorus and other pollution, preventing it from entering lakes. Healthy floodplains and streams restored using natural channel design principles help manage increased stream flows, reduce sediment-related pollution and protect aquatic and riparian habitat. However, many of our shoreland and floodplain ecosystems are severely degraded or vulnerable to erosion and damage. We use information from our studies of stream flow, stream stability, streambank erosion, lake levels, and lake biology to work with local partners on enduring solutions that address the root causes of water quality issues, restore or protect habitat and increase the resiliency of land and infrastructure near water (especially at road/river crossings). ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Preservation, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nonpoint-source-restoration-and-protection-formerly-shoreland-stewardship,,,, 37643,"North Fork Crow Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Cycle 2 - Phase 1",2017,50000,2017,,,,,,,,,,0.46,"Middle Fork Crow River Watershed Dist","Local/Regional Government","This contract will be to initiate the second cycle of the North Fork Crow River Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) development. The project will provide needed information and analysis to make sure that implementation strategies are well thought out and targeted. The result will be a framework for civic and citizen engagement and communication, which will contribute to long-term public participation in surface water protection and restoration activities throughout the watershed. ",,"North Fork Crow River Watershed ",2017-04-10,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Margaret,Johnson,"Middle Fork Crow River Watershed District","PO Box 8",Spicer,MN,56288,"(320) 796-0888",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Kandiyohi, McLeod, Meeker, Pope, Stearns, Wright",,"North Fork Crow River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/north-fork-crow-watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategy-wraps-cycle-2-phase-1,,,, 37678,"Nutrient Calibration: Minnesota River Basin 2017",2017,109928,,,,,,,,,,,0.41,"Tetra Tech Inc","For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to refine the nutrient and algae simulation in the Minnesota River basin using all relevant available sources of information. The outcome of this work order is a revised Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) watershed model application for the Minnesota River basin that correctly represents nutrient sources and algae. The contractor will provide a fully functioning, executable model that will simulate improved hydrology, sediment (sand, silt, and clay), temperature, phosphorus, nitrogen, dissolved oxygen, biochemical oxygen demand, and chlorophyll at the 12-digit HUC subbasin scale (or finer) as developed in the existing 2016 Minnesota River Basin models. ",,"Blue Earth River Watershed Chippewa River Watershed Cottonwood River Watershed Lac qui Parle River Watershed Le Sueur River Watershed Lower Minnesota River Watershed Minnesota River - Headwaters Watershed Minnesota River - Mankato Watershed Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River Watershed Pomme de Terre River Watershed Redwood River Watershed   ",2017-05-11,2019-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Big Stone, Blue Earth, Brown, Carver, Chippewa, Cottonwood, Dakota, Douglas, Faribault, Freeborn, Grant, Hennepin, Kandiyohi, Lac qui Parle, Le Sueur, Lincoln, Lyon, Martin, McLeod, Murray, Nicollet, Otter Tail, Pipestone, Pope, Redwood, Renville, Rice, Scott, Sibley, Stevens, Swift, Traverse, Waseca, Watonwan, Yellow Medicine",,"Blue Earth River, Chippewa River, Cottonwood River, Lac qui Parle River, Le Sueur River, Lower Minnesota River , Minnesota River - Headwaters, Minnesota River - Mankato, Minnesota River - Yellow Medicine River, Pomme de Terre River, Redwood River, Watonwan River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/nutrient-calibration-minnesota-river-basin-2017,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2025,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2024,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments ","The results for FY24 are currently under review and analysis. The final report will be available in June 2025. ",,,,318465,46459,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2023,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2025. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 820 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,580 Total number of pesticide analytes - 186 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 49 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 70 Total pesticide analyses completed - 122,239 Total number of pesticide detections - 5,897 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (84) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (94) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1), and Chlorpyrifos (10) ",,,,296745,45473,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2022,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2021: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2025. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 851 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,623 Total number of pesticide analytes - 185 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 49 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 77 Total pesticide analyses completed - 122,293 Total number of pesticide detections - 6,828 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor (84) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (93) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chlorpyrifos (13) ",,,,298907,44221,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2021,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events  - 714 Number of pesticide samples collected  -  1,379 Total number of pesticide analytes  -  181 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater  -  42 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water  -  73 Total pesticide analyses completed  -  100,465 Total number of pesticide detections  -  4,365 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater  - Metolachlor ESA Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water  -  Hydoxyatrazine Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments  - Acetochlor (1), Chlorpyrifos (13)   ",,,,301456,48553,,2.29,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2020,350000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2019, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 838 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,586 Total number of pesticide analytes - 178 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 45 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 73 Total pesticide analyses completed - 121,384 Total number of pesticide detections - 7,274 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (87) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (95) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chlorpyrifos (13) ",,,,306828,46024,,2.41,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2019,350000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M. L. 2017: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 972 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,909 Total number of pesticide analytes - 166 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 47 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 69 Total pesticide analyses completed - 119,963 Total number of pesticide detections - 7,605 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (82) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (97) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chrlopyrifos (13) ",,,,315168,39428,,2.54,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2018,350000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events Number of pesticide samples collected Total number of pesticide analytes Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water Total pesticide analyses completed Total number of pesticide detections Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments "," Total pesticide monitoring sample events - 957 Number of pesticide samples collected - 1,819 Total number of pesticide analytes - 155 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in groundwater - 40 Total number of detected pesticide analytes in surface water - 66 Total pesticide analyses completed - 103,375 Total number of pesticide detections - 6,188 Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in groundwater - Metolachlor ESA (81) Most frequently detected pesticide analyte in surface water - Hydroxyatrazine (93) Active pesticide surface waterbody impairments - Acetochlor (1) and Chlorpyrifos (9) ",,,,336196,47437,,2.25,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2017,350000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Number of target analytes considered per year Number of target analytes detected per year Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and effectiveness of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Fund Performance Report in February 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of the report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures. MDA's water quality monitoring program is reporting on performance measure EDWOM2: Changes over time in key water quality parameters for lakes, streams and wetlands and EDWOM3: Changes over time in pesticides, nitrate and other key water quality parameters in groundwater. ",,,,,290772,43936,,2.25,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2016,350000,"M.L. 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and effectiveness of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Fund Performance Report in February 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of the report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures. MDA's water quality monitoring program is reporting on performance measure EDWOM2: Changes over time in key water quality parameters for lakes, streams and wetlands and EDWOM3: Changes over time in pesticides, nitrate and other key water quality parameters in groundwater. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year (143) • Number of target analytes detected per year (108) Groundwater detections: 39 Surfacewater detections: 69  ",,,"The MDA's Pesticide Monitoring Program is supported by the MDA's Pesticide Regulatory Account, Fertilizer Regulatory Account, General Funds and a federal grant. ",330496,52185,,2.25,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2015,350000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ",,"Number of target analytes considered per year (138) • Number of target analytes detected per year (98) Groundwater detections: 36 Surfacewater detections: 62  ",,,"The MDA's Pesticide Monitoring Program is supported by the MDA's Pesticide Regulatory Account, Fertilizer Regulatory Account, General Funds and a federal grant. ",306047,45417,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2014,350000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 3","(a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ",,"• Number of target analytes considered per year (135) • Number of target analytes detected per year (96) Groundwater detections: 37 Surfacewater detections: 59  ",,,,277096,40927,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2013,350000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year Minnesota state agencies are working together to establish and report outcome-based performance measures that monitor the progress and effectiveness of Clean Water Fund activities. This inter-agency group completed a Clean Water Fund Performance Report in February 2012, 2014 and 2016. At the heart of the report is a suite of quantifiable performance measures. MDA's water quality monitoring program is reporting on performance measure EDWOM2: Changes over time in key water quality parameters for lakes, streams and wetlands and EDWOM3:Changes over time in pesticides, nitrate and other key water quality parameters in groundwater. ","• Number of target analytes considered (129) • Number of target analytes detected (57) ",,,,311480,6075,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2012,350000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6,Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011: (a) $350,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. "," Number of target analytes considered per year Number of target analytes detected per year   ","• Number of target analytes considered (126) • Number of target analytes detected (61) ",,,,342294,6075,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2011,350000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (b) $325,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year ","• Number of target analytes considered (114) • Number of target analytes detected (57) ",,,,,6075,,"2.25 ","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 1207,"Pesticide Monitoring Program- Increased Capability and Capacity",2010,325000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (b) $325,000 the first year and $350,000 the second year are to increase monitoring for pesticides and pesticide degradates in surface water and groundwater and to use data collected to assess pesticide use practices. ","• Number of target analytes considered per year • Number of target analytes detected per year ","• Number of target analytes considered (110) • Number of target analytes detected (56) ",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The purpose of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture's monitoring activities is to determine the presence and concentration of pesticides in Minnesota's groundwater and surface water. Monitoring information is used to characterize and assess the extent of pesticide impacts to Minnesota's water resources. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) has been monitoring the state's water resources continuously for more than 25 years. With over two decades of monitoring data, the MDA operates one of the few programs with sufficient long-term data to evaluate changes in water quality over time. Clean Water funding has allowed the MDA to increase the number of detectable pesticides, increase the sensitivity of detection of certain pesticides and increase the overall number of samples that can be analyzed on an annual basis. As a result, Minnesota’s pesticide water monitoring program is one of the most comprehensive programs in the country and is regarded as a national leader. The MDA increased the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. Pesticides on the new method are now being quantified at a parts-per-trillion (ppt) level, which is a shift from the previous parts-per-billion (ppb) level. Approximately 1600 pesticide samples were submitted for analysis during 2010, an increase of 600 samples compared to 2009. This increase of 600 samples should be maintained, but may be lower if dry weather conditions persist. To learn more about our monitoring program, please visit MDA's Clean Water Fund website or the MDA's pesticide monitoring website. ","In 2011, the MDA laboratory purchased equipment for a liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analytical methods. This switch to new methods has greatly expanded the MDA's monitoring capability. Whereas in 2009, MDA routinely analyzed for approximately 44 chemicals requiring three different analytical procedures. Clean Water Funds have supported an increase in the number of detectable pesticides from 44 in 2009 to 185 in 2022. The most significant advancement of the new methods is the ability to quantify concentrations for many of these chemicals at much lower levels. ","In general, the MDA looks for pesticides that are widely used and / or pose the greatest risk to groundwater or surface water. The MDA follows a pesticide selection process which prioritizes the specific compounds to be tested. Common compounds include pesticides applied in agricultural settings and those applied to lawns and gardens.The program is designed specifically to evaluate pesticides, however, analysis of nutrients and sediment is also considered. Annual water quality monitoring reports are available in the Minnesota Water Research Digital Library. Links to the most recent reports are listed below. 2022 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2021 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) 2020 Water Quality Monitoring Report (PDF) ",2010-01-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,"Bill ",VanRyswyk,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","422 Belgrade Avenue","North Mankato",MN,56003,"(507) 344-3203",Bill.Vanryswyk@state.mn.us,Monitoring,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pesticide-monitoring-program-increased-capability-and-capacity,,,, 37626,"Pomme de Terre River Association Surface Water Assessment Grant (SWAG)",2017,46133,,,,,,,,,,,0.3,"Pomme de Tere River Association","Local/Regional Government","The Pomme de Terre River Association will partner with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to conduct water quality monitoring in the Pomme de Terre River Watershed. The purpose will be to determine if waters meet the states non-point source pollution standards. The data collected will be utilized to produce the cycle two Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) report and supporting documents for the watershed. Through the utilization of this funding a total of 11 lakes and 7 stream reaches will be assessed.",,"Surface Water Assessment Grants ",2017-03-06,2019-01-15,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Stephanie,Adams,"Pomme de Tere River Association","12 Hwy 28 E Ste 2",Morris,MN,56267,"(320) 589-4886",,Monitoring,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Big Stone, Douglas, Grant, Otter Tail, Stevens, Swift",,"Pomme de Terre River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pomme-de-terre-river-association-surface-water-assessment-grant-swag,,,, 37637,"Pomme de Terre Pre-Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS)",2017,52000,,,,,,,,,,,0.4,"Pomme de Terre River Association","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project will establish a framework with the Pomme de Terre River Association (PDTRA), county staff, Soil and Water Conservation District staff, and state agencies that will outline their involvement throughout the development of the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) for the Pomme de Terre River watershed. This work will form the basis to establish restoration and protection strategies that local governments and watershed organizations can use to make decisions that will lead to protecting and restoring the waters in the watershed. This project will also prevent gaps identified in the Intensive Watershed Monitoring (IWM) sampling effort from slowing the timely completion of the WRAPS. ",,"Pomme de Terre River Watershed ",2017-01-24,2018-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Paul,Wymar,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N ","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(507) 476-4282",,"Education/Outreach/Engagement, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Big Stone, Douglas, Grant, Otter Tail, Stevens, Swift",,"Pomme de Terre River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pomme-de-terre-pre-watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategy-wraps,,,, 37657,"Pomme de Terre River Watershed Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) Model Extension",2017,19996,,,,,,,,,,,0.1,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to extend through 2016, calibrate, and validate the existing watershed model using Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) for the Pomme de Terre River Watershed. The contractor will produce an HSPF model that can readily be used to provide information to support conventional parameter Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies. ",,"Pomme de Terre River Watershed ",2017-04-03,2018-06-29,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Big Stone, Douglas, Grant, Otter Tail, Stevens, Swift",,"Pomme de Terre River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/pomme-de-terre-river-watershed-hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-model-extension,,,, 23163,"Private Well Protection",2020,750000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (d)","$750,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance, outreach, and interventions to reduce risks to private-well owners. "," Assess whether radium is commonly found in private well water at unsafe levels. Assess whether there are additional contaminants that should be evaluated due to their potential presence and hazard in private well water. Determine what, if anything, should happen next based on findings from the arsenic sampling survey and arsenic concentration predictive mapping. Pilot approaches for promoting well testing and financial assistance for mitigation. Equip local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. Promote private well testing. ",,,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,, 23163,"Private Well Protection",2019,400000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (e)","$400,000 the first year and $400,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance and outreach to reduce risks to private-well owners. "," Start assessing whether radium is commonly found in private well water at unsafe levels. Assess whether there are additional contaminants that should be evaluated due to their potential presence and hazard in private well water. Equip local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. Promote private well testing. Pilot approaches for promoting well testing. "," Developed the radium sampling plan and started sampling for gross alpha. Developed and distributed a communications toolkit for water testing laboratories to promote private well testing. Working in partnership with Choose Safe Places Minnesota to train childcare providers on private well testing. Collaborating with Becker County Soil and Water Conservation District to promote private well testing in Becker and Otter Tail counties. Created YouTube videos about private well testing, inspecting, and sealing and how to protect a private well before a flood. ",,,,,,,3,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,, 23163,"Private Well Protection",2018,400000,"MN Law 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 8(e)","$400,000 the first year and $400,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance and outreach to reduce risks to private-well owners. "," Finish statistical analysis for data. Present study results at state and national conferences. Publish two journal articles, one is accepted for publication in Groundwater journal in March 2018. "," Results of the statistical analysis are as follows: Filtering can make a significant difference in samples that were elevated then reduced in arsenic concentration a year later. Arsenic concentrations stabilize 3 to 6 months after well construction. Collecting samples at least 6 months after the well is drilled will give a more representative result of the long-term concentration. Collection of samples from plumbing rather than from the drill rig will give a more representative result.  Arsenic concentrations will not necessarily decrease with time, half the time it may increase a year later. Recommendation is for the homeowner to collect one more arsenic sample in the life of the well to verify the arsenic result, once the well has stabilized, at least 6 months afterward. Presented the study's results at the Geological Society of America in Seattle, WA in October 2017 The National Groundwater Association accepted the arsenic variability article and can be viewed online at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwat.12643/full. Will present the study’s results at the Geological Society of America – North-Central Section, 52nd Annual Meeting in Ames, Iowa in April 2018 ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,, 23163,"Private Well Protection",2017,325000,"MN Law 2015 Chapter 2 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","• Finish collecting the final 12-month water samples. • Perform statistical analysis on data. • Continue to track arsenic concentrations in new wells for a year after they are constructed to see if water chemistry stabilizes. • Determine how water sampling methods and the timing of sample collection contribute to arsenic test results in a new well. • Identify the conditions that control arsenic occurrence in groundwater. ","• Collected 109 water samples 12 months after the initial water samples were collected. • Started statistical analysis. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,, 23163,"Private Well Protection",2016,,"MN Law 2015 Chapter 2 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","• Finish all water sample collection. • Perform statistical analysis on data. • Track arsenic concentrations in new wells for a year after construction to see if water chemistry stabilizes. • Study how water sampling methods and the timing of collecting water samples contribute to arsenic test results in a new well. • Study the conditions that control arsenic occurrence in groundwater. • Develop guidance for well contractors and private well owners to reduce risks from arsenic in well water. ","• Collected an additional 129 initial water samples for new wells, for a total of 254 wells. • Collected 252 water samples 3-6 months after the initial water samples were collected. • Collected 136 water samples 12 months after the initial water samples were collected. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,, 23163,"Private Well Protection",2015,325000,"MN Law 2013 Chapter 137 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurrence and magnitude of contaminants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","• Track arsenic concentrations in new wells for a year after construction to see if water chemistry stabilizes. • Sample 125 newly constructed private water-supply wells by June 2015. • Determine how water sampling methods and the timing of collecting water samples contribute to arsenic test results in a new well. • Identify the conditions that control arsenic occurrence in groundwater. ","Sampled 162 newly constructed private water-supply wells. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,, 23163,"Private Well Protection",2014,325000,"MN Law 2013 Chapter 137 Article 2 Section 8(e)","$325,000 the first year and $325,000 the second year are for studying the occurence and magnitude of contaminiants in private wells and developing guidance to ensure that new well placement minimizes the potential for risks in cooperation with the commissioner of agriculture. ","Sample 200 - 205 newly constructed private water-supply wells by July 2015. ","Sampled 19 newly constructed private water-supply wells. ",,,,,,,1,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","This project aims to ensure private wells are a safe source of drinking water, are tested regularly, and water quality issues are addressed. Minnesota Department of Health collaborates with other state agencies, the U.S. Geological Survey, and local partners to promote private well testing and mitigation when necessary. This funding also makes it possible to conduct studies to better understand the distribution of contaminants in Minnesota well water and develop strategies to reduce private well users’ exposure to those contaminants. ","About 21 percent of Minnesotans (1.2 million people) get their drinking water from a private well. Private wells are not regulated beyond the construction of the well and an initial water quality test for coliform bacteria, nitrate, and arsenic. Private well users are responsible for regularly testing, inspecting, protecting, and sealing their private well. If a water test shows the private well does not meet drinking water standards for contaminants, the private well user is responsible for determining if and how they will reduce their exposure to the contaminant through treatment or using a different water source. Private well users are responsible for all costs associated with testing and treating their drinking water. This program is intended to understand and address potential health risks for those 1.2 million Minnesotans drinking water from private wells so that all Minnesotans, regardless of where their water comes from, have access to safe drinking water. ",,2013-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Chris,Elvrum,"Minnesota Department of Health","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155-2538,651-201-4598,chris.elvrum@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Grants/Contracts, Research","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/private-well-protection-arsenic-study,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2014,1500000,,,,,,,,,,,15,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2015,1500000,,,,,,,,,,,15,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2016,940000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2017,1060000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2018,50000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2019,1950000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2020,300000,,,,,,,,,,,.6,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2021,1180000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2022,270000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 4(h)",,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2023,1200000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 28159,"Protection and Restoration of Water Quality in Minnesota National Parks",2024,1000000,,,,,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","Local/Regional Government","This will fund a competitive grant program for sewer projects that will help protect or restore the water quality of waters in national parks located within Minnesota. ",,,2013-07-01,2025-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Dave,Sahli,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Road North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2687",David.sahli@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Restoration/Enhancement","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,"Vermilion River",https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/protection-and-restoration-water-quality-minnesota-national-parks,,,, 37423,"Public Notice Assistance for Lake Winona Nutrient Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)",2017,7469,,,,,,,,,,,.03,"Emmons & Olivier Resources Inc","For-Profit Business/Entity","This project is for technical assistance during the Lake Winona Nutrient Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) public notice and revisions to the document prior to sending to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for final approval. ",,"Long Prairie River Watershed ",2016-09-12,2018-03-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Denise,Oakes,MPCA,"714 Lake Ave Ste 220","Detroit Lakes",MN,56501,"(218) 846-8119",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Douglas,,"Long Prairie River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/public-notice-assistance-lake-winona-nutrient-total-maximum-daily-load-tmdl,,,, 37645,"Scenario Application Manager Spring 2017 Trainings",2017,74991,,,,,,,,,,,0.25,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The contractor will provide 4 day-long training sessions for the Scenario Analysis Manager (SAM) and 2 Processing Application Tool for HSPF (PATH) sessions. The SAM tool’s framework currently consists of a pre-processor (PATH) for interactively translating HSPF model application files, a Geographic Information System (GIS) for best management practice (BMP) site selection, a BMP database with pollutant removal efficiencies and associated costs, and scenario analysis, optimization, and reporting capabilities. The decision support tool provides a user friendly, comprehensive approach to achieve the water quality improvement goals set by the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) assessments, Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS), and watershed restoration programs. ",,,2017-01-31,2017-10-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/scenario-application-manager-spring-2017-trainings,,,, 37656,"Scenario Application Manager (SAM) Project Creation and Support",2017,69995,,,,,,,,,,,0.32,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The contractor will collect and process the necessary files needed to develop a Processing Application Tool for HSPF (PATH) and Scenario Application Manager (SAM) project for 30 HUC 8 watersheds in Minnesota. SAM provides a graphical interface to the Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) model applications and expands the state’s investment in HSPF to a broader audience in support of the development of Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies and Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) reports. ",,,2017-04-03,2018-06-29,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/scenario-application-manager-sam-project-creation-and-support,,,, 37676,"Scenario Application Manager (SAM) Enhancement for Forest Best Management Practices",2017,211886,,,,,,,,,,,0.45,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to develop forestry related best management practice (BMP) pollutant reduction/management efficiencies, costs, and management information applicable to Minnesota forests and incorporate these BMPs into the Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) model Scenario Application Manager (SAM) tool. By incorporating forestry BMPs into the existing SAM tool, forestry related management scenarios can be evaluated for potential impacts on surface waters and can inform the development of watershed restoration and protection strategies. ",,,2017-06-01,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Karen,Evens,MPCA,"525 S Lake Ave Ste 400",Duluth,MN,55802,"(218) 302-6644",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/scenario-application-manager-sam-enhancement-forest-best-management-practices,,,, 37689,"Scenario Application Manager Project Support and Creation 2017/2018",2017,27136,,,,,,,,,,,0.11,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this work order is to collect and process the watershed specific files needed to create the Scenario Application Manager (SAM) project files to apply the SAM software in selected major watersheds in Minnesota where an Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) model has been developed. This work order will also involve technical support for the SAM users who are applying the SAM projects. ",,,2017-07-14,2018-06-29,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/scenario-application-manager-project-support-and-creation-20172018,,,, 37425,"Scenario Application Manager (SAM) Fall 2016 Trainings",2017,44982,,,,,,,,,,,.16,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The contractor will provide 3 Scenario Analysis Manager (SAM) training sessions in the fall of 2016 for use with Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) model applications. ",,,2016-09-28,2017-04-28,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/scenario-application-manager-sam-fall-2016-trainings,,,, 3643,"Sealing Unused Private Drinking Water Wells",2012,250000,"Minnesota Laws 2011, chapter 6, article 2, section 8(c) ","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for cost-share assistance to public and private well owners for up to 50 percent of the cost of sealing unused wells. MDH provided $250,000 to BWSR to administer and awarded funds to local government units as part of their competitive grant program. Local government units them provided cost-share assistance to private well owners to seal their unused wells. ","Evaluation and Outcome PlanEvaluation and outcome plans are required as a part of the grant agreement between BWSR and the grantee. These required plans consist of verifying project installation and creating operation and maintenance plans to ensure the project is functioning as designed.   Funded projects meet locally identified water quality goals within the larger scope of Minnesota's clean water efforts. Projects reduce pollutant loads aimed at improving watershed health over time. The long-term evaluation of clean water fund projects will be monitored as part of the state’s intensive watershed monitoring strategy. ","Sealed 266 unused private wells. ",,201924,,176575,31505,,0.33,"Multiple Local Government Units","Local/Regional Government","Approximately 70 percent of all Minnesotans rely on groundwater as their primary source of drinking water. Wells used for drinking water must be properly sealed when removed from service to protect both public health and Minnesota’s invaluable groundwater resources. The Minnesota Department of Health with the assistance of the Board of Water and Soil Resources protects both public health and groundwater by assuring the proper sealing of unused wells.” Clean Water funds are being provided to home owners as a 50% cost-share assistance for sealing unused private drinking water wells. These funds are to be used to provide assistance to well owners for the sealing of unused wells in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4725. ",,,2012-01-01,2021-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"2012 CWF - MDH Well Sealing - Map, FY 2012 Well Head Grant Awards_LCC",,,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,,,,"(651) 296-3767",,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Benton, Big Stone, Carver, Crow Wing, Douglas, Hennepin, Mahnomen, Martin, Mille Lacs, Norman, Otter Tail, Ramsey, Rice, Sherburne, Wright",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sealing-unused-private-drinking-water-wells,"Wayne Zellmer – BWSR Grants Coordinator; Matt Drewitz – BWSR South Region Clean Water Specialist; Art Persons – MDH Planning Supervisor Drinking Water Protection; Jeff Hrubes – BWSR North Region Clean Water Specialist; Marcey Westrick – BWSR Metro Clean Water Specialist; Julie Westerlund –DNR Clean Water Coordinator; Robert L. Sip – MDA Environmental Policy Specialist; Anna Kerr – MPCA – Stormwater / TMDL Coordinator; Nick Proulx –DNR Central Region Clean Water Legacy Specialist; Karen Evens - MPCA – Watershed Projects Manager; Joshua Stamper – MDA Research Scientist, Pesticide & Fertilizer Management; Norman R. Mofjeld – MDA Hydrologist P.G. Well Management Section; ","The 20-member BWSR board consists of representatives of local and state government agencies and citizens. Members are appointed by the governor of the state of Minnesota consistent with Minnesota Statutes 103B.101. Board members at the time the grant was made were: County Commissioner Appointees: Quentin Fairbanks; Tom Loveall; Brian Napstad; Soil and Water Conservation District Appointees: Paul Langseth, Louise Smallidge and Bob Burandt; Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization Appointees: Gene Tiedemann, LuAnn Tolliver and Todd Foster; Citizen Appointees: Paul Brutlag ; Gerald Van Amburg; John Meyer; Cities & Townships: Sandy Hooker – Township; Christy Jo Fogarty – Metro City; Keith Mykleseth – Non-Metro City; Agency: Chris Elvrum - Minnesota Department of Health; Rebecca Flood - Pollution Control Agency; Tom Landwehr - Department of Natural Resources; Matt Wohlman - Minnesota Department of Agriculture; Faye Sleeper - Minnesota Extension Service; ",, 3643,"Sealing Unused Private Drinking Water Wells",2014,290000,"Laws of Minnesota 2013, chapter 137, article 2, section 8(c)","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for cost-share assistance to public and private well owners for up to 50 percent of the cost of sealing unused wells. MDH provided $250,000 to BWSR to administer and awarded funds to local government units as part of their competitive grant program. Local government units them provided cost-share assistance to private well owners to seal their unused wells. ","To seal at least 170 unused private wells by December 31, 2016. ","Sealed 391 unused private wells. ",,256698,,290000,13843,,0.33,"Multiple Local Government Units","Local/Regional Government","Approximately 70 percent of all Minnesotans rely on groundwater as their primary source of drinking water. Wells used for drinking water must be properly sealed when removed from service to protect both public health and Minnesota’s invaluable groundwater resources. The Minnesota Department of Health with the assistance of the Board of Water and Soil Resources protects both public health and groundwater by assuring the proper sealing of unused wells.” Clean Water funds are being provided to home owners as a 50% cost-share assistance for sealing unused private drinking water wells. These funds are to be used to provide assistance to well owners for the sealing of unused wells in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4725. ",,,2012-01-01,2021-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"2012 CWF - MDH Well Sealing - Map, FY 2012 Well Head Grant Awards_LCC",,,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,,,,"(651) 296-3767",,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Benton, Big Stone, Carver, Crow Wing, Douglas, Hennepin, Mahnomen, Martin, Mille Lacs, Norman, Otter Tail, Ramsey, Rice, Sherburne, Wright",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sealing-unused-private-drinking-water-wells,"Wayne Zellmer – BWSR Grants Coordinator; Matt Drewitz – BWSR South Region Clean Water Specialist; Art Persons – MDH Planning Supervisor Drinking Water Protection; Jeff Hrubes – BWSR North Region Clean Water Specialist; Marcey Westrick – BWSR Metro Clean Water Specialist; Julie Westerlund –DNR Clean Water Coordinator; Robert L. Sip – MDA Environmental Policy Specialist; Anna Kerr – MPCA – Stormwater / TMDL Coordinator; Nick Proulx –DNR Central Region Clean Water Legacy Specialist; Karen Evens - MPCA – Watershed Projects Manager; Joshua Stamper – MDA Research Scientist, Pesticide & Fertilizer Management; Norman R. Mofjeld – MDA Hydrologist P.G. Well Management Section; ","The 20-member BWSR board consists of representatives of local and state government agencies and citizens. Members are appointed by the governor of the state of Minnesota consistent with Minnesota Statutes 103B.101. Board members at the time the grant was made were: County Commissioner Appointees: Quentin Fairbanks; Tom Loveall; Brian Napstad; Soil and Water Conservation District Appointees: Paul Langseth, Louise Smallidge and Bob Burandt; Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization Appointees: Gene Tiedemann, LuAnn Tolliver and Todd Foster; Citizen Appointees: Paul Brutlag ; Gerald Van Amburg; John Meyer; Cities & Townships: Sandy Hooker – Township; Christy Jo Fogarty – Metro City; Keith Mykleseth – Non-Metro City; Agency: Chris Elvrum - Minnesota Department of Health; Rebecca Flood - Pollution Control Agency; Tom Landwehr - Department of Natural Resources; Matt Wohlman - Minnesota Department of Agriculture; Faye Sleeper - Minnesota Extension Service; ",, 3643,"Sealing Unused Private Drinking Water Wells",2017,112000,"Minnesota Laws 2015, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 8(c)","$113,000 the first year and $112,000 the second year are for cost-share assistance to public and private well owners for up to 50 percent of the cost of sealing unused wells. ","To seal at about 226 unused private wells by June 3, 2019. ","Sealed 203 unused private wells. ",,47915,,,,,0.33,"Multiple Local Government Units","Local/Regional Government","Approximately 70 percent of all Minnesotans rely on groundwater as their primary source of drinking water. Wells used for drinking water must be properly sealed when removed from service to protect both public health and Minnesota’s invaluable groundwater resources. The Minnesota Department of Health with the assistance of the Board of Water and Soil Resources protects both public health and groundwater by assuring the proper sealing of unused wells.” Clean Water funds are being provided to home owners as a 50% cost-share assistance for sealing unused private drinking water wells. These funds are to be used to provide assistance to well owners for the sealing of unused wells in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4725. ",,,2012-01-01,2021-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"2012 CWF - MDH Well Sealing - Map, FY 2012 Well Head Grant Awards_LCC",,,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,,,,"(651) 296-3767",,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Benton, Big Stone, Carver, Crow Wing, Douglas, Hennepin, Mahnomen, Martin, Mille Lacs, Norman, Otter Tail, Ramsey, Rice, Sherburne, Wright",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sealing-unused-private-drinking-water-wells,"Wayne Zellmer – BWSR Grants Coordinator; Matt Drewitz – BWSR South Region Clean Water Specialist; Art Persons – MDH Planning Supervisor Drinking Water Protection; Jeff Hrubes – BWSR North Region Clean Water Specialist; Marcey Westrick – BWSR Metro Clean Water Specialist; Julie Westerlund –DNR Clean Water Coordinator; Robert L. Sip – MDA Environmental Policy Specialist; Anna Kerr – MPCA – Stormwater / TMDL Coordinator; Nick Proulx –DNR Central Region Clean Water Legacy Specialist; Karen Evens - MPCA – Watershed Projects Manager; Joshua Stamper – MDA Research Scientist, Pesticide & Fertilizer Management; Norman R. Mofjeld – MDA Hydrologist P.G. Well Management Section; ","The 20-member BWSR board consists of representatives of local and state government agencies and citizens. Members are appointed by the governor of the state of Minnesota consistent with Minnesota Statutes 103B.101. Board members at the time the grant was made were: County Commissioner Appointees: Quentin Fairbanks; Tom Loveall; Brian Napstad; Soil and Water Conservation District Appointees: Paul Langseth, Louise Smallidge and Bob Burandt; Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization Appointees: Gene Tiedemann, LuAnn Tolliver and Todd Foster; Citizen Appointees: Paul Brutlag ; Gerald Van Amburg; John Meyer; Cities & Townships: Sandy Hooker – Township; Christy Jo Fogarty – Metro City; Keith Mykleseth – Non-Metro City; Agency: Chris Elvrum - Minnesota Department of Health; Rebecca Flood - Pollution Control Agency; Tom Landwehr - Department of Natural Resources; Matt Wohlman - Minnesota Department of Agriculture; Faye Sleeper - Minnesota Extension Service; ",, 3643,"Sealing Unused Private Drinking Water Wells",2019,250000,"Minnesota Laws 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 8(c)","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for cost-share assistance to public and private well owners for up to 50 percent of the cost of sealing unused wells. ",,"Sealed 324 unused private wells. ",,17800,,,,,.33,"Multiple Local Government Units","Local/Regional Government","Approximately 70 percent of all Minnesotans rely on groundwater as their primary source of drinking water. Wells used for drinking water must be properly sealed when removed from service to protect both public health and Minnesota’s invaluable groundwater resources. The Minnesota Department of Health with the assistance of the Board of Water and Soil Resources protects both public health and groundwater by assuring the proper sealing of unused wells.” Clean Water funds are being provided to home owners as a 50% cost-share assistance for sealing unused private drinking water wells. These funds are to be used to provide assistance to well owners for the sealing of unused wells in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4725. ",,,2012-01-01,2021-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,"2012 CWF - MDH Well Sealing - Map, FY 2012 Well Head Grant Awards_LCC",,,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,,,,"(651) 296-3767",,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,"Benton, Big Stone, Carver, Crow Wing, Douglas, Hennepin, Mahnomen, Martin, Mille Lacs, Norman, Otter Tail, Ramsey, Rice, Sherburne, Wright",,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/sealing-unused-private-drinking-water-wells,"Wayne Zellmer – BWSR Grants Coordinator; Matt Drewitz – BWSR South Region Clean Water Specialist; Art Persons – MDH Planning Supervisor Drinking Water Protection; Jeff Hrubes – BWSR North Region Clean Water Specialist; Marcey Westrick – BWSR Metro Clean Water Specialist; Julie Westerlund –DNR Clean Water Coordinator; Robert L. Sip – MDA Environmental Policy Specialist; Anna Kerr – MPCA – Stormwater / TMDL Coordinator; Nick Proulx –DNR Central Region Clean Water Legacy Specialist; Karen Evens - MPCA – Watershed Projects Manager; Joshua Stamper – MDA Research Scientist, Pesticide & Fertilizer Management; Norman R. Mofjeld – MDA Hydrologist P.G. Well Management Section; ","The 20-member BWSR board consists of representatives of local and state government agencies and citizens. Members are appointed by the governor of the state of Minnesota consistent with Minnesota Statutes 103B.101. Board members at the time the grant was made were: County Commissioner Appointees: Quentin Fairbanks; Tom Loveall; Brian Napstad; Soil and Water Conservation District Appointees: Paul Langseth, Louise Smallidge and Bob Burandt; Watershed District or Watershed Management Organization Appointees: Gene Tiedemann, LuAnn Tolliver and Todd Foster; Citizen Appointees: Paul Brutlag ; Gerald Van Amburg; John Meyer; Cities & Townships: Sandy Hooker – Township; Christy Jo Fogarty – Metro City; Keith Mykleseth – Non-Metro City; Agency: Chris Elvrum - Minnesota Department of Health; Rebecca Flood - Pollution Control Agency; Tom Landwehr - Department of Natural Resources; Matt Wohlman - Minnesota Department of Agriculture; Faye Sleeper - Minnesota Extension Service; ",, 36689,"Six Mile Creek - East Auburn Stormwater Enhacement Project",2017,262520,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(b) ","$10,187,000 the first year and $10,188,000 the second year are for grants to protect and restore surface water and drinking water; to keep water on the land; to protect, enhance, and restore water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams; and to protect groundwater and drinking water, including feedlot water quality and subsurface sewage treatment system projects and stream bank, stream channel, shoreline restoration, and ravine stabilization projects. The projects must use practices demonstrated to be effective, be of long-lasting public benefit, include a match, and be consistent with total maximum daily load (TMDL) implementation plans, watershed restoration and protection strategies (WRAPS), or local water management plans or their equivalents. A portion of these funds may be used to seek administrative efficiencies through shared resources by multiple local governmental units.","2 tons of sediment/year and 39 lbs of phosphorus/year","This project has resulted in an estimated annual reduction of 31.6 pounds of Phosphorus. This was also completed during the life of the grant. Construction of an iron-enhanced sand filter in the western pond. Construction of a filtration bench in the eastern pond. Development and construction of a planting plan on the publicly-owned site. Focus will be native vegetation and pollinator habitat. The City of Victoria and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) will issue an Request for Proposals (RFP) to procure professional services to prepare plans and specifications; bid the project consistent with requirements outlined in item 4.6 of the grant agreement; and identify and apply for permits. The City and District will review and concur on all plans and specs.","achieved most of the proposed outcomes",67093,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",262520,58172,"Members for Minnehaha Creek WD are: Bill Becker, Brian Shekleton, Dick Miller, Kurt Rogness, Pamela Blixt, Sherry Davis White, William Olson",,"Minnehaha Creek WD","Local/Regional Government","The project is part of the Six Mile-Halsted Bay Subwatershed Plan, a planning partnership currently underway which aims to protect and improve natural resources within this priority subwatershed by working closely with partnering agencies to integrate capital investments and maximize public return on investment. This project will enhance two existing stormwater ponds to enhance treatment of phosphorus as well as incorporate treatment of the Church Lake outlet, a lake which routinely fails to meet state water quality standards and contributes to the water quality impairment of East Auburn. The retrofits will include the addition of both a filtration bench and an iron enhanced filtration bench. These improvements will not only enhance phosphorus removal, but also will target dissolved phosphorus, which is rarely accounted for in stormwater BMP application and is a significant driver of the impairment in Lake Auburn. ",,,,,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Anna,Brown,"Minnehaha Creek WD","15320 Minnetonka Blvd",Minnetonka,MN,55345,"952-641-4522 x 522",abrown@minnehahacreek.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Carver,,"Mississippi River - Twin Cities",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/six-mile-creek-east-auburn-stormwater-enhacement-project,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html","See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html and http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/boarddirectory.pdf","Annie Felix-Gerth",No 36691,"Soil Investigations for Liquid Manure Storage Areas in Hydrologically Vulnerable Townships in Douglas County",2017,93000,"Laws of Minnesota 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 7(c) ","$6,000,000 the first year and $6,000,000 the second year are for targeted local resource protection and enhancement grants and statewide program enhancements for technical assistance, citizen and community outreach, and training and certification, as well as projects, practices, and programs that supplement or otherwise exceed current state standards for protection, enhancement, and restoration of water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams or that protect groundwater from degradation, including compliance.","This project will result in a feedlot inventory of those registered feedlots having an Unpermitted Liquid Manure Storage. Specifically, this project will conduct soil investigation and the development of a Comprehensive Manure Nutrient Plan (CMNP)for ea","Work was completed as per the approved work plan and included the final engineering assistance cost share contract was completed for the grant. Only 50% of the original grant was spent. The reason for this was many of the existing Ag waste systems that were originally lined up for soil boring, the landowners decided that the pits will no longer be used and decided to close the pits. The grant area was chosen because of the large number of dairy farms and with the past year of milk price these landowners decided to get out of the dairy business.","Achieved some proposed outcomes",27692,"LOCAL LEVERAGED FUNDS",46379,,"Members for Douglas SWCD are: Dave Wolf, Gerhard Thoennes, Jon Schneider, Ken Rutten, Paul Barsness",0.3,"Douglas SWCD","Local/Regional Government","This project seeks to inventory twenty registered feedlots identified as having an Unpermitted Liquid Manure Storage Area. Specifically, this inventory would include offering cost-share for soils investigations. These feedlots are located in three townships that have also been identified as having groundwater that is vulnerable to nutrient pollution, necessitating a need for nitrate testing per MN Department of Agriculture. These townships also house the vast majority of remaining unpermitted Liquid Manure Storage Areas in the County. ",,,2017-01-25,2019-12-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Jerome,Haggenmiller,"Douglas SWCD","900 Robert St Ste 102",Alexandria,MN,56308,320-763-3191,jerome.haggenmiller@mn.nacdnet.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources",,Douglas,,"Chippewa River, Long Prairie River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/soil-investigations-liquid-manure-storage-areas-hydrologically-vulnerable-townships,"See http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/index.html ","http://www.bwsr.state.mn.us/board ","Annie Felix-Gerth ", 10000116,"Source Water Protection Competitive Grant",2017,5308,"Chapter 91 - HF No 707; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2017","$2,587,000 the first year and $2,907,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,6976,"Grantee's own financial resources",6976,,N/A,,"Sunset Ridge of Annandale","For-Profit Business/Entity","Drill new well and seal well 265277",,,2017-09-21,2018-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Cindy,Chrast,"Sunset Ridge of Annandale","4986 County Road 6 NW; PO Box 705",Annandale,MN,55302,320-274-8060,SSRidge@lakedalelink.net,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Wright,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-competitive-grant-129,N/A,"Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Karla Peterson, Supervisor, Engineer Administrative,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No 10000150,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2017,1754,"Chapter 91 - HF No 707; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2017","$2,587,000 the first year and $2,907,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,3540,,N/A,,"City of Buffalo","Local/Regional Government","Install community water conservation garden",,,2017-08-24,2018-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Cara,Hesse,"City of Buffalo","212 Central Avenue",Buffalo,MN,55313,763-684-5432,cara.hesse@ci.buffalo.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Wright,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-338,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2022,3942000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$3,942,000 the first year and $3,942,000 the second year are for protecting sources of drinking water, including planning, implementation, and surveillance activities and grants to local governments and public water systems. ",,"Protect the approximately 400,000 acres of vulnerable land surrounding drinking water wellhead areas statewide by 2034. Conduct ongoing source water protection planning and implementation for the state’s 500 vulnerable community public water systems. Complete first generation source water protection plans for the remaining 420 community public water systems by 2025. Complete revised source water assessments for all 23 surface water systems by 2025. Complete source water intake protection planning by 2027. Complete pilot source water protection planning for 10 non-community public water systems with at-risk populations by 2027. ",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2021,3942000,"M.L. 2021, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 7","$3,942,000 the first year and $3,942,000 the second year are for protecting sources of drinking water, including planning, implementation, and surveillance activities and grants to local governments and public water systems ","Protect the approximately 400,000 acres of vulnerable land surrounding drinking water wellhead areas statewide by 2034. Conduct ongoing source water protection planning and implementation for the state’s 500 vulnerable community public water systems. Complete first generation source water protection plans for the remaining 420 community public water systems by 2025. Complete revised source water assessments for all 23 surface water systems by 2025. Complete source water intake protection planning by 2027. Complete pilot source water protection planning for 10 non-community public water systems with at-risk populations by 2027. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2020,2747000,"M.L. 2019, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 8","$2,747,000 the first year and $2,747,000 the second year are for protecting drinking water sources. ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2019,2907000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$2,587,000 the first year and $2,907,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources.  ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2018,2587000,"M.L. 2017, Chp. 91, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$2,587,000 the first year and $2,907,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources.  ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,2346000,241000,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2017,1900000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources. ","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020. ",,,,,1645400,254600,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2016,1900000,"M.L. 2015, Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 8 (b)","$1,900,000 the first year and $1,900,000 thesecond year are for protection of drinking water sources.","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020.",,,,,1622220,277780,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2015,1015000,"M.L. 2013, Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec 8 (b)","$1,615,000 the first year and $1,615,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources. Note:This appropriation is split between source water protection plan development and grants to encourage implementation.","Engage all vulnerable community public water supply systems in source water protection planning by 2020.","As of the end of FY2014, approximately 253 of approximately 430 vulnerable public water supplies have completed wellhead protection plans. Most public water supplies have completed inner wellhead management zone potential contaminant source inventories, which are being updated.",,,,,145754,,11,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2014,900000,"M.L. 2013, Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec 8 (b)","$1,615,000 the first year and $1,615,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources.",,"As of the end of FY2014, approximately 253 of approximately 430 vulnerable public water supplies have completed wellhead protection plans. Most public water supplies have completed inner wellhead management zone potential contaminant source inventories, which are being updated.",,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2013,861297,"M.L. 2011, Chp. 6, Art. 2, Sec.8(b)","$1,415,000 the first year and $1,415,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water resources.",,,,,,678702,182595,,10,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2012,890000,"M.L. 2011, Chp. 6, Art. 2, Sec.8(b)","$1,415,000 the first year and $1,415,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water resources.",,,,,,676237,216134,,9,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2011,895436,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (a)","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,215,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources, including assisting 30 or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 60 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with the development and implementation of community source water protection plans before new community wells are installed, and awarding ten or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 20 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with source water protection implementation grants.",,,,,,,,,6.75,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 663,"Source Water Protection Planning",2010,122579,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172, Art. 2, Sec 7 (a)","$1,200,000 the first year and $1,215,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources, including assisting 30 or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 60 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with the development and implementation of community source water protection plans before new community wells are installed, and awarding ten or more communities in fiscal year 2010 and 20 or more communities in fiscal year 2011 with source water protection implementation grants.",,,,,,,,,2,"Minnesota Department of Health","State Government","Minnesota Department of Health has been collaborating with cities and other community water suppliers since 1993 to develop and implement source water protection plans.  Support from the Clean Water Legacy expands and accelerates the number of water suppliers that can be assisted each year in undertaking protection planning and implementation activities.  Utilizing the Clean Water Fund to accelerate source water protection planning, it is the goal to have all vulnerable community water suppliers developing plans by the year 2020. Appropriations from the Clean Water Fund are also used to provide grants to public water supply systems to help them implement their source water protection plans.   ","Source water is untreated water from streams, rivers, lakes, or underground aquifers that is used to provide public drinking water for human consumption.  In Minnesota, the public water systems that use groundwater provide drinking water to 2.9 million Minnesotans.  Some water treatment is necessary and community public water suppliers treat most drinking water before it enters the home.  However, the cost of treatment and the risk to public health can be reduced by protecting source water from contamination.  Benefits of this approach may include: Reducing the need for new wells and related costs Reducing the need for costly water treatment Protecting our drinking water from potential contaminants of emerging concern Source Water Protection (Wellhead Protection) planning is the mechanism used to identify the vulnerabilities of source water, inventory potential contaminants to the aquifers, and develop strategies to manage and mitigate risk. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Steve,Robertson,"Minnesota Department of Health","P.O. Box 64975","St. Paul",MN,55164-0975,"(612) 201-4648",Steve.Robertson@state.mn.us,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Health",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-planning,,,, 37388,"Source Water Protection Plan Implementation Grant",2017,9385,"Chapter 91 - HF No 707; Art 2; Sec 8 (b) MSL 2017","$2,587,000 the first year and $2,907,000 the second year are for protection of drinking water sources","Protect the drinking water source","Protect the drinking water source",,,N/A,10000,,N/A,,"City of Waconia","Local/Regional Government","Seal up to 12 private wells.",,,2016-12-13,2018-04-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Craig,Eldred,"City of Waconia","201 South Vine Street",Waconia,MN,55387,952-442-4265,celdred@waconia.org,Grants/Contracts,"Minnesota Department of Health",,Carver,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/source-water-protection-plan-implementation-grant-299,N/A,"James Walsh, Hydrologist Supervisor,Jenilynn Marchand, Planning Program Supervisor,Steve Robertson, Supervisor SWP Unit",N/A,No 10009696,"Statewide Conservation Reporting System (eLINK) Support",2017,60000,,,,,,,,,,,.6,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","This agreement is for Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) to provide statewide conservation reporting system support services in order to support Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) programs. Support services will be aimed at both MPCA staff and local government recipients of grants. The goal of BWSR’s conservation reporting system (eLINK) is to record soil and water conservation projects/programs implemented by local governmental units (LGUs) and provide the documentation that is needed to comply with various state and federal program reporting requirements. Project locations will be used with natural resource information to estimate soil erosion and resultant environmental benefits from project implementation. ",,"BWSR's Conservation Tracking System - eLINK ",2016-11-01,2022-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gwen,Steel,"Board of Water and Soil Resources ","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 600-8390",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-conservation-reporting-system-elink-support,,,, 10009696,"Statewide Conservation Reporting System (eLINK) Support",2018,60000,,,,,,,,,,,.6,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","This agreement is for Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) to provide statewide conservation reporting system support services in order to support Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) programs. Support services will be aimed at both MPCA staff and local government recipients of grants. The goal of BWSR’s conservation reporting system (eLINK) is to record soil and water conservation projects/programs implemented by local governmental units (LGUs) and provide the documentation that is needed to comply with various state and federal program reporting requirements. Project locations will be used with natural resource information to estimate soil erosion and resultant environmental benefits from project implementation. ",,"BWSR's Conservation Tracking System - eLINK ",2016-11-01,2022-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gwen,Steel,"Board of Water and Soil Resources ","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 600-8390",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-conservation-reporting-system-elink-support,,,, 10009696,"Statewide Conservation Reporting System (eLINK) Support",2019,60000,,,,,,,,,,,.6,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","This agreement is for Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) to provide statewide conservation reporting system support services in order to support Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) programs. Support services will be aimed at both MPCA staff and local government recipients of grants. The goal of BWSR’s conservation reporting system (eLINK) is to record soil and water conservation projects/programs implemented by local governmental units (LGUs) and provide the documentation that is needed to comply with various state and federal program reporting requirements. Project locations will be used with natural resource information to estimate soil erosion and resultant environmental benefits from project implementation. ",,"BWSR's Conservation Tracking System - eLINK ",2016-11-01,2022-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gwen,Steel,"Board of Water and Soil Resources ","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 600-8390",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-conservation-reporting-system-elink-support,,,, 10009696,"Statewide Conservation Reporting System (eLINK) Support",2020,61300,,,,,,,,,,,.61,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","This agreement is for Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) to provide statewide conservation reporting system support services in order to support Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) programs. Support services will be aimed at both MPCA staff and local government recipients of grants. The goal of BWSR’s conservation reporting system (eLINK) is to record soil and water conservation projects/programs implemented by local governmental units (LGUs) and provide the documentation that is needed to comply with various state and federal program reporting requirements. Project locations will be used with natural resource information to estimate soil erosion and resultant environmental benefits from project implementation. ",,"BWSR's Conservation Tracking System - eLINK ",2016-11-01,2022-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gwen,Steel,"Board of Water and Soil Resources ","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 600-8390",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-conservation-reporting-system-elink-support,,,, 10009696,"Statewide Conservation Reporting System (eLINK) Support",2021,61300,,,,,,,,,,,.61,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","This agreement is for Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) to provide statewide conservation reporting system support services in order to support Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) programs. Support services will be aimed at both MPCA staff and local government recipients of grants. The goal of BWSR’s conservation reporting system (eLINK) is to record soil and water conservation projects/programs implemented by local governmental units (LGUs) and provide the documentation that is needed to comply with various state and federal program reporting requirements. Project locations will be used with natural resource information to estimate soil erosion and resultant environmental benefits from project implementation. ",,"BWSR's Conservation Tracking System - eLINK ",2016-11-01,2022-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gwen,Steel,"Board of Water and Soil Resources ","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 600-8390",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-conservation-reporting-system-elink-support,,,, 10009696,"Statewide Conservation Reporting System (eLINK) Support",2022,61300,,,,,,,,,,,.61,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","This agreement is for Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) to provide statewide conservation reporting system support services in order to support Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) programs. Support services will be aimed at both MPCA staff and local government recipients of grants. The goal of BWSR’s conservation reporting system (eLINK) is to record soil and water conservation projects/programs implemented by local governmental units (LGUs) and provide the documentation that is needed to comply with various state and federal program reporting requirements. Project locations will be used with natural resource information to estimate soil erosion and resultant environmental benefits from project implementation. ",,"BWSR's Conservation Tracking System - eLINK ",2016-11-01,2022-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gwen,Steel,"Board of Water and Soil Resources ","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 600-8390",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-conservation-reporting-system-elink-support,,,, 10009696,"Statewide Conservation Reporting System (eLINK) Support",2023,54800,,,,,,,,,,,.54,"Board of Water and Soil Resources","State Government","This agreement is for Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) to provide statewide conservation reporting system support services in order to support Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) programs. Support services will be aimed at both MPCA staff and local government recipients of grants. The goal of BWSR’s conservation reporting system (eLINK) is to record soil and water conservation projects/programs implemented by local governmental units (LGUs) and provide the documentation that is needed to comply with various state and federal program reporting requirements. Project locations will be used with natural resource information to estimate soil erosion and resultant environmental benefits from project implementation. ",,"BWSR's Conservation Tracking System - eLINK ",2016-11-01,2022-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gwen,Steel,"Board of Water and Soil Resources ","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 600-8390",,"Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-conservation-reporting-system-elink-support,,,, 19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2012,200000,,,,,,81824,Federal,,,,1.01,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,, 19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2013,200000,,,,,,,,,,,1.01,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,, 19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2014,100000,,,,,,,,,,,.5,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,, 19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2015,100000,,,,,,,,,,,.81,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,, 19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2016,108547,,,,,,,,,,,.67,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,, 19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2017,200000,,,,,,,,,,,1.56,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,, 19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2018,99999,,,,,,,,,,,.26,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,, 19380,"Statewide Sediment Network",2019,99999,,,,,,,,,,,.8,"United States Geological Survey (USGS)","Federal Government","The Statewide Sediment Network was established to measure the levels of suspended sediment concentrations and particle size distributions at eight sites across Minnesota to evaluate the amount of sediment carried by rivers. USGS sample collection and laboratory analysis techniques provide a more rigorous, robust, and technically accurate measure of sediment in water than the current use of total suspended solids as the measure of sediment in water. A primary goal of the project is to develop correction factors for use with the state's total suspended solids sampling so sediment loads are not underestimated. The project is also beginning to incorporate the use of in-situ turbidity and accoustic Doppler sensors to provide sediment load calculations that will be in near-real time and to reduce sediment sampling costs. A final component of the project includes the sampling and measurement of bedload which is sediment that moves along the bottom of a river and is not captured by normal surface water sampling. ",,,2012-01-03,2015-09-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Gregory,Johnson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2471",,"Monitoring, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-sediment-network,,,, 37634,"Statewide Chloride Management Plan: Stakeholder input and rural BMP development",2017,63000,,,,,,,,,,,.35,"Fortin Consulting","For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project will be to research and develop statewide winter maintenance best management practices (BMPs) for inclusion in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan and Winter Maintenance Assessment tool (WMAt). The WMAt is a necessary technical resource and planning tool for stakeholders and permittees to implement the chloride reduction strategies described in the Statewide Chloride Management Plan. This project will enhance the WMAt so that it is an effective planning tool to assist local winter maintenance professionals to reduce salt use. This will require extensive coordination with stakeholders to gather feedback and suggestions to incorporate new winter maintenance BMPs or modify existing BMPs. ",,,2017-03-20,2019-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Rachel,Olmanson,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2473",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-chloride-management-plan-stakeholder-input-and-rural-bmp-development,,,, 37433,"Statewide Chloride Management Plan and Winter Maintenance Assessment tool (WMAt)",2017,93388,,,,,,,,,,,.39,LimnoTech,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to update and revise the Twin Cities Metro Area (TCMA) Chloride Management Plan to a Statewide Chloride Management Plan (CMP). The Statewide CMP will provide stakeholders the information and tools necessary to improve and/or maintain water quality with respect to chloride. A second goal of this project is to improve and enhance the Winter Maintenance Assessment tool (WMAt). This planning tool is critical for assisting stakeholders in meeting the water quality goals of the Chloride Management Plan without compromising public safety, and allowing for consideration of the varying resources and conditions for each individual winter maintenance program. The WMAt also allows for assistance with tracking and reporting the progress being made by the users to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will prevent chloride pollution and protect Minnesota’s waters.",,"Road Salt and Water Quality Winter Maintenance Assessment tool ",2016-12-05,2020-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Brooke,Asleson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2205",,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-chloride-management-plan-and-winter-maintenance-assessment-tool-wmat,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2025,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (b) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices, cover crops, and other vegetative cover; assessing adoption of best management practices and other recommended practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2024,3000000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (b) $3,000,000 the first year and $3,000,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices, cover crops, and other vegetative cover; assessing adoption of best management practices and other recommended practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ",,,,,1954307,268461,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2023,2585000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing adoption of best management practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ",,,,,2138119,275555,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2022,2585000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2021, 1st Special Session, CHAPTER 1—Article 2, Section 3","(b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing adoption of best management practices; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ","The Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan was revised and updated in 2015 and the Groundwater Protection Rule went into effect in June 2019. The NFMP and GPR are being implemented to address nitrate from fertilizer in groundwater. Partnerships are established in vulnerable areas in support of groundwater protection: 36 local government units on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities 21 projects (SE Volunteer Network, Central Sands Volunteer Network, 18 Level 2 DWSMAs, RCPP) On average 39% of funds are passed through to local government units and research partners 13 on-farm nitrogen fertilizer BMP evaluation/demonstration sites On average about 98 NMI on-farm plots each year (92 standard plots, 6 advanced N-rate trials) engaging on average 98 famers and 27 crop advisers Regional and Township Testing: Approximately 32,880 private well owners have participated in either a one-time (snapshot) or long-term nitrate testing.                 ~ 650-900 of those private wells are tested annually through the Central Sands Private Well Network and Southeast Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network. 32,217 private wells in vulnerable townships have been tested through MDA’s Township Testing Program (2013-2019) Work completed in 344 vulnerable townships within 50 counties Overall, 9.1% (2,925) of the 32,217 wells tested in vulnerable areas exceeded the drinking water standard for nitrate 143 townships with ≥ 10% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (41%) 68 townships with 5-9 % of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (20%) 133 townships with <5% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (39%)   Groundwater Protection Rule: The MDA has completed a review of the monitoring data received from the Minnesota Department of Health in 2021 and 2022 and determined the following: 8 DWSMAs are designated as Level 1 with nitrate levels at or above 5.4 mg/L but less than 8 mg/L  21 DWSMAs are designated as Level 2 with nitrate levels at or above 8 mg/L  10 DWSMAs need more information before a level determination can be made In 2020, 61 on-farm demonstrations were located within 1 mile of the boundary of or within the Fall Nitrogen Fertilizer Restriction area or Level 2 DWSMAs.  (This includes all NMI trials, RRFSP, Discovery Farms MN, Red River Valley Drainage Water Management, Rosholt, and SE MN BMP programs.)   Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs are revised based on research: U of M nitrogen fertilizer rate studies at two regional locations led to the development of new nitrogen rate guidelines for irrigated corn (""Fertilizing Corn Grown on Irrigated Sandy Soils”) 12 applied research projects evaluate(d) BMPs (6 on-going) Rosholt Farm: 2 ongoing, 1 completed Clean Water Research:  2 ongoing, 5 completed Other research (funded by N in Groundwater): 2 ongoing   Education and outreach programs help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs to farmers and crop advisers: Nutrient management Funding two UM-Extension Educators – Agricultural Water Quality Protection positions Four state-wide conferences reaching over 1,200 attendees (virtual in 2021, both in-person and virtual in 2022) and impacting over 11,675,000 acres (Nitrogen & Nutrient Management) Continuing education credits offered to Certified Crop Advisers Minnesota Irrigators Program: Intensive three-day training program for irrigators and SWCD technical staff on applying nutrient and water BMPs for irrigated crop production.   Weather data and Irrigation management 14 weather stations - Central Minnesota Ag Weather Network (weather info available online in real-time). Stations are now included in the North Dakota Ag Weather Network with greater outreach to irrigators. 17 websites and 2 mobile apps utilize the data from the weather stations 10 counties use weather data as part of an online irrigation scheduling tool in Central Minnesota 17 weather information requests were received from 10 different researchers and technical staff from state agencies and U of M ",,,,2177280,273502,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2021,2585000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. ",,"The Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Plan was revised and updated in 2015 and the Groundwater Protection Rule went into effect in June 2019. The NFMP and GPR are being implemented to address nitrate from fertilizer in groundwater. Partnerships are established in vulnerable areas in support of groundwater protection 36 local government units on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities 21 projects (SE Volunteer Network, Central Sands Volunteer Network, 18 Level 2 DWSMAs, Precision Irrigation Cost-Share) On average 39% of funds are passed through to local government units and research partners 15 on-farm nitrogen fertilizer BMP evaluation sites Regional and Township Testing: Approximately 32,880 private well owners have participated in either a one-time (snapshot) or long-term nitrate testing.                ~ 650-900 of those private wells are tested annually through the Central Sands Private Well Network and Southeast Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network. 32,217 wells private wells in vulnerable townships have been tested through MDA’s Township Testing Program (2013-2019) Work completed in 344 vulnerable townships within 50 counties Overall, 9.1% (2,925) of the 32,217 wells tested in vulnerable areas exceeded the drinking water standard for nitrate 143 townships with ≥ 10% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (41%) 68 townships with 5-9 % of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (20%) 133 townships with <5% of wells over 10 mg/L nitrate (39%) Groundwater Protection Rule: The MDA has completed a review of the monitoring data received from the Minnesota Department of Health in 2021 and 2022 and determined the following: 8 DWSMAs are designated as Level 1 with nitrate levels at or above 5.4 mg/L but less than 8 mg/L  21 DWSMAs are designated as Level 2 with nitrate levels at or above 8 mg/L  10 DWSMAs need more information before a level determination can be made   Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs are revised based on research: U of M nitrogen fertilizer rate studies at two regional locations led to the development of new nitrogen rate guidelines for irrigated corn (""Fertilizing Corn Grown on Irrigated Sandy Soils”) Twelve applied research and on-farm projects evaluation Best Management Practices (BMPs) (6 on-going) Rosholt Farm Evaluating Crop Yield and Water Quality Impacts of Nitrogen Management, Cover Crops and Living Mulches in Irrigated Corn and Soybean (PI Fernandez) (on-going) Optimizing Nitrogen and Water Management under Irrigation and Quantifying Water Quality and Crop Yield Impacts (PI Sharma) (on-going) Evaluation and performance of different irrigation scheduling methods and their impact on corn production and nitrate leaching in central sands region of Minnesota (PI Sharma) (completed)   Clean Water Research Cover crop effectiveness in a series of farm BMPs, 2012-2019 (PI Lenhart) (completed) The Cover Crops, Water, and Nitrogen Nexus: How do they impact corn and soybean production and the environment? (PI Garcia y Garcia) (completed) The Minnesota Cover Crop Guide (PI Cates) (completed) Adjusting corn nitrogen rates using a preplant nitrate test to reduce potential for N loss in South-Central and Southeastern Minnesota (PI Kaiser) (waiting for final report) Improved Design, Performance, and Implementation of Saturated Buffers (PI Sands) (completed, in review) Development of the nitrogen BMP effectiveness tool for groundwater protection in Minnesota under varying soil types and climatic conditions (PI Mulla & Lazarus) (on-going) Recommendations for residual soil nitrogen testing and N rate adjustment (PI Fernandez) (on-going) USGS Age Dating USGS Predictive N Model On-Farm Demonstrations (15) Nutrient Management Initiative – Advanced Plots (MDA/Kaiser) Southeast Minnesota Nitrogen BMP Program (MDA/Jeff Vetsch)               Education and outreach programs help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs to farmers and crop advisers: Nutrient management Funding two UM-Extension Educators – Agricultural Water Quality Protection positions Four state-wide conferences reaching over 1,200 attendees (virtual in 2021, both in-person and virtual in 2022) and impacting over 11,675,000 acres (Nitrogen & Nutrient Management) Continuing education credits offered to Certified Crop Advisers Minnesota Irrigators Program: Intensive three-day training program for irrigators and SWCD technical staff on applying nutrient and water BMPs for irrigated crop production. Weather data and Irrigation management 14 weather stations - Central Minnesota Ag Weather Network (weather info available online in real-time). Stations are now included in the North Dakota Ag Weather Network with greater outreach to irrigators. 17 websites and 2 mobile apps utilize the data from the weather stations 10 counties use weather data as part of an online irrigation scheduling tool in Central Minnesota 17 weather information requests were received from 10 different researchers and technical staff from state agencies and U of M ",,,,1994814,274918,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2020,2585000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2--S.F. No. 3, Article 2","M.L. 2019: (b) $2,585,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities, including research activities at the Rosholt Research Farm; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of local government units in partnership on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities Percentage of funds passed through to local government units and research partners Number of Drinking Water Supply Management Areas that participate in mitigation activities through the Groundwater Protection Rule Education and outreach programs to help promote Nitrogen Fertilizer best management practices to farmers and crop advisers Number of applied research and on-farm projects ","Partnerships 26 local government units partner with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture on nitrate monitoring and reduction activities 50% of Clean Water Funds are passed through to local government units and research partners Groundwater Protection Rule Drinking Water Supply Management Areas (DWSMAs) that participate in mitigation activities  6 DWSMAs are designated as Level 1 with nitrate levels at or above 5.4 mg/L but less than 8 mg/L 17 DWSMAs are designated as Level 2 with nitrate levels at or above 8 mg/L Best Management Practices (BMPs) Four state-wide conferences promoted Nitrogen Fertilizer BMPs to over 575 farmers and crop advisers, impacting 6,200,000 acres 9 applied research and on-farm projects are evaluating BMPs ",,,,1831883,211874,,11,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2019,2086000,"2017 Legislative Session - CONFERENCE COMMITTEE REPORT ON H. F. No. 707 -Legacy Funding - ","M.L. 2017: (b) $2,085,000 the first year and $2,086,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1980124,193507,,10.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2018,2085000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2017, Regular Session, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2017: (b) $2,085,000 the first year and $2,086,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; grants to support agricultural demonstration and implementation activities; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,2484201,224865,,10.4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2017,2585000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (b) $2,586,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; monitoring for pesticides when nitrate is detected; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,3349185,216545,,10.75,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2016,2586000,"M.L. 2015, First Special Session, Chapter 2, Section 3","M.L. 2015: (b) $2,586,000 the first year and $2,585,000 the second year are for monitoring and evaluating trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation; monitoring for pesticides when nitrate is detected; promoting, developing, and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices; assessing best management practice adoption; education and technical support from University of Minnesota Extension; and other actions to protect groundwater from degradation from nitrate. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,2797007,230400,,"13.45 (includes 2.6 FTEs working on pesticide sampling in private wells)","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2015,2500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013:(b) $2,500,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrates in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation, including a substantial increase of monitoring of private wells in cooperation with the commissioner of health, monitoring for pesticides when nitrates are detected, and promoting and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices to protect groundwater from degradation. Of this amount, $75,000 may be used for accelerating the update for the commercial manure applicator manual. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1773017,153876,,8.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2014,2500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2013:(b) $2,500,000 the first year and $2,500,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrates in groundwater in areas vulnerable to groundwater degradation, including a substantial increase of monitoring of private wells in cooperation with the commissioner of health, monitoring for pesticides when nitrates are detected, and promoting and evaluating regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices to protect groundwater from degradation. Of this amount, $75,000 may be used for accelerating the update for the commercial manure applicator manual.   ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,734113,66278,,8.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2013,850000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L.2011: (b) $850, 000 the first year and $850,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in high-risk areas and regionally and to promote and evaluate regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,586942,12000,,4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2012,850000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec. 3","M.L.2011: (b) $850,000 the first year and $850,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in high-risk areas and regionally and to promote and evaluate regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to individual project pages. See ""related projects"". ","Please refer to individual project pages. See ""related projects"". ",,,,567100,12000,,4,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9516,"Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection",2010,375000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (c) $375,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are to increase groundwater and drinking water protection from agricultural chemicals, primarily nutrients. M.L.2011: (b) $850, 000 the first year and $850,000 the second year are to increase monitoring and evaluate trends in the concentration of nitrate in groundwater in high-risk areas and regionally and to promote and evaluate regional and crop-specific nutrient best management practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,488043,10540,,"0.2 FTE (2010), 3.2 FTEs (2011)","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","Nitrate-nitrogen (nitrate) is one of the contaminants of greatest concern for groundwater in Minnesota. This funding is being used for activities that help identify the severity and magnitude of nitrate contamination and implement practices at the local level to reduce nitrate in groundwater. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) is working with many local partners and passing funding through to local government units (counties, cities, soil and water conservation districts) to address this concern. The MDA works with local partners to assess groundwater in agricultural areas and works directly with local farmers and agri-business to improve water quality in areas where groundwater quality is adversely impacted. The MDA also works with University researchers to develop, promote and provide education on Nitrogen Fertilizer Best Management Practices (BMPs). Funding will be used for a variety of projects related to groundwater and drinking water protection, including: Responding to areas with elevated nitrate in groundwater Private well monitoring networks (regional assessments) and accelerated private well nitrate testing in sensitive townships Demonstration sites validating nitrogen recommendations (timing, rate, source) and water quality impacts under irrigated agriculture Irrigation and nitrogen management workshops Installation of regional weather stations to help farmers implement irrigation management Nutrient management surveys to evaluate on-farm adoption of BMPs   ","The MDA works on a statewide effort to better understand nitrogen fertilizer use and to promote proper nitrogen management. This page includes examples of these efforts. ","The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Groundwater and Drinking Water Protection. Township Testing Program Central Sands Private Well Network Southeast Minnesota Volunteer Nitrate Monitoring Network Ag Weather & Irrigation Management Resources, (Minnesota Ag Weather Network) Water Quality and Irrigation Research at Rosholt Farm ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Larry,Gunderson,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55155,"651-201- 6168",Larry.Gunderson@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-groundwater-and-drinking-water-protection,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2025,1500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance; research, demonstration, and promotion projects on properly implementing best management practices and vegetative cover; and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ",,,,,,,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2024,1500000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2023, Regular Session, CHAPTER 40—Article 2, Section 3","M.L. 2023: (d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance; research, demonstration, and promotion projects on properly implementing best management practices and vegetative cover; and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2028. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ",,,,,1355261,198301,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2023,1500000,"M.L. 2021, 1st Special Session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 3","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on properly implementing best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ",,,,,1341682,188182,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2022,1500000,"M.L. 2021, 1st Special Session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 3","M.L. 2021: (d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on properly implementing best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2026. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ","Technical assistance activities are a primary vehicle to work with the agricultural community to promote best management practices. As of October 2022, the MDA has cumulatively engaged >18,000 ag producers, crop advisors and Local Government Units at >450 education and outreach events. Implemented 677 Nutrient Management Initiative field trials in 2015-2021 Worked with an average of 98 farmers and 27 crop advisers each year on nutrient management trials The MDA maintains 20 active edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations around the state. Edge of Field data has been used for a variety of computer simulation and model calibrations including PTMApp, Adapt-N, SWAT, and the Runoff Risk Advisory Tool. Data are used to support the State’s Watershed Approach and referenced in numerous WRAPs reports. Data from Discovery Farms Minnesota, the Root River Field to Stream Partnership, the Clay County Drainage Site and Red River Valley Drainage Water Management have all been shared with local, state and national partners. Data has been used in peer-reviewed journal articles, large meta-analysis and to engage local farmers and discuss the effectiveness of conservation practices. The Root River Field to Stream Partnership (RRFSP) has helped identify critical areas and worked with farmers to implement conservation practices. This project has helped install and support: Over 105,000 feet of grassed waterways 15 new water and sediment control basins and catchment ponds Rehabilitation of an outdated flood control structure Planting of 370 acres of cover crops Feedlot improvements include an increase in manure storage to reduce manure applications on frozen soil, moving milk house wastewater systems, and abandonment of a feedlot in a high-risk location The highest runoff risk field in one of the study areas (80 acres) was enrolled into the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). An additional 50 acres was enrolled in other areas. Over 50% of the highest priority conservation practices were addressed by the end of 2017, about 70% addressed as of end of 2022. $1.8 million in state and federal conservation funds were distributed across three watersheds over a five-year period (60% on vegetative & structural practices, 40% on feedlot & manure waste improvements) In the glacial till headwaters watershed, 64% of the High Risk Area has been treated (after 2021), prior to 2018 only 8% of the High Risk Area had been treated. The RRFSP has leveraged Clean Water Fund dollars with over $5 million in private, state, and federal dollars to support conservation efforts. If CWF dollars from other agencies is excluded, over $3.5 million has been leveraged.                                                                                                                                                                               The Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project (RRV DWM) is evaluating drainage water management on operating farms as a practice to mitigate flooding and add water quality and quantity benefits. The project has shown that:  Controlled drainage is a viable option in the lake bottom landscape of the Red River Basin During 2017-2020, controlled drainage reduced nitrate-N losses by 22% and reduced drainage volume by over 13% compared to conventional subsurface drainage During 2018-2020, a saturated buffer had capacity to treat 92% of the drainage water from an 11-acre research field and removed over 76% of the nitrate in the drainage water (including water through the bypass) Since 2015, nearly 3,500 people have been engaged in RRV DWM outreach presentations, and field days/events. (Overall: 49 presentations, 19 field days/events, 4 poster displays, 2 trade journal articles, 3 publications/reports, 2 data requests) The RRV DWM has leveraged Clean Water Fund dollars with over $1 million in private, Local Government Unit and federal dollars to support drainage research and outreach. Project is a partner site for the USDA-funded $5M Transforming Drainage project. ",,,,1106429,158252,,,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2021,1500000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2--S.F. No. 3, Art. 2","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,947074,155671,,5.34,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2020,1500000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2--S.F. No. 3, Art. 2","d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more-precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2024. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota Total dollars leveraged ","Edge-of-field monitoring 26 active edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational in 2020 Overall there have been 71 edge-of-field stations throughout the life of the program, some projects have ended. Data has been used for a variety of computer simulation and model calibrations including PTMApp, Adapt-N, SWAT, and the Runoff Risk Advisory Tool. It has been used in peer-reviewed journal articles and large meta-analysis. Data continues to be shared with local, state, and national partners, and local farmers to discuss the effectiveness of conservation practices, and continues to be used to support the State’s Watershed Approach. The data is referenced in numerous WRAPs reports. Outreach From 2015-2020, about 15,000 ag producers, crop advisers and Local Government Units participated in 327 education and outreach events. Funds leveraged From 2015-2020 about $6.5 million has been leveraged from edge-of-field sites to support conservation efforts For additional measures please refer to individual project pages. See ""related projects"". ","achieved proposed outcomes",,,1127427,159158,,6.9,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2019,1125000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1115022,135259,,7.0,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2018,1125000,"M.L. 2017, Chapter 91, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters and for grants to support on-farm demonstration of agricultural practices. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2022. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1116970,188976,,7.0,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2017,1125000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1261327,151885,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2016,1125000,"Minnesota Session Laws - 2015, 1st Special Session, Chapter 2, Article 2, Section 3","(d) $1,125,000 the first year and $1,125,000 the second year are for technical assistance, research, and demonstration projects on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2020. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,1320290,149902,,6.8,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2015,1500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 2","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. "," Number of edge-of-field water quality monitoring stations installed and operational Number of research or science groups that request and use data generated at research and demonstration sites (either to validate models, reference in TMDL studies or promote the adoption of conservation practices) Number of field days, presentation and other educational events hosted each year and the number of contacts with farmers, crop advisors and co-op dealers Number of local and regional partnerships in support of protecting and restoring surface water in Minnesota   ","The MDA conducts on-farm demonstrations and evaluations to provide accurate data on water quality effects of specific practices and help farmers understand and adopt best management practices (BMPs). On-farm work is conducted at 17 sites using 37 automated monitoring stations. The MDA works closely with 20 local government partners across the state. To date, over 50 field days, tours and educational events have been held to share results with interested farmers, conservation professionals and other stakeholders. The number of data requests for information from edge-of-field monitoring sites continues to increase. For example, the National Weather Service has requested edge-of-field data to validate / calibrate their Runoff Risk Advisory Service. Specifically, they are interested to know if runoff is actually occurring at times when their predictive model suggests the likelihood is high. Other data requests have come from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota Agricultural Water Quality Certification Program, Water Resources Center (U of M) and others.   ",,,,1049412,132877,,6.85,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2014,1500000,"M.L. 2013, Chapter 137, Article 2, Sec. 2","(d) $1,500,000 the first year and $1,500,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2018. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,706285,94509,,8.5,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2013,775000,"M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,272755,12945,,5.85,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2012,775000," M.L. 2011, Chapter 6, Article 2, Sec.3","M.L. 2011:(d) $775,000 the first year and $775,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance on proper implementation of best management practices and more precise information on nonpoint contributions to impaired waters. This appropriation is available until June 30, 2016. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,268985,10515,,5.2,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 9523,"Statewide Technical Assistance",2010,695000,"M.L. 2009, Chapter 172, Article 2, Sec. 2 ","M.L. 2009: (d) $695,000 the first year and $1,570,000 the second year are for research, pilot projects, and technical assistance related to ways agricultural practices contribute to restoring impaired waters and assist with the development of TMDL plans. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ","Please refer to the most recent fiscal year. ",,,,706285,94509,,"1 FTE (2010), 3.95 FTE (2011)","Minnesota Department of Agriculture","State Government","The MDA's technical assistance helps ensure that current and accurate scientific information is made available and used to address water quality concerns in agricultural areas of Minnesota. This funding has been used to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices, share information from research and demonstration sites and enhance outreach and education to the agricultural community and local government partners. The MDA technical assistance staff support the Impaired Waters Process in Minnesota. Staff attend meetings and provide input for Watershed Protection and Restoration Strategies (WRAPS) and other planning documents. The MDA provides advice about the implementation of best management practices and supports on-farm evaluations. The MDA is also represented on multiple interagency teams to ensure consistency and coordination on research and demonstrations across state agencies. Through outreach efforts, the MDA ensures that agricultural issues are represented during scientific discussions that focus on water quality. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Agricultural BMPs: In many areas of the state, the MDA uses on-farm evaluations to help farmers compare different management practices and use the results to update knowledge and inform future management decisions. The MDA uses on-farm, edge-of-field monitoring to assess sediment and nutrient loss at the field scale and to evaluate the effectiveness of conservation practices. The MDA works with many partners including universities, crop consultants, soil and water districts, farmers, and other state agencies. Technology Transfer: The MDA works with many partners to share information about research and emerging technologies. The MDA provides in-field technical assistance, project coordination and technical advice. The MDA convenes technical advisory committees to share information about projects and gather input from subject matter experts. The MDA also meets regularly and provides technical advice to project partners including commodity groups, local SWCDs, non-profits and other state agencies. The MDA works directly with farmers and local government units to disseminate information and to ensure that scientific information gets in the hands of the end user. Outreach and Education: The MDA works with many partners to ensure that Clean Water Fund information is accurate and easily accessible. Brochures, fact sheets, videos, web pages, field days, presentations and meetings are used to deliver information to individuals and organizations. The MDA works with a diverse group of stakeholders including farmers, legislators, state agencies, local governments, academics, non-profits, environmental groups and community based groups. The MDA's communication efforts support local partnerships and foster greater cooperation.   ",,"The following activities and programs are included under Statewide Technical Assistance.  Nutrient Management Initiative Root River Field to Stream Partnership Clay County Drainage Demonstration Site (completed) Discovery Farms Minnesota Red River Valley Drainage Water Management Project Promoting precision conservation to local governments   ",2009-07-01,2028-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Margaret,Wagner,"Minnesota Department of Agriculture","625 Robert Street North","St. Paul ",Minnesota,55155,"(651) 201-6488",Margaret.Wagner@state.mn.us,"Demonstration/Pilot Project, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Agriculture",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/statewide-technical-assistance,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2025,2550000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(a)","$2,550,000 the first year and $2,550,000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring. ","In FY25 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 35 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,100 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will contract with the USGS to collect stream flow measurements at 30 sites.  Plans also include continued website upgrades to update all hydrologic websites to have the same look and ability to download multiple types of data for more than 5 stations at a time. ",,,,,,,,,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2024,2550000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(a)","$2,550,000 the first year and $2,550,000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring. ","In FY24 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 20 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,160 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will contract with the USGS to collect stream flow measurements at 30 sites.  Plans also include website upgrades to provide additional flow and water quality information and functionality of data downloads at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY24 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at 18 locations. We collected almost 1,100 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected stream flow measurements at 30 sites. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state and continuous water quality data collected by MPCA are now available on our Cooperative Stream Gaging website. ",,,,2094641,359526,,14.6,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2023,2000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring ","In FY23 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading three gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,150 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will contract with the USGS to collect stream flow measurements at 30 sites.  Plans also include website upgrades to provide additional flow and water quality information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY23 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at five locations. We collected almost 1,190 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected stream flow measurements at 30 sites. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state. ",,,,1762341,301473,,14.8,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2022,2000000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for streamflow monitoring ","In FY22 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading four gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1,300 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. Plans also include website upgrades to provide additional flow and water quality information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY22 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at four locations. We collected almost 1,180 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected stream flow measurements at 30 sites. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state. ",,,,1704137,237200,,13.95,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2021,2000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring. ","In FY21 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 4 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1100 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will continue contracting with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to develop regional bedload and suspended-sediment datasets from the sediment samples taken at 50 sites between 2007-2020. Plans also include website upgrades to provide higher-resolution flow information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY21 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at three locations. We collected 1140 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS finished their bedload sediment transport project and wrote the final report. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state including adding additional map layers such as the US Drought Monitor and additional parameters such as water quality collected by our partners at MPCA. ",,,,1777467,224390,,15.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2020,2000000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring. ","In FY20 the DNR will maintain the stream monitoring network by upgrading 12 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1300 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will continue contracting with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to collect up to 30 sediment samples at the 50 sites sampled between 2007-2019 to fill gaps needed to assess bedload sediment transport. Plans also include website upgrades to provide higher-resolution flow information at the existing stream gages across the state. ","In FY20 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading equipment at 8 locations. We collected 1257 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected sediment at 30 sites to assess bedload sediment transport. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state. ",,,,1734450,242562,,15.4,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2019,1950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1950000 the first year and $1950000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY19 the DNR will expand the stream monitoring network with one additional gage and upgrade 10 gages with new equipment. We will collect approximately 1 300 stream flow measurements and compile over 80 records at continuous gage sites. We will continue contracting with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) to collect sediment in seven streams to assess bedload sediment transport. Plans also include website upgrades to provide higher-resolution flow information at the existing stream gages across the state.","In FY19 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by adding 1 additional gage and upgrading equipment at 16 locations. We collected 1 349 stream flow measurements and compiled records for approximately 80 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected sediment in 7 streams to assess bedload sediment transport. We continued work to upgrade the website that provides stream flow information for gages across the state.",,,,1665825,221621,,15.5,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2018,1950000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1950000 the first year and $1950000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY18 the DNR will upgrade the stream monitoring network by adding new equipment to three gages. We will collect approximately 1 300 stream flow measurements and compile over 200 records at continuous stream gage sites for use in watershed assessments throughout the state. We will continue to contract with the US Geological Survey (USGS) to collect sediment in 11 streams to assess bedload sediment transport. Finally as part of an overall upgrade to our cooperative data system we will continue to transition to a new more efficient database to house all of our stream flow and groundwater data.","In FY18 the DNR improved the stream monitoring network by upgrading nine existing locations. We collected 1 511 stream flow measurements and compiled records for 60 continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. The transition to a new more efficient database in FY18 resulted in fewer records compiled than the previous year. The transition is complete and the new cooperative data system holds all of our stream flow and groundwater data. Under contract with the DNR the USGS collected sediment in 11 streams to assess bedload sediment transport.",,,,1875551,221437,,15.7,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2017,2000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","(a) $2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY17 the DNR will expand the stream monitoring network by adding five new gages. We will collect approximately 1 335 stream flow measurements and compile over 200 records at continuous stream gage sites for use in watershed assessments throughout the state. We will continue to contract with the US Geological Survey (USGS) to collect sediment in streams to assess bedload sediment transport. As part of an overall upgrade to our cooperative data system we will transition to a new more efficient database to house all of our stream flow and groundwater data.","In FY17 the DNR expanded the stream monitoring network with one additional stream gages and upgraded nine existing locations. We collected 1 345 stream flow measurements and compiled approximately 200 records at continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the US Geological Survey (USGS) collected sediment in streams at 11 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.",,,,1842779,183087,,16.1,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2016,2000000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","(a) $2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring.","In FY16 the DNR will continue to expand the stream monitoring network by adding 11 new gages. We will collect 1300 stream flow measurements and compile 180 records for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. We will also contract with the USGS to collect sediment in streams at 10 sites to assess bedload sediment transport. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website will be upgraded to provide more features and easier access including a mobile platform and additional data.","In FY16 the DNR expanded the stream monitoring network with five additional stream gages and upgraded six existing locations. We collected 1 255 stream flow measurements and compiled 220 records at continuous stream gage sites to aid watershed assessments throughout the state. Under contract with the DNR the US Geological Survey (USGS) collected sediment in streams at 11 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.",,,,1706951,184191,,16.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2015,2000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring including the installation of additional monitoring gauges and monitoring necessary to determine the relationship between stream flow and groundwater. ","In FY15 the DNR will continue to expand the stream monitoring network by adding 30 new gages. Scientists will collect 950 stream flow measurements and compile 180 records for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. The DNR will also contract with the USGS to collect sediment in streams at 13 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.","In FY15 DNR scientists installed or upgraded 22 new gages as part of ongoing work to establish and maintain a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. Many of these sites now have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. We installed fewer gages than proposed because of difficulty accessing some sites because fewer new gages are needed in some watersheds. We collected 1 173 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages that are used in in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. We compiled 116 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR-operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. We compiled fewer records than proposed because we had fewer trained staff to do the work. New staff are now trained are working on reviewing and compiling the backlogged records. This work is done in cooperation with MPCA; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for identifying impaired waters. We also contracted with the USGS to collect 258 samples of sediment in streams from 13 sites to assess bedload and suspended sediment transport and we provided hydrologic analyses of historical data and modeling for seven watersheds. This information helps evaluate surface water and ground water quantities over time.",,,,2072048,192587,,13.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2014,2000000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$2000000 the first year and $2000000 the second year are for stream flow monitoring including the installation of additional monitoring gauges and monitoring necessary to determine the relationship between stream flow and groundwater. ","In FY14 DNR will continue to expand the stream monitoring network by adding 30 new gages. Scientists will collect 1 000 stream flow measurements and compile 130 records for continuous real-time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. DNR will also contract with the USGS to collect sediment in streams at 20 sites to assess bedload sediment transport.","In FY14 DNR scientists installed or upgraded 36 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. Many of these sites now have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. Scientists collected 853 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. Staff compiled 163 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR-operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. DNR also contracted with the USGS to collect 126 samples of sediment in streams to assess bedload sediment transport. Staff also provided hydrologic analyses of historical data for three major watersheds. This information aids in evaluating surface water and ground water quantities through time and the potential causes for these changes. This work is done in cooperation with MPCA; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for identifying impaired waters.",,,,1738591,148338,,13.2,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2013,1825000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1825000 the first year and $1825000 the second year are for the continuation and expansion of stream flow monitoring.","In FY13 DNR will continue to grow the stream monitoring network by adding 20 new gages. Scientists will collect 1080 stream flow measurements and compile 150 records for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds.","In FY13 DNR scientists installed or upgraded 19 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. All of these sites now have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. Field staff collected 710 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. Hydrologists compiled 116 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. DNR also contracted with the USGS to collect 127 samples of sediment in streams to assess bedload sediment transport. The number of records and samples is significantly smaller than proposed because of a drought that caused low or zero flow conditions. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters.",,,,1407259,172634,,8.0,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2012,1825000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(a)","$1825000 the first year and $1825000 the second year are for the continuation and expansion of stream flow monitoring.","In FY12 DNR will continue to grow the stream monitoring network by adding 22 new gages. An additional 330 stream flow measurements will be collected 30 records will be compiled for continuous real time gage sites for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters. DNR will also coordinate with MPCA’s lake monitoring to install lake level gages on priority lakes and continue to ensure stream gage and flow measurement data are available for critical flood forecasting if needed.","In FY12 DNR scientists installed 8 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network that takes automated continuous measurements at sites across the state. Some of these sites have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. Field staff collected 919 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds and compiled 131 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds.",,,,973186,263700,,6.0,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2011,865000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","* Maintain existing network of 65 stream gages used for TMDL studies * Install calibrate stream 11 new streamflow gages with satellite telemetry for real time data access * Hydrology/hydraulic analysis of lake outlets at 10 lakes to support TMDL work * Develop interagency Monitoring Plan for surface and groundwater","In FY11 DNR scientists installed 2 new gages to continue establishing and maintaining a stream gage network to allow automated continuous measurements to be taken at sites across the state. Some of these sites have telemetry equipment to access real-time data remotely. This is in addition to the 4 new gages and 4 upgraded gages installed in FY10. Field staff collected 334 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds and compiled 30 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. In FY10 field staff collected 323 stream flow measurements and compiled 28 annual daily flow quantity records. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters.",,,,,,,,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 3623,"Stream Flow Monitoring",2010,645000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.",,"In FY 10 DNR scientists installed 4 new gages and upgraded 4 gages in a stream gage network to allow automated continuous measurements to be taken across the state. Field staff collected 323 stream flow measurements to calibrate stream gages for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds and compiled 28 annual daily flow quantity records for DNR - operated permanent gage locations for use in statewide assessment of Minnesota's major watersheds. This work is done in cooperation with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; stream flow data are used to determine pollutant loading for establishment of impaired waters.",,,,,,,,,,"Stream flow information is essential for understanding the state of Minnesota's waters. Clean water funding has allowed the DNR to expand a network of stream gages that support planning and implementation for clean water protection and restoration. These gages are also used as part of the interagency Flood Forecasting/Warning System. This expanded stream gaging network has also significantly increased the real time data available to recreational water enthusiasts via the internet. Funds are used to install/upgrade and calibrate stream gages and to collect, compile, analyze and distribute data collected at gage stations. The Cooperative Stream Gaging Website provides a portal for agencies and the public to see stream flow data, site photos, water quality information and links to other information. In addition, a Monthly Hydrologic Conditions Report provides general trend information on water resources using climatic data, lake and river gages, and groundwater monitoring information. The stream flow information collected from these gage stations is used by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and local watershed organizations to determine the health of a water resource. Specifically, stream flow data are needed to calculate pollution loads for Total Maximum Daily Load studies and pollution reduction plans. They are also used to evaluate trends in base flow conditions, determine the frequency and magnitude of floods and low flows, assist in assessing changes in land use and watershed conditions and the potential effects of climate change. Through the Legacy Amendment the DNR will continue to maintain at least one stream gage each of the 81 major watersheds to provide water quantity information in support of the State's long term water quality trend monitoring efforts. ","Water constantly moves among air, lakes, streams, soil, and aquifers. Natural and human alterations of this cycle can result in problems such as rapid runoff, high lake levels, altered subsurface water levels, and changes in water supply. A quality hydrologic monitoring network informs decision-making that fosters a healthy economy, environment, and communities. More accurate and timely data improve flood warning and response, water supply management, clean water, and many other decisions that affect quality of life in Minnesota. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Joy,Loughry,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","325 Randolph Ave, Suite 500","Saint Paul",MN,55102,"(651) 539-2109",joy.loughry@state.mn.us,"Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Monitoring","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/stream-flow-monitoring,,,, 37685,"Upper Mississippi River Basin Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) Revision 2017 ",2017,134960,,,,,,,,,,,0.34,"Tetra Tech Inc","For-Profit Business/Entity","The primary goal of this project is to examine the calibration and validation of recently extended Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) watershed models for the Mississippi River-Headwaters, Mississippi River-Grand Rapids, Mississippi River-Brainerd, Mississippi River-Sartell, Mississippi River-St. Cloud, Leech Lake, Pine River, Crow Wing River, Long Prairie River, and Redeye River watersheds and revise the calibration. ",,"Crow Wing River Watershed Leech Lake River Watershed Long Prairie River Watershed Mississippi River - Brainerd Watershed Mississippi River - Grand Rapids Watershed Mississippi River - Headwaters Watershed Mississippi River - Sartell Watershed Mississippi River - St. Cloud Watershed Pine River Watershed Redeye River Watershed ",2017-06-05,2019-06-28,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,"55155 ","(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,"Aitkin, Becker, Beltrami, Benton, Carlton, Cass, Clearwater, Crow Wing, Douglas, Hubbard, Itasca, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Otter Tail, Pine, Sherburne, St. Louis, Stearns, Todd, Wadena",,"Crow Wing River, Leech Lake River, Long Prairie River, Mississippi River - Brainerd, Mississippi River - Grand Rapids, Mississippi River - Headwaters, Mississippi River - Sartell, Mississippi River - St. Cloud, Pine River, Redeye River",http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/upper-mississippi-river-basin-hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf-revision-2017,,,, 37648,"Water Quality Parameter Calibration Guidance for Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF)",2017,99992,,,,,,,,,,,0.31,RESPEC,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to develop guidance for water quality parameter evaluation and calibration for Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) applications focused on dissolved oxygen (D.O.), nutrient, and algal simulation, along with a demonstration of the guidance by step-by-step application to D.O.-impaired Minnesota watersheds. ",,,2017-02-17,2017-10-31,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Chuck,Regan,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency","520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2866",,Modeling,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-quality-parameter-calibration-guidance-hydrological-simulation-program-fortran-hspf,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2024,1125000,"M.L. 2023, Chapter 40, Art. 2, Sec. 8, Subd. (a) These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2024: M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Updated Groundwater Modeling for Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Pilot Project, $112,265 spent in FY2024 (Barr) Phase 2: A Community-Centered Framework of the Value of Water in the Twin Cities, $21,204 spent in FY2024 (University of Minnesota - Water Resources Center) Projects continuing this year: Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $105,960 spent in FY2024 (Minnesota Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $126,248 spent in FY2024 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Water Supply Planning Atlas for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Development (Metropolitan Council) ",,,,593505,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff",0.6,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2023,919000,"M.L. 2021 1st Special session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec 2. Subd. 2 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2023: M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9 M.L. 2017, Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Water Supply Planning Atlas for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Outreach and Engagement, $27,481 spent in FY2023 (EOR) White Paper: Water Availability, Access, and Use, $25,552 spent in FY2023 (EOR) Subregional Engagement to Update the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Projects continuing this year: Water Supply Planning Atlas for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Development (Metropolitan Council) Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $116,460 spent in FY2023  (Minnesota Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $126,248 spent in FY2023  (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Water Supply Planning Atlas for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Outreach and Engagement, $27,481 spent in FY2023 (EOR) Phase 1: A Community-Centered Framework of the Value of Water in the Twin Cities, $13,680 spent in FY2023 (U of MN - Water Resources Center) ",,,,650661,,"Barber, Cameron, Carter, Cederberg, Chamblis, Cummings, Dolkar, Johnson, Lee, Lilligren, Lindstrom, Morales, Osman, Pacheco, Vento, Wulff, Zelle, Zeran",2.5,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2022,919000,"M.L. 2021 1st Special session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec 2. Subd. 2 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2022: M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9 M.L. 2017 Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Water Supply Planning Atlas for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Development (Metropolitan Council) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan, $562 spent in FY2022 (HDR and Metropolitan Council) Water Conservation Advisor Training Program, $27,000 spent in FY2022 (Freshwater Society) Interactions of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources, $14,736 spent in FY2022 (HDR) Phase 1: A Community-Centered Framework of the Value of Water in the Twin Cities, $13,680 spent in FY2022 (U of MN - Water Resources Center) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $106,350 spent in FY2022 (Minnesota Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $166,029 spent in FY2022 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) ",,,"Met Council contributed an additional $31,869 to expand work ",846839,,,3.3,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2021,1000000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2021: M.L. 2017 Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Phase 1: A Community-Centered Framework of the Value of Water in the Twin Cities, $27,360 spent in FY2021 (U of MN - Water Resources Center) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan, $7,996 spent in FY2021 (HDR and Metropolitan Council) Water Conservation Advisor Training Program, $27,000 spent in FY2021 (Freshwater Society) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $110,925 spent in FY2021 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $134,467 spent in FY2021 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Twin Cities Metro Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model Application - Climate Scenarios, $46,269 spent in FY2021 (Barr) Municipal Water Supply Data Reporting in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Background and Discovery, $8,305 spent in FY2021 (CDM Smith) Interactions of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources, $5,164 spent in FY2021 (HDR) ",,,,1024547,,,4,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2020,1000000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2020: M.L. 2017 Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Twin Cities Metro Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model Application - Climate Scenarios, $941 spent in FY2020 (Barr) Drinking Water Protection Guidance Project - Phase 1, $54,752 spent in FY2020 (Stantec) - completed in FY2020 Northwest Metro Area Regional Water Supply System Study - Phase 1, $9,402 spent in FY2020 (SEH) - completed in FY2020 Municipal Water Supply Data Reporting in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area - Background and Discovery, $40,235 spent in FY2020 (CDM Smith) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Interactions of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources, $17,959 spent in FY2020 (HDR) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $92,475 spent in FY2020 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $74,880 spent in FY2020 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Water Conservation and Efficiency Assessment Tool, $5,578 spent in FY2020 (HDR) ",,181000,"Metropolitan Council contributed $181,000 to continue work identified in Phase 1 of the Northwest Metro Area Regional Water Supply System Study. ",711740,,,2.8,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2019,950000,"M.L. 2017 Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2019: M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Water Conservation Advisor Training Program - Development and Pilot, $111,500 spent in FY2019 (Freshwater Society) - completed in FY2019 Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $93,050 spent in FY2019 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $99,840 spent in FY2019 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Water Conservation and Efficiency Assessment Tool, $4,864 spent in FY2019 (HDR) Interactions of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources, $104,845 spent in FY2019 (HDR) Projects completed this year: Water Efficiency Impacts on Future Water Supply Infrastructure, $23,215 spent in FY2019 (CDM Smith) ",,,,844272,,,3,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2018,950000,"M.L. 2017 Chp. 91., Art. 2, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2018: M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2014 Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 5 M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Twin Cities Metro Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model Application - Transient Model Update, $26,377 (Barr) - completed in FY2018 Washington County Municipal Water Coalition Water Efficiency Study, $22,099 spent in FY2018 (SEH) - completed in FY2018 Water Conservation and Efficiency Assessment Tool, $23,726 spent in FY2018 (HDR) Water Efficiency Impacts on Future Water Supply Infrastructure, $58,403 spent in FY2018 (CDM Smith) Interactions of Groundwater and Surface Water Resources, $17,677 spent in FY2018 (HDR) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $83,700 spent in FY2018 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $55,608 spent in FY2018 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Stakeholder Engagement in the North and East Metro, $29,957 spent in FY2018 (Grassroots Solutions) ",,,,635627,,,2.8,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2017,975000,"M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2017: M.L. 2014 Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 5 M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2011 (Special Session) Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Water Rates Database and Tool Development, $113,014 (CDM Smith) - completed in FY2017 Stakeholder Engagement in the North and East Metro, $7,543 spent in FY2017 (Grassroots Solutions) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $103,500 spent in FY2017 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $61,296 spent in FY2017 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects completed this year: Characterizing Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction in Northeast Metro Area Lakes, MN, $2,698+$29,427 spent in FY2017 (U.S. Geological Survey, Barr) Washington County Feasibility Assessment, $23,414 spent in FY2017 (SEH) Regional Feasibility of Alternative Approaches to Water Sustainability, $54,784 spent in FY2017 (HDR) ",,,,627657,,,2,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2016,975000,"M.L. 2015 Chp. 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2016: M.L. 2014 Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 5 M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Report to Minnesota State Legislature: Concept Cost Report for Augmentation of White Bear Lake with Surface Water, $123,797 spent in FY2016 (SEH, HDR, Wenck Associates Inc., and Zan Associates) - completed in FY2016 Reducing Water Use on Twin Cities Lawns through Assessment, Research, and Demonstration, $30,648 spent in FY2016 (U of MN - Turfgrass Science Program) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Washington County Feasibility Assessment, $99,767 spent in FY2016 (SEH) Characterizing Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction in Northeast Metro Area Lakes, MN, $247,604 spent in FY2016 (U.S. Geological Survey) Regional Feasibility of Alternative Approaches to Water Sustainability, $95,060 spent in FY2016 (HDR) Projects completed this year: Feasibility Study of Joint Water Utility Cities of Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbus, Hugo, Lexington and Lino Lakes, $11,831 spent in FY2016 (Barr) Regional Groundwater Modeling: Metro Pumping Optimization, $1,905 spent in FY2016 (Barr) Stormwater Reuse Demonstration Project - CHS Stadium, $100,000 spent in FY2016 (City of St. Paul) Water Billing and Rates Analysis, $4,990 spent in FY2016 (CDM Smith) Industrial Water Conservation in the North and East Groundwater Management Area, $16,870 spent in FY2016 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) ",,,,979281,,,1.8,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2015,550000,"M.L. 2014 Chp. 312, Art. 14, Sec. 5 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2015: M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 M.L. 2011 (Special Session) Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Washington County Feasibility Assessment, $21,932 spent in FY2015 (SEH) Characterizing Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction in Northeast Metro Area Lakes, MN., $252,970 spent in FY2015 (U.S. Geological Survey) Stormwater Reuse Demonstration Project - CHS Stadium, $92,629 spent in FY2015 (Pioneer Power Inc., Barr) Regional Groundwater Modeling: Metro Pumping Optimization, $47,487 spent in FY2015 (Barr) Industrial Water Conservation in the North and East Groundwater Management Area, $33,130 spent in FY2015 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Industrial Water Conservation with a MnTAP Intern, $15,650 spent in FY2015 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Water Billing and Rates Analysis, $50,005 spent in FY2015 (CDM Smith) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) Feasibility Study of Joint Water Utility Cities of Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbus, Hugo, Lexington and Lino Lakes, $44,493 spent in FY2015 (Barr) Regional Feasibility of Alternative Approaches to Water Sustainability, $403,182 spent in FY2015 (HDR) Projects completed this year: Feasibility Assessment of Approaches to Water Sustainability in the Northeast Metro, $193,803 spent in FY2015 (SEH) Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model (Metro Model 2), $5,662 spent in FY2015 (Barr) Water Conservation Toolbox, $42,006 spent in FY2015 (CDM Smith) ",,,,1575818,,,2.7,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2014,1537000,"M.L. 2013 Chp. 137, Art. 2, Sec. 9 These appropriations have also supported the projects done in FY2014: M.L. 2011 (Special Session) Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 9 M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Feasibility Study of Joint Water Utility Cities of Centerville, Circle Pines, Columbus, Hugo, Lexington and Lino Lakes, $5,429 spent in FY2014 (Barr) Regional Feasibility of Alternative Approaches to Water Sustainability, $23,304 spent in FY2014 (HDR) Water Conservation Toolbox, $54,694 spent in FY2014 (CDM Smith) Feasibility Assessment of Approaches to Water Sustainability in the Northeast Metro, $34,544+$110,459 spent in FY2014 (SEH) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model (Metro Model 2), $66,495 spent in FY2014 (Barr) Projects completed this year: Assessing the Opportunity and Barriers for Water Conservation by Private Industrial Users, $45,337 spent in FY2014 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Final report on Met Council website Impacts on Groundwater Quality by Stormwater Practices, $66,562 spent in FY2014 (U of MN - St. Anthony Falls Laboratory) ",,,,704466,,,2.8,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2013,500000,"M.L. 2011 (Special Session) Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 9",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Impacts on Groundwater Quality by Stormwater Practices, $66,562 spent in FY2013 (U of MN - St. Anthony Falls Laboratory) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) Assessing the Opportunity and Barriers for Water Conservation by Private Industrial Users, $36,453 spent in SFY2013 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model (Metro Model 2), $135,416 spent in FY2013 (Barr) Projects completed this year: Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Recharge Model, $73,308 spent in FY2013 (Barr) ",,,,491312,,,1.7,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2012,500000,"M.L. 2011 (Special Session) Chp. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 9 This appropriation has also supported the projects done in FY2012: M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Assessing the Opportunity and Barriers for Water Conservation by Private Industrial Users, $11,243 spent in FY2012 (U of MN - MN Technical Assistance Program) Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Groundwater Flow Model (Metro Model 2), $20,789 spent in FY2012 (Barr) Update of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Regional Recharge Model, $16,549 spent in FY2012 (Barr) Projects continued this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) Projects completed this year: Feasibility Assessment & Guidance for Stormwater Reuse, $65,773 spent in FY2012 (CDM Smith) South Washington County Water Supply Planning (Metropolitan Council) Feasibility Assessment & Guidance for Stormwater Reuse, $65,773 spent in FY2012 (CDM Smith) Mapping the Vulnerability of Glacial Aquifers & Mapping Contaminant Plumes, $27,850 in FY2012 (U of MN - MN Geological Survey) South Washington County Water Supply Planning (Metropolitan Council) ",,,,212673,,,1.8,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2011,400000,"M.L. 2010, Chp. 361 Art. 2, Sec. 5 This appropriation has also supported the projects done in FY2011: M.L. 2009, Chp. 172 Art. 2, Sec. 10 ",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Feasibility Assessment & Guidance for Stormwater Reuse, $21,695 spent in FY2011 (CDM Smith) Mapping the Vulnerability of Glacial Aquifers & Mapping Contaminant Plumes, $23,181 in FY2011 (U of MN - MN Geological Survey) Seminary Fen Protection (Metropolitan Council) South Washington County Water Supply Planning (Metropolitan Council) South Washington County Water Supply Planning (Metropolitan Council) Projects continuing this year: Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) Projects completed this year: Assessment of East Bethel Water Availability (Groundwater Modeling), $44,536 spent in FY2011 (Barr) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Water Conservation, $36,754 spent in SFY2011 (Environmental Financing Group Inc.) Evaluation of Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction, $31,754 spent in FY2011 (Barr) Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Chemistry Assessment, $48,138 spent in FY2011 (U of MN - MN Geological Survey) ",,,,355552,,,1.1,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 10025348,"Water Supply Sustainability Support Program",2010,400000,"M.L. 2009, Chp. 172 Art. 2, Sec. 10",,"This work is intended to support increased collaboration among metro area communities and water agencies, including participation in subregional water supply work groups. It will enhance the technical support that communities receive, including studies and tools requested by metro area subregional water supply groups and committees and the Minnesota Legislature. One indicator of success will be more efficient and balanced water use. ","Projects started this year: Assessment of East Bethel Water Availability (Groundwater Modeling), $26,593 spent in SFY2010 (Barr) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Water Conservation, $11,785 spent in SFY2010 (Environmental Financing Group Inc.) Evaluation of Groundwater and Surface Water Interaction, $35,246 spent in FY2010 (Barr) Hydrogeologic and Groundwater Chemistry Assessment, $18,226 spent in FY2010 (U of MN - MN Geological Survey) Implementation of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area Master Water Supply Plan (Metropolitan Council) ",,,,246702,,,1.5,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","This program supports communities as they plan and implement projects that address emerging drinking water supply threats. It supports the exploration cost-effective regional and sub-regional solutions, leverages inter-jurisdictional coordination, and prevents overuse and degradation of groundwater resources. Activities in this program provide metro communities with: Potential solutions to balance regional water use through utilization of surface water, stormwater, wastewater, and groundwater Planning-level analyses of infrastructure requirements for various water supply alternatives Planning-level cost estimates (capital investments and operation) Identification of funding mechanisms and equitable cost-sharing structures for regionally beneficial water supply projects In advisory committees, work groups, and other venues, the Metropolitan Council partners with local units of government, state agencies, and other stakeholder groups to collaboratively address local and regional water supply issues in the metro area. ","The Twin Cities metropolitan area is home to three million people, over half of Minnesota's population. Over 70% of the region's population relies on groundwater resources for their source of water supply. Securing their safe and plentiful drinking water, while protecting the region's diverse water resources, requires coordinated and ongoing effort. Although the seven-county region is relatively water-rich, the region's steady population growth, increased groundwater pumping, changing land use, and variable weather and climate is challenging some communities' ability to meet current and future demand. Our rising dependence on groundwater for drinking water, particularly since 1980, has become a significant issue. In parts of the region, groundwater levels are declining. In some cases, it is affecting, or has the potential to affect, lake and wetland levels. Additionally, groundwater quality is a challenge that many cities are trying to address. ",,2009-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Lanya,Ross,"Metropolitan Council ","390 Robert St. N.","St. Paul",MN,55101,651-602-1803,lanya.ross@metc.state.mn.us,,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-supply-sustainability-support-program,,,, 33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2024,750000,"M.L. 2023, Chapter 40, Art. 2, Sec. 8, Subd. (b)","$750,000 the first year and $750,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage municipalities in the metropolitan area to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","The goal of the water efficiency grant program is to support technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Grants can be used for rebates to residents and commercial properties that replace inefficient water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water, or for irrigation system audits. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Communities used grant funds to lower the cost of resident purchase and installation of products that reduce water use, such as EPA WaterSense labeled low-flow toilets, Energy Star labeled washing machines, and WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers, WaterSense labeled irrigation spray sprinkler bodies, and WaterSense Partner-certified irrigation system audits. Thirty-seven communities participated in the 2022-2024 grant program. Grant recipients and award amounts included: Apple Valley $35,000, Bayport $8,000, Bloomington $25,000, Brooklyn Park $11,000, Chanhassen $34,440, Circle Pines $9,600, Coon Rapids $26,000, Cottage Grove $43,000, Eagan $42,000, Eden Prairie $44,000, Farmington $11,000, Forest Lake $26,000, Fridley $10,000, Hugo $36,000, Lake Elmo $43,000, Lakeville $43,000, Lino Lakes $24,000, Maple Grove $45,000, Minnetonka $22,000, New Brighton $28,000, North St. Paul $22,000, Plymouth $35,000, Prior Lake $9,600, Ramsey $19,800, Robbinsdale $6,080, Rosemount $34,000, Roseville $12,000, Savage $30,000, Shakopee Public Utilities Commission $49,000, Shoreview $16,000, Shorewood $8,400, St. Louis Park $25,000, Stillwater $25,000, Victoria $39,000, White Bear Lake $23,000, White Bear Township $38,000, Woodbury $40,000. Additionally, provided $150,000 in grant money to Saint Paul Regional Water Services to install seven advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) collectors in designated areas of concentrated poverty in Saint Paul. From 7/1/2023 through 6/30/2024:  3,654 devices were replaced 1,214 toilets 701 irrigation controllers 290 irrigation spray sprinkler bodies 911 clothes washers 538 dishwashers 29 irrigation system audits From estimated water savings provided by grantees, approximately 34,655,455 gallons will be saved each year by these grant activities.  ",,100430,"20% local match ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",, 33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2023,625000,"M.L. 2021, 1st Special Session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 8, Subd. (b)","$625,000 the first year and $625,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage municipalities in the metropolitan area to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","The goal of the water efficiency grant program is to support technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Grants can be used for rebates to residents and commercial properties that replace inefficient water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water, or for irrigation system audits. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Communities used grant funds to lower the cost of resident purchase and installation of products that reduce water use, such as EPA WaterSense labeled low-flow toilets, Energy Star labeled washing machines, and WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers, WaterSense labeled irrigation spray sprinkler bodies, and WaterSense Partner-certified irrigation system audits. Thirty-seven communities participated in the 2022-2024 grant program.  Grant recipients and amounts included: Apple Valley $35,000, Bayport $8,000, Bloomington $25,000, Brooklyn Park $11,000, Chanhassen $34,440, Circle Pines $9,600, Coon Rapids $26,000, Cottage Grove $43,000, Eagan $42,000, Eden Prairie $44,000, Farmington $11,000, Forest Lake $26,000, Fridley $10,000, Hugo $36,000, Lake Elmo $43,000, Lakeville $43,000, Lino Lakes $24,000, Maple Grove $45,000, Minnetonka $22,000, New Brighton $28,000, North St. Paul $22,000, Plymouth $35,000, Prior Lake $9,600, Ramsey $19,800, Robbinsdale $6,080, Rosemount $34,000, Roseville $12,000, Savage $30,000, Shakopee Public Utilities Commission $49,000, Shoreview $16,000, Shorewood $8,400, St. Louis Park $25,000, Stillwater $25,000, Victoria $39,000, White Bear Lake $23,000, White Bear Township $38,000, Woodbury $40,000. From 7/1/2022 - 6/30/2023 3336 devices were replaced 1149  toilets 1038 irrigation controllers 95 irrigation spray sprinkler bodies 567 clothes washers 487 dishwashers 113  irrigation system audits From estimated water savings provided by grantees, approximately 39,629,421 gallons will be saved each year by these grant activities ",,108491,"20% Local match. ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",, 33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2022,625000,"M.L. 2021, 1st Special Session, Chp. 1, Art. 2, Sec. 8, Subd. (b)","$625,000 the first year and $625,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage municipalities in the metropolitan area to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","The goal of the water efficiency grant program is to support technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Grants can be used for rebates to residents and commercial properties that replace inefficient water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water, or for irrigation system audits. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Communities used grant funds to lower the cost of resident purchase and installation of products that reduce water use, such as EPA WaterSense labeled low-flow toilets, Energy Star labeled washing machines, and WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers, WaterSense labeled irrigation spray sprinkler bodies, and WaterSense Partner-certified irrigation system audits. From 7/1/2021-6/30/2022 2590 devices were replaced 1020 toilets 720 irrigation controllers 405 irrigation spray sprinkler bodies 445 clothes washers 15 irrigation system audits From estimated water savings provided by grantees, approximately 29,597,009 gallons will be saved each year by these grant activities ",,85583,"25% Local match ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",, 33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2021,375000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9, Subd. (b)","$375,000 the first year and $375,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage municipalities in the metropolitan area to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","The goal of the water efficiency grant program is to support technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Grants can be used for rebates to residents and commercial properties that replace inefficient water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water, or for irrigation system audits. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Communities used grant funds to lower the cost of resident purchase and installation of products that reduce water use, such as EPA WaterSense labeled low-flow toilets, Energy Star labeled washing machines, and WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers, WaterSense labeled irrigation spray sprinkler bodies, and WaterSense Partner-certified irrigation system audits. Thirty-seven communities participated in the 2019-2022 program.  Grant recipients and amounts included: Apple Valley $29,000, Bloomington $21,000, Brooklyn Center $8,000, Brooklyn Park $10,300, Chanhassen $19,300, Chaska $14,000, Cottage Grove $27,300, Dayton $2,000, Eagan $30,300, Eden Prairie $44,300, Farmington $10,543.40, Forest Lake $12,300, Fridley $24,300, Hopkins $19,000, Hugo $31,300, Lake Elmo $35,000, Lakeville $36,000, Mahtomedi $6,300, Minnetonka $20,000, New Brighton $18,300, North St. Paul $23,000, Oakdale $1,315.63, Plymouth $33,300, Prior Lake $8,000, Ramsey $28,000, Robbinsdale $8,000, Rosemount $11,300, Roseville $10,000, Savage $11,000, Shakopee Public Utilities Commission $23,300, Shoreview $23,000, Shorewood $19,000, St. Louis Park $23,000, Victoria $12,300, White Bear Lake $34,300, White Bear Township $44,300, Woodbury $50,300. 4,416 devices were replaced 1,348 toilets 2,091 irrigation controllers 26 irrigation spray sprinkler bodies 915 clothes washers 36 irrigation system audits  From estimated water savings provided by grantees, approximately 92,500,000 gallons per year will be saved each year by these replacements.  ",,83506,"25% Local match ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",, 33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2020,375000,"M.L. 2019, 1st Special Session, Chp. 2, Art. 1, Sec. 9, Subd. (b)","$375,000 the first year and $375,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage municipalities in the metropolitan area to implement measures to reduce water demand to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","The goal of the water efficiency grant program is to work with municipal water suppliers to help increase water efficiency in their communities. Grants can be used for rebates to residents and commercial properties that replace inefficient water-using devices with approved devices that use substantially less water, or for irrigation system audits. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Outcomes (cost savings, water savings, and device replacements) were reported at the end of the project. ",,41534,"25% Local match. Other Funds Leveraged for FY 2020 only includes local match from Q1 and Q2 of 2020. ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",, 33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2017,250000,"M.L. 2015, Chapter 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9, Subd. (b)","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage implementation of water demand reduction measures by municipalities in the metropolitan area to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","A pilot program for water efficiency was established with the goal of supporting technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Qualified activities include replacement of toilet with EPA WaterSense certified high-efficiency toilets, residential clothes washing machine replacements with Energy Star certified washing machines, irrigation system audits by EPA WaterSense certified professionals, and irrigation controller replacements with EPA WaterSense certified replacements. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Communities used grant funds to lower the cost of resident purchase and installation of products that reduce water use, such as EPA WaterSense labeled low-flow toilets, Energy Star labeled washing machines, and WaterSense labeled irrigation controllers, and WaterSense Partner-certified irrigation system audits. Nineteen communities participated in this 2015-2017 program. Grant recipients and amounts included: Brooklyn Park $7,500, Chanhassen $37,500, Circle Pines $15,000, Cottage Grove $8,250, Eagan $50,000, Eden Prairie $37,500, Forest Lake $40,000, Fridley $30,000, Hugo $36,000, Mahtomedi $10,000, New Brighton $50,000, Newport $27,000, Plymouth $18,750, Rosemount $9,000, Shakopee $50,000, Victoria $9,000, White Bear Lake $49,125, White Bear Township $24,000, Woodbury $50,000. 4,514 devices were replaced 2,380 toilets 1,190 irrigation controllers 940 clothes washers 4 irrigation system audits From estimated water savings provided by grantees, approximately 52,000,000 gallons per year will be saved each year by these replacements.  ",,205742,"25% Local match plus additional funds ($155,125 across FY 2016 and FY 2017). Grant awards in excess of the appropriated $500,000 were funded by Clean Water Funds. ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",, 33840,"Water Efficiency Grant Program",2016,250000,"M.L. 2015, Chapter 2, Art. 2, Sec. 9, Subd. (b)","$250,000 the first year and $250,000 the second year are for the water demand reduction grant program to encourage implementation of water demand reduction measures by municipalities in the metropolitan area to ensure the reliability and protection of drinking water supplies. ","A pilot program for water efficiency was established with the goal of supporting technical and behavioral changes that improve municipal water use efficiency in the seven-county metropolitan area. Qualified activities include replacement of toilet with EPA WaterSense certified high-efficiency toilets, residential clothes washing machine replacements with Energy Star certified washing machines, irrigation system audits by EPA WaterSense certified professionals, and irrigation controller replacements with EPA WaterSense certified replacements. Proposed measurable outcomes are cost savings, water savings, and device replacements. ","Outcomes (cost savings, water savings, and device replacements) were reported at the end of the project. ",,103477,"25% Local match plus additional funds ($155,125 across FY 2016 and FY 2017). Grant awards in excess of the appropriated $500,000 were funded by Clean Water Funds. ",,,,,"Metropolitan Council","Local/Regional Government","The Metropolitan Council was awarded $1,500,000 from Minnesota Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment funds for a Water Efficiency Grant Program during the Minnesota Legislature's 2023 Session. The Metropolitan Council (Council) implemented a water efficiency grant program effective July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2026. Grants were awarded on a competitive basis to municipalities that are served by a municipal water system. The Council provides 80% of the program cost; the municipality must provide the remaining 20%. Municipalities use the combined Council and municipality funds to run their own grant or rebate programs. Grants were made available in amounts with a minimum of $5,000 and a maximum of $50,000. Grantees are required to provide estimated water savings achieved through this program for Clean Water, Land & Legacy Amendment reporting purposes. ",,,2016-07-01,2026-06-30,"Clean Water Fund",Ongoing,,,Henry,McCarthy,"Metropolitan Council","390 Robert Street North","St. Paul",MN,55101,"(651) 602-1946",henry.mccarthy@metc.state.mn.us,Grants/Contracts,"Metropolitan Council",,"Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, Washington",,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/water-efficiency-grant-program,,"Zelle, Johnson, Chamblis, Carter, Barber, Pacheco, Lilligren, Osman, Cameron, Morales, Lindstrom, Cederberg, Vento, Lee, Carter, Dolkar, Wulff ",, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2024,,,,"In FY24, the DNR has sunset its CWF watershed modeling activities. Instead, program staff will primarily be focusing on the culvert replacement incentive program funded by the CWF. The Cascade Creek hydrology study will be completed under the nonpoint technical assistance program. Outcomes from this effort will be reported in that section of the report. ",,,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2023,,,,"In FY23 DNR will complete the water storage sensitivity analysis for cover crops using at least two existing watershed models. The goal is to provide local watershed planning groups with a simple approach to estimate water storage benefits from different levels of cover crop adoption. The DNR is also initiating a second effort to provide guidance on water storage benefits that looks at the benefits of channel restoration and reconnecting them to their floodplains. ","The DNR initiated a study on the Cascade Creek restoration project with the aim to quantify the hydrologic benefit of providing water storage through channel restoration and reconnecting floodplains. DNR completed modeling analysis of water storage benefits of cover crops and presented this work at the Minnesota Water Resources Conference as well as at several other internal and external venues. Data from the watershed modeling effort was provided to the USACE Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC), to incorporate into their research efforts. ",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2022,,,,"Program priorities in FY22 include technical support for geomorphic design of stream crossings and expanded analysis and dissemination of the results from the evaluation of hydrologic change. Specific projects for this geomorphic design of stream crossings will include Dry Creek and Gorman Creek. DNR will continue to develop methods and tools to improve efficiency of the analysis and design process. We will also seek additional opportunities to enhance and expand this effort by collaborating with other agencies and organizations. DNR will also assist with the ongoing statewide analysis of hydrologic change including the synthesis of results into statewide maps depicting patterns in climate and stream flow. Help develop watershed hydrology report cards to improve the communication of these results to local partners and other state agencies involved in watershed planning efforts. ","The DNR was expanded upon previous watershed modeling efforts. Modeling for the Dobbins Creek Watershed was completed in the previous year to help Mower County SWCD quantify the benefits of their best management practices. This year, the results from this were incorporated into a document and presented as a case study for a two-day hydrology workshop. In addition, program staff initiated a new effort to use existing models to conduct a sensitivity analysis on the water storage benefits of cover crops. When complete, this work will be useful a useful guide for local watershed when developing the water storage strategy required as part of One Watershed One Plan. ",,,,72509,6760,,0.5,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2021,165000,,,"In FY21 program staff will continue efforts to expand modeling capabilities. One area of interest is exploring options for incorporating downscaled climate model results into GSSHA to simulate climate change impacts. Staff are participating in the project funded by the Water Research Foundation to look at innovative approaches for flood mitigation planning and under extreme wet weather events. We will also continue to engage with watershed modelers at the University of Minnesota to improve our processes. This will include exploring the applications of machine learning to predict watershed hydrological changes under the impacts of climate and land use changes. Clean Water modeling applications for FY 21 include completing the analysis of Dobbins Creek watershed and a report evaluating best management practices and a second report evaluating impact of agricultural drainage tile. We also anticipate using the model develop the Dry Creek (Olmsted County) to study land-use scenarios climate change and effects of various stressors on floodplain and channel connectivity. Finally staff will continue to provide technical support for the evaluation of hydrologic change analysis for the remaining gaged watersheds and assist with report.","DNR watershed modeling staff completed a report for Dobbins Creek watershed on the effectiveness of BMPs to address water quality and flooding issues. A separate report was completed that analyzed the effect of drain tiles and cover crops. Results from these reports were shared with state and local partners through presentations and factsheets. DNR provided technical support for stream channel stability and geomorphic design for potential culvert replacement projects. This program promotes a natural design approach for stream crossings to reduce flooding and erosion as well as improve fish passage. As part of this effort DNR developed a model for Dry Creek to assess hydrology and sediment transport. DNR is involved in several other potential stream crossing design projects throughout southern and central Minnesota. DNR also continued to play a key role in implementing a standardized approach for evaluating altered stream hydrology. The evaluation of hydrologic change was completed for 63 stream gages across Minnesota. DNR is using this information to develop plain language communications aimed at participants in local watershed planning efforts.",,,,131364,6473,,0.8,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2020,170000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY20 DNR watershed modelers will: -Continuing to work with the Minnesota Supercomputer Institute to adapt GSSHA for the supercomputer in order to increase modeling program capacity. -Explore potential collaboration with the University of Minnesota using machine learning to improve watershed modeling and management. -Run additional scenarios for Shakopee Creek tributary model. -Run drain tile scenario and additional land use scenario for Shakopee Creek parent model. -Finish calibration and validation of Huse Creek model. -Develop and run model scenarios for Dobbins Creek to assess effectiveness of proposed management activities on reducing peak flow. -Help finalize the methods guidance document for altered hydrology tools and assist with staff training on procedures. ","Clean Water modeling program staff continued to explore avenues for expanding modeling capacity. Staff participated in a symposium hosted by the University of Minnesota focused on using machine learning to improve watershed modeling and management. Program staff extended existing modeling applications for Dobbins Creek GSSHA (Mower County) model to analyze water quality and flooding issues. Staff developed and ran model scenarios to assess effectiveness of proposed management activities on reducing peak flow. Additional scenarios were run to evaluate the impact of agricultural drainage tiles and perennial cover on hydrology. Program staff also played a key role in developing a comprehensive standardized approach to evaluate altered hydrology for streams. Staff provided technical support for method development developed programming scripts to automate the analysis assisted with training and helped write the documentation. In addition staff assisted with a pilot project to implement these analysis methods.",,,,84437,16527,,0.8,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2019,165000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY19 DNR watershed modelers will: • Work with the Cedar River Watershed District to model the effect of adopted and proposed land use practices on flood flows and water quality. • Finalize and provide report to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) on a Shakopee Creek tributary report assessing the effect of six land use scenarios on hydrology and sediment transport. • Help refine the DNR’s approach to evaluating watershed hydrologic change. Help review altered hydrology assessment techniques and train staff to do the assessments. • Collaborate with the University of Minnesota Supercomputing Institute and the ACE on developing steps to use the supercomputer to simulate how land use changes may alter hydrology sediment and nutrient processes to better address clean water initiatives. This will result in faster more efficient simulations `and more representative presentations.",,,,,84437,16527,,0.8,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2018,176762,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY18 DNR watershed modelers will: • Finalize a report on the Discovery Farms modeling project in Goodhue County and present key findings at the 2017 MN Water Resources Conference. • Continue to collaborate with modeling experts at the University of MN and the Army Corp of Engineers to evaluate and improve limitations in the current suite of models including developing and evaluating values for sediment transport parameters. • Collaborate with the MN Pollution Control Agency in using the larger Shakopee Creek Watershed model developed in FY17 to help evaluate water quality benefits for the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR)’s Working Lands Watershed Restoration Program. • Continue to collaborate with Mower County Soil & Water Conservation District on how to use watershed models to help document measureable improvements as on-the-ground projects are implemented. • Finalize a report on previous years’ Shakopee Creek modeling efforts for the MN River Integrated Watershed Study. • Incorporate results from watershed modeling studies into a DNR report on altered hydrology at the request of the interagency Drainage Management Team led by BWSR. • Work with the Discovery Farm Program’s technical team to identify additional modeling priorities and next steps. • Gain access to a University of MN supercomputer to reduce model run times.","In FY18 DNR watershed modelers: • Provided final report to the Discovery Farm in Goodhue County describing the modeled results relating the effect of existing land use practices and proposed best management practices on the hydrologic sediment and nutrient processes. • Provided the final report on the MN Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) Working Lands Shakopee Creek project to BWSR and presented results at the 2018 MN Water Resources Conference. Simulated the effect of BWSR and DNR recommended land use changes on hydrologic sediment and nutrient processes. • Provided technical assistance on hydrology sediment and nutrient -process modeling in the GSSHA model to a University of Minnesota researcher.",,,,114407,47765,,1.1,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2017,202000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY17 the DNR will: • Complete Shakopee Creek modeling and summarize the results in a detailed report on land management scenarios for local watershed initiatives and decision-support products being developed by the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study partnership. • Work with the Cedar River Watershed District to evaluate one or more BMP strategies review BMP effectiveness and complete a report on project outcomes. • Sponsor a University of Minnesota research project to compare the ability of existing GSSHA vs. SWAT models for Dobbins Creek to predict rates of nutrient loss. • Expand modeling at existing Discovery Farm sites to add nutrient loss rates and sediment erosion to BMP evaluations. • Develop a fine-scale GSSHA model to test its capacity to help inform decisions on proposed drainage improvement projects and selection of associated BMPs. • Present modeling results at an International Drainage Symposium hosted by the University of Minnesota. • Continue to provide technical expertise to drainage-related technical and policy workgroups and issues in various forums. ","In FY17 DNR watershed modelers: • Collaborated with modeling experts at the University of MN and the Army Corp of Engineers to evaluate the capacity to model nutrient loss rates identify modeling limitations and discuss potential solutions. • Completed a modeling project with Discovery Farms Program (Goodhue County site); expanded the model to include sediment transport and nutrient loss estimates; examined water quality benefits associated with practices that increase soil organic content; completed a draft report and presented the results. • Gave four presentations at a University of MN International Drainage Symposium highlighting key areas of learning from the DNR’s watershed modeling work. • Finished Shakopee Creek modeling runs of six alternative land management scenarios to help inform local watershed initiatives and decision-support products being developed by the MN River Integrated Watershed Study partnership. Presented the results at several forums. • Collaborated with Mower County Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD) to complete a model predicting the reduction in sediment erosion and hydrologic flow when all projects in the Cedar River Watershed District’s Targeted Watershed grant project are implemented. Presented the results to SWCD staff and discussed how to track future implementation success. • Continued to provide technical expertise to drainage-related technical and policy workgroups. • Developed a GSSHA model for the larger Shakopee Creek Watershed to enhance comparisons with MPCA’s modeling products. ",,,,10622,44566,,1.4,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2016,202000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY16 the DNR will collaborate with the Army Corps of Engineers and other partners of the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study to complete fine-scale modeling and translate products into guidance for selecting best management practices at the basin scale. We will complete model scenarios for Shakopee Creek case studies and start developing “scaling” rules to help translate field-research findings on BMP effectiveness into decision-support guidance for restoration and protection efforts throughout the Minnesota River Basin. We will continue the Discovery Farms research by further developing the field-scale GSSHA models of selected research plots using data collected during edge of field monitoring. The model format for Discovery Farms data is designed to help the Minnesota Agricultural Water Resource Center evaluate how well BMPs work over a wider range of climatic conditions compared to the actual period the practices were monitored. We will also support a Cedar River Watershed District (CRWD) watershed restoration initiative by refining an existing GSSHA model for Dobbins Creek to evaluate one or more BMP implementation strategies identified by the CRWD. We will continue to work with MPCA’s HSPF model on the St. Louis River Watershed. We will adapt the Swedish RIM “RIM” model or “Riparian Profile Flow-Concentration Model ” for use with HSPF to model a number of parameters in the St. Louis River (dissolved organic carbon total mercury methylmercury iron and sulfate concentrations). We will incorporate an extensive set of chemical and flow data collected in 2013 by the DNR into the model. This involves extending MPCA’s initial hydrologic calibration from 2012 to 2014","In FY16 the DNR used fine-scale GSSHA modeling results to support several projects and partnerships to improve the selection placement and design of agricultural best management practices (BMPs) in southern Minnesota. Specifically we: -Continued collaborating with the Army Corps of Engineers and other Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study partners to complete fine-scale modeling in the Shakopee and Seven-Mile Creek subwatersheds and develop products to guide the selection of BMPs at the basin scale. -Developed and delivered modeling results to the Chippewa River Board and stakeholders to guide planning efforts to reestablish shallow lakes that were previously drained. -Assembled a video for the Smithsonian WaterWays Exhibit showing how hydrologic models can help guide management decisions to protect important recreational lakes in the Shakopee Creek system. -Completed models for two Discovery Farm sites that will be used by the Minnesota Agricultural Water Resource Center and partnering farmers. The models indicate that changes in soil organic matter content and modifications to tile drainage practices will reduce runoff and soil erosion and increase soil water availability. -Completed three models at different scales for the Dobbins Creek Watershed to help the Cedar River Watershed District decide which BMPs to implement as part of the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR)’s Targeted Watershed Grant Program. -Continued providing technical expertise to drainage-related technical and policy workgroups and issues in various forums. Staff in the DNR Division of Lands & Minerals collaborated with MPCA staff to write a peer-reviewed paper published in the Journal of Environmental Management about the St. Louis River research described in the proposed outcomes above for FY16.",,,,277403,44144,,2.4,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2015,185000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY15 the DNR will collaborate with the Army Corps of Engineers and other Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study partners to complete fine-scale modeling and translate products into best management practice (BMP) guidance at the basin scale. Staff will complete model scenarios for Shakopee Creek case studies and start developing “scaling” rules to help translate field-research findings on BMP effectiveness into decision-support guidance for restoration and protection efforts throughout the Minnesota River Basin. In coordination with the MN Agricultural Water Resource Center and MN Department of Agriculture modelers will aid Discovery Farms research by developing field-scale GSSHA models of selected research plots to help evaluate BMP effectiveness and reduce uncertainty in interpreting the monitored data. A model format for Discovery Farms data will help evaluate BMP effectiveness over a wider range of climatic conditions than occurred during the monitoring period and improve site-to-site comparisons. Staff will also support a Cedar River Watershed District (CRWD) watershed restoration initiative by refining an existing GSSHA model for Dobbins Creek to incorporate drainage tile so the effects of tile drainage practices can be accurately evaluated together with other BMPs. The results will help refine BMPs recommendations. The DNR will continue collaborating with soil scientists to understand and model soil health management to support drainage and water quality goals. Staff will compile soil health research from multiple sources to ensure the best science is used to explain how soil characteristics change in response to changing tillage practices and other BMPs and accurately incorporate soil physics into reliable model parameters. Staff will continue to coordinate with the Drainage Work Group and provide technical support for the Drainage Management Team as they review Minnesota’s drainage policies and code.","In FY15 the DNR continued to work with the Army Corps of Engineers and other Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study (MRIWS) partners. The goal is to improve the predictions these models make about the effectiveness of potential watershed restoration activities. We developed a tool that will help combine land use land cover and crop management practices with soil type in the model which will estimate differences in water flow as these relationships change. Maps showing locations for targeted BMPs that will significantly reduce sediment loading are being used by local SWCDs to work with individual landowners. The use of detailed maps at a fine scale in this targeting exercise demonstrates the value of the GSSHA modeling in identifying the effectiveness of BMP implementation at both field and watershed scales. We worked with the Discovery Farms research team to develop a field-scale GSSHA model based on actual monitoring data. The model gives a detailed summary of water balance with and without a pattern tile drainage system for both corn and soybean rotations helping evaluate BMP effectiveness and interpret monitoring data in a pattern tiled field. The DNR’s mining hydrologists worked with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to enhance their HSPF (Hydrologic Simulation Program Fortran) model for the St. Louis River watershed by: 1) improving the mining discharge information in the model and; 2) developing user input files that incorporate “chemical tracers” to mine waters so that impacts from mining and other activities can be evaluated more quickly and accurately. This work will help better identify sources of pollution problems make mine permitting decisions and target restoration plans.",,,,170831,41287,,1.9,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2014,185000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY14 the DNR watershed modeling team will continue its work with the Cannon River stakeholders and use the modeling experience developed for the Maple Creek Subwatershed to evaluate how to target and select BMPs for the adjacent Turtle Creek Subwatershed. The DNR watershed modeling team will complete the Shakopee Creek case studies (JD 27 and JD29) as well as third subwatershed (Huse Creek) which will serve as a reference watershed. The DNR will combine the results of the Shakopee Creek case studies with those of the Army COE modelers (who are modeling 7-Mile Creek) to address historical impacts of wetland loss and drainage in the Minnesota River Basin and to help develop a watershed strategy to address TMDL goals. The DNR’s Drainage Engineer will continue to coordinate with the Drainage Work Group on drainage policy and reshaping state drainage code. The modeling team will work cooperatively with University of Minnesota researchers and others to increase our understanding on how BMPs change soil properties that are used in models to interpret hydrologic response. The modeling team will also cooperate with University of Minnesota researchers on a pilot project that will help evaluate how drainage alters the value of land. This project may lead to improvements in determining the benefits and impacts from drainage and who should pay for maintenance of drainage systems and drainage system improvements that may benefit others than the landowners where the improvements are made.","In FY14 the DNR continued to work with the Army Corps Of Engineers and other partners involved in the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study (MRIWS). DNR’s three modeling case studies in the Shakopee Creek watershed were not completed. Instead effort was focused on stakeholder meetings and MRIWS team meetings to identify the specific series of landscape conditions (model scenarios) that need to be evaluated. Because improved soil health management will be a critical component of water restoration and protection strategies existing research on soil physics was carefully reviewed to insure that our models accurately represent those processes. Significant effort was also invested in FY14 to improve how climate and rainfall data are incorporated into our models. Climatic parameters are key drivers of how water (and pollutants) moves across and through landscapes. Accurately incorporating this information is critical if our modeling efforts are going to simulate physical processes in the landscape and provide reliable decision-support guidance. A guidance document on radar precipitation estimation was prepared. The DNR’s Drainage Engineer continued to provide expert technical input into the effort being led by the Board of Water and Soil Resources to review Minnesota’s drainage policy and code. Input was provided to both the Drainage Work Group (DWG) and the Drainage Management Team (DMT). The DNR continued to participate on the Interagency Clean Water Research Sub-Team led that prioritizes and guides research studies paid for by the clean water fund. These studies are designed to improve understanding of BMP effectiveness and develop guidance for targeting and installation of these beneficial practices. The Cannon River/Straight River GSSHA pilot study with the MPCA and Cannon River stakeholders is on hold after the lead modeler left state service. ",,,,122059,32439,,1.3,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2013,230000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY13 the DNR watershed modeling team will work with the Cannon River stakeholders to complete the Straight River prioritization of Management Zones (PMZs) in support of TMDL implementation strategies. A report summarizing this effort will be completed. The Shakopee Creek case studies will be completed to address impacts of wetland loss and drainage impacts with assessments reflecting historic land use changes. Coordination with the MRIWS team will help identify additional watershed assessment needs to begin the development of a strategy for targeting BMPs that will support the framework for a Decision Support System (DSS). A draft report of modeling outcomes will be prepared. CW Modeling Team will work with the States’ CW team to coordinate other critical modeling needs that can be initiated in FY13. The CW Drainage Engineer will continue to coordinate with the DWG and others doing drainage research to identify critical gaps in this research. ","In FY13 the DNR watershed modeling team worked with stakeholders in the Cannon River watershed to target and prioritize the placement of best management practices (BMPs) in the Maple Creek Subwatershed (part of the Straight River watershed). The analysis predicted that a combination of the most effective BMPs would reduce suspended sediment by up to 40% and reduce peak storm flows by up to 6% if implemented at realistic landowner adoption rates. The results provided information based on the specific characteristics of the Maple Creek subwatershed on how to target the types and locations of BMPs to maximize improvements in runoff quality and quantity. A draft report summarizing this effort was completed and is available to the partners for their inclusion in the development prioritized and targeted implementation activities. The Shakopee Creek case studies were not completed as scheduled in FY13 because the overall project is behind schedule due to reduced levels of federal funding. DNR’s watershed modeling team began establishing a process for incorporating radar derived precipitation estimates into the model so the model better represents that local rainfall conditions resulting in a more accurately calibrated model. DNR’s Drainage Engineer continues to coordinate with the Drainage Work Group and others doing drainage research to identify critical gaps in our knowledge and decision-support capacity. Coordination with the team developing the Agricultural Certification Pilot in Minnesota identified opportunities for using the GSSHA model to help document the effectiveness of that program to deliver desired outcomes and progress toward meeting TMDL goals. ",,,,266359,37517,,1.3,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2012,230000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY12 DNR hydrologists will apply the ""Gridded Subsurface Surface Hydrologic Analysis"" (GSSHA) model to evaluate BMP alternatives for clean water restoration and protection studies and will participate in Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team meetings to help identify research needs and shortcomings in outdated State Drainage Code language Modeling: * Calibrate Shakopee Creek wetland and lake restoration GSSHA models to support restoration and BMP prioritization efforts in Chippewa River Basin. * Finalize Straight River (Cannon River Watershed) GSSHA Model Calibrations for TSS and work with CRWP on Prioritizing Management Zones in Straight River Watershed in support of TMDL implementation.","In FY12 DNR watershed modelers updated data inputs for GSSHA models in Shakopee Creek and the Straight River to reflect more precise watershed characteristics now available with the release of detailed LiDAR digital terrain data. This improvement will result in improved modeling of BMP alternatives. Support for the Straight River TMDL implementation is under way. The Turtle Creek model has been calibrated and preliminary BMP targeting in the Maple Creek Watershed is being coordinated with our partners in the Cannon River Watershed. Work continues on the Minnesota River Integrated Watershed Study (MRIWS). Watershed modelers met to prioritize where case studies will be performed and to determine what issues are critical outcomes of these case studies. Work continues with the stakeholders in Shakopee Creek to determine critical outcomes from this case study and how this information will support the MRIWS. Desired outcomes will include wetland restoration benefits and impacts of lost storage due to drainage of shallow lakes. The Clean Water Drainage Engineer attended all Drainage Work Group (DWG) meetings in addition to supporting the CW research committee in reviewing grant applications for BWSR and MDA CW research. ",,,,107171,38473,,1.2,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2011,95000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY11 DNR hydrologists will apply ""Gridded Subsurface Surface Hydrologic Analysis"" (GSSHA) model to evaluate BMP alternatives for clean water restoration and protection studies: * Shakopee Creek wetland and lake restoration GSSHA analysis * Straight River (Cannon River Watershed) GSSHA Model Calibrations","In FY11 DNR hydrologists participated in all Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team meetings. Modeling: * Shakopee Creek: continued work with national science team to review model options that will provide the best framework for a decision support system that will give data access and guidance to stakeholders. * Prepared preliminary report on GSSHA model calibrations in the Straight River. Models will be used to better identify sources of sediment in the watershed for support of a clean water restoration (Total Maximum Daily Load) study.",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 25359,"Watershed Modeling",2010,85000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY10 DNR will apply the ""Gridded Subsurface Surface Hydrologic Analysis"" (GSSHA) model to evaluate BMP alternatives for clean water restoration and protection studies: * Cedar River culvert sizing * Shakopee Creek wetland and lake restoration * Straight River (Cannon River Watershed)","In FY10 DNR hydrologists participated in all Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Tram meetings. Modeling: * Finalized Cedar River culvert sizing analysis. Presented model results to local governments and watershed science peers. * Shakopee Creek: worked with national science team to review model options that will provide the best framework for a decision support system that will give data access and guidance to stakeholders. * Worked on GSSHA model calibration and refinement to better identify sources of sediment in the watershed for support of a clean water restoration (Total Maximum Daily Load) study.",,,,,,,,,,"The DNR provides technical support related to the causes of altered hydrology and watershed management solutions. We use state-of-the-art models and statistical methods to look at cumulative impacts of drainage and land-use practices and determine the benefits of best management practices. This involves collaboration with multiple partners at multiple scales. For example, we partnered with Discovery Farms Minnesota and the MN Department of Agriculture to help evaluate on-farm water quality management practices and we worked with Mower SWCD on a model to evaluate how implementation projects are moving the county toward its flood and nutrient reduction goals. ","Understanding the impacts of land use on drainage is critical to our ability to protect and restore clean water. Since European settlement, native landscapes - which allow water to filter through healthy vegetation and soils to replenish aquifers - have been replaced by agriculture and urban development with constructed drainage systems designed to move water off the land as quickly as possible. These alterations to the way water flows across the land as well as practices that reduce the capacity for soils to hold water contribute to widespread erosion and habitat loss, as well as increased sediment loading, excess nutrients, bacteria, and other pollution reaching Minnesota's lakes, streams, rivers, and wetlands. ",,2009-07-01,2023-06-30,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Steve,Kloiber,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,,MN,,"(651) 259-5155",steve.kloiber@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Modeling, Planning, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-modeling-0,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2025,1650000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. ","In collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners, continue contributing geomorphic survey and related data, analyses and reports, as well as hydrologic change information from DNR Evaluation of Hydrologic Change (EHC) technical summaries, to aid stressor identification, watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (CWMP) development and implementation under the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program, and other implementation efforts. Fully populate the stream geomorphology survey database that we finished developing in FY24 and complete a public web app to expand access to this information. Continue developing regional curves to help stream practitioners accelerate and validate analyses and design restoration projects.   These information resources will continue to enhance watershed partners’ understanding of biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and help teams identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience (see Nonpoint Restoration and Protection). ",,,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2024,1650000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. "," Stream data and related information: In FY24, DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey and related data, analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners to aid stressor identification, watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, and Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (CWMP) development and implementation under the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program. We anticipate completing and populating the statewide DNR geomorphology survey database built in FY23 to house and organize stream survey data and reports, and starting if not also completing an associated public webmap to expand access to this information. We will continue developing regional curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): We will complete and publish the 25 EHC technical summaries nearly completed in FY23, making the full series (one technical summary for each of 47 major watersheds evaluated) discoverable and searchable in the MN Water Research Library. We plan to publish the statewide EHC meta-analysis completed in FY22 and anticipate completing and posters for at least 20 northwestern Minnesota watersheds begun in FY23 that integrate EHC findings with other information to communicate watershed health conditions, trends, potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers in plain language and graphics. All of the above types of information will continue to enhance watershed partners’ understanding of biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience (see Nonpoint Restoration and Protection). ","Generated information products in the following two categories to help watershed partners understand water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. Stream geomorphology and connectivity data and information: Worked on at least 31 stream geomorphology surveys (some involving multiple sites) in 19 major watersheds, to aid MPCA water quality stressor analysis, WRAPS report updates, regional curve development, and implementation projects. Finished developing a database to house, organize and improve practitioner and public access to stream survey data, summaries and reports. Continued developing sediment rating, bank erosion and other types of regional curves to help practitioners better predict stream channel sediment loads, validate stream analyses, and design restoration projects. Began culvert inventories in four major watersheds, in subwatersheds selected by local partners; the data will be added to the DNR Culvert Inventory Database. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): Finished publishing the 47 EHC watershed technical summaries completed the previous year (see report series in Minnesota Water Research Digital Library). Completed precipitation analyses for 12 major watersheds in northwestern Minnesota to help interpret and communicate EHC findings. Completed posters for at least 20 major watersheds in northwestern Minnesota, integrating EHC findings with other information to communicate watershed health conditions, trends, impacts and management implications to local watershed managers, in plain language and graphics.   ",,,,1530779,264356,,11.4,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2023,1435000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","Stream data and related information: In FY23, DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey and related data, analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners to aid stressor identification, watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan (CWMP) development and implementation under the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program, and the development of regional curves. We will continue developing the statewide DNR geomorphology web map piloted in FY20 to house, organize and improve access to the above data and information. We will continue developing regional curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): We will complete and publish DNR EHC technical summaries for all 47 of the watersheds evaluated in FY21. Staff will begin using the summaries to disseminate key findings to MPCA staff working on WRAPS updates, local 1W1P partnerships engaged in developing or implementing CWMPs, and other watershed partners. Watershed posters: Staff will continue developing watershed posters and/or similar tools to help integrate EHC and stream geomorphology study findings with other information, identify key takeaways and communicate watersheds conditions and trends as well as potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers, in plain language and graphics. All of the above types of information will continue to help the MPCA and other watershed partners better understand biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience (see Nonpoint Restoration and Protection). "," Stream data and information: Worked on 32 stream surveys (of which we completed 13) in 20 major watersheds. Worked on 12 geomorphology studies, summaries or reports (of which 6 we completed 6) in 6 major watersheds; 5 are intensive subwatershed stream sediment studies. Completed culvert inventories in several subwatersheds. Continued developing sediment rating and other regional curves to help practitioners better predict stream channel sediment loads, validate stream analyses, and help design restoration projects. Built a database to house, organize and improve practitioner and public access to stream survey data and reports, as part of the effort begun in FY21 to centralize and publicize this information. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): Completed 22 technical summaries and nearly completed the other 25 for 47 major watersheds evaluated in FY21. Published most of the completed summaries in the MN Water Research Library (publishing was temporarily stalled as the library moved to a new platform). Began using the summaries to disseminate key findings to watershed partners including MPCA staff working on WRAPS updates and local 1W1P partnerships developing or implementing watershed management plans. Started developing posters for at least 20 major watersheds in northwestern Minnesota, integrating EHC findings with other information to communicate watershed health conditions, trends, potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers in plain language and graphics. All of the above information products helped enhance watershed partners’ understanding of biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. ",,,,1216245,225000,,9.7,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2022,1440000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. "," In FY22 DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey data analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners to aid stressor identification watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development and Comprehensive Watershed Management Plan development and implementation. We will further develop and populate the statewide DNR geomorphology survey data web map piloted in FY20. In FY22 we will develop a template for DNR evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC) technical summaries. We will start and aim to finish producing summaries for all 47 watersheds for which we previously completed an EHC analysis. We will also complete and summarize a statewide meta-analysis and use the results to give statewide and regional context to the watershed-specific evaluations. In FY22 we will complete a project to pilot the interpretation of DNR EHC data by field staff culminating in a graphically designed poster for at least four watersheds. Staff will use the posters to help communicate EHC results together with data from DNR stream geomorphology studies and other information. The posters will help staff use pictures and plain language to describe key facets of watershed health to local watershed planning groups. In FY22 we will continue developing regional sediment rating curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. All of the above types of information help MPCA and other watershed partners better understand biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. ","Stream data and information: Worked on 29 stream surveys (of which we completed 14) in 22 major watersheds. Worked on 14 geomorphology studies, summaries or reports, summaries or reports (of which we completed 7) in 10 major watersheds. The latter 14 included 4 intensive subwatershed stream sediment studies and a catchment-scale sediment reduction plan based on one of these studies. Made significant progress on developing the statewide geomorphology web map piloted in FY20 to house, organize and improve access to the above types of data and information. Continued developing sediment rating and other regional curves to help practitioners better predict stream channel sediment loads for Minnesota streams, validate stream analyses, and help design stream restoration projects. Evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC): Completed a template for EHC technical summaries and started compiling summaries for each of the 47 watersheds evaluated in FY21. Completed a statewide meta-analysis, the results of which are being incorporated into the watershed technical summaries to provide regional and statewide context. Watershed posters: Completed a pilot project to help staff practice interpreting EHC results for watershed partners, resulting in posters for 4 watersheds and leading staff to start developing posters for 5 other watersheds, of which they completed 2. The posters help staff integrate EHC and stream geomorphology study findings with other information, identify key takeaways, and communicate watersheds conditions, trends, potential impacts and management implications to local watershed managers, in plain language and graphics. All of the above data and information products continued to help the MPCA and other watershed partners better understand biological and water quality impairments, improve pollutant load calculations, and identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. ",,,,1430388,200647,,11.9,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2021,1475000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY21 DNR will continue contributing geomorphic survey data analyses and reports in collaboration with the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners primarily to aid stressor identification and watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development. We will continue to populate the channel assessment web map developed in FY20. In FY21 we will complete a consistent repeatable evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC) for every major watershed that has the necessary streamflow gauge data (besides those piloted in FY20)?about 50 evaluations in all?and analyze the results statewide. In four (4) major watersheds we will pilot approaches to help staff interpret and effectively communicate EHC results to local partners especially those who are developing Comprehensive Watershed Management Plans. In FY21 we will continue developing regional sediment rating curves to help accelerate and validate stream analyses and design stream restoration projects. ","Contributed stream geomorphology information for MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) WRAPS updates and local watershed planning and implementation: Worked on 38 stream surveys (completing 21 of these) in 16 major watersheds mostly for MPCA stream stressor identification. Worked on 16 stream geomorphology studies (completing three of these) in 11 major watersheds including eight intensive subwatershed stream sediment studies. Completed standardized evaluation of hydrologic change (EHC) analyses for 59 USGS streamflow gages in 41 major watersheds building on those completed in FY20 for a final total of 65 gages evaluated (every gage that had the necessary data) in 47 watersheds. Completed or worked on six EHC watershed summaries. Began a pilot project in four watersheds to help DNR hydrologists and clean water specialists practice interpreting and communicating EHC watershed analysis results to watersheds partners especially those engaged in local watershed planning. Continued developing regional rating curves to predict stream channel sediment loads for Minnesota streams validate stream analyses and help design stream restoration projects. ",,,,1324021,179580,,12.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2020,1478815,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY20 DNR will continue working with state and local partners in watersheds where the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local governments are developing or updating Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS). We will finish developing and start deploying new methods of analysis to streamline and enhance the hydrology and stream geomorphology information we contribute. Specifically we will evaluate hydrologic change for at least two major watersheds continue subwatershed-scale stream stability and sediment supply studies (important for addressing sediment impairments) in at least five major watersheds and communicate the findings to watershed partners. Faster progress is anticipated in future years as staff gain experience with the new methods. We will also continue to develop regional curves to speed up and validate stream analyses and to help design stream restoration projects. ","Contributed stream geomorphology and connectivity information primarily for watersheds where the MPCA and local partners were developing or updating WRAPS: Conducted at least 41 stream surveys in 15 watersheds and started making the data available in a statewide web map and in story maps such as this one. Collected culvert inventory data in three (3) watersheds to be added to a statewide GIS layer. Completed at least 21 and worked on at least 16 more stream geomorphology analyses or reports in 20 watersheds. Seven (7) of these analyses are intensive subwatershed studies that distinguish stream sources from other sources of sediment in impaired streams to help partners identify catchments where upland restoration efforts stream restoration efforts or a combination will be most effective. Collaborated with MPCA and local partners on the above. MPCA and partners use the information to better understand biological and water quality impairments improve pollutant load calculations and help identify enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience. Completed a major project to standardize streamline and enhance DNR hydrology and stream geomorphology contributions: Finished developing a consistent repeatable method of evaluation to quantify the degree of hydrologic change in a watershed and related impacts to flooding channel-forming flows and biological community health. Staff piloted the evaluation in six (6) major watersheds. In five (5) other major watersheds staff applied a new consistent and repeatable process developed in FY19 to identify subwatersheds where an intensive study of stream stability and sediment supply would be most fruitful for discussion with local partners. Continued developing regional rating curves to predict stream channel sediment loads for Minnesota streams validate stream analyses and help design stream restoration projects. ",,,,1291321,202433,,12.8,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2019,1549694,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY19 DNR field staff will continue working with state and local partners in watersheds where Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) are under way. DNR regional staff will continue to provide information and analysis that helps improve watershed assessments and identify effective and lasting restoration and protection strategies. Measurable outcomes will be similar to those for FY18.","• Contributed hydrology stream geomorphology and connectivity information for 47 watersheds where the MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local partners were developing or updating WRAPS. Gathered and analyzed data for 39 of these—including but not limited to stream studies in 25 watersheds; streamflow precipitation climate and/or lake hydrology data for 28 watersheds; and culvert inventory data or analysis in at least 14 watersheds. Five of the stream studies are multi-year subwatershed-scale stream stability and sediment supply studies essential for addressing sediment impairments. MPCA and partners use this information in several parts of the WRAPS process especially stressor identification to better understand biological and water quality impairments improve pollutant load calculations and identify solutions. • Used the above information to recommend enduring multiple-benefit solutions that address root causes and promote watershed health and resilience in 40 of the 47 watersheds noted above. (See Nonpoint Source Restoration and Protection.) Participated in WRAPS meetings in most of the watersheds and reviewed several draft WRAPS reports. • Continued an effort begun in FY18 to streamline and enhance the hydrology and geomorphology information we contribute by developing consistent processes for evaluating hydrologic change at the major watershed scale and identifying subwatersheds where intensive stream stability and sediment supply studies would be worthwhile. • Continued developing regional curves for Minnesota to enable certain stream characteristics to be inferred based on drainage area and ratings for similar streams. Regional curves are used to validate stream analyses and help design stream restoration projects. In FY19 this involved stream surveys ongoing coordination with the US Geological Survey on sediment sampling in streams and new collaborative work to develop data collection standards for regional streambank erosion curves. ",,,,1291321,202433,,12.5,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2018,1567393,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY18 the DNR will continue working with state and local partners in watersheds where the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (WRAPS) process is active. DNR regional staff will continue to provide information and analysis that helps improve watershed assessments and identify effective and lasting restoration and protection strategies. Measurable outcomes of this work will be similar to those stated for FY17.","In FY18 DNR field staff continued to provide information and analysis to state and local agencies to help identify pollution problems and develop lasting solutions. Staff gathered and analyzed data and information for 35 of the state’s 80 major watersheds including but not limited to 133 stream studies and 7 Total Maximum Daily Load studies. DNR staff synthesize and deliver this information to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local government and community partners to help inform key stages of the WRAPS process – from sample site selection to stressor identification to identifying and targeting implementation strategies. For example the MPCA uses some of this information to help identify pollution sources and refine watershed models used to calculate pollutant loads. In the strategy development stage of the WRAPS process DNR staff use information they gathered and analyzed earlier to help partners identify multiple-benefit strategies that address the root causes of pollution problems. In FY18 they helped WRAPS partners identify these types of strategies in 47 watersheds.",,,,1393491,220382,,15.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2017,1638038,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY17 the DNR will continue working with state and local partners to provide information and analysis that helps improve watershed assessments and identify effective and lasting restoration and protection strategies. Numeric measures of this work will be similar to the outcomes stated for FY16. ","In FY17 DNR regional staff continued to provide information and analysis to state and local agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Staff gathered and analyzed data and information for 52 major watersheds. This included but was not limited to 175 stream studies in 33 watersheds and 5 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies. DNR staff synthesize and deliver this information to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and local government and community partners to help inform key stages of the WRAPS process – from sample site selection early in the process to stressor identification to identifying and targeting implementation strategies. For example the MPCA uses some of this information to help identify and locate sources of pollution and refine watershed models used to calculate pollutant loads. When a watershed reaches the strategy development stage of the WRAPS process DNR regional staff use information they gathered and analyzed earlier in the process to help partners identify and develop multiple-benefit strategies that address the root causes of pollution problems. In FY17 they helped WRAPS partners identify these types of strategies in 40 watersheds. ",,,,1450406,209455,,16.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2016,1624000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY16 the DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY15. We will continue to participate in multi-agency partnerships to improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally we will participate in multi-agency review of state grants for Clean Water Funded work.","In FY16 DNR field staff continued to provide information and analysis to state and local agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Staff gathered and analyzed data for 55 major watersheds. This included more than 200 studies involving field surveys and analysis of hydrology stream stability and/or culvert inventory data. It also included assistance with 23 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies. The resulting information helps the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) identify and locate sources of pollution and develop and improve watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. The information contributed by the DNR also helps provide a foundation for identifying and targeting restoration and protection strategies and actions. In FY16 DNR field staff helped state and local partners identify and develop restoration and protection strategies in 39 watersheds. Our participation helps teams identify strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide multiple environmental benefits. As in previous years DNR staff participated in the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources’ multi-agency review of Clean Water Fund competitive grant proposals for water quality implementation projects by local governments and community partners. ",,,,1708915,205194,,18.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2015,1591245,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY 15 the DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and clean water restoration and protection strategies. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY14. DNR staff will continue to participate in multi-agency partnerships to improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of state grants for Clean Water Funded work.","In FY15 DNR hydrologists and clean water specialists provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. The DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. This provides a foundation for targeting water quality restoration and protection work. We gathered and analyzed existing data for 57 to provide information that enhances our understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. The data and analysis also provides a foundation for targeting restoration and protection efforts. This work included 161 stream geomorphology and hydrology field surveys. We also assisted with 18 TMDL studies. The DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 45 watersheds. Our participation helps teams identify strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of 100 state Clean Water Fund grant proposals for water quality projects that are administered by the Board of Water and Soil Resources.",,,,1414231,227305,,16.3,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2014,1750000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY 14 DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. Work will be a continuation of the outcomes stated for FY13. DNR staff will continue to participate in multi-agency partnerships to improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of applications for Clean Water Fund implementation grants.","In FY14 DNR staff provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. This provides a foundation for targeting water quality restoration and protection work. Field staff gathered and analyzed information in 34 watersheds and conducted 211 studies of stream geomorphology and hydrology plus a detailed study of proper culvert design for stream stability. This information results in improved models and enhanced understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 37 major watersheds and 30 TMDL studies not associated with a major watershed project. DNR’s participation results in strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of over 180 state Clean Water Fund grant proposals for water quality projects.",,,,1287551,255250,,15.6,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2013,1630000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY 13 DNR will continue to work with state and local partners providing information and analysis to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. This work includes the following tasks: 1)Gathering analyzing and sharing existing information. DNR has a wealth of information on stream flows water levels climatology fisheries habitats rare species watershed boundaries and more which is used in planning watershed assessments identifying pollution types and sources and developing watershed protection and restoration strategies that provide clean water and other ecological benefits. 2)Conducting technical watershed studies. This is generally field reconnaissance and collecting data about stream features (width depth bank erosion) that helps scientists develop computer models to predict pollution sources and amounts as well as inform findings about the causes of water impairments and the best approaches for watershed restoration. The stream measurements - known as stream geomorphology - are also being used in more detailed studies of sediment movement in watersheds and floodplain mapping and analysis. 3)Developing Major Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. With agency and local partners DNR staff will participate in a process that uses model results data synthesis local input and professional knowledge to recommend protection and restoration options that will be implemented locally for a given major watershed. DNR staff will also participate in multi-agency partnerships to continually improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of state and federal grants for Clean Water work.","In FY13 DNR staff provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. The result is a foundation for targeting of water quality restoration and protection work. Field staff gathered and analyzed information in 30 watersheds and conducted 113 geomorphology studies plus a detailed study of proper culvert design for stream stability. This information results in improved models and enhanced understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 23 major watersheds and 17 TMDL studies not associated with a major watershed project. DNR’s participation results in strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of over 162 state Clean Water Fund grant proposals for water quality projects.",,,,995643,176930,,11.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2012,1630000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY 12 DNR will continue to partner with federal and state agencies as well as local communities to provide technical assistance to development of clean water restoration and protection strategies. This work includes the following tasks: 1) Gathering analyzing and sharing existing information. DNR has a wealth of information on stream flows water levels climatology fisheries habitats rare species watershed boundaries and more which is used in planning watershed assessments identifying pollution types and sources and developing watershed protection and restoration strategies that provide clean water and other ecological benefits. 2) Conducting technical watershed studies. This is generally field reconnaissance and collecting data about stream features (width depth bank erosion) that helps scientists develop computer models to predict pollution sources and amounts as well as inform findings about the causes of water impairments and the best approaches for watershed restoration. The stream measurements - known as stream geomorphology - are also being used in more detailed studies of sediment movement in watersheds. 3) Developing Major Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. With agency and local partners DNR staff will participate in a process that uses model results data synthesis local input and professional knowledge to recommend protection and restoration options that will be implemented locally for a given major watershed. DNR staff will also participate in multi-agency partnerships to continually improve the process of assessing watersheds and recommending watershed restoration and protection strategies. Finally DNR staff will participate in multi-agency review of state and federal grants for Clean Water work. ","In FY12 DNR staff provided information and analysis to local and state agencies to identify pollution problems and develop clean water restoration and protection strategies. DNR’s data and expertise in stream and lake biology geomorphology and hydrology are instrumental in identifying and locating sources of pollution and developing watershed models for calculating pollutant loads. The result is a foundation for targeting of water quality restoration and protection work. Field staff gathered and analyzed information in 18 watersheds and conducted 30 geomorphology studies. This information results in improved models and enhanced understanding of how water and pollutants move through watersheds. DNR participated with interagency teams to develop watershed restoration and protection strategies in 30 major watersheds and 36 TMDL studies not associated with a major watershed project. DNR’s participation results in strategies that target the root causes of pollution problems and provide clean water and other ecosystem benefits. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review of over 200 state Clean Water Fund grants for water quality projects.",,,,846187,337915,,9.0,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2011,1182500,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY11 DNR will work with state and local partners to provide technical assistance for development of clean water restoration and protection strategies. The number of watershed strategies being developed are decreasing as MPCA has moved to larger scale watershed projects. However the quality and depth of the technical assistance will increase and will result in more detailed and prioritized plans. ","In FY11 DNR provided technical assistance to 52 clean water strategy efforts. This assistance included participation in pollution studies focused on impaired lakes and river reaches as well as larger watershed-scale Major Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies. This technical assistance consisted of collaboration with state and local agencies in study and planning sessions designing and conducting field reconnaissance work on fish passage geomorphology stressor identification and Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) to review enhance or guide the design of watershed studies and restoration options. DNR staff also participated in multi-agency review and evaluation of 184 grant proposals for 3 grant funding sources (Clean Water Partnership Nonpoint Source Grant and Clean Water Fund) and did technical reviews on 41 other clean water studies or plans.",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 3620,"Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies (formerly ""Regional Technical Assistance and Statewide Coordination"")",2010,689000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY10 DNR will work with state and local partners to provide technical assistance for development or implementation of clean water restoration and protection strategies.","In FY10 DNR provided technical assistance to 63 TMDL (Total Maxiumum Daily Load) or watershed planning efforts. This assistance included: - work on over 20 technical studies by assisting in design and conducting field reconnaissance work on fish passage geomorphology stressor identification and Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) to review enhance or guide the design of TMDL studies and restoration options. - review and evaluation of 50 Clean Water Partnership 122 Nonpoint Source Grant and 318 Clean Water Fund Grant proposals.",,,,,,,,,,"DNR regional clean water specialists and area hydrologists work with regional staff from other state agencies and with local partners to help identify the causes of pollution problems and determine the best strategies for fixing them. We collect and analyze stream channel stability and streambank erosion data to help identify root causes of certain water quality impairments in streams. We analyze stream flow, precipitation and climate data to evaluate and quantify changes in watershed hydrology and related impacts on flooding, stream stability and the health of plant, fish and other life in and around streams. We study lake hydrology to help address shoreland erosion and related impacts on habitat, recreation and infrastructure. Information from these studies helps point to enduring, multiple-benefit solutions to water quality and erosion problems. ","Minnesota's state and local agencies work together to measure the health of the state's waters and to develop restoration plans for polluted waters and protection plans for healthy waters. In order to select the protection and restoration practices that will be the best investment for clean water, local resource managers need a robust understanding of how streams and lakes interact with the land that drains to them and how climate and land use impact water health. DNR specialists help bridge gaps in understanding watersheds and specialized aspects of stream and lake ecosystems. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Barbara,Weisman,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","500 Lafayette Road","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 259-5147",Barbara.Weisman@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Modeling, Planning, Preservation, Research, Restoration/Enhancement, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-restoration-and-protection-strategies-formerly-regional-technical-assistance-and,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2025,500000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. ","The WHAF website will be reorganized for consistent language, conceptual alignment and improved navigation to the WHAF Suite of Applications. Steps to migrate the WHAF: Explorer application to an updated IT infrastructure will continue with assistance from MNIT staff. Health scores and data layers in WHAF: Explorer will be updated to deliver the latest land cover and impairment data. WHAF research staff will coordinate with MPCA to deliver annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer and Impaired Waters data. WHAF: Lakes will be updated annually to align with data collection and analysis updates by the DNR Lake Ecology Unit. The updated Climate Normals and Departure data calculated by WHAF staff will be delivered in the WHAF: Explorer and the data will be publicly available for download from the Minnesota Geospatial Commons. Additional data layers showing restoration management actions will be added to the WHAF: Explorer. Other data layers will be evaluated for addition when requested by partner agencies and organizations. Additional priority Watershed Health Scores will be updated with best available data and best science approach. The calculation process will be scripted for repeatability. Online documentation for health scores will be updated to align with new scoring analyses. WHAF Major Watershed Reports will be prioritized for revision and new interactive delivery options considered. The WHAF team will publish a chapter in the science book series, ‘Smart Technology for Water Resources’ to document the WHAF approach and share technical details with partners and other audiences. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will continue to build support for the use of the WHAF Suite of Applications. Quarterly newsletter will continue to provide updates on advancements in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework to nearly 7000 subscribers.        ",,,,,,,,,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2024,500000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(d)","$2,150,000 the first year and $2,150,000 the second year are for developing targeted, science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies and for technical assistance for local governments. ","In FY24, MNIT will hire a new programmer and the WHAF Team will begin updating the WHAF Map application to align with new data storage and delivery protocols. New analysis features and functions will be incorporated into the map application. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to annually deliver an update to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer.  Health scores and data layers derived from the latest National Land Cover Data release will be updated. GIS staff will support DNR efforts to deliver analyzed Climate Projection data and update Groundwater Areas of Concern for water availability. Priority Watershed Health Scores will be updated to new watershed boundaries. Data layers showing implemented management actions will be added and other data layers will be evaluated for addition when requested by partner agencies and organizations. Online documentation for health scores will be updated to align with new scoring analyses. WHAF analyses and reports will be prioritized for revision based on the updated Watershed Boundary data set. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will continue to build support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. Quarterly newsletter will continue to provide updates on advancements in the Watershed Health Assessment Framework. ","In FY24, MNIT hired a new WHAF application developer, and the project staff began updating the WHAF data infrastructure to align with new data storage and delivery protocols. Some health score calculations were updated to incorporate new input data and to automate score generation for moving health scores to new watershed boundary data. Health scores, data layers and the WHAF: Land Cover application was updated to align with the latest National Land Cover Data and Cropland Data releases. WHAF research staff summarized historic climate data to provide an updated 30-year climate ‘normal’ and departures from historic patterns for temperature, annual and seasonal precipitation. WHAF research staff coordinated with MPCA to deliver the annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer and to deliver MPCA 2024 impairment/assessments data. Staff participated in analyses for ground water availability and helped expand reporting of stream restoration projects. The WHAF: Explorer map delivered 180 data layers including 3 new data layers showing implemented management actions, as well as a suite of 41 health scores online and an additional 36 scores available for download. In FY24, WHAF staff enhanced the WHAF: Lakes application improving the way that it shares lake health data, health scores and grades for 3,000 lakes. The new application continued to drive additional online users with annual use of WHAF applications reaching more than 34,000 sessions. WHAF training and support was provided upon request by agency partners, including presentations to Clean Water staff at DNR and MPCA, as well as direct inquiries from individual users. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to more than 6400 subscribers. Online documentation for health scores was updated to align with new scoring analyses and web navigation was improved.   ",,,,253145,43125,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2023,465000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY23 DNR will continue to enhance the WHAF 2.0 Map and will also publish the WHAF for Lakes map application. New data layers will be added to the map when it advances watershed understanding and builds our partnership with other organizations and agencies. Data regarding the implementation of management actions will be evaluated for inclusion in the WHAF. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to annually deliver an update to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. WHAF staff will coordinate with MPCA to explore prioritization methods and delivery options for nutrient reduction strategies. The suite of WHAF Health Scores will be reviewed and prioritized for updating. Priority Health Score updates will be implemented and supporting online documentation will be updated. WHAF analysis and reporting products will be prioritized for revision based on the updated Watershed Boundary data set (anticipated, FY 23). Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. "," In FY23 DNR completed and delivered the WHAF for Lakes application that shares lake health data, health scores, health grades, and a scalable map for 3,000 lakes. The new application brought 2,500 online users in one month and increased annual use of WHAF applications to nearly 20,000 sessions. GIS staff coordinated with MPCA to deliver the annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. Map data layers were added or updated as requested, with a total of 201 layers now available. WHAF staff reviewed final changes to the pending watershed boundary data update. WHAF training and support was provided upon request by agency partners, including presentations to Clean Water staff at DNR, MPCA and BWSR, as well as direct inquiries from individual users. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to 5500 subscribers.   ",,,,292038,46891,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2022,460000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY22 DNR will enhance WHAF 2.0 with additional analytic tools. New data layers will be added to the map when it advances watershed understanding and builds our partnership with other organizations and agencies. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to annually deliver new streams added to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. The project with the Lake Ecology Unit will develop summary charts that deliver key lake conditions within a watershed context. Additional user guidance with applied examples will be delivered. WHAF will begin steps to adjust health scores watershed reports and analysis to reflect the new watershed boundaries scheduled to be published in 2022. Analysis of climate projection data will be coordinated with Minnesota State Climatology office. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. ","In FY22 DNR enhanced the WHAF Map with new data including the Stream Gage network. GIS staff coordinated with MPCA to deliver the annual updates to the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. User support added 14 new Use Examples and improved Map Help. The WHAF for Lakes project was coordinated with the Lake Ecology Unit to prepare a suite of lakes data and data summaries, including a Lake Health Score. Lake clarity data was acquired from the U of MN and a draft application to deliver the Lakes data was completed. WHAF staff prepared data products for the anticipated watershed boundary data update (boundary data publication delayed until FY23). The WHAF online application had 4500 users access the platform 6500 times. WHAF training and support was provided remotely upon request by DNR and agency partners, including the seventh year of U of MN classroom support and a joint training with MN Dept. of Health on drinking water risks. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to 4900 subscribers. Two WHAF Team positions were filled after long vacancies, impacting accomplishments in FY22. ",,,,311468,24693,,1.36,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2021,425000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY21 DNR will enhance WHAF version 2.0 with additional analytic tools. New data layers will be added to the map when it advances watershed understanding and builds our partnership with other organizations and agencies. GIS staff will coordinate with MPCA to double the number of streams included in the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. The historic land use analysis will be delivered as interactive land use charts at different watershed scales. Data analysis to summarize and deliver charts of wetland and lake conditions will be developed. Additional user guidance with applied examples will be delivered. WHAF products will sync to the new watershed boundary dataset when that data is published. Analysis of climate projection data will be coordinated with Minnesota State Climatology office. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. ","In FY21 the DNR enhanced WHAF 2.0 with additional analytic tools and data including links to stream and groundwater monitoring networks and 'change over time' for three health scores. GIS staff coordinated with MPCA to double the number of streams in the Stream Protection Priorities data layer. The Land Use application was added to deliver current and historic land use cropping and water use as interactive charts at different watershed scales. The WHAF online application had 5000 users access the platform 7300 times. Additional user guidance and applied use examples were added to the WHAF map and the WHAF website. A project with the Lake Ecology Unit was initiated to deliver summary charts of lake conditions within a watershed context. WHAF training and support was provided remotely upon request by DNR staff and agency partners including University of Minnesota classroom support for the sixth consecutive year. Additional outreach included a quarterly newsletter sent to 4100 subscribers. ",,,,393883,55386,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2020,421185,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1900000 the first year and $1900000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies. ","In FY20 DNR will enhance WHAF version 2.0 with additional tools; advanced location searches map sharing and use guides with applied examples. A tool will be developed to deliver interactive land use charts at different watershed scales. The programming code will be designed as a template for future tools. WHAF products will be prepared to sync with the new watershed boundary dataset when that data is published. Additional data for forest harvest and lake conditions will be added to the WHAF map. Analysis of climate projection data will be coordinated with Minnesota State Climatology office. Training will be provided for DNR and agency partners and outreach opportunities will be utilized for building additional support for the use of the WHAF map and tools. ","In FY20 the DNR enhanced the WHAF Map version 2.0 with improved location searches map sharing and watershed size at all spatial scales. The map delivers more than 180 GIS data layers. WHAF staff added 10 new data layers to the map including forest harvest lake conditions climate departures and drinking water concerns. A Map Tool Reference Guide and Map Process Guide were added to support users. A special IT project to analyze historic land use data was completed. WHAF products are prepared to sync with the new watershed boundary dataset when that data is published. Analysis of climate projection data was postponed pending additional data analysis by the Minnesota State Climatology office. WHAF training and support was provided remotely when request by DNR staff and agency partners. Quarterly newsletters were sent to 3200 subscribers that use the WHAF map and tools. ",,,,380165,44986,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2019,336306,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY19 DNR will complete the transition to version 2.0 of the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) interactive web map. The watershed health scores website and map will be synced to match updated watershed boundaries. The 80 watershed health report cards will be updated and delivered online. Staff will complete four special projects: A project with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to prioritize streams for protection with the results delivered in the WHAF; A decision support tool in the WHAF to help DNR staff and local partners prioritize and target more intensive stream erosion studies; Integrating more groundwater and drinking water data in WHAF in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Health; and collaborating with the State Climatology Office to determine appropriate climate change data to deliver in the WHAF. Staff will continue to support WHAF users via direct email trainings and presentations; and a quarterly newsletter.","In FY19 the DNR transitioned to version 2.0 of the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) interactive web map. Preliminary work to incorporate new watershed boundaries was completed additional work to sync products will occur when the watershed boundary dataset is published by MNIT. Other updates to WHAF website content were completed and included accessibility compliance. WHAF staff worked with interagency partners on several projects. DNR-MPCA Stream Protection Priorities were published and updated in the WHAF Map; a ‘Target’ tool was added to prioritize stream erosion studies; the State Climatology Office and WHAF staff coordinated to publish 81 Climate Summary reports for each major watershed and one statewide report. Each report summarizes the historic climate record for precipitation and temperature (1895-2018). New data was added to the WHAF online map including MPCA 2018 water quality impairments; MDH data related to drinking water; Bonanza Valley Groundwater Management Area project data; and climate trend data. WHAF staff provided direct user support trainings presentations and a quarterly newsletter reaching 2800 subscribers.",,,,322267,43667,,2,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2018,318607,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1886000 the first year and $1886000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY18 Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) staff will update and re-organize the WHAF website for a more intuitive user experience and to meet accessibility requirements. We will update WHAF Watershed Context Reports for all major watersheds and deliver them online. We will recalculate all average WHAF health index scores and update biology health scores. We will continue to coordinate on water quality analyses with the MN Pollution Control Agency and finalize our work on protection strategies for streams. We will develop and test the new WHAF 2.0 map application. We will update user support materials to reflect changes to the WHAF map. We will add modules for the Decision Support System to the WHAF 2.0 map. We will add WHAF use cases and user guidance documents. We will continue to assist Clean Water Fund-supported staff through training and outreach events. The interagency WHAF cohort group formed in FY17 will meet up to three times in FY18. We will continue publishing a quarterly WHAF Newsletter to support our growing subscriber list of public and private partners. ","In FY18 DNR reorganized the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) website to improve the user experience and accessibility. WHAF 2.0 has new tools including one-click watershed delineation updated land cover charts and the ability to quickly see watershed health scores for any location. The 80 major watershed context reports were updated for accessibility and posted online. Six combined health scores were updated and a new score was added for ‘Steep Slopes near Streams.’ Coordination with MPCA allowed delivery of 2018 water quality impairment and assessment data and development of an interagency process to prioritize streams for protection. WHAF staff supported users with five training and outreach events collected feedback and responded to many requests for technical assistance. Staff continued publishing a quarterly newsletter with more than 2 400 public and private sector subscribers.",,,,297495,21112,,2.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2017,301962,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY17 we will continue to update health index scores to incorporate new data. Updates are planned for the Terrestrial Habitat Quality Groundwater Contamination Susceptibility and Species Richness health scores. We will coordinate with DNR Climate Change staff to add new data for climate vulnerability work. We will coordinate with MPCA to share water quality data and model results in the WHAF map. We will enhance the WHAF map to include saving and printing of individual health explorations. We will support agency staff working on WRAPS and 1W1P as requested. The WHAF will provide inputs for standard deliverables as part of a larger DNR effort to support WRAPS development. We will continue to bring additional modules of the Decision Support System online including guides for users as they evaluate watershed health and analyze trade-offs for decision making. We will continue to develop products that build a shared understanding of watershed health concepts including: updating and expanding three to five WHAF web pages with new content; training other DNR staff and key audiences; and publishing a quarterly WHAF newsletter to communicate with a growing user base.","In FY17 WHAF staff updated several health index scores and revised the Groundwater Susceptibility index using new groundwater data. Staff continued on biology health scores and climate change and made the MN Wildlife Action Plan available in online maps. They coordinated with the MN Pollution Control Agency to provide GIS analysis of watershed characteristics for a nutrient study and prioritization of streams for the Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies process. They developed and distributed to DNR staff a GIS toolbox for custom land cover charts. Staff created a web platform that allows advanced WHAF users to view the statistical relationship between WHAF health scores and the quality of aquatic communities in Minnesota streams. A new web programmer on the WHAF staff improved map functions compliance with accessibility requirements and guidelines and the overall stability of the application. Upgraded LiDAR-based topography was added to the online map. Staff developed and tested additional modules of the WHAF Decision Support System including beta testing of an online interface. Staff provided support to WHAF users by presenting at 10 training and outreach events and with one-on-one assistance. One training session was attended by 15 Clean Water Fund-supported staff from multiple state agencies. We formed a cohort of Clean Water Fund-supported staff from three agencies to guide WHAF development. We developed a story map explaining watershed concepts. We reorganized and updated content and navigation for our web pages to be implemented in FY18. We continued to publish a quarterly WHAF newsletter to communicate with 1 900 subscribers.",,,,271849,30086,,2.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2016,316000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","(d) $1940000 the first year and $1940000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies.","In FY16 we will continue to refine and expand the suite of health index scores: update the non-point source and water quality assessments indices; add a metric of phosphorus risk; update the stream species index with current MPCA data; and calculate index trends over time. We will publish watershed health report cards for the 81 major watersheds. We will enhance the online WHAF site and map application with new functions to include: access to major watershed health report cards; health score trends over time; user selected health score comparisons; user map views that can be stored and shared; and watershed ecological context reports. We will work directly with DNR and MPCA staff working on WRAPS and watershed plans as requested and the WHAF will be used to provide inputs for standard deliverables as part of a larger DNR effort to systematically support WRAPS development. We will make the online Decision Support System live including guides that will walk users through an analysis of watershed health and provide a framework for decision making. We continue developing products that build a shared understanding of watershed health including: updating and expanding three to five WHAF web pages with new content; training other DNR staff and key audiences; and publishing a quarterly WHAF newsletter to communicate with a growing user base. ","In FY16 we refined and expanded the suite of health index scores. The work included updates to: Non-Point Source Index and Metric of Phosphorus Risk; Localized Pollution Source Index and six Pollution Metric Scores; Water Quality Assessment Index; Stream Species Quality Index and Metrics for Fish Macroinvertebrates and Mussels; Loss of Hydrologic Storage Index and Loss of Wetland Storage Metric. We provided access to GIS data layers related to each health score. We published watershed health report cards and ecological context reports for Minnesota’s 81 major watersheds. We enhanced the WHAF map so users can store and share map views and create a slideshow of maps. We worked with DNR and MPCA staff on WRAPS protection strategies and 1W1P pilot projects as requested. We participated in development of standard deliverables as part of a DNR effort to support WRAPS development. We enhanced watershed specific information such as land use summaries google earth flyovers and health summaries including expanded guidance to assist users. We completed a beta version of an online Decision Support System available for preliminary use by DNR staff. Three modules of the DSS will move to the WHAF website in FY17 based on hiring a new web programmer. Additional DSS modules will continue in development in FY17 to facilitate input and review by Subject Matter Experts. We continued developing products that build a shared understanding of watershed health including expanded WHAF web content; training other DNR staff and key audiences; and published a quarterly WHAF newsletter for our subscriber list of more than 1400 users.",,,,201865,24165,,2.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2015,258755,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY15 the WHAF team will review all 18 of the WHAF Health index scores add at least two new indices and update four to six indices using new data. Trends in health over time will be generated at the watershed and catchment scale and a web-based delivery mechanism will be designed. A decision support system for applying the Watershed Health Assessment Framework by diverse resource managers will be delivered online. Ongoing direct outreach using the WHAF to support clean water work by the DNR and agency partners will continue. WHAF program staff will coordinate with Information Technology staff to deliver updated watershed health information when new input data becomes available.","In FY15 the WHAF team added five new index scores in the water quality component ad updated five watershed health index scores with new data and improved analysis. We made index updates available to the public through the WHAF online map. The updated index scores are also available as GIS data directly for use by DNR staff and for the public via download from MN Geospatial Commons. We calculated trends over time for land use and crop trends over time (2001 2006 and 2011) and designed a way to show those trends for any watershed the user selects. The trend data is also available for download from the MN Geospatial Commons. We re-designed the WHAF online map to improve the user interface and to add new features including buttons for navigating between watershed scales. We created narrated instructional videos and other guides to help WHAF users tap into the WHAF’s new features. We also started a WHAF newsletter which now has over 1000 subscribers. We designed a preliminary Decision Support System (DSS) which is not yet ready to go online. Some products that support the DSS (including the land use summary charts and enhanced access to additional data and web services) have been developed and are available now. Members of our team took training on Structured Decision Making which provides a framework for designing the DSS. This training slowed our delivery timeline but will make the final product more rigorous and consistent. We directly supported WRAPS work by the DNR and our agency partners and the WHAF was used without direct support in a number of WRAPS – one example is DNR and MPCA staff involved in Stressor ID using the WHAF together to diagnose problems where the fish community indicates poor stream health. We also helped DNR staff use WHAF for One Watershed One Plan pilot planning efforts in the North Fork Crow River Yellow Medicine and Root River watersheds.",,,,226481,1220,,1.8,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2014,100000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1850000 the first year and $1850000 the second year are for developing targeted science-based watershed restoration and protection strategies including regional technical assistance for TMDL plans and development of a watershed assessment tool in cooperation with the commissioner of the Pollution Control Agency. By January 15 2016 the commissioner shall submit a report to the chairs and ranking minority members of the senate and house of representatives committees and divisions with jurisdiction over environment and natural resources policy and finance providing the outcomes to lakes rivers streams and groundwater achieved with this appropriation and recommendations. ","In FY14 new outreach tools will help users apply health index scores and principles to planning and decision making. Explanatory video text and graphics will explain healthy watershed principles at multiple scales. Outreach materials will be available to help users apply health assessments at various scales from statewide to major river basin major watershed and local projects. Health trend data will be developed for several health indices to show changes in the health of Minnesota’s watersheds over time. Staff will participate directly with DNR and PCA staff in applying healthy watershed principles for 3 to 5 projects.","In FY14 the Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) online web application was introduced to diverse citizen and agency audiences. This resulted in the WHAF being used for: training of civic leaders involved in watershed issues; internal DNR projects and processes; coordination with MPCA and other agency partners; and reporting watershed health status by a variety of agency and citizen watershed organizations. Resources were added to the WHAF website to ensure ease of use. Instructional videos were posted at http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/whaf/explore/index.html to help users apply health assessments at various scales from statewide to major river basin major watershed and local projects. Staff started updating health scores based on the new (2011) National Land Cover Data. Changes in health scores over time are currently in review and developers are working on delivering health trends through the web application. Three additional health indices were downscaled and/or improved in FY 14 including Hydrologic Storage Terrestrial Habitat Quality and Stream Species Quality. Staff worked with MPCA to apply healthy watershed principles to stressor identification reports Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategies DNR planning processes (Groundwater Management Areas Parks and Trails Whitewater Watershed Learning Center Park Plan Update Process) and water quality work for the Snake River Pomme de Terre Lower Minnesota River and Pine River watersheds.",,,,81502,1219,,1.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2013,100000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY 13 DNR will deliver Watershed Health Assessment scores and to a smaller watershed (catchment) scale to support the exploration of watershed systems at more local level. Guidance Documents will lead users through a consistent approach for applying Watershed Health Assessment Framework products. A new web interface is in development that will enhance the exploration of complex systems information for resource managers and interested citizens.","In FY 13 half of the watershed health index scores (9 of 18) were calculated statewide to the subwatershed (catchment) scale providing health scores for more than 10 000 individual catchments. A newly designed web interface released at the end of the FY13 allows users to explore health assessment scores and 30 additional GIS data layers at multiple scales. An additional online tool uses MN DNR watershed delineations to instantly identify the upstream area for a selected catchment providing summary information about land use in the upstream area. The WHAF team also completed new health assessment work using data collected by MN DNR Statewide Mussel Survey MPCA Stream Survey IBI Data State Water Use Data and USGS Stream Flow Data.",,,,144058,924,,1.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2012,100000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(d)","$1730000 the first year and $1730000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved impaired waters list in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D and for development of a watershed assessment tool.","In FY12 DNR will deliver a Decision Support Tool to assist managers in applying the watershed health scores to strategic planning and decision making. The GIS Data used for health scores will be readily available to users. Innovative outreach products will bring a systems perspective to a broad audience. Data access will improve the coordination of efforts to improve watershed health. ","In FY12 DNR completed web delivery of Watershed Health Assessment scores and explanatory text. The Watershed Health Assessment Framework was delivered in a series of workshops to assist DNR managers in applying the watershed health scores to strategic planning and decision making. The GIS Data used for health scores is readily available to users. Innovative outreach products are in development that will bring a systems perspective to a broad audience. Data access will improve the coordination of efforts to improve watershed health.",,,,74542,21159,,1.0,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2011,118000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY 11 DNR will deliver Watershed Health Scores for all 81 major watersheds available through the DNR website including a map interface for scores supporting explanatory text and downloadable products. Products will inform managers and citizens using a systems framework to compare watershed health across Minnesota.","In FY 11 DNR delivered Watershed Health Scores for all 81 major watersheds on the DNR website. A map interface supporting explanatory text and downloadable products are available to managers and citizens. The WAT is being used by resource managers and others to apply an ecological systems approach to understand and address health challenges in our watersheds.",,,,,,,,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25358,"Watershed Health Assessment Framework",2010,110500,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(c)","$1050000 the first year and $1050000 the second year are for TMDL development and TMDL implementation plans for waters listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency approved Impaired Waters List in accordance with Minnesota Statutes chapter 114D.","In FY10 DNR will develop health scores for all 81 major watersheds in Minnesota web-based delivery and interpretation of scores 5 year cycle of score generation for monitoring trends implementation plans based on scoring.","In FY 10 DNR completed health scores for all major watersheds. The scores were prepared for release and a basic web map interface was completed. Project staff also drafted text for the Watershed Assessment Tool website and compiled an extensive literature review and supporting documentation in a database.",,,,,,,,,,"The Watershed Health Assessment Framework (WHAF) is a web-based tool for resource managers and others interested in the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. The framework uses five ecological components to organize and deliver information about watershed health conditions in Minnesota. The five components are hydrology, connectivity, biology, geomorphology, and water quality. Statewide GIS data from DNR and partner agencies are used to calculate health scores that reveal similarities and differences between watersheds. Patterns at the major watershed and sub-watershed (catchment) scale help resource managers identify vulnerabilities and target efforts for the greatest benefit. The WHAF website provides details about each health score and key concepts for understanding watershed systems. The WHAF Watershed Map makes complex issues easier to visualize. Developed in 2012, this interactive map now delivers 41 health scores organized by the five components of watershed health, together with over 200 related data layers. A matrix tool summarizes the health scores as an interactive table, and a land cover tool summarizes landscape and water use change over time.The WHAF also delivers downloadable Major Watershed reports; the Watershed Context Report, Watershed Climate Summary, and Watershed Health Report Card. The Stream Protection Priorities for WRAPS data layer (an interagency product) is now updated annually in the WHAF Map. A new WHAF for Lakes application provides health scores, maps, and data summaries for different aspects of lake health. WHAF trainings, presentations, online use guides and a quarterly newsletter support those working in the evolving field of watershed science. WHAF Watershed Health Scores and WHAF Lake Health Scores are also available through Minnesota's GeoCommons for use in GIS analysis. ","The DNR and agency partners have been charged with creating Healthier Watersheds for Minnesota. The Watershed Health Assessment Famework (WHAF) creates health scores that compare the ecological health of Minnesota's watersheds. This baseline assessment is important for organizing efforts to improve the ecological health of Minnesota. Following health trends over time will help managers adapt to the complex ecological relationships that interact to create healthy watersheds. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Beth,Knudsen,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","801 South Oak Street","Lake City, MN",MN,55041,651-299-4022,beth.knudsen@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Monitoring, Planning","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-health-assessment-framework-0,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2025,350000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(g)","$650,000 the first year and $650,000 the second year are for applied research and tools, including maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries, streams, and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data and for assessing the effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY25 MNIT staff at DNR EWR will continue their stewardship role for Minnesota’s authoritative lidar data and watershed data, which will include: Continuing research and development on Minnesota’s new second generation, high-density lidar data. Working with the Minnesota Geospatial Information Office (MnGeo) to develop a hierarchical and seamless statewide data architecture that will provide organized data management of the new lidar and efficient dissemination of products to the public. Creation of new workflows for development of official lidar- derived 3D digital elevation products.  Key products from this work will include digital elevation models (DEM), topographic contours, and high-density Hydrographic Position Index (HPI).  These data products will serve watershed modeling needs such as hydro-terrain and landscape applications, hydraulic and hydrologic design projects, and flood prediction and reduction models. Watershed delineation updates using lidar-derived data. Ongoing collaboration and development of digital dam breachline datasets.  This work consists of management of existing data and creating new breachlines where the data doesn’t exist.   Collaboration with agencies and committees at the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR), DNR, MPCA, U.S. Geological Survey, and the Geospatial Advisory Council.   Continued leadership of 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo), 3DGeo Workgroups, and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. MNIT staff at DNR EWR will also continue to provide subject matter expertise in research and development of foundational digital hydrography data products and applications of the data for government agencies, watershed partners, and public end users.  The focus of this work will be lidar-derived hydrography.  These data are used in water quality and quantity projects to promote watershed health, landscape resiliency, environmental planning and decision making, and hydrologic modeling across Minnesota.   ",,,,,,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2024,350000,"M.L. 2023, Ch. 40, Article 2, Section 5(g)","$650,000 the first year and $650,000 the second year are for applied research and tools, including maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries, streams, and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data and for assessing the effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY24 MNIT staff at DNR EWR will continue their data stewardship role for Minnesota’s authoritative lidar and watershed data. The updated watershed delineation dataset completed in FY23 will be published for public use as the DNR Watershed Suite. Staff will also publish a report on the results from the FY23 pilot project that explored the value and efficacy of Clean Water funded digital elevation model (DEM) breachlines in new high-resolution lidar DEMs. Research and development will continue to explore new workflows to create authoritative lidar-derived DEMs, topographic contours, and high-density Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) from new lidar data. DNR MNIT Staff will continue their lidar and watershed collaboration and leadership roles with teams at the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR), DNR EWR, the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) Workgroups, and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. The data stewardship and leadership roles of MNIT staff at DNR EWR provides subject matter expertise in development of foundational data products and application of the data for government agencies, citizens, and other watershed partners. These data are used in water quality and quantity projects to promote watershed health, resilience, and modeling across Minnesota. ","In FY24 MNIT staff at DNR continued their watershed and lidar data stewardship roles. This work included data research and development and stakeholder collaboration.  The staff served as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects with BWSR and DNR EWR. They also served in leadership roles on many teams of the MN Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). This collaborative work ensures watershed and lidar related data meets the needs of federal, state, and local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. MNIT staff at DNR published the updated watershed delineation dataset for public use.  This product known as the DNR Watershed Suite serves as Minnesota’s official watershed map, which serves thousands of watershed projects across the state.  Staff also published a report on the results from the FY23 pilot project that explored the value and efficacy of Clean Water funded Digital Dam Breachline applications in Minnesota’s new high-resolution second generation lidar DEMs.  These results were presented at the annual Esri User Conference in California and the Minnesota GIS/LIS Conference. The 3DGeo Culvert Data Standard Subgroup continued to work and hold quarterly meetings for the establishment of a culvert data standard.  When complete the standard will guide culvert inventories with standardized attributes for systematic data sharing.  DNR MNIT staff continued to provide subject matter expertise in lidar data acquisition and the creation of lidar deliverables such as DEMs, contours, and Hydrographic Position Index (HPI). These authoritative lidar products will serve watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, and One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) programs, hydrologic modeling initiatives, and Clean Water projects.   ",,,,282992,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2023,280000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$535000 the first year and $530000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY23 MNIT staff at DNR will continue the role of stewardship for state lidar data, digital elevation models (DEM), the MnTOPO website, and watershed data. Staff will continue collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR), the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo), and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). The Watershed Delineation dataset will be published for public use following DNR EWR approval of changes that impact authoritative and regulatory applications. The Culvert Data Standard Workgroup will hold a kickoff meeting to launch the team, followed by regular monthly meetings. The Standard will help facilitate Clean Water and hydrologic modeling initiatives. The DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup will continue to develop methodologies and processes related to hydro-modification of high resolution lidar-derived DEMs. The Subgroup will research new techniques and tools for identifying culvert locations and developing new hydrography from DEMs derived from MN’s new high-density lidar. This work will inform MN’s future hydrography development projects as well as the USGS 3D Hydrography program. Staff will collaborate with 3DGeo on implementation of the new statewide Tile Indexing Scheme in support of storage and maintenance of MN’s lidar holdings and dissemination through MNTOPO. The Tile Indexing Scheme will be published to the MN Geospatial Commons. With new lidar data becoming available in FY23 and beyond, MNIT staff will participate in reviewing 3DGeo lidar data deliverables for completeness and identification of concerns. They will serve as subject matter experts in the creation of lidar deliverables such as DEMs, contours, and HPI. The review of these data support research and development of new workflows for integration into software platforms and Clean Water programs. Solutions are being identified, documented, and shared with partners to better assist them with working with these high-density datasets. "," In FY23 MNIT staff at DNR continued their data stewardship roles. This work includes data development and collaboration. The staff served as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects with BWSR and DNR EWR. They also served in leadership roles on many teams of the MN Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). This collaborative work ensures watershed and lidar related data meets the needs of federal, state, and local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. MNIT staff at DNR held several meetings with DNR EWR and other state and federal agency staff to review watershed outlet locations and naming conventions resulting in agency approved authoritative watershed boundaries. The 3DGeo Culvert Data Standard Subgroup held a kickoff meeting to launch this new team and followed that by hosting quarterly meetings. The work on the Culvert Standard is ongoing, when complete it will help facilitate Clean Water and hydrologic modeling initiatives. With guidance and expertise provided by the DNR MNIT staff, the DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup completed the pilot project that reviewed the role of existing data developed with Clean Water Funds for use with new high resolution lidar-derived DEMs. Results were compiled and a report is in development. This work will inform Minnesota’s future hydrography development projects and the USGS 3D Hydrography Program.  DNR MNIT staff continued to provide subject matter expertise in lidar data acquisition and the creation of lidar deliverables such as DEMs, contours, and Hydrographic Position Index (HPI). The 3DGeo Tile Indexing Scheme was implemented into the lidar data and published to the MN Geospatial Commons for public use. These authoritative lidar products will serve watershed restoration and protection strategy (WRAPS) development, and One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) programs. ",,,,294302,7388,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2022,285000,"M.L. 2021 First Special Session Ch. 1 Art. 2 Sec. 5(g)","$535000 the first year and $530000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality. ","In FY22 MNIT staff at DNR will continue their role of stewardship for state lidar data the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff will continue collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. The Watershed Delineation dataset will be published for public use. The initial Culvert Data Standard Workgroup will hold their first meetings. Comprised of interested parties who have current culvert datasets this knowledge base will inform development of the Culvert Data Standard. Metadata and supporting documentation for the DNR Travel Time tool will be completed and the tool will be made available to the public. The DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup will continue to develop methodology and processes related to hydro-modification of high resolution lidar-derived digital elevation models. This research and its practical applications will be documented to inform watershed delineation processes into the future. ","In FY22 MNIT staff at DNR continued collaborating with BWSR as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects, served on the MN Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo), and served lead roles on the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team (DNR GeoWRT). This collaborative work ensures consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Progress was made on the Watershed Boundary Dataset but was not published as planned. MNIT Staff worked with DNR EWR to incorporate and approve updates that impact authoritative and regulatory applications of the dataset. Research and development explored applying new workflows to create high-density Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) from new lidar data. Work continues on establishing the State Culvert Standard and exploring the ability of new lidar to identify culverts. This initiative was strengthened by MNIT staff establishing a Workgroup comprised of members from counties, SWCDs, and state agencies. MNIT staff led the 3DGeo DEM Hydro-modification Subgroup in collection of existing breachline datasets for use in MN’s new high-resolution lidar-derived digital elevation models (DEM).  This assessment determined the effort required to digitize new breachlines or modify existing breachline geometry for proper hydrologic connectivity. Staff also worked with DNR MNIT and BWSR to complete the DNR Travel Time Tool update and published on the MN Geospatial Commons data portal. Staff collaborated with 3DGeo partners to create a new statewide tile indexing scheme for storing, managing, and disseminating lidar data and other geospatial products. Research and development work started on working with new lidar point clouds and high resolution DEM’s. Efficiencies and best practices are being documented and shared with partners to better assist them with working with these high-resolution datasets. ",,,,278558,27041,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2021,285000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY21 MNIT staff at DNR will continue their role of stewardship for state lidar data the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff will continue their cross-agency collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) the Geospatial Advisory Council 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. Additionally staff will be working with DNR on the public release of the updated statewide watershed dataset the first major update release since 2011. A new update to the statewide Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) will also be completed for application in water resource tools and visualization assessments of the landscape. Work will begin on writing Minnesota's geospatial culvert data standard to establish a single commonly accepted set of attribute specifications for transferring and aggregating culvert data in Minnesota for a wide variety of water resource applications. Staff will work with BWSR DNR and 3DGeo on the quality control and assessment of digital dam breachline deliverables provided to the state as part of the Tillage and Erosion Survey Program and the updating of DNR's Digital Elevation Model Travel Time Tool. ","In FY21 MNIT staff at DNR continued collaborating with BWSR as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects served on the Minnesota Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and served lead roles on the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. This collaborative work ensures consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Staff harmonized the federal Watershed Boundary Dataset with DNR Catchment Dataset using the U.S. Geological Survey toolset. Updating existing Hydrographic Position Index (HPI) expanded into research using new lidar data for an updated HPI. Establishing the foundation for a state culvert standard continues current work focused on the ability of new lidar to identify culverts. The quality control of digital dam breachlines started with staff reviewing deliverables for completeness and integration into a digital elevation model that will serve the BWSR Tillage and Erosion Survey Program. Staff also worked with DNR MNIT and BWSR technicians to complete the DNR Travel Time Tool update.",,,,265810,19419,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2020,280000,"M.L. 2019 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$700000 the first year and $700000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY20 MNIT staff at DNR will continue stewardship of state lidar data on the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff will continue their cross-agency collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources two committees of the Geospatial Advisory Council (Standards and 3D Geomatics Committees) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team working towards publication of state watershed culvert and lidar data standards. These standards ensure consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Staff will complete three special projects: release an update to Minnesota’s authoritative watershed datasets; write technical papers to convey new findings and protocols bringing greater consistency to LiDAR digital elevation models and hydrography data products; participate in the 3D Geomatics Committee led effort to write a Lidar Acquisition Plan that strives to bring new high-density lidar to Minnesota. New lidar will enhance Minnesota's existing digital elevation and watershed data for hydro-terrain analysis tools."," In FY20 MNIT staff at DNR continued stewardship of state lidar data on the MnTOPO website and watershed data. Staff continued their cross-agency collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) as subject matter advisors on Clean Water Fund projects served on the Minnesota Geospatial Advisory Council - 3D Geomatics Committee (3DGeo) and served lead roles on the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team. This collaborative work ensures consistent utilization of hydrography related data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. Staff completed the most recent update to Minnesota’s authoritative watershed dataset. 3DGeo Committee contributions include writing a LCCMR proposal for lidar acquisition and DEM hydro-modification completion of writing the Minnesota Lidar Plan and establishment of Minnesota’s first high definition lidar data collection under the state’s Lidar Plan scheduled for spring 2021. This new lidar data will update Minnesota’s existing digital elevation and watershed data. ",,,,261613,21052,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2019,260000,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY19 Minnesota Information Technology (MNIT) staff at the DNR will continue stewardship of state LiDAR (light detection and ranging) on the MnTOPO website and related watershed delineation data. Staff will continue to collaborate with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) and two committees of the Governor’s Geospatial Advisory Council (Standards Committee and 3D Geomatics Committee) toward publication of a state standard to ensure consistent processing of LiDAR digital elevation data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting the implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. The Standards Committee will formally review and publish the standard. Staff will draft technical papers to convey new findings and protocols bringing greater consistency to LiDAR digital elevation models watercourse and watershed hydrography data products. The 3D Geomatics Committee will help disseminate this information to other Minnesota LiDAR and spatial data users. Also in FY19 staff will complete a major watershed delineation update and revision and provide related education and outreach to users.","In FY19 MNIT staff at DNR continued: stewardship of state lidar data on the MnTOPO website and related watershed delineation data; collaboration with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources Minnesota’s Geospatial Advisory Council (Standards Committee and 3D Geomatics Committee) and the DNR Geospatial Water Resource Team; documented protocol for the Watershed Update Project; and assembled digital dam breachline data from state funded projects. This work ensures consistent development and processing of digital elevation models and hydrography data needed by local governments for prioritizing and targeting the implementation projects identified in their watershed management plans. The Watershed Delineation Update project was not completed in FY19 as planned because the project scope expanded; it will be finalized in FY20.",,,,266557,30920,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2018,248238,"M.L. 2017 Regular Session Ch. 91 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; and assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality.","In FY18 Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) staff at the DNR will continue stewardship of Minnesota’s LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and watershed data holdings including making LiDAR data available on the MnTOPO website. Staff plan to publish technical papers finalized in FY17 about standards for hydro-modified digital elevation models (DEMs). Hydro-modified DEMs are needed to run models that help local governments prioritize and target watershed management projects. These efforts will help the DNR and the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) accelerate LiDAR-based data development for local governments engaged in conservation planning and project implementation through the One Watershed One Plan program.","In FY18 Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) staff at the DNR continued stewardship of state LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data accessible on the MnTOPO website and related watershed delineation data. Staff continued collaborating with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) on a state standard for processing LiDAR digital elevation data needed by local governments engaged in watershed planning (One Watershed One Plan) for prioritizing and targeting implementation projects. Staff added key technological advancements and stakeholder feedback to the draft standard but did not publish it in FY18 as planned. ",,,,239009,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2017,223000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY17 Minnesota Information Technology (MNIT) staff at the DNR will continue stewardship of Minnesota’s LiDAR (light detection and ranging) and watershed data holdings. Research and development will continue as staff work toward publishing the digital elevation model (DEM) hydro-modification guidance developed in FY16. This information will continue to support data development for local governments engaged in the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program. Work will continue to focus on conservation planning and targeting tools that require LiDAR-derived DEMs. Technical papers will convey new findings and protocols to bring greater consistency to Minnesota’s authoritative DEM watercourse and watershed hydrography data products. In FY17 the DNR river ecologist will: (1) Continue statistical validation and improvements in the coding and usability of the geographic information system (GIS) tools created for stream type and valley type classification; and (2) Begin developing a GIS layer showing completed of stream and valley type classification. The layer will be limited to places where GIS and field classifications have been compared. The goal will be to expand this layer statewide in the future.","In FY17 Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) staff at the DNR continued stewardship of Minnesota’s watershed boundary and LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data holdings. Staff continued to manage LiDAR data and make it accessible on the MnTOPO website. Staff also collaborated with the MN Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) toward systematic statewide hydro-modification of LiDAR digital elevation models (DEMs). Hydro-modified DEMs are needed to run models that help local governments prioritize and target watershed management projects. Staff finalized technical papers about standards for hydro-modified DEMs. All of these efforts support planning and project implementation by local governments engaged in the One Watershed One Plan program.",,,,388596,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2016,223000,"M.L. 2015 First Special Session Ch. 2 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","(g) $675000 the first year and $675000the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing a biomonitoring database.","In FY16 the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue to coordinate the storage accessibility maintenance and use of LiDAR data and watershed data. Work will result in efficiencies in data use tools and training. A major work product will be example hydro-modified digital elevation models and guidance for developing such models so that work with watershed models at the local level will be done consistently and improvements to the state’s LiDAR-based digital elevation model can be shared and used statewide. The DNR River Ecologist will continue comparing GIS to field classifications of stream types and valley types. When the work is done it will be written up in a technical paper. Once the methods have been accepted as statistically valid staff will work on using the new method to create a GIS layer of stream classifications. The initial GIS layer for stream and valley classifications will likely be limited by location of stream comparison reaches (field and GIS) with plans to expand this layer statewide in the future. ","In FY16 Minnesota Information Technology (MNIT) staff at the DNR continued stewardship of Minnesota’s watershed boundary and LiDAR (light detection and ranging) data holdings. Ongoing LiDAR data management and coordination continued in support of data accessibility for Minnesota. Staff collaborated with the Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources (BWSR) toward systematic statewide hydro-modification of LiDAR digital elevation models (DEMs). Hydro-modified DEMs are needed to run models that help local governments prioritize and target watershed management projects. Four technical papers were written and five projects were developed in support of this work including a study to compare the results of different degrees degree of hydro-modification. All of this information will help BWSR support data development for local governments engaged in the One Watershed One Plan (1W1P) program. Other key work included continued collaboration with the US Geological Survey along Minnesota’s northern boundary to harmonize US and Canadian watershed datasets. This partnership has led to better information for watershed modeling and targeting of locations for best management practices. In FY16 the DNR river ecologist rebuilt a previously developed geographic information system (GIS) tool to help staff classify stream valley types. The new version enables staff to incorporate regionally specific data which will make the tool work better across Minnesota’s many varying landscapes. Improvements were also made in the processing speed and ease of use of the tool. Staff also began work to ensure the tool is statistically valid and began writing a technical paper about the tool.",,,,231928,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2015,190000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY15 the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue to manage the effort of coordinating LiDAR data and watershed data as the LiDAR data steward and watershed data steward respectively. Through this work efficiencies in data utilization tool development and training will facilitate water resource management and Clean Water initiatives across Minnesota. Advancements in MnTOPO including map service updates alternative hill shades for topographic viewing and advanced LiDAR-derived products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape will be coordinated and implemented by the GIS Hydrologist. The DNR River Ecologist will determine final stream type and valley type classifications derived from desktop tools as well as compare field surveyed data to these final classifications. Statistical analysis will be used to determine if there is a significant difference between classifications using both methods.","In FY15 the MNiT@DNR Geographic Information System (GIS) Hydrologist continued to serve as Minnesota’s watershed and LiDAR data steward; we collaborated with USGS to harmonize watershed delineations with Canadian data and the federally managed watershed boundary dataset (WBD). Because of this partnership Minnesota has better information for watershed modeling and targeting locations for best management practices. We continued to coordinate storage and availability of LiDAR data for Minnesota. We finished a new product called hydrographic position index; it is now publicly available for use in GIS. We also crafted a plan to support the Board of Water and Soil Resources with terrain analysis data and the use of the new PTMApp planning tool both of which are being used in One Watershed One Plan pilot programs. The DNR River Ecologist researched GIS techniques to classify stream and valley types. Using Minnesota’s LiDAR data set and other data custom programming tools were developed to automate GIS procedures. Classifications made with the automated system were compared to field-based stream classifications at select locations. The next step in the process is a statistical analysis to see if the GIS method gives similar results to the field-based method.",,,,170155,,,2.0,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2014,190000,"M.L. 2013 Ch. 137 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$675000 the first year and $675000 the second year are for applied research and tools including watershed hydrologic modeling; maintaining and updating spatial data for watershed boundaries streams and water bodies and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data; assessing effectiveness of forestry best management practices for water quality; and developing an ecological monitoring database. ","In FY14 the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue to manage the effort of coordinated LiDAR data and tool development training and its applications for water resource management and Clean Water initiatives. As the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair the DNR GIS Hydrologist will continue developing naming and use standards for LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) data products. For example DNR will establish standards for “hydrologic conditioning” (removal of digital dams) for new high resolution digital elevation models. DNR will also conduct training workshops and webinars related to hydrology and the use of LiDAR information. The DNR GIS Hydrologist will produce and make available advanced spatial analysis tools and products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape. These tools will greatly enhance the ability of local watershed managers to “see” landscape features like steep slopes or drainage pathways allowing much better targeting of conservation practices.","In FY14 the DNR GIS Hydrologist continued to serve as Minnesota’s Watershed Data Steward; the DNR collaborated with USGS to harmonize watershed delineations with Canadian data and the federally managed watershed boundary dataset (WBD). Because of this partnership Minnesota has better spatial information for watershed management activities such as locating water quality practices and watershed modeling. As the MN LiDAR data steward and the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair the DNR GIS Hydrologist continued the work of LiDAR coordination for Minnesota. As part of this responsibility the DNR GIS Hydrologist functioned as the lead coordinator in the published release of the internet portal for viewing and downloading LiDAR data known as MnTOPO. Additionally several outreach and education training sessions were conducted to promote MnTOPO and proper LiDAR data usage. The GIS Hydrologist facilitated the development of the LiDAR naming standards for Minnesota which resulted in the recently completed overhaul of the entire LiDAR dataset. This work also advanced the writing of LiDAR standards by developing new LiDAR terminology for use in Minnesota. The DNR GIS Hydrologist defined a suite of terminology that will guide the development and management of digital elevation models intended for hydrologic and water resource applications. Advanced LiDAR derived products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape were not created because additional staff were not available to complete this work. The DNR River Ecologist began developing a procedure for classifying stream types and valley types in Minnesota using LiDAR data. An outline of the proposed process for GIS classification was developed which details the necessary metrics and protocols. Survey data from the Clean Water Legacy Specialists from each DNR region were gathered for future validation analysis.",,,,149268,,,1.7,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2013,235000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY13 DNR will continue the ongoing work of conducting watershed delineations by request and begin to coordinate the use of LiDAR data for development of the next generation of watershed delineations for Minnesota. The DNR GIS Hydrologist will manage the effort of coordinated LiDAR data development training and its applications for water resource management and Clean Water initiatives as the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair. This LiDAR work will include three LiDAR Hydrology training workshops for outstate-Minnesota over the next year. The DNR will produce advanced LiDAR derived products to identify water conveyance features on the landscape that will facilitate CW initiatives dependent on understanding the hydrology of the landscape. Finally DNR will continue its work with the USGS and Natural Resources Conservation Service and International Joint Commission to harmonize watershed delineations along the Canadian border as watersheds get refined to smaller scales for precision conservation and water resource management.","In FY13 the DNR GIS Hydrologist continued to serve as Minnesota’s Watershed Data Steward; the DNR partnered with USGS NRCS and the International Joint Commission to harmonize watershed delineations with Canadian data more accurately reflecting drainage areas coming from Canada. The result is better spatial information for watershed management activities such as locating water quality practices and watershed modeling. As the Minnesota LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair the DNR GIS Hydrologist coordinated LiDAR data development training and its applications for water resource management across Minnesota. This collaborative work was administered through 12 monthly internet meetings by a team of GIS and LiDAR experts from across the state. Additionally these responsibilities resulted in three LiDAR Hydrology training workshops for outstate-Minnesota and one at the Minnesota GIS/LIS Conference.",,,,99492,24437,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2012,235000,"M.L. 2011 First Special Session Ch. 6 Art. 2 Sec. 6(g)","$1725000 the first year and $1725000 the second year are for shoreland stewardship TMDL implementation coordination providing technical assistance to the Drainage Work Group and Drainage Management Team and maintaining and updating data. Of this amount $235000 each year is for maintaining and updating watershed boundaries and integrating high-resolution digital elevation data with watershed modeling and $40000 each year is for a biomonitoring database. TMDL implementation coordination efforts shall be focused on major watersheds with TMDL implementation plans including forested watersheds.","In FY12 DNR will continue to conduct watershed delineations by request. DNR will broaden the number of people using watershed data and tools for clean water related initiatives. DNR's watershed delineator will continue to update the DNR Catchment data with the last 2 years of tracked changes and coordinate the use of LiDAR data and LiDAR training as the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair. Finally DNR will work with the USGS and Natural Resources Conservation Service and International Joint Commission to harmonize watershed delineation along the Canadian border.","In FY12 DNR GIS Hydrologist Watershed Data Steward completed the delineations of 30 special request watersheds for CW work and hosted the 2012 International Joint Commission’s Transboundary Hydrographic Data Harmonization meeting during February to harmonize watershed delineations along the Canadian border. The DNR GIS Hydrologist promoted the use of LiDAR data and application of the technology for Minnesota as the Chair of the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee. This work included the continuation of LiDAR training for water resource managers in seven workshops across the state.",,,,72703,43561,,0.8,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2011,190000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY11 DNR will work with United States Geological Survey (USGS) to update the watershed boundary datasets with DNR Catchment geometry. Staff will integrate LiDAR data and conduct LiDAR training to facilitate LiDAR data utilization in water-related applications. DNR will also assist the USGS in the completion of the WBD watershed dataset and continue to advance the use of DNR Catchments as core data for the State's clean water initiatives.","In FY11 DNR watershed hydrologists completed work with USGS for Watershed updates and used LiDAR-derived digital elevation models for a detailed delineation of 158 shallow lake watersheds. As the MN LiDAR Research and Education Committee Chair DNR's watershed delineator developed and taught LiDAR training courses and coordinated the implementation of LiDAR for use in the DNR and the State.",,,,,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 25360,"Watershed Delineation",2010,180000,"M.L. 2009 Ch. 172 Art. 2 Sec. 5(a)","$1240000 the first year and $2460000 the second year are for assisting in water quality assessments in supporting the identification of impaired waters.","In FY10 DNR will initiate watershed delineations for shallow lakes and 2 500 basins between 50-100 acres and update 10 watershed delineations with LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) and/or completed Drainage Modernization data. ","In FY10 DNR's watershed delineator mapped drainage areas of 257 shallow lakes in four Major Watersheds and used LiDAR data to complete watershed delineations for two major watersheds. This work was temporarily suspended until technology evolved to more efficiently analyze LiDAR derived products.",,,,,,,,,,"This project delineates and maps watersheds (drainage areas) of lakes, rivers, streams, and wetlands for the state of Minnesota and provides watershed maps in digital form for use in geographic information systems. These maps become the basis for clean water planning and implementation efforts. ","A watershed is an area of land that drains to a common body of water. The natural characteristics of a lake, river, stream, or wetland are determined by its watershed's size, shape, vegetation, soils, geology, and topography. Land uses like urban development, agriculture, mining, or logging can contribute increased runoff and pollution from the watershed to the receiving water body. Because the health of a water resource so strongly linked to its watershed, understanding watersheds is key to understanding strategies needed for clean water. ",,2009-07-01,,"Clean Water Fund","In Progress",,,Sean,Vaughn,"Minnesota Department of Natural Resources","800 Oak Savanna Ln SW","Cambridget, MN",MN,55008,"(763) 689-7106",sean.vaughn@state.mn.us,"Analysis/Interpretation, Assessment/Evaluation, Digitization/Online Information Access, Education/Outreach/Engagement, Mapping, Modeling, Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Department of Natural Resources",,Statewide,,,https://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/watershed-delineation-1,,,, 37677,"Winter Maintenance Assessment tool",2017,47612,,,,,,,,,,,0.14,LimnoTech,"For-Profit Business/Entity","The goal of this project is to maintain and make enhancements to the Winter Maintenance Assessment tool (WMAt), which is a necessary technical resource and planning tool for stakeholders and permittees to implement the chloride reduction strategies described in the Chloride Management Plan. The WMAt is critical for assisting stakeholders in meeting the water quality goals of the Chloride Management Plan without compromising public safety, and allowing for consideration of the varying resources and conditions for each individual winter maintenance program. The tool also allows for assistance with tracking and reporting the progress being made by the users to implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will prevent chloride pollution and protect Minnesota’s waters. ",,"Minnesota Pollution Control Agency - Chloride (Salts) ",2017-07-03,2020-06-16,"Clean Water Fund",Completed,,,Rachel,Olmanson,MPCA,"520 Lafayette Rd N","Saint Paul",MN,55155,"(651) 757-2473",,"Planning, Research, Technical Assistance","Minnesota Pollution Control Agency",,Statewide,,Statewide,http://www.legacy.mn.gov/projects/winter-maintenance-assessment-tool-0,,,,